59
1 Yoichi Aso Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology LIGO-G070796-00-Z LIGO-G070796-00-Z Improving the bandwidth and Improving the bandwidth and stability of interferometric stability of interferometric gravitational wave detectors gravitational wave detectors with suspension point with suspension point interferometers interferometers

1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

11

Yoichi AsoYoichi Aso

Columbia University, New York, NY, USAColumbia University, New York, NY, USAUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanUniversity of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Nov. 20 2007Nov. 20 2007CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of TechnologyCaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

LIGO-G070796-00-ZLIGO-G070796-00-Z

Improving the bandwidth and stability of Improving the bandwidth and stability of interferometric gravitational wave detectors interferometric gravitational wave detectors

with suspension point interferometerswith suspension point interferometers

Page 2: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

22

AcknowledgmentAcknowledgment

Masaki Ando, Kimio Tsubono, Shigemi Otsuka, Yoshikatsu NanjoMasaki Ando, Kimio Tsubono, Shigemi Otsuka, Yoshikatsu NanjoUniversity of Tokyo University of Tokyo

Matt EvansMatt EvansLIGO MITLIGO MIT

Bram SlagmolenBram SlagmolenAustralian National UniversityAustralian National University

Osamu Miyakawa, Hiro Yamamoto, Riccardo DeSalvoOsamu Miyakawa, Hiro Yamamoto, Riccardo DeSalvoLIGO CaltechLIGO Caltech

Kenji NumataKenji NumataNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterNASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Page 3: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

33

IntroductionIntroduction

Suspension Point Interferometer (SPI)Suspension Point Interferometer (SPI)Active vibration isolation schemeActive vibration isolation scheme

Sensor:Sensor: Auxiliary laser interferometers Auxiliary laser interferometers

Ultra low-frequency vibration isolationUltra low-frequency vibration isolation

Reduced RMS mirror motionReduced RMS mirror motionStabilization of the interferometerStabilization of the interferometerRobust lock acquisitionRobust lock acquisitionReduction of various technical noisesReduction of various technical noises

AdvantagesAdvantages

Prototype Experiment :Prototype Experiment : 1.5m Fabry-Perot interferometers 1.5m Fabry-Perot interferometersMaximum Maximum 40dB40dB noise suppression below 10Hz (in spectrum) noise suppression below 10Hz (in spectrum)

Mirror RMS motion Mirror RMS motion 1/91/9Mirror RMS speed Mirror RMS speed 1/71/7

Future detectors: Advanced LIGO, LCGT, LISAFuture detectors: Advanced LIGO, LCGT, LISA

Page 4: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

44

Seismic NoiseSeismic Noise

Low frequency limit of the observation bandLow frequency limit of the observation band Noises coupled with low frequency mirror motionsNoises coupled with low frequency mirror motions

Up-conversion by non-linearity of the detection systemUp-conversion by non-linearity of the detection system Horizontal-Pitch coupling by feedback forcesHorizontal-Pitch coupling by feedback forces Contrast defect (Laser noises)Contrast defect (Laser noises) Actuator noiseActuator noise

The dominant noise source of ground based GW detectorsThe dominant noise source of ground based GW detectors at low frequenciesat low frequencies

Stability of the interferometerStability of the interferometer

Readiness of lock acquisitionReadiness of lock acquisition

Duty cycleDuty cycle

SensitivitySensitivity

Various impacts on the IFOVarious impacts on the IFO

Page 5: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

55

Main Interferometer (MIF)Main Interferometer (MIF)For GW DetectionFor GW Detection

Suspension Point InterferometerSuspension Point InterferometerOriginally proposed by Drever (1987)Originally proposed by Drever (1987)

SPISPI

LasesLases Photo detectorsPhoto detectors

Several possible configurationsSeveral possible configurations

Conceptual diagramConceptual diagram

Page 6: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

66

LaserLaser

Rigid BarRigid Bar

SPI is lockedSPI is locked

SPISPI

MIFMIF

Working Principle of SPI: Fabry-Perot ArmWorking Principle of SPI: Fabry-Perot Arm

Fabry-Perot InterferometerFabry-Perot InterferometerMeasures the distance betweenMeasures the distance betweenthe two mirrorsthe two mirrors

SPISPI

Virtual rigid barVirtual rigid bar

Page 7: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

77

Rigid BarRigid Bar

LaserLaser

Working Principle of SPI: Fabry-Perot ArmWorking Principle of SPI: Fabry-Perot Arm

Differential Seismic MotionDifferential Seismic Motion

Page 8: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

88

Rigid BarRigid BarRigid BarRigid Bar

Common mode motionCommon mode motion

Identical PendulumsIdentical Pendulums

No change in the distanceNo change in the distance

Working Principle of SPI: Fabry-Perot ArmWorking Principle of SPI: Fabry-Perot Arm

Asymmetry ?Asymmetry ?

Page 9: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

99

Theoretical PerformanceTheoretical Performance

Rigid barRigid bar

H 1 H 2

CMRR =2∣H 1−H 2

H 1H 2∣

Simple PendulumsSimple Pendulums

Example: CMRR of Simple PendulumsExample: CMRR of Simple Pendulums

Other FactorsOther Factors

Cross coupling from other degrees of freedomCross coupling from other degrees of freedom Vertical, Pitch, Yaw etc ... Vertical, Pitch, Yaw etc ...

Control gain of SPIControl gain of SPI

Noise of SPINoise of SPI

Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR)Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR)

H 1,H 2Transfer functions:Transfer functions:

Conversion coefficient Conversion coefficient Common motion Common motion Differential motionDifferential motion

0Average resonant frequency:Average resonant frequency:

Symmetry is ImportantSymmetry is Important

0

CMRR=2 0

0

Resonant frequency Resonant frequency difference:difference:

0

2 0

0

Page 10: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1010

Comparison with conventional vibration isolation techniquesComparison with conventional vibration isolation techniques

Passive vibration isolationPassive vibration isolationHarmonic Oscillators ( Pendulum etc.)Harmonic Oscillators ( Pendulum etc.)

Isolation: above the resonant frequencyIsolation: above the resonant frequency

Low frequency: no isolationLow frequency: no isolationAt the resonance: vibration amplificationAt the resonance: vibration amplification

Measure the ground motion by sensorsMeasure the ground motion by sensors

Active vibration isolationActive vibration isolation

Cancel the vibration by feedbackCancel the vibration by feedbackWidely used sensor: AccelerometersWidely used sensor: Accelerometers

SPISPI

Reference frameReference frame= = Local inertial frameLocal inertial frame

Measuring the same DOF as the main interferometerMeasuring the same DOF as the main interferometer

Global Global DisplacementDisplacement Sensor Sensor DC sensitivityDC sensitivity

DC vibration isolation performanceDC vibration isolation performance

Low noise (Potentially as good as the main interferometer)Low noise (Potentially as good as the main interferometer)

No DC sensitivityNo DC sensitivity

Page 11: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1111

Advantages of SPIAdvantages of SPI

Low Noise SensorLow Noise Sensor

Displacement sensor (global sensor) DC sensitivityDisplacement sensor (global sensor) DC sensitivity Ultra low-frequency vibration isolation Ultra low-frequency vibration isolation

CharacteristicsCharacteristics

BenefitsBenefits

Direct reduction of seismic noise in the observation bandDirect reduction of seismic noise in the observation band

Reduction of the RMS motion of the mirrorsReduction of the RMS motion of the mirrors

Stable OperationStable Operation

Robust lock acquisitionRobust lock acquisition

Technical noisesTechnical noises

Laser noises Laser noises Actuator noisesActuator noisesUp-conversion noise by non-linearityUp-conversion noise by non-linearity

Duty Cycle ImprovementDuty Cycle Improvement

to name a fewto name a few

Page 12: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1212

Prototype ExperimentPrototype Experiment

PDPD PDPD

PDPDIsolatorIsolator

EOMEOM

EOMEOM

SPI MirrorSPI Mirror

Main MirrorMain Mirror Recoil MassRecoil Mass

λ/4λ/4

λ/4λ/4

LaserLaser

PBSPBS

PBSPBS

Mode CleanerMode Cleaner

SPISPI

MIFMIF

1.5m long Fabry-Perot interferometers1.5m long Fabry-Perot interferometers

Triple pendulum suspensionsTriple pendulum suspensions

Triangular rigid cavity mode-cleaner: Frequency StabilizationTriangular rigid cavity mode-cleaner: Frequency Stabilization

Page 13: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1313

1.5m1.5m

Overview of the experimental setupOverview of the experimental setup

Page 14: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1414

Nd:YAG Laser (1064nm)Nd:YAG Laser (1064nm)

Page 15: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1515

PD1PD1

PD2PD2

MCMC

40MHz EOM40MHz EOM

TelescopeTelescope

PicomotorPicomotor

Mode Cleaner ChamberMode Cleaner Chamber

Page 16: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1616

Suspension SystemSuspension System

Recoil massRecoil mass

Main massMain mass

SPI massSPI mass

MGAS filter 2MGAS filter 2

Damping stageDamping stage

MGAS filter 1MGAS filter 1

1m1m

Triple PendulumTriple Pendulum

Two MGAS filtersTwo MGAS filters (vertical isolation) (vertical isolation) Resonance ~ 200mHz Resonance ~ 200mHz

Temperature drift Temperature drift compensation servo compensation servo for MGAS filters for MGAS filters

Recoil mass to actuateRecoil mass to actuate the main mirror the main mirror

Page 17: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1717

MGASMGAS

Damping StageDamping Stage

SPI MirrorSPI Mirror

Main MirrorMain Mirror

Page 18: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1818

MGAS FilterMGAS Filter

Positive Spring (restoring force)Positive Spring (restoring force) Negative Spring Negative Spring Elastic force, gravityElastic force, gravity BucklingBuckling

++Extremely small spring constantExtremely small spring constant

Resonant frequency < 0.2HzResonant frequency < 0.2Hz

Dia. 40cm, Maraging SteelDia. 40cm, Maraging Steel

Tuning: load, horizontal compression Tuning: load, horizontal compression

Large temperature driftLarge temperature drift

Compensation servoCompensation servo

MGASMGAS==MMonolithic onolithic GGeometric eometric AAnti nti SSpringpringLow Frequency Vertical SpringLow Frequency Vertical Spring

MGAS FilterMGAS Filterused in this experimentused in this experiment

Avoid vertical vibration to overwhelm the horizontal motionAvoid vertical vibration to overwhelm the horizontal motion

Page 19: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

1919Damping PlateDamping Plate

Horizontal ActuatorHorizontal Actuator

Vertical ActuatorVertical ActuatorYaw ActuatorYaw Actuator

Eddy Current DampingEddy Current Damping

Page 20: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2020

Damping MassDamping Mass

Nd MagnetNd MagnetMGAS FilterMGAS Filter

Balance WeightBalance Weight

Page 21: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2121Photo SensorPhoto Sensor

Wire ClampWire Clamp

Page 22: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2222

MCMCLaserLaser

PDPD

MIFMIF

MGAS MGAS 2F2F

MGAS MGAS 1F1F

MGAS MGAS 2E2E

MGAS MGAS 1E1E

FMGAS

F MC

FMGAS

FMGAS

FMGAS

FMIF

SPISPI

F SPI

Laser IntensityLaser Intensity&Freq. Stabilization&Freq. Stabilization

MGAS drift compensation MGAS drift compensation

Cavity Length ControlCavity Length Control

Control SystemControl System

F Int

Sensor: Fabry-Perot Cavity (PDH)Sensor: Fabry-Perot Cavity (PDH)Actuator: Coil-MagnetActuator: Coil-MagnetUGF: 1kHzUGF: 1kHzGain: 80dB@10HzGain: 80dB@10Hz

Sensor: Fabry-Perot Cavity (PDH)Sensor: Fabry-Perot Cavity (PDH)Actuator: Coil-MagnetActuator: Coil-MagnetUGF: 1kHzUGF: 1kHzGain: 80dB@10HzGain: 80dB@10Hz

Intensity StabilizationIntensity StabilizationSensor: Photo DetectorSensor: Photo DetectorFeedback: LD CurrentFeedback: LD CurrentUGF: 1kHzUGF: 1kHz

Frequency StabilizationFrequency StabilizationSensor: Mode Cleaner CavitySensor: Mode Cleaner CavityFeedback: Feedback: Laser Crystal Temperature, PZTLaser Crystal Temperature, PZTUGF: 20kHzUGF: 20kHz

Intensity StabilizationIntensity StabilizationSensor: Photo DetectorSensor: Photo DetectorFeedback: LD CurrentFeedback: LD CurrentUGF: 1kHzUGF: 1kHz

Frequency StabilizationFrequency StabilizationSensor: Mode Cleaner CavitySensor: Mode Cleaner CavityFeedback: Feedback: Laser Crystal Temperature, PZTLaser Crystal Temperature, PZTUGF: 20kHzUGF: 20kHz

Sensor: Photo SensorSensor: Photo SensorActuator: Coil-MagnetActuator: Coil-MagnetUGF: Below 0.1HzUGF: Below 0.1Hz

Sensor: Photo SensorSensor: Photo SensorActuator: Coil-MagnetActuator: Coil-MagnetUGF: Below 0.1HzUGF: Below 0.1Hz

Page 23: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2323

ResultsResults

Spectral measurementsSpectral measurements

Transfer function measurementsTransfer function measurements

Page 24: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2424

Displacement Equivalent Noise Spectrum (MIF)Displacement Equivalent Noise Spectrum (MIF)

Page 25: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2525

Displacement Equivalent Noise Spectrum (MIF)Displacement Equivalent Noise Spectrum (MIF)

40dB40dB

RMS: 1/9RMS: 1/9

Page 26: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2626

Mirror Speed SpectrumMirror Speed Spectrum

Speed RMS: 1/7Speed RMS: 1/7 Easier Lock AcquisitionEasier Lock Acquisition

Page 27: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2727

Transfer FunctionTransfer Function

Pitch resonancesPitch resonancesMGAS resonanceMGAS resonance

SPI OFFSPI OFF

SPI ONSPI ON

Model: 0.25% asymmetryModel: 0.25% asymmetry

ExciteExcite

MeasureMeasure

Up to 20HzUp to 20Hz ~ ~ 40dB40dB isolation isolation

Page 28: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2828

Advanced LIGO SPIAdvanced LIGO SPI

Primary MotivationPrimary Motivation

Robust Lock AcquisitionRobust Lock Acquisition

Estimates of BSC vibration by RanaEstimates of BSC vibration by Rana

RMS mirror speed ~ in noisy time RMS mirror speed ~ in noisy time 10−6 m/ sec

by O. Miyakawaby O. Miyakawa

Reduce the mirror speed by SPIReduce the mirror speed by SPI

First fringe lock is difficultFirst fringe lock is difficult

First fringe lock of FP arms is necessaryFirst fringe lock of FP arms is necessary

less than 25 nm/sec is required less than 25 nm/sec is required

During OperationDuring Operation

Improved stability / duty cycleImproved stability / duty cycle Reduced up-conversion noiseReduced up-conversion noise Reduced pitch motion (horizontal-to-pitch coupling)Reduced pitch motion (horizontal-to-pitch coupling) Better contrastBetter contrast Other noises related to large low-frequency motion of the mirrorsOther noises related to large low-frequency motion of the mirrors

Page 29: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

2929

AdvLIGO SPI ConfigurationAdvLIGO SPI Configuration

Penultimate masses are not exposed to the beam tubePenultimate masses are not exposed to the beam tube Hang SPI mirrors from the seismic platformHang SPI mirrors from the seismic platform Actuation: seismic platform (ISI)Actuation: seismic platform (ISI)

ISIISI ISIISI

But rigid mount is not usableBut rigid mount is not usablebecause of tilt couplingbecause of tilt coupling

ISIISI ISIISI

Decouple the tilt by a pendulumDecouple the tilt by a pendulum(Matt Evans)(Matt Evans)A bit degraded high frequency performanceA bit degraded high frequency performance

Alternative configurationAlternative configurationSuspended PeriscopeSuspended Periscope

Page 30: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3030

Single Pendulum SPISingle Pendulum SPI

(Drawings by Dennis Coyne)(Drawings by Dennis Coyne)

Page 31: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3131

AdvLIGO SPI Performance EstimatesAdvLIGO SPI Performance Estimates(simulation code by Matt Evans)(simulation code by Matt Evans)

SPI: Single pendulum suspended from ISISPI: Single pendulum suspended from ISI Fabry-Perot-Michelson, Arm finesse = 10, Input power = 1mWFabry-Perot-Michelson, Arm finesse = 10, Input power = 1mW SPI feedback to ISI, UGF = 8HzSPI feedback to ISI, UGF = 8Hz

Total RMS: (Without SPI), (With SPI) Total RMS: (Without SPI), (With SPI) 0.15 m 0.7nmMore than a factor of 200 reductionMore than a factor of 200 reduction

Page 32: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3232

Speed SpectraSpeed Spectra

Total RMS: (Without SPI), (With SPI) Total RMS: (Without SPI), (With SPI) 0.2 m/ sec 2.1nm/ secAbout a factor of About a factor of 100100 improvement. improvement.Less than Less than 25nm/sec25nm/sec

http://ilog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu:7285/advligo/SPI_SPIhttp://ilog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu:7285/advligo/SPI_SPIhttp://www.ligo.caltech.edu/docs/T/T070209-00.pdfhttp://www.ligo.caltech.edu/docs/T/T070209-00.pdf

More discussions can be found belowMore discussions can be found below

Page 33: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3333

Pseudo Random Noise Heterodyne InterferometryPseudo Random Noise Heterodyne Interferometry& Lock Acquisition Interferometer& Lock Acquisition Interferometer

A new idea for Advanced LIGO lock acquisition by ANU groupA new idea for Advanced LIGO lock acquisition by ANU group Heterodyne interferometry with PRN digital modulationHeterodyne interferometry with PRN digital modulation Distinguish the motions of multiple objects in the light pathDistinguish the motions of multiple objects in the light path

by time delayed PRN demodulation by time delayed PRN demodulation Large dynamic range with a reasonable sensitivity (~ 1nm)Large dynamic range with a reasonable sensitivity (~ 1nm) Pre-lock the mirrors with this technique (Lock acquisition interferometer) Pre-lock the mirrors with this technique (Lock acquisition interferometer)

Page 34: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3434

Monitor the positions of individual mirrors by the PRN techniqueMonitor the positions of individual mirrors by the PRN technique before the main interferometer is locked before the main interferometer is locked

Apply feedback forces to bring the mirrors to the appropriate positionsApply feedback forces to bring the mirrors to the appropriate positions for the operation of the interferometer for the operation of the interferometer

Page 35: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3535

Experimental Demonstration at ANUExperimental Demonstration at ANU

Displacement sensitivity characterized by Displacement sensitivity characterized by comparison with PDH locking of FP cavity comparison with PDH locking of FP cavity

Page 36: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3636

Page 37: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3737

SPI auxiliary mirrorSPI auxiliary mirror

SAS: 3 stage anti-SAS: 3 stage anti-vibration system with vibration system with inverted penduluminverted pendulum

Main mirrorMain mirror

Heat links start from thisHeat links start from thisstage to inner radiation shieldstage to inner radiation shield

LCGTLCGTConceptual DesignConceptual Design

Radiation outer shieldRadiation outer shield

Vacuum is commonVacuum is common

Sapphire fiber Sapphire fiber suspending main mirrorsuspending main mirror

LCGT and SPILCGT and SPI

Page 38: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3838

Cool down mirrors:Cool down mirrors:Heat link wiresHeat link wires

Extra vibration Extra vibration is introducedis introduced

Suppress it by an SPISuppress it by an SPI

Heat links:Heat links:Attached to the penultimate massAttached to the penultimate mass

Close to the main interferometerClose to the main interferometer

Low noise sensor is criticalLow noise sensor is critical

Page 39: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

3939

Vibration introduced from heat linksVibration introduced from heat links(simulation by T. Uchiyama)(simulation by T. Uchiyama)

Point mass model of LCGT SASPoint mass model of LCGT SAS-40dB isolation enhancement by SPI-40dB isolation enhancement by SPIVertical to horizontal coupling = 1%Vertical to horizontal coupling = 1%

Page 40: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

GSFC SPIGSFC SPI

Verifying LISA interferometer

– Stable environment for high sensitivity

• Testing of each optical bench needs moderate thermally stable environment (like LTP).

• Testing of two (or more) optical benches/spacecrafts– Needs extremely stable environment between two benches

(~10pm/rtHz)– Drifts of mechanical/optical components: ~1um (=1,000,000pm)

• Every LISA testbed is designed to become insensitive to the relative bench motion.

– The motion is the GW signal that LISA is supposed to detect.– Detection and active suppression of environmental motions

• Using multiple stabilization interferometers and multi-DOF actuators

Page 41: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

PhotographsPhotographs

Installed components

– Vacuum system

– Hexapod

– Control system

• Digital control (3 DOFs)

– Iodine stabilized lasers

– Interferometers

• Silicate bonded optics on ULE plates

• 3 stabilization interferometers

– Length, yaw & pitch motion

• 1 measurement interferometer

Page 42: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

Stabilization resultsStabilization results

Current control performance

– In spectrum

• Gain ~1000 achieved

• 3rd beam (pitch) didn’t help stability

– Still above LISA requirement

– In time-domain

• Typical free-running drift : ~4umpp/day (over 1m separation)

• Typical stabilized drift : ~20nmpp/day

-20x10-9

-10

0

10

20

Dis

pla

cem

ent

[m]

50403020100

Time [hour]

3DoF control w/freq. stab.

10-12

10-11

10-10

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

Dis

pla

cem

ent

No

ise

[m/r

tHz]

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Frequency[Hz]

Free-running 3DoF control w/o freq. stab. 3DoF control w/freq. stab.

2DoF control w/freq. stab. LISA goal

Page 43: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4343

ConclusionConclusion

SPI: Low-noise low-frequency active vibration isolation schemeSPI: Low-noise low-frequency active vibration isolation schemeUltra low-frequency performance: Ultra low-frequency performance: RMS reductionRMS reduction

Prototype ExperimentPrototype Experiment

1.5m Fabry-Perot interferometer, Triple pendulum suspension1.5m Fabry-Perot interferometer, Triple pendulum suspension

Noise spectrum: maximum Noise spectrum: maximum 40dB40dB reduction reduction Displacement RMS:Displacement RMS: 1/91/9 Velocity RMS: Velocity RMS: 1/71/7

Vibration isolation performance improvement: more than Vibration isolation performance improvement: more than 40dB40dB up to 20Hz up to 20Hz

Stable operation, Robust lock acquisition, Technical noise mitigationStable operation, Robust lock acquisition, Technical noise mitigation

Spectral measurementsSpectral measurements

Transfer function measurementsTransfer function measurements

Future detectors are considering the use of SPI Future detectors are considering the use of SPI LCGT, Advanced LIGOLCGT, Advanced LIGO

LISA TestLISA Test

Page 44: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4444

Extra SlidesExtra Slides

Page 45: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4545

Z-StageZ-Stage

Z-StageZ-Stage

MGAS FilterMGAS Filter

Top StageTop Stage

Page 46: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4646

PicoMotorPicoMotor

Coil-Magnet ActuatorCoil-Magnet Actuator

Photo SensorPhoto SensorWire ClampWire Clamp

Torsion Coil SpringTorsion Coil Spring

Page 47: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4747

MirrorMirror

SPI MassSPI MassHorizontal ActuatorHorizontal Actuator

Vertical ActuatorVertical Actuator

Page 48: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4848

Final StageFinal Stage Recoil MassRecoil Mass

MIF MirrorMIF MirrorWire ClampWire Clamp

Page 49: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

4949

Coil-Magnet ActuatorCoil-Magnet Actuator

Motion LimiterMotion Limiter

Page 50: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5050

Actuator MagnetsActuator Magnets

Damping MagnetsDamping Magnets

Recoil MassRecoil MassMain MassMain Mass

Page 51: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5151

Page 52: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5252

Seismic Noise EstimateSeismic Noise Estimate

SPI OFFSPI OFFSuspension TFSuspension TF

× Seismic Motion× Seismic MotionEstimate Estimate

SPI ONSPI ONEstimateEstimate

(Accelerometer)(Accelerometer)

Page 53: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5353

In-line motionIn-line motionSeismic - IFO outputSeismic - IFO output

CorrelationCorrelation

VerticalVertical

Good correlation when SPI is OFFGood correlation when SPI is OFF

Good correlation when SPI is ONGood correlation when SPI is ON

Seismic motion: measured bySeismic motion: measured by an accelerometeran accelerometer

SPI ONSPI ONVertical Motion is DominantVertical Motion is Dominantat low frequenciesat low frequencies

Page 54: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5454

Laser NoisesLaser Noises

Page 55: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5555

Electric NoisesElectric Noises

Page 56: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5656

Thermal noise, Shot noiseThermal noise, Shot noise

Page 57: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5757

Total estimated noiseTotal estimated noise

Noise shape: OKNoise shape: OK

Magnitude: Small discrepancyMagnitude: Small discrepancy

Page 58: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5858

Noise of the SPINoise of the SPI

Page 59: 1 Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Nov. 20 2007 CaJAGWR Seminar @ California Institute of Technology

5959