36
Informed Decisions on the Future of OA Scholarly Monograph Publishing in HSS Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections ICOLC, 15 October 2012 @oapenuk #oapenuk

OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

  • Upload
    oapenuk

  • View
    130

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Informed Decisions on the Future of OA Scholarly Monograph Publishing in HSS

Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections

ICOLC, 15 October 2012

@oapenuk #oapenuk

Page 2: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

@oapenuk #oapenuk

58 HSS titles: 2006 - 2011

Experimental Group (29 titles)

Control Group (29 titles)

OA with CC licenceOAPEN Library

Publishers websiteInstitutional RepositoryGoogle Books (100%)

Standard e-book agreements

Publishers websiteE-book aggregators

Google Books (10%)

Print version available for sale E-book device friendly version available for sale

Page 3: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

The research programme

1.How policies, processes and mechanisms need to change in order to enable OA publication of monographs?

2.What are the measurable effects of a move to OA monographs?

3.How do perceptions of OA monograph publication change among participants during the project?

@oapenuk #oapenuk

Page 4: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stewart/461099066/

OAPEN-UK Research PlanEllen Collins, Research Information Network

Research process

Initiation

Year 1 11/12

Year 2 12/13

Year 3 13/14 project close 2015

1. Lit

erat

ure r

eview

2. Ann

ual b

ench

mar

king

surv

ey

4. Ini

tial sc

oping

inte

rview

s

/ sur

vey

3. Ini

tial fo

cus g

roup

s

5. Qua

ntita

tive da

ta

analy

sis6.

Annua

l par

ticipan

t foc

us

grou

ps7.

Plann

ing fo

r yea

r 3

8. Add

ition

al ye

ar 3

activiti

es9.

Final

evalu

ation

and

repo

rt

1. Lit

erat

ure r

eview

2. Ann

ual b

ench

mar

king

surv

ey

4. Su

rvey

s, ca

se st

udies

/

in-de

pth i

nter

view

3. In

itial

focu

s gro

ups

5. Qua

ntita

tive da

ta

analy

sis6.

Annua

l par

ticipan

t focu

s

group

s7.

Plann

ing fo

r yea

r 3

8. Add

itiona

l yea

r 3

activiti

es9.

Final

evalu

ation a

nd

repo

rt

Page 5: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

1. Literature Review

Literature Review V1 available and stay up to date with our Diigo Group: OAPEN-UK

http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/further-reading/

Page 6: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

2. Annual Benchmarking

Baseline survey will provide benchmark to measure how the perceptions and attitudes of project participants change over the course of the project

Baseline results are available at:http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/research-findings/benchmarking-survey/

Page 7: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

3. Focus groups

1. Institutional representatives including librarians, institutional repository staff, research managers

2. Publishers3. Learned Societies4. Researchers (as both authors

& readers)5. E-book aggregators6. Research Fundershttp://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/research-findings/y1-initial-focus-groups/

Page 8: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

4. Surveys, case studies & in-depth Interviews

Survey of HSS researchershttp://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/research-findings/researchersurvey/

Learned Society in-depth interviews

Institutional Case Studies

Publisher in-depth interviews

Page 9: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

About the respondents

Before 1959 1960s 1970s 1980s and onwards Missing0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

23.021.6

27.1

23.0

5.2

Birth decade of survey respondents

Decade

Perc

enta

ge

Page 10: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

About the respondents

PhD

Post-doc

Assista

nt pro

fesso

r

Associa

te pro

fesso

r

Profes

sor

Researc

hers outsi

de acad

emia

Other

Missing

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

26.5

10.3

18.1

14.6

20.3

5.74.2

0.3

Career stage of survey respondents

Career stage

Perc

enta

ge

Page 11: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

About the respondents

UK Rest of Europe North America Rest of world Missing0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.082.3

7.74.3 4.8

0.9

Region of residence of survey re-spondents

Region

Perc

enta

ge

Social sciences Humanities Missing0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

38.8

60.0

1.2

Discipline of survey re-spondents

Discipline

Perc

enta

ge

Page 12: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Open access awareness

Page 13: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Open access awareness

Page 14: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Open access awareness

Page 15: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Creative Commons

Page 16: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Creative Commons

Page 17: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Creative Commons

Page 18: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Creative Commons

Page 19: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Profits from publishing

Page 20: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Author priorities

Page 21: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Author priorities

Page 22: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Publisher choices

Page 23: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Author services

Page 24: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Author priorities

Page 25: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Self-publishing

Page 26: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Active authors funding

Page 27: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Reading habits

Page 28: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Reading habits

Page 29: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Reading habits

Page 30: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Scholarly communications goals

Page 31: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Scholarly communications goals

Page 32: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Scholarly communications goals

Page 33: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Conclusions

• Considerable potential for OAPEN-UK-style open access model – paper and e still required

• Need to increase confidence and understanding of Creative Commons

• A push for CC BY may alienate researchers??• Need to consider future roles• Encourage authors to care more about post

publication elements• Quality is paramount – need to ensure that OA

model tackles negative perceptions

Page 34: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

4b. The monograph publishing process from creation to being in the hands of the reader – process, infrastructure & effort by authors and publishers

Page 35: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Library Consortia

My call to action….

Opportunity to help mould the OA offering in HSS

Help centralise, share, explore and test

Support new OA publishers

Keep it transparent & maintain quality

Collaborate and engage

Page 36: OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012

Thank you & Further Info

OAPEN-UK website:http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/

Twitter:@oapenuk

Diigo Group:OAPEN-UK

Caren [email protected]

Twitter:@carenmilloy

@oapenuk #oapenuk