Upload
maurizio-ronconi
View
152
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Mediterranean Italian-Greek-Turkish Interctive Workshop – Venezia, 9 ottobre 2010
Citation preview
Varicose leg ulcer 20 years after saphenectomy
Dr. Maurizio RonconiClinica Chirurgica
Spedali Civili di Brescia
Case report
female, 74 year old
ulcer of lateral surface of right distal leg
present for about 5 years
18/5/2010
Patient history
GSV stripping 1985
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
peripheral obstructive artery disease
Plastic reconstruttive free flaps for leg
ulcer in 2008, 2009, 2010
Clinical examination
Leg disconfort BMI 31,2
Right lateral leg ovalar ulcer, 3 cm in lenght,
surrounded by 8 x 5 distrophic cutaneus area
Visible varicosities along all the leg
Ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI): 0.4
Dupplex findings
bilateral major superficial venous reflux
junctional reconnection of the sapheno-femoral
confluence and its related tributaries
distal incopetent perforator vessels
venous filling index > 2 mL/sec
Bacteriological swab
Staph Aureus
Enterobacter cloacae
Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction refluxafter ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous
veinReinhard Fischer, MD,a Nikolaus Linde, MD,a Claudio Duff, MD,a Christina Jeanneret, MD,b James G.
Chandler, MD,c and Philline Seeber, MD,d St Gallen, Basle, and Wattwil, Switzerland; and Boulder, Colo
CONCLUSIONSCurrent opinion holds that there are fewer recurrences after correct saphenofemoral ligation than after incom- plete or ill-defined ligation. Many phlebologists have even ventured that there should be no saphenofemoral recur- rences after a correct ligation, but this study, with its 31- to 39-year follow-up, shows that the recurrence incidence after a well-documented and sonographically confirmed correct ligation may rise to 60% when patients are observed over the long term with color-coded duplex scanning. More than one third of the duplex scanning–detectable saphenofemoral recurrences will require additional treat- ment, and almost all of these will be B2 single-lumen vari- cose direct reconnections to the common femoral vein at the site of the former saphenofemoral ligation
J Vasc Surg 2001;34:236-40J Vasc Surg 2001;34:236-40
Leg’s ulcer natural history
Healing ratesHealing rates
68 – 83%68 – 83%
Multilayer elastic compression bandagingLeg elevationMedications
Antibiotic therapyStockings
very slowly healingvery slowly healing
elevated recurrence rateelevated recurrence rate
venous refluxvenous reflux
Visible varicosities only in about 40% of patients with superficial venous reflux
Duplex ultrasonography studies in legs with chronic ulceration show
reflux:51-53% in superficial system alone32-44% in both systems5-15% in deep system alone
Leg’s ulcer and venous reflux
Recurrence rates after healing
Study F-up Reflux Compression alone
Barweel JREurop J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000
non random
1 year superficial 28%
ZamboniEurop J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003
random 3 years superficial 38%
14%
9%
Compression + relux surgery
242
compression + surgery
258 compression alone
500 randomised500 randomised
1418 patients assessed
Healed legs not recurred
66%
85%
82%
76%Ulcer healing
Therapeutic option
A. surgeryB. EndoVenous Laser Ablation (EVLA)C. RFD. Foam sclerotherapyE. CompressionF. Other
Li AKC: A technique for re-exploration of the SFJ for recurrent varicose veins.Br J Surg 1975;62:745- 6
da Agus G.B.Chirurgia delle VariciEdra Ed., Milano 2006
dissezione da laterale (CFA) a mediale (CFV)fino a neocrosse (NC)
Surgery
EVLA
116 consecutive patients
Microfoam F-up
Healing 83%6 monthsRecurrence rate 8%
“… This minimally invasive procedure may become the treatment of choice
for venous ulcers in the future.”
Foam
27 patientsCEAP C6Reflux:
•SVR: 20 patients•SVR + DVR: 7 patients
Median Foam: 8 ml
70%
93%Ulcer healing
Venous occlusion
Median F-up Compression + foam
sclerotherapy
Healing 12 months 93%Recurrence rate 12 months 7%
“…eradication of superficial venous reflux (SVR) improves chronic venous ulcer outcome
when compared to compression alone…”
“…UGFS appears to be at least as effective as surgery as a means of dealing with SVR…”
Conclusions
We did sointravenous injection of foam, prepared in according to Tessari’s method, connecting two syringes through a three-way valve, one containing air and the other Polidocanol 3%, with a 4:1 gas/liquide ratio
1. 5 mL in the neo-safena trunk, at the middle of the tigh2. 3 mL 5 cm above a distal perforating vein near the ulcer
superficial phlebitis along the treated vein
Minor complication
Management of the complication
A.phlebectomyB. low molecular weight heparin C.occlusion bendageD.antimicrobial therapyE. non steroidal anti inflammatoryF. other
We did so
• needle thrombectomy with local anesthesia
• Evacuation of endovaricose organized hematoma
• stocking
Follow-up6/7/2010
Thank you for your kindly
attention