35
102 Font review Susan Clements-Vivian

102 Font review

  • Upload
    telma

  • View
    32

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

102 Font review. Susan Clements-Vivian. Illuminated manuscript. Psalter-Hours English, 13th Century A.D. Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, MD. Before the invention of the printing press, handwritten documents were riddled with errors . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 102 Font review

102 Font reviewSusan Clements-Vivian

Page 2: 102 Font review

Illuminated manuscript

Psalter-HoursEnglish, 13th Century A.D.Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, MD.

Before the invention of the printing press, handwritten documents were riddled with errors.

Scribes invented visual, artistic ways to salvage these laboriously crafted objects.

Page 3: 102 Font review

Gutenberg’s moveable Type

Gutenberg’s moveable Type in Europe (1453-1455 A.D.)

metal type

Page 4: 102 Font review

Letterpress

Letterpress technology a classic typographic page

Typographic design is not only an act of mark making, but also of spacing.

Page 5: 102 Font review

Blackletter

Gutenberg’s moveable Type style “Blackletter”

Page 6: 102 Font review

Basics of Type Anatomy

Page 7: 102 Font review

Type Classification Systems

Essentially, classification describes typefaces; it does not define them.

Page 9: 102 Font review

Humanist / Old Style / Venetian 15th – 16th century

The Humanist types (sometimes referred to as Venetian) appeared during the 1460s and 1470s, and were modelled not on the dark gothic scripts like textura, but on the lighter, more open forms of the Italian humanist writers. **Note. In some classifications Humanist refers to Typefaces of the 15 th century and Old Style of the 16th.

Page 10: 102 Font review

Humanist / Old Style / Venetian

Examples of Old Style: Jenson, Bembo, Palatino, and — especially — Garamond, Old style is also called Humanist. Humanist Sans and Humanist are two different classifications. Humanist Sans is a 20th century variation of Humanist.

Page 11: 102 Font review

characteristics

1. Sloping cross-bar on the lowercase “e”;2. Relatively small x-height;3. 3 Low contrast between “thick” and “thin” strokes (basically that means that there is little

variation in the stroke width);

Page 12: 102 Font review

At Best, At Worst

Old Style faces at their best are classic, traditional, readable and at their worst are… well, classic and traditional.

Page 13: 102 Font review

Transitional

(mid 18th Century)

Examples of Transitional are Baskerville, Bookman (Linotype), Cheltenham (ITC), Clearface (ITC), Fournier, Joanna, Slimbach (ITC)

Page 14: 102 Font review

Characteristics Axis

Page 15: 102 Font review

Characteristics Contrast

Page 16: 102 Font review

characteristics Geometric

Page 17: 102 Font review

Modern

(late 18th century)

Examples Modern Bodoni and Didot.

Page 18: 102 Font review

Characteristics

Characteristics

1. High and abrupt contrast between thick and thin strokes;2. Abrupt (unbracketed) hairline (thin) serifs3. Vertical axis4. Horizontal stress5. Small aperture

Page 19: 102 Font review

example

Page 20: 102 Font review

At Best, At Worst

At their best, transitional and modern faces seem strong, stylish, dynamic. At their worst, they seem neither here nor there — too conspicuous and baroque to be classic, too stodgy to be truly modern.

Page 21: 102 Font review

Geometric Sans

Examples of Geometric/Realist/Grotesk Sans: Helvetica, Univers, Futura, Avant Garde, Akzidenz Grotesk, Franklin Gothic, Gotham.

Page 22: 102 Font review

characteristics

Geometric sans serifs are exactly what their name suggests; they are built on geometric shapes.

Page 23: 102 Font review

AT Best, AT Worst

These sans serifs are constructed of straight, monolinear lines and circular or square shapes. This can make them very cold and clinical, but also quite simple. The starkness of most geometric sans serifs makes for great headings, but they are usually less than ideal for long paragraphs. https://typekit.com/lists/geometric-sans-serifs

Page 24: 102 Font review

Humanist and Transitional Sans (20th century)

Examples of Humanist Sans: Gill Sans, Frutiger, Myriad, Optima, Verdana.

Page 25: 102 Font review

Transitional Sans

These are Sans faces that are derived from handwriting — as clean and modern as some of them may look, they still retain something inescapably human at their root.

Page 26: 102 Font review

AT Best, At Worst

At their best, Humanist Sans manage to have it both ways: modern yet human, clear yet empathetic. At their worst, they seem boring and mundane.

Page 27: 102 Font review

Slab Serifs / Egyptian

Examples of Slab Serifs: Clarendon, Rockwell, Courier, Lubalin Graph, Archer.

Page 28: 102 Font review

In typography, a slab serif typeface is characterized by thick, block-like serifs. Serif terminals may be either blunt and angular (Rockwell), or rounded (Courier). Slab serif typefaces generally have no bracket (feature connecting the strokes to the serifs).

Page 29: 102 Font review

AT Best, At Worst

Slab Serifs are hard to figure out. At their best they can seem very urban and at others invoke the American frontier (wild west). At worst they overpower and become overly conspicuous in the wrong surroundings.

Page 30: 102 Font review

Selecting a font

Page 31: 102 Font review

Selecting a font

A large type family like Helvetica Neue can be used to express a range of voices and emotions. Versatile and comfortable to work with, these faces are like a favorite pair of jeans for designers.

Page 32: 102 Font review

Selecting a mix

Page 33: 102 Font review

Do they work together?

Two typefaces work well together if they have one thing in common but are otherwise greatly different. This shared common aspect can be visual (similar x-height or stroke weight) or it can be from the same time period.

Page 34: 102 Font review

Contrast