Upload
tanweer-sudhan
View
150
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
research conducted on WOM and Brand loyalty
Citation preview
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
{
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Word of mouth and brand loyalty
Presented by: Tanweer, waheed Murad & Rashid ali
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Variables
Independent variable Word of mouth
Dependent variable Brand loyalty
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Informal, person-to-person communication between a perceived noncommercial communicator and a receiver regarding a brand, a product, an organization, or a service” (Harrison-Walker, 2001)
WOM is informal communication about a product or a service; that can occur between two or more consumers (Ryu and Han, 2009).
Word of mouth
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Brand loyalty Brand loyalty is defined as positive
feelings towards the brand and intense dedication to purchase the same product/service repeatedly now and in the future from the same brand, regardless of competitors' actions or changes in the environment (Liu, 2007; Wood, 2004)
Brand loyalty means that consumers will repeatedly purchase the same brand (Chaudhuri and Holbrook, 2001).
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Problem statement What is the relationship between
word of mouth and brand loyalty that influence Pakistani consumers and also the overall relationship between brand loyalty and word of mouth?
PRESENTED TO MAM NOOR UL AIN
The aim of this study was to discover the
scope of word-of-mouth amongst the Pakistani consumer.
More specifically, we investigate both the relationship between word of mouth and brand loyalty.
Research objective
PRESENTED TO MAM NOOR UL AIN
Word of mouth:
In our research word of mouth means transmitting information and informal or formal way of communication through which people market different product through word of mouth, and people change their perception about brands. WOM is independent variable. Brand loyalty:The tendency of some consumers to continue buying the same brand of product rather than competing brands. A positive perception of consumers about a brand and their future commitment to buy a brand and brand loyalty is dependent variable.
Operational definitions:
PRESENTED TO MAM NOOR UL AIN
Hypothesis:
H0: There is no relationship between WOM and Brand loyalty.
H1: There is a positive relationship between Word of mouth (WOM) and Brand loyalty.
PRESENTED TO MAM NOOR UL AIN
Word of mouth has 13 items Brand loyalty has 8 items Age, gender and education was also mention The questionnaire was measured through a 5
point Likert scale (1 for Strongly Disagree, 2 for Disagree, 3 for neutral, 4 for Agree & 5 for Strongly Agree).
METHODOLOGY
PRESENTED TO MAM NOOR UL AIN
Statistical Tests Reliability was measured through
Cronbach’s alpha test Frequency tests were used for
checking the age, gender Correlation test was conducted to test
the hypothesis. Regression test was used to check the
variations in the data. Descriptive statistics conducted to
check the demographics of the dependent and independent variables
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
SAMPLE SUBJECTTable 5.1 Gender of Subjects
Gender Frequency %age
Males 116 57.7
Females 85 42.3
Total 201 100.0
Table 5.2 Subjects Age
Age Frequency Percentage
17-20 years 38 18.9
21-23 years 125 62.2
24& above 38 18.9
Total 201 100.0
Table 5.3 Subjects Education
Education Frequency Percentage
Bachelors 62 30.8
Masters 126 62.7
M.Phill/PhD 13 6.5
Total 201 100.0
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Analysis of Data
Reliability
Table 6.1.1 Reliability Cronbach’s alpha Objects .610 21
Table6.1.2 Reliability of variables
Variables N Cronbach’s alpha Word of mouth 13 0.722 Brand royalty 08 0.553
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Descriptive statistics Table 6.1.3 Brand Loyalty (Age, gender, education of Respondents)
Ages Means N S.D 17-19 Years 3.23 38 .47
20-22 Years 3.24 125 .57 23 & above Total
3.27 3.25
38 201
.54
.54
Gender Male Female total Education Bachelors Masters M.Phill/PhDs total
3.25 3.24 3.25 3.19 3.27 3.29 3.52
116 85 201 62 126 13 201
.56 .52 .54 .54 .54 .63 .54
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Descriptive statistics
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Correlation
Table 6.5.1 Correlations WOM Brand Loyalty
WOM .192 Sig (2-tailed) .006 N 201 201
Brand loyalty
.192
Sig (2-tailed) .006 201 N 201
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
RegressionTable 6.6.1 Coefficients
Model β Coefficients
Std Error
Standardized Coefficients
T Sig.
(Constant) 2.64 .22 11.82 .000 Word of Mouth .173 .06 .192 2.76 .006
Adjusted R Square .032
F test value 7.62 Sig level .006 Durbin Watson 1.71
PR
ESEN
TED
TO
MA
M N
OO
RU
L AIN
Findings:positive relationship between WOM and Brand loyalty
Discussion:Our findings are interrelated with the findings of (Taylor and Hunter, 2003), (Neal and Strauss, 2008). They also find positive relationship between word of mouth and brand loyalty
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Limitation of study:• small sample size• small Number of variables lack of resources• especially time resource was limited
Recommendation for future research:• consider personality traits as a sub variable • Sample size and the time limit should be
increase
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
The article helps firms plan their marketing strategy
This research helps firms understand the context of brand loyalty in terms of looking at Pakistani consumers.
Managers can use Word of Mouth in order to promote the brand and to increase the loyalty among the consumers.
Managerial Implications
MANAGERAL IMPLECATIONS:
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN
Conclusion:
The research is conducted using different statistical tools and the reliability of research is good and the relationship find between two variables is positive which is also supported by previous research.
There are some limitations which can be taking into consideration for future research purpose like (take personality as a moderating variable).
Overall the result of research was satisfactory.
PRESENTED TO MAM NOORUL AIN