Upload
ngee-ann-secondary-school
View
768
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Our School of the Future
By Alvin Tan & Terence Tan
The school designs a curriculum that :- value personalised learning- harnesses ICT for effective teaching & learning- provides real world connection through project based learning- inculcates 21st century skills
School of the Future
PastAssessment of LearningSummative AssessmentTeacher-centredStudents as recipients of knowledgeIndustrial-style classroomTextbook as providers of knowledgeChalk BoardTraditional teaching methodsNon-digital learnersWeb 1.0 (read-only web)Mass lecture style
Situational Analysis
PresentAssessment for LearningFormative AssessmentStudent-centredStudents as knowledge creatorsCollaborative classroomInternet as providers of knowledgeInteractive whiteboardICT infused teaching methodsDigital NativesWeb 2.0 tool (read-write web)Personalised learning
Constructivist
Personalized System
Mass customisation
Time variable/ Achievement constant/ Mastery based / variable-pace learning model
Mobile / anywhere and everywhere
Blended learning
Flexible schedule (curriculum) ; anytime
Differentiated instruction
Differentiated and specialized teacher role
Digital Portfolio and exhibition
School of the Future
1. Flexible, Anytime/Everywhere Learning - learning beyond traditional school day through blended learning - virtual educators and simulations can be used ( variable time and constant learning )
2. Redefine Teacher Role and Expand “Teacher” - Facilitator model - other mentors in the community
3. Project-Based/Authentic Learning Opportunities - increase relevance of learning and improve students’ ability to apply knowledge
5 essential elements for School of the Future
4. Student Driven Learning Path - more explicit control to design and determine their curriculum, as well as assessment - learning at a time and pace that works best for individual students
5. Mastery/Competency-Based Progression/Pace - provide opportunity to work at own pace and to reinforce a particular skill or standard until they have mastered the content. - address standard at a time/manner that meets their needs, rather than being taught only when everybody covers a certain topic. - some may accelerate their pace of learning, while others can take additional time to learn.
5 essential elements for School of the Future
Personalized learning requires not only a shift in the design of curriculum and instruction, but a leveraging of modern technologies.
Personalization cannot take place at scale without technology. Personalized learning is enabled by smart e-learning systems, which help dynamically track and manage the learning needs of all students, and provide a platform to access myriad engaging learning content, resources and learning opportunities needed to meet each student’s needs everywhere at any time (Kolderie et al, 2010)
Personalized Learning
ICT is being used as an enabler to : 1. personalized Learning (lesson delivery & Assessment)2. promote acquiring of 21st century skills - Research & Information Fluency - Communication & Collaboration - Critical Thinking & Problem Solving - Creativity & Innovation3. create digital portfolio
Information Communication Technology (ICT)
Effective technology integration for pedagogy on subject content
Bloom’s Taxonomy to guide and assess learner’s understanding
Effective technology integration for pedagogy on subject content
Bloom’s Taxonomy to guide and assess learner’s understanding
Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy using Web 2.0 tools
Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy
Visual Representation
Technological Knowledge (TK)
Effective technology integration for pedagogy on subject content
Teaching for Understanding (TfU) framework, Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligence theory for lesson design
Bloom’s Taxonomy to guide and assess learner’s understanding
Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy using Web 2.0 tools
The theory of multiple intelligences talks about providing eight different potential pathways to learning.
If a teacher is having difficulty reaching a student in the more traditional linguistic or logical ways of instruction, the theory of multiple intelligences suggests several other ways in which the material might be presented to facilitate effective learning.
Howard Garner’s Multiple Intelligence Theory
Pedagogical Knowledge (PK)
The 8 intelligences are :words (linguistic intelligence) numbers or logic (logical-mathematical intelligence) pictures (spatial intelligence) music (musical intelligence) self-reflection (intrapersonal intelligence) a physical experience (bodily-kinesthetic intelligence) a social experience (interpersonal intelligence), and/or an experience in the natural world (naturalist intelligence)
Howard Garner’s Multiple Intelligence Theory
Pedagogical Knowledge (PK)
Laurie Brady & Kerry Kennedy (2010), Curriculum Construction, 4th edition, Pearson Education Australia
Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P (2006) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Extracted from http://tpck.pbwiki.com/
Wolf, M. A. (2010). System Redesign for Personalized Learning. Washington, DC: Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA)
http://gccisdscience.wikispaces.com/Digital+Blooms Gardner, Howard. (1999) "Intelligence Reframed: Multiple
Intelligences for the 21st Century." New York Teaching for Understanding (TfU) framework
http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/tfu/info3.cfm Bloom’s Taxonomy for Ipad
http://langwitches.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Bloom-iPads-Apps.jpg
References