12
Learning Outcomes at McMaster University Lavinia Oltean, McMaster University Jon Kruithof, McMaster University

Learning Outcomes Assessment

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation given at D2L's Fusion conference in 2014 around the work that our university is doing on Learning Outcomes Assessment.

Citation preview

Page 1: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Learning Outcomes at McMaster University

Lavinia Oltean, McMaster University

Jon Kruithof, McMaster University

Page 2: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Background Story

• Gov’t of Ontario was giving money to various projects around productivity and innovation

• University of Guelph and four other D2L clients (McMaster, Mohawk College, Waterloo, Wilfred Laurier) part of the project to work with D2L to improve Analytics/Insights

Page 3: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Timeline

• September 2013 – submit proposal for funding

• November 2013 – proposal accepted• November 2013 – budget for spending from

April 2013, write a mid term report• March 2014 – budget for spending up until

March • June 2014 – start doing the work

Page 4: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Life Sciences

• Looking for alignment between course & program outcomes

• Fall 2014 – one course, one outcome• Winter 2015 – three courses, five outcomes• Spring/Summer 2015 – five courses, all

outcomes• Fall 2015 – full program

Page 5: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Geography and Earth Sciences

• Looking for alignment between course & program outcomes

• Fall 2014 – four course, two outcomes• Winter 2015 – six courses, three outcomes• Fall 2015 – all courses, all outcomes

Page 6: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Org Structure

Page 7: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Org Structure

• Create “shadow” structure to the Org– In our case Program

• Add competencies at the Org level• Add competencies at the Program level• Add objectives at the Template level• Add activities at the Course Offering level• Connect Offering > Template > Program

Page 8: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Report

Page 9: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Lessons Learned

• Logic of Competencies are too rigid• Year over year? How to manage?• Introduced/Practiced/Mastered classification• Global reporting was slow– Fixed by D2L

• Structure of D2L system can be flexible– Using the DOME/OrgUnit Editor to connect

courses allows for multiple levels of reporting

Page 10: Learning Outcomes Assessment

What’s Next - Engineering

• 140 external standards that need to be assessed per student

• 4 levels of achievement – will be assessed with different competencies… – Problematic as reporting will not recognize two

“distinct” competencies are related (eg. Level 1 – Numeric Literacy and Level 2 – Numeric Literacy)

Page 11: Learning Outcomes Assessment

What’s Next - Continuing Education

• Fall 2014 will compare/contrast same course delivered in a blended approach and a face-to-face approach

Page 12: Learning Outcomes Assessment

Beyond “Next”

• Extending to Nursing, MedRadSci– Both programs have external accreditation that

must be reported to– Both have unique challenges in the types of

information they require• Reporting back to D2L