30
AD-A241 674 L AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO. Assessment of the Tribological Requirements of Advanced Spacecraft Mechanisms Prepared by SC P. D. FLEISCHAUER and M. R. HILTON Mechanics and Materials Technology Center 3 ELECTE lchnology Operations OCT 151991 30 September 1991 Prepared for WRIGHT LABORATORIES Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-6533 SPACESYSTEMS'DIVISION AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND Los Angeles Air Force Base P. O. Box 92960 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2960 Contract No. F04701-88-C-0089 Engineering and Technology Group THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION (Tj 91-13163 El Segundo, California . , APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

AD-A241 674L AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO.

Assessment of the Tribological Requirementsof Advanced Spacecraft Mechanisms

Prepared by

SC P. D. FLEISCHAUER and M. R. HILTONMechanics and Materials Technology Center

3 ELECTE lchnology Operations

OCT 15199130 September 1991

Prepared for

WRIGHT LABORATORIESWright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-6533

SPACESYSTEMS'DIVISIONAIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND

Los Angeles Air Force BaseP. O. Box 92960

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2960

Contract No. F04701-88-C-0089

Engineering and Technology Group

THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION (Tj91-13163 El Segundo, California . ,

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE;DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

Page 2: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

Aerospace Report No.TOR-0090(5064)-1

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRIBOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS OFADVANCED SPACECRAFT MECHANISMS

Prepared by

P. D. Fleischauer and M. R. HiltonMechanics and Material Tchnology Center

echnology Opertions

30 September 1991

Engineering and Technology Group 4 E

THE AEROSPACE'CORPORATIONEl Segundo, CA 90245

Prepared for

WRIGHT LABORATORIES Accesio For-Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-6533 NTIS CRA&I

SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION nTIC TABnp 0AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND !Uannofne

Los Angeles Air Force Base .............................P. O. Box 92960

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2960 By...Distributiion .. ........ ......... '

Availability Codes

Contract No. F04701-88-C-0089 .is Avail adiorSpecial

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE;DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

Page 3: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

Report NoTOR-0090(5064)-1

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRTBOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTSOF ADVANCED SPACECRAFT MECHANISMS

Prepared

P D. Fleischauer M. R. Hilton

Approved

H. K, A. Kan, Director R. W Fillers, Principal DirectorSurface Science Department Mechanics and Materials Technology Center

K. R. Mecklenburg (WIJMLBT

* The information in a Technical Operating Report was developed for a particular program

and is not necessarily of broader technical applicability.

iii

Page 4: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

ABSTRACT

A survey was conducted of existing technologies for moving mechanical

assemblies used in spacecraft applications. The purpose was to identify

areas where future requirements for lifetimes in excess of ten years with

anticipated speeds, loads, and temperatures might not be satisfied. Some

specific mechanisms, such as momentum/reaction wheels, high-speed turbines,

pointing and tracking mechanisms, despin mechanisms, and gimbal mechanisms,

were identified as areas for potential application of existing but unused

technologies. Two major problem areas identified involve boundary-regime

lubrication and lubricant supply (active or passive) for long life. Areas

where substantial, near-term improvements appear practical include the use

of hybrid bearings, new synthetic fluid lubricants, new bearing retainer

materials, and properly designed solid-film lubricants.

0 QV

Page 5: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Air Force Systems Command, Space

Systems Division, and the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, under

contract number F04701-88-C-0089. The authors thank B. D. McConnell and

L. L. Fahrenbacher for helpful discussions.

vi

Page 6: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ACKNOWLEDGMENT ..................................................... vi

I. INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1

II. SPECIFIC PROBLEMS ............................................. 3

III. DEMANDING TRIBOLOGICAL CONDITIONS............................. 13

IV. POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS/NEW TECHNOLOGIES ..................... 17

V. CONCLUSIONS................................................... 23

REFERENCES....................................... ........ 25

vii

Page 7: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

FIGURES

1. Schematic of a Bearing Configuration Showing aLabyrinth Seal ...... ......................................... 4

2. Schematic of a Despin Mechanical Assembly andSlip-Ring Assembly Laboratory Life-Test Fixture ............... 5

3. Photograph, Detailed Drawing, and Schematic ofControl-Moment Gyroscope and Spin Bearing Assembly ............. 7

4. Life-Test Results for Various Lubricants Investigatedwith a Boundary Lubricant Screening Test andOscillatory Scanner-Bearing Test .............................. 18

5. Absorption of Oil by Phenolic Retainers as a Functionof Time for Three Samples of Phenolic Material ................ 21

TABLE (

1. Tribology Problems and Their Impacts .......................... 9

viii

Page 8: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

I. INTRODUCTION

This assessment is concerned with problems in tribology (friction,

wear, an&lubrication) that can limit the useful lifetimes of critical

precision mechanisms and therefore those of spacecraft systems. The

prevailing attitude of most spacecraft contractors is that there .

virtually no problems in tribology. After mechanical systems are designed

to meet operational plans, the designer requests the lubrication "expert"

to provide a lubricant to satisfy friction, wear, or lifetime requirements.

Such an approach sufficed as long as performance demands were minimal, but

it often led to elaborate engineering solutions or work-arounds to compen-

sate for low-grade technology. The demands of future mechanical systems

with regard to accuracy, mobility, and lifetime require that tribological

demands be met in the early design phase. It will no longer be possible to

assume that the appropriate oil or grease will take care of the problem.

The field of tribology encompasses all aspects of mechanical interac-

tion in moving mechanical assemblies (MMAs). Heretofore, spacecraft

systems have performed adequately (i.e., have reached lifetime require-

ments) with no lubricant-related or other tribology problems. However,

this success was achieved because other systems (e.g., batteries,

electronics, thermal and optical systems) failed before the MMAs did. At

present, these other systems are becoming increasingly reliable as new

technologies are incorporated. However, if the designers of complex

systems fail to take into account corresponding advances in tribology, an

entire system could fail as a result of limitations in tribological

performance.

The objective of this assessment is, therefore, to identify mechanical

components and subsystems that probably cannot meet the requirements of

advanced spacecraft systems merely through the implementation of present

technologies and, where possible, to recommend not only the latest

technologies, but also proven -- though unused -- technologies, to meet

those requirements. In some instances technologies already exist that can

1

Page 9: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

be used to satisfy future requirements, but they have not been thoroughly

tested or demonstrated in specific applications. In others additional

research and development is required to meet the challenges.

The approach taken to assess future requirements and current capabili-

ties was to survey satellite program offices, contractors, and other

experts in the field, as well as to search the literature for published

information. In addition, a review was conducted of support activities for

the United States Air Force Space Systems Division (AFSSD) and the National

Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) dealing with past problems in

tribology. After a preliminary consideration of the information obtained,

specific problem areas and potential solutions were identified.

The remainder of this report is organized in three sections. The first

is a discussion of specific problems encountered over fifteen years of work

with AFSSD and NASA. The second describes critical componenits and

particularly difficult or demanding tribological conditions. The tnird

concerns specific systems and recommendations for solutions to anticipated

problems.

2

Page 10: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

II. SPECIFIC PROBLEMS

Early work in the tribology of space systems concerned MMAs on spin-

stabilized satellites. Typical designs maintained a stationary platform,

e.g., for the antennas of a communication satellite, and a rotating portion

that contained the electronics, batteries, and other systems. Typical

examhples include the Defense Satellite Communication System (DSCS II), NATO

III, and a variety of commercial satellites. The most challenging problems

for "spinner" satellites involved the low-torque (low-ripple) operation of

despin mechanical assemblies (DMAs) and the maintenance of low torque and

low electrical noise in the associated electrical interface between the

rotating elements (primarily slip-ring assemblies); such mechanisms are

also known as bearing and power transfer assemblies (BAPTAs). Initial

anxieties arose from a fear that lubricants could be lost from the bearings

by means of surface migration or evaporation [1]. Early designs included

the complex labyrinth sealing of the rotating shafts to provide tortuous

paths to contain oil molecules [2] (Fig. 1). Although the tribological

requirements of DMA bearings are quite modest and are ideally suited for

dry film lubrication, very little effort was devoted to the use of solid

film lubricants in U.S. space systems, primarily because of early successes

with fluids. In contrast, lead-film lubrication with sintered lead-bronze

bearing retainers has been tested and used in European systems [3].

A number of laboratory life tests have been performed to analyze the

performance of lubricants and hardware in DMAs, and numerous satellites

have been in orbit for many years. One such .ife test was conducted in The

Aerospace Corporation's laboratories [4] (Fig. 2), and others involving

very similar test stands were conducted at contractors' facilities [5]. In

typical systems bearings were of the order of 90 to 150-mm bore, had a

precision of ABEC 7 or better, operated at speeds of 30 to 60 rpm, and were

lubricated with an oil comparable to Vackote 36233 [6,7]. The contact

stresses on the bearings were low, so that even though they operated in the

mixed (elastohydrodynamic boundary) lubrication regime, the antiwear

3

Page 11: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

LABRITH EA

LUBRICANTRESERVOIR LURIAN

RESERVOIR

~~~BAALLETAINER~

Fig. 1. Schematic of a Bearing Configuration Showing a Labyrinth Seal(from Ref. 2).

4I

Page 12: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

C/l,

3: -/'C

2--J

LUU

U-H-

L(U

V)L.C/) C) 4)

cc:

CC 0 0a: 0 C/D cc

H- ~j0b~ 0 ~ -42

a: < U)LL

C-)~

5

Page 13: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

additives in the oil prevented any significant bearing wear over six to ten Iyears of operation. For flight systems lubricant loss rates due to

evaporation were calculated, and enough oil was put into the bearings to

provide a 50 to 100% margin of error.

For the most part, orbiting satellites and laboratory life-test

fixtures performed very well. The Aerospace Corporation life test ran for

more than seven years with no failures, while contractors' tests ran from

seven to ten years with little or no bearing wear and no torque or torque

noise problems. For spin-stabilized satellites, power system failures

often limited life long before any tribological failures occurred.

Programs that require higher performance levels, such as improved

pointing accuracies, rapid retargeting, and longer lifetimes, have

generally chosen three-axis stabilization for their satellites, in which

momentum or reaction wheels or control-moment gyros (CMGs) are used to

achieve stability and to point and change pointing rapidly (slew)

(Fig. 3). The tribology problems with three-axis systems are not only

different from those in simpler systems but are also usually more

complex. Medium- and high-speed (3000 to 12000 rpm) spin bearings and

gimbal bearings, which operate in an oscillatory (dithering) mode and

rarely make a full revolution, are of major concern for use in wheels.

Also, solar-array drive mechanisms (SADMs) for maintaining the pointing of

solar panels and numerous deployment mechanisms and actuators require

careful design and fabrication control.

The reaction/momentum wheels for conventional communications,

surveillance, and weather satellites operate under relatively benign

conditions, with moderate bearing loads and torque requirements.

Consequently, lifetimes of ten years have been achieved in tests and in

some flight systems [8]. However, even for conventional systems, gimbals

and electrical contacts have consistently been sources of anomalies and

even failures. A recent survey of military tribology presents a good

description of future requirements for many space systems; needs in the

areas of pointing and control systems, cryocoolers, space propulsion, and

longer-term space applications are described (9].

6

Page 14: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

=

0 000cc=w 4U

cc0

0 4

00>

ZCU

4)U)

ei CU

bo00 V

4.)C/0

bOO

Page 15: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

Tribology problems experienced in a variety of AFSD programs are

summarized in Table I. Some problems result from inappropriate design and

the failure to involve the tribologist in the design and testing phases of

the programs. Examples include the potentiometer for ATP (acquisition,

tracking, and pointing) control, the gear mechanism, and the telescope

gimbal bearings. Such shortcomings can usually be avoided by careful

planning and detailed procedures. Other problems are of a fundamental

nature: the torque anomalies for spin bearings in heavily loaded momentum

wheels, lubricant degradation and subsequent wear under condition of

boundary lubrication, and torque and electrical noise anomalies for slip-

ring assemblies. The problems encountered typically result from an

ineffective supply of lubricant to the contacting surfaces, followed by

other mechanical aberrations, including bearing-retainer instabilities,

excessive friction, and wear. The causes of poor lubricant supply include

inadequate initial amounts, loss via transport processes, normal consump-

tion with little or no resupply, and chemical degradation of otherwise

sufficient lubricant as a result of mishandling during storage and ground

testing or the improper selection of lubricant for a given application.

Page 16: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

0 HU ., .0--0r. 00 e4) :s

0 I V4- 4. -Hc4( 0 d)Z 4) 4V 0) "I

.,q- $0) CL 0) 4. 40)4 0 4 .-ri 4 E) -4.)-.) S.V43 oS ~ t(U V0) c v-i 04. 4 0v 44 0)V a 0 r. -d -4 0

a0 . a.1f0 at 0 4 ) (U4 '- U- 0al) U .0 a> 4) 44 V(Ur

v 4. 4-v) S- 0 r. -rL r.) n rq to4or. m r. *'-4 U)~ -4 .1. 0H- .q4.) 4)4( .,1 C))C 0*.- r- -v- 0 0 30 2. 0 r- 3 0 - Q.)) -'4 ) 0 --aU (D- a'- 0 24 (U )0 U. *. D U) 41

J3 0.V .. 4) H S.. 09-.- V) 4- ) H) 0 1 0 . 0:H- ~ 4- 0 -40 :34H 00 0*o -v4 2go

0DM L k -4. r.H .- 0 J r. r. 2)m0.0) 3-, , ( 0) -4 4))- 0) £. to &00)

.0 0, Wv-I (dU) =- 0, 00 H 4. 0 r.0 *0 a.04-4 H 0 ~ 0 4v-l ) - I (U - 4 A4 r.

0U))

0C V)1 H

E-4 M) V1 1 4 0 0) 030 (. U 4) 4.. .0 -I 0 0bO b

( 0 0 -I (U .,*'4= ,

aj 0 )H 0 aU l - 0.r . C4 C 04.42 > >4. .1) ) 0) 0) 4) 4 V

m) (U) W .1U) Uq L. . .r .thU -v-aiS.,* L. . uH 9). V)- U. 3 ) Hr. c (aU

V 03 V) 0 9-0 4.) .- r4j *v-4 0.(U 0.. 0 'v-I 0~~ 0.-4 00- ~ 4 L 4 0 0.

.0 0 (vi 0D x( ) (D 00) a) 0 0 02E-4 D4 ) 4.) Ca'o vz)M U~0..

b- bo00 U)0

44.) bo HvI--0 * 4 r- 4.)

.0 0. - 43 0l. v4 r. (

0.6 0U C U WL r. 0 .0 4E4 U) ) 4) 0 5.. .)(0 V)~ H

c 0) 4.) J 0-1 0 00 0 0)0 V) 4.) 4.) - .0 = . 4.) 0 z* .v-4 (d E '-4 D 0" >) V)0 w

4.) )00 -I *2 u 4 0J. L. bo r. LL. 5.0 (U -4 r 4 0 0( 14 0 0

V o bL. .~ U)co(a 0v-410 .0 c ) H4 H. 4.)C4 F. r -4 V)44 4)0 4).) 130 -- 0 -H .0 4 .U '0 0 . ) d)0a 6V) 0) 4) 3 4:0 m r. 0 a) 0(

E0. bo a V(o 'o O- 0 .0 bo bo ) -4 ) *4bD - 0(U 0)( -. 0 i 40) 0, -) "U)

0(MU0 0)0 00) L .0 (/2 0 r- a~L ) bo%.0a) 0 LU) 0.=0 0 bD a 0 -1 .,4(M Q -1 S. .qMf.0- C040 J .4.) L- H .-34-1 OH U) C

bO 0

L.- E-.

L 0. (U

U.0 -4 .

01 0) L0 .0LV) -1 0 c.- ) 0)0.i

U) .) C . L c 4.) 00r.. 0. V U) S. -Z

V) a .) CL43 Q 4.)Cd Cf. r rj 4.)4 E)

00 0 ) (0 0 -40 0 0 x 0 L.~Cll (/ /2Z 40 0 C.) E

Page 17: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

o 00

U)i -CH 4

Uu 0) '-I a)) rf(1 a aS. rj- (Ti (1)-4i 40 )

a -. al a) -0) 4D.)4.)) 4.) 1

CL 0 V ) rl ul to*. CCi :C- . , ) -H. VaQ) c

4) (D 1O r- C.. L. .ja 04 .C) CC) 3) U) C)) vL 1) 4)

0. U) .) 2k 13 00)) -i .I3: 2) C)C .,4 a to~ b CU

C.. (a 0 '-4j 0fl0' (4-4 40) a. 0 H C) V

4.) 4)3 cc b d V l 0 ., 4.)) U~I *

4. - c 4) U) U-) (D .) U) U

vz E ~ U) 0z. 0 0 0lz-. E )) u

4o 0)ci a t );. 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ * CH Cd9 1 o Q)r ) - ) .q 0m 40 .0O 4. ) C) ~ (> 0 . 5 c

4.)r- CC I CLO C0c a) ~ (a:.)r H0.-1 V r. U344 ) P. Ui) r.C)> o T ) HC £CD b 4 ) 0L. 4.) V )-. Q)CHC)-C4))- Q)~ :3 1) E )4) 4. >U

4.) rN (a .0W .. 0U bD a)a)--i *.l0 "4C 0 m.0. U) ca .q ) -1 co. 4-) ) 5 -1~ -i 4-

4) U) ~ *H 0C a . (ViD C) U) Vo a0- *H 0) -4C L. 42 0)). C) 0i

w0 0(- -j C-C) . 1. .) -4 -J - 00 4.) *

Q-. C)C r-. m.I 4- C C U) Cl00 0 CC) c- aj3~C 0.0$..) to0 VH)

U) U)C U-) ) ' C 4U) ~ - r 0)0

0 3U) O OC 0.ca.- O O r_ 0) C)2~ UO 11- toH S--- 0).)H ) .b 4 -C - -'

E- 1I1.0 H) -H 4to -U 0 0j C) C C

0C a 0 r-_ 0 (1 aCa -4 1- Ca a)- U) (a () a 0bD 0 0) CC 1 C C 0.0C) -' U) U

U) U) i C.. 4.) C3 0- -)H )) 0 VC0 C C O 0 ) CC L. C) ) 4.)C CC'H(10 0 ) bC a)- C)U r- C CCC) Q) 0$.. s l )

-H 0 c U) caIC L.bC 'H j 'H C-1D 0 :s4) ti a CV bDC 2 2 O 0)O j0)

'HL Q- Ca 0- .- C0V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t C0U) 0- -C - *-0 * -) C

C~~~r 4.) U)U HC . C* ~U 01 0C V.C 0) C) C C 004. U)- >C0 10 C )0C ) C0 04.)- 0 .1 . 4 0 . 0 00 i0)t ( -a )4 CC U) zUC ) U)C i )Ub) -H C-C a, U) w). -'4 )b'J r- C 0 ) 0C C 1 0 1 .) aO'J I)

CC 0C Q'r U) E 0 -HC r-C UH. 0E -'V) CL 0~~4- rb C 0 b b 4.~- . 4-4

rC-r 4.) 0rCL H1 C) 0C)S .a )a 0Q

C) 4."-) U) 0- 0 C) V- P> Q 0 C4) ) -HV E"& .0 C) -H V) 0

U) -C C )2 - ~ U)C- . 2 1.

Page 18: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

4.) S ).1-114i 4.)

CH04.) 4)0

0 r 0)b% L. ca)U4-) a)~ 0 -)

40. 41 0 ) 4.)0 Q)~C >k L F_4. V

CT o Cd 0 -i0 . ula 0. (0. 4j C)-0

:s4s.) .

0 (Z m 0 r

00

(1) O C_ L

EH 0 ~ M :m- 0 O . . 4.)

H. 9fH .)

E0 1-10 00 OHUa) -4 * - 40 ,1 Q) to.)

.0. -1. 4.) > ) C c

4 m 0 ) . i.q~0 4.sC C41 I.1

Wd H.-1U.4) "Csdl)- 4)C0.) C a) a m

0.)U

bo Q)

0 Cd.0 0 4.)

0_ 0 40

Cd) I . - z0 Q) E .

C. 4 .) - - -

Q) 0 0 C)a W

0a L. 0 3 ) tkO X

E l Q 14.) 4.H 4

0

43.)

0 0

0) t U)4.) bC/)

0) mCd )

0 00m.0 w

Page 19: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

III. DEMANDING TRIBOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

The problems described in Table I can be divided into the following

three categories of potentially severe tribological performance:

(1) Heavily (but variably) loaded angular-contact ball bearings,fluid lubricated, and operating under elastohydrodynamiclubrication conditions with sufficient oil supply over ten-yearlifetimes.

(2) Rolling-element bearings and gears operating under conditions ofload and speed typical of boundary lubrication in space vacuum,with the ratio of lubricant film thickness to contacting surfaceroughness < 1.

(3) Sliding electrical contacts in both very sensitive signalcircuits and relatively high-power circuits.

Each of these scenarios presents major challenges to the tribologist and

the designer.

The conditions of case (1) are typical of the spin bearings in CMGs(Fig. 3). These bearings can experience radial load cycles of >1,000 lb

during the rapid slewing of a large sensor or the retargeting of a weapons

system; in proposed surveillance missions such maneuvers would be repeated

frequently over a desired ten-year lifetime. The conventional, high-

precision steel bearings used in prototype CMGs have been lubricated with

either mineral oil greases or super-refined mineral oils and have employed

phenolic-based ball retainers. These technologies have been used for 30 to

40 years with very little refinement. Although acceptable performance

levels have been achieved for present missions, demonstrated lifetimes fall

far short of the ten-year goal.

Analyses of lubricants from laboratory tests [10] show the depletion

of oil from grease samples taken from CMG spin-bearing cage surfaces and no

depletion from samples of bulk grease. Analyses of metal parts show little

evidence of wear, although some metal is found in degraded lubricant.

Analytical simulations and measurements of bearing motions suggest cage

instability may be involved in retainer wear and ultimately in increases in

113

Page 20: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

bearing torque [11]. However, the sequence of events and conditions that

lead to cage instability and failure are not yet understood. There is

evidence that a constant supply of lubricant might eliminate instability

and, therefore, failure [12].

Boundary lubrication conditions plague spacecraft mechanism designers

and builders to the point of severe emotional distress! The problem of the

loss of lubricant from the contact zone is compounded by operational

requirements forbidding potential sources of contamination. Fluorocarbon

oils and greases were once believed to offer a solution to this lubrication

problem because of their extremely low vapor pressures and reasonably good

lubricating properties for nonboundary conditions. However, testing has

shown that'perfluorinated lubricants do not provide for the numbers of

contact cycles (bearing revolutions) required for most long-term applica-

tions, primarily because of their inability to dissolve the antiwear

additives traditionally used in the base oils to minimize friction during

conditions of boundary contact [13].

An even harsher set of tribological requirements is encountered for

gimbal mechanisms in which, typically, ball bearings are forced to oscil-

late over very small arcs, or dither, and then turn to a new position and

continue to dither. The gimbal system combines the severity of boundary

conditions with the fretting motion of contacting surfaces. Gimbals are

critical elements of most pointing mechanisms -- antennas, sensors (e.g.,

telescopes), and weapons platforms -- and of CMGs. Usually, performance

levels are met when systems are first tested; but with time, lubricant

degradation, bearing wear, or both degrade performance levels so that

mission requirements no longer can be satisfied. Some of the proposed

requirements of new systems (e.g., 1-prad pointing accuracy with <0.25-

prad jitter) offer particular challenges, even for initial operation.

Slip-ring assemblies for the type of despin mechanical assembly

depicted in Fig. 2 were constructed of gold- or silver-plated rings and

wire wipers lubricated with the same fluid lubricants used in the bearings

of the DMAs [14]. Such configurations provided good, reliable performance

614l

Page 21: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

but are precluded on many advanced missions because of the potential for

contamination by fluid lubricants. Dry-film-lubricated systems typically

consist of Ag/MoS2 /carbon brushes on silver or coin-silver rings in the

United States and Ag/MoS 2/Cu brushes on silver or coin-silver rings in

Europe [14,15]. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2 )-lubricated systems can provide

outstanding electromechanical performance for both signal and power

circuits. However, extreme care is required to prevent excessive oxidation

of the MoS2 lubricant and the simultaneous tarnish formation that results

in unacceptable electrical noise and even measurable torque increases.

Many such problems with electrical noise can be traced to the fabrication

and assembly practices used during the construction of the slip-ring

mechanisms; but even after the mechanism is incorporated into a satellite,

it is still necessary to protect the brushes from atmospheric exposure.

Dry-film-lubricated slip rings must be tested, at least in part, under

the actual conditions of use (i.e., at operating rotational speeds) when

electrical noise is of concern. Many tests of dry-lubricated bearings can

be accelerated by increasing the speed of rotation, but for electrical

contacts faster rotation can generate heat that can correct resistance

anomalies. Conversely, if noise is observed in test, it is sometimes

possible to eliminate it by increasing rotational speed for a brief period.

Unfortunately, it is sometimes observed that such noise returns after some

period of normal operation, making circuit reliability very poor.

The operation of gas bearings for gyroscopes and for turbomachinery

(hydrostatic or hydrodynamic) is usually believed not to be a tribology

problem. However, recent situations involving the ground testing of such

systems have demonstrated that erratic friction forces between otherwise

noncontacting surfaces can result in the inability to start mechanism

rotation. In general, proper lubricant choice, coating procedure, and

testing can provide systems that do satisfy performance requirements, but

situations that would require bearing redesign can be envisioned.

15

Page 22: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

K , -IV. POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS/NEW TECHNOLOGIES

This section describes some existing materials technologies whose

implementation into systems already described will probably provide for

dramatic increases in performance, especially in operational lifetime. For

the most part, these technologies have been demonstrated in specific space

applications. However, they have not been examined for use in solving the

Oproblems described in the previous section. In the order of their ease of

incorporation and demonstration, the following technologies are

recommended:

(1) The use of synthetic hydrocarbon and solid lubricants.

(2) The coating of bearing and gear parts with hard, wear-resistantfilms.

(3) The fabrication of retainers for ball bearings from new polymersother than phenolic-based materials.

Polyalphaolefin (PAO) and polyolester (PE) oils can be synthesized and

blended to produce viscosity, vapor pressure, pour point, and other proper-

ties in a controlled way that will suit various needs. Vapor pressures

that are as low as those of linear perfluoropolyalkylethers (PFPEs) have

not been obtained, but they can be lower than those of conventional mineral

oils, and the PAOs and PEs can be blended with additive packages to provide

the same type of protection against wear, oxidation, and corrosion as is

achieved by natural hydrocarbons [16]. Laboratory screening tests have

shown that PAOs and PEs give the longest wear lifetimes in a simulated

boundary-lubrication test facility [13], and bearing tests with a fixture

designed to simulate the oscillatory motion of a weather scanner have shown

that a PAO significantly outlasts both a silicone oil and a PFPE (see Fig. 4).

There is every reason to expect that these synthetic oils can be used for

the high-speed spin bearings of CMGs to provide added protection against

retainer instability and wear.

Dry-film lubricants consisting of vapor-deposited thin films of lead

or MoS2 have been developed for contamination-free, very-low-friction

17

Page 23: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

BOUNDARY LUBRICANT OSCILLATORY SCANNERSCREENING TEST BEARINGS

FAILURE SILICONE AFTER 1800 hrs

56% INCREASE

TOTAL REVS

10x10' AFTER 2300 hrs_ 8 PFP J, -'

e 4

PAO AFTER 3000 hrs

Fig. 4. Life-Test Results for Various Lubricants Investigated with a

Doundary Lubricant Screening Test (left) and Oscillatory

Scanner-Bearing Test (right). Silicone and PFPE failed after

the indicated times, while the PAO test is still running.

18

Page 24: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

applications [3,171. The best lead films are applied by means of ion

plating and are used in ball bearings to maximum effectiveness in

conjunction with sintered lead/bronze retainers that act as a source for

the resupply of spent film material. (See also the companion assessment of

European trends in space tribology [18].) Ultralow-friction, durable films

of MoS2 are deposited by various ion-sputter deposition processes. Though

used in some applications of sliding, very-low-load bearings, as well as

for latching and release mechanisms, these films are still in the

development phase for most ball-bearing applications [19]. There is very

encouraging evidence that ion-assisted, sputter-deposited MoS2 films can

provide ultralow-friction operation even in atmospheric applications (20].

Titanium carbide (TiC)-coated bearing balls have been used in

gyroscope bearings with uncoated steel raceways and superrefined mineral

oil to produce operational lifetimes a factor of ten or more longer than

those for uncoated balls [21]. The commercial process for coating bearing

parts with TiC [22] is available in the United States, but to the authors'

knowledge this process has been used only for instrument bearings of the

type used in gyroscopes. Titanium nitride coatings are used only for tool

steels to provide much longer service lives [23], and considerable research

3nd development is underway to use TiN for bearings and gears [24, 25].

Tests are currently underway in our laboratories to test the performance of

both gimbal and spin bearings with TiC- and TiN-coated balls. Upon the

conclusion of these and other component-level tests, it is critical that

results be incorporated into system testing to demonstrate the effecti're-

ness of these technologies for space applications.

It is currently easier to select the necessary synthetic oils and

hard-coated bearing parts for space applications than it is to select non-

traditional bearing-retainer materials. However, polymeric materials have

been developed and are used for certain applications [26]. In addition,

experimental work with specially designed retainers for solid-lubricated

bearings has been done [27], and numerous sacrificial-type retainer

materials are available commercially [7]. Commonly used phenolic-based

materials are undesirable for very long-life applications because of their

19

Page 25: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

irreproducible, time-dependent oil absorption properties (Fig. 5). The

data for Fig. 5 were obtained from samples that had been vacuum impregnated

with oil and then allowed to soak in the oil for the times indicated. It

is not surprising that such retainer material acts as a sink for oil in a

bearing, rather than as a source (28]. The development of new materials

having reproducible properties is imperative if reliable, very long-life

bearings and MMAs are to be produced for future space missions.

20

Page 26: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

0.14o No. 1219.a 0.12 o No. 1252

S0.10 o No. 1256

0.08

: 0.06C-0S0.04

" ~ ~002 A '

40 80 120 160 200 400DAYS

Fig. 5. Absorption of Oil by Phenolic Retainers as a Function of Timefor Three Samples of Phenolic Material. (A) Vacuum bakeat -1000C for 24 hr. (B) Soxhlet extraction in Freon TF.(C) Vacuum impregnation with KG-80 oil. Time after pointindicates storage in KG-80 oil. Initial sample weights wereas follows: #1219 -- 4.2038 g, #1252 -- 4.19905 g, #1256 --4.20595 g.

21

Page 27: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

V. CONCLUSIONS

The increased demands for pointing accuracy, targeting versatility

large structures, and long lifetimes of moving mechanical systems require

that very careful consideration be given to tribology in SDI and other

advanced space systems. Examples of specific areas of need are the condi-

tions of boundary lubrication, such as are produced by the dithering action

of gimbal bearings; the insufficient supply of lubricant to critical con-

tact surfaces, as in the case of spin bearings for CMGs; the need for low

friction and high, constant conductivity in sliding electrical contacts;

and the development of low-wear surfaces for many gear applications. Areas

of existing and new materials technologies that offer the promise of

solving many of these problems are hard coatings for bearing parts;

synthetic hydrocarbon oils; composite retainer materials; and ultralow-

friction, solid lubricant films for bearings and gears.

23

Page 28: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

REFERENCES

1. a. A-. A. Fote, L. M. Dormant' and S. Feuerstein, ASLE Lubr. Eng. 32(10), 542-545 (1976).

b. A. A. Fote, R. A. Slade, and S. Feuerstein, J. Lubr. Technol. 99(2), 158-162 (1977).

c. C. M. Collier and M. Reistad, "Vapor Pressure of Oils, Greases andOil-Impregnated Reservoirs," Proc AIAA 11th Thermophysics Conference,San Diego, Calif., July 14-16, 1976; AIAA Paper 76-435.

2. M. N. Gardos, ASLE Transactions 17 (4), 237-250 (1974).

3. M. R. Dalley and M. G. Warwick, Marconi Space and Defense Systems,Ltd. (England), ESA Report No. REPT-T(F) S/161; ESA-CR9P)-1128, July1978.

4. S. Feuerstein and A. S. Forster, The Aerospace Corporation,TR-0076(6270-30)-3, July 29, 1975.

5. W. Ward, Lubr, Eng. 40, 29-298 (1984).

6. W. F. Ward, ASLE Trans. 22, 193-199 (1979).

7. E. L. McMurtrey, High Performance Solid and Liquid Lubricants--AnIndustrial Guide, Moyes Data Corp., Park Ridge, N.J. (1987), pp. B111-160.

8. H. B. Singer, "Innovative Features of Long-Life Momentum and ReactionWheel Assemblies," Control Science and Technology for the Progress ofSociety; Pre-,. of the 8th Triennial World Cong., Kyoto, Japan, August24-28, 1981. 4 B (A83-2657710-12) Oxford, Pergamon Press (1982),2277-82.

9. L. L. Fehrenbacher and I. C. Oelrich, "Opportunities in FutureMilitary Tribology Research and Development," IDA Paper P-1805,Alexandria, Va., Nov. 1984.

10. D. J. Carre, R. Bauer, and P. D. Fleischauer, ASLE Transactions 26(4), 475-480 (1983).

11. P. M. Gupta, Tribol. Trans. 31, 258-268 (1988).

12. E. P. Kingsbury, "Stable Ball Bearings For Control Moment GyroService," Space Tech; Proc. of the Conf. and Exp., Anaheim, Calif.,Sept. 23-25, 1985 (A86-4D501 19-12). Dearborn, Mich., Soc. of Man.Eng., 1985, 5-35 to 5-45.

25

Page 29: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

13. D. J. Carre, Tribol. Trans. 31 (4), 437-441 (1988).

14. E. W. Roberts - "A Review of Sliding Electrical Contacts for SpaceApplications," ESA Report CR(P), ESTL 52, (1981).

15. H. Hashimoto et al., "Development of a Paddle Drive Mechanism," Proc.of the 15th Int. Symp. on Space Technology and Science, Tokyo, Japan,May 19-23, 1986, pp. 769-774.

16. See for example:a. Mobil Chemical Technical Bulletin SHFBSD72, "Mobil SHF BaseStocks," (Polyalphaolefins).

b. Nye Specialty Lubricants Technical Bulletin "Synthetic HydrocarbonPrecision Lubricating Oils" (Polyalphaolefins).

c. Bray Oil Co. Technical Bulletin, "NPT 4 Lubricating Oil, Synthetic,For Low and High Temperatures i" (Synthetic Ester Base Fluid).

17. a. J. F. Patin, M. Maillat, and H. E. Hintermann, "Use of MoS2 Appliedby PVD on Space Mechanisms," Proc. of 2nd Euro. Space Mechanisms andTribology Symp., Oct 9-11, 1985, Meersburg, FR Germany (ESA AP-23).pp. 173-177.

b. E. W. Roberts, "The Tribology of Sputtered Molybdenum DisulphideFilms," Proc. of Int. Conf. on Tribology; 1. Mech E., July 1-3, 1987,London.

18. R. A. Rowntree and M. J. Todd, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 140, 21-34(1989).

19. P. D. Fleischauer, Thin Solid Films 154, 309-322 (1987).

20. H. Kuwano and K. Nagai, JVSTA 4, 2993-6 (1986).

21. H. J. Boving et al., "High Precision Coated Steel Balls," Proc. of the1987 Symp. on Ball Bearing Technology, March 9-12, 1987, Orlando,Fla. DOD Instrument Bearing Working Group, in cooperation with C. S.Draper Laboratory.

22. H. E. Hintermann, Thin Solid Films 84, 215-243 (1981).

23. J. E. Sundgren and H.T.G. Hentzell, JVSTA 4, 2259-79 (1986).

26

Page 30: AD- 241 6 4 K AEROSPACE REPORT NO

24. -M. N. Gardos, "Physical and Chemical Stabilization of Steel BearingSurfaces with TiN and TiC Hard Coatings," Proc. of Industry/Academic/Government Workship on Conservation and Substitution Technology forCritical Metals in Bearings and Related Components for IndustrialEquipment and Opportunities for Improved Bearing Performance.Cooperative Agreement CD13055, School of Engineering, VanderbiltUniversity and Bureau of Mines, U. S. Dept. of Interior, Dec. 1984.

25. M. N. Gardos, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 140, 325-338 (1989).

26. M. N. Gardos and B. D. McConnell, "Investigation of High-Load, High-Temperature Self-Lubricating Composites," ASLE SP-9 (1982).

27. a. M. N. Gardos, Lubr. Eng. 37 (11), 641-656 (1980).

b. C. R. Meeks, Lubr. Eng. 37 (11), 657-667 (1980).

28. a. L. Dormant and S. Feuerstein, "Nylon Pore Systems," J. Spacecr. andRockets (AIAA). 13, 306 (1976).

b. L. Dormant and S. Feuerstein, "Lubricant Reservoir Systems; ThermalConsiderations," J. Spaceor. and Rockets (AIAA) 13, 755 (1976).

LDC-Fleischauer/1-1208-TOR 27