Upload
jean-pierre-ranschaert
View
362
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Issues in Marke,ng Communica,on:
LIVEr,sing # 5bAdver,sing goes online
part 2
1
the life cycleSOCIAL MEDIA
2
3
Yes, but WHY?
4
5http://www.businessinsider.com/future-of-digital-slides-2012-11#-52
6
• One good reason to engage on SM: SocNet Users More Apt to Engage in Various Consumer Ac,vi,es
• Ac,ve social media users are more likely than the average person to have engaged in a variety of consumer ac,vi,es, whether online or in person, finds a survey [pdf] released in June 2012 by Allstate, in associa,on with Na,onal Journal.
7h"p://www.marke-ngcharts.com/direct/social-‐media-‐users-‐more-‐apt-‐to-‐engage-‐in-‐various-‐consumer-‐ac-vi-es-‐22364/allstate-‐social-‐media-‐users-‐consumer-‐ac-vi-es-‐june2012png/
SocNet Users More Apt to Engage in Various Consumer Ac-vi-esAc-ve social media users are more likely than the average person to have engaged in a variety of consumer ac-vi-es, whether online or in person, finds a survey [pdf] released in June 2012 by Allstate, in associa-on with Na-onal Journal. They are almost 10% more likely than the average respondent to have consulted with friends, family or co-‐workers about a product or service to buy (79% vs. 72%), and 18% more likely to have bought a product or service online (78% vs. 66%). Social media users also pay a"en-on to what others have to say: 64% report having changed their mind about purchasing a product or service because of the opinions of others, compared to 58% of respondents overall. And beyond listening to others, they are keen to have their say too: they are more likely than the average to have par-cipated in groups made up of people concerned about a par-cular product, service, or company (33% vs. 28%).
SocNet Users Consult Several Purchase InfluencersSomewhat unsurprisingly, social media users are more likely than the average to say that when making a new purchase, they give at least some considera-on to comments by other consumers on online forums, comment sec-ons, and social media (72% vs. 59%). They also are more likely to pay a"en-on to online reviews from other consumers (66% vs. 54%) and reviews by bloggers (40% vs. 32%).
Interes-ngly, though, they’re also more apt to pay at least some a"en-on to expert reviews in publica-ons and major newspapers (77% vs. 73%) and adver-sing from companies on TV, signs, online, in print, or in-‐store displays (63% vs. 57%). Conversa-ons with friends, family, or other acquaintances, as well as informa-on shared by these people also play a role more with social media users than the general popula-on.
SocNet Users Want More EngagementData from the Allstate/Na-onal Journal “Heartland Monitor Poll XIII” indicates that 64% of social media users want to see an increase in companies using social media to respond to customer ques-ons and complaints. This may be a reflec-on of the finding that just 1 in 5 users believe corpora-ons are using social media to more easily interact with current and poten-al customers, with 73% instead believing that companies are using social media to more easily adver-se their products and services.
According to a recent report from IBM, though, companies may be paying heed to these consumers’ wishes. 57% of the more than 1,700 global CEOs surveyed an-cipate engaging customers through social media in the next 3-‐5 years, a drama-c increase from just 16% who currently do so. This would make social media one of the dominant customer engagement tools, behind only face-‐to-‐face interac-on, and ahead of websites and call centers.
SocNet Users More Likely to Share ExperiencesConsumers who have used social media for customer service are more engaged and vocal in speaking about their experiences than the general popula-on, says American Express in May 2012 survey results, and the Allstate survey appears to back this finding up.
Further data from the survey reveals that social media users are more likely than the average respondent to have talked about a nega-ve product or service experience in person with friends, family or acquaintances (87% vs. 81%), and also more likely to have posted a review or comment online (47% vs. 34%) and posted something on social media (31% vs. 22%). These findings are significant, considering the importance these users place on reviews and comments when making new purchase decisions.
Luckily, social media users are even more apt to take ac-on ajer a posi-ve experience with a product or service. 56% have posted a review or comment online and 41% have posted something on social media.
Other Findings:61% of social media users want more informa-on from companies about discounts and special offers, compared to 34% who want less.
39% follow companies or products on social media sites.About the Data: The Heartland Monitor Pol was conducted May 19-‐23 via landline and cell phone among a na-onal sample of 1000 adults aged 18 and older. 640 were ac-ve social media users.
8
9
10
11
http://www.slideshare.net/facebooksummitpagekarma/presentation-benjamin-snyers-social-lab-group-ads-ecosystem
12
http://www.slideshare.net/facebooksummitpagekarma/presentation-benjamin-snyers-social-lab-group-ads-ecosystem
13
14http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/direct/social-media-ad-buyers-still-skeptical-about-effectiveness-26596/
Social Media Ad Buyers Still Skeptical About EffectivenessJanuary 30, 2013 by MarketingCharts staff
A survey commissioned by Vizu[download page] of more than 500 US digital marketing and media professionals
finds that 64% will be increasing their paid social media advertising budgets this year, primarily by modest
amounts. While that’s a positive sign of growth for paid social ads, which command only 1-10% of online budgets
for most of the respondents, some issues remain. Namely, presented with a choice of 4 attitudes towards the ads,
less than one-third of the advertisers and agencies polled chose the response indicating that the ads are effective
and produce measurable ROI. (ROI is defined in the report as metric achieved per dollar spent.)
The other response choices and percentages broke down as follows:
■ “I think it moves the needle when combined with other efforts, but I’m not sure how to measure ROI” – 33%
of advertisers and 43% of agencies;
■ “It’s a promising new tactic, but its effectiveness is unknown” – 33% of advertisers and 27% of agencies;
and
■ “I don’t think it works” – 6% of advertisers and 3% of agencies.
Of course, hand-wringing about ROI and social media marketing has been going on for some time. But as the
Vizu survey results make clear, these concerns are affecting potential media buys. That is, 58% of advertisers and
65% of agencies would increase their use of paid social media advertising if there was more clarity about how to
measure ROI. 14% of brands don’t even have someone to monitor the ROI of their paid social media advertising
efforts.
Establishing a clear link between social media advertising and sales would convince 52% of advertisers and 66% of
agencies to increase their use of these ads. A clear link between the ads and brand lift would also do the trick for
46% and 53%, respectively.
About the Data: The Vizu survey was conducted in October 2012 by Digiday.
Topics: Agencies, Buying, Direct, Financial, Interactive, Measurement/Analytics, Online,Online Ad Networks, Signs
of What's to Come, Social Media & Viral Marketing
Social Media
• Social networks• .• .• .
• .• .• .• .
15There is more than just FB
Using Social Media to Listen to ConsumersA Vocal Few Don't Represent the Majority but Could Signify a Larger Issueby Abbey Klaassen
Published: March 30, 2009 NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -‐-‐ If the social-‐media sphere a"acks your brand, do "real people" hear the screams? Not likely, according to surveys that indicate marketers shouldn't rush to quiet every micro-‐outrage that sweeps across the web. Last fall, Johnson & Johnson's Motrin broke crea-ve of a mom complaining that wearing your baby "in fashion," via a sling, can cause back and neck pain. It offended some in the social-‐media sphere, and an army of Twi"ering moms got the brand to yank the ad and issue a mea culpa on its site. But, according to a Lightspeed Research survey, almost 90% of women had never seen the ad. Once they saw it, about 45% liked the video, 41% had no feelings about it, and 15% didn't like it. Even fewer, 8%, said it nega-vely affected their feelings of the brand, compared with the 32% who said it made them like the brand more. Was Motrin's decision to yank the ad and apologize the right one -‐-‐ even if it made the problem go away? Ski"les recently redesigned its website and adopted a sort of "an--‐site." Instead of building a des-na-on, it built an overlay that sat atop several social-‐media communi-es: Twi"er, Facebook, YouTube and Wikipedia. It launched debate -‐-‐ and mischief -‐-‐ in the Twi"erverse as users started pos-ng some-mes-‐naughty comments about the candy to the social-‐media sites. But when private online community Communispace asked more than 300 people if they'd heard of the endeavor, only 6% of a fairly web-‐savvy audience had. The internet has made it easier than ever for consumers to get their opinions heard -‐-‐ and for marketers to listen. But it also creates real challenges: Do marketers know who they're listening to? And at what point does the echo chamber of social media drown out the real opinions of the people who buy your brand? "The data is a really compelling reminder that a lot of our target consumers are not the people who are sitng on Twi"er freaking out over a packaging design that they don't like," said Diane Hessan, CEO of Communispace. She added, "These are people online, having conversa-ons, and yet they are totally out of the loop on stuff us marke-ng junkies love to obsess over." Out of the loopFor example, in the past month, the Twi"er community has been --llated by South by Southwest, AT&T, "Lost" and the redesign of Ski"les.com. Missing from the list are things the Communispace and Lightspeed surveys, both separately commissioned on Ad Age's behalf, found that the general popula-on is fired up about, such as the AIG bonuses and the bank-‐bailout plans. There's also the straight numbers game: While 64% of Communispace respondents had heard of Twi"er, only 6% used it. The Lightspeed responses indicated even fewer users had heard of it (3%), and most of the 58% who had knew of it from someone they know or -‐-‐ get this -‐-‐ TV. At the -me of the Motrin move, Ad Age, per Alexa, reported that only about 0.15% of the world's internet users were on the site, meaning, by the most generous es-mate, about 1.1 million Americans. Communispace found that the more emo-onal responses were about the firestorm and how Johnson & Johnson had responded, not about the actual ad. Of course, it's never a good idea to -ck off even a small group of vocal consumers. But the recent data just reinforce that marketers are "downright ji"ery," Ms. Hessan said. "To some extent they have lost confidence in the thoughvul decisions they've made because an anonymous person can get on some new social-‐media tool and raise ques-ons about quality of decisions." It's not that marketers shouldn't listen and respond to what people are saying about them on the web. Many a company has been improved by responding to vocal online pundits. Look who's talkingBut the surveys do suggest that companies should make sure they know who they're listening to. "Marketers need to know how ac-ve their customers are on social technologies," said Josh Bernoff, VP-‐principal analyst at Forrester Research. Ed Keller, CEO of Keller Fay Group, said his research suggests as much as half of online word-‐of-‐mouth impressions are generated by teenagers; that means an online uproar might mean more for Facebook than it does for Motrin. While online cri-cism may not be cause to act, it can provide companies insight into passionate bases they didn't know they had. "Listening doesn't mean getng one small piece of data and taking ac-on," Ms. Hessan said. "Some-mes it means getng a piece of data and probing further."How to listen and respond more effecJvelyKNOW YOUR CONSUMERS' SOCIAL-‐MEDIA HABITS. "What you see is not necessarily representa-ve of people using the social technologies, but the people using those social technologies and like to talk," said Forrester's Josh Bernoff. HAVE A RESPONSE MECHANISM IN PLACE. Don't wait un-l you have vocal cri-cs to design a response plan. Rather than pulling its ad and issuing an apology on its site that confused the 90% of people who weren't aware of the cri-cism, Motrin could have engaged the angry mob. LOOK FOR CHANGES IN CHATTER. If suddenly the conversa-on doubles, or if people start talking about your brand in a way they weren't the day before, something important is happening. "Changes in attudes are more significant about attudes themselves," Mr. Bernoff said. PINPOINT PASSION. Your cri-cs can provide you with insight into a base you didn't know existed. Who, for example, were these "a"achment paren-ng" moms so outraged by Motrin? Not all cri-cism is cause for ac-on, Communispace's Diane Hessan said. But it is cause to dig deeper.
6 Comments By hypnotype | Bangalore April 1, 2009 02:00:52 am: Interes-ng POV. I agree with kkoonings' comment that Motrin acted in lightning speed before the Motrin issue snowballed into mammoth propor-ons.
Ajer reading this ar-cle, it made me wonder about a couple of per-nent points:
What role do you think a Brand's compe--on possibly plays in inci-ng (or par-cipa-ng in) a riot online?
Do the compe-tors sit back & study the ac-on (to avoid making the same mistakes in the future) or do they actually get involved in the protest (through surrogate means)? Permalink By kkoonings | sea"le, WA March 31, 2009 01:42:16 pm: It is important to listen to all consumer cons-tuencies, however, I think the bigger discussion is how the internet has impacted the world of "crisis management". Communicators ojen believe that you only have 24 hours to control a crisis before it gets out of hand and spreads like wildfire -‐ especially situa-ons that strike at the core of your brand -‐ respect & trust. That's where the "gut-‐meter" comes into play. In those instances, there isn't enough -me to do the research, so a call is made. In the case of Motrin, wai-ng for the data could have been too late to neutralize this outrage.
I'm not sure if there are any recent studies that track and measure the wildfire effect of the internet in crea-ng a crisis. Rumours or "urban myths" that feed on a sense of injus-ce or disrespect have the power to cause mistrust and even boyco"s for a brand. The le"er circula-ng the internet alleging that Starbucks did not support US troops is an example that comes to mind.
Daniel Diermeier, a professor at Kellog, wrote a great case study on crisis management using Mercedes entry into the compact car segment as an example. A few days ajer the car was officially introduced, it rolled over during a test known as the "moose test," conducted by a Swedish journalist. This incident created extensive media coverage in Germany and other European countries. Mercedes, assuring themselves that the test was done incorrectly and that their car was safe, chose to ignore the media stories. But the story of "Mercedes not being safe" was bigger than a technicality in running a test. Not only did it threaten the success of the vehicle's launch but more importantly, the reputa-on of Mercedes Benz.
Rightly or wrongly, Motrin decided that offending a passionate segment of their target was not worth it. No ad, no ma"er how cute some may think, is worth offending the core of whom you are trying to build a trus-ng rela-onship with. I think they were smart to act as they did -‐ with lightening speed. Permalink By mondogrande | Ft Lauderdale, FL March 31, 2009 12:37:56 pm: Manufactured outrage is a component of social media. The vocal minority of malcontents are outraged by anything and everything in order to create a following comprised of others of their ilk. Adver-sers should remember the old adage (pun), "You can please some of the people some of the -me but not all of the people all of the -me."
In my home using the word Twi"er meant was-ng your -me. Apparently this is s-ll true.
h"p://www.proudtoliveinamerica.com Permalink By CC | MILFORD, MA March 31, 2009 11:53:19 am: I couldn't agree more with you on all points. Great to finally have someone putng this out there.
It is cri-cal to listen to what is being said online, but at the same -me don't over react to it either. No ma"er where your customer is talking about you, make sure you are listening and reac-ng smartly and strategically. Permalink By Tom Mar-n | NEW ORLEANS, LA March 30, 2009 08:03:58 am: Abbey
Couldn't agree more. S-ll think Motrin overreacted -‐ link to my Motrin story here on Ad Age ( h"p://budurl.com/MotrinAdAgePost ) and should have held off pulling the campaign. But as one of the mommy bloggers aptly pointed out to me-‐ some of her readers are writers for big na-onal media and her outrage can quickly escalate if her readers jump on the bandwagon. Which is a great point.
All in all though, many marketers, especially those on Twi"er can fall vic-m to the echo chamber effect. Something to be thinking about.@TomMar-n Permalink By ZebraBites | Sydney March 30, 2009 07:34:25 am: Ah yes, sample, sample, sample!
Yes, but HOW?
16
Error #1
17A presence is not a strategyObjec-ves command tac-cs, not the other way roundThe is no social media strategy, or a telephone strategy, …
SocMed basics: A presence is not a strategy
18h"p://socialease.wordpress.com/page/2/
Are you only marke:ng at the :p of the iceberg?Posted on February 9, 2011 by JBBCTake a look at this infographic via TL Marke:ng -‐ an excellent illustra:on of how focussing solely on the tools without enough a"en:on to the strategy underlying it is nothing more than marke:ng at the :p of the iceberg.
Having a presence on social media sites such as Twi"er and Facebook is not, repeat aOer me, not a strategy.
These plaPorms are the tools you employ to help you in your strategy, not the strategy itself. That is why seQng up a corporate Facebook or Twi"er account, just because everyone else is doing it, without a clearly thought out plan will not result in any kind of meaningful success.
Ask yourselves these key ques:ons before jumping onto the social media bandwagon.
1. What are my specific objec:ves for engaging in social media?
2. Who is my audience and where do I find them?
3. How will I engage with them once I am there?
4. What tools can I use most strategically?
5. Do I really understand how these tools work or do I need some social media training?
6. How will these tools fit into the overall communica:ons strategy?
7. Do I have :me to fully engage with these tools?
8. If not, can I iden:fy someone who can?
9. How will I evaluate if the strategy is working?
Make sure you have answered these key ques:ons first and don’t forget to check back in regularly to see if your social media strategy is s:ll in line with your goals and your audience needs.
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Some dynamic elements move this conversa:on forward and prove to be useful ingredients:
listening into social media – to get the pulse / the feel of how media use is changing, how people express themselves, how they intereact with the media and with each other through the media – e.g. blogging has its own tone of voice, which is different from messaging on Facebook, or on LinkedIn, which is different from contents on Twi"er, …listening into your brandscape – what do people say about you, and how can you / need you answer that, posi:ve or nega:ve; this means well-‐known one-‐way communica:on must change into two-‐way communica:on rapidly evolve into mul:-‐way / networked communica:on <cfr. Gavin Heaton’s Skype interview>caring about people – providing content that brings them a real / wanted value; which can only be done aOer careful listeningengaging people, i.e. matching the deliberate value / the care you give people with the appropriate context where the need / want for value arises – that is, evolving from content producers to context producers and ac:ng as experience facilitators <cfr. Mercado Central de Valencia video above and Heineken case>virality – if your brand experience is truly engaging, you can hope for your audience, as small as it may be, to turn into ambassadors for your brand who spread the message you or they have produced – expect them to do so if they are disappointed with your brand experience – which leads us back to the “listening” ingredient in a communica:on loop / spiral
SocMed basics: STRATEGY vs TACTICS
Cy OBJ
StrategyTacJc 2TacJc 1
TacJc 3TacJc N
19
Error #2
20Social media is not about number – not about power – it is about influence and trust
Cfr Klout -‐ Kred
SocMed basics: Social Capital before financial
21Social media is not about number – not about power – it is about influence and trust
Cfr Klout -‐ Kred
Social?
LISTENINGSharing
22
Error #3
23Social media is about giving – don’t speak the ‘sales’ word
SocMed basics: Content strategy
241. Social media is about giving – don’t speak the ‘sales’ word
2. Define your target audience and develop an in-‐depth understanding of their problems and buying ques-ons. à LISTENING3. 2; Figure out the best way to solve your audience’s problems4. Become a trusted source of informa-on for your target audience
5. Develop an online presence that contains relevant content6. Make it easy for your audience to transi-on from learning from you to buying from you.
Error #4
25Online vs Offline = Either / Or -‐ Agencies / campaigns / adver-sers
Digital = separate world from offline –
No: SMARTphones, SMARTcars, SMARTobject: ON & OFF convert
Need to decline the BRAND in an INTEGRATED MULTICHANNEL mode
SocMed basics: ROI measurement
Cy OBJ
StrategyTacJc 2TacJc 1
TacJc 3TacJc N
26
Error #5
27Online vs Offline = Either / Or -‐ Agencies / campaigns / adver-sers
Digital = separate world from offline –
No: SMARTphones, SMARTcars, SMARTobject: ON & OFF convert
Need to decline the BRAND in an INTEGRATED MULTICHANNEL mode
SocMed basics: 90 – 9 -‐ 1
281% producers – 9 % commenters – 90%lurkers/readers BUT: CONTEXT: lurkers may be producers and readers too
Error #6
29There’s only FB, Twi"er, LinkedIn and Foursquare...
30
31
32
33Belgian community of maintaineers – 580 members as of MAY 2012 – illustrates the community over public principle, communicate/narrowcast over broadcast, truxt over numbers
Reasons for the crea-on of a new community/social network h"p://vimeo.com/10307941
34
35
364 Minutes to Op-mize a LinkedIn Profile for SEO -‐ h"p://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/4785/4-‐Minutes-‐to-‐Op-mize-‐a-‐LinkedIn-‐Profile-‐for-‐SEO.aspx
Read more: h"p://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/4785/4-‐Minutes-‐to-‐Op-mize-‐a-‐LinkedIn-‐Profile-‐for-‐SEO.aspx#ixzz1Gw3tItX9
37
the life cycleRICH MEDIA
38
39
• .• .• .
40
Get found: Youtube = SE #2 - build your presenceViral potential (< creativity) + people keep coming back cfr. Old Spice
0 Reasons Why Every Brand Needs Web VideoMegan O'Neill on November 29, 2010 10:45 AM
Is your brand using web video? If not, it should. Here are 10 reasons why every brand needs to jump on the web video bandwagon.
Everyone’s Doing ItOkay, I know you may be thinking to yourself, “If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you do it to?” But the truth of the matter is, more and more brands are starting to use web video, whether they’ve just uploaded a single video to show off their product offering or they’ve uploaded a whole channel worth of viral videos to YouTube. If you don’t have at least one video online you’re going to look like an idiot.
I don’t mean to hurt your feelings, but it’s true. As more and more companies start uploading product demos and other videos to YouTube and other video sites, consumers will start searching on YouTube for these types of videos when they want to find out about a product or company. If your brand doesn’t have a web video presence you’ll be missing out.
Lets You Actually SHOW Your Product/ServiceBut seriously, aside from the fact that everybody else is doing it, there are lots of very valid reasons why you should invest a little bit of time and money in creating a web video presence for your brand. One of the best reasons is that it is a great way to show off your product or service. Sure, you can write a description of your product or service on your company website’s ‘About’ page. But wouldn’t it be better to actually show your customers what you do?
Back in October, Jay Bailey, CEO of Rapidfire Video told us why he thinks every company needs an online video. “I think that there are very few products that don’t need to tell their story in a digestible, concise, (and often, entertaining) way.” So show your customers what you can do in a video. Bailey says, “At the end of the day, someone reaching the home page of any company generally needs more than a few bullets that list features. They’re wondering: Can I trust these guys? Do they get my problem? Is their product as good as the three others I’ve seen? They get answers to these questions when you tell them a story.” And video is one of the best ways to tell your story.
Consumers Prefer Video To ReadingGoing along with the point above, it is important to point out that consumers these days have an aversion to reading lots of text (which is a little bit sad to think about for someone like me who writes for a living, but it’s true nonetheless) . Most people would much rather sit back and watch a video and have your product shown and explained to them than have to read and figure things out for themselves. So why not make it easier for your customers by spelling out what you do in a short, simple, fun and engaging video?
It’s InexpensiveBuilding an online video presence doesn’t have to be expensive. All you need is a web cam, or inexpensive video camera, and an idea to get started. As a matter of fact, when companies get creative and create fun videos on a low budget they often get a lot more coverage for their efforts than the brands that have huge budgets for video campaigns.
Blendtec is a great example of a brand that has really built itself up in the world of web video starting out with a next-to-nothing budget. Blendtec’s own founder, Tom Dickson, hosts the show, which takes place in a kitchen. Dickson blends things that you ordinarily wouldn’t think of blending, to show just how strong and mighty the Blentec blender is. Check out the first episode, uploaded on October 30, 2006 – ‘Will It Blend? – Marbles’.
Of course, Will It Blend has grown a lot over the last few years. They’ve got a fancy sign with flashing lights, they blend things that are a lot more expensive than marbled, and even have celebrity guests. Check out a more recent episode below. But remember, when Blendtec first started, the only things they needed to make their first video were a video camera, a blender and some marbles. Be creative and you can surely come up with a great, inexpensive way to get you brand online in the world of web video.
Lets You Show Your CreativityThe Blendtec example is a great illustration of this next point. When you create videos about your brand, product, service or company you have the opportunity to show off your creativity. Even if your product isn’t creative (like a blender), you can present it in a creative way. This puts smiles on people’s faces and gives them a reason to choose you over your boring competitors who don’t have a creative bone in their bodies.
Car insurance isn’t exactly exciting, funny business. However, Geico has been able to entertain us for years with their humorous commercials and antics. Though most are created for television, several have gone viral on the web. I think Geico is a great role model for companies looking to make their products a little more exciting, humorous and viral.
Keeps Customers Coming BackAnother great thing about web video is that it keeps your customers coming back for more (that is, if you start uploading new content on the regular). By creating a web video series, or uploading fun content on a regular basis, you keep your customers not only coming back to see more but also waiting impatiently to see what you are going to come up with next.
A great example of this is the Old Spice ‘The Man Your Man Could Smell Like Campaign’. And yes, I know that some of you may think that using a huge brand like Old Spice and the most successful online video campaign of all time is unfair. But what do we have to work for if not to be the best, eh? Old Spice first introduced a character, ‘The Man Your Man Could Smell Like’, in a Super Bowl commercial. They then began releasing more television and online ads starring this hunky yet loveable man that everyone wants to be. Then they came out with their Twitter video response campaign where they put out video after video after video, responding to fans. Fans loved it. Everyone was checking in to see if a new video had been uploaded yet and everyone wanted more. This is exactly the type of response you want (even if you can’t achieve it on the same level as Old Spice). I have a few qualms with the fact that Old Spice has retired ‘The Man Your Man Could Smell Like’, but you know what they say – quit when you’re ahead.
Revision3 CEO Jim Louderback is a strong proponent of creating “online video that delivers repeatable, measurable and sustainable views.” He wrote an article in Advertising Age and also spoke with us about how investing in web series and episodic content is much more effective for keeping customers engaged than trying to create a single video in the hopes that it will go viral.
Video Is Incredibly ShareableVideos are being shared constantly on the web – on Twitter, on Facebook, on Reddit, Digg, StumbleUpon and in a ton of other places on the web. The more video content you create, the more shareable content you create. People are a lot less likely to share a link to your website than they are to share a link to the witty, creative and original video you made about your company. And when they share it, people are a whole lot more likely to watch a video (which they can watch directly from their Facebook, New Twitter or StumbleUpon screen) than to click through to visit your website and read all the content on your ‘About Us’ page. Are we agreed?
Viral PotentialI won’t tell you that there is a good chance of your video going viral. In fact, the odds are pretty much slim to nothing. But if you don’t have any videos online then the odds aren’t even slim. They are just plain nothing.
And the truth of the matter is that your video doesn’t even have to go viral to be a success. Would you be happy with 500,000 views? How about 100,000? How about 10,000? Depending on the size of your company and your website, if you get a mere 3,000 people to watch your video that could be more than well worth the time and money that went into making it. And 3,000 views are really not all that difficult to get if your video’s got the right stuff and if you’ve followed all the right steps for maximizing your discoverability and metadata.
Who Would Say No To Additional Presence Online?For those of you that are still sitting there being negative and thinking to yourselves, “I still don’t see why I need to waste my time with web video”, I hate to lecture you but seriously, what’s your problem? When you invest just a little bit of time in creating a few online videos (or even just one!) you are opening up a whole new channel for your online brand presence. When you upload a video to YouTube you are enabling more people to discover your brand, as well as opening up a channel for interactions through comments and video responses, and are spreading brand awareness. Who would say no to that?
Customers Expect ItAnd finally, your customers expect you to have an online video presence. This sort of goes along with the idea that everybody is doing it, but I think it’s important to understand that when all of your competition is doing something then it’s important for you to do it to. When your customers expect, love and want something you should give them what they expect, love and want. So what are you waiting for? Grab your camera and your brainstorming cap and get to work! I can’t wait to see what you come up with.
41
42
http://www.digimedia.be/News/fr/13924/la-belgique-absente-de-la-course-l-internet-hyper-rapide.html
43
hVp://www.jayworld.fr/video-‐360-‐degres-‐web-‐futur-‐innova,on-‐ride-‐snowboard-‐ski-‐2358
45Enfin du nouveau dans l’industrie des technologies de vidéo embarquée ! La vidéo suivante est carrément folle et représente une énorme révolu:on dans le monde de la vidéo sur le Web. L’internaute devient acteur et peut ainsi se déplacer a 360 degrés dans l’image, pendant que la vidéo tourne !
Ce"e technologie offerte par l’entreprise YellowBird permet de changer l’angle de vue du rider pendant qu’il dévale la piste ou enchaîne les tricks. Vous pouvez donc vous balader ou vous voulez dans la vidéo avec votre souris ou en u:lisant les flèches de votre clavier ! Voyez plutôt ci dessous :
Une expérience immersive révolu:onnaire qui amène de nouvelles perspec:ves dans le monde de la video, notamment pour les caméras embarquées lors d’événements spor:fs. On peut donc s’a"endre à voir les prochains grands prix F1 de ce"e manière, ou des marques comme RedBull inves:r dans ce"e technologie de pointe !
46360° video to be used in iPad apps for full immersion: h"p://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/video/2012/feb/01/condi-on-‐one-‐ipad-‐app-‐video-‐immersive
47On compte 75000 vidéos sur Heineken sur Youtube, don’t seules 640 sont payées par la marque. Ce qui laisse 74360 videos non pilotées par la marque. Le consommateur qui tape Heineken sur Youtube a donc seulement 0,8% de chance de voir une vidéo don’t le message est “contrôlé”. Il en va de même de " les grandes marques. Il y a 75800 videos concernant Coca-‐Cola sur Youtube, et 942215 blogs traitent de Coca-‐Cola à un moment ou à un autre. (RIOU, Marke-ng Anatomy, 2009)
48
49
http://simplymeasured.com/freebies/google-analytics-social-traffic#/
the life cycleMOBILE
50
51
http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2012/10/mobile-phones-and-tablets-now-account-for-1-in-8-u-s-internet-page-views/
52http://www.businessinsider.com/future-of-digital-slides-2012-11#-86
53http://www.businessinsider.com/future-of-digital-slides-2012-11#-87
54http://www.businessinsider.com/future-of-digital-slides-2012-11#-93
Where%has%the%«%consumer%»%gone?%
55
56
http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2013/02/an-average-monday-in-the-uk-pcs-for-lunch-tablets-for-dinner/
57h"p://www.digimedia.be/News/fr/12190/apps-‐un-‐nouveau-‐canal-‐pour-‐la-‐rela:on-‐client.html
Apps: un nouveau canal pour la "rela:on client"Neolane entend secouer l’industrie du marke:ng mobile en intégrant les apps mobiles aux autres canaux de la rela:on client. Et ceci grâce à "Mobile App Channel", son dernier ou:l des:né à personnaliser les contenus directement dans les apps ... Histoire de doper le M-‐commerce!
Vous cherchiez à augmenter le poten:el d’engagement cross-‐canal et les taux de conversion de vos campagnes digitales? Ca tombe plutôt bien, car l'éditeur de solu:ons marke:ng Neolane vient de lancer une solu:on qualifiée "d'inédite" et qui promet de renforcer l’efficacité des apps mobiles en les intégrant aux stratégies marke:ng cross-‐canal. En l'espèce, Neolane Mobile App Channel permet aux marketeurs d'agir sur deux leviers : l’envoi de no:fica:ons push individualisées et la personnalisa:on des contenus dans l’app. L’ensemble de ces messages est dès lors personnalisé en one-‐to-‐one et en:èrement coordonné avec la base de données marke:ng, histoire d'assurer la cohérence des campagnes entrantes et sortantes, tous canaux confondus.Autrement dit, la nouvelle solu:on cherche à favoriser les achats des consommateurs mobiles en intégrant l’app mobile d’une entreprise avec sa base de données marke:ng, grâce à l'automa:sa:on de l’exécu:on de campagnes à par:r de no:fica:ons push et contenus dans l’app individualisés, contextualisés et géo-‐personnalisés.Selon l'éditeur, Mobile App Channel serait adapté à de nombreuses stratégies de marke:ng conversa:onnel (marke:ng cross-‐canal, trigger marke:ng) et offre donc de nouvelles possibilités aux marketeurs, comme par exemple la no:fica:on push via des apps mobiles développées sur iOS et Android, envoi d'offres contextuelles et géo-‐personnalisées, analyse du parcours client (de la récep:on de la no:fica:on push jusqu’aux clics dans l’app) ou encore la mesure du taux de réponse des u:lisateurs d’apps.
58
To be conJnued…
59