View
508
Download
1
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Jerry Yudelson and Prof. Alison Kwok present the results of their research on high-performance building design, with a focus on integrated design, all at the 2013 Living Future Unconference in Seattle.
Citation preview
Promise vs. Performance
The World’s Greenest Buildings:
Jerry Yudelson
Yudelson Associates
Why Performance Reports?
One Shelley St. Sydney, Australia
Performance
Reporting Informs
Manitoba Hydro PlaceWinnipeg, Canada
What’s The Issue?
Some Green Buildings Under-Performing . . .
OHSU Center For Health & HealingPortland, OR
ONLY Performance Counts!
Total Carbon Emissions Count
Bank of America Tower New York City
Forum Chriesbach Dübendorf, Switzerland
Europe: Measure Total Carbon Emissions
Epson Atrium
How Much Energy Should Buildings Use?
What’s The Benchmark?
World’s Greenest Buildings: Research
One Bligh— Sydney, Australia
North American Buildings: LEED Platinum
Manitoba Hydro PlaceLEED Platinum
Winnipeg, Canada
Portland, OR
Twelve WestDouble LEED Platinum
European Buildings: LEED Platinum/Equal
Berlin, GermanyDGNB Gold
Heinrich Böll Foundation
Dubendorf, SwitzerlandSwiss Minergie Plus
Forum Chriesbach
Asia/Pacific Buildings: LEED Platinum/Equal
Perth, Australia6-Star Green Star
2 Victoria Avenue
Tainan City, Taiwan
Magic School of Green Technology
Where Do We Go From Here?
The Race For A Green Future Is On . . .
© 2013 Yudelson Associates
But If It Doesn’t Perform . . .
© 2
013
Yud
elso
n A
ssoc
iate
s
. . . It Can’t Be Green!
Thank You!
© 2
013
Yud
elso
n A
ssoc
iate
s
© 2
013
Yud
elso
n A
ssoc
iate
s
greenbuildconsult.com/blogjerry@greenbuildconsult.com
@jerryyudelson
DOWNLOAD Slideshare.net/yudelson
The World’s Greenest Buildings Promise vs. Performance in SustainableDesign/Stories from Design Practice
Living Futures 2013 May 15-17, 2013
Alison G. Kwok, PhD, AIA, LEED APUniversity of Oregon
6
12
47,412
3
5
31
12
47,412
3
5
31
6 Case Studies
47,412
3
5
31Interviews
12
6
3
5
31
Words
6
12
47,412
3
31
6
12
47,412 5 Categories
47,412
3
5
Subcategories
31
6
12
47,412 5
Themes 3 6
12 31
Tillamook Forest Center
The Gerding Theater Chartwell School
Orinda City HallE. Portland Community Center
Stephen Epler Hall
Case Studies
Design Teams
Chartwell School
Seaside, CA
Orinda City Hall
Orinda, CA
Stephen Epler Hall, PSU
Portland, OR
Tillamook Forest Center
Tillamook, OR
The Gerding Theater
Portland, OR
East Portland Community Ctr.
Portland, OR
Information
21,000 s.f.
completed 2006
Predicted 50% below code
Measured EUI 27.9
kBtu/sf/year
13,900 s.f.
completed 2007
Predicted 72% below code
Modeled EUI: 59.6
kBtu/sf/year
64,400 s.f.
completed 2003
Predicted 49% below code
Measured EUI: 41 kBtu/sf/year
18,800 s.f.
completed 2006
Predicted 30% below code
Measured EUI: 99 kBtu/sf/year
55,000 s.f.
completed 2006
Predicted 35%
below code
Measured EUI: 61 kBtu/sf/year
22,000 s.f.
completed 2008
Predicted and measured data not available
Architect
EHDD Architecture
San Francisco, CA
Siegel & Strain Architects
Emeryville, CA
Mithūn Architects
Seattle, Washington
Miller Hull Partnership
Seattle, Washington
GBD ArchitectsPortland, OR
SERA Architects
Portland, OR
Engineer
Taylor EngineeringAlameda, CA
Taylor EngineeringAlameda, CA
Interface EngineeringPortland, OR
PAE Consulting Engineers
Portland, OR
Glumac Engineers
Portland, OR
Interface EngineeringPortland, OR
Project Details
Digging Deeper
“We actually came in and added to the goal setting.”
“The design process was much more integrated and each person had to step outside of their specialized role to make the project a success.”
“Our involvement at that point was much higher than usual on most projects, and the best early collaborative design that I’ve seen on green projects.”
“We went back and forth and it was a very open and cooperative arrangement. We never felt that he was telling us, you have to do this.”
“It was probably the greatest asset that we all knew each other and [got] along really well.”
1 Collaboration fuels goal setting & decision making
“Our job is to really make sure that, from the very beginning, clients understand what the give and take will be to deliver a more sustainable building.”
“We never want to force something that’s innovative, risky, or challenging on the client.”
“They were open minded to test new ideas”
“When you make good projects, you can only go as far as your clients are willing to go.”
2 Innovation requires client buy-in
“The energy use, particularly the carbon component of that energy, was very important for me.”
“It dovetailed into what LEED was at the time.”
“It certainly made us more willing to invest more time for the energy modeling because we expected to get some money back.”
“Incentives helped the owner look at some of the things they normally wouldn’t have looked at.”
“The project was such a small scale that the incentives…are not worth our time to fill out.”
3 Mandates and incentives influence, but do not drive, decision-making
AIA Upjohn Research Initiative
US Green Building Council
Center for Housing Innovation, University of Oregon
National Science Foundation
Richard L. Hayes, AIA Knowledge Resources
John Forester, Cornell University
Research Assistants: Tom Collins, Britni L. Jessup, Kristen B. DiStefano, Amanda M. Rhodes, and Rachel B. Auerbach, University of Oregon
Acknowledgements
Thank you
Alison G Kwok, PhD. AIA, LEED APUniversity of Oregone-mail: akwok@uoregon.edu
Recommended