Upload
zoe-lang
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties in Climate Scenarios
• Goal of this session:
• understanding the cascade of uncertainties
• provide detail on the uncertainties in emissions scenarios
• provide detail on the uncertainties in regional climate change predictions
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties in the Development of Climate ScenariosPRECIS Workshop, MMD, KL, November 2012
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties
• Emissions
• Concentration
• GCMs
• Regional modelling
• Climate scenario construction
• Impacts
Stages required to provide climate scenarios
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties 1: Emission Scenarios
• Uncertainties in the key assumptions and relationship about future population, socio-economic development and technical changes.
• The consequent uncertainties are unquantifiable as IPCC does not assign probabilities to any of choices of the key assumptions involved
• We are currently working with 2 sets of scenarios: SRES (used for CMIP3/IPCC AR4) and RCPs (used for CMIP5/AR5)
© Crown copyright Met Office
ImpactsClimate
scenariosAtmospheric
concentrations
Emissions scenarios
Socio-economic scenarios
SRES: Sequential approach to developing climate scenarios
• Climate modellers await results from socio-economic modellers
• Emissions scenarios chosen early on are restrictive.. E.g. no exploration of deliberate mitigation strategies, difficult to explore uncertainties in carbon cycle feedbacks.
© Crown copyright Met Office
RCPs: Parallel approach to generating climate scenarios
Impacts
Emissions scenarios
Atmospheric concentrations (‘Representative Concentration Pathway’, RCPs)
Climate scenarios
Integrated assessment
modellers and climate modellers
work simultaneously
and collaboratively
Socio-economics
Policy Intervention (mitigation or adaptation)
Carbon cycle and atmospheric chemistry
© Crown copyright Met Office
Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties 2: Concentration Scenarios
Uncertainties in the understanding of the processes and physics in the carbon cycle and chemistry models
2 major sets of developments in recent years which affect how we address this uncertainty:
- Use of RCP scenarios
- Development of models with interactive carbon cycle and atmospheric chemistry (ESMs)
Older models with no interactive carbon cycle/chemistry use a single set of concentrations derived from 'offline' carbon cycle/chemistry models
Many models now include coupled carbon cycle and atmospheric chemistry models, Allows feedbacks to be represented
© Crown copyright Met Office
Carbon cycle model - HadCM3C
Coupled to standard HadCM3 atmosphere, ocean and interactive sulphur cycle.
Moses 2.1/ Triffid
land surface scheme:
Dynamic Vegetation
newHadOCC:
Ocean biology/carbon cycle model
Prescribe CO2 emissions
Photosynthesis
Respiration
© Crown copyright Met Office
Impact of perturbations on the atmospheric CO2
17 member ensemble of HadCM3C
Historical and A1B SRES future scenario
CO2 concentration (ppm)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Impact of perturbations on global mean temperature.
Relative impact of uncertainties in the terrestrial carbon cycle (green) and atmospheric feedbacks (blue)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties 3: Climate models
• Incorrect, incomplete or missing description of key processes and feedbacks in the climate system e.g.
• Representation of clouds
• Complexity of sea-ice model
• Feedback from land-use change
• Internal (natural) variability of the climate system
• Decadal variability means that 30-year samples of a climate state may differ substantially
© Crown copyright Met Office
Climate model formulation
© Crown copyright Met Office
Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere
Land surfaceLand surfaceLand surfaceLand surfaceLand surface
Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice
Sulphateaerosol
Sulphateaerosol
Sulphateaerosol
Non-sulphateaerosol
Non-sulphateaerosol
Carbon cycle Carbon cycle
Atmosphericchemistry
Ocean & sea-icemodel
Sulphurcycle model
Non-sulphateaerosols
Carboncycle model
Land carboncycle model
Ocean carboncycle model
Atmosphericchemistry
Atmospheric
chemistry
Off-linemodeldevelopment
Strengthening coloursdenote improvementsin models
1985 1992 1997
HADLEY CENTRE EARTH SYSTEM MODEL
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties in climate model
Large Scale Cloud
Ice fall speed
Critical relative humidity for formation
Cloud droplet to rain: conversion rate and threshold
Cloud fraction calculation
Convection
Entrainment rate
Intensity of mass flux
Shape of cloud (anvils) (*)
Cloud water seen by radiation (*)
Radiation
Ice particle size/shape
Cloud overlap assumptions
Water vapour continuum absorption (*)
Boundary layer
Turbulent mixing coefficients: stability-dependence, neutral mixing length
Roughness length over sea: Charnock constant, free convective value
Dynamics
Diffusion: order and e-folding time
Gravity wave drag: surface and trapped lee wave constants
Gravity wave drag start level
Land surface processes
Root depths
Forest roughness lengths
Surface-canopy coupling
CO2 dependence of stomatal conductance (*)
Sea ice
Albedo dependence on temperature
Ocean-ice heat transfer
Rainfall change: IPCC CMIP3
Combination of pattern and some sign differences lead to lack of consensus
© Crown copyright Met Office
Temperature and precipitation changesAfrica, A1B, 2090s, CMIP3 ensemble
Figure 11.2
© Crown copyright Met Office
Uncertainties 4: Climate change scenarios and impacts
• Climate change scenarios for impacts studies can be derived by:
• Combining climate model and observed data
• Using climate model data directly
• Choices are often required when considering:
• How to provide information at fine scales
• How to apply changes in the mean climate or climate variability
• As with climate modelling, the physical processes involved in studying climate impacts are often not well understood or well-simulated
© Crown copyright Met Office
Source of uncertainties
Source of Uncertainty Represented in Climate Scenarios?
Ways to address it
Alternative emission scenarios Yes Scale GCM patterns by the ratio of the radiative forcing
Emissions to concentrations Beginning Use GCMs that include interactive chemistry
Modelling the climate response
Different responses by different GCMs for the same forcing.
Yes Use a range of GCMs
Signal (response)/noise (internal climate variability)
Not normally Use ensemble simulations
Providing regional climate scenarios
Baseline and future climates Yes Use observed or model baseline and different methods for changes
Adding high resolution detail Yes Use of a range of dynamical and statistical techniques
© Crown copyright Met Office
Q: Which are the most ‘important’ sources of uncertainty?
A: That depends on the timescale that we are looking at…
Natural variability most important on timescales 0-20 years, small by 100 years
Emissions scenario important on timescales 40 years +
Model uncertainty important at all timescales
IPCC AR4 SPM mean precipitation change summary figure
• Model consensus does not imply reliability- understanding mechanisms provides basis for a
prediction• Lack of consensus implies no information
- but assessed at grid-scale thus maybe misleading• Many tropical and sub-tropical regions appear uncertain
…”But, what about the white bits?”
• Cannot distinguish between ‘all models show small changes around zero’ and ‘large changes of different sign
• Consensus is measured at GCM grid-box scale, whilst signal might only be evident at larger spatial scale
• % change misleading in regions/seasons where rainfall is close to zero
0
x
xx
x
x
x
x
xx
xx
x
+
-
Key land areas where message has changed:
West Africa (DJF),South Asia (DJF), Australia (DJF) Southern South America (JJA), Northern Australia /SE Asia (JJA)
Remaining areas of disconsensus:
South America (DJF), North America (JJA), Northern/Central Africa (JJA)
© Crown copyright Met Office
To summarise
• There are many uncertainties which need to be taken into account when assessing climate change (and its impact) over a region
• The better we understand the uncertainties at each stage of the process, the better we are equipped to apply climate projections/scenarios appropriately.
• Confidence in climate model projections come from process understanding , not just model consensus
© Crown copyright Met Office
Questions