20
Biotechnology for the production of essential oils, flavours and volatile isolates. A review. †,‡ Y. Gounaris* ABSTRACT: Various applications of biotechnological methods for the production of volatile compounds useful to the food and pharmaceutical industries are discussed. The yields obtained from intact or genetically modified plants are compared to those achieved by microbial methods. Plant yields are too low for the products to compete commercially to those synthesized chemically. Still lower yields are obtained with in vitro-cultured plant tissues. Trangenic plants with altered methylerythritol path gave 50% more essential oil in the best case. The 100-fold increases in shikimate-derived volatiles, obtained with over- expressed alcohol dehydrogenase and five-fold more C6 volatle aldehydes and 2-phenylethanol, were produced with overex- pressed lipoxygenase and 2-phenylethanol dehydrogenase, respectively. However, the most spectacular yields were observed with biotransformations catalysed by microorganisms. Kluyveromyces marxianus, produces over 26 g/l 2-phenylethanol from phenyalanine, whereas Candida sorbophila, Mucor circillenoides or Yarrowia lipolytica can produce 5–40 g/l g-decalactone from ricinoleic acid. Vanillin production from ferulic acid is in the range 12–60 g/l with Amycolatopsis and Streptomyces species. Vanillin can be produced at 5 g/l by Escherichia coli and amorphadiene yields of 37 g/l have been observed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, both with the genetically overexpressed methyl–erythritol path. Genetically engineered b-oxidation genes result in yields of 10 g/l g-decalactone byYarrowia lipolytica and up to 80 g/l dicaboxylic acids by various yeasts. These results far exceed the theoretical limit of about 1 g/l required for consideration of a procedure as a commercially interesting process, alternative to chemical sythesis. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Keywords: bioreactor; biotechnology; essential oil; terpenoids; volatiles Introduction There are hundreds of thousands of different secondary metabo- lites produced by plants, four times more than the number pro- duced by microorganisms. This number is estimated to represent only 10% of the secondary metabolites existing in plants and still waiting to be isolated and identified. Of these, terpenoids com- prise the largest and structurally most varied class, numbering over 40 000 different molecules. Members of the 10-carbon ter- penoids, the monoterpenoids, are constituents of essential oils produced by plants. The essential oil monoterpenoids are vola- tile, which means that they pass in to the air in sufficient concen- trations to be detected by, and to act on, other organisms. Essential oils can also contain sesquiterpenoids, phenypro- panoids and benzenoids. In addition, plant tissues can produce volatile aldehydes and their corresponding alcohols, and acids as well as volatile ketones. These compounds are occasionally found in essential oils, but are usually formed in specific plant tissues and under specific physiological conditions that favour catabolic reactions. They can be considered as belonging to the primary metabolism, although they can have useful fragrance, flavour or medicinal qualities. The commercial interest on volatiles stems from their aro- matic and flavour qualities. Several of them, have significant antimicrobial and antineoplastic activity. Others act as messen- gers in communication between plants themselves or with other organisms. Volatiles are obtained from plants by distilla- tion at or by extraction with ethanol, diethyl ether, chloroform, pentane, hexane, benzene or other organic solvents. Unfortu- nately, volatiles, like most secondary metabolites, are present in plant tissues in limited quantities. Plant seeds, flowers, stems and roots usually contain 0.1–10% v/w fresh weight essential oil and often <0.1%. Cases of up to 20% v/w or even higher essen- tial oil concentrations in plant tissues are also known. Even so, a single compound can constitute 40–90% of the oil and usually is not the most useful one. The most desirable volatiles are often present in the essential oil at concentrations <10% and even less than 1%. Considering that in most cases the essential oil is produced in only specific plant tissues, such as seeds or flowers, whose total mass in a single harvesting season is a small weight percentage of the whole plant, it is obvious why obtaining useful volatiles from cultivated plants can be an expensive operation. Chemical manufacture of small organics, such as the majority of plant volatiles, is often cheaper, so that the natural product occupies a small percentage of the market. An example is vanillin, nine-tenths of whose market involves the synthetic product. [1] A factor determining the share market of the ‘natural’ * Correspondence to: Y. Gounaris, 10 Stoimenidou Street, 62045 Alistrati, Greece. E-mail: [email protected] This article is part of the Special Issue of Flavour and Fragrance Journal entitled, Aromatic Plants, Spices and Volatiles in Food and Beverages™, edited by Ana Cristina Figueiredo and M. Graça Miguel University of Thessaly, Department of Agriculture, Fytokou Street, 38446 New Ionia, Magnesia, Greece This article was published online on 12 May 2010. The funding information in this footnote has been removed. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected 28 May 2010 Review Received: 27 March 2010; Accepted: 27 March 2010; Published online in Wiley Online Library: 12 May 2010 (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI 10.1002/ffj.1996 367 Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 367–386 Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

12 90 Flavors

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

flavor

Citation preview

  • Biotechnology for the production of essentialoils, avours and volatile isolates. A review.,

    Y. Gounaris*

    ABSTRACT: Various applications of biotechnologicalmethods for the production of volatile compounds useful to the food andpharmaceutical industries are discussed. The yields obtained from intact or genetically modied plants are compared to thoseachieved by microbial methods. Plant yields are too low for the products to compete commercially to those synthesizedchemically. Still lower yields are obtained with in vitro-cultured plant tissues. Trangenic plants with altered methylerythritolpath gave 50% more essential oil in the best case. The 100-fold increases in shikimate-derived volatiles, obtained with over-expressed alcohol dehydrogenase and ve-fold more C6 volatle aldehydes and 2-phenylethanol, were produced with overex-pressed lipoxygenase and 2-phenylethanol dehydrogenase, respectively. However, themost spectacular yields were observedwith biotransformations catalysed by microorganisms. Kluyveromyces marxianus, produces over 26 g/l 2-phenylethanol fromphenyalanine, whereas Candida sorbophila, Mucor circillenoides or Yarrowia lipolytica can produce 540 g/l g-decalactone fromricinoleic acid. Vanillin production from ferulic acid is in the range 1260 g/l with Amycolatopsis and Streptomyces species.Vanillin can be produced at 5 g/l by Escherichia coli and amorphadiene yields of 37 g/l have been observedwith Saccharomycescerevisiae, bothwith the genetically overexpressedmethylerythritol path. Genetically engineered b-oxidation genes result inyields of 10 g/l g-decalactone byYarrowia lipolytica and up to 80 g/l dicaboxylic acids by various yeasts. These results far exceedthe theoretical limit of about 1 g/l required for consideration of a procedure as a commercially interesting process, alternativeto chemical sythesis. Copyright 2010 JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Keywords: bioreactor; biotechnology; essential oil; terpenoids; volatiles

    IntroductionThere are hundreds of thousands of dierent secondary metabo-lites produced by plants, four times more than the number pro-duced by microorganisms. This number is estimated to representonly 10% of the secondary metabolites existing in plants and stillwaiting to be isolated and identied. Of these, terpenoids com-prise the largest and structurally most varied class, numberingover 40 000 dierent molecules. Members of the 10-carbon ter-penoids, the monoterpenoids, are constituents of essential oilsproduced by plants. The essential oil monoterpenoids are vola-tile, which means that they pass in to the air in sucient concen-trations to be detected by, and to act on, other organisms.Essential oils can also contain sesquiterpenoids, phenypro-panoids and benzenoids. In addition, plant tissues can producevolatile aldehydes and their corresponding alcohols, and acids aswell as volatile ketones. These compounds are occasionally foundin essential oils, but are usually formed in specic plant tissuesand under specic physiological conditions that favour catabolicreactions. They can be considered as belonging to the primarymetabolism, although they can have useful fragrance, avour ormedicinal qualities.

    The commercial interest on volatiles stems from their aro-matic and avour qualities. Several of them, have signicantantimicrobial and antineoplastic activity. Others act as messen-gers in communication between plants themselves or withother organisms. Volatiles are obtained from plants by distilla-tion at or by extraction with ethanol, diethyl ether, chloroform,pentane, hexane, benzene or other organic solvents. Unfortu-nately, volatiles, like most secondary metabolites, are present in

    plant tissues in limited quantities. Plant seeds, owers, stemsand roots usually contain 0.110% v/w fresh weight essential oiland often

  • product compared to that of the synthetic is the recentpreference of consumers for it, partially stemming from thebelief that it is free from traces of harmful manufacturing arte-facts and left-overs. Also, the chemical synthesis often results inracemic mixtures of the product, giving an approximation onlyof the natural avour qualities. There is a need to reduce thecost of the natural product, so it becomes available to a widerrange of consumers. From an environmental aspect, the produc-tion of useful volatiles by non-chemical environmentallyfriendly methods is always a preferred and often necessaryalternative.

    Biotechnology attempts to facilitate the production, andtherefore to reduce the market cost, of natural volatiles byemploying a variety of non-polluting methods. The initialattempts with plant materials consisted of eorts to producevolatiles in plant cell or tissue cultures, either by de novo synthesisor by biotransformation of cheap precursors into high-valueproducts. Before that, biotransformation eorts involved fungi,yeast and bacterial cultures. Semi-synthetic methods, in which aprecursor is transformed into a useful product by isolatedenzyme preparations, crude or puried, have also beenattempted. Recently, most eorts have involved metabolic engi-neering of the biosynthetic pathways leading to the synthesis ofthe desired volatile. The various methods of biotechnology forproducing useful volatiles are discussed in this paper.

    Types of Volatile Metabolites with Flavourand Fragrance Qualities or with BiologicalAction and Their BiosynthesisOf the terpenoids, only members of the mono- (C10) and ses-quiterpenoid (C15) classes are suciently volatile. Volatility isdetermined not only by the size of the molecule and its stere-ochemistry, but mainly by its ability to form hydrogen bonds.Monoterpenoids whose molecule contains only carbons andhydrogens are very volatile. Those with one hydroxyl, keto,peroxy, or epoxy group are still volatile, but those with morehydroxyls are only slightly or not at all volatile. The same holdsfor the sesquiterpenoids, where one hydroxyl group seems tobe the maximum tolerated hydrogen bond-forming function forsucient volatility to be preserved in the molecule. Triterpe-noids and higher-order terpenoids are not volatile. Phenylpro-panoids and benzenoids, bearing up to one hydroxyl and nocarboxyl, are volatile. The simultaneous presence of a ketogroup does not abolish the volatility. However, more hydroxylsdrastically reduce or completely abolish the volatile properties.(Hydroxy)cinnamic acids are not suciently volatile, due to thepresence of the carboxyl group, unless it is esteried with avolatile alcohol. Aliphatic and olenic aldehydes, monoalcoholsand monoketones are volatile for at least up to 12-carbon sizes.As the molecule becomes smaller than ve carbons, even theacids are volatile. Organic monocarboxylic acids, esteried withvolatile alcohols, are also volatile. This type of compounds canbe divided in two categories. One has linear carbon chains andthe other has a methyl side-chain.

    Genetic engineering is a powerful method used to alter therate of volatile production by acting on the biosynthetic path-ways leading volatile synthesis. A short discussion of these path-ways seems pertinent at this point. The monoterpenoids areproduced by the plastidic methylerythritolphosphate (MEP)path, whose sequence and enzymatic properties have been

    elucidated almost to completion.[29] Its rate-limiting step is theone catalysed by 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase(DXS). NADPH, CTP and ATP are required for its operation. Con-densation of dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMADP) with isopente-nyl diphosphate (IDP) by the action of geranyl diphosphate(GDP) synthase leads to formation of the monoterpenoid pre-cursor GDP. Like all prenyltransferases, the GDP synthase is arather slow catalyst. The cis isomer neryl diphosphate (NDP) isalso formed. Cyclization of GDP is catalysed by the also slowcyclases, membrane-bound enzymes in the plastids and endo-plasmic reticulum. The hydroxylations of linear or cyclic monot-erpenes are catalysed by NADPH-consuming, cyt450-dependentmonoxygenases, utilizing molecular oxygen, but also able to usehydrogen peroxide produced from any source. These hydroxy-lases are inducible by a variety of biotic or abiotic stress factors.Sesquiterpenoids are considered to be synthesized in thecytosol from farnesyl diphosphate (FDP), derived from themevalonic acid pathway. Two NADPH and three ATP moleculesare consumed for FDP synthesis and the rate-limiting step iscatalysed by 3-hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase(HMGR). Sesquiterpene cyclases act on FDP to produce at least200 types of cyclic sesquiterpenoids.

    The phenylpropanoids are produced from phenylalanine andtyrosine, both derived from the shikimic acid pathway. A multi-tude of feedback-inhibited steps and a need for NADPH and ATPin the shikimic acid path ensure a tight regulation of Tyr and Phesynthesis. The requirement for NADPH is even greater in thetransformation of Phe and Tyr into phenylpropanoids. It isrequired for the removal of the carboxyl group of the propenylside-chain by successive reductions that form the correspondingvolatile aldehydes, alcohols and phenylpropenes. The carboxylgroup is rst esteried to coenzyme A, by specic ligases. Then itis transformed to an aldehyde group by an oxidoreductase andthe aldehyde is reduced into an alcohol by an alcohol dehydro-genase (ADH). Phenylpropenes are then produced from thealcohols. NADPH is also required for the hydroxylations of thearomatic ring. Benzoic and phenolic acids come from the corre-sponding hydroxycinnamic acids by b-oxidation of the propenylchain, followed by oxidative decarboxylation. This process istightly regulated by feedback inhibition. Volatile derivativesare then formed by the reduction of the carboxyl group, as inphenylpropanoids.

    Non-branched volatile aldehydes and their correspondingalcohols can be derived by degradation of unsaturated fattyacids, mainly linoleic and linolenic acid,[1012] by the sequentialaction of lipoxygenases (LOX), hydroperoxide lyases (HPL) andADH. The initial introduction of molecular oxygen into thecarboncarbon double bonds requires NADPH. These are cata-bolic reactions of the primary metabolism. Methyl-branchedcompounds, such as isovaleric and isobutyric acid, are derivedfrom leucine and valine catabolism. Isovaleric acid could poten-tially be produced from DMADP of the terpenoid synthesispathways. According to Hschle et al.,[13] branched volatiles canbe produced by catabolism of lineal terpenoids and of leucine-derived 3-methyl-crotonyl-CoA, the precursor of isovaleric acid,via degradation of the produced 3-methyl glutaryl-CoA. In bac-teria at least, they could be produced from linear monoterpe-noid or even sesquiterpenoid degradation.[14,15] Unlike the LOXpath, the degradations of leucine, valine, monoterpenoids andDMADP, leading to volatile aldehyde, alcohol and acid produc-tion, do not need reductive equivalents but rather producethem.

    368

    Y. Gounaris

    Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 367386View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • De novo Production of Volatiles by Tissueand Cell Cultures

    Plant Tissue and Cell Cultures

    Volatiles in callus and cell cultures. Producing compounds inplant cell, callus or tissue cultures has been attempted to ensurea stable supply and quality of the product. Some of the plantsused as sources for the desired substance are rare, slow-growingand found in not easily approachable regions of the world anddicult to cultivate. The in vitro cultures were expected to speedup the biomass propagation rate and to have it under controlledconditions and immediately available. These attempts encoun-tered serious diculties. The rate of secondary metabolite pro-duction by in vitro-cultured plant cells is orders of magnitudelower than that in the intact plant, usually in the range 0.10.01 g/l day.[16] Volatile compound yields are still lower and vola-tile secondary metabolites are present often in trace amountsdetected in cultures of various plant species, examples of whichare given in Table 1. Although cases of cultures showing higheryields of secondary metabolites than the intact plant areknown,[41] they are not involving volatiles. In many cases, thevolatiles found in the intact plant are not present at all in the invitro cultures. They are often dierent than those present in theintact plant. Volatile aldehydes, alcohols, ketones and acid estersappearmore frequently or for the rst time in in vitro cultures. Theterpenoids produced are in most cases glycosylated.

    The reasons for the reduced ability of the in vitro culturesto produce volatiles, and secondary metabolites in general,are not known with certainty. The cultured cells and callus seemto have some enzymatic activity for terpenoid production.[4244]

    Geranyl diphosphate synthase activity has been detected inplastids[45] but sesquiterpene cyclase has not.[4648] Accordingto Falk et al.,[49] the inability of cultured plant cells and callusto accumulate signicant amounts of monoterpenes, could bedue to the combined eect of lower enzymatic activity andtheir higher catabolic rate. Concerning the phenylpropanoidsynthesis potential, enzymatic activities of phenylalanineammonia lyase, shikimate dehydrogenase, cinnamic acid-4-hydroxylase, p-coumaric acid-3-hydroxylase, cinnamoyl-CoAreductase, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, 4-hydroxycinnamate:CoAligase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase and caeic acid-O-methyltransferase have been detected in callus or cell suspen-sions and are often equal to those in the intact plant.[5054] Of theenzymes of the volatile aldehyde and alcohol synthesis path,discussed below, lipoxygenase and hydroperoxide lyase activityhas been found to be present in in vitro-cultured plant tis-sues.[29,55,56] In cell suspension cultures of alfalfa, the hydroper-oxide lyase activity was rate-limiting.[57] The ability of culturedplant tissue and cells to produce volatiles is inducible by avariety of chemical and physical factors, as is also the ability forsecondary metabolite synthesis in general. The induction treat-ments increase the essential oil yield by up to ve-fold[58,59] insome oils containing novel terpenes or in oils of altered relativepercentage.[6062] Even under the optimum induction conditions,the yield of essential oil by in vitro-cultured plant tissues andcells is usually less than that achieved by the intact untreatedplant. Therefore, using cultured plant cells and calli for volatileproduction, even with the inclusion of elicitors and otherinducers, does not seem to be a particularly promisingundertaking.

    Volatiles in hairy roots. It is a general observation that sec-ondary metabolite yield by cell and callus cultures increases ifsome degree of cell dierentiation is induced. Genetic transfor-mation of plant tissue by insertion of the T-DNA regions of the Riplasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes results in the formation ofsmall, ne, hair-like root structures, known as hairy roots. Fourof the 18ORFs in theTL-DNA are essential for hairy root formation,of which ORF11 (rolB) is absolutely necessary. The TR-DNA carriestwo auxin synthesis genes, but by itself does not provoke hairyroots formation. Hairy roots lack geotropism, are highly branchedand can be cultured in bioreactor facilities needing no plantgrowth regulators, since the inserted T-DNA carries genes forauxin synthesis. They grow as fast, or faster, than normal roots,with meristem cell cycles averaging 10 h. They produce second-ary metabolites at levels and patterns similar to those of normalroots, but also metabolites produced in aerial parts of the plant.Often novel compounds are also produced. Unlike cell or calluscultures, hairy roots are biochemically stable and the T-DNA isstably integrated.

    Excellent reviews on the culture methodologies and morpho-logical and biochemical characteristics of hairy root cultures,including their potential for secondary metabolite production,have been published.[42,6366] Most of these reviews cover thewidespectrum of secondary metabolites and the preponderance ofthe cited cases concerns the production of non-volatile com-pounds, primarily alkaloids and secondarily some phenolics andnon-volatile higher terpenoids, with a few cases involving vola-tiles. However, Figueiredo et al.[63] focused on essential oils only;they listed 11 plant species whose hairy root cultures can synthe-size essential oil constituents. Among these, Pimpinella anisumand Achillea millefolium hairy roots are capable of essential oilyields similar to, or even higher than, those obtained with theroots of the parent plants. It is clear that hairy roots have thepotential for synthesizing both volatile and non-volatileterpenoids.

    Table 2 presents a list of additional examples, specically forvolatile compounds produced by hairy roots, mostly drawn fromFigueiredo et al.[63] In these, the essential oil was analysed to someextent, although the authors also cite the cases of Daucus carotaand Leontopodium alpinum hairy roots, whose main componentwas not identied. The yields are greatly elevated in comparisonto those of cell or callus cultures and can be further increased bythe inclusion of abiotic or biotic elicitors in the culturemedium. Aprospect for further increasing the volatile production from hairyroots is to genetically engineer their volatile production pathsusing transgenes inserted into the T-DNA region.

    Volatile Synthesis by Cultured Microorganisms

    Although a great deal of research on the biotechnology of vola-tiles still involves plants, especially eorts to increase terpenoidand phenolics production in transgenic plants, most of the recenteort is directed to usingmicroorganisms. Volatile aldehydes andalcohols are far more easily produced by cultured microorgan-isms, and eorts to genetically alter microbes for producing orbiotransforming terpenoids or phenolics were met with reward-ing success. Therefore, in most cases microorganisms are used fortheir production, instead of plant cell cultures. Also, microorgan-isms (bacteria, algae and fungi, including yeasts) are sturdier thanplant cells under bioreactor conditions. They are better suited towithstand the frictional stress imposed by the shaking proce-dures as well as various temporary extremes of pH, temperature

    369

    Biotechnology for essential oils, avours and volatile isolates

    Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 367386 View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.comCopyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • Table

    1.Vo

    latiles

    detected

    inplant

    cellor

    callu

    scu

    ltures

    Plan

    tProd

    ucts/rem

    arks

    Referenc

    e

    Agastacherogo

    sa(Koreanmint)

    VolatileC9-alde

    hyde

    san

    dalcoho

    ls,b

    utan

    edione

    .Dieren

    tfrom

    thosein

    intact

    plants

    [17]

    Artem

    isia

    dracun

    culus(tarrago

    n)Prod

    uctio

    nof

    phe

    nylpropen

    esof

    theessentialo

    il[18]

    Citrus

    sp.

    C.pa

    radisicallu

    sprodu

    ced40

    volatiles

    (mon

    o-,sesqu

    iterpen

    es,ade

    hyde

    san

    dhy

    droc

    arbon

    s),186

    mg/kg

    FW.Thisis5%

    ofpee

    loilyield.

    C.lim

    onprodu

    ced11

    mon

    oterpen

    esan

    dn-no

    nana

    l,40

    mg/kg

    FW.C

    .auran

    tifolia

    gave

    onlylim

    onen

    e,4.4mg/kg

    FW

    [19]

    Citrus

    sine

    nsis

    Novo

    latilecompon

    entswerede

    tected

    ,but

    embryog

    eniccallu

    sprodu

    ced10

    ingred

    ientsof

    oran

    geoil

    [20]

    Citrus

    aurantifo

    liaProd

    uced

    citrals,terpen

    ylacetate,do

    decana

    l[21]

    Coleon

    emaalbu

    mMon

    oterpen

    es.M

    oreifcu

    ltures

    unde

    rlig

    ht[22]

    Eucalyptus

    camaldu

    lensis

    Alkan

    es,alken

    es,alcoh

    olsin

    callide

    rived

    from

    stam

    ens

    [23]

    Eucalyptus

    citriodo

    raMon

    oterpen

    esin

    callide

    rived

    from

    immatureo

    wers

    [24]

    Melissa

    ocina

    lis(balm)

    Lowam

    ountsof

    2-phe

    nylethan

    ol,d-octalactone

    [25]

    Very

    lowam

    ountsof

    C6-alde

    hyde

    s,-alcoh

    olsan

    d-acetate

    asters.Large

    conc

    entrations

    ofglycosides

    ofne

    rol,citron

    ellol,

    geraniol,1-octen

    -3-ol

    [26]

    Men

    thapiperita(pep

    permint)

    Mintoilcom

    pon

    ents

    [27]

    Ocimum

    basilicum

    Essentialo

    ilingred

    ients

    [28]

    Oleaeuropa

    ea(olivetree

    )Prod

    ucemostof

    thevo

    latileC6-alde

    hyde

    s,-alcoh

    olsan

    d-acetylester

    foun

    dalso

    inoliveoil

    [29]

    Orig

    anum

    acutiden

    tsOrig

    anum

    oiling

    redien

    ts(38)

    [30]

    Orig

    anum

    vulgare

    Form

    ationof

    n-alkane

    s.Lack

    ofterpen

    oids

    even

    ingree

    ncalli

    [31]

    Oryza

    sativa

    Volatilehy

    droc

    arbon

    s,alcoho

    ls,keton

    esalde

    hyde

    s,esters.M

    ostwerepresent

    intheintact

    plant

    also

    [32]

    Petroselinum

    crispu

    m(parsley)

    Both

    types

    ofcu

    ltures

    produ

    cedno

    nana

    land

    decana

    l.Cellculturesprodu

    cedalso

    limon

    ene,acetop

    heno

    ne,n

    otfoun

    din

    callu

    sor

    inintact

    plants.Nophe

    lland

    rene

    ,apiole,m

    enthatrie

    ne,tha

    tas

    foun

    din

    intact

    plants

    [33]

    Salvia

    ocina

    lis(sag

    e)Lo

    wam

    ountsof

    essentialo

    il[34]

    Smyrnium

    perfoliatum

    a-Pine

    ne[35]

    Frag

    aria

    sp.(strawberry)

    Lowam

    ountsof

    ethy

    lbutyrate,butylbutyrate

    [36]

    1,2-Prop

    aned

    iol(a

    vour

    precu

    rsor)

    [37]

    Tacomasambu

    cofoliu

    mAccum

    ulationof

    phe

    nylpropan

    oidglycosides.

    [38]

    Taraxacum

    ocina

    le(dan

    delio

    n)Acetate

    butylester,2-methy

    l-1-propan

    ol,n

    -butan

    ol,4-phe

    nyl-1

    -butan

    ol,terpineo

    ls,4-hyd

    roxy-4-m

    ethy

    l-2-pen

    tano

    ne,

    acetate

    [39]

    Vanilla

    plan

    ifolia

    Vanillin

    [40]

    370

    Y. Gounaris

    Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 367386View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

  • and salt or deleterious metabolite concentrations created duringthe culture process. All classes of volatiles can be produced bymicroorganisms (Table 3), but aldehydes, alcohols and organicacid esters are in far greater preponderance, indicating a strongparticipation of catabolic processes. Microorganisms producingvolatiles have also been previously cited in several reviewarticles.[93,118124] In most cases the yield of the main compound is
  • Table

    3.Vo

    latilecompou

    ndsprodu

    cedby

    cultured

    microorga

    nism

    s

    Microorga

    nism

    Substrate/culture

    type

    Prod

    uct/remarks

    Referenc

    e

    Acetob

    actersp.

    Fuselo

    ilMethy

    lbutyricacid

    (precu

    rsor

    toarom

    as)

    [78]

    Aspergillu

    sniger

    Rice

    branoil(4g/lferulicacid)

    2.8g/lVan

    illin

    [79]

    Cocon

    utfat

    2-Und

    ecan

    one,2-no

    nano

    ne,2-hep

    tano

    ne.40%

    yield

    [80]

    Aspergillu

    soryzae

    castor

    oil

    g-Decalactone

    ,0.86g/l

    [81]

    Botryodiplod

    iatheobrom

    aeJasm

    onicacid,110

    0mg/l(10

    0mg/gdrycells)

    [82]

    Cand

    idagu

    illierm

    ondiiand

    othe

    rCa

    ndidaspecies

    Castoroil,de

    cano

    icacid

    g-Decalactone

    ,upto

    10g/lw

    ithcastor

    oilh

    ydrolysate

    [81]

    Ceratocystism

    briata

    Co

    eehu

    sks/So

    lid-state

    12Vo

    latiles,inc

    luding

    etha

    nol,acetalde

    hyde

    ,ethylacetate(m

    aincompon

    ent,25

    0mg/lp

    erkg

    drysubstrate),ethy

    lpropiona

    te,isoam

    ylacetate

    [83]

    Pervap

    orationbioreactor

    Estersan

    dalcoho

    ls.B

    anan

    a-likea

    vour

    [84]

    Ceratocystismon

    iliform

    isPe

    rvap

    orationbioreactor

    Ethy

    l-,propy

    l-,isob

    utyl-a

    ndisoa

    myl-acetates,citron

    ellol,ge

    raniol.A

    ll