Upload
lisa-dillman
View
125
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Who we are…
We are normal teachers — not experts.We are here to share what we have tried as a result of our grant, and hopefully to learn from you! Jason Batten, chemistry & physics Rob Daniell, physics & biology Janeé Gerard, chemistry & physics Alexis Hanson, biology & anatomy &
physiology Andy Osterhaus, physics & robotics
Daniell
Where we teach…Animo Pat Brown Charter HS
Public Charter School in South Central LA Public Funding Accountable to LAUSD/WASC/etc. More autonomy than a traditional public school
Admission by neighborhood lottery Our Students (~550 kids total):
96% Latino, 4% African American 99% socioeconomically disadvantaged 75%+ English Learners 10% SPED
Daniell
Background: Our Grant
Students have great CST scores, but they still struggle immensely when they get to college.
How can we help them deal with rigorous college coursework?
Batten
Physics (9th) Bio (10th) Chem (11th)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percent of Students Scoring Advanced/Proficient (2012 CST)
APB Fremont South Gate
Our Grant Program Title: “Developing Scientistis” PD #1: Model-Based Reasoning
Work with Dr. Cindy Passmore, UC Davis Align curriculum to authentic scientific practice
PD #2: Reading Apprenticeship Work with RA division of WestEd Structure metacognitive conversation around
reading PD #3: Center for Math and Science
Teaching Work with Kathy Clemmer, LMU Develop systems that support fluent scientific
practice
Batten
Our Goal Today: Make Thinking Visible
In order to succeed in college, our students must think much more rigorously and deeply.
The only way to work together with students on their thinking is to make this thinking “visible”.
Today we present two ways we have had success in this: Reading Academic Discourse
Batten
Agenda
Reflect on your practice Part I: Reading
Importance View work samples of student thought on readings Review strategies for achieving this
Part II: Academic Discourse Importance View transcripts of class discussions Review strategies for achieving this
Discussion (if time) Benefits to our students Remaining challenges
Batten
Brainstorm:What are you currently doing?
What strategies do you use to help students think deeply about complex texts?
What strategies do you use to help students discuss their thinking in class?
Gerard
Why MUST we teach reading?
~50% of HS students taking the ACT in 2008-09 did NOT meet the benchmark score (21/36) in reading.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) “the need for remedial reading appears to be the most serious barrier to degree completion”. Only 30% of students from 1992-2000 who took a
remedial college reading class went on to receive a degree or certificate.
In contrast, 69% of students requiring no remedial reading course in college graduated with a degree.
Gerard
Why we MUST teach reading
Difficulty of college texts & periodicals measured by Lexile scores has increased since 1962 (Stenner, Koons, & Swartz, in press)
Teaching content-based complex reading is essential for both high- and low-income kids!
Gerard
Making Thinking Visible: Reading
The rules of reading change from discipline to discipline.
Skilled readers carry out a multitude of invisible processes while they read.
We must surface these invisible processes to teach them to our students.
Two ways to make them visible: Speaking our thinking out loud (Think
Aloud) Annotating our thinking (Talking to the Text)
Gerard
Review student work samples This are authentic samples: from high to
low! Individually: Annotate (through pg. 11)
Multiple work samples from each grade level.
What evidence of thinking do you see on these pages?
With partner: Share out observations Group Discussion:
What did you notice? What questions do you have?
Gerard
Strategies for Achieving This Making reading routine
Replacing many lectures with readings Think aloud
Teacher thinks aloud Reciprocal think aloud Partner think aloud
Thinking stem bookmarks Scaffolding reading through the year
Teacher-made textbook and other authentic sources Short Long Highly chunked Extended time Quite structured Freedom
Everyone
Why MUST we teach academic discourse?
Video sample Our inspiration: teacher evaluation rubric
Hanson
Review student discussion transcripts These are authentic samples: recorded
this week! Individual: Read and annotate
What kinds of thinking do you see students engaging in? E.g. analyzing ________, clarifying _________
Partner: Share Group Discussion:
What do you notice? What questions do you have?
Hanson
Strategies for achieving this
Assessing student participation via seating chart
Sentence Starters Formal Informal
Group accountability cards Making discussion routine:
Post-warm-up (catalyst), post-reading, homework/exam review, etc.
Pre- and post-discussion input from teacher
Everyone
Benefits Increases depth of thought in all areas of
class; as kids learn to discuss with one another, they are enabled to work through content at a deeper level.
Class becomes much more interesting and student-centered.
Kids learn a valuable set of professional skills for life beyond secondary school.
Principal quote: "I've been seeing a general shift: more explaining and less copying."
Osterhaus
Remaining Challenges
How to measure the impact of this work? How to adapt this to different groups of
students? Different periods have different
personalities Establishing these routines takes time
At the beginning of the year, we are behind in pacing
Starting out is difficult Creating authentically situated materials
is difficult Ex) Models of the atom packet
Everyone
Thank you!
Questions?
For further information, please contact Jason Batten at [email protected]
Batten