25
Feasibility Evaluation of Cleaner Production Options

Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

Feasibility Evaluation of Cleaner Production Options

Page 2: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 2

Select workable CP opportunities

Categorize options into:1. Implement obviously feasible options

2. Reject obviously non-feasible options

3. Remaining options - conduct feasibility analysis

Page 3: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

Feasibility of CP options

Technical feasibilityFinancial feasibility Environmental feasibility

05/01/23 3

Page 4: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 4

Technical feasibilityAvailability and reliability

of equipmentRequirements for utilities,

process monitoring and control, space etc.

Maintenance requirements

Operator and supervisor skills

Ease of retrofitting into existing system

Projected material balance

Projected energy balance

Page 5: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 5

Assess technical feasibilityConsumption Rates: Before implementation After implementation Inputs: raw materials labour energy water etc. Outputs: products solid waste wastewater Gaseous emissions etc.

Page 6: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

Parameters Weight Score Weighted Score

Level of meeting specifications

3 5 15

Availability and reliability of after sales service

2 2 4

Utility requirements

2 3 6

Availability of auxiliary equipment

2 3 6

Compatibility with other systems

2 4 8

Total 3905/01/23 6

Page 7: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

If technically not feasible,

05/01/23 7

Reject the optionNot necessary to evaluate financial and environmental feasibility

Page 8: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 8

Assess financial viability

Consists of:1. Data collection:investments;operational costs & benefits

2. Choice of economic criteria3. Economic calculations

Page 9: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 9

Assess financial viability

Data collection (from technical evaluation):

1. Investment:equipment, construction, training, start up etc.

2. Operational costs and benefits:before and after comparison

Page 10: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 10

Operational costs and benefitsElectricityMan powerChemicalMaintenanceTraining costInterest and

depreciation

Direct savings (tangible benefits)

Indirect savingsTreatment costDisposal costHealth and safety

Page 11: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 11

Timing of Cash Flows

Workingcapital

Annual Operating CostsAnnual Tax Payments

Annual Financing Payments

Salvage ValueEnd of project:

Time zero:

Initial InvestmentWorking Capital

TIMEYear 1 Year 2 Year 3

Annual Revenues/Savings

Page 12: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 12

Profitability IndicatorsA profitability indicator, or “financial indicator”, is: “a single number that is calculated for characterisation of project profitability in a concise, understandable form.”Common examples are:

Simple PaybackReturn on Investment (ROI)Net Present Value (NPV)Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Page 13: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 13

Simple PaybackThis indicator incorporates:

the initial investment cost the first year cash flow from the project

Simple Payback (in years)

Initial Investment

Year 1 Cash Flow=

Page 14: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 14

How to Interpret Simple Payback

The simple payback calculated for a project is usually compared to a company rule of thumb called a “hurdle” rate:

e.g., if the payback period is less than 3 years, then the project is viewed as profitable

Page 15: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 1515

The Time Value of Moneyand

Net Present Value (NPV)

Page 16: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 1616

Question:

If we were giving away money, would you rather have:

(A) $10,000 today, or(B) $10,000 3 years

from now

Explain your answer...

Page 17: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 17

InflationMoney loses purchasing power over time as product/service prices rise, so a dollar today can buy more than a dollar next year.

costs $1 costs $1.05

inflation 5%

nownow next yearnext year

Page 18: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 18

Investment OpportunityA dollar that you invest today will bring you more than a dollar next year — having the dollar now provides you with an investment opportunity

Interest, or “return on investment”

Investing $1 now

InvestmentGives you

$1.10 a year from now

Page 19: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 1919

Present Value Factors Value of $1 in the future, NOW

Discount rate (d): 10% 20% 30% 40% Years into future (n) 1 .9091 .8333 .7692 .7142

2 .8264 .6944 .5917 .5102 3 .7513 .5787 .4552 .3644 4 .6830 .4823 .3501 .2603 5 .6209 .4019 .2693 .1859 10 .3855 .1615 .0725 .0346 20 .1486 .0261 .0053 .0012 30 .0573 .0042 .0004 .0000

Page 20: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 2020

Net Present Value (NPV) Net Present Value (NPV) = the sum of the present values of all of a project’s cash flows, both negative (cash outflows) and positive (cash inflows)

NPV characterises the present value of the project to the company

If NPV > 0, the project is profitable

If NPV < 0, the project is not

Page 21: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 21

Environmental evaluation

Comparison between the current material balance and the projected material balance

Reduction in quantity of wasteLess hazardous materialsReduction in energy lossesReduction in water consumptionReduction of material consumption

Page 22: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 22

Selection of feasible options

Tabulate the results of technical, economic and environmental evaluations

Eliminate technically non-feasible optionsEliminate options without significant net

environmental benefitCombine the results to rank the options

Page 23: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 23

Weighted matrix method

Technical Feasibility - 25 Low: 0 – 5Med: 6 – 14High: 15 – 25

Economic Viability - 50 Low: 0 – 10Med: 11 – 29High: 30 – 50

Environmental Feasibility 25 Low: 0 – 5Med: 6 – 14High: 15 - 25

Page 24: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 24

Weighted matrix method

Technical – cannot be negativeEconomical – can be negativeEnvironmental – no option should be

negativeRanking – prioritize according to your

needs

Page 25: Cp gp day03 session 10 - feasibility of cp options

05/01/23 25

Thank You!