CCS on the Global Climate Agenda

November 6, 2014

Sumie Nakayama

J-POWER

THE GLOBAL STATUS OF CCS 2014

J-POWER, Who We Are

Total capacity

23 GW *

Overseas

5 GW

Japan

18 GW

1950

'51

'52

'53

'54

'55

'56

'57

'58

'59

1960

'61

'62

'63

'64

'65

'66

'67

'68

'69

1970

'71

'72

'73

'74

'75

'76

'77

'78

'79

1980

'81

'82

'83

'84

'85

'86

'87

'88

'89

1990

'91

'92

'93

'94

'95

'96

'97

'98

'99

2000

'01

'02

'03

'04

'05

'06

'07

'08

'09

2010

0

5

10

15

20

Established by the government (1952) Fully privatized (2004)

Overseas

Trends in power generation capacity

(GW)

Domestic

(As of June, 2014)

* Capacity figures shown represent J-POWER’s net ownership interest.

Our Core Business

Wholesale electric power business in Japan

Overseas power generation business

Our Growth Strategy

Start commercial operation of overseas projects currently under development

Pursue increased profits under electric system reform (deregulation)

Wind, gas

Coal-fired

Hydro

Figure SPM.4. GHG Emission Pathways 2000-2100: All AR5 Scenarios

IPCC AR5 WG3 Summary for Policy Makers:

With RCP 2.6 Scenario, it is likely (66-100%) that temperature increase will be kept less than 2 degree.

As most of papers for 2 degree scenario assumes significant CO2 emission reduction by BECCS, the number of papers that supports 2 degree scenario without CCS is very few, almost impossible.

Figure SPM.7. Direct Sectrial CO2 and Non-CO2 Emission in Baseline and Mitigation Scenarios with and without CCS

= 2℃ scenario = 2℃ scenario

2 degree scenarios assume considerable level of world common carbon price

> 1000 USD/t-CO2

> 200 USD/t-CO2

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

CO2

Emis

sion

s (G

t)

CCS Renewable EnergyEnd-use fuel and electricity efficiency End-use fuel switchingNuclear Power generation efficiency and fuel switching

Figure 1.3 Contribution to annual emissions reductions between 6DS and 2DS by technologies

Emissions in 6DS (6 degree scenario)

Emissions in 2DS (2 degree scenario)

IEA ETP 2014: CCS plays a certain role for 2℃ scenario (but not so considerable compared to renewables and energy efficiency).

Gap between Scenarios (Reality and Dream?)

IEA WEO 2014 also shows gaps between scenarios.

Gap between Time Scales

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

CO

2 E

mis

sio

ns

(G

t)

CCS Renewable EnergyEnd-use fuel and electricity efficiency End-use fuel switchingNuclear Power generation efficiency and fuel switching

2015

COP21

2020 2030

COP20Negotiation on Post 2020 Agreement

Ratification Process (negotiation extended?)

Implementation of Agreement (start of implementation delayed?)

COP26?

2011

Climate Change International Policy Negotiation

Gap between Time Scales

2015

COP21

2020 2030

COP20Negotiation on Post 2020 Agreement

Ratification Process (negotiation extended?)

Implementation of Agreement (start of implementation delayed?)

COP26?

2011

Climate Change International Policy Negotiation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

CO2

Emiss

ions

(Gt

)

CCS Renewable EnergyEnd-use fuel and electricity efficiency End-use fuel switchingNuclear Power generation efficiency and fuel switching

J-POWER’s “Step by Step Approach”

FY 1995～ 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 ･･･

EAGLE Project

R&D of Fuel cell

Feasibility study

Step 1Oxygen-blown IGCC

Step 2IGCC with CO2 capture

Step 3IGFC with CO2 capture

　　　　　　

IGCC（ 150t-coal/day ）

Chemicalabsorption

Physical absorption

FS

　　　　　　

Fuel cell

DesignManufacturingConstruction

△Nov. 2015Power Receiving

▽Mar. 2017Demonstration start

： OCG Project scope

FS

DesignManufacturing Construction▲Mar. 2013

　 Construction start

Demonstration

Demonstration

Demonstration

DesignManufacturingConstruction

Osaki CoolGen IGCC+CO2 Capture Plant (Image)

Osaki 1-1 unitowned by Chugoku

EPCO

Additional waste water treatment unit

Air separation unit

Combined Cycle generation unit

CO2 capture unit(planned in step2)

Coal gasification unit

Gas clean up unit

Existing waste water treatment unit

Coal storage yard

IGCC plant

　　 Existing Osaki 1-1 unit

12

4 Partnership: J-POWER/MHI @J-POWER Matsushima P/S

4 Method: Chemical Absorption (KS-1)

4 Gas flow rate: 1,750Nm3/h

4 CO2 Capture rate: 10 t/day

4 Test period: July ‘06 – October ‘08

Post-combustion

Oxyfuel Combustion

Pre-Combustion

　 PCF

Coal Gasification

PCF

4 Partnership: CS Energy, ACA, Glencore Xstrata, Schlumberger / J-POWER, IHI, Mitsui @ Callide A P/S in QL, Australia

4 Fund: Australian, QLD Gov. and Japanese Gov.4 Plant Capacity: 30MWe4 CO2 Capture rate: Up to 75t/d4 Storage: Saline Aquifer4 Test period: June ‘12 – Early ‘15

4 Partnership: J-POWER/NEDO @J-POWER Wakamatsu Research Institute, EAGLE plant

4 Method: Chemical / Physical Absorption

4 Gas flow rate: 1,000Nm3/h

4 CO2 Capture rate: 24 t/d

4 Test period: Nov. ‘08 – June ‘14

J-POWER covers three major CO2 Capture technologies for coal-fired power stations.J-POWER covers three major CO2 Capture technologies for coal-fired power stations.

Visiting All Prospective CO2 Capture Technologies

Pilot Plant

Demo. Plant

Pilot Plant