View
75
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Evaluation – the first step of change
19th - 25th October 2008 Druskininkai
Vlastimil Fiala Gymnazium dr. A. Hrdlicky Humpolec
Evaluation in CZ
• The new phenomenon in education ????
• Teachers don't like it because of • Polititians and
specialists‘ preasure
Evaluation
• Teachers don't like only the word
because
• They use the evaluation methods every day in their job, in their institution, in their daily life
Evaluation
• Everybody (even teachers) would like to be satisfied with his/her job, life, partner, hobbies,..
• He/she has to compare, evaluate the current situation, to look back and forward to understand what is necessary for the next improvement
Evaluation – the necessary base for next development
• 1st possibility – to study scientific articles of the pedagogical
specialists as a theoretical ground for next steps
– to use tools of other institutions (schools, universities, private companies)
+ • the best information • a lot of ideas • experience • the possibility to co-
operate with the authors
- • wide range of articles
and tools
Evaluation – the necessary base for next development
2nd possibility • All the activities are not based on any theoretical principles or
scientific articles
• All made steps are intuitive steps – They solve the current situation and appeared problems
• „Home made“ tools
I trust only the figures
that are manipulated/ falzificated by myself
+ • to solve the current
situation • adrenalin sport • good chance for new
ideas of students and staff
- • the results shoud be
different from our aims
Safe evaluation way – not only one method
Initialization
Method 2
Method 1
The results discussion
Method 3
• questionaire • interwiev • discussion - the group meetings • .. • .. • ..
? The evaluation methods
Only a taste of some of them ! • Evaluation of the relationship in
• school
• library
• class
• arbitrary group
Description of Activity
• Team work • Chess piece positions • Chess piece description • Documentation • Evaluation – systemic evaluation
Summary of the Systemic Evaluation
The class – the distinct restrained subsystem
Other classes – 3 classes are a part of the close subsystem, which is open (pieces can move). The rest of the classes are at different distances – indicating different relationship
The class teacher – his position is in the middle of the space near the centre of the class subsystem
The heads – the headmaster is a part of the „close“ subsystem, the deputy head is in the corner
The other teachers – the „close“ space is open, it slowly links to the wider system of the whole school
The Common Class Aspects
The subsystem of the class is clearly structured with clear boundaries.
The class teacher is a part of subsystem, he is in a hierarchic position in one case, in other cases he is in a balanced position in the context of the whole subsystem.
There is no central position (the chicks round the hen).
All the students perceive the head of the school similarly, he is in a prominent position, close to the students.
A small task Evaluation of the course atmosphere
• Team work • Chess piece description
– White king + queen – you – White pawns – other participants – Black pawns – hosts
• Chess piece positions – current feeling • Documentation – camera • Evaluation – external evaluation
Description of Activity • The students were divided into groups
– Each class could make 4 teams with 4 – 5 participants • Moderated brainstorming
– The leader of brainstorming explained the rules of activities
– The leader of brainstorming determined the structure of each topic
• Documentation – Different methods
• Evaluation – Evaluation was made by the leader of brainstorming – The main ideas were chosen
Class structure Very active students
quite good ideas
Quite passive students excelent ideas
Passive students almost excelent ideas
Passive students poor ideas
Documentation
• if not, then it is – very difficult to remember all the ideas – impossible to be able to feel the atmosphere in the
group after a few days – impossible to describe the situation of the meeting to
the people that didn´t join the activity – very difficult to compare similar group meetings
is necessary
Recommended