13
3/19/14 1 Presented by: To: Date: Scott Baker, NY State Coordinator, Public Banking Institute [email protected] Occupy: Alternate Banking Group March 23, 2014 1. The Budget Problem 2. Why A Public Bank? 3. What Can Be Done The Budget Problem “We don’t have the money!” An all too familiar refrain. Options have been limited to: • Cut spending • Raise taxes • Sell off public assets This argument is getting old!

Return to prosperity With Comments

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Handouts to accompany slideshow Return to Prosperity

Citation preview

Page 1: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

1

Presented by:

To: Date:

Scott Baker, NY State Coordinator, Public Banking Institute [email protected] Occupy: Alternate Banking Group March 23, 2014

1. The Budget Problem

2. Why A Public Bank?

3. What Can Be Done

The Budget Problem

“We don’t have the money!”

An all too familiar refrain.

Options have been limited to: • Cut spending • Raise taxes • Sell off public assets

This argument is getting old!

meenakshibaker
Text Box
This presentation is in three parts.
Page 2: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

2

The Budget Problem

Federal Option is off the table.

Wall Street Journal, January 8, 2011: “We have no expectation or intention to get

involved in state and local finance,” Mr. Bernanke said in testimony before the Senate Budget Committee. The states, he said later,

“should not expect loans from the Fed.“

In January 2009, President Obama said the Fed might bail out hard-hit state and municipal governments. But the Fed says they are on their own.

The Budget Problem Federal Option is off the table

NO RESCUE FOR YOU!

$191B would Rescue all the states… $16T has gone to the banks - 2012 audit of the Federal Reserve

The Budget Problem

“We don’t have the money!”

Solutions have been limited to: • Cutting spending • Raising taxes • Selling off public assets

No federal rescue.

But now, there’s a new option: • Invest in our own citizens

The public can own its own bank!

meenakshibaker
Text Box
Actually, the Federal Reserve CANNOT legally involve itself in buying up state, municipal, or city debt, even if it wanted to.
meenakshibaker
Text Box
$16T, based on summer 2012 audit of the Federal Reserve, revealed by Senator Bernie Sanders, among others. …Or, $29T if revolving loans are counted, according to L. Randall Wray of the University of Missouri – these loans have never been repaid, just rolled over - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/l-randall-wray/bernankes-obfuscation-con_b_1147291.html
Page 3: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

3

Why A Bank?

Community banks

Dividends

(Interest)

meenakshibaker
Text Box
Which system is more risky? Don’t forget community banks! In North Dakota, which has the country’s only State Bank, there hasn’t been a bank failure in over 20 years. Nationwide, there have been over 500 bank failures just since 2000 (FDIC). For a city-based Public Bank, substitute “City” for “State” and add Community Banks in between City Bank and City Projects. Source: Center for the Study of Innovation report on State Bank possibilities in Washington State.
meenakshibaker
Text Box
The Public Banking Story is also a Community Bank story. Notice how lending by North Dakota’s community banks has pulled away from that of otherwise comparable states, even during the crisis years! It’s not just oil & gas: Fracking did not significantly increase production in North Dakota until 2005, and loans per capita were higher than comparable states well before then. From the Center for State Innovation - State Bank Legislative Guide, pg. 59: “It seems likely that larger, mostly out of state, banks were the big loan generators for the oil and gas exploration companies as they ramped up operations in the state; thus the effect on smaller, in-state banks (the Bank of North Dakota’s target partners) was minimal….CSI analysis shows that banks in North Dakota reduced lending 33%-45% less than comparable states, and we believe that this is in no small part due to the stabilizing effects of its state bank.”
meenakshibaker
Text Box
I’m going to approach Public Banking a bit differently today, by looking at community banking first…
Page 4: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

4

A typical Systemically Important Financial Institution (SIFI) like JP Morgan has just a 31% Loan to Asset ratio – less than ½ of ND’s community banks. SIFIs don’t make most of their money by making loans!

The States with the Most Community Banks Generally have the fewest Foreclosures…and Vice Versa

Foreclosure Rates for the U.S. January 2014 U.S.: 1 in every 1058

Worst 5 States: Florida: 1 in every 346 Nevada: 1 in every 533 Maryland: 1 in every 543 Illinois: 1 in every 603 New Jersey: 1 in every 619

Best 5 States: North Dakota: 1 in 106,489 Vermont: 1 in 26,854 Mississippi: 1 in 13,851 Nebraska: 1 in 12,654 Montana: 1 in 10,698

meenakshibaker
Text Box
Banks with low levels of loans to asset ratios, like JPMorgan Chase & Co., where loans are 31% of assets, have more diversified sources of revenue, including from investment banking, asset management, and derivatives. Source: http://www.valueline.com/Tools/Educational_Articles/Stocks/Getting_To_Know_A_Bank_With_Financial_Ratios.aspx The TBTF banks are called Systemically Important Financial Institutions by the Fed and the FSB, but “important” to whom, and for what reasons???
meenakshibaker
Text Box
Again, the Public Banking case is the Community Bank case. States with low community bank per capita ratios, like California, Florida, Nevada, and to a somewhat lesser extent, New York (mollified somewhat because of the unique nature of New York City), all had high foreclosure rates. States with lots of community banks per capita, like South Dakota, Minnesota, and most especially, North Dakota, the only state with a Public Bank, had low foreclosure rates. None of the 5 worst states have more than 47% (Illinois) community banks. None of the 5 best states have less than 45% (Mississippi) community banks. But North Dakota has 4X lower foreclosure rate than the next best state, Vermont. It also has the most community banks per capita (81%), and a State Public Bank! The best of both worlds! Sources: U.S. Real Estate Trends & Market Info - http://www.realtytrac.com/statsandtrends/foreclosuretrends
Page 5: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

5

Small Banks are Disappearing Common definition: Total assets < $1 billion

The Big Banks get Bigger…but do not increase their Percentage of Loans to the Community

Small Banks’ Share of Assets Continues to Decline

  The largest 25 domestically chartered banks in the country control about two-thirds of all the assets held by domestically chartered banks.

  There were 2,118 U.S. banks with less than $100 million of assets at Sept. 30, 2013, down from more than 3,000 at the end of 2008 - FDIC

"Fifteen years ago, the assets of the six largest banks in this country totaled 17 percent of GDP…The assets of the six largest banks in the United States today total 63 percent of GDP.” Senator Sherrod Brown on Sunday, April 25th, 2010 in an interview on ABC’s "This Week.”

meenakshibaker
Text Box
OK, small banks are good for the community. So, how have they been faring? Small banks have consolidated and disappeared due to regulations, acquisitions, and (some) economies of scale, but mostly bankruptcies. Source: FDIC Report - community_banking_by_the_numbers_clean-1.pdf
meenakshibaker
Text Box
The Loan to Asset Ratio is only getting worse for the Big Banks, even while they soak up more and more assets. What is all that money good for?
meenakshibaker
Text Box
The number of small banks has continued to plummet since 2009. A recent American Banker article called the community bank model “not sustainable” - http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/what-small-banks-can-learn-from-the-us-postal-service-1066302-1.html Sources: http://seekingalpha.com/article/310644-while-small-banks-disappear-big-banks-get-bigger http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2013/09/13/too-big-to-fail-banks/ http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/179_35/ranks-of-tiny-banks-shrinking-as-challenges-mount-1065734-1.html
Page 6: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

6

And what do these Big Banks do with the Bulk of their Assets?

The biggest banks are now even bigger than ever.

Are they still Too Big To Fail…or will they actually Fail next time?

The operations of the TBTF banks have been compared to a Casino, but this is unfair…to Casinos! In a Casino, you have consistent rules, and if you go bust, you don’t get bailed out, you get thrown out.

New option: Create a state-owned bank

North Dakota owns its own bank – and therefore it creates its own credit.

As a result, North Dakota’s options are to: • Expand public services • Lower taxes • Increase their bank’s capital, to make even more credit available to the people of North Dakota

No need for a federal rescue.

meenakshibaker
Text Box
From the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency: Just in case you have forgotten what kinds of things the TBTF banks are speculating upon…Note the multi-trillion dollar notional value of derivatives of the top 9 banks trading in that space. Don’t forget to add 6 zeros. The Total Credit Exposure to Capital of the Big 5 banks is greater than 100%. Even with hedging, assuming it is working – a bad assumption in the last crisis – it would only take a 5% default in such a large portfolio of derivatives to completely wipe out the Large Banking sector. Source: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 3 qtr, 2013 report: http://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/capital-markets/financial-markets/trading/derivatives/dq313.pdf The TOTAL size of the Derivatives market? As high as $1.2 Quadrillion: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/06/09/risk-quadrillion-derivatives-market-gdp/ Think about this the next time a large commercial bank says there’s no need for a State Bank because they have “everything under control.” Where do you think the state’s money is safer?
meenakshibaker
Text Box
Does anyone still believe the TBTF Money Center Banks (SIFIs) are a safe place to store the public’s money? (A show of hands)
meenakshibaker
Text Box
If the current system is systemically dangerous, what can we do?
Page 7: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

7

The North Dakota experience:

• State-owned bank established 1919 • State budget surpluses 2008-2009 • Lowest unemployment in U.S. • Lowest foreclosure rate • The most local banks per capita • No bank failures in over 20 years* • Bank funds economic growth, from Main Street to high tech to oil production

* Proper risk analysis should include more than that for the Public Bank itself.  North Dakota has had no bank failures in over 20 years, while there were 517 bank failures through the end of Sept, 2013 nationwide since 2000, says the cash-strapped FDIC, which has to pick up the pieces.

Why a Public Bank? Profit the People

• The Bank of North Dakota (BND) earns 20+% annual

return on equity by investing within the state.

• BND’s profits ($300M over 10 years) go to the state treasury, reducing tax burdens while supporting public services.

Why are our tax dollars supporting Wall Street?

Why not invest in-state? For education? Higher education? Renewable energy? Tech startups? Infrastructure?

Rating and Staffing: Learning from the Bank of North Dakota

•  Standard & Poor's (S&P) maintained Bank of North Dakota's (BND) credit ratings in its latest review of the Bank released July 23, 2013. Its long-term issuer credit rating remained "AA-" and its short-term issuer credit rating to "A-1+”

•  What about “key man” risk? What is the risk of key executives leaving and what does that portend for the safety of the bank? Maybe this is an over-rated fear. While Jamie Dimon makes millions running JP Morgan Chase, the president of the Bank of North Dakota – a Civil Servant - earns about $300 thousand a year. Which is the safer, better-run bank?

JP Morgan recently paid over $20 billion in fines for multiple Civil violations (not criminal…so far). The BND has never been found guilty of securities or bank fraud.

What are we paying for?

meenakshibaker
Text Box
It’s not just an oil & gas story: Other similar states, like Alaska, have oil too, but also more than double the unemployment – Alaska’s unemployment in 2012 was 7.1%, North Dakota’s was 3.1% North Dakota’s oil/gas boom started in 2005. In the 1990s, with crude oil and farm prices continuing to fall, the state's chamber of commerce, the Greater North Dakota Association, undertook a statewide effort of town meetings and planning sessions to create a strategy to improve North Dakota's future. The state was actually LOSING per capita income until they set up an aggressive BND-sponsored development program in the 1990s -- and it worked: In 1991 the state legislature passed a $21 million budget for economic development for the period 1991 to 1993. This amount was four times larger than any previous development budget (Department of Economic Development & Finance). The funds came from earnings of the state-owned Bank of North Dakota. This economic development legislative package was a set of policies and programs that was known as “Growing North Dakota" (Patrie). Sources: http://banknd.nd.gov/about_BND/prairie_public_history_of_BND/growing_north_dakota.html
meenakshibaker
Text Box
Definition of 'Return On Equity - ROE' The amount of net income returned as a percentage of shareholders equity. Return on equity measures a corporation's profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested. ROE is expressed as a percentage and calculated as:Return on Equity = Net Income/Shareholder's EquityShareholders, in the case of the Bank of North Dakota, are the taxpayers, since they are where almost all of the deposits come from, in the form of taxes. Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/returnonequity.asp#ixzz2CxwjEqGw
meenakshibaker
Text Box
California is alone at the bottom at A-minus and is the only state to dip to the worst possible rating, BBB, during a recent 11-year period. That happened in 2003, during a state budget crisis so severe that then-Gov. Gray Davis was recalled. The highest rating California achieved during the period, A-plus, came in 2006, at the height of a speculative housing boom that then went bust. New York State has a AA to AAA rating on its debt, about what the Bank of North Dakota has for itself. Additional questions: Are ratings agencies reliable? What was their record during the crisis? When they were giving California an A-plus rating in 2006, did they predict they would lower it to A-minus just a few years (2012) later? If not, can we believe anything they say? Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/07/california-has-nations-worst-credit-rating-pew-study-finds.html Sources: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/01/jpmorgan-jamie-dimon-raise-regulators, http://banknd.nd.gov/financials_and_compliance/credit_rating.html, http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
Page 8: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

8

Why a Public Bank?

Invest in Our Own Citizens

Meanwhile, public pension funds in most states have lost billions of dollars.

What if these funds were used to own a state bank?

And invested in their own citizens, as North Dakota does?

What are Our Assets Right Now? Check the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports…

  $164 billion in NY State Net Assets Restricted for Pensions and other Purposes (March, 2013 CAFR)

  $139 Billion in NY City Net Assets Restricted for Benefits Payments (June, 2013 CAFR)

  There are 10s of billions in other liquid funds too

What if 10% of these liquid funds were reallocated to a Public Bank?*

OK, these assets are not quite a Money Tree, but they are money that can be loaned into the community, often with higher expectations of return than investments on Wall Street. Remember: it is not under-funding that hurts pension fund reliability, it is under-performance and volatility.

* By comparison, the Bank of North Dakota has only $6.4B in assets.

Other Municipalities are Investigating Alternate Investment strategies

  22 States* are considering some form of State Banking Legislation – and many municipalities are too. Many of these proposals look to fund a Public Bank with State and city funds.

•  By law, all taxes from North Dakota and the Chickasaw Indian Nation Banc2 in Oklahoma, go first to these regions’ Public Banks.

•  Philadelphia, PA is considering a Public Bank.

Existing Public Banks in Green: North Dakota: Bank of North Dakota Oklahoma: Chickasaw-owned Bank2 of Oklahoma City.

Is it a better local fiscal solution to reallocate some existing funds into a Public Bank?

* http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/10/01/should-states-operate-public-banks/many-states-see-the-potential-of-public-banking - citing the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)

meenakshibaker
Text Box
These rainy day and pension funds – detailed in CAFRs – total 10s of trillions, nationwide. They could be partly invested in Public Banks, eliminating the need to float a bond to form a bank, adding even more debt. The assets of pension funds swing wildly due to market gyrations. In New York State alone, the pension fund has gone from $156 billion (2007) to just $110 billion a year later (2008), and then back to where it started - $153 billion, at the end of 2011 - all while pensioners required only $4.5 - $8.9 billion, net of contributions. It’s the investments that cause havoc, not the demands for outlays! Sources: http://www.osc.state.ny.us/finance/index.htm, http://comptroller.nyc.gov/reports/comprehensive-annual-financial-reports/ The Vermont Chapter of the Public Banking Institute has made progress: Vermont’s Senate Bill 204 would expand the Vermont Economic Development Authority (VEDA) to become a state bank and would start out by depositing 10% of Vermont’s unrestricted money into the state bank. The bank would be able toleverage this money by means available only to banks to bolster the economy of the state and cut down on the interest payments and fees that are presently paid to out-of-state financial institutions and other entities.The bank would not engage in retail banking and would not compete with community banks; it would work with community banks to maintain their viability and expand their ability to help create better economic outcomes for Vermonters by partnering with them in projects they would not be able to engage in on their own. In a show of direct democracy that also exposed the citizenry's desire for a more localized and responsible banking system, fifteen of nineteen towns passed the resolution during 'Town Meeting Day'— an annual event in which voters choose local officials, approve municipal budgets, and make their voices heard on a number of measures.
meenakshibaker
Text Box
Sources: Detroit is Not Broke: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Detroit-is-Not-Broke-by-Scott-Baker-130805-986.html See also the article and video about funding a Public Bank for Philadelphia here: http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Using-Existing-Government-by-Scott-Baker-Banking-Crisis_Banks_Public-Banking_Public-Banks-140119-408.html
Page 9: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

9

Why a Public Bank?

Free up Funds

• Banks have unlimited low-interest credit lines with the Fed

• States and municipal governments have no credit line with the Fed

So they must create large “rainy day funds”— public money that sits, earning little interest.

Why a Public Bank? Level the Playing Field

Federal law and the banking system give banks huge advantages and place states at a financial disadvantage.

•  Banks borrow at rates as low as 0.2% (overnight Fed funds rate) to 1.27% (6-month CD)

•  States borrow at much higher rates Our state is paying too much for credit.

•  Banks face new regulatory & compliance issues with Dodd-Frank. A State Public Bank could help community banks comply.

Why a Public Bank?

Control Rising Credit Costs

• States are now hit with lower credit ratings, making borrowing even more expensive

• A year ago, California was rated BBB, barely higher than bankrupt Greece

What is OUR state’s credit rating? New York’s rating is AA+ to AA– (2013)

meenakshibaker
Text Box
There is $71 billion in a single California Treasury “rainy day fund” alone (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-brown/the-mysterious-cafrs-how_b_585011.html) that could be invested in a state bank, creating opportunities and jobs. How bad is it?: In 2012, California had a $17 billion deficit, owed the federal government $14 billion, and owed the California public school system $10 billion. Bloomberg: California and its localities have paid out 8.9% this year (2012), according to S&P data.
meenakshibaker
Text Box
States with poor credit can pay as much as 9% for money they borrow, all while the commercial banks that hold the State’s tax revenues, invest everywhere BUT the State – e.g. overseas, in risky bonds (some below investment grade), even in shorts and options! Also, Dodd-Frank has, ironically, made life harder for community banks and easier for the Largest Banks. Dodd-Frank Law has made the process of mortgage origination much more complex and costly for community banks. These banks approached the BND about helping with this process which the BND has agreed to provide. The result is that the community banks can make mortgage loans without having to absorb the added costs and burdens required by the Dodd-Frank law. If not for this assistance, some of these banks might have stopped doing mortgages.
Page 10: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

10

Why a Public Bank?

Urgent Need: Affordable Credit

What about municipal governments? Don’t they borrow by issuing bonds?

Yes, at “market rates”— but these rates are being driven up, increasing the cost of money.

The issue is not just available credit, but affordable credit.

What Can Be Done?

What Can Be Done

Today, state and local governments are:

• Investing their capital (pension funds), and • Depositing their tax revenues (our money!) on Wall Street

Translation: They are handing over their huge credit generating power to the same big banks that got us into this mess in the first place.

They are investing in Wall Street, not Main Street.

Does this make sense to you?

meenakshibaker
Text Box
Usury – In law, the crime of charging an unlawfully high rate of interest. In Old English law, the taking of any compensation whatsoever was termed usury. With the expansion of trade in the 13th century, the demand for credit increased, necessitating a modification in the definition of the term. In 1545 England fixed a legal maximum interest, a practice later followed by other Western nations. Generally, anything above 8% has historically been considered usury….and states like California are paying 8.9%!
Page 11: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

11

What Can Be Done Banking in the Public Interest

Deposits begin the creation of credit in a bank. This credit is an asset of the bank.

If a state deposits funds in a Wall Street bank, it is giving away its power to create credit.

This credit rightfully belongs to the public, not to private banks.

Our state and cities should be managing that credit in a public bank—serving the public interest by investing in our own Main Street.

What Can Be Done

Invest in Main Street Through a Public Bank

• Keeps our tax money working within the state, city, or borough

• Keeps our credit from leaving the state, city, or borough

• Strengthens our community banks

• Demonstrates that our elected officials are working for us and not for Wall Street • Helps our communities return to prosperity in

a nonpartisan way

Recap: Solution Choices

• Raise taxes

• Cut services

• Sell assets • Invest in our own citizens by creating a public bank

There are no other choices.

Will we continue having our tax payments sent to Wall Street banks?

What Can Be Done

meenakshibaker
Text Box
There are other choices at the Federal level, but states are limited by: 1. Being constitutionally obligated to balance their budgets every year 2. Being unable to “coin Money” under Article 1, Section 8, as the Federal Government can.
meenakshibaker
Text Box
We could easily create a Public Bank of Manhattan, or Brooklyn, or…. It could be larger than the Bank of North Dakota.
Page 12: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

12

What Can Be Done

Next Steps

Refine and pass a resolution: “Return to prosperity by forming a state-owned bank.”

Tell your state representative that keeping tax revenues in our state is vital—an urgent need.

Find “natural allies” to speak with one voice for public banking in the public interest.

Natural Allies

•  Community leaders whose budgets are being gutted by the state

•  Enlightened legislators

•  Enlightened Media & Reporters

•  Public employees and unions faced with state and city budget cuts: teachers, firefighters, construction workers, etc.

•  Community bankers wanting to originate loans

•  Unemployed and under-employed people

•  Small business owners burdened by high credit card APRs to pay for inventory

•  Activist groups like Occupy Alt.banking

Research, Approach, Petition (RAP)   R - Join online groups:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/public-banking (219 members) and https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/pbivolunteers (141 members) https://www.facebook.com/groups/publicbanking/ (236 members)

  R - Download this slideshow: http://www.slideshare.net/ScottOnTheSpot/return-to-prosperity and http://www.slideshare.net/ScottOnTheSpot/return-to-prosperity-6-slides-per-page

  R - Begin a study of benefits of a Public Bank in your community, city, state, compare funding alternatives and current investments (will require experts!).

  A - Hold a Press Conference or public event: https://vimeo.com/68244964

  A - Cultivate the Press: “What North Dakota’s Public Bank Does for Small Businesses” http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/13/what-north-dokotas-public-bank-does-for-small-businesses/

  P - Demand that your Assembly Member, City Council member, State Senator, support Public Banking. 10 co-sponsors already support the Sandy Galef bill, above. Get them to sign the Resolution in favor of the bill in the Files section of this Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/publicbanking/

  P - Sign onto the petition to support a State Public Bank - study bill A01696 - and gather more signatures: http://www.change.org/petitions/support-a-public-state-bank-for-new-york-state A thousand signatures hand-delivered in each district would make a big difference!

meenakshibaker
Text Box
What else can be done…?
Page 13: Return to prosperity With Comments

3/19/14

13

Approach Members of the Banking Committee to Co-Sponsor the Galef Bill: A01696

New York State Assembly Banking Committee: http://assembly.state.ny.us/comm/?sec=mem&id=4

Chair: Annette Robinson Members: Peter Abbate; Jr. Joseph Borelli; Karim Camara; Brian Curran; Patricia Fahy; Andrew Garbarino; Mark Gjonaj; Michael Kearns; Micah Kellner; William Magee; Nicole Malliotakis; Michael Miller Walter Mosley; N. Nick Perry; Andrew Raia; Robert Rodriguez; Gabriela Rosa; Sean Ryan; William Scarborough; Luis Sepúlveda; Aravella Simotas; Dan Stec; Claudia Tenney; Raymond Walter; Harvey Weisenberg; David Weprin

All Co-Sponsors: O'Donnell; Steck; Rosenthal; Mosley; Skartados; Quart; Buchwald; Gottfried; Jacobs; Mayer

Approached in Red Agreed to Co-Sponsor in Green

meenakshibaker
Text Box
How will the members in Red react when a thousand-signature petition is presented to them? Will they turn Green?