1 FY02 ASA Presentation Provide Mail Services Presented by: James V. Spears Team Members: Angela...

Preview:

Citation preview

1

FY02 ASA Presentation

Provide Mail Services

Presented by:

James V. Spears

Team Members:

Angela MiltonTracy Niksich

Office of Research ServicesNational Institutes of Health

18 November 2002

2

ASA Template - 2002

Customer Value Proposition

Team Leader

Provide Mail Services

DS5: Management of Postal Accounting System

Discrete Services

Service Group

DS3: Process and Dispatch Outgoing Mail

Customer Intimacy Sustain

DS1: Process and Deliver Incoming Mail

DS2: Perform Mail Directory/Locator Service

DS6: -------------Not Used------------------------

DS4: Process/Deliver Inter-Office Mail

Product Leadership Harvest

James Spears

Operational Excellence Growth

Service Strategy

Team Members Angela MiltonTracy Niksich

Receive, process and deliver mail to provide users with a timely, accurate, and convenient service to distribute information that complies with U.S. Government and USPS standards.

3

Customer Perspective

4

DS1: Customer Segmentation Process and Deliver Incoming Mail

MAIL STOPS BY BUILDING

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

31

NS

C (6

001 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

Rklg

II (6701 R

ockle

dge D

rive)

EP

N (6

130 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

EP

S (6

120 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

6116 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

36

50

13

1 10401 F

ern

wood rd

2 D

em

ocra

cy P

laza (6

707 D

em

ocra

cy b

lvd)

12

Tra

ilers

Rklg

I (6705 R

ockle

dge D

rive)

49

30

6700-B

Rockle

dge D

r.8 45

6 2 6100 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

40

9 6011 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

4 14

37

6B

Info

rmatio

n W

ay

NS

A (3

01 N

. Sto

nestre

et a

ve.)

5 41

22

6006 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

6101 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

Federa

l (7550 W

isconsin

ave.)

60

1 D

em

ocra

cy P

laza (6

701 D

em

ocra

cy b

lvd)

15 Q

trs18T

5 R

esearc

h C

ourt (5

RC

)5413 W

. Cedar ln

.6610 R

ockle

dge D

r.A

TC

(8717 G

rovem

ont c

ircle

)G

DC

-Ware

house (1

6050 In

dustria

l rd.)

KW

C (9

610 M

edic

al C

ente

r dr.)

Navy (8

901 W

isconsin

ave.)

Park

5 (1

2420 P

ark

law

n d

r.)T

win

bro

ok I (5

640 F

isher ln

.)W

illco b

ldg (6

000 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

3 11

16

21

28

29

38

61

62

64

82

10A

15K

16A

28A

5415 W

. Cedar ln

.6001 M

ontro

se R

d6010 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

8424 H

elg

erm

an c

t.9101 O

ld G

eorg

eto

wn rd

.A

MS

BS

A (9

190 W

isconsin

ave.)

CO

DC

(12300 T

win

bro

ok p

kw

y)

CO

MM

DIA

Fire

house

Gara

ge

Gate

way (7

201 W

isconsin

ave)

NO

HIC

Tw

inbro

ok II (1

2441 P

ark

law

n d

r.)V

isio

nW

IN

Building

Mail

Sto

ps

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Mail Stops Cumulative Percentage

80.7%

5

DS1: Customer Segmentation Process and Deliver Incoming Mail

• 21% NIH buildings (18 of 85) accounted for 80% of all mailstops

• 32 buildings account for only one mailstop each

• mailstops are not evenly distributed among buildings

•The average number of mailstops per building is 13.3

6

DS1: Customer Segmentation Process and Deliver Incoming Mail

• Fewer mailstops per building means that mail delivery is more time consuming than if the mailstops were distributed among fewer, larger buildings

• Mail comes to NIH from around the world

•impossible to formally document the primary sources of mail.

7

% of Total Directory Mail Generated, By Month

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

DS2: Customer Segmentation Perform Mail Directory / Locator Service

8

• The volume of directory mail stays proportionate with the volume of first class mail

• On a monthly basis, any differences in directory mail generation by different first class mail types (e.g. FedEx bills, Christmas cards, etc.) cancel each other out

• Directory services are only performed after the incoming mail volume has been processed for delivery and does not increase variable costs

DS2: Customer Segmentation Perform Mail Directory / Locator Service

9

DS3: Customer Segmentation Process and Dispatch Outgoing Mail

IC Ranking by Postage Expenses

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

Acct.

-18

Acct.

-55

Acct.

-54

Acct.

-56

Acct.

-11

Acct.

-24

Acct.

-20

Acct.

-16

Acct.

-17

Acct.

-14

Acct.

-23

Acct.

-33

Acct.

-38

Acct.

-8A

cct.

-5A

cct.

-26

Acct.

-13

Acct.

-10

Acct.

-49

Acct.

-22

Acct.

-27

Acct.

-19

Acct.

-2A

cct.

-47

Acct.

-25

Acct.

-30

Acct.

-42

Acct.

-3A

cct.

-12

Acct.

-48

Acct.

-32

Acct.

-29

Acct.

-9A

cct.

-41

Acct.

-28

Acct.

-52

Acct.

-37

Acct.

-21

Acct.

-51

Acct.

-1A

cct.

-6A

cct.

-4A

cct.

-39

Acct.

-35

Acct.

-50

Acct.

-40

Acct.

-45

Acct.

-36

Acct.

-46

Acct.

-53

Acct.

-34

Acct.

-44

Acct.

-7A

cct.

-15

Acct.

-31

Acct.

-43

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Postage Expenses Cumulative Percentage

79.8%

10

DS3: Customer Segmentation Process and Dispatch Outgoing Mail

• 16% of NIH postage accounts (9 of 56) accounted for 80% of all postage used

• 55% of NIH postage accounts (31 of 56) accounted for only 3% of all postage used

• Outgoing mail has priority only after all incoming mail has been dispatched for delivery at 12:30 p.m.

• All Outgoing mail is processed daily before USPS pick-up.

11

DS4: Customer Segmentation Process and Deliver Inter-Office Mail

MAIL STOPS BY BUILDING

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

10

31

NS

C (6

001 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

Rklg

II (6701 R

ockle

dge D

rive)

EP

N (6

130 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

EP

S (6

120 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

6116 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

36

50

13

1 10401 F

ern

wood rd

2 D

em

ocra

cy P

laza (6

707 D

em

ocra

cy b

lvd)

12

Tra

ilers

Rklg

I (6705 R

ockle

dge D

rive)

49

30

6700-B

Rockle

dge D

r.8 45

6 2 6100 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

40

9 6011 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

4 14

37

6B

Info

rmatio

n W

ay

NS

A (3

01 N

. Sto

nestre

et a

ve.)

5 41

22

6006 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

6101 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

Federa

l (7550 W

isconsin

ave.)

60

1 D

em

ocra

cy P

laza (6

701 D

em

ocra

cy b

lvd)

15 Q

trs18T

5 R

esearc

h C

ourt (5

RC

)5413 W

. Cedar ln

.6610 R

ockle

dge D

r.A

TC

(8717 G

rovem

ont c

ircle

)G

DC

-Ware

house (1

6050 In

dustria

l rd.)

KW

C (9

610 M

edic

al C

ente

r dr.)

Navy (8

901 W

isconsin

ave.)

Park

5 (1

2420 P

ark

law

n d

r.)T

win

bro

ok I (5

640 F

isher ln

.)W

illco b

ldg (6

000 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd)

3 11

16

21

28

29

38

61

62

64

82

10A

15K

16A

28A

5415 W

. Cedar ln

.6001 M

ontro

se R

d6010 E

xecutiv

e b

lvd

8424 H

elg

erm

an c

t.9101 O

ld G

eorg

eto

wn rd

.A

MS

BS

A (9

190 W

isconsin

ave.)

CO

DC

(12300 T

win

bro

ok p

kw

y)

CO

MM

DIA

Fire

house

Gara

ge

Gate

way (7

201 W

isconsin

ave)

NO

HIC

Tw

inbro

ok II (1

2441 P

ark

law

n d

r.)V

isio

nW

IN

Building

Mail

Sto

ps

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Mail Stops Cumulative Percentage

80.7%

12

DS4: Customer Segmentation Process and Deliver Inter-Office Mail

• 21% NIH buildings (18 of 85) accounted for 80% of all mailstops

• 32 buildings account for only one mailstop each

• Inter-Office mail is processed separate from incoming mail when processed for delivery

• Inter-Office mail cannot be tracked by source as Inter-Office mail lacks a return address

• All Inter-Office mail is processed daily

13

DS5: Customer Segmentation Management of Postal Accounting System

IC Ranking by Postage Expenses

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

Acct.

-18

Acct.

-55

Acct.

-54

Acct.

-56

Acct.

-11

Acct.

-24

Acct.

-20

Acct.

-16

Acct.

-17

Acct.

-14

Acct.

-23

Acct.

-33

Acct.

-38

Acct.

-8A

cct.

-5A

cct.

-26

Acct.

-13

Acct.

-10

Acct.

-49

Acct.

-22

Acct.

-27

Acct.

-19

Acct.

-2A

cct.

-47

Acct.

-25

Acct.

-30

Acct.

-42

Acct.

-3A

cct.

-12

Acct.

-48

Acct.

-32

Acct.

-29

Acct.

-9A

cct.

-41

Acct.

-28

Acct.

-52

Acct.

-37

Acct.

-21

Acct.

-51

Acct.

-1A

cct.

-6A

cct.

-4A

cct.

-39

Acct.

-35

Acct.

-50

Acct.

-40

Acct.

-45

Acct.

-36

Acct.

-46

Acct.

-53

Acct.

-34

Acct.

-44

Acct.

-7A

cct.

-15

Acct.

-31

Acct.

-43

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Postage Expenses Cumulative Percentage

79.8%

14

DS5: Customer Segmentation Management of Postal Accounting System

• 16% of NIH postage accounts (9 of 56) accounted for 80% of all postage used

• 55% of NIH postage accounts (31 of 56) accounted for only 3% of all postage used

15

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)

• 20.4% rate of return (224 of 1100)

• The range of the rating scale was from A (excellent) to E (poor) in order to keep the grading system familiar to respondents

• Scoring was done on the collegiate system (e.g. A=4.0, B=3.0, etc.)

• The overall mean score (excluding N/A responses) of 3.0 is equal to a “B” (very good)

16

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)

Mean Score by Question

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Question Number

Mea

n Sc

ore

17

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)

Poll Analysis By Question: Percent “C” (Acceptable) or better

93%

79%

99%96%

68%

94%

82%

95%

88%91%

97% 98% 99% 98% 97%

91%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Question Number

Percent "C", or Better

18

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)

Poll Analysis By Question: Percent “C” or better

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

1 2 2a 2b 2c 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Overa

ll0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Percent "C" or Better Mean Score

Percent "C" or Better vs. Mean Score by Question

19

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)

Poll Analysis:

• Low scores given for Question 2 were nearly all related to Question 2c (per their comments)

• Many complaints from Question 2c were due to a misconception among some employees concerning positional mail

• Complaints from Question 4 were primarily concerned with slower delivery of poorly addressed interoffice mail (e.g. see following slide)

20

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)(cont.)

21

Customer Satisfaction (Poll)Poll Analysis:

• The lower than average mean score (2.68) for Question 6 was not unexpected, this is the most difficult mail type to process to intended recipient

• The 88% “C” or better for Question 6 shows that most of our customers understand that this mail is difficult to process and they feel that we are doing an acceptable to excellent job with it

22

Reduce Customer Complaints Regarding MissortsCOMPLAINTS: MISSENT MAIL

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

sorter error not properly endorsed by recipient sorter forwarding error

Error Type

# o

f C

om

pla

ints

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Per

cen

t

# of Missorts Cumulative Percent

22%

5%

73%

23

Reduce Customer Complaints Regarding Missorts

• There is no source pattern to the complaints as they are addressed immediately with corrective action and verified continuously for several weeks to be certain the problem is solved

24

Internal Business Process Perspective

25

Block Diagram: Provide Mail Services

ProcessMail

DriversDeliver

Incomingand

InterOfficeMail

Processand

DispatchOutgoing

Mail

ManagePostal

AccountingSystem

DeliveryDriversReturn

withOutgoing

Mail

Discrete Services for MCSB:

• Are sequential in nature

• Cannot be performed out of order

• Must all be performed on a daily basis

26

• Our Service Group completed Five deployment flowcharts for Five discrete services

• Production of the deployment flowcharts, and verification by sorters confirmed that management’s perception and understanding of the process workflow was correct and complete.

• MCSB Management monitor every step of the work-flow process for standards compliance

Conclusions from Discrete Services Deployment Flowcharts

27

Process Measures

List process measures for each discrete service

• DS1-1: Time of day at route midpoint• DS1-2: Error Rate from Random Samplings • DS2: Error Rate from Random Samplings • DS3: Error Rate from Random Samplings • DS4: Error Rate from Random Samplings • DS5: Dollar savings vs. Postal OMAS

statement

28

Process Measure Results

Findings from process measures data:

DS1: Process and Deliver Incoming Mail• Control Charts showed that the driver

delivery times were consistently within normal variation when regular drivers were present

• Random Samplings from clerk sortation showed a 1.06% initial error rate for September.

DS2: Perform Mail Directory/Locator Service• Random samplings showed no clerk look-

up errors

29

Process Measure Results

Findings from process measures data:

DS3: Process and Dispatch Outgoing Mail• Random Samplings of meter-stamped

outgoing mail showed a 0.21% error rate for September. All errors were from one day. Cause of error was failure to apply oversize surcharges where needed

DS4: Process and Deliver Inter-Office Mail• Random samplings of inter-office mail

showed no clerk sortation errors.

30

Process Measure Results

Findings from process measures data:

DS5: Management of Postal Accounting System

• $8,748,000 savings vs. OMAS statement by disputing unauthorized charges from USPS and other sources since 1992.

31

Learning and Growth Perspective

32

Turnover:• Turnover is expected to become an issue

for MCSB in the near term• Turnover will be less of an issue in the

longer term, due to increased outsourcing of duties within MCSB

Sick Leave:• MCSB has the lowest sick leave usage of

any Service Group in the study, despite having one employee on long-term sick leave during the whole of the study period. This is due to high morale and dedication to duty within MCSB

Conclusions from Turnover, Sick Leave, Awards, EEO/ER/ADR Data

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

14 3 9 31 8 17 43 38 36 33 41 12 30 32 28 18 29 21 39 20 16 24 27 40 35 5 23 42 19 4 34 15 37 25 26 1 2 10 11 13 7

Average Hours of Sick Leave Used(Oct 2001 - June 2002)

Service Group Number

Av

era

ge

Ho

urs

34

Awards:• By giving awards where deserved and

spreading them fairly between Management and Clerk employees, MCSB has created a high-morale environment

EEO Complaints:• MCSB EEO complaint average was based

on only one complaint. This was due to the termination of an employee who was trying to avoid this management action.

Conclusions from Turnover, Sick Leave, Awards, EEO/ER/ADR Data

35

ER:• MCSB ER average is higher than the

MCSB ADR average, due to the fact that MCSB counsels employees and provides numerous opportunities for reform before taking corrective action

ADR:• MCSB ADR average was higher than

would normally be expected due to the efforts of two employees who were trying to avoid progressive corrective action and eventually, termination.

Conclusions from Turnover, Sick Leave, Awards, EEO/ER/ADR Data

36

• All major skills and abilities required by MCSB are present among current employees

• MCSB is currently short by six positions. It is expected that these positions will be filled through outsourcing

• Since 850,000 sq ft of NIH lab space is expected to be created over the next three years, MCSB must be prepared to constantly reexamine its’ needs and to amend the current mail services contract, as needed

• MCSB must continue to promote safety / security awareness, teambuilding, and computer skills through the use of available training classes to keep employee skills up-to-date

• MCSB must begin to analyze options for replacing it’s Pitney-Bowes Paragon® postage machines to ensure best value for NIH

Analysis of Readiness Conclusions

37

Financial Perspective

38

Unit Cost Measures

Analysis:

• “Process / Deliver Incoming Mail” – Cost per hour is relatively stable, but dependent on set wage rates

• “Mail Directory / Locator services” – No direct variable costs associated

• “Process and Dispatch Outgoing Mail” – No direct variable costs associated

• “Process / Deliver Inter-Office Mail” – No direct variable costs associated

39

Unit Cost Measures

Analysis:

• “Manage Postal Accounting System” –Postage costs by IC must be tracked to

•properly attribute time and costs

•accurately assess IC’s for next Fiscal Year

•ensure accurate USPS billing

40

Asset Utilization Measures

Productive hours per FTE 1840

Number of FTE Positions 30

Total Productive Hours Available 55,200

Productive Hours Spent per task Pct Down Time Hours Downtime

Process * Deliver Inter-Office Mail 7,176 13% 0% 0

Manage Postal Accounting System 2,760 5% 0% 0

Process * Dispatch Outgoing Mail 12,144 22% 0% 0

Process * Deliver Incoming Mail 27,600 50% 1% 276

Mail Directory * Locator Services 5,520 10% 0% 0

Totals 55,200 100% 0.50% 276

Asset Utilization 99.50%

MCSB ASSET UTILIZATION

41

Asset Utilization Measures Analysis:

Idle Capacity:

•The daily weekday period between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (14 hours), and Saturday-Sunday, represents the weekly operational Idle Capacity.

•This idle capacity is not marketable.

• The operation is not staffed during this period.

• due to security concerns, the area must have restricted access

42

Asset Utilization Measures

Analysis:

Non-Productive Capacity:

• Standby time is minimal

• Due to the flexibility of our operation there is no waste of time resources.

• Rework due to sorting errors is very small.

• Scheduled Maintenance occurs only during those times when equipment is not expected to be in use

43

Unique Financial Measures

Reduce Dollar Amount of USPS (OMAS) Billing Errors:

• MCSB records from the last 10 years show that $8,748,000 has been recovered, to date, from the USPS and other sources as a result of MCSB-initiated billing inquiries

• Results from the careful record keeping and management of the postal accounting system by MCSB

44

Unique Financial Measures

POSTAL OVERCHARGES RECOVERED BY NIH

$-

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

$3,500,000

$4,000,000

$4,500,000

$5,000,000

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Year

Yea

rly

Fu

nd

s R

eco

vere

d

$-

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

$7,000,000

$8,000,000

$9,000,000

$10,000,000

Cu

mu

lati

ve F

un

ds

Rec

ove

red

Amount Cumulative Amount

45

Conclusions and Recommendations

46

Conclusions from FY02 ASA

Major Findings:

• Deployment flowcharts confirmed that management’s perception and understanding of the process workflow was correct and complete

• Process perspective studies show that delivery times are consistent within normal variation when regular delivery drivers are present

47

Conclusions from FY02 ASA

Major Findings:

• Random samplings showed no or low error rates for the process perspective of DS 1 - 4

• DS 5, Management of the Postal Accounting System has been very effective in preventing waste

48

Conclusions from FY02 ASA

Major Findings:• MCSB is prepared for the near term with

regard to employee skills• MCSB has high morale and dedication, as

evidenced by having the lowest sick leave usage rate in the group studied

• MCSB must be prepared to constantly re-examine its’ needs and to amend the current mail services contract, as needed in order to meet needs created by future growth

49

Conclusions from FY02 ASA

Countermeasures begun:

• MCSB has begun contacting those respondents to our poll who showed concern over mail forwarding. MCSB representatives will explain the rules and regulations concerning positional mail and mail forwarding

• MCSB is preparing a fact sheet on positional mail to be distributed to all mailstops at a future date

50

• That MCSB move forward with its educational campaign to explain about positional mail and forwarding

• That MCSB continue to monitor delivery driver standards to ensure consistency of delivery both on and off campus

Recommendations

51

• That MCSB continue to take random samplings of work that forms our discrete services to ensure quality and compliance with standards

• That MCSB continue to review the USPS OMAS billings and recover funds where NIH has been billed in error

Recommendations

Recommended