Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 10, 2019. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2019;10:101028Z01CS2019. www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Spinelli et al. 1
CASE REPORT PEER REVIEWED | OPEN ACCESS
An unusual plexiform neurofibroma confused with a vascular malformation: A case report
Claudio Spinelli, Gianmarco Elia, Alessia Bertocchini, Chiara Calani, Matteo Leoni, Silvia Strambi
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Neurofibromatosis type I, or Von Recklinghausen disease, is a multisystem disorder that primarily involves the skin and nervous system. Plexiform neurofibromas are one of the most pathognomonic and often the most disabling feature of the disease; generally benign, these lesions might degenerate into neurofibrosarcoma. They grow along peripheral nerves, and can be divided, on histological and biological bases, into two different groups: nodular / mass neurofibromas and Plexiform neurofibromas (superficial and deep). Despite the unique appearance of deep plexiform neurofibroma, especially on T2-weghted MRI, cutaneous and subcutaneous forms are more difficult to diagnose. The imaging findings of the superficial forms are different from the imaging characteristics of the deeper lesions and can be confused with a low-flow vascular malformation. Case Report: We report a 2-year-old boy, with diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type I, who came to our attention with a palpable swelling on the left nuchal region exhibiting ultrasonographical characteristics of a venolymphatic malformation. This lesion
Claudio Spinelli1, Gianmarco Elia1, Alessia Bertocchini1, Chiara Calani1, Matteo Leoni1, Silvia Strambi1
Affiliations: 1Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, De-partment of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critic Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.Corresponding Author: Prof. Claudio Spinelli, MD, Full Pro-fessor of Pediatric Surgery, Chief: Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critic Area. University of Pisa, Via Paradisea 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy; Email: [email protected]
Received: 26 February 2019Accepted: 12 April 2019Published: 17 May 2019
was histologically reported to be a superficial plexiform neurofibroma. Conclusion: A superficial plexiform neurofibroma may present imaging features of a vascular malformation. For this reason, the absence of the classical ultrasonographical appearance do not exclude a diagnosis of neurofibroma, expecially in superficial location.
Keywords: Hemangioma, Neurofibromatosis type I, Peripheral nerve neoplasia, Plexiform neurofibroma, Schwann cells
How to cite this article
Spinelli C, Elia G, Bertocchini A, Calani C, Leoni M, Strambi S. An unusual plexiform neurofibroma confused with a vascular malformation: A case report. Int J Case Rep Images 2019;10:101028Z01CS2019.
Article ID: 101028Z01CS2019
*********
doi: 10.5348/101028Z01CS2019CR
INTRODUCTION
Neurofibromas are a common pathognomonic feature of neurofibromatosis type I (NF1). Its mortality and morbidity rates depend on proliferation and location, as well as growth in size and potential for malignant degeneration of the lesion [1–4]. Based on their histological and radiologic appearance, neurofibromas can be divided into two large groups: discrete mass / nodular forms and diffuse / plexiform variety, which is the most common [5–7].
These lesions are histologically defined as interdigitating network of enlarged nerves usually surrounded by a collagenous matrix representing the
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 10, 2019. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2019;10:101028Z01CS2019. www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Spinelli et al. 2
diffuse involvement of a long nerve and its branches. They are composed by the same elements that compose peripheral nerves, including axons, fibroblasts and Schwann cells being the most significant (60%) [8–10]. These elements are located randomly within a myxoid stroma and occasionally they reach a size that is accountable for a disfiguring enlargement of the extremities , called “ elephantiasis neuromatosa ”.
Plexiform neurofibromas present with masses of variable size, often multiple, that might develop anywhere along a nerve course, although main locations are large nerve trunks and regions with high concentration of adipose tissue (e.g. orbit region) [2–3]. By location of their onset they are divided as superficial and deep with some lesions having mixed characteristics. Superficial plexiform neurofibromas can be cutaneous or subcutaneous and are common in NF1. Such lesions have imaging characteristics on ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that often differs to the deep ones and this is the reason why they closely resemble a lymphatic or venous malformation, a hemangioma, or less commonly, a traumatic or inflammatory lesion of the subcutaneous tissues [11–13].
CASE REPORT
A 2-year-old boy, with diagnosis of NF1, came to our attention for a palpable swelling on the left nuchal region. The elements produced by ultrasonography were not significant in order to define the nature of the swelling: sonographic examination showed a in homogeneous hypoechoic lesion of 1.5x1.3 cm in diameter, without posterior acoustic enhancement or shadowing and without peripheral nerve continuity but with numerous low-flow vessels at Doppler, compatible with a venolymphatic malformation. Due to the location and the ultrasound characteristics, the diagnosis of neurofibroma was (mistakenly) ruled out and a day-hospital exeresis procedure was planned. The excision showed a fibrous, white lesion, firmly attached to the skull. Because of the presence of numerous branches (Figure 1), the excision needed to be broadened in order for the lesion to be completely removed. This macroscopic feature, enhanced by the previous NF - I diagnosis, triggered the suspicion for neurofibroma: the post-operative histological examination proved to be a superficial (subcutaneous) plexiform neurofibroma. No local recurrence occurred after a 24 months follow-up.
DISCUSSION
Type I neurofibromatosis (NF1) or Von Recklinghausen disease is one of the most frequent genetic disorders [14–15]. It occurs with an incidence of 1/3000–4000 live births: nearly half of the patients suffer from the “sporadic” form, or report a non-verifiable
family history. NF1 is an autosomal dominant disorder with high penetrance (almost 100%) within the fifth year of age; it has a wide clinical variability of expression and symptoms, even among members of the same family. There are four major clinical markers: “café au lait” spots, usually present at birth or within the twelfth year of age, axillary and/or inguinal freckling, which usually shows around 6-7 years of age and can increase until puberty; pigmented (yellow – brown) hamartomas of the iris, called Lisch nodules, that appear in puberty, in 85–90% of cases; cutaneous or nodular (subcutaneous) neurofibromas [9]. Minor clinical signs are sometimes associated with these, and can facilitate the diagnosis: macrocephaly (40–50%), short stature (30%), cyclopia (15%). The disease is generally asymptomatic, and occasional complaints affect a minority of subjects (around 20%) at a very young age or in specific age groups. Most recurrent disorders are: learning disabilities (40–60%), plexiform neurofibroma (25–30%), orthopaedic complaints, optic glioma (20%) around 4-6 years of age, Central nervous system (CNS) tumours (gliomas, ependymomas), convulsions (3-4%), cephalea, stenosis, hypotension (6%), renal artery stenosis, pheochromocytoma) [16–17]. Even if Plexiform neurofibromas can occur throughout the body, the more common sites are thorax and abdomen (55%), arms (20%), lower limb (10%) and face (10%); the nuchal location, as shown in our case, is quite atypical [1].
Whereas NF1 can be diagnosed on the bases of specific clinical symptoms, superficial plexiforms neurofibromas are sometimes more difficult to detect due to the different imaging characteristics than deep ones. The role of T2-weighted MRI in deep neurofibromas is in determining
Figure 1: Intraoperative image of the plexiform neurofibroma in the left nuchal region. The large ramification differentiates it from a vascular malformation.
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 10, 2019. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2019;10:101028Z01CS2019. www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Spinelli et al. 3
the nature (nervous) of the lesions and the extent of neurofibromas, visualizing the lesions through a signal with low to intermediate intensity, which tends to increase peripherally [2]. This target sign can be easily explained by the histological composition of neurofibromas; the low signal centre on T2-weighted images corresponds to dense fibrous and collagenous central zone and the high peripheral signal on MRI is related to the abundant myxoid material with high fluid content in the outer zones of the lesion [18–19].
The echographical aspect of a deep neurofibroma seems to depend on its size [11]. Smaller tumours tend to appear as homogeneous and hypoecogenic lesion that can show a posterior acoustic enhancement or shadowing mimicking a cystic lesion. Neurofibromas with a larger diameter tend to present with the same appearance of deep plexiform neurofibroma in MRI (increased signal intensity peripherally and decreased signal intensity centrally): peripheral hypoecogenic band and a more ecogenic core [20]. In both cases nerve continuity can be present. Lim et al. [11], in a multi - institutional study, have described different MRI characteristics for deep and superficial plexiform neurofibromas with 75% of deep ones demonstrating a target sign compared to 21% of superficial lesions. They further described the imaging features of superficial neurofibromas as unilateral or asymmetric diffuse lesion without any nodular or fascicular morphology corresponding to the ultrasonographical image of a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion. The difference between deep and superficial neurofibromas can be related to the histology of infiltrating spindle cells (fibroblasts and smooth muscular cells) around normal superficial structures such as blood vessels, adipose tissue and skin adnexa [21–22]. In the present patient, the numerous low-flow vessels associated with diffuse thickening of subcutaneous tissue were believed to represent a venulolymphatic malformation. In fact the prominent ectasic low-flow vessels in the lesion represented the rich vascularity that can be present in superficial neurofibromas.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, a superficial plexiform neurofibroma can present ultrasonographical findings more similar to a vascular (venous or lymphatic) malformation than to a pheripheral nerve sheath tumor. It is important to know that the absence of the classical ultrasonographical appearance do not exclude a neurofibroma, expecially in a superficial and atypical location.
REFERENCES
1. Reynolds RM, Browing GG, Nawroz I, Campbell IW. Von Recklinghausen’s neurofibromatosis: Neurofibromatosis type 1. Lancet 2003;361(9368):1552–4.
2. Hersh JH; American Academy of Pediatrics Comittee on Genetics. Health supervision for children with neurofibromatosis. Pediatrics 2008;121(3):633–42.
3. Yoshida Y, Ehara Y, Koga M, Imafuku S, Yamamoto O. Epidemiological analysis of major complications requiring medical intervention in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018;98(8):753–6.
4. Tonsgard JH. Clinical manifestations and management of neurofibromatosis type 1. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2006;13(1):2–7.
5. Laycock-van Spyk S, Thomas N, Cooper DN, Upadhyaya M. Neurofibromatosis type 1-associated tumours: Their somatic mutational spectrum and pathogenesis. Hum Genomics 2011;5(6):623–90.
6. Philpott C, Tovell H, Frayling IM, Cooper DN, Upadhyaya M. The NF1 somatic mutational landscape in sporadic human cancers. Hum Genomics 2017;11(1):13.
7. Rodriguez FJ, Stratakis CA, Evans DG. Genetic predisposition to peripheral nerve neoplasia: Diagnostic criteria and pathogenesis of neurofibromatoses, Carney complex, and related syndromes. Acta Neuropatol 2012;123(3):349–67.
8. Woodruff JM. Phatology of tumors of the peripheral nerve sheath in type 1 neurofibromatosis. Am J Med Genet 1999;89(1):23–30.
9. Nguyen R, Kluwe L, Fuensterer C, Kentsch M, Friedrich RE, Mautner VF. Plexiform neurofibromas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: Frequency and associated clinical deficits. J Pediatr 2011;159(4):652–5.e2.
10. Jett K, Nguyen R, Arman D, et al. Quantitative associations of scalp and body subcutaneous neurofibromas with internal plexiform tumors in neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Med Genet A 2015;167(7):1518–24.
11. Lim R, Jaramillo D, Poussaint TY, Chang Y, Korf B. Superficial neurofibroma: A lesion with unique MRI characteristics in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(3):962–8.
12. Ghuman M, Hwang S, Antonescu CR, Panicek DM. Plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor: Imaging features and clinical findings. Skeletal Radiol 2019 Mar;48(3):437–43.
13. Yerdelen D, Koc F, Dordu M, Karakas M. Electrophysiological findings in neurofibromatosis type 1. J Neurol Sci 2011;306(1–2):42–8.
14. Jouhilahti EM, Peltonen S, Heape AM, Peltonen J. The pathoetiology of neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Pathol 2011;178(5):1932–9.
15. Leppävirta J, Kallionpää RA, Uusitalo E, et al. Congenital anomalies in neurofibromatosis 1: A retrospective register-based total population study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018;13(1):5.
16. Rosenfeld A, Listernick R, Charrow J, Goldman S. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and high-grade tumors of the central nervous system. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26(5):663–7.
17. VaranA,ŞenH,AydinB,YalçinB,KutlukT,AkyüzC. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and malignancy in childhood. Clin Genet 2016;89(3):341–5.
18. Lin J, Jacobson JA, Hayes CW. Sonographic target sign in neurofibromas. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18(7):513–7.
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 10, 2019. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2019;10:101028Z01CS2019. www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Spinelli et al. 4
19. Ryu JA, Lee SH, Cha EY, Kim TY, Kim SM, Shin MJ. Sonographic differentiation between schwannomas and neurofibromas in the musculoskeletal system. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34(12):2253–60.
20. Gosein M, Ameeral A, Banfield R, Mosodeen M. Plexiform neurofibroma of the wrist: Imaging features and when to suspect malignancy. Case Rep Radiol 2013;2013:493752.
21. Reynolds DL Jr, Jacobson JA, Inampudi P, Jamdar DA, Ebrahim FS, Hayes CW. Sonographic characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(3):741–4.
22. O’Keefe P, Reid J, Morrison S, Vidimos A, DiFiore J. Unexpected diagnosis of superficial neurofibroma in a lesion with imaging features of a vascular malformation. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35(12):1250–3.
*********
Author ContributionsClaudio Spinelli – Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolvedGianmarco Elia – Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolvedAlessia Bertocchini – Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolvedChiara Calani – Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the
version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolvedMatteo Leoni – Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolvedStrambi Silvia – Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved
Guarantor of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone.
Consent StatementAfter the Institutional Review Board approval, written informed consent was obtained from the parents for publication of this case report and accompanying images.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Copyright© 2019 Claudio Spinelli et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.
International Journal of Case Reports and Images, Vol. 10, 2019. ISSN: 0976-3198
Int J Case Rep Images 2019;10:101028Z01CS2019. www.ijcasereportsandimages.com
Spinelli et al. 5
Access full text article onother devices
Access PDF of article onother devices
