Upload
1977jul
View
230
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
1/18
1
Warm up
2
Production and Storage of solid alternative fuels for
substitution rates of over 30% in the Cement industrypresented by Peter Windmoeller
Agenda
background of the company VECOPLAN and the speaker
example 15t/hr substitution, detail
example MSW, conceptual example wood, conceptual
questions
35 slides total, Test after slide 23, please keep pen and paper ready.
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
2/18
3
Turnover
3
in Mio.
Export quota: ~ 70%
4
Employees
4
Stable growth
Focus on education: 37 apprentices in 2008(Germany)
32 8 Anges tellte28 Aus zubildende
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
3/18
5
Markets
Vecoplan AG and its affiliated companies
develop, produce and market machinery and
plants for the processing of
_ wood and biomass
_ plastics,
_ paper,
_ municipal and industrial waste,
_ specialty materials.
Vecoplans products and solutions are able to
cover the whole recycling process of these and
other materials.
5
6
Products and services
6
Single shaft shredders Double shaft shredders Chippers
Conveying technology Screening technology Separation technology
Sorting technology (intelligent) Storage sytems Full in house engineering
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
4/18
7
Constant R&D
7
HiTorc - Drive VAZ - Shredder
Film and fiber rotor Flipper
Patent Pa
tent
Paten
t
8
Clients (partial)
8
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
5/18
9
background of the speaker
As independent representative:
VECOPLAN cement industry
UniGear, specialty gears and gear box repairs
As partner in LOGEQUIP:
AirStream, fan upgrades
Darimec, girth gears
unitherm, burners
Iteca, process control
other
10
example Ciment Quebec
processing on site
Customer: Cement plant, 1000000t/a, dry process
Status: in operation since August 2009
Capacity: over 20t/hr
dry insustrial waste
majority autofluff
Addition for
preparation and
storage of
alternative fuels
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
6/18
11
Concept (not final layout)
12
Receiving and preshredding
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
7/18
13
Preshredder
Waste 0 - >1500 mm
Waste 0 200 (250) mm
Reality check:
Walking
floorunloading
manual
feed
opening
Door to
rotor open
Discharge
withcleaning
cvoneyor
14
FE separation and screening
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
8/18
15
FE separation and Screening
FE Parts
< 50 (60) mm 50 (60) 120 mm
120 -200 mm
Reality check:Coveredscreen
area
Discharge
small
fraction
Collecting
conveyor
to storage
system
Discharge
large
fraction
16
Density separation
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
9/18
17
Density separation
Light fraction Heavy fraction
Reality check:
Discharge
to
vibrating
Vibrating
to belt
Heavy
discharge
18
Reshredding
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
10/18
19
Reshredding
RDF fuel tostorrage
Reality check:
2 reshredders
Collecting
conveyor
to storage
system
20
Storage
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
11/18
21
Not just storage but intelligent storage!
Input: sorting into different fuel qualities
Output: blending into a most possible consistent quality,
managed by kiln control operators.
low mediumhigh
Reality check:
2 infeed
conveyor
Fuel in
storage
system
Discharge
system
22
What does this mean from the viewpoint
of the control room? (assuming 35% substitution rate)
BTUPVC
Coal fraction (65%)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COAL high quality medium quality low quality BLENDED
low quality
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COAL high quality medium quality low quality BLENDED
medium quality
0
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COAL high quality medium quality low quality BLENDED
high qual i ty
0
1
2
3
4
56
7
8
9
10
time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COAL high quality medium quality low quality BLENDED
Coal / RDF blend
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COAL high quality medium quality low quality BLENDED
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
12/18
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
13/18
25
example MSW
green field layout
processed off site by separate entity
only receiving and storage at the cement plant
Customer: JV in North America
Status: quote on hold
Capacity: 60t/hr at MSW processing
expected yield (dry, light, high BTU): 20%
26
Material preparation, first location = landfill
60t/hr
20t/hr
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
14/18
27
Receiving and storage, second location = cement plant
28
example wood
integration in existing plant layout
receiving of preshredded green wood
screening and processing on site
drying by others
Customer: cement plant in North America
Status: project to be downsized due to EPA
Capacities: 15t/hr out of the dryer (24/7)
receiving 120t/hr
3 day on site storage of green chips
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
15/18
29
Receiving, storage and processing(integrate into existing plant layout)
Vecobelt
Rail track
30
Vecobelt
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
16/18
31
Vecobelt, 155 m (about 450)
eliminate obstacles
on the gound
Extend Veco belt
into tower,
eleiminate towerextensioins
32
It is realistic??? (2008 figures)
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
Germ
any
Switz
erla
nd
Austria
Norw
ay
Fran
ce
Belgiu
m
Swed
en
Luxe
mbo
urg
CzechRep
ublic
Japa
nUS
A
Cana
da
Australia UK
Denm
ark
Hung
ary
Finlan
dIta
ly
Spain
Pola
nd
RecentpatterninuseofRDF
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
17/18
33
Does it pay???
1t/hr coal replacement
* 7500hrs/year operation
= 7500t/year coal replacement
* 20USD/t cost advantage over fossil fuel
= 150000USD/year fuel cost reduction per ton replaced
Alternative fuel projects strongly benefit from economies of scale
Bigger is better regarding
1. Economics, payback
2. Project management, very limited technological risk
3. Process control / operations, constant part of fuel mix
That depends (please use your own numbers)
Other considerations:Gate fees for HazMat
Carbon tax
Sustainability
34
What do the neighbours say???
Lafarge, Woessingen, Germany: target 2009 : 100% subsittution rate =>
(85% more realistic)
Negative fuel costs
Germany has an
average population
density which is higher
than in most regions in
the US
The Green Party
is a constant part of
the federal and
regional parliaments
since over 20 years
8/13/2019 16. Peter Windmoller VECOPLAN paper FICEM APCAC 2010 v 100830
18/18
35
Thank you for your attention
please quietly wake your neighbour
Questions welcome!
Come and see us
At booth # 7
Peter Windmoeller
+1 514 887 7172