2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    1/33

    Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Developmentfor Transportation and Stationary

    Applications:Latest Update on Stack and System

    Performance

    Steven ShafferDelphi Chief Engineer Fuel Cells

    2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    November 17, 2009

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    2/33

    November 17, 2009 2

    Delphi Solid Oxide Fuel CellsMarket Opportunities

    Clean Coal Power Plant

    Advanced Power SystemsMilitary

    Auxiliary & Mobile Power Units

    Residential Power

    Stationary CHP Power Units

    Recreational Vehicles

    Auxiliary Power Units

    Heavy Duty Trucks

    Auxiliary Power Units

    Delphi Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Provide: Ultra-clean, near zero emissions High-quality, reliable power

    High fuel efficiency

    Fuel flexibility

    Low noise

    Commercial Power

    Stationary Power Units

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    3/33

    November 17, 2009 3

    Delphi SOFC Development Centers

    Fenton, Michigan Cell Development

    Manufacturing Development

    Electrochemical Testing

    Material Characterization and Analysis

    Rochester, New York Stack Development

    System Development

    Reformer Development

    BOP Development

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    4/33

    November 17, 2009 4

    Cell and Stack Development

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    5/33

    November 17, 2009 5

    Equipment for Cell Development and Fabrication

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    6/33

    November 17, 2009 6

    Typical Gen 3 30-Cell Stack Performance

    MG735C676 - 30plus3 Date: 1/29/2009

    Fuel: 48.5%H2-48.5%N2-3%H20 Flows: 89.8(A), 151(C)

    Stack Voltage and Power Density for Polarization Test

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

    Current (Amps)

    StackVoltage(V)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    PowerDensity(mW/cm2)

    Stack Voltage (V) Power Density (mW/cm 2) Poly. (Stack Voltage (V)) Poly. (Power Density (mW/cm 2))

    Power: 1.53 kW (486 mW/cm2) @ 60A (570 mA per cm2), 25.5 V(0.85V / cell avg), fuel 48.5% H2 ,3% H2O, rest N2, 750 800oC

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    7/33November 17, 2009 7

    Generation 3 30-Cell Stack

    Minimal lowering of power density ( 5%) in going from 50% fuel utilization to80% fuel utilization

    Stack Voltage and Power Density for Utilization Test

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    47 52 57 62 67 72 77 82

    Utilization (%)

    S

    tackPowerDensity

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    8/33November 17, 2009 8

    Cathode Stability (at Carnegie Mellon University)

    Powder

    5-cell stack (#530) tested 3500+ hrs at 0.8 V/cell

    on 28%H2 30%CO 6%H2O 2.5 ppmv S

    FabricatedCell

    Bulk Cathode Composition via TEM

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    La Sr La/Sr Fe Co Fe/Co A/B

    Atomic%

    Powder

    Fabricated Cells

    530 inlet ROI 1

    530 inlet ROI 2530 Outlet ROI 4

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    9/33November 17, 2009 9

    Gen 3 5-Cell Stack Maximum Power

    MG735C793 Date: 6/23/2009

    Fuel: 48.5%H2-48.5%N2-3%H20

    Stack Voltage and Power Density for Polarization Test

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Current (Amps)

    StackVoltage(V)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    PowerD

    ensity(mW/cm2)

    Produced 500 mW/cm2 @ 60A (570 mA per cm2), 0.87V / cell avg,

    fuel 48.5% H2 ,3% H2O, rest N2, 750 800oC Max Power density: 765 mW/cm2 @ 100 Amps (952 mA per cm2),

    0.80V / cell avg, fuel 48.5% H2, 3% H2O, rest N2, 750 825oC

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    10/33November 17, 2009 10

    Interconnect Development Materials & Coatings

    MG735C624

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    1.2

    0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00

    Time Hrs

    Voltage(Volts)

    Base material is ferritic stainless steel alloy

    Multiple coatings under evaluation Low cost, conventionally processed coating demonstrated good stability in stack test

    Graph shows typical repeating unit performance in a stack with coating tested for durability(Fuel = 48.5 % H2, 3% H2O, rest N2, constant current of 570 mA per cm2)

    Further development is ongoing

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    11/33November 17, 2009 11

    Gen 3 Stack Durability with Diesel Reformate

    MG735C727

    Fuel: Reformed Diesel

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    11.1

    1.2

    0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00

    Time Hrs

    A

    verageVoltage(V)

    10-cell Gen 3 stack on Diesel reformate (24%H2 25% CO 5% CO2 7%H2O Bal N2) at 35 amps and 750C

    Initial voltage drop observed in the first 200 hours due to sulfur

    Minimal degradation in the last 1300 hours

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    12/33November 17, 2009 12

    Gen 3 30-Cell Stack - Thermal Cycling

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00

    Time Hrs

    Temperature(DegC)

    Gen 3 30-cell stack being thermal cycled 10 hour cycle from 50oC to operating temperature to 50oC Performance evaluated at each thermal cycle

    Constant current load of 30 Amps at operating temperature

    Fuel of 48.5% H2, 3% H2O, rest N2

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    13/33November 17, 2009 13

    30-Cell Stack Thermal Cycling Results

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210

    Thermal Cycle Number

    MeanCellVoltage

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    14/33November 17, 200914

    Red XProblem Solving Tools For Stack Issues

    Red X is a registered term of Shainin LLC

    Cell Voltage by Stack at 60amps

    0.50

    0.55

    0.60

    0.65

    0.70

    0.75

    0.80

    0.85

    653

    657

    651

    658

    659

    660

    661

    665

    671

    672

    662

    666

    680

    681

    683

    684

    690

    691

    Stack

    CellVoltage

    Average

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.50

    0.60

    0.704/10/2008

    4/12/2008

    4/14/2008

    4/15/2008

    4/17/2008

    4/24/2008

    4/29/2008

    5/29/2008

    6/6/2008

    6/13/2008

    6/24/2008

    6/26/2008

    7/22/2008

    7/23/2008

    7/24/2008

    7/25/2008

    7/31/2008

    7/31/2008

    Build Date

    CellVoltage

    Range

    Average

    Range

    Did not meetvoltage

    range specs

    Problem solving tools like Red Xare being utilized in stack manufacturing

    Lessons learned are being implemented for Gen 4 stack design andmanufacturing

    Example: Find & eliminate the Red Xdriving high cell voltage range

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    15/33November 17, 2009 15

    Stack Other Area

    High cellvoltagerange

    OtherPerformance

    Characteristics

    Event Defect

    First time qualityissue: IV

    performance

    Durability issue

    Feature

    Repeating unit torepeating unit

    Other strategies

    P = 0.14V M = 0.013V

    Components Assembly Process

    CassetteCell Cathode

    Interconnect

    Paste Interconnect Component

    CoatingContamination

    Other

    Red XProblem Definition TreeTM

    Problem Definition TreeTM is a registered trademark of Shainin LLC

    Red X was identified as contaminationin the interconnect coating from aspecific supplier

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    16/33November 17, 2009 16

    Gen 4 Cell Development for Coal Based Systems

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    17/33November 17, 2009 17

    Gen 4 Stack Design for Coal Based Systems

    Gen 3 stack

    About 4x active area of Gen3Lower cost interconnects/coatings than Gen3High volume production processes5 kW core building blocks

    Gen 4 stack

    Delphi is developing its Generation 4 stack as the module formeeting stationary and transportation application requirements

    Key stack features are: Laser welded cassette repeating unit configuration

    Stamped metallic cassette components

    Stamped interconnects Low cost coatings

    Low cost, conventionally processed balance of stack components

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    18/33November 17, 2009 18

    Gen 4 Stack Development Status

    Laser welding of SOFC parts

    Gen 4 stack design is complete

    Process development and optimization ongoing to fabricate cells,cassettes, and stacks

    First 5-cell stack fabricated and tested

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    19/33November 17, 2009 19

    Gen 4 Stack Performance : 5-cell stack

    Achieved power density of 474 mW/cm2

    @ 240A (590 mA per cm2

    ), 0.80V /cell average, fuel 48.5% H2 ,3% H2O, rest N2, 700 800oC

    MG735G001-5cell stack Date: 8/26/2009

    Fuel: 48.5%H2-48.5%N2-3%H20

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250

    Current (Amps)

    StackVoltage(V)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    P

    owerDensity(mW/cm2)

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    20/33

    November 17, 2009 20

    System Development

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    21/33

    November 17, 2009 21

    Balance of Plant Components:High Temperature Insulation

    InsulationCollars

    Old

    New

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    22/33

    November 17, 2009 22

    Balance of Plant Components

    Process Air Delivery System Anode Tailgas Recycle Pump

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    23/33

    November 17, 2009 23

    Diesel Fuel Survey ResultsSummer 2007 Sulfur Levels

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

    ppm

    frequency

    Sulfur ppm

    Source: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (US andCanada, 160 samples)

    Current 2007 ULSD Spec.

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    24/33

    November 17, 2009 24

    Delphi Solid Oxide Fuel CellsHot Reformate De-Sulfurization

    Hot Reformate De-Sulfurization Development

    Remove H2S to levels below 10 ppbv (parts per billion volume) from an input of2.5 ppmv (parts per million volume)

    Sulfur acts as a poison to SOFC

    Maximize operation time between sorbent exchanges

    Minimize device volume and operation pressure drop

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    25/33

    November 17, 2009 25

    Delphi Solid Oxide Fuel CellsHot Reformate De-Sulfurization

    A non-regenerating sorbent has been selected that: Meets maximum 10 ppbv output

    Meets operating temperature requirements

    Capacity is such that a bed operates for at least 6 months prior to requiring bedexchange for the 95th percentile driver

    System pressure drop requirements were met at full system reformate flow

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    26/33

    November 17, 2009 26

    Delphi Solid Oxide Fuel CellDesign of New Diesel APU Platform

    Endothermic Diesel Reformer withintegrated burner

    Gen 4 SOFC Stack

    Highlyintegrated

    manifold andheat exchanger

    assembly

    Fuel and Air SupplySystems

    DPS 3000D3 kW net output power

    Desulfurizer

    Electronics and Controls

    Module

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    27/33

    November 17, 2009 2727

    Projected Performance Comparison

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    28/33

    November 17, 2009 28

    DPS3000 D Initial Builds

    First design engineeredspecifically as a truck APU

    Internal desulfurizer forULSD

    ULSD cold-start capable

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    29/33

    November 17, 2009 29

    Model 386 Peterbilt vehicle received atTCR on 8/28/09

    Vehicle provided to Delphi as part of DOEEERE Truck APU Demo project

    Vehicle prepped for SOFC APU

    Fuel and electrical interface

    Mounting Hardware for APUenclosure

    AC inverter

    Refrigerator

    Peterbilt Development Truck

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    30/33

    November 17, 2009 3030

    Test to Failure using Step Over Stress strategy to assess stack reliability

    Mil Std 810G Method 514.6 Annex C, Truck and Transportation Over US Highways Ambient temperature random vibration in 3 distinct axes

    Performance evaluated after each axis of testing

    Successfully completed 3.75 million miles equiv. of vibration

    Delphi Solid Oxide Fuel CellGen 3 30-Cell Stack Vibration Testing

    Vertical

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    31/33

    November 17, 2009 31

    Systems Vibration Testing

    DPS 3000D SOFC System on shaker table

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    32/33

    November 17, 2009 32

    Delphi SOFC APU Recent Accomplishments

    Delphi/Peterbilt Awarded DOE Program for a 1 year vehicledemonstration

    Stack durability testing 200 Thermal Cycles

    Completed 5 lives accelerated vibration testing

    Engineered and Built First Truck APU Designed to operate on Diesel

    Integrated Desulfurizer operational

    First APU installed on Peterbilt Truck Operational by December 2009

  • 8/3/2019 2009 Fuel Cell Seminar

    33/33

    Acknowledgements

    http://www.utcpower.com/http://www.netl.doe.gov/main.htmlhttp://www.ch.doe.gov/insidech/org_offices/fao/doelogo.gif