12
New gTLD Market Evolution Simulations for gTLD Market Competition Kenny Huang, Ph.D. Executive Council, APNIC Board Director, TWNIC New gTLD Review Group [email protected]

New gTLD market evolution

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Assessing new gTLD competition by using Monte Carlo Simulation

Citation preview

Page 1: New gTLD market evolution

New gTLD Market Evolution

Simulations for gTLD Market Competition

Kenny Huang, Ph.D. Executive Council, APNIC

Board Director, TWNIC

New gTLD Review Group

[email protected]

Page 2: New gTLD market evolution

Value of gTLD

2

Top search engine rankings of the domain name Thereby to a high number of visitors Count as significant traffic

High ROI

Page 3: New gTLD market evolution

Concentration Ratio

3

CR4 : Four-Firm Concentration Ratio measures the total market share of the four largest firms in an industry

CR4 Concentration Ratio Market Competition

CR4=0 % Perfect competition

CR4=100% Monopoly

80% < CR4 < 100% From oligopoly to monopoly

50% < CR4 < 80% Oligopoly

0% < CR4 < 50% From perfect competition to oligopoly

Page 4: New gTLD market evolution

Legitimate gTLD CR4

4

97.99% 98.01% 98.09% 98.21%

98.34% 98.37% 98.39%

95.00%

95.50%

96.00%

96.50%

97.00%

97.50%

98.00%

98.50%

99.00%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

CR4 : Four-Firm Concentration Ratio measures the total market share of the four largest firms in an industry

eu mobi asia

com/net/org/info

tel

Infringe NTIA agreement & ICANN Core Value “promote and sustain a competitive environment”

Concentration R

atio

Page 5: New gTLD market evolution

ICANN New gTLD Updated

5

1930

1409

1155

applications

gTLD names

applicants

34%

6%

4% 3%

53%

Brand

IDN

Community

Geographic

Generic

How does competition affect the market? given that 1409 gTLDs successfully delegated Design Assumption: Total gTLD domains : 140,667,491 (2013 Jan) Previous gTLD penetration : 250K – 750K DUM (Domain Under Management) in the 1st year New gTLD names : 1409 New gTLD DUM : designed by probability distribution

Page 6: New gTLD market evolution

Back-End Suppliers

6

358

333

305

236

161

101 95 86

60 58

27 27 23 23 21 16

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

CR4=63.83%

Page 7: New gTLD market evolution

Perceived New gTLD Evolution

7

Legitimate gTLD

Post New gTLD

ƒ (DUM)

DUM

Page 8: New gTLD market evolution

8

New gTLD Market Penetration Scenario 20% High Penetration : 250K-750K DUM/gTLD 80% Low Penetration : 5K-250K DUM/gTLD

Monte Carlo Simulation A:

50% < CR4 < 65%

Page 9: New gTLD market evolution

9

New gTLD Market Penetration Scenario 10% High Penetration : 250K-750K DUM/gTLD 90% Low Penetration : 5K-250K DUM/gTLD

Monte Carlo Simulation B:

57% < CR4 < 78%

Page 10: New gTLD market evolution

10

New gTLD Market Penetration Scenario 20% High Penetration : 100K-250K DUM/gTLD 80% Low Penetration : 5K-100K DUM/gTLD

Monte Carlo Simulation C:

67% < CR4 < 81%

Page 11: New gTLD market evolution

11

New gTLD Market Penetration Scenario 10% High Penetration : 100K-250K DUM/gTLD 90% Low Penetration : 5K-100K DUM/gTLD

Monte Carlo Simulation D:

79% < CR4 < 89%

Page 12: New gTLD market evolution

Implications

• Market competition

– gTLD market will likely be oligopoly competition after new gTLDs enter the market

• Name space expansion

– Magnitude of growth of total name space proven not to exist

– Name space maintains incremental growth pace.

• Registry business

– Majority of new gTLD registries will inevitably deal with cash flow shortfalls.

– Exit plans may be exercised ahead of time for some registries.

• Large back-end suppliers are major beneficiaries from the new gTLD policy

12