Upload
parag719
View
108
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Speech delivered to project managers and executives on August 25, 2014 in Columbia, Maryland for Baltimore Chapter of the Project Management Institute. Commercial and government project environments differ considerably. Project manager needs to be aware of the differences. Project success is jeopardized if the project management approach is not adapted to the environmental differences.
Citation preview
Differences in Managing Projects for Commercial versus Federal Government Clients
Parag Ambardekar August 25, 2014
[email protected] 301-805-9700
Outline
§ Context
§ Key Environmental Differences
§ Suggestion for applying PMBOK Processes
§ Suggestions for applying PMBOK Knowledge Area Concepts
§ Key Takeaways
§ Q & A
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 2
Presentation Context
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 3
Logic Underlying the Presentation
§ Commercial and government project environments differ considerably
§ Project manager needs to be aware of the differences
§ Project success is jeopardized if the project management approach is not adapted to the environmental differences
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 4
Presentation Focus
§ Commercial project and environment
§ Contrasting with government projects and environment when necessary
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 5
Applicability to Projects
§ Funded by a commercial, for-profit entity
§ End-user and client are non-governmental entities
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 6
Key Environmental Differences
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 7
Project Parameters Are Different
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 8
Proposal
Government Sector Commercial Sector
• Larger • More formal • Longer procurement cycles
• Smaller • Less formal • Quicker turnaround
Contract
• T & M, Cost Plus common • Firm Fixed Priced infrequent
• Firm Fixed Price common • Contingency, results-based
Size
• Larger • Mega-millions common • Frequently Multi-year
• Smaller • Frequently < $ 10 Million • Shorter durations
Client Approach is Different
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 9
Risk
Government Sector Commercial Sector
• Client assumes/shares risk • Vendor assumes the risk
Margins
• Lower • Single Digit Generally
• Considerably higher • > 20% common
Emphasis
• Results through process • Methodology
• Results (Client and Vendor) • Vendor focus on margins
Requirements for Information Differ
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 10
Meetings
Government Sector Commercial Sector
• More • Less
Reporting
• More formal • Relatively more
• Informal • Relatively less
Deliverables
• More formal deliverables • Requires work products
• Fewer Deliverables • Requires few work products
Client Perspectives Are Different
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 11
Government Sector Commercial Sector • I am using public funds • Reduce risk by applying
process and methodology • More communication, status
information, and reports will give us early warning of trouble
• I protect my team, my agency dollars through the audit trail I create should project go astray
• I am using investment $$$ • Get me the results
• I do not care how you achieve the results because “it is on your dime”
• Be mindful of the cost of involving my staff and me in project work and meetings
• It is easy and quick to replace you.
Suggestions for Applying PMBOK Processes
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 12
Project Initiation - Quicker and Less Formal Than Federal Project
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 13
• Master the contract details before you show up on Day 1 • Develop Project Charter as an informal document • Verify Project Charter details preferably in the first meeting but
do not involve them in the development of Project Charter
Complete the initiation phase work in the first 1-2 days
Project durations are shorter
Information needed for Project Charter already exists
Initiation documents are rarely formal deliverables
Project Manager To-Do’s
Because
Project Planning – Requires Fewer Deliverables and More Granularity for Schedule and Costs
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 14
• Requirements should be clear, detailed, atomic, and testable • Project Schedule should have tasks of about 8-20 hour duration • Lowest level of WBS should represent about 8-20 hours of work • Plan based on shorter procurement cycle, if any.
Should enable granular level project monitoring and control
Project durations are shorter
Less time available to recover from cost and schedule variances
Early warning of areas requiring attention is critical
Project Manager To-Do’s
Because
Project Execution – Application of Some Processes Require a Different Approach
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 15
• Manage stakeholder engagement and communications based on Client’s authority, sphere of influence, and preferences
• Leverage client authority and sphere of influence in conducting procurements
Communication, Stakeholder, Risk, and Procurement Management require a different approach
All stakeholders could be direct reports of client (e.g. CIO, CFO)
Client may want less communications due to org. dynamics
Client’s influential position shortens procurement cycle
Project Manager To-Do’s
Because
Project Monitoring & Control – Warrants Frequent Monitoring & Tighter Variance Thresholds
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 16
• Make thresholds and metrics to trigger corrective action on variances tighter
• Keep monitoring frequency higher and consistent with the higher level of granularity in planning
Tighten your tolerance on cost, schedule, and quality variances
Project risks are high on commercial projects
Project durations are short
Less time to recover from variances
Project Manager To-Do’s
Because
Closing the Project Same as in Federal Projects
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 17
• Initiate project closure document with the client to guard against misunderstanding arising from change in personnel
• Close each procurement conducted on the project with a formal letter as stated in PMBOK
Insist on formality
Personnel changes at client executive level are frequent
Formality in project closure lends finality to project completion
Project Manager To-Do’s
Because
Suggestions for Applying PMBOK Knowledge Area Concepts
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 18
Start Risk Management at Proposal Response
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 19
• Risk premium is added to contract price • Clients know that risk premium is added but not the specifics • Probability of some risks occurring is high
Implications for Project Manager
• Master the basis of risk premium included in contract price • Limit client involvement in risk identification and analysis • Involve client in risk response process • Frequent monitoring of risks is critical
Influencing Factors Short Project Duration High Risk Contracts
Reality and Key facts
Focus on Scope Management is Critical to Achieve Promised Results and Financial Targets
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 20
• Proposal response gives a head start to scope definition • Client pushback on change requests is common • Easy to give an impression of “Nickel and Diming” to client
Implications for Project Manager
• Know the assumptions & basis of estimate in proposal on Day 1 • Assess changes in scope since RFP in Week 1 • Avoid giving client the impression of “Nickel and Diming”
Influencing Factors Short Project Duration High Risk Contracts
Reality and Key facts
Communications Management Use Minimalist Approach
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 21
• Client sensitivity to time demands on their staff is high • Client may prefer less communications due to org. dynamics
Implications for Project Manager
• Be selective and minimalist in communications • Plan fewer meetings and reports. Use pull mechanisms • No “White Papers” • Adapt plan to client’s sphere of influence and org. dynamics
Influencing Factors Short Project Duration High Risk Contracts
Reality and Key facts
Stakeholder Management Let Client’s Sphere of Influence Dictate Approach
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 22
• All Stakeholders may be direct reports of client (e.g. CFO, CIO) • Sponsoring client may prefer fewer stakeholder communications
based on organizational dynamics
Implications for Project Manager
• Leverage client’s sphere of influence • Adapt plan to client’s sphere of influence and preference • Expect fewer stakeholders and communication channels to
manage
Influencing Factors Organizational Dynamics
Clients Sphere of Influence
Reality and Key facts
Procurement Management – Leverage Informality & Shorter Procurement Cycles to Manage Schedule
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 23
• Procurements are by invitation only which makes managing procurement schedule easier than in Federal sector
• Client may want to do the procurements with contractor assistance or include it in the turn key contract
• Be ready with research and analysis to suggest/evaluate vendors
Implications for Project Manager
• Leverage client’s and employer’s organizational assets • Capitalize on shorter procurement cycles and less formality
Influencing Factors Less Formality Shorter Procurement Cycles
Reality and Key facts
Time and Cost Management – Have More Granularity with Higher Frequency of Monitoring
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 24
• Less time available to recover from negative variances • Negative variances impact financial targets
Implications for Project Manager
• Tighten thresholds to trigger corrective action • Make frequency of monitoring consistent with the higher level of
granularity in planning (daily check common on shorter projects) • Apply Earned Value and Schedule compression techniques • Do not hesitate to use the authority and responsibility for P&L
Reality and Key facts
Influencing Factors Short Project Duration High Risk Contracts
High Margin Contracts
Key Takeaways
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 25
Key Takeaways
§ Beware of the environmental differences between commercial and federal projects
§ Adapt the project management approach to environmental differences to ensure project success
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 26
Mapping to PMBOK Knowledge Areas in PMBOK Table 3-1
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 27
Knowledge Areas Extent of Change Needed in How PMBOK Concepts are Applied
Project Integration Management Minor Change Needed
Project Scope Management Change Needed
Project Time Management Change Needed
Project Cost Management Change Needed
Project Quality Management No Change Needed
Project Human Resource Mgt. No Change Needed
Project Communication Mgt. Fair Amount of Change Needed
Project Risk Management Fair Amount of Change Needed
Project Procurement Management Fair Amount of Change Needed
Project Stakeholder Management Fair Amount of Change Needed
Questions & Answers
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 28
Questions and Answers
© 2014 Dash Group, Inc. and Parag Ambardekar 29
• Available now and after the presentation
• Free consultation (sounding board, mentoring, etc.) offered ü Every Wednesday 3.00 to 4.00 PM by prior appointment
• Contact Information
E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 301-805-9700
Company Web Site: www.dashgroupinc.net
Personal Web Site: www.paragconsults.com Blog: www.paragcmc.blogspot.com