Upload
chris-oneal
View
711
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
General Strategies for Writing and Submitting an Effective ISTE Conference Submission
Citation preview
STRATEGIES FOR WRITING AND
SUBMITTING AN EFFECTIVE ISTE
CONFERENCE SUBMISSION
Chris O’Neal@onealchris
#iste2014
TOPICS
Information
Proposals
Tips
Timelines
Q & A
Note: Conference planner – this session entry also has link to webinar
ATTENDEES
Submitted AcceptedAcceptance
Rate
BYOD 215 105 48.84%
Interactive lecture
531 78 14.69%
Lecture/panel 616 107 17.37%
Poster 650 337 51.85%
Research paper
101 55 54.46%
Snapshot 174 44 25.29%
Workshop 312 183 58.65%
Total 2,599 909 34.97%
PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE RATES
EVALUATING THIS YEAR
Session evaluations
Room counts
Overall conference-evaluation feedback
Requests from participants
General feedback
TABLE NETWORKING
How many of you are going to submit for this coming year’s
conference in Philadelphia?
Table Share:
What are your favorite types of ISTE sessions to attend
and why?
If you have favorite presenters, what is it that they do that
makes you keep coming back?
GOAL OF SUBMISSION PROCESS
To allow the program committee and the
reviewers to get the best information
possible for choosing the program content.
GENERAL PROCESS
• Proposals are collected and grouped with a team chair who is an expert in that area
• They assemble a team of 3-5 educational-content experts to evaluate against the rubric
• Guidance/webinars to ensure objectivity
• 70 teams reading 2000+ proposals
OVERVIEW & TIMELINE• Call for Participation – September
• Proposals submitted
• Program Proposal Review Teams Assembled
• Team Chair organizes team and schedule
• Team evaluates against proposal rubric
• Conference calls, emails, etc.
• Recommendations made to ISTE Program Committee
PROCESS NOTES
• Program chair may recommend multiple presenters to team up in a panel, if the themes are similar
• Clarification Issues
• Notifications sent
WEB TOUR
PRESENTATION TYPE
• LISTEN AND LEARN
• PARTICIPATE AND SHARE
• EXPLORE AND CREATE
• ENGAGE AND CONNECT
SUBMITTING - TITLE
• Titles should clearly depict what is going to be presented in the session.
• For example, “Bytes, Camera, Action!”, although creative, does not adequately describe what the session is about.
• "Bytes, Camera, Action: Incorporating Digital Video in the Classroom" does.
SESSION DESCRIPTION• Descriptions should be accurate and
enticing.
• Workshop descriptions in particular should be designed to “sell” the workshop.
• Effective descriptions should contain action words and focus on benefits to participants rather than a narrative of workshop content.
AUDIENCE FOCUS• Chief Technology Officers/Superintendents/School
Board Members
• Curriculum/District Specialists
• Professional Developers
• Library Media Specialists
• Principals/Head Teachers
• Technology Coordinators/Facilitators
PROPOSAL SUMMARY - GENERAL• Educational significance and
contribution to the respective theme and strand
• Degree to which higher-order applications of technology are addressed
• Ease of replication & value to participants
• Presenter knowledge and experience
PURPOSE & OBJECTIVES• Written as participant outcomes
• Educational or infrastructure challenge/situation
• Technology intervention (include specific names/titles and descriptions, if not widely known)
• Models employed (include brief description)
• Lesson plans or instructional strategies employed (include a brief description of your resources/tools)
• Evidence of success, graphical displays of plan
CATEGORY SELECTION• Strongly consider your audience
• Decide format – lecture, poster, workshop, etc.
• Select appropriate theme/strand
• Let’s look at the presenter submission form.
GENERAL TIPS
• Think back on highly-engaging sessions or presenters you really liked:
• What stands out?
• Would you have done what they did?
GENERAL TIPS
• If this will be the first year you submit, consider a poster session – plan for videos, posters, and other materials, so you can build your presentation experience
• TakingITGlobal, for example, prefers to do posters because they are personal and informal
GENERAL TIPS• Think very carefully about how to write and
prepare for your intended audience
• Teachers – want successful and practical sharing of ideas and resources
• Administrators – want to know about instructional success, policy and funding issues, scalability
• Tech coordinators – rollout issues, cost, ROI, p.d.
GENERAL TIPS
• If you are fairly new to presenting, build up your experience now
• Presenter background is important
• Presenter’s experience can help
GENERAL TIPS
• Have critical friends review your proposal
• The idea
• The theme/strand applicability
• The written contents
REMINDERS• View current conf site to view accepted-
session details
• September is most the important milestone
• Start now with your idea
• Prepare your outline
• Get with a friend to come up with clever title/description and sharp objectives
FUTURE CONFERENCES• ISTE 2015
• Philadelphia, Penn., June 28-July 1, 2015
• ISTE 2016
• Denver, Co., June 26-29, 2016
• ISTE 2017
• San Antonio, Texas, June 26-29, 2017