25
A contrastive analysis of English and Persian intonation by AM. Hayati Dr. M. Mostafaei By: Sh. Tamizrad Fall 2014

Sheila tamizrad hayati

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

A contrastive analysis of English and Persian

intonation by AM. Hayati

Dr. M. MostafaeiBy: Sh. Tamizrad

Fall 2014

Page 2: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Content

• Introduction• Contrastive Analysis• Prediction• Subjects• Data• Administration• Data Analysis• Discussion• Conclusion

Page 3: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Introduction

• The first objective: to predict the problems of

Iranian speakers to produce the correct

patterns of English intonation.

• Three level of structure:

– Simple sentence

– Compound sentence

– Complex sentence

Page 4: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Contrastive Analysis

• Simple sentence:

1. Declarative Falling

• Affirmative Similar

• Negative A bit different

Page 5: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Contrastive Analysis

• Simple sentence:

2. Questions

I. WH-Q No difference

Page 6: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Contrastive Analysis

• Simple sentence:

2. Questions

II. Y/N Q Similarities in intonation

Page 7: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Contrastive Analysis

• Compound sentence

1. Coordinate

2. Subordinate

I. Conditional sentence

II. Dependent Clause

Page 8: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Prediction

1. Negative statement

Page 9: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Prediction

2. WH-word Q

Page 10: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Prediction

3. Question tag

Page 11: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Prediction

4. Clauses

Page 12: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Prediction

• Question tag

Page 13: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Data

• Some of the most common structures

• Statements: Affirmative and Negative

• Questions: Wh-word Q and Y/N Q

Page 14: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Administration

• To read and record selected sentences

• Four judges

Page 15: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Data Analysis

• Three aspects:

– words,

– tones,

– Attitudes

• Simple statistics

Page 16: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Discussion

• Affirmative sentences:

Page 17: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Discussion

• Negative sentences:

• Question:

Similarity

Page 18: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

1. Stress has significant influence on

intonation

2. The broad definition of similarity and

contrast in CA.

Page 19: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

• Level 1: The final syllable of the last word in

equivalent sentences of L1 and L2 is stressed

and accompanied by similar pitch change.

Page 20: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

• Level 2: The final syllable of the word is

stressed in two languages regardless of

it’s position in the sentences.

Page 21: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

• Level 3: The final two-syllable word of two

equivalent sentences is stressed but the primary

stress occurs on the first syllable in L2 and

second in L1.

Page 22: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

• Level 4: Regarding the compound the adj and N

are stressed in L2 and L1. Both languages follow

the same pattern of pitch change depending on

the sentence type.

Page 23: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

• Level 5: The negative markers are stressed in L1

but unstressed or less stressed in L2. Pitch

changes occurs on negative markers on L1 but

towards the ends of sentences in L2.

Page 24: Sheila tamizrad  hayati

Conclusion

• Level 6: Words are stressed in L1, but unstressed

or less stressed in L2.

Sheila
Similar to lvl 5
Sheila
the degree of difference corresponds to the degree of distance.
Page 25: Sheila tamizrad  hayati