Upload
latitude-insights
View
108
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presented at the MRSS conference in Singapore 2009
Citation preview
Losing Control in Qualitative Research(and why it’s really not so bad)
Today we’re going to talk about giving up control, for the reward of deeper, richer research insights
Control
As qualitative researchers, we’re used to being in control
We ‘run’ groups and interviews
We ask the questions
We tell our client the answers
To exercise restraint or direction over;To hold in check, curb;To eliminate or prevent the flourishing or spread
verb:
If we’re serious about it, we
need to recognise how
they’re communicating, what
they’re saying and give them
more of our attention
Everyone’s talking about getting to know the consumer better
The new way in research is a
reflection of broader societal
changes, especially in the way
we communicate
Giving over control to the consumer makes us
better listeners
Our proposition:
“Ironically it’s by surrendering the
illusion of control over others that
one really gains power in life”
Geoff Livingston
Social media has transformed our lives
& this is just the tip of the iceberg
625,000,000 internet users worldwide
Internet Penetration62.8% Malaysia
67.4% Singapore80.6% Australia
The greatest growth comes from sharing & communication activities
User Generated Content
opinion blogs review photos video editorial ideas comment audio chat opinion blogs review photos video ideas
comment audio chat opinion blogs review photos video editorial ideas comment audio chat opinion blogs review
photos video editorial ideas comment audio chat opinion blogs review photos video editorial ideas comment audio
Everybody is talking online about everything
The big question:
What does this all mean for research?
The evolution of research
From content delivery to content creation and generation
Web 2.0 is fundamentally about change
From researcher in control, to actively
collaborating and co-creating with participants
Research 2.0 is fundamentally about change in market research
A seismic shift in our thinking is crucial for the
industry to remain relevant
We know where we’re going and how we are going to get there
Current research practice is more structured
We have to wait to see what bubbles to the service
Web 2.0 is a more fluid approach
Research 2.0 is not just about qual going online
Online Focus Groups
Similar research behaviour & skills, different environment
Researcher in control
Online Bulletin Boards
Deep individual responses to structured questions
Researcher in control
Online Research Communities
Researcher & member generated discussion – known / unknown
topics
Community in control
For the first time, market research is being influenced by social media, rather than by
research industry practices
“The researcher of the future will need to master traditional
research skills, but they will also need to be able to cede
control to customers and respondents, and to work in
collaboration with the forces of the marketplace. In terms
of a sporting metaphor the future will be less like speed
boat racing and more like surfing, less like flying a jet and
more like flying a glider”Ray Poynter, The Future Place 2006
Understanding what we gain when we give up controlA comparison of methodologies
Won’t I miss out on valuable non-verbal cues?
Will participants stick to the topic?
What happens if I end up with a lot of irrelevant information?
How can I meet my client’s objectives if I’m not in control?
What, if any, extra value do we get out of it?
Is it worth the effort?
First, are you thinking…
Bulletin Boards
Online Research Communities
In focus
Two sets of participants, using two online qualitative methods
The Study
Research 1.0 approach – Bulletin Board(a ‘traditional online qualitative platform’)
Research 2.0 approach – Social Networking Platform(online community)
Contrasting the outputs of each approach highlighted what is gained and/or lost in adopting different online qualitative platforms and approaches
Q&A approach
Limited between participant interaction
Participants respond but do not initiate discussion
Mostly text based
Other people’s responses can be hidden until the individual responds
Can stagger question
Moderator is in control
Bulletin Board Platform
Less structured, more interactive, open
Participants create profiles, avatars, upload
content
Participants choose what to be involved in
Discussions initiated by moderator (against
client objectives) and initiated by participants
(spontaneous)
Participants in control
Social Network / Online Community Platform
Branded / Customised for the client
Look and feel suits the target audience
Creates greater engagement with the brand
Online Community Features
Member Pages:
Customised to represent their personality and mood
Online Community Features
Forum Discussions:
Members and moderators create discussions and reply
Discussions are threaded so members and moderators
can comment on each others’ replies
Online Community Features
Blogs:
Provide members with the opportunity to reveal
more about themselves
They can choose to reveal as much or as little as
they want – which provides us with more insight into
their lives
Online Community Features
Disclosure
Group behaviour
Engagement
The differences between Bulletin
Boards and Online Research
communities are significant
We can still recognise you…if you want us to
How does the anonymity of the internet impact on levels of?:
The comparisonResearch 1.0 Research 2.0
Tool Bulletin Board site Social Networking site
Foundation Topic based Community based
Process Moderator posts questions, waits for responses, probes where necessary
Community generated to discuss topic, moderator seeds discussion
topics/activities, listens, observes and probes where necessary
Topics posted by Moderator Moderator or participants
Information controlled by Moderator All
Information is Mostly text based Combination of text, photos, images, videos, blogs, activities
Access Private, password protected, allow only invited participants
Private, password protected, allow only invited participants
All topics answered Yes No
Level of moderator control High Medium - Low
The comparisonResearch 1.0
Moderator in controlResearch 2.0
Participant in control
It takes time
…so sit back and let it evolve
Complexity
Giving participants more control means a greater level of complexity and messiness that we need
to embrace
Dinner party conversations
It is the value of listening to the broader
conversation that leads to insight
…depth versus breadth
A question of detail
See beyond
Open up the dialogue and allow user generated questions
…that’s the real insight
It’s the unexpected
The challenge is significantOpening up research to true two-way dialogue, giving over control to participants, and running communities rather than discussions is NOT an easy adjustment – for researchers or for clients
People are just people.
Social by nature; whether offline or online
Technology is merely an enabler.
In the end…
Case study
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Hypothesis: Choice of treatment centre is
based on reputation. Therefore public
recognition of a centre’s expertise is important
Research question: How do you decide
where to go?
Source: Communispace
By really listening…
NCCN learnt:
Focus on communicating with doctors, not ‘public’ recognition
Cancer centres must have an internet strategy
Patient experience defines perceptions of the brand, not just its leadership/expertise
Researchers learnt:
By letting the community direct and initiate their own discussions greater insights were
generated than if a structure set of topics was followed
For this community, there was added value in the social engagement between cancer
patients who felt they had a peer group to talk to
Source: Communispace
Ongoing, long term relationships
between the company and its customers
Rather than answers to specific project
based questions
Continuous access to the customer
Online Research CommunitiesCreate, manage, converse
Creating a community is complex,
requires careful consideration, and a
willingness to ‘let go’ once it gets going
90% of the hard work is out of sight
Key components
Platform creation Members Moderation Management Analysis
Set up the right environment, with the right people
Branding
Look and Feel
Features
Access Levels
Community Name
URL
Platform Creation
The community is going to be a reflection of your client’s brand. What type of brand experience do you want to create?
Members
The principles of participant selection are unchanged – it’s critical to make sure we’re talking to the right people
Sample Size
Profile
Recruitment
Incentives
Requirements
Moderation
Moderators have a far greater task, yet a less obvious ‘role’.Nurturing a community to reach its potential should be your objective
Manage engagement
Observe, listen, interact
Involvement
Topics of conversation
Manage client
Management
Managing a community is complex and labour intensiveIt needs to be attended to on a variety of levels for weeks, if not months
Building the community
Member engagement
Reward management
Client engagement
24/7 monitoring
Analysis
Managing the volume of information is a challengeKnowing how to ‘read’ the community’s behaviour & mood is crucial
Amount of information
Context
Reporting
Timing
Online qualitative requires a shift in thinking
More on moderation
Qualitative researcher Community Manager
It’s not a direct transfer of skills
+
Online Qualitative Research Community Moderator(Try fitting that on your business card!)
Creating conversations
‘Listening’
Deeper involvement
Transparency
Trust
Relationships (with clients and members)
Adapting (fast)
Redefining the skill set
Deeper!
Faster!
More!
What do our clients get out of it?
Understand what’s important to consumers
The broader context
Answer research objectives & much much more
The research objectives
Context Rich Insights
The ‘stats’ from one of our communities (FMCG)
Over or 12weeks, 100 people engaged in:
145 forum discussions:
56 discussions generated by our researchers
89 discussions generated by members
198 blog posts (within the community)
90 photos
17 videos
How much more?
I love the forum and all the different points of view. The only disappointment I have is that I just don't have the time to read through all the wonderful information posted by all the members on all the different topics :D.
I applaud you for trialing this new style of market research, and hope that other research companies look at what you have done as a shining example of a new and innovative path of getting real information for your clients
But it just goes to show you what can be accomplished in the area of market research in this day an age. When you provide a safe and encouraging environment for people to have their say, without fear of reprisal or ridicule and not have their opinions forced or swayed by money, it can be clearly seen here that most of the information discussed on [the community] just couldn't’t be bought with money
A certain futureMaintaining leadership as qualitative researchers
“One-quarter of Fortune 100 companies will launch online customer
communities to reach higher levels of engagement with customers and
prospects. This trend could mean money spent on traditional
qualitative research will be shifted to budgets for online research”
Forrester issues market research predictions for 2008
January 4, 2008
Our challenge:
Demonstrating the value in researcher-
managed communities and how they are
different from clients doing their own
information gathering through social media
Client managed communities
Smart companies use a range of methodsfor understanding the voice of the customer.
Online research communities are about purposeful two-way conversations, rather than
listening without engaging in conversation
Volume
Depth
Conversation Observation
Private Research
Communities
Brand Communities
(Public Communities)
Brand Blogs(Company managed content)
Brand Pages(MySpace, Facebook)
Web talk(x-platform,
anytime, any topic)
Conversation versus observation
Open Research Panels
Brand blogs and forum
Information on your brand is not the same as insightsThe role of the research is defined by the value of the
insights we deliver from our conversations with customers
Fans and friends
This is probably new for them
Fear factor – what if they get
stuck on the negatives
How do I know I’ll get my
answers
That’s not on my topic list
Client involvement is critical to
success
Client’s perspective
“Thank you for giving the consumer a voice & listening to our opinions”
“Focus group discussions usually only last an hour or two and are always dominated by a select few members. The online aspect allows people to really think and reflect upon their answers, so quality information is being gathered”
““Thank you for giving us the opportunity to contribute to the decision making. I think a forum such as this, is very progressive, and helps to ensure positive feedback from consumers and loyalty”
And importantly members’ perspective
“It’s the interest that you [client] and your company have shown towards us, the customers, and their opinions that makes all the difference. It’s uplifting too read how much our views and opinions mean to you”
“This is a brilliant way to instantly give feedback to the client…The alternative is to wait days/weeks/months and receive a pile of cold statistics gathered from a multitude of invisible respondents”
“It’s not often that the ‘Suits’ become involved wit the ‘Plebs’. Thanks for taking the time to make us all feel welcomed”
Explorer
Inventor
Creator
Thinker
Qualitative Researcher
The process of discovery about giving up some control in order to find out something new
Control the fundamentals
Initiate discussions
Let conversations take their course
Let Go.Discover.
Let go.
Discover.
Control the fundamentals
Initiate discussions
Let conversations take their course
LATITUDE INSIGHTSChanging the conversation
Melbourne office312 Waverley RoadMalvern East VIC 3145P: +61 3 9571 1199
Sydney officeSuite 8, 43-45 Burns Bay RoadLane Cove NSW 2066P: +61 2 9420 2337
E: [email protected]: latitudeinsights.com.au
Contact us:Dianne [email protected] 323 765
Any questions?