Upload
lenguyet
View
226
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
62
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Judarwanto Widodo. Keterlambatan bicara-speech delay. 2008. Available
from: http://www.keterlambatan-bicara.blogspot.com
2. Leung KA, Kao PC. Evaluation and management of the child with speech
delay. Am Fam Phys 1999;59:32-45.
3. Klinik Tumbuh Kembang Anak RS. Dr. Kariadi. Studi pendahuluan disfasia
perkembangan. Semarang; 2007.
4. Jonhston MV. Clinical disorder of brain plasticity. Brain dev 2004;26:73-80.
5. Mundkur N. Neuroplasticity in children. Indian J Pediatr 2005;72:855-7.
6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committe on children with disabilities.
Role of the Pediatrician in family-centered early intervention service.
Pediatrics 2001;107:1155-7.
7. Vincer MJ, Cake H, Graven M, Dodds L, McHugh S, Fraboni T. A
population-based study to determine the performance of the cognitive adaptive
test/clinical linguistic and auditory milestone scale to predict the mental
developmental index at 18 months on the bayley scales of infant development-
II in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2005;116:864-7.
8. Accardo PJ, Capute AJ. The capute scales: Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical
Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS). Baltimore: Paul. H.
Brookes Publishing Co; 2005.
9. Terapul Tarigan, Nancy Ervani, Syamsidah Lubis. Pola menonton televisi dan
pengaruhnya terhadap anak. Sari Pediatri. 2007; 9(1):44-47. Available from:
http://www.idai.or.id/saripediatri/pdfile/9-1-8.pdf
10. Strategi pencegahan perilaku negatif pada anak-anak sebagai akibat tayangan
televisi dan model tayangan edukatif untuk anak-anak. Seminar Nasional
Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Kualitas ISO 9001-2008 dan IWA 2 dalam
Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Dosen dan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi UPN
“Veteran” Jawa Timur; 2009 Des 10; Surabaya: Ety D. Susanti, Yuli
Candrasari, Yudiana Indriastuti; 2008
63
11. Oka Lely. Jika anak terlambat bicara. 2008. Available from :
www.balipost.com
12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement. Media use in children
younger than 2 years. J pediatrics 2011;128:5.
13. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Television and DVD/video
viewing in children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2007;161(5):473– 479.
14. Victoria J. Rideout, Elizabeth A. Vandewater, Ellen A. Wartella. Zero to six:
electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Menlo Park,
CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. 2003.
15. Linebarger DL, Walker D. Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and
language outcomes. Am Behav Sci. 2005;48(5):624–645.
16. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Associations between media
viewing and language development in children under age two years. J Pediatr.
2007;151(4):364 –368.
17. Weerasak Chonchaiya, Chandhita Pruksananond. Television viewing
associates with delayed language development. Acta Paediatr. 2008;
97(7):977–982.
18. Anak Agung Ayu W. Antari, I Gusti Ayu T. Windiani, Djauhar Ismail.
Television watching time and cognitive development in young children.
Paediatrica Indonesiana. 2012; 52(1):32-37
19. Dworkin JP, Culatta RA . Oral structural and neuromuscular characteristics in
children with normal and disordered articulation. Journal of Speech and
Hearingm Disorders. 1985;50(2), 150-156.
20. Chaer A. Psiokolinguistik kajian teoritik. Jakarta: Rineka Abdi. 2003
21. Owens RE. Language Development an Introduction, 5th edition. New York:
Allyn and Bacon. 2001.
22. Webster RI. The clinical spectrum of developmental language impairment in
school aged children: language, cognitive and motor findings. Pediatrics
2006;118:1541-9.
64
23. Ansel BM, Landa RM, Stark-Selz RE. Development and disorders of speech
and language. In: Oski FA, DeAngelis CD, editors. Principles and practice of
pediatrics. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:686–700.
24. Simkin Z, Conti G. Evidence of reading difficulty in subgroups of children
with specific language impairment. Child language teaching and therapy
2006;22:315-31.
25. Makum, AH. Gangguan perkembangan berbahasa. Buku ajar ilmu kesehatan
anak. Jakarta: Balai penerbit FKUI. 1991; 56-69.
26. Virginia W, Meredith G. Gangguan bicara dan bahasa. Buku ajar penyakit teli
nga, hidung, tenggorok. Jakarta : EGC. 1997 ; 397-410
27. Departemen Rehabilitasi Medik. Buku laporan pasien rawat jalan. Jakarta.
2006.
28. Wahjuni S. Pemeriksaan penyaring keterlambatan perkembangan bahasa pada
anak batita dengan Early Language Milestone Scale di kelurahan Paseban
Jakarta Pusat. Jakarta. 1998.
29. Smith C, Hill J. Language development and disorders of communication and
oral motor function. Pediatric Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus.
1999.p. 57-79.
30. Silva PA, Williams SM, McGee R. A longitudinal study of children with
developmental language delay at age three; later intelligence , reading and
behavior problems. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29;630-640.
31. Schwartz ER. Speech and language disorders. In: Schwartz MW, editor.
Pediatric primary care: a problem oriented approach. St. Louis: Mosby, 1990:
696–700.
32. Coplan J. Evaluation of the child with delayed speech or language. Pediatr
Ann. 1985;14:203–8.
33. Leung AK, Robson WL, Fagan J, Chopra S, Lim SH. Mental retardation.
J R Soc Health. 1995;115:31–9.
34. Leung AK, Robson WL. Otitis media in infants and children. Drug
Protocol. 1990;5:29–35.
65
35. Schlieper A, Kisilevsky H, Mattingly S, Yorke L. Mild conductive hearing
loss and language development: a one year follow-up study. J Dev Behav
Pediatr. 1985;6:65–8.
36. Shonkoff JP. Language delay: late talking to communication disorder. In:
Rudolph AM, Hoffman JI, Rudolph CD, editors. Rudolph's pediatrics.
London: Prentice-Hall. 1996:124–8.
37. Bishop DV. Developmental disorders of speech and language. In: Rutter M,
Taylor E, Hersov L, eds. Child and adolescent psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell
Science. 1994:546–68.
38. Davis H, Stroud A, Green L. The maternal language environment of
children with language delay. Br J Disord Commun. 1988;23:253–66.
39. American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on children with disabilities.
identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the
medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening.
Pediatrics 2006;118:405-19.
40. Dhamayanti Meita, Herlina Murfariza. Skrining gangguan kognitif dan bahasa
dengan menggunakan capute scales (Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical
Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale-Cat/Clams). Sari Pediatri.
2009;11(3):189-98).
41. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja. 2005.
42. Kamila B. Mistry, Cynthia S. Minkovitz, Donna M. Strobino and Dina L.G.
Children's television exposure and behavioral and social outcomes at 5.5
years: does timing of exposure matter? Pediatrics. Vol. 120(4), 2007:762-769
p. Available from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/
43. Amy B. Jordan, James C. Hersey, Judith A. McDivitt, Carrie D. Heitzler.
Reducing children’s television-viewing time: a qualitative study of parents
and their children. Pediatrics. Vol. 118(5), 2006:e1303-e1310 p. Available
from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/
44. Rideout VJ, Hamel E. The media family: electronic media in the lives of
infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their parents. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser
Family Foundation; 2006.
66
45. Committee on Public Education. Media education, J. Pediatrics 1999;104:342-
3.
46. Roberts DF, Foehr UG. Kids and Media in America. Cambridge, United
Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
47. Vandewater EA, Park SE, Huang X, Wartella EA. No: you can’t watch that-
parental rules and young children’s media use. Am Behav Sci.
2005;48(5):608-623.
48. Anderson DR, Evans MK. Peril and potential of media for infants and
toddlers. Zero to Three. 2001;22(2):10-16.
49. Kirkorian HL, Pempek TA, Murphy LA, Schmidt ME, Anderson DR. The
impact of background television on parent-child interaction. Child Dev.
2009;80(5):1350-1359.
50. Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of
Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1995.
51. Masako T, Okuma K, Kyoshima K. Television viewing and reduced parental
utterance, and delayed speech development in infants and young children.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(6):618-619.
52. Schmidt ME, Pempek TA, Kirkorian HL, Lund AF, Anderson DR. The effects
of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children.
Child Dev. 2008;79(4):1137-1151.
53. Dimitri A. Christakis. The effects of infant media usage: what do we know
and what should we learn? Acta Paediatrica 2009;98: 8-16.
54. Hooper ML, Chang P. Comparison of demands of sustained attentional events
between public and private children’s television programming. Percept Mot
Skills. 1998; 86:431–434.
55. Amy Nathanson. Parental mediation of media effects. In Schement, Jorge
Reina, et al, editors. Encyclopedia of communication and information. New
York: Macmillan reference USA; 2002. p. 154-175
56. M. Sopiyudin Dahlan. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan. Edisi ke-5.
Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2011.
71
Lampiran 4. Informed Consent
LEMBAR INFORMASI CALON SUBJEK
JUDUL PENELITIAN : Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan
Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun
di Semarang
PENELITI : Ani Safitri
Bapak/Ibu Yth,
Saya mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro yang melakukan
penelitian dengan judul “Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan
Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang”. Penelitian ini telah memiliki izin
tertulis dari pihak-pihak yang berwenang. Dalam penelitian ini, saya ingin mencari
informasi mengenai pola menonton televisi dan keterlambatan bicara pada anak usia 1-3
tahun. Saya akan menjelaskan tujuan, tata cara penelitian, dan menanyakan kesediaan
untuk berpartisipasi kepada orang tua responden sebagai wakil dari responden. Jika orang
tua responden bersedia, orang tua responden akan menjalani wawancara dan responden
akan menjalani pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara. Tidak terdapat risiko negatif pada
penelitian ini. Orang tua responden hanya diminta meluangkan waktu untuk melakukan
wawancara dan memberi izin saya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara
pada responden. Dengan berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini, orang tua responden dapat
mengetahui lebih dini apakah responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara
sehingga dapat ditindaklanjuti dengan cepat dan tepat. Seluruh informasi yang didapatkan
selama penelitan termasuk data pribadi dan data penelitian akan dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Nama responden atau dokumen lain yang mengidentifikasikan responden sebagai subjek
penelitian tidak akan dibuka tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari orang tua responden. Apabila
ditengah perjalanan orang tua responden mengundurkan diri dari penelitian, saya sangat
menghargai keputusan tersebut dan tidak akan mengenakan sanksi apapun. Jika
responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara, akan dirujuk ke Klinik Tumbuh
Kembang Anak RSUP Dr. Kariadi dengan dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) sebagai
penanggung jawab.
Jika Bapak/Ibu mempunyai pertanyaan mengenai penelitian ini, dapat menghubungi:
Ani Safitri (085641196888)
dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) (pembimbing)
dr. Gana Adyaksa, MSi.Med ( pembimbing)
FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS DIPENOGORO SEMARANG
Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang ,Semarang, Kotak Pos 1269
No Telpon : 024-76928011
Faksimile : 024-76928011
Email : [email protected]
72
LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN SUBJEK PENELITIAN
(Informed Consent)
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama :
Alamat :
Telp :
Orangtua kandung/wali dari:
Nama :
TPA / PAUD :
Menerangkan bahwa setelah menerima sepenuhnya penjelasan tentang penelitian
“Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia
1-3 Tahun di Semarang” saya, mewakili responden, menyatakan
SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU
untuk ikut dalam penelitian ini.
Demikian surat persetujuan ini kami buat dengan sesungguhnya dan penuh
kesadaran untuk dapat dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya.
Semarang, ........................ 2013
Peneliti Orang tua/wali yang menyetujui
(Ani Safitri) (………........................................)
Mengetahui saksi-saksi
1. _______________________
2. _______________________
73
Lampiran 5. Spreadsheet data penelitian
No Nama Usia (bulan)
Sex Pendidikan Ayah
Pendidikan Ibu
pekerjaan ayah
pekerjaan ibu
Status ekonomi
Pengasuh Pendidikan pengasuh
Jumlah TV
TV di kamar
Durasi menonton
TV
Onset menonton
TV
Program TV
Pendampingan Intepretasi Capute
1 NA 25 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
2 FF 19 Perempuan SMA SMA Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Tidak
Didampingi Normal
3 FT 30 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi SMA Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
4 AF 33 Laki-laki SMA SMA Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja Menengah Saudara SD 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi Tidak
Didampingi Normal
5 AK 23 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SMP
> 1buah Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
6 LS 32 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
7 SA 30 Perempuan SMA SMA Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
8 DA 32 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SD 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
9 MA 29 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA
> 1buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Tidak
Didampingi Normal
10 ZP 29 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
11 SH 34 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SD 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
74
hari keduanya Bicara
12 CQ 34 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
13 AD 34 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
14 NI 19 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain
Perguruan Tinggi
> 1buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
15 FA 25 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SD 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
16 KB 34 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain
Perguruan Tinggi
> 1buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Tidak
Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
17 MQ 23 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan Edukasi
Tidak Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
18 MN 34 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA
> 1buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
19 HA 31 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
20 TA 23 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SMA
> 1buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
21 BB 23 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi SMA Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA
> 1buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
22 MA 33 Laki-laki SMA SMA Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
23 AC 27 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SD 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
75
24 AA 25 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi SMA Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA
> 1buah Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Tidak
Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
25 KM 34 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi SMA Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
26 ER 21 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SD
> 1buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
27 MAH 31 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi SMA Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain
Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
28 ARJ 27 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi SMA Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain
Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
29 AKA 24 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
30 MKM 36 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara
Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
31 AMI 30 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain
Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
32 KTA 32 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain
Perguruan Tinggi 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
33 CRY 31 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SMP 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
34 KZP 25 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
35 ASD 32 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
36 KAT 23 Perem Perguruan Perguruan Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Orang SMA 1 buah Tidak <1 jam dan 0-24 Bulan hiburan Didampingi Normal
76
puan Tinggi Tinggi Lain Ada 1-2 jam per hari
dan keduanya
37 KSP 21 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi Saudara SD
> 1buah Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
38 MPA 35 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMP
> 1buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
39 MPRN 15 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Orang Lain SMP
> 1buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
40 FJV 27 Laki-laki
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA
> 1buah Ada
>2 jam per hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi
Suspek Keterlambatan
Bicara
41 ART 19 Perempuan
Perguruan Tinggi
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara SD 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi Normal
42 ARL 32 Perempuan SMA
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah
Tidak Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari >24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
43 BGA 29 Laki-laki SMA
Perguruan Tinggi Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang Lain SMA 1 buah Ada
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam per
hari 0-24 Bulan
hiburan dan
keduanya Didampingi Normal
77
Lampiran 6. Hasil analisis penelitian
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Descriptives
Durasi Menonton Televisi Statistic Std. Error
Usia dalam Bulan <1 Jam Mean 27.00 1.680
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 23.20
Upper Bound 30.80
5% Trimmed Mean 27.11
Median 28.50
Variance 28.222
Std. Deviation 5.312
Minimum 19
Maximum 33
Range 14
Interquartile Range 10
Skewness -.506 .687
Kurtosis -1.195 1.334
1-2 Jam Mean 28.75 1.222
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 26.19
Upper Bound 31.31
5% Trimmed Mean 29.11
Median 29.50
Variance 29.882
Std. Deviation 5.466
Minimum 15
Maximum 36
Range 21
Interquartile Range 9
Skewness -.872 .512
Kurtosis .440 .992
>2 Jam Mean 27.69 1.491
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 24.44
Upper Bound 30.94
5% Trimmed Mean 27.82
Median 27.00
Variance 28.897
Std. Deviation 5.376
Minimum 19
78
Maximum 34
Range 15
Interquartile Range 10
Skewness -.161 .616
Kurtosis -1.558 1.191
Tests of Normality
Durasi
Menonton
Televisi
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Usia dalam Bulan <1 Jam .214 10 .200* .896 10 .198
1-2 Jam .168 20 .140 .931 20 .161
>2 Jam .192 13 .200* .898 13 .124
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Oneway
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Usia dalam Bulan
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.095 2 40 .910
ANOVA
Usia dalam Bulan
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 22.458 2 11.229 .384 .683
Within Groups 1168.519 40 29.213
Total 1190.977 42
Onset Menonton Televisi
Descriptives
Onset Menonton Televisi Statistic Std. Error
Usia dalam Bulan 0-24 Bulan Mean 27.97 .973
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 25.98
Upper Bound 29.95
5% Trimmed Mean 28.18
Median 29.50
Variance 30.289
Std. Deviation 5.504
Minimum 15
Maximum 36
Range 21
79
Interquartile Range 10
Skewness -.391 .414
Kurtosis -.817 .809
>24 Bulan Mean 28.18 1.512
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 24.81
Upper Bound 31.55
5% Trimmed Mean 28.37
Median 29.00
Variance 25.164
Std. Deviation 5.016
Minimum 19
Maximum 34
Range 15
Interquartile Range 5
Skewness -1.159 .661
Kurtosis .442 1.279
Tests of Normality
Onset
Menonton
Televisi
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Usia dalam Bulan 0-24 Bulan .144 32 .090 .931 32 .041
>24 Bulan .225 11 .125 .842 11 .033
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Descriptives
Onset Menonton Televisi Statistic Std. Error
trans_usia 0-24 Bulan Mean 1.4377 .01629
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 1.4045
Upper Bound 1.4709
5% Trimmed Mean 1.4438
Median 1.4698
Variance .008
Std. Deviation .09213
Minimum 1.18
Maximum 1.56
Range .38
Interquartile Range .16
Skewness -.806 .414
Kurtosis .350 .809
80
>24 Bulan Mean 1.4427 .02615
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 1.3844
Upper Bound 1.5009
5% Trimmed Mean 1.4469
Median 1.4624
Variance .008
Std. Deviation .08672
Minimum 1.28
Maximum 1.53
Range .25
Interquartile Range .07
Skewness -1.383 .661
Kurtosis .853 1.279
Tests of Normality
Onset
Menonton
Televisi
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
trans_usia 0-24 Bulan .166 32 .026 .910 32 .011
>24 Bulan .266 11 .028 .791 11 .007
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Mann-Whitney Test
Test Statisticsb
Usia dalam
Bulan
Mann-Whitney U 172.500
Wilcoxon W 238.500
Z -.098
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .922
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .924a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Onset Menonton Televisi
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Descriptives
Program Televisi yang ditonton Statistic Std. Error
Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi Mean 28.60 3.172
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 19.79
Upper Bound 37.41
5% Trimmed Mean 28.83
Median 33.00
81
Variance 50.300
Std. Deviation 7.092
Minimum 19
Maximum 34
Range 15
Interquartile Range 13
Skewness -.771 .913
Kurtosis -2.293 2.000
Hiburan Mean 27.64 1.146
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 25.25
Upper Bound 30.02
5% Trimmed Mean 27.91
Median 29.50
Variance 28.909
Std. Deviation 5.377
Minimum 15
Maximum 35
Range 20
Interquartile Range 8
Skewness -.736 .491
Kurtosis -.230 .953
Keduanya Mean 28.38 1.251
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 25.71
Upper Bound 31.04
5% Trimmed Mean 28.47
Median 29.00
Variance 25.050
Std. Deviation 5.005
Minimum 19
Maximum 36
Range 17
Interquartile Range 10
Skewness -.195 .564
Kurtosis -.993 1.091
82
Tests of Normality
Program
Televisi
yang
ditonton
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi .333 5 .074 .792 5 .070
Hiburan .170 22 .098 .932 22 .133
Keduanya .125 16 .200* .952 16 .523
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Oneway
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Usia dalam Bulan
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
1.002 2 40 .376
ANOVA
Usia dalam Bulan
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 6.936 2 3.468 .117 .890
Within Groups 1184.041 40 29.601
Total 1190.977 42
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Descriptives
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Statistic Std. Error
Usia dalam
Bulan
Tidak
Didampingi
Mean 27.17 2.400
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 21.00
Upper Bound 33.34
5% Trimmed Mean 27.24
Median 27.00
Variance 34.567
Std. Deviation 5.879
Minimum 19
Maximum 34
Range 15
Interquartile Range 11
Skewness -.153 .845
Kurtosis -1.492 1.741
Didampingi Mean 28.16 .872
95% Confidence Lower Bound 26.39
83
Interval for Mean Upper Bound 29.93
5% Trimmed Mean 28.38
Median 30.00
Variance 28.140
Std. Deviation 5.305
Minimum 15
Maximum 36
Range 21
Interquartile Range 9
Skewness -.589 .388
Kurtosis -.513 .759
Tests of Normality
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Usia dalam
Bulan
Tidak
Didampingi
.173 6 .200* .949 6 .729
Didampingi .149 37 .037 .939 37 .043
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Descriptives
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Statistic Std. Error
trans_usia Tidak
Didampingi
Mean 1.4251 .03983
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 1.3227
Upper Bound 1.5275
5% Trimmed Mean 1.4274
Median 1.4302
Variance .010
Std. Deviation .09758
Minimum 1.28
Maximum 1.53
Range .25
Interquartile Range .18
Skewness -.434 .845
Kurtosis -.986 1.741
Didampingi Mean 1.4412 .01474
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Lower Bound 1.4113
Upper Bound 1.4711
84
5% Trimmed Mean 1.4473
Median 1.4771
Variance .008
Std. Deviation .08969
Minimum 1.18
Maximum 1.56
Range .38
Interquartile Range .13
Skewness -.996 .388
Kurtosis .630 .759
Tests of Normality
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
trans_usia Tidak Didampingi .164 6 .200* .946 6 .707
Didampingi .169 37 .009 .906 37 .004
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Mann-Whitney Test
Test Statisticsb
Usia dalam
Bulan
Mann-Whitney U 99.500
Wilcoxon W 120.500
Z -.405
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .686
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .694a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Jenis Kelamin * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Count 4 8 8 20
Expected Count 4.7 9.3 6.0 20.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 40.0% 61.5% 46.5%
% of Total 9.3% 18.6% 18.6% 46.5%
Perempuan Count 6 12 5 23
85
Expected Count 5.3 10.7 7.0 23.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0% 60.0% 38.5% 53.5%
% of Total 14.0% 27.9% 11.6% 53.5%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.691a 2 .429
Likelihood Ratio 1.697 2 .428
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.169 1 .280
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.65.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .183
Positive .183
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .597
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .868
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin
Jenis Kelamin * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Count 17 3 20
Expected Count 14.9 5.1 20.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
53.1% 27.3% 46.5%
% of Total 39.5% 7.0% 46.5%
Perempuan Count 15 8 23
Expected Count 17.1 5.9 23.0
86
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
46.9% 72.7% 53.5%
% of Total 34.9% 18.6% 53.5%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.199a 1 .138
Continuity Correctionb 1.283 1 .257
Likelihood Ratio 2.274 1 .132
Fisher's Exact Test .175 .128
Linear-by-Linear
Association
2.148 1 .143
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.12.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Jenis Kelamin * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Count 2 9 9 20
Expected Count 2.3 10.2 7.4 20.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
40.0% 40.9% 56.3% 46.5%
% of Total 4.7% 20.9% 20.9% 46.5%
Perempuan Count 3 13 7 23
Expected Count 2.7 11.8 8.6 23.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
60.0% 59.1% 43.8% 53.5%
% of Total 7.0% 30.2% 16.3% 53.5%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
87
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .973a 2 .615
Likelihood Ratio .974 2 .615
Linear-by-Linear Association .766 1 .381
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .146
Positive .146
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .476
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .977
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin
Jenis Kelamin * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Count 2 18 20
Expected Count 2.8 17.2 20.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
33.3% 48.6% 46.5%
% of Total 4.7% 41.9% 46.5%
Perempuan Count 4 19 23
Expected Count 3.2 19.8 23.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
66.7% 51.4% 53.5%
% of Total 9.3% 44.2% 53.5%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
88
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .487a 1 .485
Continuity Correctionb .066 1 .798
Likelihood Ratio .497 1 .481
Fisher's Exact Test .669 .403
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.475 1 .490
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Status Gizi * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Status Gizi * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Status Gizi * Program Televisi yang ditonton
89
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Status Gizi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ayah
SMA Count 4 2 0 6
Expected Count 1.4 2.8 1.8 6.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 10.0% .0% 14.0%
% of Total 9.3% 4.7% .0% 14.0%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 6 18 13 37
Expected Count 8.6 17.2 11.2 37.0
90
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0% 90.0% 100.0% 86.0%
% of Total 14.0% 41.9% 30.2% 86.0%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ayah
SMA Count 5 1 6
Expected Count 4.5 1.5 6.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
15.6% 9.1% 14.0%
% of Total 11.6% 2.3% 14.0%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 27 10 37
Expected Count 27.5 9.5 37.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
84.4% 90.9% 86.0%
% of Total 62.8% 23.3% 86.0%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ayah
SMA Count 1 4 1 6
Expected Count .7 3.1 2.2 6.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
20.0% 18.2% 6.3% 14.0%
% of Total 2.3% 9.3% 2.3% 14.0%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 4 18 15 37
Expected Count 4.3 18.9 13.8 37.0
91
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
80.0% 81.8% 93.8% 86.0%
% of Total 9.3% 41.9% 34.9% 86.0%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua
/ Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ayah
SMA Count 2 4 6
Expected Count .8 5.2 6.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
33.3% 10.8% 14.0%
% of Total 4.7% 9.3% 14.0%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 4 33 37
Expected Count 5.2 31.8 37.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
66.7% 89.2% 86.0%
% of Total 9.3% 76.7% 86.0%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ibu
SMA Count 6 3 1 10
Expected Count 2.3 4.7 3.0 10.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0% 15.0% 7.7% 23.3%
92
% of Total 14.0% 7.0% 2.3% 23.3%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 4 17 12 33
Expected Count 7.7 15.3 10.0 33.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 85.0% 92.3% 76.7%
% of Total 9.3% 39.5% 27.9% 76.7%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.093a 2 .006
Likelihood Ratio 9.222 2 .010
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.795 1 .005
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .479
Positive .000
Negative -.479
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.326
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .059
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu
Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ibu
SMA Count 7 3 10
Expected Count 7.4 2.6 10.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
21.9% 27.3% 23.3%
% of Total 16.3% 7.0% 23.3%
93
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 25 8 33
Expected Count 24.6 8.4 33.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
78.1% 72.7% 76.7%
% of Total 58.1% 18.6% 76.7%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .134a 1 .715
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .130 1 .718
Fisher's Exact Test .698 .504
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.131 1 .718
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ibu
SMA Count 1 7 2 10
Expected Count 1.2 5.1 3.7 10.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
20.0% 31.8% 12.5% 23.3%
% of Total 2.3% 16.3% 4.7% 23.3%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 4 15 14 33
Expected Count 3.8 16.9 12.3 33.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
80.0% 68.2% 87.5% 76.7%
% of Total 9.3% 34.9% 32.6% 76.7%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
94
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.971a 2 .373
Likelihood Ratio 2.060 2 .357
Linear-by-Linear Association .731 1 .393
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.16.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .224
Positive .021
Negative -.224
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .621
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .835
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu
Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua
/ Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ibu
SMA Count 3 7 10
Expected Count 1.4 8.6 10.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 18.9% 23.3%
% of Total 7.0% 16.3% 23.3%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 3 30 33
Expected Count 4.6 28.4 33.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 81.1% 76.7%
% of Total 7.0% 69.8% 76.7%
95
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.794a 1 .095
Continuity Correctionb 1.324 1 .250
Likelihood Ratio 2.431 1 .119
Fisher's Exact Test .127 .127
Linear-by-Linear
Association
2.729 1 .099
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pekerjaan Ayah * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Pekerjaan Ayah * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
96
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Pekerjaan Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Pekerjaan Ayah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Pekerjaan Ibu * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
97
Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count 2 1 1 4
Expected Count .9 1.9 1.2 4.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
20.0% 5.0% 7.7% 9.3%
% of Total 4.7% 2.3% 2.3% 9.3%
Bekerja Count 8 19 12 39
Expected Count 9.1 18.1 11.8 39.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
80.0% 95.0% 92.3% 90.7%
% of Total 18.6% 44.2% 27.9% 90.7%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.835a 2 .399
Likelihood Ratio 1.615 2 .446
Linear-by-Linear Association .831 1 .362
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .93.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .295
Positive .000
Negative -.295
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .562
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .911
a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu
Pekerjaan IBu * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count 3 1 4
Expected Count 3.0 1.0 4.0
98
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
9.4% 9.1% 9.3%
% of Total 7.0% 2.3% 9.3%
Bekerja Count 29 10 39
Expected Count 29.0 10.0 39.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
90.6% 90.9% 90.7%
% of Total 67.4% 23.3% 90.7%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .001a 1 .978
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .001 1 .978
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .733
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.001 1 .978
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pekerjaan IBu * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count 1 1 2 4
Expected Count .5 2.0 1.5 4.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
20.0% 4.5% 12.5% 9.3%
% of Total 2.3% 2.3% 4.7% 9.3%
Bekerja Count 4 21 14 39
Expected Count 4.5 20.0 14.5 39.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
80.0% 95.5% 87.5% 90.7%
% of Total 9.3% 48.8% 32.6% 90.7%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
99
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.462a 2 .481
Likelihood Ratio 1.418 2 .492
Linear-by-Linear Association .000 1 .985
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .47.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .147
Positive .141
Negative -.147
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .281
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu
Pekerjaan IBu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count 3 1 4
Expected Count .6 3.4 4.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 2.7% 9.3%
% of Total 7.0% 2.3% 9.3%
Bekerja Count 3 36 39
Expected Count 5.4 33.6 39.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 97.3% 90.7%
% of Total 7.0% 83.7% 90.7%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
100
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.689a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 8.657 1 .003
Likelihood Ratio 9.103 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .006 .006
Linear-by-Linear
Association
13.371 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Status Ekonomi * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count 5 4 3 12
Expected Count 2.8 5.6 3.6 12.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0% 20.0% 23.1% 27.9%
% of Total 11.6% 9.3% 7.0% 27.9%
Tinggi Count 5 16 10 31
Expected Count 7.2 14.4 9.4 31.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0% 80.0% 76.9% 72.1%
% of Total 11.6% 37.2% 23.3% 72.1%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.198a 2 .202
Likelihood Ratio 2.994 2 .224
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.715 1 .190
101
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.79.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .255
Positive .000
Negative -.255
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .751
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .625
a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi
Status Ekonomi * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count 7 5 12
Expected Count 8.9 3.1 12.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
21.9% 45.5% 27.9%
% of Total 16.3% 11.6% 27.9%
Tinggi Count 25 6 31
Expected Count 23.1 7.9 31.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
78.1% 54.5% 72.1%
% of Total 58.1% 14.0% 72.1%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.262a 1 .133
Continuity Correctionb 1.242 1 .265
Likelihood Ratio 2.139 1 .144
Fisher's Exact Test .241 .133
Linear-by-Linear
Association
2.210 1 .137
102
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Status Ekonomi * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count 2 8 2 12
Expected Count 1.4 6.1 4.5 12.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
40.0% 36.4% 12.5% 27.9%
% of Total 4.7% 18.6% 4.7% 27.9%
Tinggi Count 3 14 14 31
Expected Count 3.6 15.9 11.5 31.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
60.0% 63.6% 87.5% 72.1%
% of Total 7.0% 32.6% 32.6% 72.1%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.033a 2 .219
Likelihood Ratio 3.290 2 .193
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.516 1 .113
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.40.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .285
Positive .000
Negative -.285
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .838
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .484
103
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .285
Positive .000
Negative -.285
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .838
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .484
a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi
Status Ekonomi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count 4 8 12
Expected Count 1.7 10.3 12.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
66.7% 21.6% 27.9%
% of Total 9.3% 18.6% 27.9%
Tinggi Count 2 29 31
Expected Count 4.3 26.7 31.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
33.3% 78.4% 72.1%
% of Total 4.7% 67.4% 72.1%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.207a 1 .022
Continuity Correctionb 3.209 1 .073
Likelihood Ratio 4.646 1 .031
Fisher's Exact Test .042 .042
Linear-by-Linear
Association
5.086 1 .024
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
104
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.207a 1 .022
Continuity Correctionb 3.209 1 .073
Likelihood Ratio 4.646 1 .031
Fisher's Exact Test .042 .042
Linear-by-Linear
Association
5.086 1 .024
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pengasuh Anak * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pengasuh Anak Saudara Count 5 2 3 10
Expected Count 2.3 4.7 3.0 10.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0% 10.0% 23.1% 23.3%
% of Total 11.6% 4.7% 7.0% 23.3%
Orang Lain Count 5 18 10 33
Expected Count 7.7 15.3 10.0 33.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0% 90.0% 76.9% 76.7%
% of Total 11.6% 41.9% 23.3% 76.7%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.977a 2 .050
Likelihood Ratio 5.730 2 .057
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.748 1 .186
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
105
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .348
Positive .000
Negative -.348
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .965
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .309
a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak
Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pengasuh Anak Saudara Count 8 2 10
Expected Count 7.4 2.6 10.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
25.0% 18.2% 23.3%
% of Total 18.6% 4.7% 23.3%
Orang Lain Count 24 9 33
Expected Count 24.6 8.4 33.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
75.0% 81.8% 76.7%
% of Total 55.8% 20.9% 76.7%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .213a 1 .644
Continuity Correctionb .002 1 .962
Likelihood Ratio .221 1 .638
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .496
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.208 1 .648
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
106
Pengasuh Anak * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pengasuh Anak Saudara Count 2 4 4 10
Expected Count 1.2 5.1 3.7 10.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
40.0% 18.2% 25.0% 23.3%
% of Total 4.7% 9.3% 9.3% 23.3%
Orang Lain Count 3 18 12 33
Expected Count 3.8 16.9 12.3 33.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
60.0% 81.8% 75.0% 76.7%
% of Total 7.0% 41.9% 27.9% 76.7%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.130a 2 .568
Likelihood Ratio 1.055 2 .590
Linear-by-Linear Association .094 1 .759
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.16.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .109
Positive .036
Negative -.109
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .302
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak
Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
107
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pengasuh Anak Saudara Count 2 8 10
Expected Count 1.4 8.6 10.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
33.3% 21.6% 23.3%
% of Total 4.7% 18.6% 23.3%
Orang Lain Count 4 29 33
Expected Count 4.6 28.4 33.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
66.7% 78.4% 76.7%
% of Total 9.3% 67.4% 76.7%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .397a 1 .529
Continuity Correctionb .012 1 .913
Likelihood Ratio .370 1 .543
Fisher's Exact Test .611 .429
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.388 1 .534
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh Anak
SD Count 4 3 1 8
Expected Count 1.9 3.7 2.4 8.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 15.0% 7.7% 18.6%
% of Total 9.3% 7.0% 2.3% 18.6%
108
SMP Count 0 2 2 4
Expected Count .9 1.9 1.2 4.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
.0% 10.0% 15.4% 9.3%
% of Total .0% 4.7% 4.7% 9.3%
SMA Count 5 12 7 24
Expected Count 5.6 11.2 7.3 24.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0% 60.0% 53.8% 55.8%
% of Total 11.6% 27.9% 16.3% 55.8%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 1 3 3 7
Expected Count 1.6 3.3 2.1 7.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
10.0% 15.0% 23.1% 16.3%
% of Total 2.3% 7.0% 7.0% 16.3%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.654a 6 .463
Likelihood Ratio 6.128 6 .409
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.250 1 .134
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .93.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh
SD-SMP Count 4 5 3 12
Expected Count 2.8 5.6 3.6 12.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 25.0% 23.1% 27.9%
% of Total 9.3% 11.6% 7.0% 27.9%
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 6 15 10 31
Expected Count 7.2 14.4 9.4 31.0
109
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0% 75.0% 76.9% 72.1%
% of Total 14.0% 34.9% 23.3% 72.1%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .962a 2 .618
Likelihood Ratio .919 2 .632
Linear-by-Linear Association .719 1 .396
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.79.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .140
Positive .000
Negative -.140
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .411
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .996
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh Anak
SD Count 6 2 8
Expected Count 6.0 2.0 8.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
18.8% 18.2% 18.6%
% of Total 14.0% 4.7% 18.6%
SMP Count 4 0 4
Expected Count 3.0 1.0 4.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
12.5% .0% 9.3%
110
% of Total 9.3% .0% 9.3%
SMA Count 18 6 24
Expected Count 17.9 6.1 24.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
56.3% 54.5% 55.8%
% of Total 41.9% 14.0% 55.8%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 4 3 7
Expected Count 5.2 1.8 7.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
12.5% 27.3% 16.3%
% of Total 9.3% 7.0% 16.3%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.478a 3 .479
Likelihood Ratio 3.352 3 .340
Linear-by-Linear Association .710 1 .399
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.02.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
Total
0-24
Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh
SD-SMP Count 10 2 12
Expected Count 8.9 3.1 12.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
31.3% 18.2% 27.9%
% of Total 23.3% 4.7% 27.9%
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 22 9 31
Expected Count 23.1 7.9 31.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
68.8% 81.8% 72.1%
111
% of Total 51.2% 20.9% 72.1%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .695a 1 .405
Continuity Correctionb .197 1 .657
Likelihood Ratio .738 1 .390
Fisher's Exact Test .698 .339
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.679 1 .410
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh Anak
SD Count 2 5 1 8
Expected Count .9 4.1 3.0 8.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
40.0% 22.7% 6.3% 18.6%
% of Total 4.7% 11.6% 2.3% 18.6%
SMP Count 0 3 1 4
Expected Count .5 2.0 1.5 4.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
.0% 13.6% 6.3% 9.3%
% of Total .0% 7.0% 2.3% 9.3%
SMA Count 3 10 11 24
Expected Count 2.8 12.3 8.9 24.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
60.0% 45.5% 68.8% 55.8%
% of Total 7.0% 23.3% 25.6% 55.8%
Perguruan Count 0 4 3 7
112
Tinggi Expected Count .8 3.6 2.6 7.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
.0% 18.2% 18.8% 16.3%
% of Total .0% 9.3% 7.0% 16.3%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.655a 6 .463
Likelihood Ratio 7.027 6 .318
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.172 1 .075
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .47.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh
SD-SMP Count 2 8 2 12
Expected Count 1.4 6.1 4.5 12.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
40.0% 36.4% 12.5% 27.9%
% of Total 4.7% 18.6% 4.7% 27.9%
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 3 14 14 31
Expected Count 3.6 15.9 11.5 31.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
60.0% 63.6% 87.5% 72.1%
% of Total 7.0% 32.6% 32.6% 72.1%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
113
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh
SD-SMP Count 2 8 2 12
Expected Count 1.4 6.1 4.5 12.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
40.0% 36.4% 12.5% 27.9%
% of Total 4.7% 18.6% 4.7% 27.9%
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 3 14 14 31
Expected Count 3.6 15.9 11.5 31.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
60.0% 63.6% 87.5% 72.1%
% of Total 7.0% 32.6% 32.6% 72.1%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.033a 2 .219
Likelihood Ratio 3.290 2 .193
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.516 1 .113
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.40.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .078
Positive .078
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .229
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh
114
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua
/ Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh Anak
SD Count 1 7 8
Expected Count 1.1 6.9 8.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
16.7% 18.9% 18.6%
% of Total 2.3% 16.3% 18.6%
SMP Count 0 4 4
Expected Count .6 3.4 4.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
.0% 10.8% 9.3%
% of Total .0% 9.3% 9.3%
SMA Count 4 20 24
Expected Count 3.3 20.7 24.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
66.7% 54.1% 55.8%
% of Total 9.3% 46.5% 55.8%
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 1 6 7
Expected Count 1.0 6.0 7.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
16.7% 16.2% 16.3%
% of Total 2.3% 14.0% 16.3%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .811a 3 .847
Likelihood Ratio 1.357 3 .716
Linear-by-Linear Association .138 1 .710
115
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .56.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstabulation
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh
SD-SMP Count 1 11 12
Expected Count 1.7 10.3 12.0
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
16.7% 29.7% 27.9%
% of Total 2.3% 25.6% 27.9%
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count 5 26 31
Expected Count 4.3 26.7 31.0
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
83.3% 70.3% 72.1%
% of Total 11.6% 60.5% 72.1%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .438a 1 .508
Continuity Correctionb .029 1 .864
Likelihood Ratio .478 1 .489
Fisher's Exact Test .659 .455
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.428 1 .513
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
116
Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga
10 Count 0 2 0 2
Expected Count .5 .9 .6 2.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
.0% 10.0% .0% 4.7%
% of Total .0% 4.7% .0% 4.7%
3 Count 4 9 7 20
Expected Count 4.7 9.3 6.0 20.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 45.0% 53.8% 46.5%
% of Total 9.3% 20.9% 16.3% 46.5%
4 Count 4 7 4 15
Expected Count 3.5 7.0 4.5 15.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
40.0% 35.0% 30.8% 34.9%
% of Total 9.3% 16.3% 9.3% 34.9%
5 Count 1 1 2 4
Expected Count .9 1.9 1.2 4.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
10.0% 5.0% 15.4% 9.3%
% of Total 2.3% 2.3% 4.7% 9.3%
6 Count 0 1 0 1
Expected Count .2 .5 .3 1.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
.0% 5.0% .0% 2.3%
% of Total .0% 2.3% .0% 2.3%
7 Count 1 0 0 1
Expected Count .2 .5 .3 1.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
10.0% .0% .0% 2.3%
% of Total 2.3% .0% .0% 2.3%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
117
Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga
10 Count 2 0 2
Expected Count 1.5 .5 2.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
6.3% .0% 4.7%
% of Total 4.7% .0% 4.7%
3 Count 16 4 20
Expected Count 14.9 5.1 20.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
50.0% 36.4% 46.5%
% of Total 37.2% 9.3% 46.5%
4 Count 11 4 15
Expected Count 11.2 3.8 15.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
34.4% 36.4% 34.9%
% of Total 25.6% 9.3% 34.9%
5 Count 3 1 4
Expected Count 3.0 1.0 4.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
9.4% 9.1% 9.3%
% of Total 7.0% 2.3% 9.3%
6 Count 0 1 1
Expected Count .7 .3 1.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
.0% 9.1% 2.3%
% of Total .0% 2.3% 2.3%
7 Count 0 1 1
Expected Count .7 .3 1.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
.0% 9.1% 2.3%
% of Total .0% 2.3% 2.3%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
118
Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga
10 Count 0 2 0 2
Expected Count .2 1.0 .7 2.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0% 9.1% .0% 4.7%
% of Total .0% 4.7% .0% 4.7%
3 Count 2 11 7 20
Expected Count 2.3 10.2 7.4 20.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
40.0% 50.0% 43.8% 46.5%
% of Total 4.7% 25.6% 16.3% 46.5%
4 Count 2 7 6 15
Expected Count 1.7 7.7 5.6 15.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
40.0% 31.8% 37.5% 34.9%
% of Total 4.7% 16.3% 14.0% 34.9%
5 Count 0 2 2 4
Expected Count .5 2.0 1.5 4.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0% 9.1% 12.5% 9.3%
% of Total .0% 4.7% 4.7% 9.3%
6 Count 0 0 1 1
Expected Count .1 .5 .4 1.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0% .0% 6.3% 2.3%
% of Total .0% .0% 2.3% 2.3%
7 Count 1 0 0 1
Expected Count .1 .5 .4 1.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
20.0% .0% .0% 2.3%
% of Total 2.3% .0% .0% 2.3%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
119
Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga
10 Count 0 2 2
Expected Count .3 1.7 2.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
.0% 5.4% 4.7%
% of Total .0% 4.7% 4.7%
3 Count 2 18 20
Expected Count 2.8 17.2 20.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
33.3% 48.6% 46.5%
% of Total 4.7% 41.9% 46.5%
4 Count 3 12 15
Expected Count 2.1 12.9 15.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 32.4% 34.9%
% of Total 7.0% 27.9% 34.9%
5 Count 0 4 4
Expected Count .6 3.4 4.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
.0% 10.8% 9.3%
% of Total .0% 9.3% 9.3%
6 Count 1 0 1
Expected Count .1 .9 1.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
16.7% .0% 2.3%
% of Total 2.3% .0% 2.3%
7 Count 0 1 1
Expected Count .1 .9 1.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
.0% 2.7% 2.3%
% of Total .0% 2.3% 2.3%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
120
Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah
1 buah Count 9 14 7 30
Expected Count 7.0 14.0 9.1 30.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
90.0% 70.0% 53.8% 69.8%
% of Total 20.9% 32.6% 16.3% 69.8%
> 1buah Count 1 6 6 13
Expected Count 3.0 6.0 3.9 13.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
10.0% 30.0% 46.2% 30.2%
% of Total 2.3% 14.0% 14.0% 30.2%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.504a 2 .173
Likelihood Ratio 3.822 2 .148
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.404 1 .065
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 3.02.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .228
Positive .228
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .687
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .732
a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah
121
Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah
1 buah Count 21 9 30
Expected Count 22.3 7.7 30.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
65.6% 81.8% 69.8%
% of Total 48.8% 20.9% 69.8%
> 1buah Count 11 2 13
Expected Count 9.7 3.3 13.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
34.4% 18.2% 30.2%
% of Total 25.6% 4.7% 30.2%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.018a 1 .313
Continuity Correctionb .395 1 .530
Likelihood Ratio 1.088 1 .297
Fisher's Exact Test .456 .271
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.994 1 .319
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah
1 buah Count 5 15 10 30
Expected Count 3.5 15.3 11.2 30.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 68.2% 62.5% 69.8%
122
% of Total 11.6% 34.9% 23.3% 69.8%
> 1buah Count 0 7 6 13
Expected Count 1.5 6.7 4.8 13.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0% 31.8% 37.5% 30.2%
% of Total .0% 16.3% 14.0% 30.2%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .167
Positive .167
Negative .000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .502
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .963
a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah
Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah
1 buah Count 3 27 30
Expected Count 4.2 25.8 30.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 73.0% 69.8%
% of Total 7.0% 62.8% 69.8%
> 1buah Count 3 10 13
Expected Count 1.8 11.2 13.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
50.0% 27.0% 30.2%
% of Total 7.0% 23.3% 30.2%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
123
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.292a 1 .256
Continuity Correctionb .432 1 .511
Likelihood Ratio 1.204 1 .273
Fisher's Exact Test .345 .248
Linear-by-Linear
Association
1.262 1 .261
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Total <1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur
Tidak
Ada
Count 7 11 9 27
Expected Count 6.3 12.6 8.2 27.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
70.0% 55.0% 69.2% 62.8%
% of Total 16.3% 25.6% 20.9% 62.8%
Ada Count 3 9 4 16
Expected Count 3.7 7.4 4.8 16.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
30.0% 45.0% 30.8% 37.2%
% of Total 7.0% 20.9% 9.3% 37.2%
Total Count 10 20 13 43
Expected Count 10.0 20.0 13.0 43.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 23.3% 46.5% 30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .973a 2 .615
Likelihood Ratio .974 2 .614
Linear-by-Linear Association .002 1 .960
124
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 3.72.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .083
Positive .072
Negative -.083
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .264
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
Total 0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur
Tidak Ada Count 20 7 27
Expected Count 20.1 6.9 27.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
62.5% 63.6% 62.8%
% of Total 46.5% 16.3% 62.8%
Ada Count 12 4 16
Expected Count 11.9 4.1 16.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
37.5% 36.4% 37.2%
% of Total 27.9% 9.3% 37.2%
Total Count 32 11 43
Expected Count 32.0 11.0 43.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .005a 1 .946
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .005 1 .946
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .621
125
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.004 1 .947
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Total Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur
Tidak
Ada
Count 5 10 12 27
Expected Count 3.1 13.8 10.0 27.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 45.5% 75.0% 62.8%
% of Total 11.6% 23.3% 27.9% 62.8%
Ada Count 0 12 4 16
Expected Count 1.9 8.2 6.0 16.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0% 54.5% 25.0% 37.2%
% of Total .0% 27.9% 9.3% 37.2%
Total Count 5 22 16 43
Expected Count 5.0 22.0 16.0 43.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 11.6% 51.2% 37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.814a 2 .033
Likelihood Ratio 8.454 2 .015
Linear-by-Linear Association .002 1 .964
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.86.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .194
Positive .185
Negative -.194
126
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .616
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .842
a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Total
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur
Tidak Ada Count 4 23 27
Expected Count 3.8 23.2 27.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
66.7% 62.2% 62.8%
% of Total 9.3% 53.5% 62.8%
Ada Count 2 14 16
Expected Count 2.2 13.8 16.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
33.3% 37.8% 37.2%
% of Total 4.7% 32.6% 37.2%
Total Count 6 37 43
Expected Count 6.0 37.0 43.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 14.0% 86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .045a 1 .832
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .045 1 .831
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .606
Linear-by-Linear
Association
.044 1 .834
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
127
Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Normal 30 69.8 69.8 69.8
Suspek Terlambat Bicara 13 30.2 30.2 100.0
Total 43 100.0 100.0
Durasi Menonton Televisi * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Total
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara Normal
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
>2 jam per hari Count 12 1 13
Expected Count 3.9 9.1 13.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
92.3% 3.3% 30.2%
% of Total 27.9% 2.3% 30.2%
<1 jam dan 1-2 jam
per hari
Count 1 29 30
Expected Count 9.1 20.9 30.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
7.7% 96.7% 69.8%
% of Total 2.3% 67.4% 69.8%
Total Count 13 30 43
Expected Count 13.0 30.0 43.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 30.2% 69.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 34.041a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 29.953 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 36.883 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
33.249 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 43
128
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.93.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Durasi
Menonton Televisi (>2 jam
per hari / <1 jam dan 1-2 jam
per hari)
348.000 20.084 6029.883
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
27.692 4.006 191.436
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
.080 .012 .524
N of Valid Cases 43
Onset Menonton Televisi * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Total
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara Normal
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan Count 13 19 32
Expected Count 9.7 22.3 32.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
100.0% 63.3% 74.4%
% of Total 30.2% 44.2% 74.4%
>24 Bulan Count 0 11 11
Expected Count 3.3 7.7 11.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
.0% 36.7% 25.6%
% of Total .0% 25.6% 25.6%
Total Count 13 30 43
Expected Count 13.0 30.0 43.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 30.2% 69.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.405a 1 .011
Continuity Correctionb 4.624 1 .032
129
Likelihood Ratio 9.473 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .019 .009
Linear-by-Linear
Association
6.256 1 .012
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
.594 .446 .791
N of Valid Cases 43
Program Televisi yang ditonton * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Total
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara Normal
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Hiburan dan
Keduanya
Count 10 28 38
Expected Count 11.5 26.5 38.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
76.9% 93.3% 88.4%
% of Total 23.3% 65.1% 88.4%
Edukasi Count 3 2 5
Expected Count 1.5 3.5 5.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
23.1% 6.7% 11.6%
% of Total 7.0% 4.7% 11.6%
Total Count 13 30 43
Expected Count 13.0 30.0 43.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 30.2% 69.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.377a 1 .123
130
Continuity Correctionb 1.048 1 .306
Likelihood Ratio 2.171 1 .141
Fisher's Exact Test .153 .153
Linear-by-Linear
Association
2.322 1 .128
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.51.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Program
Televisi yang ditonton
(Hiburan dan Keduanya /
Edukasi)
.238 .035 1.639
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
.439 .180 1.070
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
1.842 .619 5.480
N of Valid Cases 43
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Total
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara Normal
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Count 3 3 6
Expected Count 1.8 4.2 6.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
23.1% 10.0% 14.0%
% of Total 7.0% 7.0% 14.0%
Didampingi Count 10 27 37
Expected Count 11.2 25.8 37.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
76.9% 90.0% 86.0%
% of Total 23.3% 62.8% 86.0%
Total Count 13 30 43
Expected Count 13.0 30.0 43.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 30.2% 69.8% 100.0%
131
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.292a 1 .256
Continuity Correctionb .432 1 .511
Likelihood Ratio 1.204 1 .273
Fisher's Exact Test .345 .248
Linear-by-Linear
Association
1.262 1 .261
N of Valid Cases 43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh (Tidak
Didampingi / Didampingi)
2.700 .466 15.648
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
1.850 .709 4.829
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
.685 .301 1.562
N of Valid Cases 43
132
Lampiran 7. Kuesioner pola menonton televisi
DATA KARAKTERISTIK SUBJEK
No. Urut : ________ (diisi oleh peneliti)
Nama orangtua : ______________________________________________
Jenis kelamin : Laki-laki Perempuan
Nama anak : ______________________________________________
Jenis kelamin : Laki-laki Perempuan
Tanggal lahir : Tanggal ________ Bulan ________ Tahun ___________
Usia kehamilan saat melahirkan : ________________ minggu
Berat badan lahir : ________________ gram
Berat badan : ________________ kg (diisi peneliti)
Tinggi / panjang badan : ________________ cm (diisi peneliti)
Status gizi : ________________ (diisi peneliti)
Hasil pemeriksaan Capute scales : ________________ (diisi peneliti)
Riwayat gangguan perkembangan : Ya Tidak
Jika Ya, sebutkan : ____________________________
: ____________________________
Riwayat cacat bawaan : Ya Tidak
Riwayat kelainan saraf : Ya Tidak
Riwayat gangguan pendengaran : Ya Tidak
Riwayat cedera kepala / gegar otak : Ya Tidak
Riwayat opname (rawat inap) : Ya Tidak
Jika Ya :
Lama dirawat : ____________________________
Sebab dirawat : ____________________________
Diagnosa (informasi dari tenaga kesehatan) : ____________________________
Riwayat panas tinggi dan kejang : ____________________________
Riwayat menderita penyakit lain (sebutkan) : ______________________
Riwayat lamanya menderita sakit : < 1 bulan 1-3 bulan > 3 bulan
Apakah anak mempunyai saudara kembar : Ya Tidak
Jika Ya , Nama saudara kembaran : ____________________________
Hasil pemeriksaan Capute scales :_________________(diisi peneliti)
Bahasa yang digunakan orang tua untuk berbicara dengan anak (tuliskan)
:_______________________
Bahasa yang digunakan pengasuh di TPA/PAUD untuk berbicara dengan anak
:_______________________
133
Pendidikan terakhir ayah* : Tidak sekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3
Pendidikan terakhir ibu* : Tidak sekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3
Pekerjaan ayah : _________________________
Pekerjaan ibu : _________________________
Pekerjaan anggota keluarga lain (bila ada)** : _________________________
Pendapatan ayah : Pendapatan ibu :
a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan
b. Rp 1.000.000 – 3.000.000 / bulan b. Rp 1.000.000 – 3.000.000 / bulan
c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan
Pendapatan anggota keluarga lain (bila ada): a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan
b. Rp 1.000.000-3.000.000 / bulan
c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan
Jumlah tanggungan*** : __________________ orang
Pengasuh anak selain ayah dan ibu* : a. Pembantu/pengasuh/babysitter
b. Kakek/nenek/bibi/paman
c. Tetangga/orang lain
Pendidikan terakhir pengasuh*:Tidaksekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3
Biasanya anak diantar pada pukul ___ dan dijemput pada pukul ____ dari
TPA/PAUD
Anak berada di TPA/PAUD pada hari*:
Senin/Selasa/Rabu/Kamis/Jumat/Sabtu/minggu
Alamat rumah : _________________________________________
No. telp rumah : _________________________________________
No. HP : _________________________________________
Alamat tempat kerja : _________________________________________
No. telp tempat kerja : _________________________________________
Keterangan:
*lingkari yang benar
**anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah selain bapak dan ibu
***jumlah tanggungan adalah jumlah seluruh anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah
134
KUISIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN POLA MENONTON TELEVISI DENGAN
KETERLAMBATAN BICARA
Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
Nama anak : ___________________________________________________
TPA/PAUD : ___________________________________________________
Nama pengisi : ___________________________________________________
Jumlah televisi dalam rumah : _____
buah
a. 1 buah
b. ≥ 2 buah
Apakah terdapat televisi dalam kamar
tempat anak tidur?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Berapa lama anak menonton televisi
dalam satu hari pada hari sekolah?
a. < 1 jam
b. 1-2 jam
c. > 2 jam
Berapa lama anak menonton televisi
dalam satu hari pada hari libur?
a. < 1 jam
b. 1-2 jam
c. > 2 jam
Apakah anak selalu didampingi ketika
menonton televisi?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Usia pertama kali anak mulai menonton
televisi :
a. 0-24 bulan
b. > 24 bulan
Jika ya, dengan siapa anak paling sering
didampingi saat menonton televisi?
a. Orang tua
b. Pengasuh/pembantu/baby sitter
c. Kakek/nenek/paman/bibi
Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/
pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi?
a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi
dengan anak (hanya menonton
atau sambil mengerjakan
pekerjaan lain)
b. Menyuapi anak
c. Berinteraksi dengan anak
(mengajak anak berbicara,
menjelaskan, memilihkan
program dan bercerita tentang
program yang ditonton anak)
Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak :
a. Kesenian (musik, tarian,gambar)
b. Olahraga
c. Flora fauna
d. Sinetron
e. Kartun (sebutkan) _________
f. Kuis
g. Pendidikan
h. Lain-lain (sebutkan)________
135
BUKU HARIAN ANAK 1X24 JAM PADA HARI SEKOLAH
Hari, tanggal : __________ - -
Nama anak : _____________________________________________________
TPA/PAUD : _____________________________________________________
Nama pengisi : _____________________________________________________
Waktu
(Jam : Menit)
Kegiatan Anak Didampingi
Oleh
Keterangan
(jenis/judul tontonan)
Keterangan :
Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak
pada saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman /
bibi / teman / pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan
jenis/judul tayangan yang ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi.
136
BUKU HARIAN ANAK 1X24 JAM PADA HARI LIBUR
Hari, tanggal : __________ - -
Nama anak : ____________________________________________________
TPA/PAUD : _____________________________________________________
Nama pengisi : _____________________________________________________
Waktu
(Jam : Menit)
Kegiatan Anak Didampingi
Oleh
Keterangan
(jenis/judul tontonan)
Keterangan :
Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak pada
saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman / bibi / teman
/ pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan jenis/judul tayangan yang
ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi.
137
DATA KARAKTERISTIK TPA / PAUD
No. Urut : ________ (diisi oleh peneliti)
Nama TPA / PAUD : _______________________________________
Alamat : _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
Nama Kepala Sekolah : _______________________________________
Nama Guru / Pengasuh : _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
Nama pengisi : _______________________________________
Jumlah televisi di TPA / PAUD : _____
a. 1 buah
b. ≥ 2 buah
Apakah terdapat televisi dalam kamar
tempat anak tidur?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Berapa lama televisi dinyalakan dalam
satu hari?
a. < 1 jam
b. 1-2 jam
c. > 2 jam
Usia pertama kali anak mulai menonton
televisi :
a. 0-24 bulan
b. > 24 bulan
Apakah anak selalu didampingi ketika
menonton televisi?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/
pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi?
a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi
dengan anak (hanya menonton
atau sambil mengerjakan
pekerjaan lain)
b. Menyuapi anak
c. Berinteraksi dengan anak
(mengajak anak berbicara,
menjelaskan, memilihkan
program dan bercerita tentang
isi program yang ditonton anak
Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak :
a. Kesenian (musik, tarian,
gambar)
b. Olahraga
c. Flora fauna
d. Sinetron
e. Kartun (sebutkan) ___________
f. Kuis
g. Pendidikan
h. Lain-lain (sebutkan) _________
144
Lampiran 10. Biodata mahasiswa
Identitas
Nama : Ani Safitri
NIM : G2A009074
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Gogodalem Semarang, 7 November 1990
Jenis kelamin : Perempuan
Alamat : Dusun Mulya Jaya RT 005 RW 003
Desa Sei Bawang Kec. Singingi Kab. Kuantan Singing
Riau
Nomor Telepon : -
Nomor HP : 085641196888
e-mail : [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD : SD Negeri 030 Singingi Lulus tahun: 2002
2. SMP : SMP Negeri 1 Kuantan Singingi Lulus tahun: 2005
3. SMA : SMA Negeri 1 Kuantan Singingi Lulus tahun: 2008
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2009
Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. (Belum ada)
Pengalaman penelitian
1. (Belum ada)
Pengalaman publikasi tulisan ilmiah
1. (Belum ada)