79
Resolving the Data Controversies Moderator: Jim Kjolhede, Satteron Enterprises Panelists: David Seiler, Trinity Consultants Darcey Forbes, Essex Property Trust Matthew Kilmurry, The Bozzuto Group

Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Resolving the Data Controversies Since marketers started counting page views and clicks, owners, ILS sites, lead trackers, call centers and others have disagreed about where traffic comes from, what gets counted and what the implications are. We’re going to ask an owners who care about precision to address: persistent attribution errors, shifting definitions of metrics, and the structural problems inherent in using data from different sources to draw conclusions. Our hope is to end some of the whispering campaigns and get some clarity on at least some basic measures of advertising effectiveness and where the data should come from, and how analyzed. - Darcey Forbes, Director of Marketing, Essex Property Trust- David Seiler, Executive Vice President, Trinity Property Consultants- Matthew Kilmurry, Director of Interactive Marketing, The Bozzuto Group

Citation preview

Page 1: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Resolving the Data Controversies

Moderator:Jim Kjolhede, Satteron Enterprises

Panelists:David Seiler, Trinity Consultants

Darcey Forbes, Essex Property TrustMatthew Kilmurry, The Bozzuto Group

Page 2: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Opening Comments

Page 3: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Resolving the Data Controversies(Lead Attribution)

Presented by David SeilerExecutive Vice President

Trinity Property Consultants

Page 4: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

DISCUSSION

Gathering Marketing Data – Then and Now Current Solution Reports, Assumptions, and Analytics New Dynamic & Solutions

Page 5: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

GATHERING MARKETING DATATHEN – THE GUEST CARD

Page 6: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Gathering Marketing DataNow – The Pop Card

Traffic Source is Hard Coded

Page 7: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Gathering Marketing Data

Guest Card• Identifying the source is

suggestive / open to employee and prospect interpretation

• Mostly only 1 source is identified and tracked

• Manually entered into Property Management System

Pop Card• The Source is hard coded

into the contact based on a tracking phone number or e-mail

• System Generated Tracking up to 4 points of contact from different sources

• Fully integrated w/ PMS for more accurate data and reporting.

VS.

Page 8: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Call Tracking Provider

• Tracking phone and email addresses deposits marketing intelligence into 1 comprehensive reporting platform

Page 9: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Call Tracking Provider

• Call recording and e-mail follow up are captured on each Pop Card providing data validation and training opportunities

Page 10: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Report and Analyze• Dashboard • Prospect Reports • Active Prospects • Inactive Prospects • Customer Records • Incoming Traffic Logs • Activity Logs • Performance • Prospects Created • Referrals • Tours • Rentals • Wait List • Trend Reports • Traffic (Summary) • Leads By Day

• Leads By Hr (Bus Hrs) • Leads By Hr (After

Hrs) • Leads By Mo (Last 12

Mos) • Leads By Mo (Last 18

Mos) • Performance • Tours By Day • Campaign Reports • Traffic (Detail) • Leads • Leads Per Day • Leads Per Hr (Bus

Hrs) • Leads Per Hr (After

Hrs)

• Performance • Appointments • Tours • Rentals • Rental Lead

Attribution • Call Analysis • Call Logs • Minutes Of Use • Call Duration • Busy/RNA Per Hr

(Bus Hrs) • Busy/RNA Per Hr

(After Hrs) • Forwarded Call

Summary

Page 11: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Report and AnalyzeTrinity Property Consultants Q1 2011

Traffic Sources Total Leads % of TrafficCraigslist 3961 15.51%Apartment Guide.com 2801 10.97%Yardi Portal 2547 9.97%For Rent.com 2393 9.37%Drive By/Walk In 2246 8.79%Referrals 2115 8.28%For Rent 1538 6.02%Banners/ Signs 1389 5.44%Rent.com 1348 5.28%Apartments.com 1208 4.73%Move.com 873 3.42%Apartment Guide 594 2.33%

Traffic Sources Total Leads % of TrafficApartment Finder 517 2.02%Apartment Finder.com 424 1.66%MyNewPlace.com 398 1.56%Internet Other 337 1.32%Mobile Web 260 1.01%Direct Mail 255 1.00%Print Other 108 0.42%Apartment Ratings.com 102 0.40%Community Blog 65 0.25%Yelp.com 44 0.17%Facebook 17 0.07%

Numbers are based on 55 communities across 10 states. Not every community utilizes every source.

Community Website

Page 12: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Report and AnalyzeTrinity Property Consultants Q1 2011

Total Prospects ProspectsProspects Converted to ConvertedCreated Rentals To Rentals (%)

Referrals 200 11 1150 85 1446 566 39.14%Drive By/Walk In 208 4 1703 105 2020 459 22.72%

Craigslist 2094 19 554 57 2724 307 11.27%For Rent 1712 708 210 33 2663 145 5.44%

Yardi Portal 908 440 9 18 1375 141 10.25%Apartment Guide 1299 854 197 177 2527 133 5.26%

Banners/ Signs 698 0 380 16 1094 93 8.50%Rent.com 295 481 158 16 950 85 8.95%

Apartment Finder 425 212 106 17 760 46 6.05%Apartments.com 330 480 47 4 861 44 5.11%

Move.com 204 368 3 3 578 32 5.54%Internet Other 107 24 28 31 190 26 13.68%

Apartment Ratings.com 53 0 10 2 65 13 20.00%MyNewPlace.com 100 201 0 0 301 8 2.66%

Community Blog 11 23 8 3 45 6 13.33%Yelp 24 0 0 0 24 1 4.17%

Source Calls Emails Walk-Ins Other

Lease are attributed to 1st contact. Not every community utilizes every source.

Community Website

Page 13: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Variables to AssumptionsThe 80/20 Effect

– Active ads must have an active tracking phone number and/or e-mail

– Non-contactors must be sourced correctly– All ads display accurate rental rates, specials,

photos and amenities – Staff is properly trained in sales techniques and

Pop Card management.

Page 14: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

New Dynamics

• Multiple Sources– Tracking Vendor can now attribute up to 4 sources

to one prospect • Lost In The Web

– How do prospects find our community websites?– Where does internet traffic originate from?

Page 15: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Google Analytics

Installing Google Analytics allows us to have greater visibility into traffic behaviors on our Community Websites, Mobile Websites and Community Blogs.

Page 16: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Google Analytics

With data from GA we are able to make smarter choices about website design, optimization, and functionality.

Page 17: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Google Analytics

Together with Tracking Vendor we have great insight into where traffic is generated.

Page 18: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

SummaryLead tracking and lease attribution is not an exact science. Outside forces and changes in the market, pricing, advertisement presentation, consumer trends and advertising partners all force us to look at and overlay assumptions with alternative data. New tracking tools are constantly being developed. As long as the economic efficiencies that the data produces exceeds the cost to produce the data, we will continue to invest in the search.

Page 19: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Questions / Comments

Page 20: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

THANK YOU!!

Page 21: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Resolving the Data Controversies Part II

(Lead Attribution)

Presented by Darcey ForbesDirector of MarketingEssex Property Trust

Page 22: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Surf’s Up : Finding the Right Wave of Success

Reviewing Lead Performance: If you’re going to do it, do it right.

Page 23: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How To Make The Right Marketing Decisions

• Learning the hard way, some things to avoid• How Essex makes marketing decisions today• Moving forward with confidence

Page 24: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Learning The Hard Way – Some Things To Avoid

Page 25: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

The Magic Eight Ball Approach

Page 26: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

#FAIL

Page 27: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations
Page 28: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Learning The Hard Way, Some Things To Avoid

• Don’t rest on faulty data pulled from the wrong places

• Don’t assume your G.L. accounts hold your marketing expenses

• Don’t set it and forget it… measure, measure and measure again

• Don’t jump the gun, leads take time to turn to leases

Page 29: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How Did We Feel About Our Data Woes?

Essex Offices 2009

Page 30: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Don’t Rest On Faulty Data Pulled From The Wrong Places

ILS Cost per Lease

Cost per Lease in

PMS

Actual Cost as a

Percentage of the PMS

Cost

ILS #1 $882 $7,057 13%

ILS #2 $814 $1,422 57%

ILS #3 $480 $880 55%

ILS #4 $1,243 $1,961 63%

ILS #5 $578 $966 60%

ILS #6 $388 $542 72%

ILS #7 $208 $295 71%

Even with:o A centralized management

structure and dedicated marketing team

o Call Center handling all phone calls and emails

o Automatic data insertion into PMS

o Intense on-going training at the site level

A lease report pulled from PMS can still be misleading

Page 31: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Don’t Assume Your G.L. Accounts Hold Your Marketing Expenses

• G.L. account data is often not helpful because of missing data or because the billing period does not match to the dates a service was in use

• Services that are harder to use cost more as they waste valuable time, they cost you time and therefore money

• Free services, such as Craigslist, take time to use, they cost you time and therefore money

Page 32: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How to work out what Craigslist is costing you..Not So Free

• Time per Craigslist post 5 mins

• Posts per property per month 100

• Properties posting 100

• Total posts per month 10,000

• Total time spent posting per month 50,000 mins. / 833 hours

• Average hourly rate for leasing agent $15

• Cost of posting per month $12,495

• Cost per Property $125

Page 33: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Don’t Set It And Forget It… Measure, Measure And Measure Again

01-2010 02-2010 03-2010 04-2010 05-2010 06-2010 07-2010 08-2010 09-2010 10-2010 11-2010 12-2010Property #A $207 $207 $178 $107 $249 $96 $83 $156 $355 $113 $249 $104

• Prospect behavior, websites, search engines and even the seasons change your marketing effectiveness; your marketing decisions need to change with them

• The cost per contactor for one property, on the same ILS, within one year, can fluctuate by more than 400%

Page 34: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Don’t jump the gun, leads take time to turn to leases

1-11 11-21 21-31 31-41 41-51 51-61 61-71 71-81 81-91 91-101 More than 100

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Days Between the First Lead and Move In

Percentage of AllLeases Signed

* Sample from Essex Property Trust properties across a range of ad sources during 2010

Page 35: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How Essex Makes Marketing Decisions Today

Page 36: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How Essex Makes Marketing Decisions Today

• Make sure the data is accurate, complete and consistently measured

• Focus on a few consistent metrics across all ad sources for a fair analysis

• Trust the data

Page 37: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Phone2,511

2.9%

Email4,038All Raw Leads

1.7%

Total Leases: 69 73

Total Cost: $105,563

Total Matched Leases: 142

Total Cost per Matched Lease: $743

Data From ILS Analysis

Make sure the data is accurate, complete and consistently measured

Focus on a few consistent metrics acrossall ad sources

Trust the data

From the ILSs

From matching process

From matching process

Page 38: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

A brief history of tracking

PMS Reports

Call trackingResults…• Visibility into the call volumes coming from specific ad

sources• Removes some reliance on resident testimony

Call CenterResults…• More accurate ad source information on calls and emails• Efficiency at the site level and focus on in-person customers

Name MatchingResults…• Even more complete picture of the leasing sales funnel• Side-by-side comparison of ad sources

Page 39: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Moving Forward With Confidence

Page 40: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Get Accurate Data And Really Use It

• Make sure the data is accurate, complete and consistently measured by avoiding data pitfalls

• Focus on a few consistent metrics across all ad sources for a fair analysis

• Trust the data

Page 41: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How to resolve conflicting data and make decisions

• Summarize the data

• Communicate the findings to all stakeholders

• Implement changes to marketing spends based on the data

Page 42: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations
Page 43: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

THANK YOU!!

Page 44: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Resolving Data Controversies Part III

Matthew KilmurryDirector of Interactive Marketing

The Bozzuto Group

Page 45: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Let’s Start Downstream

Page 46: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Property Management Systems

Rent Rolls and Pricing

Page 47: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

Prospect Tracking and Data Extension

Page 48: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Content Management SystemsCorporate and Property Websites

Page 49: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Internet Listing Services

Page 50: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Logo Overload

Page 51: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Customer relationship management (CRM) is a strategy for managing a company’s interactions with customers, clients and

sales prospects. It involves using technology to organize, automate, and synchronize business processes — principally sales activities.

Page 52: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Insight Into Bozzuto Lead Generation

Rank Portfolio: Average leads per property 2010

1 (1) Bozzuto 275.02 (263)

2 Portfolio A 267.14

3 Portfolio B 175.47

** Average 137.60 (123)

4 Portfolio C 118.40

5 Portfolio D 115.12

6 Portfolio E 110.88

7 Portfolio F 98.18

8 Portfolio G 97.95

9 Portfolio H 51.89

Page 53: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Email25.2%

Phone50.4%

Walk-in24.5%

Percentage of Lead Type

Lead2Lease Portfolio

Email23.4%

Phone 64.6%

Walk-in11.9%

Bozzuto Portfolio

Page 54: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Conversion Rates by Contact Type

* Data from 192,535 inquiries through Lead2Lease during the 3rd quarter 2010

Email3.6%

Phone1.5%

Walk-in17.1%

Page 55: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Matthew Kilmurry

Page 56: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Matthew Kilmurry

Page 57: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Matthew Kilmurry

Page 58: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Unpacking the Data

Page 59: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

A CRM System is NOT an Ad Tracking System

Page 60: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Swimming Upstream

Page 61: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Typical Behavior During ResearchSearching

Internet Listing Services

Social Media

Property WebsiteBozzuto.com

Page 62: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Sourcing Online Leads

Phone Call

Contact FormReservation (VaultWare)

Page 63: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Inbound Calls Create New Guestcards

Matthew Kilmurry

Page 64: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Dynamic Number Rewrite

Page 65: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Reducing General Website Category

Apartment Ratings (11.1.10-4.29.11)Phone Leads: 491Walk In: 15Email: 1Leases: 7Conversion Ratio: 1.38%

Page 66: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Tracking Contact Form Submissions

ReservationContact Us Form (Bozzuto.com and Property Website)

Ad Tracking Solutions

Page 67: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Click Thru Versus View Thru

Impressions: 1,021,385Clicks: 2,894Click Thru Leads: 145Conversion Rate: 5%

View Thru Leads: 474Percent View Thru: 75%

Total Leads: 619Conversion Rate: 21%

Page 68: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Click Thru Versus View Thru

Impressions: 2,162,284Clicks: 4,097Click Thru Leads: 146Conversion Rate: 3.5%

View Thru Leads: 621Percent View Thru: 80%

Total Leads: 767Conversion Rate: 19%

Page 69: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Installing Tracking Pixels on Listing Pages

Page 70: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Multi-Touch Attribution Conversion Tracking

Page 71: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Cookie Retention Rate

Page 72: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Privacy Fears

Page 73: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Cookies Are Everywhere

Page 74: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Resolving Data Controversies

Page 75: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

How To Track Walk-Ins? RFID Chips Are The Future

Scars Mostly HealMinimally Invasive

Page 76: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

[email protected]/In/MKilmurry

Page 77: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

THANK YOU!!

Page 78: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Moderator Questions to the

Panelists

Page 79: Resolving the Data Controversies - 3 Presentations

Audience Questions to the

Panelists