Upload
brucelee55
View
704
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effect of Glucagon-Like Peptide-I (GLP-I) Analogue in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease With Left
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≤ 40 %.
Principal Investigator: Wamiq Y Banday. M.B.B.S
Sub Investigators: Howard Lippes, MD.
Benjamin G. Rueda, MD.
Aravind Herle, MD.Internal Medicine Training Program. Catholic Health System.
SUNY at Buffalo. 2157 Main Street. Buffalo, NY 14214
Our Study
•Prospective•Single site•Non-randomized•Pilot study
Glucagon Like Peptide-1 • GLP-1 in a gut-derived incretin hormone that is
secreted in response to nutrients.
• It is a degradation product of pre-proglucagon molecule, a 179 amino acid residue, a product of single Glucagon gene.
• Gene is expressed in the Alpha-cells of pancreas, L-cells of Gut & neurons of the brainstem.
• GLP-1(7-36) is one of the 5 separately processed domains of pre-proglucagon. This is processed in the L-cells of the gut.
Pre-pro glucagon(179 amino acid)
BRAINPANCREAS
•Glucagon•MPGF
GUT
•GLP-1•GLP-2
•GLP-1 •GLP-1 (7-36)(Bio. Active) GLP-1 (9-36)
Agonis/antagonistFunction?
Dipetidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV)
GLP-1 Receptors & its effect.
Adapted from: T. Nystrom: Hormone Metabolism 2008:40
GLP-1 receptor • G-protein coupled receptor.
Figure 1.
FIG. 2.
GLP-1 contd• GLP-1 (7-36) is biologically active having both insulinomimetic
and insulinotropic activity.
• GLP-1 has glucoregulatory effects including
– Augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
– Suppression of postprandial glucagon secretion
– Delayed gastric emptying
– Hypothalmic-mediated satiety of apetite.
– Primarily implicated in the control of appetite and satiety.
GLP-1 and Exenatide• Exenatide is a synthetic analogue of exendin-4
found in salivary secretion of Gila Monster, Heloderma suspectum- “Lizard spit”
• Exenatide, GLP-1 analogue, is a 39-residue reptilian peptide.
• It shares 53% of its amino acid sequence with mammilian GLP-1
• It is functionally similar to mammalian GLP-1.
• Half life of exenatide is 2.4 hrs vs. 1 -4 minute for GLP-1
Mean (SEM) Serum Insulin and Plasma glucose Concentration Following a One-time Injection of BYETTA or Placebo in Fasting Type-2 Diabetic
patient
Adapted from http://www.BYETTA.com
Bench to Bedside• Pancreatic type GLP-1 receptors are found in
lung, brain, kidney, stomach and Heart.• T. Nystrom Hor Metabolism Res. 2008
– GLP-1 in myocardium • Increases glucose uptake• Cardioprotection (pro-survival factors)-
– Akt1,PI-3K & p44/p42 MAPK
• Endothelial protection (nitric oxide pathway)• Pressor effect
“Bench to Bedside” contd.• Bose et al, Diabetes 2005. GLP-1
infusion reduced the infarct size in isolated rat heart.
• Nikolaidis L A et al, J. Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2005. Limits the Myocardial stunning canines.
• Nikolaidis L A et al, Circulation 2004. LV function Improved in dogs with pacing induced DCM.
“Bench to Bedside” contd.• Nikolaidis L A et al, Circulation 2004.
Benefits of GLP-1 Infusion in patients with Severe LV dysfunction following Acute MI and reperfusion.
• George G. Sokos et al, Journal of Cardiac Failure . GLP-1 Infusion improves LV function, functional Status and quality of life in Severe heart failure patients
Myocardium, “Metabolic omnivore”
• Normal heart utilizes NEFAs (preferably), Glucose and lactate for the production ATP1,2
• Under stress –Myocardial infarction and CHF- it switches to Glucose preferably3
– Energetically more efficient.
– Less O2 requirement for ATP production.
• Metabolic adaption and flexibility by– Physiological changes and – Transcriptional mechanism41. AHA, Heart disease and Stroke staistics:2005;2003; 2. Taegtmeyer et al, Circulation
2002:105;1727-33; 3. Goodwin GW et al; J Biol Chem 1998;273;29530-29539; 4. Taegtmeyer et al, Circulation 2002;106; 2043-5
Congestive Heart Failure -“An Insulin Resistant State”
• Loss of metabolic flexibility exhibits-– Early metabolic dysregulation in failing heart1
– Features of insulin resistance 2,3
• Left Ventricular dysfunction results in – Myocardial insulin resistance as well as– Whole body insulin resistance
• Magnitude and cellular mechanism underlying myocardial insulin resistance demonstrated in concious dogs with DCM3
– Increased glucose utilization can improve Cardiac function.
• Giuseppa Paolisso et al demonstrated high norepinephrine levels associated with insulin resistance in in CHF patients4.
1. Taegtmeyer et al, ANN N Y Acad Sci, 2004;1015:1-12; 2. Shah A et al Rev A Cardiovasc Med. 2003 (suppl 6); S50-S57; 3. Nikolaidis L A et al, Cardiovascular Res 2004; 61: 297-306. 4. Metabolism 40:9:972-977,1991.
Over come insulin resistance and improve glucose Utilization
• Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion has been used as an adjuvant to MI- mixed results.
• GIK infusion can’t be used in CHF- volume• GLP-1 has similar effects on glucose
metabolism.• GLP-1 has been effective in Acute MI1
1. Nikolaidis L A et al, circulation 200; 109:962-5
“Metabolic Kick” to Chronically Insulin-Resistant Myocardium
Hypothesis
We hypothesize that Exenatide, would improve myocardial glucose utilization and will
increase the Left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with stable ischemic
cardiomyopathy and LVEF </= 40%
•IRB proposal & Approval
•Protocol and • SITE
Material & Methods
SITE “A”ICD-9 Code,
MUGA
SITE “B”ICD-9 Code,
CHF
SITE “C”Manual
chart review
Site “A”350
Site “B”240
Site”C”120
45 16 2
No. Of patients Screened
No. Of patients Qualified
6 3 1PatientsAgreed
Total patients Enrolled 10
3 patients•2 Irregular rhythm•1 difficult venous
access
Total Patients Analyzed
Patients WithdrawnFrom study
7 patients
Baseline Assessment
•LVEF Assessment
•Blood Sugar
•Heart Rate•Systolic BP•Diastolic BP
•Mean Arterial BP
Multi gated Acquisition (MUGA) Scan
•Standard Protocol
•Portable OneTouch Ultra Glucometer
•Non-Invasive•Automatic DynaMax
Exenatide (Byetta) 5 mcg
Subcutaneous administered.
60 Minutes post Exenatide.
•LVEF Assessment
•Blood Sugar
•Heart Rate•Systolic BP•Diastolic BP
•Mean Arterial BP
Multi gated Acquisition (MUGA) Scan
•Standard Protocol
•Portable OneTouch Ultra Glucometer
•Non-Invasive•Automatic DynaMax
Monitoring•Heart Rate
•Blood Pressure( SBP,DBP & MAP)
•Blood Sugar
•30 minutes•60 minutes•90 minutes
Analysis of Ejection fraction of Pre & post Exenatide•Automatic, computerized
•Compared pre and post Exenatide
Calculated:• Primary End Point
•Secondary End Points•Patients acted there own controls
•Computer out put was manually analyzed•Reader was blinded
Compliance with HIPAA
Statistical analysis
• SPSS software• Paired t-test• Independent t-test• Mean ± SEM• P-value(2-tailed) and <0.05 was
statistically significant.
Table: Patient DemographicNo. Of patients 7
Age (yrs) 70 3
Male, N (%) 5 (71.4)
Female 2 (28.5)
Weight (kgs) 94 9.2
BMI (kg/m2) 30.5 3.2
SBP (mmHg) 125 4
DBP (mmHg) 73.4 4.26
MAP (mmHg) 88.2 4.182
Heart rate (beats/min.) 73 5.34
Regular rhythm, N (%) 7 (100)
Diabetes , N (%) 4 (57)
Hypertension, N (%) 3 (43)
Coronary artery disease, N (%) 7(100)
BMI, Body mass index; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, Mean arterial pressure;
Table: Patient Demographic (contd)Dyslipidemia 6 (85)
Serum Creat. (mg/dL) 1.29 0.107
BUN (mg/dL) 22.7 3.23
HbAIC (%) 6.4 0.252
Baseline BGT (mg/dL) 121.29 10.59
ACE/ARB, N (%) 6(85)*
Beta-Blockers, N (%) 6 (85)1
Loop-diuretics, N (%) 4 (57)
Spironolactone, N(%) 1 (14.3)
Aspirin, N(%) 6 (85)2
Plavix, N(%) 1 (14.3)
Statin, (N%) 6 (85)
AICD, N (%) 2 (28.5)
Pacemaker, N (%) 1 (14.3)
* Patient was Allergic to ACE/ARB; 1 Patient developed bradycardia and Mobitz Type I- 20 Heart Block.
Inclusion criteria• Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤
40%.
• Optimum medical therapy for CHF for 6 weeks:–ACE inhibitors/ARB and
–Beta Blockers
–Loop diuretics ± Spironolactone
• Stable coronary artery disease
Exclusion Criteria• Heart failure due to or associated with
– Uncorrected thyroid disease, – Obstructive cardiomyopathy, – Pericardial disease, – Amyloidosis or – Active myocarditis.
• Hospitalization for acute decompensation of CHF in the past 60 days.
• Type 1 diabetes mellitus. • CABG, LV reduction procedure or cardiomyoplasty within
30 days.• Liver enzyme > 5 times the upper limit of normal, • Prolonged prothrombin time in the absence of systemic
anticoagulation therapy at the time of screening.• Serum creatinine > 3.5 mg/dL or long-term dialysis.• Currently on Exenatide ( Byetta*)
END POINTS
Primary • Short term
change in– Left Ventricular
Ejection Fraction, %
Secondary• End diastolic volume
index (EDVI).• End systolic volume
index (ESVI)• Hemodynamic
response.– SBP, DBP, MAP, HR.
• Short term side effects.
Results.
Table 4: Pre Exenatide (mean SEM)
60 minutes Post Exenatide (mean SEM)
P-value* (2-tailed)
LVEF (%) 33.86 3.051 35.86 2.915
0.013
EDVI (ml/m 2)1 63.2 4.7 70.4 3.5 0.212
ESVI (ml/m 2) 2 41 3.9 44.2 3.85 0.381
Blood sugar (mg/dL)
121.29 10.58 82.43 7.521 0.0211
EDV was measured in only 6 out of 7 patients. 2 ESV was measured in only 6 out of 7 patients.
* P-values were calculated with paired t-test
LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; EDV, End diastolic volume; ESV, End systolic volume;
Table 4: Contd.
Pre Exenatide (mean SEM)
60 minutes Post Exenatide (mean SEM)
P-value* (2-tailed)
Heart Rate (beats/min)
71.86 5.378 71.29 3.414
0.888
SBP (mmHg)1
124.86 4.334 128.6 2.836
0.528
DBP (mmHg)2
73.43 4.264 76.71 1.985
0.276
MAP (mmHg)3
88.2 4.182 93. 2.7092 0.207
1. SBP, Systolic blood pressure; 2. DBP, Diastolic blood pressure; 3. MAP, Mean arterial pressure. * P-values were calculated with paired t-test.
Change in LVEF %, 60 min. post Exenatide
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Baseline 60 minutes
32.5
33
33.5
34
34.5
35
35.5
36
36.5
Baseline 60 minutes
p- value = 0.013
Increase in LVEF %, 7 patients Mean change in LVEF%, 7 patients
LV
EF
%
LV
EF
%
Time Time
LVEF %, Diabetic vs Non-Diabetic
0
10
20
30
40
50
Diabetic Non-diabetics0
10
20
30
40
50
Diabetic Non- diabetic
p- value = 0.4
Mean LVEF %, Base line Mean LVEF%, 60 minutesMean LVEF%, 60 minutes
LV
EF
%
LV
EF
%
p- value = 0.37
Hemodynamic Changes (Mean, n=7)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 min. 30 min. 60 min. 90 min.
Heart rate(beats/min.)
Systolic BP (mmHg)
Diastolic BP( mmHg)
MAP (mmHg)
Time
Change in Blood Sugar ( Mean, n=7)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 min. 30 min. 60 min. 90 min.
Blood sugar(mg/dL)
Blo
od S
ugar
, mg/
dL)
Time
MUGA Scan Time vs. Change in LVEF %
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Scan Time LVEF change • No linear relation was seen between “Duration of MUGA scan” and “Change in LVEF %”.
Conclusion• Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
significantly improved 60 minutes after administration of Exenatide
• Improvement in LVEF was seen in both-
–Diabetic and
–Non-diabetics
• There was no increasing tendency of change in LVEF with high average MUGA scan time.
• Blood sugar significantly decreased.
Conclusion contd.• No significant change in-
–End diastolic volume index (EDVI)–End systolic volume index (ESVI)–Heart rate (HR) and –Mean arterial pressure (MAP).
Further Recommendations
• No study has yet been conducted to elucidate the long term effects of GLP-1 in large clinical trials (randomised, blinded and adequately powered)
• This paucity appears to be due to technical difficulties with the continuous infusion of GLP-1.
• Exenatide used in the standard doses, technically feasible, has providing the promisisng results in our Pilot Study
Limitation of Our Study
• Non-randomized.• Small number of subjects.• Short-Term effect.
Disclosure• Exenatide is unlabeled/unapproved drugs for CHF.• This study was not funded by any Pharmaceutical
company or any government organization• Wamiq Y Banday MBBS None• Benjamin G. Rueda MD None• Aravind Herle MD None• Howard Lippes MD
• Speakers Bureau; Amylin Pharmaceuticals• Speakers Bureau; Eli Lilly Co.,• Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk,
AcknowledgementSpecial Thanks!
All Patients who participated in the Study
Acknowledgement• Mentor
– Dr. Howard Lippes.– Benjamin G. Rueda.– Dr Aravind Herle.
• Nuclear medicine staff. • Research Nurse coordinator- Rose
Ganong• Institutional Review Board• Dr. Mohammad Tahir - For Statistics• Department of Internal Medicine- Sisters
hospital. • Program Director. Dr Khalid J Qazi.
Question?
Thank you!