Upload
vikram-dahiya
View
1.061
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Session statistical process control (spc) in six sigma
Citation preview
1
Total Quality Management
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Need
X bar and R charts
P chart
C chart
Applications
Variation
Variation is natural - it is inherent in the world around us.
No two products or service experiences are exactly the same.
With a fine enough gauge, all things can be seen to differ.
One of the roles of management is work with all employees to reduce variation as much as possible.
The Presence of Variation
8’
4’ 4’ 4’ 4’ Measuring
Device
Tape Measure 4’ 4’ 4’ 4’
Engineer Scale 4.01’ 4.01’ 4.01’ 4.00’
Caliper 4.009’ 3.987’ 4.012’ 4.004’
Elec. Microscope 4.00913’ 3.98672’ 4.01204’ 4.00395’
Types of Variation
Common Cause Variation: The variation that naturally occurs
and is expected in the system
-- normal
-- random
-- inherent
-- stable
Special Cause Variation: Variation which is abnormal -
indicating something out of the ordinary has happened.
-- nonrandom
-- unstable
-- assignable cause variation
Type of Variation Travel Time to Work Example
Measurement of Interest: Time to get to work.
Common Cause Variation Sources:
-- traffic lights
-- traffic patterns
-- weather
-- departure time
Special Cause Variation Sources:
-- accidents
-- road construction detours
-- petrol refills
Total Product or Process Variation
Total variation = Common Cause + Special Cause
To reduce Total Variation
First reduce or eliminate special cause variation
Reduce common cause variation
Identify the source and remove the causes
2
Measures performance of a process
Uses mathematics (i.e., statistics)
Involves collecting, organizing, &
interpreting data
Objective: provide statistical when
assignable causes of variation are
present
Used to – Control the process as products are produced
– Inspect samples of finished products
Statistical Quality
Control
Statistical
Quality Control
Process
Control
Acceptance
Sampling
Variables
Charts
Attributes
Charts Variables Attributes
Types of
Statistical Quality Control
Has or Has not/Good
or Bad/Pass or
Fail/Accept or Reject
Characteristics for
which you focus on
defects
Categorical or
discrete random
variables
Attributes Variables
Quality
Characteristics
Measured values;
e.g., weight, length,
volume,voltage, current etc.
May be in whole or in
fractional numbers
Continuous random variables
Statistical technique used to ensure
process is making product to standard
All process are subject to variability
– Natural causes: Random variations
– Assignable causes: Correctable problems
Machine wear, unskilled workers, poor
material
Objective: Identify assignable causes
Uses process control charts
Statistical Process
Control (SPC)
Comparing Distributions Production Output Example
Plant A Plant B
99 100 100 100 101
Units Produced
90 90 100 110 110
No Differences!???
1005
500
n
XX 100
5
500
n
XX
Production Output Distributions What is the Difference?
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Plant A
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Plant B
Fre
qu
ency
F
req
uen
cy
3
Measure of Variation (Sigma) S = Standard Deviation
Plant A
99 99-100 = -1 12 = 1 100 100-100 = 0 02 = 0 100 100-100 = 0 02 = 0 100 100-100 = 0 02 = 0 101 101-100 = 1 12 = 1
X )( XX
0
1
)( 2
n
XXS
2)( XX
2
707.4
2S
X )( XX 2)( XX
90 90 -100= -10 -102 =100 90 90 -100= -10 -102 =100 100 100 -100 = 0 02 = 0 110 110 -100 = 10 102 =100 110 110 -100 = 10 102 =100
0 400
104
400S
Plant B
The Concept of Stability
99.7%
+ 3S - 3S - 2S - 1S +1S +2S
95%
68% X X X X X X
XX
Plant A
100X
707.1001 SX
414.1012 SX
121.1023 SX
707.4
2S
293.991 SX
586.982 SX
879.973 SX
X
Under Normal Conditions:
68 percent of the time output will be between 99.293 and
100.707 units
95 percent of the time output will be between 98.586 and
101.414 units
99.7 percent of the time output will be between 97.879 units
and 102.121 units
Plant B
100X
1101 SX
1202 SX
1303 SX
104
400S
901 SX
802 SX
703 SX
X
Under Normal Conditions:
68 percent of the time output will be between 90 and 110 units
95 percent of the time output will be between 80 and 120 units
99.7 percent of the time output will be between 70 units and
130 units
Control Limits
Control Limits are the statistical boundaries of a process
which define the amount of variation that can be considered
as normal or inherent variation
3 sigma control limits are most common
+ 3S from the mean If the process is in control, a value outside the control limit will occur only 3 time in 1000 ( 1 - .997 = .003)
Process Control Limits
Lower Control Limit
Upper Control Limit
Special Cause Variation
Special Cause Variation
Average
Com
mon
Cau
se UCL= +3
LCL = - 3
X
X
4
Relationship Between
Population and Sampling
Distributions
Uniform
Normal
Beta
Distribution of sample means
x means sample of Mean
n
xx
Standard deviation of
the sample means
(mean)
x2 withinfall x all of 95.5%
x3 withinfall x all of 99.7%
x
3 x
2 x
1 σx x
1 x
2 x
3
Three population distributions
Sampling Distribution of
Means, and Process
Distribution
Sampling
distribution of the
means
Process
distribution of
the sample
)mean(
mx
X
As sample size
gets
large
enough,
sampling distribution
becomes almost
normal regardless of
population
distribution.
Central Limit Theorem
XX
Theoretical Basis
of Control Charts
X
Mean
Central Limit Theorem
xx
n
x
x
nX X
Standard deviation
X X
Theoretical Basis
of Control Charts
Process Control Limit Concepts
Control Limits Define the limits of stability
The ULC and LCL are calculated so that, if the process is stable, almost all of the process output will be located within the control limits.
3 sigma control limits
The most commonly used
UCL is 3 standard deviations above the average
LCL is 3 standard deviations below the average
If the process is stable, only about 3 out of 1000 process outputs will fall outside the control limits.
Process Control Limit Concepts (continued)
Measures inside control limits are assumed to come from a stable process - Measures outside the control limits are unexpected and considered the result of a special cause
The control limits are computed directly from the sample data selected from the process -- The limits and the average are not the choice of management or the operator - Formulas exist.
The control limits define the range of inherent variation for the process as it currently exists, not how we would like it to be
5
Show changes in data pattern
– e.g., trends
Make corrections before process is out of
control
Show causes of changes in data
– Assignable causes
Data outside control limits or trend in data
– Natural causes
Random variations around average
Control Chart Purposes
Control
Charts
R Chart
Variables
Charts
Attributes
Charts
X Chart
P Chart
C Chart
Continuous
Numerical Data
Categorical or Discrete
Numerical Data
Control Chart Types
Produce Good
Provide Service
Stop Process
Yes
No
Assign. Causes? Take Sample
Inspect Sample
Find Out Why Create
Control Chart
Start
Statistical Process
Control Steps Commonly Used Control Charts
Variables data
x-bar and R-charts
x-bar and s-charts
Charts for individuals (x-charts)
Attribute data
For “defectives” (p-chart, np-chart)
For “defects” (c-chart, u-chart)
Type of variables control chart
Shows sample means over time
Monitors process average
Example: Weigh samples of coffee &
compute means of samples; Plot
X Chart X Chart
Control Limits
Sample
Range at
Time i
# Samples
Sample
Mean at
Time i
From
Table
RAxx
LCL
RAxx
UCL
2
2
n
R
Ri
n
1i
n
xi
n
ix
6
Factors for Computing
Control Chart Limits
Sample
Size, n
Mean
Factor, A2
Upper
Range, D4
Lower
Range, D3
2 1.880 3.268 0
3 1.023 2.574 0
4 0.729 2.282 0
5 0.577 2.115 0
6 0.483 2.004 0
7 0.419 1.924 0.076
8 0.373 1.864 0.136
9 0.337 1.816 0.184
10 0.308 1.777 0.223 0.184
Type of variables control chart
– Interval or ratio scaled numerical data
Shows sample ranges over time
– Difference between smallest & largest
values in inspection sample
Monitors variability in process
Example: Weigh samples of coffee
& compute ranges of samples; Plot
R Chart
Sample Range at
Time i
# Samples
From Table
R Chart
Control Limits
n
R
R
R D LCL
R D UCL
i
n
1i
3R
4R
Out-of-control…when?
Process Control Chart
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209
Sample Number
Me
asu
re
Process is Out of Control
UCL
LCL
Average
Shift in Process Average
Process Control Chart
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
Sample Number
Me
as
ure
Process is Out of Control
Trend: 8 or more points moving in the same direction - up or down
UCL
LCL
Average
Process Average Trend Up
7
Process Control Chart
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
Sample Number
Me
as
ure
Process is Out of Control
Nonrandom Patterns Present in the Data
Average
UCL
LCL
Process Control Chart
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
Sample Number
Me
as
ure
Process is Out of Control
Nonrandom Patterns Present in the Data
UCL
LCL
Average
Signals of Control Problems
A point outside the control limits
7 or more points in a row above or below the average (center-line) Shift
8 or more points in a row moving in the same direction, up or down. Trend
Nonrandom patterns in the data
Use Common sense and Good Judgment
Using X and R Process Control Charts
Situation: Boise Cascade is interesting in monitoring the
length of logs that arrive at a mill yard. In the long run, they
want the average to be 18 feet and the variation should
continue to decline
The process output measure is length of the logs.
An X and R chart will be developed to monitor the
log lengths.
Developing and R Charts
Define Process Measurement of Interest
Determine Subgroup (sample) size (3-6)
Determine data gathering methods
where, how, who
Determine number of subgroups (20-30)
Collect Data
Compute X and R for each subgroup
Plot X and R on separate charts
Compute Control Limits
Draw Control Limits and Centerline on Charts
X
Log length Example: Data 30 days (subgroups) -- subgroup size = 4
Day Log Length (feet)
1 2 3 4
1 16 18 21 23
2 26 20 19 19
3 20 22 18 18
4 24 16 22 20
5 17 19 24 17
6 17 17 15 18
7 22 12 20 22
8 24 19 19 17
9 18 18 20 14
10 17 23 19 15
11 20 20 17 21
12 21 17 21 23
13 22 17 22 17
14 16 19 18 19
15 17 18 15 23
8
Log Length Data (continued)
Day Log Length (feet)
1 2 3 4
16 19 17 21 17
17 19 19 13 16
18 21 14 17 16
19 18 17 25 18
20 20 18 20 19
21 23 21 23 21
22 20 20 20 14
23 18 18 26 15
24 20 22 23 21
25 23 22 21 24
26 22 14 21 19
27 18 20 18 22
28 19 20 16 14
29 21 19 16 20
30 22 22 19 21
Compute X for Each Subgroup
n
X =
X
Where:
X = the values in
the subgroups
n = subgroup size
First Subgroup:
19.5 = 4
23 + 21 + 18 + 16 = 1X
Compute R for Each Subgroup
R = Subgroup High - Subgroup Low
First Subgroup:
R1 = 23 - 16
= 7
Log Length Example: Data
30 days (subgroups) -- subgroup size = 4
Day Log Length (feet)
1 2 3 4 Average = X Range = R
1 16 18 21 23 19.5 7
2 26 20 19 19 21 7
3 20 22 18 18 19.5 4
4 24 16 22 20 20.5 8
5 17 19 24 17 19.25 7
6 17 17 15 18 16.75 3
7 22 12 20 22 19 10
8 24 19 19 17 19.75 7
9 18 18 20 14 17.5 6
10 17 23 19 15 18.5 8
11 20 20 17 21 19.5 4
12 21 17 21 23 20.5 6
13 22 17 22 17 19.5 5
14 16 19 18 19 18 3
15 17 18 15 23 18.25 8
Log Length Data (continued)
Day Log length (feet)
1 2 3 4 Average = X Range = R
16 19 17 21 17 18.5 4
17 19 19 13 16 16.75 6
18 21 14 17 16 17 7
19 18 17 25 18 19.5 8
20 20 18 20 19 19.25 2
21 23 21 23 21 22 2
22 20 20 20 14 18.5 6
23 18 18 26 15 19.25 11
24 20 22 23 21 21.5 3
25 23 22 21 24 22.5 3
26 22 14 21 19 19 8
27 18 20 18 22 19.5 4
28 19 20 16 14 17.25 6
29 21 19 16 20 19 5
30 22 22 19 21 21 3
Plot of Subgroup Ave ra ge s
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
Subgroup
Su
bg
rou
p A
ve
rag
e
Plot the X Values
9
Plot of R Values (Ranges)
Plot of R Values
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
Subgroup
Ran
ge
(R)
Compute Centerlines for Each Chart
X Chart:
19.25 = 30
577.5 =
k
X =
iX
R = R
k =
171
30 = 5.7
i
R Chart:
Plot of Subgroup Ave ra ge s
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
Subgroup
Su
bg
rou
p A
ve
rag
e
Plot the the Centerline on X Chart
X = 19.25
Plot of R Values
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
Subgroup
Ran
ge
(R)
Plot of Centerline on R Chart
R= 5.7
Compute the Control Limits on the X Chart
Table
n A2 D3 D4
1 2.66
2 1.88 0.0 3.27
3 1.02 0.0 2.57
4 0.73 0.0 2.28
5 0.58 0.0 2.11
6 0.48 0.0 2.00
Compute X Control Limits
n A2 D3 D4
1 2.66
2 1.88 0.0 3.27
3 1.02 0.0 2.57
4 0.73 0.0 2.28
5 0.58 0.0 2.11
6 0.48 0.0 2.00
UCL R = X + = 19.25 + .73(5.7) = 23.412A
LCL = X - = 19.25 - .73(5.7) = 15.092A R
Now Plot the Control Limits on the X Chart
10
Plot of Subgroup Averages
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
Subgroup
Su
bg
ro
up
Av
era
ge
Plot Control Limits on X Chart
X = 19.25
23.41 UCL
LCL 15.09
Compute Control Limits for R Chart
n A2 D3 D4
1 2.66
2 1.88 0.0 3.27
3 1.02 0.0 2.57
4 0.73 0.0 2.28
5 0.58 0.0 2.11
6 0.48 0.0 2.00
UCL = = 2.28(5.7) = 13.004D R
LCL = = 0.00(5.7) = 0.003D R
Plot the Control Limits on R Chart
Plot of R Values
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 3 5 7 9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
Subgroup
Ra
ng
e (
R)
R Chart with Control Limits
13.0
0.0
5.7
UCL
LCL
Utilizing the Control Charts
Continue to Collect Subgroup data
Plot Values to X and R charts
Examine the R Chart First - Then the X Chart
Look for Signals
A point outside the control limits
7 points in a row above or below the centerline
8 points in a row moving in the same direction
any nonrandom patterns
Take action when signal indicates
Update Control limits when appropriate
59
Special Variables Control Charts
x-bar and s charts
x-chart for individuals
Special control charts for variable data X bar and s-Chart
1
)( 2
n
XXS
Sample S.D.
at Time i
# Samples
From Table
n
S S
SB LCL
SB UCL
i
n
1i
3S
4S
sAxx
LCL
sAxx
UCL
3
3
For the associated x-chart, the control limits are derived from the overall standard deviation are:
11
X chart for individuals
2/3
2/3
dRxxUCL
dRxxUCL
RD LCL
RD UCL
3R
4R
Samples of size 1, however, do not furnish enough information for process variability measurement. Process variability can be determined by using a moving average of ranges, or a moving range, of n successive observations. For example, a moving range of n=2 is computed by finding the absolute difference between two successive observations. The number of observations used in the moving range determines the constant d2; hence, for n=2, from appendix b, d2=1.128.
Set of observations measuring the percentage of cobalt in a chemical process
Fraction nonconforming (p-chart) Fixed sample size
Variable sample size
np-chart for number nonconforming
Charts for defects c-chart
u-chart
Charts for Attributes
12
P Charts
Used When the Variable of Interest is an Attribute and
We are Interested in Monitoring the Proportion of Items
in Sample that have this Attribute -
Can accommodate unequal sample sizes.
Sample sizes are usually 50 or greater.
Need 20-30 samples to construct the P-chart. Examples: Proportion of Invoices with errors Proportion of Incorrectly Sorted Logs Proportion of Items Requiring Rework
P Chart Example
Plywood Veneer is graded when it comes out of the
dryer. Sheets that graded incorrectly cause
problems later in the process. Management is
interested in monitoring the rate of incorrectly
graded veneer.
The variable of interest is the proportion of
incorrectly graded veneer.
Each shift, n=100 sheets are selected and evaluated
for grade. The number of mis-grades are
recorded.
P Charts
Step 1:
Collect appropriate data.
Attribute data of the “yes/no” type
A Sheet is inspected. Is it incorrectly graded - Yes or No?
Record the number of “Yes” occurrences
P-Chart Data
P Charts
Step 2:
Calculate the fraction defective for each
subgroup.
The fraction defective is known as the p value:
subgroup theof size
subgroup in the ancesnonconform ofnumber = p
Key Point: The fraction defective is always expressed as a decimal value.
Using the percentage value (i.e. 4.7% rather than .047) will
cause later computations to be inaccurate.
Fraction Nonconformance - p- Values
13
P Charts
Step 3:
Plot the data on a graph.
Plot each p value
Plot of the p-Values
p Charts
Step 4:
Compute the center line for the p chart
and plot on the chart
The center line of the p chart is p
subgroups allin examined items ofnumber total
subgroups allin ancesnonconform ofnumber total = p
215.2,000
429 = p
P-Values and Centerline
CL = .215
p Charts Step 5
If the sample sizes are equal, compute the 3 sigma control limits using the following formulas - plot on control chart:
092.100
)215.1(215.3215.LCL
)-(13 - = LCL
Limit ControlLower
338.100
)215.1(215.3215.UCL
)-(13 + = UCL
Limit Control Upper
n
ppp
n
ppp
P Control Chart
UCL = .338
CL=.215
LCL = .092
14
P Charts
Analyzing p Charts
p charts are analyzed using the standard tests
for special cause variation: A Point located outside the control limits
7 or more points above or below the centerline
8 or more points moving in the same direction
Other evidence of nonrandom patterns
P Charts
Step 5: Alternative - When sample sizes are not equal Compute the 3-sigma upper and lower control limits for the p chart. If the size of the subgroup size varies, the control limit
calculations can be accomplished by two methods:
Compute multiple control limits based on the largest and smallest subgroup sizes
The two sets of control limits are plotted on the p chart. By calculating control limits based on the largest and smallest subgroups, both the narrowest limits (largest subgroup size) and the widest limits (smallest subgroup size) are plotted.
Compute separate control limits for each fraction nonconformance.
p Charts
Using Multiple Control Limits: In analyzing a control chart with multiple limits, it must be clear
that:
Any value plotting outside the widest control limits is considered out of control
Any value plotting inside the narrowest control limits is considered in control
Only those values, if any, which plot between the two upper or two lower control limits raise questions needing further evaluation (calculate their individual limits)
np-Charts for number Nonconforming
The np-chart is a useful alternative to the p-chart because it is often easier to understand for production personnel-the number of nonconforming items is more meaningful than a fraction.
To use the np-chart, the size of each sample must be constant.
15
k
y ....... y y pn n21
)-(13 - n = LCL
Limit ControlLower
)-(13 + n = UCL
Limit Control Upper
pn
pn
ppnp
ppnp
npnp
ppn
/)( ere wh
)-(1 = s
deviation standard theof Estimate
pn
87
Chart for defects
A defect is a single nonconforming characteristics of an item, while a defective refers to an item that has one or more defects.
In some situation, quality assurance personnel mat be interested not only in whether an item is defective but also in how many defects it has. For example, in complex assemblies such as electronics, the number of defects is just as important as whether the product is defective.
The c-chart is used to control the total number of defects per unit when subgroup size is constant. If subgroup sizes are variable, a u-chart is used to control the average number of defects per unit.
c Charts
A c chart is a process control tool for charting and monitoring the number of attributes per unit. Each unit must be like all other units with respect to size, volume, height, or other measurement.
c Charts
Necessary Characteristics Subgroups must be the same size (in practical use, if
they vary less than + 15% from the average it is acceptable to use the average subgroup size to compute the chart)
Subgroup size must be large enough to provide an average of at least 5 nonconformities per subgroup
The attribute of interest is the number of nonconformities per unit
Each unit may have one or more nonconformities
The actual number of nonconformities is small compared with the number of opportunities for nonconformities
16
c Charts
Step 1:
Collect appropriate data.
Attribute data of the “counting” type
Issue is Re-patch requirements.
Subgroup size is 3 sheets of plywood
Variable of interest is the combined number of re-patch spots in the three sheets
C-Chart Example
Boise Cascade Plywood Plant has to re-patch sheets
when knot patches become loose or are missed during
the initial patch line operation. The department is
monitoring the number of re-patches.
3 Sheets are grouped to make sure that the average
number > 5
Re-Patch Data c Charts
Step 2:
Graph the data.
The number of nonconformities is on the vertical axis
The sample number is on the horizontal axis
Plot The Nonconformatives c Charts
Step 3:
Compute the average number and
standard deviation of defects per unit. Average:
Standard deviation:
c = total nonconformities in all samples
number of samples
s c =
17
Compute the Mean and Standard Deviation
Total = 277
33.308.11
08.1125
277
S
C
c Charts
Step 4:
Compute the 3-sigma upper and lower
control limits. Upper Control Limit
Lower Control Limit
08.21)33.3(308.113 + = UCL cc
08.1)33.3(308.113 - = LCL cc
c Charts
Step 5:
Plot the center line, , and the upper and
lower control limits. c
c Control Chart
UCL=21.08
CL=11.08
LCL=1.08
c Charts
Analyzing c Charts The c chart utilizes the standard tests for signaling
when a process is out of control:
Points located outside the control limits
7 or more points above or below the centerline
8 or more points moving in the same direction
Other evidence of nonrandom patterns
c Charts
Common Mistakes Plotting specification limits instead of control limits
Not taking action to determine the special cause when one of the rules for process control has been violated
Not plotting the data immediately after it is collected
Collecting data on defects per unit when the units are not of the same size, height, etc.
Using a desired value to develop control limits rather than actual data from the process
c
18
u-chart
Used when the subgroup size is not constant or the nature of the production process does not yield discrete, measurable units.
For example, suppose that in an auto assembly plant, several different models are produced that vary in surface area. The number of defects will not then be valid comparison among different models.
Other applications, such as the production of textiles, photographic film, or paper, have no convenient set of items to measure. In such cases, a standard unit of measurement is used, such as defects per square foot or defects per square inch. The control chart for these situations is u-chart.
k21
n21
n..........nn
c ....... c c u
iu nus / =
inuu /3 + = UCLu
inu /3 - u = LCLu
105 106
107
Control Chart Selection
Quality Characteristic
variable attribute
n>1?
n>=10 or
computer?
x and MR no
yes
x and s
x and R no
yes
defective defect
constant
sample
size?
p-chart with
variable sample
size
no
p or
np
yes constant
sampling
unit?
c u
yes no
108
Control Chart Design Issues
Basis for sampling
Sample size
Frequency of sampling
Location of control limits
19
109 110
SPC Implementation Requirements
Top management commitment
Project champion
Initial workable project
Employee education and training
Accurate measurement system
111
Process Capability
The range over which the natural variation of a process occurs as determined by the system of common causes
Measured by the proportion of output that can be produced within design specifications
112
Types of Capability Studies
• Peak performance study - how a process performs under ideal conditions
• Process characterization study - how a process performs under actual operating conditions
• Component variability study - relative contribution of different sources of variation (e.g., process factors, measurement system)
113
Process Capability Study
1. Choose a representative machine or process
2. Define the process conditions
3. Select a representative operator
4. Provide the right materials
5. Specify the gauging or measurement method
6. Record the measurements
7. Construct a histogram and compute descriptive statistics: mean and standard deviation
8. Compare results with specified tolerances 114
Process Capability
specification specification
specification specification
natural variation natural variation
(a) (b)
natural variation natural variation
(c) (d)
20
115
Process Capability Index
Cp = UTL - LTL
6
Cpl, Cpu }
UTL -
3
Cpl = - LTL
3
Cpk = min{
Cpu =
Process Capability
Nominal
value
800 1000 1200 Hours
Upper
specification
Lower
specification
Process distribution
(a) Process is capable
Process Capability
Nominal
value
Hours
Upper
specification
Lower
specification
Process distribution
(b) Process is not capable
800 1000 1200
Process Capability
Lower
specification
Mean
Upper
specification
Six sigma
Four sigma
Two sigma
Nominal value
Upper specification = 1200 hours
Lower specification = 800 hours
Average life = 900 hours = 48 hours
Process Capability
Light-bulb Production
Cp = Upper specification - Lower specification
6
Process Capability Ratio
Process Capability
Light-bulb Production Upper specification = 1200 hours
Lower specification = 800 hours
Average life = 900 hours = 48 hours
Cp = 1200 - 800
6(48)
Process Capability Ratio
= 1.39
CP = 1.33 4 Sigma
CP =2.0 6 Sigma
21
Process Capability Analysis
The process is centered at the target of 200 and the Cp = 2.00. All
is well.
Process Capability Analysis
The process has shifted to an average of 205, but Cp is still at 2.00.
Target
Process Capability Analysis
Real problems exist -- the process is centered at 230. Now, even
though Cp = 2.00, much of the output is defective.
Target
Process Capability
Light-bulb Production Upper specification = 1200 hours
Lower specification = 800 hours
Average life = 900 hours = 48 hours
Cp = 1.39
Cpk = Minimum of
Upper specification - x
3
x - Lower specification
3
Process
Capability
Index
,
Process Capability
Light-bulb Production Upper specification = 1200 hours
Lower specification = 800 hours
Average life = 900 hours = 48 hours
Cp = 1.39
Cpk = Minimum of
1200 - 900
3(48)
900 - 800
3(48)
Process
Capability
Index
= .69
=2.08
Process Capability
Light-bulb Production Upper specification = 1200 hours
Lower specification = 800 hours
Average life = 900 hours = 48 hours
Cp = 1.39 Cpk = 0.69
Process
Capability
Index
Process
Capability
Ratio
22
Process Capability
Light-bulb Production Upper specification = 1200 hours
Lower specification = 800 hours
Average life = 900 hours = 48 hours
Cp = 1.39
Cpk = Minimum of
1200 - 900
3(48)
900 - 800
3(48)
Process
Capability
Index
,