66
APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT

Page 2: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging
Page 3: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging
Page 4: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 1 June, 2016

Executive Summary

Project Overview

Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P. (TMPL) submitted a System Access Service Request (SASR) to the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) to supply electricity to a proposed industrial load addition in the Gainford area.

The SASR includes a request for a Rate DTS, Demand Transmission Service, contract capacity increase from 3.5 MW to 14.5 MW for the system access service provided at the existing Gainford 165S substation, and a request for transmission development (collectively, the Project). Specifically, TMPL requested an upgrade to the existing Gainford 165S substation to support the increased demand at the Gainford Pump Station for Kinder Morgan Canada’s proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project.

The scheduled in-service date for the Project is February 1, 2019.

This report details the system performance studies undertaken to assess the impact of the Project on the Alberta interconnected electric system (AIES).

Existing System

Geographically, the Project is located in the AESO planning area of Wabamun (Area 40), which is part of the AESO Edmonton Planning Region. The Wabamun area is surrounded by the Edmonton (Area 60), Athabasca/Lac La Biche (Area 27), Swan Hills (Area 26), Hinton/Edson (Area 29), Drayton Valley (Area 30), and Wetaskiwin (Area 31) planning areas.

From an electrical system perspective, there is a significant amount of base-load coal-fired generation in the Wabamun area. The transmission system is comprised of 500 kV, 240 kV, 138 kV and 69 kV facilities. The Wabamun area (Area 40) is connected to the rest of the AIES by:

500 kV transmission lines 1325L, 1202L and 1209L;

240 kV transmission lines 973L, 974L, 1043L, 903L, 190L, 905L, 922L, 926L, 919L, 989L, 1045L, 909L and 913L; and,

138 kV lines 834L, 744L, 799L, 672L, 723L, 452L, and 7L230.

The Gainford 165S substation has a T-tap connection onto the 138 kV transmission line 156L (Wabamun 19S – Entwistle 235S) through the 138 kV transmission line 156BL.

The existing constraints in the Edmonton Region are managed in accordance with the procedures set out in Section 302.1 of the ISO rules, Real Time Transmission Constraint Management. Automatic protection schemes are also presently used to manage thermal and transient stability violations in the Edmonton Region.

Study Summary

Study Area for the Project

The study area for the project consists of the Wabamun area (Area 40). The study area also includes the transmission lines connecting the Wabamun planning area to neighboring planning areas. All transmission facilities within the study area were studied and monitored to assess the

Page 5: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 2 June, 2016

impact of the Project on the AIES, including any violations of the Reliability Criteria (as defined in Section 2.1.1).

Studies Performed for the Project

Power flow analysis was performed for the 2016-2017 winter peak (WP) and 2017 summer peak (SP) pre-Project and post-Project scenarios. Voltage stability analysis was performed for the 2016-2017 WP post-Project scenario.

Results of the pre-Project Studies

No Reliability Criteria violations were observed for any of the pre-Project study scenarios.

Connection alternatives examined for the Project

The AESO examined two transmission alternatives to meet TMPL’s request for system access service:

Alternative 1: Upgrade the existing Gainford 165S substation by adding a second 138/4.16 kV transformer, with a rating of 15/20/25 MVA, and other associated equipment. Alternative 1 would require upgrading the existing 138 kV bus and the existing 4.16 kV bus, to facilitate the connection of the existing and new transformers. In addition, the substation fence would need to be expanded to accommodate the second transformer.

Alternative 2: Upgrade the existing Gainford 165S substation by replacing the existing 7.5/8.4 MVA, 138/4.16 kV transformer with a new 15/20/25 MVA, 138/4.16 kV transformer and adding other associated equipment. Alternative 2 would also require upgrading the existing 138 kV bus and the existing 4.16 kV bus, but fewer upgrades at both busses than necessary for Alternative 1, to facilitate the connection of the new transformer.

Connection alternatives selected for further examination

Alternative 2 was selected for further study. Alternative 1 involves additional transmission facilities and hence, additional cost compared to Alternative 2. Similar to Alternative 2, Alternative 1 requires upgrades to the existing 138 kV bus and the existing 4.16 kV bus; however, the scope of bus upgrades required for Alternative 1 would be greater than for Alternative 2. Further, Alternative 1 requires expansion of the substation fence to accommodate the second transformer. Therefore, Alternative 1 was not selected for further study.

Results of the post-Project studies

Similar to the pre-Project power flow scenarios, no thermal or voltage violations were observed for Category A conditions and Category B contingency conditions in any of the post-Project power flow scenarios. Voltage stability analysis was also performed. No violation of the voltage stability criteria was observed subsequent to the connection of the Project using Alternative 2.

Conclusions and Recommendation

Based on the study results, Alternative 2 is technically viable. The studies show that the connection of the Project using Alternative 2 would not adversely impact the performance of the AIES. Therefore, it is recommended to proceed with the Project using Alternative 2 as the preferred option to respond to TMPL’s request for system access service.

Page 6: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 3 June, 2016

Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5

1.1. Project .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Project Overview .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2. Load Component .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.3. Generation Component ........................................................................................................ 5

1.2. Study Scope ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1. Study Objectives ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2. Study Area ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.2.3. Studies Performed ................................................................................................................ 8

1.3. Report Overview ........................................................................................................................... 8 2. Criteria, System Data, and Study Assumptions ............................................................................ 10

2.1. Criteria, Standards, and Requirements ...................................................................................... 10 2.1.1. Transmission Planning Standards and Reliability Criteria .................................................. 10 2.1.2. AESO Rules ....................................................................................................................... 11

2.2. Study Scenarios ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.3. Load and Generation Assumptions ............................................................................................ 12

2.3.1. Load Assumptions .............................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2. Generation Assumptions .................................................................................................... 12 2.3.3. Intertie Flow Assumptions .................................................................................................. 13 2.3.4. HVDC Power Order Assumptions ...................................................................................... 13

2.4. System Projects ......................................................................................................................... 13 2.5. Customer Connection Projects ................................................................................................... 14 2.6. Facility Ratings and Shunt Elements .......................................................................................... 15 2.7. Voltage Profile Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 17

3. Study Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.1. Connection Studies Carried Out ................................................................................................. 18 3.2. Power Flow Analysis .................................................................................................................. 18

3.2.1. Contingencies Studied ........................................................................................................ 19 3.3. Voltage Stability (PV) Analysis ................................................................................................... 19

3.3.1. Contingencies Studied ........................................................................................................ 19 4. Pre-Project System Assessment .................................................................................................... 20

4.1. Pre-Project Power Flow Analysis ............................................................................................... 20 4.1.1. Scenario 1: 2016-2017 Winter Peak ................................................................................... 20 4.1.2. Scenario 2: 2017 Summer Peak ......................................................................................... 20

5. Connection Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 21 5.1. Overview .................................................................................................................................... 21 5.2. Connection Alternatives Identified .............................................................................................. 21

5.2.1. Connection Alternatives Selected for Further Studies ........................................................ 21 5.2.2. Connection Alternatives Not Selected for Further Studies ................................................. 21

6. Technical Analysis of the Preferred Connection Alternative ....................................................... 22 6.1. Power Flow Analysis .................................................................................................................. 22

6.1.1. Scenario 3: 2016-2017 Winter Peak ................................................................................... 22 6.1.2. Scenario 4: 2017 Summer Peak ......................................................................................... 22

Page 7: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 4 June, 2016

6.2. Voltage Stability .......................................................................................................................... 22 6.3. Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................... 23 6.4. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 23

7. Project Dependencies...................................................................................................................... 24 8. Summary and Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 25

Page 8: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 5 June, 2016

Attachments

Attachment A Pre-Project Power Flow Diagrams (Scenarios 1 and 2)

Attachment B Post-Project Power Flow Diagrams (Scenarios 3 and 4)

Attachment C Alternative 2: Voltage Stability Diagrams (Scenario 3)

Figures

Figure 1-1: Existing Transmission System in the Study Area ......................................................................................... 7

Tables

Table 1.2-1: Summary of System Projects in the Vicinity of the Study Area .................................................................. 8 Table 2.1-1: Post Contingency Voltage Deviation Guidelines ....................................................................................... 11 Table 2.2-1: List of the Connection Study Scenarios .................................................................................................... 11 Table 2.3-1: Forecast Area Load (2012 LTOU at AIL Peak) ......................................................................................... 12 Table 2.3-2: Existing Local Generation (MW) in the Study Cases ................................................................................ 12 Table 2.4-1: Summary of System Projects Included in the Study Scenarios ................................................................ 13 Table 2.5-1: Summary of Customer Connection Assumptions ..................................................................................... 14 Table 2.6-1: Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area (MVA on Voltage Class Base) ...................... 15 Table 2.6-2: Summary of Transformer Ratings in the Study Area ................................................................................ 16 Table 3.1-1: Summary of Studies Performed ................................................................................................................ 18 Table 6.2-1: Scenario 3: 2016-2017 WP– Voltage stability analysis results ................................................................. 23

Page 9: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 5 June, 2016

1. Introduction

This Customer Connection Engineering Study Report presents the results of the study conducted to assess the impact of the Project (as defined below) on the performance of the Alberta interconnected electric system (AIES).

1.1. Project

1.1.1. Project Overview

Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P. (TMPL) submitted a System Access Service Request (SASR) to the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) to supply electricity to a proposed industrial load addition in the Gainford area.

The SASR includes a request for a Rate DTS, Demand Transmission Service, contract capacity increase from 3.5 MW to 14.5 MW for the system access service provided at the existing Gainford 165S substation, and a request for transmission development (collectively, the Project). Specifically, TMPL requested an upgrade to the existing Gainford 165S substation to support the increased demand at the Gainford Pump Station for Kinder Morgan Canada’s proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project.

The scheduled in-service date (ISD) for the Project is February 1, 2019.

1.1.2. Load Component

The existing Rate DTS contract capacity for the system access service provided at the existing Gainford 165S substation is 3.5 MW. TMPL has requested a Rate DTS contract capacity increase to 14.5 MW.

The new load at the Gainford Pump Station consists of three 5000 HP induction motors. One Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) will be used to start the motors one at a time. In an emergency, the motors may be started across-the-line (without the VFD).

This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging power factor (pf) for the load associated with the Project.

TMPL has not indicated plans for a future load increase requiring service from the Gainford 165S substation in the SASR.

1.1.3. Generation Component

There is no generation component associated with the Project.

Page 10: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 6 June, 2016

1.2. Study Scope

1.2.1. Study Objectives

The objectives of the study are the following:

Assess the impact of the Project on the performance of the AIES.

Identify any violations of the relevant criteria, standards or requirements of the AESO, both before and after connection of the Project.

Recommend mitigation measures, if required, to enable the reliable connection of the Project to the AIES.

1.2.2. Study Area

1.2.2.1. Study Area Description

Geographically, the Project is located in the AESO planning area of Wabamun (Area 40), which is part of the AESO Edmonton Planning Region. The Wabamun area is surrounded by the Edmonton (Area 60), Athabasca/Lac La Biche (Area 27), Swan Hills (Area 26), Hinton/Edson (Area 29), Drayton Valley (Area 30), and Wetaskiwin (Area 31) planning areas.

From an electrical system perspective, there is a significant amount of base-load coal-fired generation in the Wabamun area. The transmission system is comprised of 500 kV, 240 kV, 138 kV and 69 kV facilities. The Wabamun area (Area 40) is connected to the rest of the AIES by:

500 kV transmission lines 1325L, 1202L and 1209L;

240 kV transmission lines 973L, 974L, 1043L, 903L, 190L, 905L, 922L, 926L, 919L, 989L, 1045L, 909L and 913L; and,

138 kV lines 834L, 744L, 799L, 672L, 723L, 452L, and 7L230.

The Gainford 165S substation has a T-tap connection onto the 138 kV transmission line 156L (Wabamun 19S – Entwistle 235S) through the 138 kV transmission line 156BL.

The study area for the project consists of the Wabamun area (Area 40). The study area also includes the transmission lines connecting the Wabamun planning area to neighboring planning areas. All transmission facilities within the study area were studied and monitored to assess the impact of the Project on the AIES, including any violations of the Reliability Criteria (as defined in Section 2.1.1).

Figure 1-1 shows the existing transmission system in the study area.

Page 11: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 7 June, 2016

Figure 1-1: Existing Transmission System in the Study Area

Page 12: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 8 June, 2016

1.2.2.2. Existing Constraints

The existing constraints in the Edmonton Region are managed in accordance with the procedures set out in Section 302.1 of the ISO rules, Real Time Transmission Constraint Management (the TCM Rule). Automatic protection schemes are also presently used to manage thermal and transient stability violations in the Edmonton Region.

1.2.2.3. AESO Long-Term Transmission Plans (LTP)

The South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development1 is included in all the study scenarios. There are no other system projects or projects included in the AESO 2015 Long-term Transmission Plan (2015 LTP)2 that are planned to be developed in the vicinity of the Project location in the near term (by 2020).

Table 1.2-1: Summary of System Projects in the Vicinity of the Study Area

Project Number Project Name

Project Area

In-Service Date

850 South and West of Edmonton

Area Transmission Development

60 December

2017

1.2.3. Studies Performed

The following studies were performed for the pre-Project analysis:

Power flow analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

The following studies were performed for the post-Project analysis:

Power flow analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

Voltage stability analysis (Category A conditions and Category B contingencies)

1.3. Report Overview

The Executive Summary provides a high-level summary of the study and its conclusions. Section 1 provides an introduction of the Project and describes the study scope. Section 2 describes the criteria, system data, and other study assumptions used in this study. Section 3 describes the methodology used for this study. Section 4 discusses the pre-Project assessment of the system. Section 5 presents all the connection alternatives examined. Section 6 provides a technical analysis of the post-Project system assessment for the alternative selected for further study. Section 7 presents any dependencies the Project may have on other AESO plans to

1 The Alberta Utilities Commission approved the need for the South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission System Reinforcement on May 5, 2014 in Decision 2014-126 and Approval U2014-183.

2 The 2015 LTP document is available on the AESO website.

Page 13: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 9 June, 2016

expand or enhance the transmission system. Section 8 presents the conclusions and recommendations of this study.

Page 14: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 10 June, 2016

2. Criteria, System Data, and Study Assumptions

2.1. Criteria, Standards, and Requirements

2.1.1. Transmission Planning Standards and Reliability Criteria

The Transmission Planning (TPL) Standards, which are included in the Alberta Reliability Standards, and the AESO’s Transmission Planning Criteria – Basis and Assumptions (collectively, the Reliability Criteria) 3 were applied to evaluate system performance under Category A system conditions (i.e., all elements in-service) and following Category B contingencies (i.e., single element outage), prior to and following the studied alternatives. Below is a summary of Category A and Category B system conditions as well as a summary of Category C5 system conditions.

Category A, often referred to as the N-0 condition, represents a normal system with no contingencies and all facilities in service. Under this condition, the system must be able to supply all firm load and firm transfers to other areas. All equipment must operate within its applicable rating, voltages must be within their applicable range, and the system must be stable with no cascading outages.

Category B events, often referred to as an N-1 or N-G-1 with the most critical generator out of service, result in the loss of any single specified system element under specified fault conditions with normal clearing. These elements are a generator, a transmission circuit, a transformer, or a single pole of a DC transmission line. The acceptable impact on the system is the same as Category A. Planned or controlled interruptions of electric supply to radial customers or some local network customers, connected to or supplied by the faulted element or by the affected area, may occur in certain areas without impacting the overall reliability of the interconnected transmission systems. To prepare for the next contingency, system adjustments are permitted, including curtailments of contracted firm (non-recallable reserved) transmission service electric power transfers.

The TPL standards, TPL-001-AB-0 and TPL-002-AB-0, have referenced Applicable Ratings when specifying the required system performance under Category A and Category B events, respectively. For the purpose of applying the TPL standards to the studies documented in this report, Applicable Ratings are defined as follows:

Seasonal continuous thermal rating of the line’s loading limits.

Highest specified loading limits for transformers.

For Category A conditions: Voltage range under normal operating condition should

follow the AESO Information Document ID# 2010-007RS. For the busses not listed in

ID#2010-007RS, Table 2-1 in the Reliability Criteria applies.

3 Filed under separate cover.

Page 15: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 11 June, 2016

For Category B conditions: The extreme voltage range values per Table 2-1 in the

Reliability Criteria.

Desired post-contingency voltage change limits for three defined post event timeframes as provided in Table 2.1-1.

Table 2.1-1: Post Contingency Voltage Deviation Guidelines

Parameter and reference point

Time Period

Post Transient (up to 30 sec)

Post Auto Control (30 sec to 5 min)

Post Manual Control (Steady

State)

Voltage deviation from steady state at point-of-delivery low voltage bus.

±10% ±7% ±5%

2.1.2. AESO Rules

AESO Information document ID# 2010-007RS, General Operating Practices - Voltage Control, which relates to Section 304.4 of the ISO rules, Maintaining Network Voltage, was applied to establish system normal (i.e., pre-contingency) voltage profiles in the study area and its vicinity. The TCM Rule will be followed in setting up the study scenarios and assessment of the impact of the Project connection. In addition, due regard will be given to the AESO’s Connection Study Requirements and the AESO’s Generation and Load Interconnection Standard.

The Reliability Criteria is the basis for planning the AIES. The transmission system will normally be designed to meet or exceed the Reliability Criteria under credible worst-case loading and generation conditions.

2.2. Study Scenarios

Table 2.2-1 summarizes the study scenarios used for the connection assessment. This connection assessment will assume a 0.9 lagging power factor (pf) for the load associated with the Project. Scenarios 1 and 2 are the pre-Project scenarios for 2016-2017 WP and 2017 SP, respectively and Scenarios 3 and 4 are the post-Project scenarios for 2016-2017 WP and 2017 SP, respectively. A power factor of 0.9 lagging was used for the new Project load.

Table 2.2-1: List of the Connection Study Scenarios

Scenario Year/Season

Load Condition

Project Load (MW)

Gainford 165S Load (MW)

System Generation Dispatch

Conditions

1 2016-2017 WP Pre-project 0 3.5

Merit-order based dispatch

2 2017 SP Pre-Project 0 3.5

3 2016-2017 WP Post Project 11 14.5

4 2017 SP Post-Project 11 14.5

Page 16: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 12 June, 2016

2.3. Load and Generation Assumptions

2.3.1. Load Assumptions

The load forecasts used for this connection study are shown in Table 2.3-1 and are based on the AESO 2012 Long-term Outlook Update (2012 LTOU). In this study, the active power to reactive power ratio in the study scenarios was maintained when modifying the loads to comply with the forecast shown in Table 2.3-1.

Table 2.3-1: Forecast Area Load (2012 LTOU at AIL Peak)

Area or Region Name and Season

Forecast Peak Load (MW)

2016-2017 WP

(MW)

2017 SP

(MW)

Wabamun (Area 40) 229 193

Edmonton (Area 60) 1935 1815

Wetaskiwin (Area 31) 155 133

Alberta Internal Load (AIL) w/o Losses 12552 11607

2.3.2. Generation Assumptions

The generation conditions for this connection study are described in Table 2.3-2. Keephills Unit 3 is considered to be the critical generating unit for the purposes of the studies, and is assumed to be offline for the power flow and voltage stability analyses.

Table 2.3-2: Existing Local Generation (MW) in the Study Cases

Unit Name Bus

Number Area

Pmax (MW)

2016-2017 WP

Unit Net Generation4 (MW)

2017 SP

Unit Net Generation (MW)

Sundance 1 129 40 300 263 263

Sundance 2 338 40 300 263 263

Sundance 3A 130 40 395 336 336

Sundance 4A 342 40 430 379 379

Sundance 5A 345 40 435.4 367 367

Sundance 6A 350 40 425 373 373

Keephills 1 422 40 415 396 374

Keephills 2 424 40 415 388 372

Keephills 3 403 40 498 0 0

4 Unit Net Generation refers to Gross Generating unit MW output less Unit Service Load.

Page 17: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 13 June, 2016

Unit Name Bus

Number Area

Pmax (MW)

2016-2017 WP

Unit Net Generation4 (MW)

2017 SP

Unit Net Generation (MW)

Joffre 1 3354 35 158 66.2 55.2

Joffre 2 3355 35 163 68.1 36.6

Joffre 3 3357 35 133 54.8 50.2

Celanese 1 25402 60 6.6 0 0

Celanese 2 25402 60 6.6 0 0

Celanese 3 25402 60 6.6 0 0

Celanese 4 25401 60 6.6 0 0

Cloverbar G1 25516 60 43.9 45 37

Cloverbar G2 26516 60 100 96 86

Cloverbar G3 27516 60 100.8 96 86

Genesee 1 491 40 422 376 376

Genesee 2A 492 40 422 378 378

Genesee 3 490 40 527.4 434 434

2.3.3. Intertie Flow Assumptions

The Alberta-BC, Alberta-Montana, and Alberta-Saskatchewan intertie points are deemed to be too far away to have any material impact on the connection assessment for the Project. Therefore, the intertie assumptions are kept consistent with that in the corresponding AESO planning base cases and not adjusted in the study scenarios.

2.3.4. HVDC Power Order Assumptions

The flows in the Study Area are not significantly influenced by the AIES Western Alberta Transmission Line (WATL) and Eastern Alberta Transmission Line (EATL) HVDC facilities. Hence, the HVDC power order assumptions were kept consistent with that in the corresponding AESO planning base cases and not adjusted in the study scenarios.

2.4. System Projects

Table 2.4-1 lists the South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development subprojects that have been included in this study. Other than the South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development subprojects, no additional system projects were included in the study scenarios.

Table 2.4-1: Summary of System Projects Included in the Study Scenarios

Project Subproject Subproject Name In-Service Date

Page 18: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 14 June, 2016

Project Subproject Subproject Name In-Service Date

850 1 174L/780L 138 kV Transmission Line Renumbering Dec 29, 2017

850 2 Cooking Lake 522S Substation Dec 29, 2017

850 3 Saunders Lake 289S Substation and Transmission Lines Dec 29, 2017

850 4 Nisku 149S Modifications Dec 29, 2017

850 5 New 454L/455L 138 kV Transmission Line between Saunders

Lake 289S and Nisku 149S Dec 29, 2017

850 6 780L and 858L Transmission Line Modifications Dec 29, 2017

850 7 Leduc 325S 138 kV 27 MVA Capacitor Bank Dec 29, 2017

850 8 Wabamun 19S Open 133L Transmission Line Dec 29, 2017

850 9 Lines salvage (910L-914L-780L-858L) May 04, 2018

850 10 Telecomm Towers (Bardo 197S – Canmore 9285R) Dec 29, 2017

850 11 New Harry Smith 367S Substation Dec 31, 2017

850 12 Modifications at Acheson 305S Dec 31, 2017

850 13 Lines 446L/453L between Harry Smith 367S and Acheson

305S Dec 31, 2017

850 14 240 kV 1043L/1139L in-out at Harry Smith 367S Dec 31, 2017

850 15 EPCOR P&C and Line Renumbering Dec 31, 2017

2.5. Customer Connection Projects

The customer projects included in the study are shown in Table 2.5-1.

Table 2.5-1: Summary of Customer Connection Assumptions

Planning Area

Queue Position*

Planned In-

Service Date

Project Name Project

# Gen (MW)

Load (MW)

Included/Excluded from Studies

40 Energized Sep. 2013

Fortis Onoway 352S Transformer Replacement

1210 0 0 Included

40 Energized Nov. 2013

Cherhill 338S Transformer Addition

1223 0 0 Included

40 Energized Sep. 2014

Enbridge Bernese 293S Substation

1358 0 22.0 Included

Page 19: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 15 June, 2016

2.6. Facility Ratings and Shunt Elements

The Transmission Facility Owner (TFO) provided the ratings of the existing transmission lines (Table 2.6-1) and the existing transformers ( Table 2.6-2) in the Study Area.

Table 2.6-1: Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area (MVA on Voltage Class Base)

Line ID Line Description Voltage Class (kV)

Nominal Rating (MVA)

Short-term5 Rating (MVA)

Summer Winter Summer Winter

799L Mayerthorpe 443S – Entwistle 235S 138 85 90 94 99

799L South Mayerthorpe 443S – Sagitawah 77S 138 85 90 94 99

744L Entwistle 235S – 106S Tap 138 75 79 83 87

156L Entwistle 235S – Gainford 165S Tap 138 126 169 139 186

672L Entwistle 235S – Moon Lake 131S 138 167 201 184 218

123L Wabamun 19S – Onoway 352S 69 24CT6 24CT 36CT 36CT

133L Wabamun 19S – 234L Junction 69 29 36 32 40

124L Wabamun 19S – Wabamun 2739S 69 29 36 32 40

7L230 North Barrhead 69S – 888AL Tap 144 86 91 95 100

723L North Barrhead 69S – 724L Tap 138 86 91 95 100

888AL Fort Assiniboine 234S – 7L230 Junction 138 123 150 135 165

834L Keystone 384S – Keephills 320P 138 158 191CT 174 213

973L Bickerdike 39S – Sundance 310P 240 333CT 333CT 499CT 499CT

974L Bickerdike 39S – Sundance 310P 240 333CT 333CT 499CT 499CT

512L Sundance 310P – 521L Tap 69 22 27 24 30

512L Sundance 821S – 521L Tap 69 22 27 24 30

767L Sundance 310P – 767AL Tap 138 121 143CT 133 163

902L Wabamun 19S – Sundance 310P 240 499 499CT 499 499CT

905L Wabamun 19S – North Calder 37S 240 299 437 359 524

896L Wabamun 19S – Carvel 432S 138 121 149 133 164

156L Wabamun 19S – 156BL Tap 138 126 169 139 186

5 When line loading in post Category B contingency is observed to exceed nominal rating and is less than the Short-term (emergency) rating, it is assumed that AESO and TFO operating practices can manage the constraint within the time requirements of TFO short time (emergency) rating.

6 Limited by current transformer

Page 20: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 16 June, 2016

Line ID Line Description Voltage Class (kV)

Nominal Rating (MVA)

Short-term5 Rating (MVA)

Summer Winter Summer Winter

922L Sundance 310P – Benalto 17S 240 466 499CT 499 499CT

926L Sundance 310P – Benalto 17S 240 481 499CT 499 499CT

989L Sundance 310P – Sagitawah 77S 240 489 599 587 648

919L Sundance 310P – Sagitawah 77S 240 489 599 587 599

1046L Sundance 310P – Cherhill 338S 240 337 407 404 488

1045L Sundance 310P – Jasper 805S 240 481 581 577 697

909L Sundance 310P – Dome 665S 240 481 581 577 697

913L North Barrhead 69S – Cherhill 338S 240 337 407 404 488

9L913 North Barrhead 69S – Mitsue 732S 240 499CT 499CT 608 736

903L Benalto 17S – Keephills 320P 240 448 499CT 499 499

190L Benalto 17S – Keepthills 320P 240 466 499CT 499 499

1209L Ellerslie 89S – Genesee 330P 500 2500 2500 3250 3250

1202L Ellerslie 89S – Keephills 320P 500 2598CT 2598CT 3380 3464

522AL Sundance 866S – Keephils Make-up 868S 69 29 36 32 40

522L Keephills 320P – 133L Junction 69 22 27 24 30

767AL Marion 21S – 767L Junction 69 85 90 94 99

739L Stony Plain 434S – 739AL Tap 138 120 143CT 132 163

739L Carvel 432S – 739AL Tap 138 120 148 132 163

744L Niton 228S – 744AL Tap 138 75 79 83 87

767L Keephills 320P – 767CL Tap 138 121 148 133 163

156BL Gainford 165S – 156L Junction 138 121 149 133 164

739AL Bilby 105S – 739L Junction 138 123 151 135 166

744AL Paddle River 106S – 744L Junction 138 120 145 132 160

Table 2.6-2: Summary of Transformer Ratings in the Study Area

Substation Name and Number Transformer ID Transformer Voltages (kV)

MVA Rating

Wabamun 19S T1 240/138 200

Sundance 310P T1 240/138 168

Sundance 310P T4 240/69 44.8

Page 21: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 17 June, 2016

Substation Name and Number Transformer ID Transformer Voltages (kV)

MVA Rating

Keephills 320P T6 500/240 1200

Keephills 320P PS 240/240 600

Keephills 320P T1 240/138 150

Genesee 330P T1/T2 500/138 100

The Study Area does not include any shunt reactive devices.

2.7. Voltage Profile Assumptions

The AESO Voltage Control Practice ID # 2010-007RS is used to establish normal system (i.e., pre-contingency) voltage profiles for key area buses prior to commencing any studies. Table 2-1 of the Reliability Criteria applies for all the buses not included in the ID # 2010-007RS. These voltages were utilized to set the voltage profile in the study scenarios prior to conducting power flow analysis.

Page 22: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 18 June, 2016

3. Study Methodology

3.1. Connection Studies Carried Out

The studies that were carried out for this connection assessment are identified in

Table 3.1-1:

Table 3.1-1: Summary of Studies Performed

Scenario and Condition Project Load (MW)

System Conditions Power Flow7

Voltage Stability

1 2016-2017 WP Pre-Project 3.5 Category A and Category B Yes No

2 2017 SP Pre-Project 3.5 Category A and Category B Yes No

3 2016-2017 WP Post-Project 14.5 Category A and Category B Yes Yes

4 2017 SP Post-Project 14.5 Category A and Category B Yes No

3.2. Power Flow Analysis

The purpose of the power flow analysis is to quantify any incremental violations in the study area after the Project is connected. Power flow analysis was completed for all study scenarios to identify thermal overloads or voltage violations as per the Reliability Criteria, and to identify any deviations from the desired limits in Table 2.1-1. Transformer tap and switched shunt reactive compensation devices such as shunt capacitors and reactors were locked and continuous shunt devices were enabled when performing Category B load flow analysis. This methodology was used for both the pre-Project and post-Project scenarios.

Point-of-Delivery (POD) low voltage bus deviations were also assessed by first locking all tap changers and shunt reactive devices to identify any post-transient voltage deviations above 10%. Second, tap changers were then allowed to adjust, while shunt reactive devices remained locked to determine if any voltage deviations above 7% would occur in the Study Area. Third, all taps and shunt reactive device controls were allowed to adjust and voltage deviations above 5% were reported for both the pre-Project and post-Project systems.

7 The critical generator identified for this study is Keephills 3.

Page 23: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 19 June, 2016

3.2.1. Contingencies Studied

For the power flow analysis, all transmission facilities in the study area were monitored for voltage criteria violations and thermal violations under Category A conditions and under Category B contingency conditions. Power flow analysis was conducted for all Category B contingencies (69 kV facilities and above) within the study area, including the tie lines connecting the study area to the surrounding planning areas.

3.3. Voltage Stability (PV) Analysis

The objective of the voltage stability analysis is to determine the ability of the network to maintain voltage stability at all the buses in the Study Area under normal and abnormal system conditions. The Power-Voltage (PV) curve is a representation of voltage change as a result of increased power transfer between two systems. The reported incremental transfers will be to the collapse point. As per the AESO requirements, no assessment based upon other criteria such as minimum voltage will be made at the PV minimum transfer. Voltage stability analysis for post-Project scenarios will be performed. For load connection projects, the load level modelled in the post-connection scenarios are either the same or higher than in pre-Project scenarios. Therefore, voltage stability analysis for pre-Project scenarios will only be performed if post- Project scenarios show voltage stability criteria violations.

The voltage stability analysis was performed according to the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) Voltage Stability Assessment Methodology. WECC voltage stability criteria states, for load areas, post-transient voltage stability is required for the area modeled at a minimum of 105% of the reference load level for system normal conditions (Category A) and for single contingencies (Category B). For this standard, the reference load level is the maximum forecasted load for the Study Area.

Typically, voltage stability analysis is carried out assuming the worst case scenarios in terms of loading. Voltage stability analysis was performed by increasing the load in the Study Area and increasing the corresponding generation in the Wabamun (Area 40) and the Calgary (Area 6) planning areas.

3.3.1. Contingencies Studied

Voltage stability analysis was performed for the Category A condition and all Category B contingencies in the Study Area using the 2016-2017 WP post-Project scenario only.

Page 24: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 20 June, 2016

4. Pre-Project System Assessment

4.1. Pre-Project Power Flow Analysis

4.1.1. Scenario 1: 2016-2017 Winter Peak

No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions or under Category B contingency conditions.

Refer to Attachment A for power flow diagrams and a list of the top five Category B contingencies resulting in the highest post-contingency thermal loading on the facilities in the Study Area.

4.1.2. Scenario 2: 2017 Summer Peak

No Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions or under Category B contingency conditions.

Refer to Attachment A for power flow diagrams and a list of the top five Category B contingencies resulting in the highest post-contingency thermal loading on the facilities in the Study Area.

Page 25: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 21 June, 2016

5. Connection Alternatives

5.1. Overview

The Gainford 165S substation is owned by TMPL and no other customer is supplied from this POD substation. Thus, only alternatives involving development at the Gainford 165S substation were examined in this engineering study report.

5.2. Connection Alternatives Identified

The AESO examined two transmission alternatives to meet TMPL’s request for system access service:

Alternative 1: Upgrade the existing Gainford 165S substation by adding a second 138/4.16 kV transformer, with a rating of 15/20/25 MVA, and other associated equipment. Alternative 1 would require upgrading the existing 138 kV bus and the existing 4.16 kV bus, to facilitate the connection of the existing and new transformers. In addition, the substation fence would need to be expanded to accommodate the second transformer.

Alternative 2: Upgrade the existing Gainford 165S substation by replacing the existing 7.5/8.4 MVA, 138/4.16 kV transformer with a new 15/20/25 MVA, 138/4.16 kV transformer and adding other associated equipment. Alternative 2 would also require upgrading the existing 138 kV bus and the existing 4.16 kV bus, but fewer upgrades at both busses than necessary for Alternative 1, to facilitate the connection of the new transformer.

5.2.1. Connection Alternatives Selected for Further Studies

Alternative 2 was selected for further study.

5.2.2. Connection Alternatives Not Selected for Further Studies

Alternative 1 involves additional transmission facilities and hence, additional cost compared to Alternative 2. Similar to Alternative 2, Alternative 1 requires upgrades to the existing 138 kV bus and the existing 4.16 kV bus; however, the scope of bus upgrades required for Alternative 1 would be greater than for Alternative 2. Further, Alternative 1 requires expansion of the substation fence to accommodate the second transformer. Therefore, Alternative 1 was not selected for further study.

Page 26: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 22 June, 2016

6. Technical Analysis of the Preferred Connection Alternative

6.1. Power Flow Analysis

The following is a summary of the power flow analysis results for Project.

6.1.1. Scenario 3: 2016-2017 Winter Peak

Similar to the 2016-2017 WP pre-Project scenario, no Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions or under Category B contingency conditions.

Refer to Attachment B for power flow diagrams and a list of the top five Category B contingencies resulting in the highest post-contingency thermal loading on the facilities in the Study Area.

6.1.2. Scenario 4: 2017 Summer Peak

Similar to the 2017 SP pre-Project scenario, no Reliability Criteria violations were observed under Category A conditions or under Category B contingency conditions.

Refer to Attachment B for power flow diagrams and a list of the top five Category B contingencies resulting in the highest post-contingency thermal loading on the facilities in the Study Area.

6.2. Voltage Stability

Voltage stability analysis was performed using the 2016-2017 WP scenario (Scenario 3). The reference load level for the Study Area is 229 MW. The minimum incremental load transfer for the Category B contingencies is 5.0% of the reference load or 11.5 MW to meet the voltage stability criteria (0.05 x 229 MW = 11.5 MW). Table 6.2-1 summarizes the voltage stability results for Category A and the worst contingencies under Category B system conditions.

The voltage stability margin is met for all studied conditions.

The voltage stability diagrams are shown in Attachment C.

Page 27: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 23 June, 2016

Table 6.2-1: Scenario 3: 2016-2017 WP– Voltage stability analysis results

Contingency From To Maximum

incremental transfer (MW)

Meets 105% transfer criteria?

N-G System Normal 720 Yes

452L Stony Plain 434S Harry Smith 367S 460 Yes

330P G3 Genesee 330P 500 kV Genesee E330P 22 kV 560 Yes

69S T4 North Barrhead 69S 240/138 kV T4 580 Yes

1046L Sundance 310P Cherhill 338S 620 Yes

320P G1 Keephills 320P transformer G1 650 Yes

310P T5 Sundance 310P transformer T5 680 Yes

6.3. Mitigation Measures

No mitigation measures are needed for the Project as no Reliability Criteria violations were observed.

6.4. Conclusions

Based on the study results, Alternative 2 is technically viable. Power flow results indicate that there are no thermal criteria violations or voltage criteria violations prior to and after the Project. The voltage stability results confirm that the voltage stability margin of the study area meets the AESO requirement after the Project.

Page 28: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 24 June, 2016

7. Project Dependencies

The Project is not dependent on other AESO plans to expand or enhance the transmission system or any other planned connection projects.

Page 29: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 25 June, 2016

8. Summary and Conclusion

Project Overview

TMPL submitted a SASR to the AESO to supply electricity to a proposed industrial load addition in the Gainford area.

The SASR includes a request for a Rate DTS, Demand Transmission Service, contract capacity increase from 3.5 MW to 14.5 MW for the system access service provided at the existing Gainford 165S substation, and a request for transmission development. Specifically, TMPL requested an upgrade to the existing Gainford 165S substation to support the increased demand at the Gainford Pump Station for Kinder Morgan Canada’s proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project.

The scheduled in-service date for the Project is February 1, 2019.

Recommendation

Based on the study results, Alternative 2 is technically viable. The studies show that the connection of the Project using Alternative 2 would not adversely impact the performance of the AIES. Therefore, it is recommended to proceed with the Project using Alternative 2 as the preferred option to respond to the TMPL’s request for system access service.

Page 30: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 26 June, 2016

Attachment A

Pre-Project Power Flow Diagrams (Scenarios 1 to 2)

Page 31: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A1-SYSTEM NORMAL

P1412

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 649.8 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility UpgradeBus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.5

60.2

28.4

60.0

22.3

437TMPL2GA7

1.01139.8

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.02140.1

47.9

6.4

48.2

6.5

134WABAMUN7

48.3

6.6

48.2

6.5

101.4

14.0

101.2

19.1

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.8

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.8

23.2

12.7

23.2

12.7

1.01139.8

41N BARRH7

1.03141.9

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.8

30.5

13.8

30.1

12.4

19.1

2.6

18.9

63.8

11.6

64.0

8.8

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.0

6.9

25.1

6.5

21.4

360STONY P7

1.02140.7

905105S TAP

1.02140.4

2092HS_138

1.03142.2

9.8

19.5

9.8

19.9

37.3

30.3

37.5

29.9

0.0

364CARVEL01

1.01140.0

15.4

19.1

15.4

18.7

37.8

14.2

37.4

13.41.02140.3

4437TMPL2GA9

1.004.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.6

8651043L-X4

1.05251.3

155BENALTO4

1.05252.3

539.1

96.3

539.1

96.0

196.8

31.3

196.6

10.2

16.4

10.2

22.6

10.3

16.4

10.2

22.7

SW

122.5

37.7

196.6

37.7

196.3

44.4

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.2

9.9

10.3

10.0

30.9

9.9

10.3

9.9

31.0

505JASPER 4

1.02245.1

521PETROLIA

1.02244.7

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.8

60.1

24.2

60.1

28.5

176.2 176.1

39.0

301.0

36.0

293.6

17.1

109.8

SW

39.1

133WABAMUN4

313.7

22.0

315.7

30.5

137N CALDE4

1.02244.0

148.3

23.9

148.5

23.7212.3

36.0

209.0

26.1

1.05251.3

1.05251.7

512DOME 4

284.1

41.8

277.3

26.8

1.06254.4

1.02244.5

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.9

223.3

32.6

220.8

34.5

195.8

43.4 44.9

138N BARRH4

197.7

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0024.9

14.2 14.1

3.7

9914.1

3.7

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6

3360STONY A9

1.0225.6

23.6

5.4

23.4

3.5

23.6 23.4

3.5

23.4

3.5

9923.4

3.5

4.8

5.4

99

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

76.536

27.9

14.04A

379.0

90.5R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

53.3

343.6

105.4

23.4

11.7

5A367.0

117.1R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

8.1

346.6

66.3

3626.4

13.2

6A373.0

79.5R

23.4

36

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.5

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.3

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.8

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.5

271.5

70.6

271.6

47.2

426.8

88.5

427.4

5.7

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.3

331.6

16.5

331.6

17.0

331.6

16.5

331.6

17.0

514.0

101.2

514.8

28.0

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

24.7

389.8

94.0

387.2

23.4

388.7

93.4

361A

415.0

106.6R

3625.1

2A413.8

106.0R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

3640.4

320.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

17.5

375.8

35.0

3631.0

15.5 1407.7

33.0R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

18.9

377.5

34.8

3631.1

15.5 2A409.8

34.4R

1

Page 32: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A2-CONTINGENCY 1045L(CONVERGED)

P1412

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 658.1 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility UpgradeBus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.1

40.9

28.7

40.8

24.1

437TMPL2GA7

1.01139.6

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.01139.9

43.5

5.6

43.7

5.9

134WABAMUN7

43.7

6.0

43.7

5.9

113.9

14.9

113.7

21.2

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.8

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.8

23.2

12.7

23.2

12.7

1.01139.6

41N BARRH7

1.03141.9

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.5

28.5

13.0

28.1

11.6

30.2

5.0

29.8

72.9

13.2

73.1

9.7

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.1

5.0

24.2

4.6

20.5

360STONY P7

1.01139.9

905105S TAP

1.01139.6

2092HS_138

1.02141.4

26.1

23.7

26.2

23.9

21.0

34.5

21.1

33.9

3.0

364CARVEL01

1.01139.4

31.9

23.0

31.8

22.7

54.8

16.9

53.9

17.21.01140.1

4437TMPL2GA9

1.004.1

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.0

8651043L-X4

1.04250.6

155BENALTO4

1.05252.1

573.5

109.5

573.5

109.2

206.9

33.4

206.7

22.9

16.0

22.8

22.6

23.0

16.0

22.9

22.6

SW

122.3

40.6

206.7

40.6

206.4

48.0

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.5

20.0

13.3

20.0

27.6

20.1

13.4

20.0

27.6

505JASPER 4

1.01242.6

521PETROLIA

1.01243.2

955PDMAKER1

1.01242.5

222.6

16.2

223.5

15.5

45.1 45.1

27.4

107.6

SW

26.9

133WABAMUN4

406.1

29.3

409.4

47.2

137N CALDE4

1.01242.2

17.5

14.0

17.5

12.1292.2

44.2

285.9

14.0

1.04250.6

1.05251.1

512DOME 4

375.1

50.4

363.5

9.2

1.06254.3

1.01243.4

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.0

235.9

30.3

233.1

33.8

207.8

43.9 44.2

138N BARRH4

210.0

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0024.9

14.2 14.1

3.7

9914.1

3.7

4360STONY P9

1.0225.4

3360STONY A9

1.0225.4

23.6

5.4

23.4

3.5

23.6 23.4

3.5

23.4

3.5

9923.4

3.5

4.8

5.5

99

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

73.736

27.9

14.04A

379.0

87.7R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

50.6

343.6

102.5

23.4

11.7

5A367.0

114.2R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

5.7

346.6

63.7

3626.4

13.2

6A373.0

76.9R

20.7

36

610KEEPHIL2

1.06528.6

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.4

258ELLERSLI

1.05525.5

510KEEPHIL3

1.06528.6

274.9

81.0

275.0

57.7

440.3

93.8

440.9

12.6

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.4

324.2

18.0

324.2

18.6

324.2

18.0

324.2

18.6

528.9

109.4

529.8

38.0

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

30.5

389.8

100.4

387.2

29.1

388.7

99.7

361A

415.0

113.0R

3625.1

2A413.8

112.3R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

3640.4

320.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

21.8

375.8

30.8

3631.0

15.5 1407.7

37.3R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

23.2

377.5

30.6

3631.1

15.5 2A409.8

38.7R

1

Page 33: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A3-CONTINGENCY N. BARRH T4(CONVERGED)

P1412

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 652.1 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility UpgradeBus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.4

59.0

28.5

58.8

22.5

437TMPL2GA7

1.01139.7

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.02140.1

48.4

6.4

48.6

6.6

134WABAMUN7

48.7

6.6

48.6

6.6

103.2

14.2

103.0

19.4

44FT ASBN7

1.01139.7

844ASBNE TP

1.01139.7

23.2

12.8

23.2

12.8

1.01139.7

41N BARRH7

1.01138.9

934FLAT TAP

1.01139.1

5.0

6.7

5.0

4.6

9.2

1.8

9.3

1266SARAH L7

1.06145.9

28.2

17.4

28.9

14.5

360STONY P7

1.02140.6

905105S TAP

1.02140.3

2092HS_138

1.03142.2

11.0

20.0

11.0

20.3

36.1

30.8

36.3

30.3

4.5

364CARVEL01

1.01140.0

16.7

19.6

16.6

19.1

39.1

14.6

38.6

13.91.02140.3

4437TMPL2GA9

1.004.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.5

8651043L-X4

1.05251.2

155BENALTO4

1.05252.3

541.8

97.1

541.8

96.8

197.5

31.4

197.3

11.4

16.5

11.3

22.5

11.4

16.5

11.4

22.6

SW

122.4

37.9

197.3

37.9

197.0

44.6

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.2

8.0

10.7

8.0

30.5

7.9

10.7

8.0

30.5

505JASPER 4

1.02244.9

521PETROLIA

1.02244.6

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.7

61.7

23.0

61.8

27.3

184.9 184.8

38.3

308.3

36.5

300.5

15.6

109.7

SW

38.5

133WABAMUN4

321.6

21.9

323.6

31.1

137N CALDE4

1.02243.8

156.9

23.1

157.2

23.1218.4

36.2

214.9

24.9

1.05251.2

1.05251.6

512DOME 4

290.4

41.8

283.3

25.3

1.06254.7

1.02244.4

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.2

179.4

32.2

177.8

28.9

153.5

33.8 39.3

138N BARRH4

154.7

3344FT ASBN8

1.0025.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

0.9724.4

14.2 14.1

3.7

9914.1

3.7

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6

3360STONY A9

1.0225.6

23.6

5.4

23.4

3.5

23.6 23.4

3.5

23.4

3.5

9923.4

3.5

4.9

5.4

99

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

77.036

27.9

14.04A

379.0

91.0R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

53.8

343.6

105.9

23.4

11.7

5A367.0

117.6R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

8.6

346.6

66.7

3626.4

13.2

6A373.0

79.9R

23.8

36

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.4

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.2

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.6

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.4

271.6

71.5

271.7

48.1

427.6

89.1

428.3

6.4

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.2

331.2

16.7

331.2

17.3

331.2

16.7

331.2

17.3

514.9

102.1

515.7

29.0

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

25.2

389.8

94.6

387.2

23.9

388.7

94.0

361A

415.0

107.2R

3625.1

2A413.8

106.6R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

3640.4

320.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

18.0

375.8

34.6

3631.0

15.5 1407.7

33.5R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

19.4

377.5

34.4

3631.1

15.5 2A409.8

34.9R

1

Page 34: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A4-CONTINGENCY 1046L(CONVERGED)

P1412

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 667.9 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility UpgradeBus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.2

57.8

30.0

57.5

24.0

437TMPL2GA7

1.01139.4

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.01139.8

54.8

7.3

55.1

7.2

134WABAMUN7

55.2

7.2

55.1

7.2

110.2

15.2

109.9

21.1

44FT ASBN7

1.02140.3

844ASBNE TP

1.02140.3

23.2

12.8

23.2

12.8

1.01139.4

41N BARRH7

1.01139.8

934FLAT TAP

1.01139.5

13.2

1.0

13.3

3.0

24.9

12.8

25.3

23.9

18.7

23.8

19.6

1266SARAH L7

1.06145.7

36.5

9.7

37.5

7.4

360STONY P7

1.02140.6

905105S TAP

1.02140.2

2092HS_138

1.03142.1

11.4

21.2

11.5

21.6

35.7

32.0

35.8

31.6

14.8

364CARVEL01

1.01139.9

17.1

20.8

17.0

20.4

39.6

15.7

39.1

15.11.01140.0

4437TMPL2GA9

1.004.1

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.5

8651043L-X4

1.05251.1

155BENALTO4

1.05252.1

545.0

96.5

545.0

96.3

202.1

32.6

201.9

14.6

17.4

14.6

21.6

14.7

17.4

14.6

21.6

SW

122.3

39.5

201.9

39.5

201.6

46.5

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.6

4.6

13.2

4.6

27.9

4.6

13.2

4.6

28.0

505JASPER 4

1.02244.8

521PETROLIA

1.02244.5

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.5

58.7

19.6

58.8

23.9

193.7 193.6

33.3

320.7

31.7

312.3

7.3

109.6

SW

33.6

133WABAMUN4

337.2

16.6

339.5

27.3

137N CALDE4

1.02243.8

165.7

17.9

166.0

18.1227.0

31.8

223.2

18.7

1.05251.2

1.05251.1

512DOME 4

303.1

36.2

295.5

16.4

1.06254.3

1.02244.3

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.7

23.1

1.1 10.4

138N BARRH4

23.1

3344FT ASBN8

1.0025.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

0.9824.5

14.2 14.1

3.7

9914.1

3.7

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6

3360STONY A9

1.0225.6

23.6

5.4

23.4

3.5

23.6 23.4

3.5

23.4

3.5

9923.4

3.5

4.8

5.4

99

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

82.836

27.9

14.04A

379.0

96.8R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

59.0

343.6

111.7

23.4

11.7

5A367.0

123.4R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

13.4

346.6

71.9

3626.4

13.2

6A373.0

85.1R

29.2

36

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.5

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.2

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.8

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.5

269.1

71.8

269.2

48.4

429.7

87.4

430.4

4.9

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.2

330.4

17.0

330.4

17.6

330.4

17.0

330.4

17.6

516.4

100.5

517.3

27.4

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

26.0

389.8

95.5

387.2

24.7

388.7

94.9

361A

415.0

108.1R

3625.1

2A413.8

107.5R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

3640.4

320.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

17.7

375.8

34.9

3631.0

15.5 1407.7

33.2R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

19.1

377.5

34.7

3631.1

15.5 2A409.8

34.6R

1

Page 35: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A5-CONTINGENCY 452L(CONVERGED)

P1412

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 651.4 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility UpgradeBus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.4

63.7

30.6

63.5

24.1

437TMPL2GA7

1.00138.0

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.00138.0

36.1

12.3

36.2

12.6

134WABAMUN7

36.3

12.8

36.2

12.6

128.8

14.5

128.5

6.5

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.7

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.7

23.2

12.7

23.2

12.7

1.00138.0

41N BARRH7

1.03141.8

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.8

31.0

13.9

30.6

12.6

17.9

2.7

17.7

63.1

11.8

63.3

9.1

1266SARAH L7

1.06145.9

7.4

25.2

7.0

21.6

360STONY P7

0.95131.0

905105S TAP

0.95131.7

2092HS_138

1.04143.2

47.1

11.3

47.3

11.3

0.2

364CARVEL01

0.96132.9

53.2

12.7

52.9

12.6

77.1

21.3

75.2

18.71.00137.9

4437TMPL2GA9

0.994.1

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.8

8651043L-X4

1.05251.6

155BENALTO4

1.05252.3

530.9

84.7

530.9

84.5

197.8

29.5

197.6

8.4

17.6

8.4

21.5

8.4

17.6

8.4

21.6

SW

122.5

36.0

197.6

36.0

197.4

42.6

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.9

12.6

11.1

12.6

30.0

12.5

11.1

12.6

30.1

505JASPER 4

1.02245.3

521PETROLIA

1.02245.1

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.0

69.8

19.1

69.9

23.3

179.4 179.4

42.0

294.2

31.9

287.1

14.8

110.0

SW

42.1

133WABAMUN4

330.0

41.1

332.2

51.3

137N CALDE4

1.02244.1

151.5

26.8

151.8

26.7201.2

26.6

198.2

19.0

1.05251.6

1.04250.6

512DOME 4

276.2

37.3

269.8

24.4

1.06254.2

1.02244.7

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.7

222.7

33.2

220.2

35.1

195.2

44.0 45.5

138N BARRH4

197.1

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0024.9

14.2 14.1

3.7

9914.1

3.7

4360STONY P9

0.9523.8

3360STONY A9

0.9523.7

23.6

5.6

23.4

3.5

23.6 23.4

3.5

23.4

3.5

9923.4

3.5

4.8

5.7

99

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

79.336

27.9

14.04A

379.0

93.3R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

55.8

343.6

108.1

23.4

11.7

5A367.0

119.8R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

10.5

346.6

68.7

3626.4

13.2

6A373.0

81.9R

25.9

36

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.9

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.6

258ELLERSLI

1.05527.2

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.9

271.1

67.4

271.1

43.9

427.4

87.2

428.0

4.3

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.6

331.4

15.2

331.4

15.7

331.4

15.2

331.4

15.7

514.5

99.0

515.3

25.7

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

22.0

389.8

91.1

387.3

20.7

388.7

90.6

361A

415.0

103.7R

3625.1

2A413.8

103.2R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

3640.4

320.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

15.8

375.8

36.7

3631.0

15.5 1407.7

31.3R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

17.3

377.5

36.5

3631.1

15.5 2A409.8

32.8R

1

Page 36: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A6-CTG N-1 (SUNDANCE 5A XFMR T5)(CONVERGED)

P1412

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 1034.6 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility UpgradeBus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.3

76.4

28.6

76.1

20.8

437TMPL2GA7

1.01139.5

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.01139.8

45.9

6.1

46.1

6.2

134WABAMUN7

46.2

6.3

46.1

6.2

88.1

15.8

87.9

19.7

44FT ASBN7

1.02141.4

844ASBNE TP

1.02141.4

23.2

12.7

23.2

12.7

1.01139.5

41N BARRH7

1.03141.5

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.6

31.0

14.4

30.6

13.1

14.1

1.7

14.0

59.3

11.3

59.5

8.8

1266SARAH L7

1.06145.8

7.4

25.8

7.0

22.2

360STONY P7

1.02140.6

905105S TAP

1.02140.2

2092HS_138

1.03142.1

1.2

16.0

1.2

16.3

48.3

26.8

48.5

26.5

1.0

364CARVEL01

1.01139.8

4.4

15.7

4.4

15.1

26.6

11.2

26.4

9.91.01139.9

4437TMPL2GA9

1.004.1

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.4

8651043L-X4

1.05251.0

155BENALTO4

1.05252.6

572.7

96.1

572.6

95.8

213.8

32.9

213.6

43.8

18.2

43.6

19.4

44.0

18.2

43.7

19.4

SW

122.8

40.5

213.6

40.5

213.4

48.3

135SUNDANC4

1.05252.9

79.9

1.8

81.0

33.4

80.0

1.6

81.1

33.8

505JASPER 4

1.02244.9

521PETROLIA

1.02244.4

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.6

110.0

34.4

110.2

37.7

179.4 179.3

32.8

252.1

28.7

246.8

21.4

109.6

SW

32.9

133WABAMUN4

269.7

15.4

271.2

20.4

137N CALDE4

1.02243.9

151.5

17.7

151.7

17.5181.6

31.2

179.2

27.2

1.05251.0

1.05250.9

512DOME 4

224.1

36.1

219.8

34.1

1.06253.6

1.02244.3

488CHERHIL1

1.05252.9

215.2

35.7

212.9

36.9

188.0

45.2 47.3

138N BARRH4

189.8

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

0.9924.8

14.2 14.1

3.7

9914.1

3.7

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6

3360STONY A9

1.0225.6

23.6

5.4

23.4

3.5

23.6 23.4

3.5

23.4

3.5

9923.4

3.5

4.8

5.4

99

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

89.136

27.9

14.04A

379.0

103.1R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

5A

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

18.7

346.6

77.6

3626.4

13.2

6A373.0

90.8R

35.1

36

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.4

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.1

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.6

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.4

264.8

73.8

264.8

50.3

437.1

86.9

437.7

5.0

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.1

327.2

17.6

327.2

18.1

327.2

17.6

327.2

18.1

522.9

100.5

523.8

28.0

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

27.2

389.8

96.8

387.2

25.8

388.7

96.1

361A

415.0

109.4R

3625.1

2A413.8

108.7R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

3640.4

320.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

18.2

375.8

34.3

3631.0

15.5 1407.7

33.7R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

19.6

377.5

34.1

3631.1

15.5 2A409.8

35.1R

1

Page 37: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A7-SYSTEM NORMAL

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 560.7 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.3

55.1

24.4

54.9

18.9

437TMPL2GA7

1.03142.1

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.03142.7

47.0

0.4

47.2

0.6

134WABAMUN7

1.04143.0

47.3

0.8

47.2

0.6

95.0

3.8

94.8

7.9

44FT ASBN7

1.03142.0

844ASBNE TP

1.03142.0

18.1

11.3

18.1

11.3

1.03142.1

41N BARRH7

1.03142.0

934FLAT TAP

1.02141.4

29.3

13.6

28.9

12.2

16.1

4.1

16.0

56.7

13.3

56.9

11.0

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.5

10.8

23.4

10.4

19.7

360STONY P7

1.03142.4

905105S TAP

1.03142.3

2092HS_138

1.04143.4

16.3

12.2

16.4

12.6

22.8

22.6

22.9

21.8

1.4

364CARVEL01

20.6

12.2

20.5

11.7

36.4

8.0

36.1

7.0

1.03142.2

4437TMPL2GA9

1.024.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.06253.2

8651043L-X4

1.05252.0

155BENALTO4

1.05253.2

517.4

94.0

517.4

93.8

189.0

29.4

188.9

7.6

12.8

7.6

26.5

7.6

12.8

7.7

26.5

35.3

188.9

35.3

188.6

41.4

135SUNDANC4

1.06255.5

9.3

12.2

9.3

29.3

9.4

12.3

9.4

29.4

505JASPER 4

1.02245.9

521PETROLIA

1.02245.0

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.7

55.6

41.9

55.7

46.2

173.6 173.5

15.7

297.9

40.3

290.7

22.6

15.8

133WABAMUN4

306.4

29.8

308.2

37.5

137N CALDE4

1.02245.4

146.7

1.3

146.9

1.0211.4

33.6

208.1

24.3

1.05252.0

1.05252.8

512DOME 4

282.3

51.1

275.6

36.5

138N BARRH4

1.06254.3

1.02244.7

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.7

213.4

24.7

211.1

25.0

189.0

29.0

190.7

31.6

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

11.3 11.2

3.6

11.2

3.6

4360STONY P9

1.0425.9 3360

STONY A9

1.0425.9

19.6

5.2

19.5

3.8

19.6 19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

4.4

5.3

1.0125.2

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

64.527.9

14.0

379.0

78.5R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

42.1

343.6

93.2

23.4

11.7

367.0

104.9R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

2.1

346.6

55.5

26.4

13.2

373.0

68.7R

12.0

610KEEPHIL2

1.06530.6

630SUNNYB1

1.06531.3

258ELLERSLI

1.06528.1

510KEEPHIL3

1.06530.6

274.9

62.2

275.0

38.7

422.5

83.9

423.1

0.3

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06531.3

333.3

13.2

333.3

13.7

333.3

13.2

333.3

13.7

510.4

94.2

511.2

20.1

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

18.5

391.2

87.8

387.1

17.5

388.5

87.0

415.0

99.7R

24.1

412.6

99.0R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

12.5

375.7

40.0

31.0

15.5407.5

28.0R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

13.9

377.4

39.7

31.1

15.5409.6

29.4R

1

Page 38: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A8-CONTINGENCY 1045L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 569.5 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.8

36.1

24.3

36.0

20.1

437TMPL2GA7

1.03141.8

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.03142.3

42.5

0.0

42.6

0.4

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.6

42.7

0.6

42.6

0.4

107.6

4.4

107.4

9.7

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.9

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.9

18.1

11.3

18.1

11.3

1.03141.8

41N BARRH7

1.03142.0

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.9

27.3

13.0

27.0

11.4

27.2

6.2

26.9

65.7

14.8

66.0

11.8

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.5

8.8

22.7

8.5

18.9

360STONY P7

1.02141.3

905105S TAP

1.02141.3

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

32.9

15.5

33.0

15.8

6.2

26.0

6.3

25.2

4.0

364CARVEL01

37.3

15.2

37.1

14.9

53.6

10.0

52.8

10.0

1.02141.3

4437TMPL2GA9

1.014.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.2

8651043L-X4

1.05251.0

155BENALTO4

1.05252.8

551.5

112.8

551.5

112.5

198.9

29.7

198.7

4.8

11.8

4.8

27.3

4.9

11.8

4.8

27.4

36.3

198.7

36.3

198.4

43.1

135SUNDANC4

1.07255.7

38.8

14.4

38.6

25.9

38.9

14.6

38.6

25.8

505JASPER 4

1.01242.7

521PETROLIA

1.01242.8

955PDMAKER1

1.01242.7

215.8

33.6

216.7

33.1

43.0 43.0

1.82.2

133WABAMUN4

397.9

40.1

401.1

57.1

137N CALDE4

1.01243.0

16.4

14.6

16.4

16.5290.3

44.5

284.1

15.2

1.05251.0

1.05252.0

512DOME 4

372.0

64.6

360.5

24.2

138N BARRH4

1.06254.1

1.01243.0

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.6

226.0

22.5

223.5

24.3

201.2

29.6

203.1

30.9

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

11.3 11.2

3.6

11.2

3.6

4360STONY P9

1.0325.7 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.7

19.6

5.2

19.5

3.8

19.6 19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

4.4

5.3

1.0125.2

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

62.827.9

14.0

379.0

76.8R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

40.5

343.6

91.5

23.4

11.7

367.0

103.2R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

3.5

346.6

54.0

26.4

13.2

373.0

67.2R

10.4

610KEEPHIL2

1.06528.7

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.5

258ELLERSLI

1.05525.5

510KEEPHIL3

1.06528.7

277.7

78.2

277.8

55.0

435.1

96.3

435.8

14.6

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.5

326.4

16.9

326.4

17.5

326.4

16.9

326.4

17.5

524.3

111.2

525.1

39.4

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

26.9

391.2

96.9

387.1

25.8

388.5

96.1

415.0

108.8R

24.1

412.6

108.1R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

21.4

375.7

31.2

31.0

15.5407.5

36.9R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

22.8

377.4

31.0

31.1

15.5409.6

38.3R

1

Page 39: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A9-CONTINGENCY N. BARRH T4(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 562.2 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.3

54.0

24.6

53.8

19.1

437TMPL2GA7

1.03142.1

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.03142.6

47.4

0.5

47.6

0.7

134WABAMUN7

1.04142.9

47.7

0.8

47.6

0.7

96.6

4.1

96.4

8.4

44FT ASBN7

1.02140.7

844ASBNE TP

1.02140.7

18.1

11.2

18.1

11.2

1.03142.1

41N BARRH7

1.02140.1

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.3

2.1

6.0

2.2

3.9

9.1

1.6

9.2

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.5

20.3

15.1

20.7

11.5

360STONY P7

1.03142.3

905105S TAP

1.03142.2

2092HS_138

1.04143.4

17.5

12.7

17.5

13.1

21.7

23.2

21.8

22.3

4.4

364CARVEL01

21.7

12.7

21.6

12.2

37.6

8.5

37.2

7.5

1.03142.2

4437TMPL2GA9

1.024.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05253.2

8651043L-X4

1.05251.9

155BENALTO4

1.05253.2

519.9

94.4

519.8

94.2

189.9

29.4

189.7

6.5

12.9

6.6

26.4

6.6

12.9

6.6

26.4

35.4

189.7

35.4

189.5

41.6

135SUNDANC4

1.06255.4

11.1

12.6

11.1

28.9

11.2

12.7

11.1

28.9

505JASPER 4

1.02245.8

521PETROLIA

1.02244.9

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.6

57.0

41.1

57.1

45.4

181.3 181.2

14.6

304.5

40.3

297.0

20.8

14.8

133WABAMUN4

313.4

29.3

315.4

37.7

137N CALDE4

1.02245.3

154.4

0.1

154.6

0.1216.9

33.4

213.4

22.9

1.05252.0

1.05252.7

512DOME 4

288.0

50.8

281.1

34.9

138N BARRH4

1.06254.3

1.02244.7

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.7

174.0

21.9

172.4

17.7

151.0

18.3

152.1

24.2

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

11.3 11.2

3.6

11.2

3.6

4360STONY P9

1.0425.9 3360

STONY A9

1.0425.9

19.6

5.2

19.5

3.8

19.6 19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

4.4

5.3

1.0025.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

65.127.9

14.0

379.0

79.1R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

42.7

343.6

93.9

23.4

11.7

367.0

105.6R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

1.5

346.6

56.0

26.4

13.2

373.0

69.2R

12.6

610KEEPHIL2

1.06530.5

630SUNNYB1

1.06531.2

258ELLERSLI

1.06528.0

510KEEPHIL3

1.06530.5

274.5

62.8

274.6

39.3

423.0

84.3

423.6

0.7

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06531.2

333.1

13.4

333.1

14.0

333.1

13.4

333.1

14.0

510.8

94.8

511.6

20.7

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

18.9

391.2

88.2

387.1

17.9

388.5

87.5

415.0

100.1R

24.1

412.6

99.5R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

12.8

375.7

39.6

31.0

15.5407.5

28.3R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

14.3

377.4

39.4

31.1

15.5409.6

29.8R

1

Page 40: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A10-CONTINGENCY 1046L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 576.9 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.0

52.8

25.6

52.6

20.2

437TMPL2GA7

1.03141.7

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.03142.3

53.6

1.5

53.8

1.6

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.6

54.0

1.6

53.8

1.6

103.5

4.9

103.3

9.9

44FT ASBN7

1.02140.9

844ASBNE TP

1.02140.9

18.1

11.2

18.1

11.2

1.03141.7

41N BARRH7

1.02140.6

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.4

12.3

1.8

12.4

3.9

25.9

12.7

26.3

26.9

18.9

26.8

20.0

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.2

30.5

7.3

31.2

4.3

360STONY P7

1.03142.0

905105S TAP

1.03141.9

2092HS_138

1.04143.1

18.1

13.4

18.1

13.8

21.0

23.9

21.1

23.1

14.7

364CARVEL01

22.3

13.4

22.3

12.9

38.3

9.1

37.9

8.2

1.03141.9

4437TMPL2GA9

1.014.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.8

8651043L-X4

1.05251.6

155BENALTO4

1.05252.9

523.1

97.7

523.0

97.5

193.6

29.2

193.4

3.7

13.2

3.7

26.1

3.7

13.1

3.7

26.1

35.4

193.4

35.4

193.1

41.8

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.8

14.5

14.9

14.5

26.3

14.6

15.0

14.5

26.4

505JASPER 4

1.02245.2

521PETROLIA

1.02244.4

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.0

54.5

36.9

54.5

41.2

190.4 190.3

13.4

316.9

39.2

308.7

16.2

13.6

133WABAMUN4

328.9

27.3

331.1

37.1

137N CALDE4

1.02244.7

163.5

1.4

163.7

1.3225.4

32.2

221.7

19.8

1.05251.7

1.05252.0

512DOME 4

300.5

48.7

293.0

29.5

138N BARRH4

1.04249.7

1.02244.1

488CHERHIL1

1.04249.4

20.4

4.6

20.4

6.5

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

11.3 11.2

3.6

11.2

3.6

4360STONY P9

1.0325.9 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.9

19.6

5.2

19.5

3.8

19.6 19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

4.4

5.3

1.0125.2

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

71.427.9

14.0

379.0

85.4R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

48.5

343.6

100.2

23.4

11.7

367.0

111.9R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

3.8

346.6

61.7

26.4

13.2

373.0

74.9R

18.5

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.9

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.6

258ELLERSLI

1.05527.1

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.9

272.9

67.4

272.9

43.9

425.0

88.1

425.6

5.1

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.6

332.3

15.2

332.3

15.7

332.3

15.2

332.3

15.7

512.4

100.0

513.3

26.5

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

21.5

391.2

91.0

387.1

20.5

388.5

90.2

415.0

102.9R

24.1

412.6

102.2R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

15.9

375.7

36.6

31.0

15.5407.5

31.4R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

17.4

377.4

36.4

31.1

15.5409.6

32.9R

1

Page 41: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A11-CONTINGENCY 452L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 562.1 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.2

57.4

26.0

57.2

20.2

437TMPL2GA7

1.02140.7

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.02140.9

39.4

5.7

39.6

6.1

134WABAMUN7

1.02141.1

39.6

6.3

39.6

6.1

111.2

17.4

110.9

11.6

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.8

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.8

18.1

11.3

18.1

11.3

1.02140.7

41N BARRH7

1.03141.8

934FLAT TAP

1.02141.1

29.4

13.9

29.1

12.4

15.8

3.6

15.6

56.5

13.1

56.7

10.8

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.4

11.0

23.7

10.6

20.1

360STONY P7

0.98135.5

905105S TAP

0.99136.2

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

39.1

10.5

39.3

10.3

1.0

364CARVEL01

43.6

11.1

43.4

11.2

60.3

17.1

59.1

16.3

0.99137.1

4437TMPL2GA9

1.014.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05253.2

8651043L-X4

1.05252.0

155BENALTO4

1.05253.1

511.4

87.9

511.4

87.7

190.1

27.1

190.0

8.9

13.5

8.9

25.8

8.9

13.5

9.0

25.8

33.1

190.0

33.1

189.7

39.3

135SUNDANC4

1.06255.1

7.6

13.0

7.6

28.5

7.6

13.1

7.6

28.5

505JASPER 4

1.02245.6

521PETROLIA

1.02244.8

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.4

62.4

37.2

62.5

41.4

176.3 176.3

20.4

293.7

39.8

286.7

23.0

20.5

133WABAMUN4

315.8

46.3

317.9

55.1

137N CALDE4

1.02244.9

149.5

5.9

149.7

5.7204.6

28.8

201.6

20.8

1.05252.1

1.05251.7

512DOME 4

277.6

50.4

271.1

36.9

138N BARRH4

1.06254.0

1.02244.4

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.3

213.3

25.0

211.0

25.4

188.9

29.4

190.6

31.9

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

11.3 11.2

3.6

11.2

3.6

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6 3360

STONY A9

1.0225.6

19.6

5.2

19.5

3.8

19.6 19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

4.4

5.3

1.0125.2

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

68.227.9

14.0

379.0

82.2R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

45.6

343.6

97.0

23.4

11.7

367.0

108.7R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

1.1

346.6

58.8

26.4

13.2

373.0

72.0R

15.6

610KEEPHIL2

1.06530.3

630SUNNYB1

1.06531.0

258ELLERSLI

1.06527.7

510KEEPHIL3

1.06530.3

274.4

63.1

274.5

39.6

423.1

86.7

423.7

3.4

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06531.0

333.1

13.4

333.1

14.0

333.1

13.4

333.1

14.0

510.9

97.4

511.7

23.5

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

18.0

391.2

87.3

387.1

17.1

388.5

86.6

415.0

99.2R

24.1

412.6

98.6R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

13.7

375.7

38.7

31.0

15.5407.5

29.2R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

15.2

377.4

38.5

31.1

15.5409.6

30.7R

1

Page 42: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK PRE-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE A12-CTG N-1 (SUNDANCE 5A XFMR T5)(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 941.9 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.8

71.6

24.0

71.3

16.9

437TMPL2GA7

1.02141.3

947GAINTAP2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.3

964WHITE TP

1.03141.8

44.7

1.3

44.8

1.6

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.1

44.9

1.7

44.8

1.6

80.9

2.8

80.8

5.9

44FT ASBN7

1.02141.4

844ASBNE TP

1.02141.4

18.1

11.3

18.1

11.3

1.02141.3

41N BARRH7

1.02141.4

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.9

29.8

14.5

29.4

13.1

11.2

3.0

11.1

52.2

13.1

52.4

11.0

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.1

11.3

24.4

10.9

20.8

360STONY P7

1.03141.7

905105S TAP

1.03141.6

2092HS_138

1.03142.8

4.9

8.6

4.9

9.0

34.2

19.1

34.3

18.4

0.2

364CARVEL01

9.1

8.7

9.1

8.1

24.8

5.0

24.6

3.5

1.03141.5

4437TMPL2GA9

1.014.2

3.5

1.3

3.5

1.13.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.3

8651043L-X4

1.05251.0

155BENALTO4

1.05251.8

550.1

98.0

550.0

97.7

203.6

31.7

203.4

24.3

19.6

24.2

19.0

24.3

19.6

24.3

19.0

38.6

203.4

38.6

203.2

45.7

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.7

59.8

0.6

60.4

38.2

59.8

0.8

60.4

38.5

505JASPER 4

1.02244.8

521PETROLIA

1.02243.8

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.6

105.9

54.0

106.2

57.2

176.3 176.3

10.4

248.3

37.3

243.2

30.7

10.5

133WABAMUN4

261.0

28.5

262.4

32.9

137N CALDE4

1.02244.4

149.5

4.1

149.7

4.3180.1

31.3

177.7

27.6

1.05251.0

1.05251.3

512DOME 4

221.4

50.0

217.2

48.1

138N BARRH4

1.05253.1

1.01243.6

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.2

205.5

28.1

203.4

27.8

181.4

31.4

183.0

34.4

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

11.3 11.2

3.6

11.2

3.6

4360STONY P9

1.0325.8 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.8

19.6

5.2

19.5

3.8

19.6 19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

19.5

3.8

4.4

5.3

1.0025.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

81.327.9

14.0

379.0

95.3R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

12.1

346.6

70.5

26.4

13.2

373.0

83.7R

27.8

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.1

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.9

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.2

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.1

271.6

75.3

271.6

51.9

433.7

91.2

434.3

9.1

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.9

327.9

17.3

327.9

17.8

327.9

17.3

327.9

17.8

521.2

105.2

522.0

32.8

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

26.7

391.2

96.7

387.1

25.6

388.5

95.8

415.0

108.6R

24.1

412.6

107.8R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

19.4

375.7

33.1

31.0

15.5407.5

34.9R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

20.8

377.4

32.9

31.1

15.5409.6

36.3R

1

Page 43: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 27 June, 2016

Attachment B

Post-Project Power Flow Diagrams (Scenarios 3 to 4)

Page 44: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B1-SYSTEM NORMAL

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 532.2 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.5

60.0

28.3

59.7

22.2

1.01139.9

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.02140.6

55.2

0.5

55.5

0.4

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.9

55.6

0.4

55.5

0.4

106.6

5.1

106.4

10.4

44FT ASBN7

1.03142.0

844ASBNE TP

1.03142.0

22.2

12.0

22.2

11.9

1.01139.9

41N BARRH7

1.03142.0

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.9

30.1

14.2

29.8

12.8

19.4

2.5

19.2

63.1

12.1

63.3

9.4

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.1

7.6

24.8

7.2

21.1

360STONY P7

1.02141.0

905105S TAP

1.02140.7

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

9.5

16.4

9.5

16.7

35.5

26.5

35.7

26.0

0.1

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.02140.5

14.9

16.1

14.9

15.6

36.3

11.6

35.9

10.7

5437TMPL2GA10

0.984.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.6

8651043L-X4

1.05251.3

155BENALTO4

1.05252.3

538.8

95.2

538.8

94.9

196.6

31.0

196.4

9.9

16.5

9.9

22.6

9.9

16.5

9.9

22.6

37.5

196.4

37.5

196.2

44.1

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.2

9.8

10.7

9.8

30.5

9.8

10.7

9.8

30.6

505JASPER 4

1.02245.1

521PETROLIA

1.02244.7

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.8

60.7

22.9

60.8

27.2

176.5 176.5

39.8

300.6

35.5

293.3

16.7

39.9

133WABAMUN4

317.3

28.6

319.4

37.5

137N CALDE4

1.02244.0

148.7

24.7

148.9

24.5210.8

33.6

207.5

24.0

1.05251.4

1.05251.4

512DOME 4

283.6

41.1

276.9

26.2

138N BARRH4

1.06254.5

1.02244.5

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.0

221.6

33.8

219.1

35.6

195.2

43.8

197.1

45.4

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0025.0

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

1.0325.7

3360STONY A9

1.0325.7

22.5

5.1

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.5

5.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

77.027.9

14.0

379.0

91.0R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

53.7

343.6

105.9

23.4

11.7

367.0

117.6R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

8.5

346.6

66.7

26.4

13.2

373.0

79.9R

23.8

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.6

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.3

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.8

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.6

271.8

70.2

271.8

46.7

426.9

88.4

427.5

5.6

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.3

331.7

16.3

331.7

16.9

331.7

16.3

331.7

16.9

514.2

101.0

515.0

27.7

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

24.3

389.8

93.5

387.2

22.9

388.7

93.0

415.0

106.1R

25.1

413.8

105.6R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

17.2

375.8

35.3

31.0

15.5407.7

32.7R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

18.6

377.5

35.1

31.1

15.5409.8

34.1R

1

Page 45: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B2-CONTINGENCY 1045L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 540.6 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.1

40.7

28.7

40.5

24.0

1.01139.7

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.02140.3

50.8

0.3

51.0

0.2

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.7

51.1

0.2

51.0

0.2

119.1

6.0

118.9

12.6

44FT ASBN7

1.03142.0

844ASBNE TP

1.03142.0

22.2

12.0

22.2

11.9

1.01139.7

41N BARRH7

1.03142.0

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.5

28.1

13.5

27.8

12.0

30.5

4.8

30.1

72.2

13.8

72.4

10.3

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.1

5.6

23.9

5.3

20.2

360STONY P7

1.02140.2

905105S TAP

1.01140.0

2092HS_138

1.03141.5

25.9

20.5

26.0

20.8

19.1

30.8

19.2

30.1

2.9

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.01139.8

31.5

20.0

31.3

19.7

53.3

14.5

52.5

14.6

5437TMPL2GA10

0.984.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.0

8651043L-X4

1.04250.6

155BENALTO4

1.05252.1

573.3

108.3

573.3

108.0

207.1

33.1

206.9

22.7

16.0

22.7

22.6

22.8

16.0

22.7

22.6

40.3

206.9

40.3

206.6

47.7

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.5

20.0

13.7

19.9

27.3

20.0

13.8

20.0

27.3

505JASPER 4

1.01242.6

521PETROLIA

1.01243.3

955PDMAKER1

1.01242.5

223.1

15.3

224.0

14.6

45.6 45.6

28.327.9

133WABAMUN4

409.6

35.7

413.0

54.1

137N CALDE4

1.01242.2

18.0

15.0

18.0

13.0290.5

41.7

284.3

11.9

1.04250.7

1.05250.8

512DOME 4

374.7

49.6

363.1

8.6

138N BARRH4

1.06254.3

1.01243.4

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.0

234.2

31.6

231.4

34.9

207.2

44.4

209.4

44.7

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0025.0

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

1.0225.5

3360STONY A9

1.0225.5

22.5

5.1

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.5

5.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

74.227.9

14.0

379.0

88.2R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

51.1

343.6

103.0

23.4

11.7

367.0

114.7R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

6.2

346.6

64.2

26.4

13.2

373.0

77.4R

21.2

610KEEPHIL2

1.06528.6

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.5

258ELLERSLI

1.05525.6

510KEEPHIL3

1.06528.6

274.5

80.5

274.5

57.2

440.0

93.7

440.7

12.3

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.5

324.5

18.0

324.5

18.5

324.5

18.0

324.5

18.5

528.5

109.1

529.4

37.6

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

30.1

389.8

99.9

387.2

28.7

388.7

99.2

415.0

112.5R

25.1

413.8

111.8R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

21.6

375.8

31.0

31.0

15.5407.7

37.1R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

23.0

377.5

30.8

31.1

15.5409.8

38.5R

1

Page 46: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B3-CONTINGENCY N. BARRH T4(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 534.5 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.5

58.8

28.4

58.5

22.4

1.01139.8

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.02140.5

55.7

0.5

55.9

0.4

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.9

56.1

0.4

55.9

0.4

108.3

5.3

108.1

10.8

44FT ASBN7

1.01140.1

844ASBNE TP

1.01140.1

22.2

12.0

22.2

12.0

1.01139.8

41N BARRH7

1.01139.2

934FLAT TAP

1.01139.2

5.0

6.9

5.0

4.8

8.6

2.3

8.6

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.0

27.2

16.8

27.8

13.8

360STONY P7

1.02140.9

905105S TAP

1.02140.7

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

10.8

16.8

10.8

17.2

34.3

27.0

34.4

26.5

5.0

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.02140.4

16.2

16.6

16.1

16.1

37.6

12.0

37.1

11.2

5437TMPL2GA10

0.984.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.6

8651043L-X4

1.05251.3

155BENALTO4

1.05252.3

541.6

95.9

541.5

95.7

197.6

31.1

197.4

11.2

16.5

11.1

22.5

11.2

16.5

11.2

22.5

37.6

197.4

37.6

197.2

44.3

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.1

8.0

11.1

8.0

30.1

7.9

11.1

8.0

30.1

505JASPER 4

1.02244.9

521PETROLIA

1.02244.6

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.7

62.3

21.8

62.4

26.1

185.1 185.0

39.0

308.0

35.9

300.2

15.1

39.2

133WABAMUN4

325.1

28.4

327.3

38.0

137N CALDE4

1.02243.8

157.2

23.8

157.4

23.8216.8

33.7

213.3

22.8

1.05251.3

1.05251.3

512DOME 4

290.0

41.0

283.0

24.6

138N BARRH4

1.06254.7

1.02244.4

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.2

178.2

32.9

176.6

29.5

153.4

33.9

154.5

39.4

3344FT ASBN8

1.0025.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

0.9824.4

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

1.0325.7

3360STONY A9

1.0325.7

22.5

5.1

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.6

5.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

77.627.9

14.0

379.0

91.6R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

54.2

343.6

106.4

23.4

11.7

367.0

118.1R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

9.0

346.6

67.2

26.4

13.2

373.0

80.4R

24.3

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.5

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.2

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.7

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.5

271.3

71.0

271.4

47.6

427.5

88.9

428.1

6.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.2

331.5

16.6

331.5

17.2

331.5

16.6

331.5

17.2

514.6

101.8

515.5

28.6

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

24.8

389.8

94.1

387.2

23.5

388.7

93.5

415.0

106.7R

25.1

413.8

106.1R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

17.7

375.8

34.8

31.0

15.5407.7

33.2R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

19.1

377.5

34.6

31.1

15.5409.8

34.6R

1

Page 47: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B4-CONTINGENCY 1046L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 549.7 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.3

57.5

29.9

57.3

23.9

1.01139.5

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.02140.3

62.1

1.4

62.4

1.1

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.7

62.6

0.9

62.4

1.1

115.3

6.3

115.0

12.6

44FT ASBN7

1.02140.6

844ASBNE TP

1.02140.6

22.2

12.0

22.2

12.0

1.01139.5

41N BARRH7

1.02140.1

934FLAT TAP

1.01139.7

13.3

0.7

13.4

2.7

24.3

13.2

24.6

24.0

18.4

23.9

19.4

1266SARAH L7

1.06145.8

35.6

9.3

36.5

6.8

360STONY P7

1.02140.9

905105S TAP

1.02140.6

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

11.2

18.1

11.2

18.5

33.8

28.3

34.0

27.8

15.2

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.02140.3

16.6

17.8

16.5

17.3

38.0

13.2

37.6

12.4

5437TMPL2GA10

0.984.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.5

8651043L-X4

1.05251.2

155BENALTO4

1.05252.1

544.7

95.4

544.7

95.1

201.9

32.4

201.7

14.2

17.4

14.2

21.6

14.3

17.4

14.3

21.6

39.2

201.7

39.2

201.5

46.2

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.5

4.5

13.6

4.5

27.5

4.5

13.6

4.5

27.6

505JASPER 4

1.02244.8

521PETROLIA

1.02244.5

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.6

59.4

18.4

59.5

22.7

193.9 193.8

34.0

320.3

31.0

311.9

6.8

34.3

133WABAMUN4

340.6

23.0

342.9

34.1

137N CALDE4

1.02243.8

165.9

18.6

166.2

18.8225.3

29.3

221.6

16.7

1.05251.2

1.04250.8

512DOME 4

302.6

35.4

295.0

15.7

138N BARRH4

1.06254.7

1.02244.3

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.2

22.1

1.7

22.1

9.9

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

0.9824.6

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

1.0325.6

3360STONY A9

1.0325.6

22.5

5.1

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.6

5.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

83.327.9

14.0

379.0

97.3R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

59.5

343.6

112.2

23.4

11.7

367.0

123.9R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

13.8

346.6

72.3

26.4

13.2

373.0

85.5R

29.7

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.5

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.3

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.8

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.5

269.4

71.3

269.4

47.9

429.8

87.3

430.4

4.7

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.3

330.5

16.9

330.5

17.4

330.5

16.9

330.5

17.4

516.5

100.2

517.4

27.1

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

25.6

389.8

95.0

387.2

24.2

388.7

94.4

415.0

107.6R

25.1

413.8

107.0R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

17.4

375.8

35.2

31.0

15.5407.7

32.9R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

18.8

377.5

35.0

31.1

15.5409.8

34.3R

1

Page 48: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B5-CONTINGENCY 452L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 533.6 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.5

63.3

30.3

63.1

23.8

1.00138.3

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.00138.7

44.2

5.4

44.4

5.6

134WABAMUN7

1.01138.8

44.5

5.7

44.4

5.6

132.8

19.9

132.5

11.6

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.9

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.9

22.2

12.0

22.2

12.0

1.00138.3

41N BARRH7

1.03141.9

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.9

30.6

14.4

30.2

13.0

18.2

2.6

18.1

62.4

12.4

62.6

9.7

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.0

8.0

24.9

7.6

21.3

360STONY P7

0.96132.3

905105S TAP

0.96133.0

2092HS_138

1.04143.2

45.0

10.6

45.2

10.5

0.0

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

0.97134.1

50.8

11.8

50.5

11.7

73.5

19.5

71.8

17.4

5437TMPL2GA10

0.974.0

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.8

8651043L-X4

1.05251.6

155BENALTO4

1.05252.4

530.9

84.9

530.9

84.7

197.7

29.4

197.5

8.1

17.5

8.1

21.7

8.2

17.5

8.2

21.7

35.9

197.5

35.9

197.2

42.5

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.9

12.3

11.4

12.4

29.7

12.3

11.4

12.3

29.8

505JASPER 4

1.02245.3

521PETROLIA

1.02245.1

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.0

69.9

18.6

70.0

22.8

179.6 179.6

42.4

294.2

31.8

287.1

14.7

42.5

133WABAMUN4

332.9

45.3

335.2

55.9

137N CALDE4

1.02244.1

151.7

27.3

152.0

27.1200.2

25.3

197.2

17.9

1.05251.6

1.04250.5

512DOME 4

276.2

37.1

269.8

24.2

138N BARRH4

1.06254.3

1.02244.7

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.8

221.1

34.4

218.6

36.1

194.7

44.4

196.6

46.0

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0024.9

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

0.9624.0

3360STONY A9

0.9624.0

22.5

5.3

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.5

5.3

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

79.427.9

14.0

379.0

93.4R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

56.0

343.6

108.3

23.4

11.7

367.0

120.0R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

10.6

346.6

68.9

26.4

13.2

373.0

82.1R

26.1

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.9

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.6

258ELLERSLI

1.05527.2

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.9

271.3

67.3

271.4

43.8

427.5

87.2

428.1

4.3

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.6

331.5

15.1

331.5

15.7

331.5

15.1

331.5

15.7

514.6

99.0

515.5

25.6

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

21.9

389.8

91.0

387.3

20.6

388.7

90.4

415.0

103.6R

25.1

413.8

103.0R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

15.7

375.8

36.8

31.0

15.5407.7

31.2R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

17.2

377.5

36.6

31.1

15.5409.8

32.7R

1

Page 49: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B6-CTG N-1 (SUNDANCE 5A XFMR T5)(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 917.0 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.1

76.4

28.5

76.1

20.7

1.01139.2

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.01139.8

53.1

0.9

53.3

0.9

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.1

53.5

0.9

53.3

0.9

92.8

4.4

92.6

8.6

44FT ASBN7

1.02141.4

844ASBNE TP

1.02141.4

22.2

12.0

22.2

12.0

1.01139.2

41N BARRH7

1.02141.4

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.5

30.6

15.0

30.3

13.7

14.3

1.6

14.2

58.5

12.1

58.7

9.6

1266SARAH L7

1.06145.7

8.1

25.7

7.7

22.1

360STONY P7

1.02140.6

905105S TAP

1.02140.3

2092HS_138

1.03141.9

1.9

13.5

1.8

13.9

46.9

23.7

47.1

23.4

1.1

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.01139.9

3.5

13.3

3.5

12.8

24.7

9.3

24.5

7.9

5437TMPL2GA10

0.984.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.1

8651043L-X4

1.04250.6

155BENALTO4

1.05251.0

571.8

94.2

571.8

93.9

211.8

35.6

211.6

42.3

23.6

42.1

13.7

42.5

23.7

42.2

13.7

43.1

211.6

43.1

211.3

50.9

135SUNDANC4

1.05252.4

78.7

3.3

79.8

38.2

78.7

3.5

79.8

38.5

505JASPER 4

1.02244.5

521PETROLIA

1.02244.1

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.3

111.2

33.2

111.5

36.5

179.6 179.5

33.0

251.0

28.1

245.8

20.8

33.1

133WABAMUN4

272.4

23.7

273.9

29.1

137N CALDE4

1.01243.6

151.7

17.9

151.9

17.7179.6

28.2

177.2

24.4

1.04250.6

1.04250.1

512DOME 4

222.7

35.1

218.5

33.3

138N BARRH4

1.06253.4

1.02243.9

488CHERHIL1

1.05252.6

213.5

37.5

211.2

38.5

187.3

46.3

189.1

48.4

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

0.9924.8

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6

3360STONY A9

1.0225.6

22.5

5.1

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.6

5.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

93.327.9

14.0

379.0

107.3R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

22.2

346.6

81.3

26.4

13.2

373.0

94.5R

39.0

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.0

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.8

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.2

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.0

269.1

78.5

269.2

55.1

439.4

88.8

440.0

7.1

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.8

325.6

18.4

325.6

19.0

325.6

18.4

325.6

19.0

526.4

103.6

527.3

31.6

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

30.5

389.8

100.4

387.2

29.1

388.7

99.7

415.0

113.0R

25.1

413.8

112.3R

25.2

12.6

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

19.9

375.8

32.6

31.0

15.5407.7

35.4R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

21.3

377.5

32.5

31.1

15.5409.8

36.8R

1

Page 50: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2016-17 WINTER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B7-CTG N-1 (KEEPHILLS #2 XFMR G2)(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 973.0 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate B1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02140.5

34.5

28.3

34.4

24.0

1.01139.5

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.02140.2

52.5

0.5

52.7

0.5

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.6

52.9

0.5

52.7

0.5

112.2

4.9

112.0

10.9

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.8

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.8

22.2

12.0

22.2

12.0

1.01139.6

41N BARRH7

1.03141.8

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.7

29.6

14.2

29.3

12.8

21.5

3.3

21.3

64.7

12.9

64.9

10.0

1266SARAH L7

1.06146.0

7.1

24.8

6.7

21.1

360STONY P7

1.02140.4

905105S TAP

1.02140.1

2092HS_138

1.03141.7

17.7

18.3

17.7

18.6

27.4

28.5

27.5

27.9

0.8

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.01139.9

23.1

17.9

23.0

17.5

44.7

13.0

44.1

12.5

5437TMPL2GA10

0.984.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05251.6

8651043L-X4

1.04249.6

155BENALTO4

1.05251.3

422.0

78.6

421.9

78.5

120.0

50.9

119.8

95.1

22.7

93.9

8.5

95.4

22.8

94.2

8.5

53.8

119.8

53.8

119.6

56.8

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.7

44.7

1.0

45.1

38.0

44.7

0.9

45.1

38.2

505JASPER 4

1.02244.4

521PETROLIA

1.02243.9

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.2

37.9

22.6

37.9

27.2

171.2 171.1

34.6

319.1

36.0

310.7

12.0

34.6

133WABAMUN4

333.9

27.7

336.1

38.2

137N CALDE4

1.01243.4

143.3

19.6

143.5

19.3221.7

32.6

218.0

20.6

1.04249.6

1.05250.8

512DOME 4

300.1

41.9

292.6

22.6

138N BARRH4

1.06254.1

1.02243.8

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.5

223.2

34.6

220.7

36.6

196.7

45.1

198.6

46.5

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0024.9

13.6 13.5

3.5

13.5

3.5

4360STONY P9

1.0225.6

3360STONY A9

1.0225.6

22.5

5.1

22.4

3.3

22.5 22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

22.4

3.3

4.6

5.1

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

81.927.9

14.0

379.0

95.9R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

58.3

343.6

110.8

23.4

11.7

367.0

122.5R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

12.7

346.6

71.1

26.4

13.2

373.0

84.3R

28.4

610KEEPHIL2

1.06528.8

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.7

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.1

510KEEPHIL3

1.06528.8

311.6

82.0

311.6

59.2

390.2

89.6

390.8

4.8

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.7

345.5

19.9

345.5

20.5

345.5

19.9

345.5

20.5

486.7

105.3

487.5

30.2

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

39.0

389.8

109.7

415.0

122.3R

25.2

12.6

388.4

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.7

20.5

375.8

32.1

31.0

15.5407.7

36.0R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.7

21.9

377.5

31.9

31.1

15.5409.8

37.4R

1

Page 51: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B8-SYSTEM NORMAL

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 556.7 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.3

54.6

24.4

54.5

18.9

1.03141.6

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.03142.4

53.3

2.4

53.6

2.3

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.8

53.7

2.3

53.6

2.3

98.0

1.4

97.8

5.8

44FT ASBN7

1.03142.2

844ASBNE TP

1.03142.2

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.03141.6

41N BARRH7

1.03142.2

934FLAT TAP

1.03141.5

29.0

14.0

28.6

12.6

16.4

3.9

16.3

56.1

13.9

56.2

11.6

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.6

11.5

23.1

11.1

19.4

360STONY P7

1.03142.4

905105S TAP

1.03142.3

2092HS_138

1.04143.4

14.7

12.5

14.8

12.9

22.2

22.3

22.3

21.51.3

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.03142.2

18.7

12.6

18.7

12.1

33.7

8.9

33.4

7.7

5437TMPL2GA10

1.004.2

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.06253.2

8651043L-X4

1.05252.0

155BENALTO4

1.06253.2

517.3

93.8

517.2

93.5

188.9

29.4

188.7

8.0

12.8

8.0

26.5

8.1

12.8

8.1

26.6

35.3

188.7

35.3

188.4

41.4

135SUNDANC4

1.06255.5

9.6

12.3

9.6

29.3

9.7

12.3

9.6

29.3

505JASPER 4

1.02245.9

521PETROLIA

1.02245.0

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.8

55.9

41.7

56.0

46.0

173.7 173.6

15.8

297.7

40.1

290.5

22.5

15.9

133WABAMUN4

308.5

31.5

310.5

39.5

137N CALDE4

1.02245.4

146.8

1.4

147.0

1.1210.5

32.9

207.3

23.7

1.05252.0

1.05252.7

512DOME 4

282.1

50.9

275.4

36.4

138N BARRH4

1.06254.5

1.02244.8

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.8

211.8

25.8

209.6

25.9

188.6

29.5

190.3

32.0

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0025.0

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0426.0 3360

STONY A9

1.0425.9

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

64.527.9

14.0

379.0

78.5R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

42.1

343.6

93.3

23.4

11.7

367.0

105.0R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

2.0

346.6

55.5

26.4

13.2

373.0

68.7R

12.0

610KEEPHIL2

1.06530.6

630SUNNYB1

1.06531.3

258ELLERSLI

1.06528.1

510KEEPHIL3

1.06530.6

275.2

62.0

275.3

38.5

422.6

83.7

423.2

0.1

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06531.3

333.5

13.1

333.5

13.7

333.5

13.1

333.5

13.7

510.6

94.0

511.4

19.9

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

18.3

391.2

87.6

387.1

17.4

388.5

86.9

415.0

99.5R

24.1

412.6

98.9R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

12.3

375.7

40.2

31.0

15.5407.5

27.8R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

13.8

377.4

39.9

31.1

15.5409.6

29.3R

1

Page 52: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B9-CONTINGENCY 1045L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 565.4 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.8

35.7

24.4

35.6

20.2

1.02141.3

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.03142.0

48.8

2.8

49.0

2.6

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.4

49.1

2.5

49.0

2.6

110.6

2.0

110.4

7.6

44FT ASBN7

1.03142.1

844ASBNE TP

1.03142.1

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.02141.3

41N BARRH7

1.03142.1

934FLAT TAP

1.02141.0

26.9

13.4

26.6

11.8

27.5

6.0

27.2

65.1

15.3

65.3

12.4

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.5

9.5

22.4

9.2

18.6

360STONY P7

1.02141.3

905105S TAP

1.02141.3

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

31.3

15.8

31.4

16.1

5.6

25.6

5.7

24.73.9

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.02141.3

35.5

15.5

35.3

15.2

50.9

10.9

50.1

10.7

5437TMPL2GA10

1.004.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.2

8651043L-X4

1.05251.0

155BENALTO4

1.05252.8

551.4

112.6

551.3

112.4

198.8

29.7

198.6

4.5

11.8

4.5

27.3

4.5

11.8

4.5

27.4

36.3

198.6

36.3

198.4

43.1

135SUNDANC4

1.07255.7

39.0

14.5

38.8

25.8

39.1

14.7

38.9

25.7

505JASPER 4

1.01242.7

521PETROLIA

1.01242.9

955PDMAKER1

1.01242.7

215.9

33.4

216.9

32.9

43.2 43.2

1.62.0

133WABAMUN4

400.0

41.8

403.3

59.0

137N CALDE4

1.01243.0

16.6

14.4

16.6

16.3289.4

43.8

283.2

14.8

1.05251.0

1.05251.9

512DOME 4

371.7

64.4

360.2

24.1

138N BARRH4

1.06254.2

1.01243.0

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.7

224.4

23.5

221.9

25.2

200.7

30.0

202.7

31.3

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0025.0

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0325.7 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.7

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

62.927.9

14.0

379.0

76.9R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

40.6

343.6

91.6

23.4

11.7

367.0

103.3R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

3.4

346.6

54.1

26.4

13.2

373.0

67.3R

10.5

610KEEPHIL2

1.06528.7

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.5

258ELLERSLI

1.05525.6

510KEEPHIL3

1.06528.7

277.8

78.1

277.8

54.9

435.1

96.2

435.7

14.6

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.5

326.7

17.0

326.7

17.6

326.7

17.0

326.7

17.6

524.2

111.1

525.1

39.3

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

26.8

391.2

96.8

387.1

25.7

388.5

96.0

415.0

108.7R

24.1

412.6

108.0R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

21.3

375.7

31.3

31.0

15.5407.5

36.8R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

22.7

377.4

31.1

31.1

15.5409.6

38.2R

1

Page 53: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B10-CONTINGENCY N. BARRH T4(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 558.0 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.3

53.5

24.6

53.4

19.2

1.03141.6

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.03142.3

53.7

2.3

54.0

2.3

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.7

54.1

2.3

54.0

2.3

99.6

1.7

99.4

6.3

44FT ASBN7

1.02141.0

844ASBNE TP

1.02141.0

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.03141.6

41N BARRH7

1.02140.4

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.4

2.1

6.2

2.1

4.0

8.5

2.1

8.6

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.6

19.3

14.6

19.6

10.9

360STONY P7

1.03142.4

905105S TAP

1.03142.2

2092HS_138

1.04143.4

15.9

13.0

15.9

13.4

21.1

22.8

21.2

22.04.8

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.03142.1

19.9

13.1

19.8

12.6

34.9

9.3

34.5

8.2

5437TMPL2GA10

1.004.2

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05253.2

8651043L-X4

1.05251.9

155BENALTO4

1.05253.2

519.6

94.2

519.6

94.0

189.7

29.4

189.5

7.0

12.9

7.0

26.4

7.0

12.9

7.0

26.5

35.4

189.5

35.4

189.3

41.6

135SUNDANC4

1.06255.4

11.4

12.7

11.4

28.7

11.4

12.8

11.4

28.8

505JASPER 4

1.02245.8

521PETROLIA

1.02244.9

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.6

57.3

40.9

57.4

45.2

181.3 181.2

14.7

304.3

40.1

296.8

20.7

14.8

133WABAMUN4

315.5

31.0

317.5

39.5

137N CALDE4

1.02245.3

154.4

0.1

154.6

0.0215.9

32.7

212.5

22.4

1.05252.0

1.05252.6

512DOME 4

287.7

50.6

280.8

34.7

138N BARRH4

1.06254.3

1.02244.7

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.8

172.8

22.4

171.3

18.1

150.9

18.3

152.0

24.2

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0125.2

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0425.9 3360

STONY A9

1.0425.9

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

65.227.9

14.0

379.0

79.2R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

42.8

343.6

94.0

23.4

11.7

367.0

105.7R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

1.4

346.6

56.1

26.4

13.2

373.0

69.3R

12.7

610KEEPHIL2

1.06530.5

630SUNNYB1

1.06531.2

258ELLERSLI

1.06528.0

510KEEPHIL3

1.06530.5

274.8

62.7

274.9

39.2

423.1

84.2

423.7

0.7

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06531.2

333.3

13.4

333.3

14.0

333.3

13.4

333.3

14.0

511.0

94.7

511.8

20.7

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

18.7

391.2

88.1

387.1

17.8

388.5

87.3

415.0

100.0R

24.1

412.6

99.3R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

12.7

375.7

39.8

31.0

15.5407.5

28.2R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

14.2

377.4

39.5

31.1

15.5409.6

29.7R

1

Page 54: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B11-CONTINGENCY 1046L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 572.5 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.0

52.4

25.6

52.2

20.3

1.02141.2

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.03142.0

59.8

1.2

60.1

1.4

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.4

60.3

1.5

60.1

1.4

106.5

2.5

106.3

7.7

44FT ASBN7

1.02140.7

844ASBNE TP

1.02140.7

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.02141.2

41N BARRH7

1.02140.2

934FLAT TAP

1.02140.2

12.8

0.1

12.8

2.0

25.5

11.3

25.9

27.6

15.3

27.5

16.3

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.2

29.9

8.5

30.6

5.5

360STONY P7

1.03142.1

905105S TAP

1.03141.9

2092HS_138

1.04143.1

16.5

13.7

16.6

14.1

20.4

23.5

20.5

22.713.3

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.03141.8

20.5

13.7

20.5

13.3

35.6

9.9

35.2

8.9

5437TMPL2GA10

0.994.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.9

8651043L-X4

1.05251.6

155BENALTO4

1.05252.9

522.8

97.7

522.8

97.5

193.3

29.2

193.2

4.2

13.1

4.2

26.2

4.2

13.1

4.2

26.2

35.4

193.2

35.4

192.9

41.8

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.8

14.8

15.1

14.8

26.2

14.9

15.2

14.8

26.2

505JASPER 4

1.02245.2

521PETROLIA

1.02244.4

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.0

54.7

36.5

54.8

40.8

190.4 190.3

13.8

316.6

39.2

308.4

16.2

14.0

133WABAMUN4

330.9

29.1

333.1

39.2

137N CALDE4

1.02244.7

163.5

1.0

163.7

0.9224.4

31.6

220.7

19.4

1.05251.7

1.05251.9

512DOME 4

300.2

48.6

292.6

29.4

138N BARRH4

1.05251.4

1.02244.1

488CHERHIL1

1.05251.2

19.3

5.2

19.3

6.1

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0125.2

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0425.9 3360

STONY A9

1.0425.9

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

71.527.9

14.0

379.0

85.5R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

48.7

343.6

100.3

23.4

11.7

367.0

112.0R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

3.9

346.6

61.8

26.4

13.2

373.0

75.0R

18.7

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.9

630SUNNYB1

1.06530.6

258ELLERSLI

1.05527.1

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.9

273.2

67.4

273.2

43.9

425.1

88.2

425.7

5.1

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06530.6

332.4

15.2

332.4

15.7

332.4

15.2

332.4

15.7

512.6

100.0

513.4

26.5

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

21.4

391.2

91.0

387.1

20.4

388.5

90.2

415.0

102.9R

24.1

412.6

102.2R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

15.8

375.7

36.7

31.0

15.5407.5

31.3R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

17.3

377.4

36.4

31.1

15.5409.6

32.8R

1

Page 55: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B12-CONTINGENCY 452L(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 558.0 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03142.2

56.9

26.0

56.7

20.2

1.02140.2

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.02140.7

46.0

2.8

46.1

3.0

134WABAMUN7

1.02140.9

46.2

3.1

46.1

3.0

113.7

19.4

113.5

13.3

44FT ASBN7

1.03142.0

844ASBNE TP

1.03142.0

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.02140.2

41N BARRH7

1.03142.0

934FLAT TAP

1.02141.2

29.1

14.3

28.8

12.9

16.1

3.5

16.0

55.9

13.7

56.0

11.4

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.4

11.7

23.4

11.3

19.7

360STONY P7

0.98135.7

905105S TAP

0.99136.3

2092HS_138

1.03142.3

37.0

9.8

37.1

9.6

0.8

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

0.99137.2

41.2

10.3

41.0

10.5

56.8

15.6

55.8

15.2

5437TMPL2GA10

0.994.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05253.2

8651043L-X4

1.05252.0

155BENALTO4

1.05253.1

511.4

87.8

511.3

87.6

189.9

27.2

189.8

9.3

13.5

9.3

25.8

9.3

13.4

9.3

25.9

33.2

189.8

33.2

189.5

39.3

135SUNDANC4

1.06255.1

7.9

13.1

7.9

28.4

7.9

13.1

7.9

28.4

505JASPER 4

1.02245.6

521PETROLIA

1.02244.9

955PDMAKER1

1.02245.4

62.5

37.1

62.6

41.3

176.4 176.3

20.4

293.7

39.7

286.6

22.9

20.5

133WABAMUN4

317.7

47.7

319.8

56.7

137N CALDE4

1.02245.0

149.5

6.0

149.7

5.7204.0

28.3

200.9

20.4

1.05252.1

1.05251.7

512DOME 4

277.4

50.3

271.0

36.8

138N BARRH4

1.06254.1

1.02244.5

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.4

211.7

26.1

209.5

26.2

188.5

29.9

190.2

32.4

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0025.0

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0325.7 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.7

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

68.227.9

14.0

379.0

82.2R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

45.6

343.6

97.0

23.4

11.7

367.0

108.7R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

1.1

346.6

58.8

26.4

13.2

373.0

72.0R

15.5

610KEEPHIL2

1.06530.4

630SUNNYB1

1.06531.0

258ELLERSLI

1.06527.7

510KEEPHIL3

1.06530.4

274.7

63.0

274.8

39.5

423.2

86.6

423.8

3.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06531.0

333.2

13.4

333.2

13.9

333.2

13.4

333.2

13.9

511.1

97.2

511.9

23.3

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

17.9

391.2

87.2

387.1

17.0

388.5

86.5

415.0

99.1R

24.1

412.6

98.5R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

13.6

375.7

38.9

31.0

15.5407.5

29.1R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

15.0

377.4

38.6

31.1

15.5409.6

30.5R

1

Page 56: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B13-CTG N-1 (SUNDANCE 5A XFMR T5)(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 937.5 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.03141.8

71.2

24.0

70.9

17.0

1.02140.8

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.03141.5

51.0

1.5

51.2

1.4

134WABAMUN7

1.03141.9

51.3

1.3

51.2

1.4

84.0

0.3

83.8

3.7

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.6

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.6

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.02140.8

41N BARRH7

1.03141.5

934FLAT TAP

1.02141.0

29.4

14.9

29.1

13.5

11.5

2.8

11.4

51.6

13.6

51.7

11.6

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.2

12.0

24.1

11.5

20.5

360STONY P7

1.03141.8

905105S TAP

1.03141.6

2092HS_138

1.03142.8

3.4

8.9

3.4

9.4

33.6

18.7

33.7

18.10.0

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.02141.4

7.3

9.1

7.3

8.5

22.1

5.8

21.9

4.3

5437TMPL2GA10

0.994.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05252.3

8651043L-X4

1.05251.0

155BENALTO4

1.05251.8

549.9

97.8

549.8

97.5

203.5

31.7

203.3

23.9

19.6

23.8

19.0

24.0

19.6

23.9

19.0

38.6

203.3

38.6

203.1

45.7

135SUNDANC4

1.06253.7

59.5

0.5

60.2

38.1

59.5

0.6

60.2

38.4

505JASPER 4

1.02244.8

521PETROLIA

1.02243.8

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.6

106.1

53.8

106.4

57.0

176.4 176.4

10.6

248.2

37.2

243.0

30.7

10.7

133WABAMUN4

263.3

30.3

264.7

34.8

137N CALDE4

1.02244.4

149.6

3.9

149.8

4.1179.3

30.6

176.9

27.1

1.05251.1

1.05251.2

512DOME 4

221.2

49.8

217.0

48.0

138N BARRH4

1.06253.3

1.01243.6

488CHERHIL1

1.06253.3

203.9

29.1

201.8

28.7

181.0

31.8

182.6

34.8

3344FT ASBN8

1.0125.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0125.2

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0325.8 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.8

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.1351.1

81.327.9

14.0

379.0

95.3R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

12.2

346.6

70.6

26.4

13.2

373.0

83.8R

27.8

610KEEPHIL2

1.06529.1

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.9

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.2

510KEEPHIL3

1.06529.1

271.7

75.2

271.7

51.8

433.7

91.1

434.3

9.0

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.9

328.1

17.3

328.1

17.9

328.1

17.3

328.1

17.9

521.2

105.1

522.1

32.7

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

26.6

391.2

96.6

387.1

25.5

388.5

95.7

415.0

108.5R

24.1

412.6

107.7R

23.8

11.9

12.0

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.3

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

19.3

375.7

33.2

31.0

15.5407.5

34.8R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

20.7

377.4

33.1

31.1

15.5409.6

36.2R

1

Page 57: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

2017 SUMMER PEAK POST-DEVELOPMENT

PRINTED ON TUESDAY 21. JANUARY 2014

FIGURE B14-CTG N-1 (KEEPHILLS #2 XFMR G2)(CONVERGED)

SK Tie (Import): -0.1 MW BC and MATL (Import): 993.9 MW

Gainford Substation 165S Facility Upgrade

P1412

Bus - Voltage (kV/pu)Branch - MW/MvarEquipment - MW/Mvar100.0%Rate A1.200OV 0.900UVkV: <=25.000 <=69.000 <=138.000 <=240.000 <=500.000 >500.000

423KEEPHIL7

1.02141.2

29.3

24.5

29.1

20.6

1.02141.1

947GAINTAP2

14.6

5.9

14.6

5.9

964WHITE TP

1.03141.8

50.5

2.8

50.7

2.7

134WABAMUN7

1.03142.2

50.8

2.7

50.7

2.7

103.7

1.2

103.5

6.2

44FT ASBN7

1.03141.9

844ASBNE TP

1.03141.9

17.1

10.5

17.1

10.5

1.02141.1

41N BARRH7

1.03141.8

934FLAT TAP

1.02141.1

28.4

14.2

28.1

12.7

18.6

4.5

18.5

57.7

14.6

57.9

12.2

1266SARAH L7

1.05145.4

11.0

23.2

10.6

19.6

360STONY P7

1.03141.5

905105S TAP

1.02141.4

2092HS_138

1.03142.5

23.0

13.8

23.1

14.1

14.0

23.6

14.0

22.72.0

437TMPL2GA7

364CARVEL01

1.02141.4

27.1

13.7

27.0

13.3

42.2

9.6

41.7

8.9

5437TMPL2GA10

0.994.1

14.6

5.9 4.7

11.0

3.614.5

3.5

1.1

420KEEPHIL4

421KEEPHIL5

1.05251.8

8651043L-X4

1.04249.9

155BENALTO4

1.05251.6

400.1

83.9

400.1

83.7

111.2

46.9

111.0

76.0

21.3

75.3

12.8

76.3

21.3

75.5

12.8

49.4

111.0

49.4

110.8

52.0

135SUNDANC4

1.06254.7

24.9

2.1

25.0

38.3

24.9

2.1

25.0

38.5

505JASPER 4

1.02244.5

521PETROLIA

1.01243.5

955PDMAKER1

1.02244.4

33.5

42.7

33.5

47.2

168.2 168.1

12.0

315.6

44.3

307.5

21.3

12.1

133WABAMUN4

324.7

33.4

326.9

43.0

137N CALDE4

1.02244.1

141.4

2.3

141.5

2.7221.0

34.6

217.4

22.9

1.04250.0

1.05251.7

512DOME 4

297.8

55.6

290.3

36.6

138N BARRH4

1.06253.8

1.01243.3

488CHERHIL1

1.06254.0

213.6

26.6

211.3

27.1

190.3

31.0

192.0

33.2

3344FT ASBN8

1.0225.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3041N BARRH9

1.0125.2

10.7 10.6

3.4

10.6

3.4

4360STONY P9

1.0325.8 3360

STONY A9

1.0325.8

18.5

4.9

18.4

3.6

18.5 18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

18.4

3.6

4.1

4.9

342SUND#4GN

0.9919.7

350.2351.1

72.227.9

14.0

379.0

86.2R

345SUND#5GN

1.0019.9

342.8

49.3

343.6

101.0

23.4

11.7

367.0

112.7R

350SUND#6GN

0.9919.8

345.5

4.5

346.6

62.4

26.4

13.2

373.0

75.6R

19.3

610KEEPHIL2

1.06528.8

630SUNNYB1

1.06529.7

258ELLERSLI

1.05526.0

510KEEPHIL3

1.06528.8

315.5

80.2

315.6

57.4

385.4

92.8

385.9

7.7

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.5

525GENESEE4

1.06529.7

347.4

19.0

347.4

19.6

347.4

19.0

347.4

19.6

482.7

108.1

483.5

32.8

422KEEP#1GN

1.0019.0

424KEEP#2GN

1.0019.0

35.8

391.2

106.7

415.0

118.6R

23.8

11.9

389.8

403KEEP#3GN

1.0623.2

40.4

20.2

40.4

20.8

40.4

20.2

491GENES 19

1.0120.6

376.5

20.5

375.7

32.0

31.0

15.5407.5

36.0R492GENES 29

1.0120.7

378.5

21.9

377.4

31.9

31.1

15.5409.6

37.4R

1

Page 58: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

Connection Engineering Study Report: Gainford 165S Substation Upgrade

AltaLink

Page 28 June, 2016

Attachment C

Post-Project Voltage Stability Diagrams (Scenarios 3)

Page 59: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

Gainford 165S 138 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 60: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

Wabamun 19S 138 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 61: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

Wabamun 19S 240 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 62: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

North Barrhead 69S 138 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 63: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

North Barrhead 69S 240 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 64: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

Stony Plain 434S 138 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 65: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

Entwistle 235S 138 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5

Page 66: APPENDIX A CONNECTION ASSESSMENT - Alberta …€¦ · Study Scope ... Summary of Transmission Line Ratings in the Study Area ... This connection assessment assumed a 0.9 lagging

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Study Area Incremental Load (MW)

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1B

us

Volt

age (

pu)

Cherhill 338S 240 kV Bus Voltage - 2016-17WP

N-0: Normal Operation

N-1: 452L (Stony Plain 434S to Red Castle 367S)

N-1: Genesee #3 Unit XFMR G3

N-1: N. BARRH 69S 240/138 kV XFMR T4

N-1: 1046L (Sundance 310P to Cherhill 338S)

N-1: Genesee #1 Unit XFMR G1

N-1: Sundance 5A Unit XFMR T5