2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Las Colinas

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Las Colinas

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-2011-campus-improvement-plan-las-colinas 1/11

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011Campus Plans

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Las Colinas Elementary

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

Abby McCone, Principal

Vision Statement:Las Colinas Elementary is dedicated to preparing students to become compassionate, critical

thinkers, and life – long learners who are responsible, global citizens that are helping to create abetter and more peaceful world.



Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served SignatureBen Kneupper Math IF 3

Rachel Langston IB Coordinator 3

Michelle Martinez ESL IF 4

Annissa Mitchell Counselor 6

Abby McCone Principal 0

Stephanie Flores Special Education Teacher 0Esther Gonzalez Activity Teacher 1

Diana Dunn Kindergarten Teacher 0

Marlana Dumas 1st Grade Teacher 0

Stephanie Ariens 2nd Grade Teacher 0

Erin Gibson 3rd Grade Teacher 0

Sandy Flores 4th Grade Teacher 0

Katie Cannon 5th

Grade Teacher 0Natasha Grider Librarian/Parent 2

Michelle Howard Activity Teachers 0

Wendi Greenwood Parent 0

Liz Ortiz Parent 0Stephanie Courtney Parent 0Ranika Klipsch Parent 0Katie Myers Parent 0




3

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.




4

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted (TA)Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools

TS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students’ difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services




5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments

D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified TeachersG. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)




6

RESULTS

GOALShould identifywhat is desired

in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

result of, puttingnew processes

in place orimproving

existingprocesses.

SMARTGOAL

Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

based, andTime-bound.

INDICATORStandards and

objectives (weak areasfor students)

MEASURESTools we’ll use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

are improving.

TARGETSThe attainable

performance level wewould like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of commitment.

- Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline (1990)

Improvestudent

performanceon MathTAKS.

By the end

of the 2010-2011 schoolyears, atleast 92% ofall sub-populationsin grades 3,4, 5 willmeet or

exceed thestandard forpassingTAKS Math.

TAKS Math Test

End of UnitAssessment

End of UnitPerformanceTask

UniversalScreener

90% of all sub-populations in

grades 3, 4, 5 will meet orexceed the standard forpassing TAKS Math.

90% of all students tested willattain a scores of 70% orhigher.

90% of students tested willmeet the standard on theperformance tasks.

Universal Screening – 90% ofALL students tested will attaina score of 70 or higher.

3rd

Grade TAKS Math 2010

Sub Pop ScoreAll 96.1

A 100AA 81.3

H 100W 100

ED 90LEP 100

SpEd *

4th

Grade TAKS Math 2010

Sub Pop ScoreAll 95.2

A 100

AA 88.9H 84.6W 100

ED 77.8LEP 100

SpEd 90.9

5th

Grade TAKS Math 2010Sub Pop ScoreAll 98.1

A 100

AA 87.5H 100

W 100ED 100LEP *

SpEd 100

SMART GOALS (Example)90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Reading

Obj. 1 – Basic Understanding85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS MathObj. 1 – Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning Obj. 6 – Mathematical Processes and Tools




7

Las Colinas ElementaryCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA

2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special Ed

Economically

Disadvantaged LEPINDICATOR

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 95.2 98 87.5 92 93.1 95 97.2 98 84.2 92 88.6 92 95.0 98

Mathematics 96.4 98 84.8 92 93.1 95 100 100 90.0 92 88.9 92 100 100

Writing 95.1 98 77.8 92 100 100 95.7 98 80.0 92 87.5 92 100 100

Science 90.495

75.092

66.792

95.898

50.092

75.092

*100

Social Studies

All Tests

Graduation 2009

Graduation 2010 Goal

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Participation: Math 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Attendance 96.8 98 96.4 98 95.8 98 97.1 98 97 98 96.2 98 97.3 98




8


Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus State

Diff.

fromstate

2011Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

33.8 35 1.2 36 57.1 25 32.1 60 27.1 28 .9 35 44.7 48 3.3 50

Mathematics 51.9 37 14.9 52 50.0 23 27 55 39.5 31 8.5 45 78.9 47 31.9 80

Writing 28.6 30 1.4 35 * 21 * 30 22.6 25 2.4 30 36.8 38 1.2 40

Science 71.1 44 27.1 75 * 28 * 35 63.9 36 27.9 70 100.0 59 41 100

Social Studies

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-pus

StateDiff.fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.fromstate

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.fromstate

2011Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

0.0 17 17 25 28.0 26 2 32 15.6 23 7.4 25

Mathematics 31.3 17 14.3 35 44.1 28 16.1 48 21.2 25 3.8 25

Writing 16.7 11 5.7 25 23.1 22 1.1 28 12.5 20 7.5 25

Science 60.0 24 36 65 62.5 33 29.5 65 66.7 20 46.7 70

Social Studies




9


2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievementCampus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureAt least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS math D, E

At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS reading D, E

At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS writing D, E

At least 92% passing standard for all sub groups on TAKS science D, E

Improve student achievement

10% increase in all commended scores F

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff Campus Focus # 2 Criteria for Success Performance Measure

5% reduction in bullying reports AImprove school climate

2% increase in attendance C

District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessCampus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureImprove use of Technology 100% of Kindergarten teachers will use iPADs with students for differentiated

instructionJ

District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school

systemCampus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance Measure

25% increase in African American volunteers A, B, CIncrease parental confidence

Increase parental approval of academics on annual survey by 10% A, B






11

Documents

2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Las Colinas