1
Evaluation of radioactivity decontamination from different materials for surfaces of a generally purpose radioisotope laboratory Radioisotope Laboratory, Physics Department, School of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected]. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction 2. Methods 2. Methods 4. Discussion & Conclusions 4. Discussion & Conclusions The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of radioactive decontamination effectiveness of radioactive decontamination of commonly used materials employed for laboratory surfaces. In addition we also evaluated how solvent spills can modify it. 99 99 Mo/ Mo/ 99m 99m Tc Tc Generator Generator (a) Initial Activity Initial Activity was measured in a dose calibrator dose calibrator (b) The three surfaces were contaminated contaminated (c) (c) Decontamination Decontamination with cotton pieces rinsed with water and neutral commercial cleaning agent (d) Removed activity was measured in a SSC SSC (solid scintillantion counter) using a 99m 99m Tc standard Tc standard (e) %RA= %RA= Removed activity Removed activity Inicial activity Inicial activity The same procedure was repeated with samples of the surfaces previously treated with: acetone, methyl-ethyl-cetone (MEK), ethanol (EtOH) and methanol (MeOH). Dupont®Corian® Mipolam 300 3. Results 3. Results Dupont®Corian® is better decontaminated than the other surfaces because it has the highest %RA. Mipolam 300 has a higher %RA after being treated with acetone or MEK. Mipolam 300 Mipolam 300 has a higher %RA after being treated with acetone or MEK. The %RA decreases when Dupont®Corian® is treated using solvents with the exception of MEK that increases it. The %RA decreases when Dupont Dupont®Corian Corian® is treated using solvents with the exception of MEK that increases it. How effective decontamination is? How effective decontamination is? According to these preliminary results Dupont®Corian® is the most suitable surface for stands of a generally purpose radioisotope laboratory that uses different solvents since it is better decontaminated with standard cleaning agents. Further research is needed to compare Mipolam 300 with other material surfaces suitable for laboratory floors and to evaluate other working simulated conditions as well. Stainless steel Stainless steel Dupont Dupont®Corian Corian® Mipolam 300 Mipolam 300 Borr Borré C, Tes C, Tesán F, Leonardi N, Rivera E, Zubillaga M, Salgueiro MJ n F, Leonardi N, Rivera E, Zubillaga M, Salgueiro MJ %RA was calculated (f) Gabriela Martin, phD

3. Results - IRPA · Borré C, Tesán F, Leonardi N, Rivera E, Zubillaga M, Salgueiro MJ %RA was calculated (f) Gabriela Martin, phD. Title: Diapositiva 1 Author: Fiorella Created

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Evaluation of radioactivity decontamination from different materials for surfaces of a

    generally purpose radioisotope laboratory

    Radioisotope Laboratory, Physics Department, School of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected].

    1. Introduction1. Introduction

    2. Methods2. Methods

    4. Discussion & Conclusions4. Discussion & Conclusions

    The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of radioactive decontaminationeffectiveness of radioactive decontamination of commonly used materials employed for laboratory surfaces. In addition we also evaluated how solvent spills can modify it.

    9999Mo/Mo/99m99mTc Tc Generator Generator (a)

    Initial ActivityInitial Activitywas measured in a dose calibrator dose calibrator

    (b)

    The three surfaces were contaminated contaminated (c)(c)

    DecontaminationDecontamination with cotton pieces rinsed with water and neutral commercial cleaning agent (d)

    Removed activity was measured in a SSC SSC (solid scintillantion counter)

    using a 99m99mTc standard Tc standard (e)

    %RA=%RA=Removed activityRemoved activity

    Inicial activityInicial activity

    The same procedure was repeated with samples of the surfaces previously treated with: acetone, methyl-ethyl-cetone (MEK), ethanol (EtOH) and methanol (MeOH).

    Dupont®Corian®

    Mipolam 3003. Results3. Results

    Dupont®Corian® is better decontaminated than the other surfaces because it has the highest

    %RA.

    Dupont®Corian® is better decontaminated than the other surfaces because it has the highest

    %RA.

    Mipolam 300 has a higher %RA after being treated with acetone or MEK.

    Mipolam 300 Mipolam 300 has a higher %RA after being treated with acetone or MEK.

    The %RA decreases when Dupont®Corian® is treated using solvents with the exception of MEK that

    increases it.

    The %RA decreases when DupontDupont®®CorianCorian®® is treated using solvents with the exception of MEK that

    increases it.

    How effective decontamination is?How effective decontamination is?

    According to these preliminary results Dupont®Corian® is the most suitable surface for stands of a generally purpose radioisotope laboratory that uses different solvents since it is better decontaminated with standard cleaning agents. Further research is needed to compare Mipolam 300 with other material surfaces suitable for laboratory floors and to evaluate other working simulated conditions as well.

    Stainless steelStainless steel

    DupontDupont®®CorianCorian®®

    Mipolam 300Mipolam 300

    BorrBorréé C, TesC, Tesáán F, Leonardi N, Rivera E, Zubillaga M, Salgueiro MJn F, Leonardi N, Rivera E, Zubillaga M, Salgueiro MJ

    %RA was calculated (f)

    Gabriela Martin, phD