Upload
unesco-venice-office
View
318
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Risk Management: Concepts, Approaches and Current Thinking. Joseph King, Unit Director, Sites Unit, ICCROM
Citation preview
Introduction to Risk Management: Concepts, Approaches and Current Thinking
Joseph KingBuilding Capacity in Natural Risk Preparedness
for Cultural Heritage Sites in AlbaniaTirana, Albania – 19 April 2011
• Damage from disasters, including to heritage resources, is increasing every year
- Better communication and information
- Wider definition of the term “heritage”
- Larger footprint- Other?
Disaster Risk as a Threat
• Disaster risk vs. other slower acting risks
• Disaster Risk is often expresses with the equation:
Risk = Hazard x Vulnerability
• For Disaster Risk to increase, either the frequency or strength of the hazard must increase or there must be more vulnerability (or both)
What is Disaster Risk and Why Is It Increasing?
• Most common hazards include earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes/typhoons, tsunamis
• Some of these may be increasing due to changes in weather patterns, etc.
Is the frequency or intensity of hazards going up?
Earthquake in L’Aquila, Italy
Tsunamis in Indonesia and Japan
Hurricane Katrina
Copyright © Skip Bolen
Fires in Uganda and Madagascar
Source –http://news.bbc.co.uk
Terror Attach in Mumbai, India
• Lack of Maintenance and poverty
• Inappropriate Restoration
• Rampant Urbanization
• Building where we didn’t in the past
• Loss of traditional knowledge systems
• Vulnerability to secondary hazards
Is our vulnerability Increasing?
• Effective DRM for heritage starts with advance planning and preparation
• DRM should be conceived in ways which have the least impact on the heritage values (including OUV) while ensuring safety
• Advance planning should be conceived in terms of the whole property, and provide integrated concern for its buildings, structures, natural features, and their associated contents and landscapes
• Planning should include multiple for multiple risks• Property occupants and users should be directly involved
in development of emergency-response plans• Following a disaster, every effort should be made to ensure
the retention and repair of structures or features that have suffered damage or loss
Some Key Principles
Disaster Risk Management (DRM) is a cycle for which planning for a disaster (prevention), response to the disaster, and recovery from the disaster must always be in motion
The DRM Cycle
• Improvements within the heritage profession
• Better integration between the heritage profession and the larger disaster reduction community
• Better relationships with local communities and use of their skills and knowledge
How can we improve the situation?
• Coordination of activities• Developing joint tools• Sharing information• Developing serious
research on both “modern techniques” and traditional knowledge systems
• Developing best practices• Developing capacity
building activities
Improvements within the Heritage Profession
• Emphasis on management planning/management systems which take into account disaster risk (DRM)
• Maintenance and simple solutions where applicable
• More complex solutions where necessary and feasible
Improvements within the Heritage Profession
Integrating with larger Disaster Reduction Community
The global Disaster Risk Reduction sector is currently not concerned with the heritage
GLOBAL FIELD OF RISK REDUCTION
HERITAGE
The Heritage sector does not know the “language” of DR
Courtesy of Giovanni Boccardi, UNESCO WHC
• Speaking the same language
• Heritage being accepted as one of many concerns
• Use of heritage as a positive proactive force at the readiness, response, and recovery phases
Integrating with larger Disaster Reduction Community
• Using traditional building materials and techniques of construction
• Using traditional land use planning
• Using existing social/cultural decision- making/leadership
• Learning from local knowledge (myths, taboos, warning systems, planning)
Use of heritage during readiness phase
Use of heritage during readiness phase
Don’t Tear It DownBy Randolph Langenbach
Use of heritage during readiness phase
Use of heritage during response phase
• Using heritage places as meeting points/shelter
• Using existing social/cultural decision- making/leadership structures in response
Use of heritage during recovery phase
• Using traditional knowledge for planning, materials, and know-how
• Using heritage as an economic resource through tourism
• Paying attention to local needs
• Using traditional knowledge systems (community as a knowledge resource)
• Involving communities in all aspects of the process from the beginning (starting with planning)
Improving relations with the Community
New Approaches: World Heritage Strategy
• Purpose‒
Strengthen protection of WH and contribute to sustainable development by integrating heritage into risk reduction policies and incorporate concern for disaster reduction within site Management Plans
‒
Provide guidance to integrate risk reduction into WH strategic planning and management
New Approaches: World Heritage Strategy
• Objectives1. Strengthening institutional support and
governance for reducing risks at World Heritage properties;
2. Using knowledge, innovation and education to build a culture of disaster prevention at WH properties
3. Identifying, assessing and monitoring risks from disasters at WH properties
4. Reducing underlying risk factors at WH properties
5. Strengthening disaster preparedness at WH properties
These follow closely the five priority areas of the Hyogo Framework for Action
First Publication in a New Series of Resource Manuals for World Heritage
Available for download at:http://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/630/http://whc.unesco.org/fr/activities/630/
• What is Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and why is it important?
• What does a DRM plan consist of?• How do you get started?• How do you identify and assess disaster risks?• How can you prevent disaster risks or mitigate their
impact?• How do you prepare for and respond to
emergencies?• How do you recover and rehabilitate your property
after a disaster?• How do you implement, reassess and reappraise the
DRM plan?Table of Contents
• Glossary of Disaster Management Terms• Typology of Hazards• Relevant Charters and Recommendations• International Organizations and Research
Institutions • Key References and Publications
Annexes
The manual is meant to:• give an overall framework and approach to DRM• help site managers develop DRM plans for their
properties
The manual is not meant to:• Give detailed information on every type of hazard or
disaster situation (there is a list of key publications where you can find more information on specific issues)
The Purpose of the Manual
The Disaster Risk Management (DRM) Cycle
Where does DRM Fit Into Overall Planning
These can be separate (but linked) plans or the DRM can be part of the overall
management plan
Possible links include visitor management, community involvement, maintenance and monitoring to name a few
Components of a DRM plan
Relationship of the Plan to the DRM Cycle
• Site manager• Site staff• Local and national government• Community leaders/communities• Local scientists and researchers• Health services• Police, firefighters, and other
emergency response organizations (local and national)
Core Team and Other Key Stakeholders
• Attributes that carry the OUV (SOUV)• Geographical information• Geological, hydrological, meteorological information• Factors and processes for probable hazards (including
probable frequency)• Thematic hazard maps, heritage risk maps, etc.• Disaster histories• Inventories of the heritage and also existing DRM
infrastructure• Existing plans and planning mechanisms for DRM and
more generally for physical planning (at all levels)• Institutions relevant to DRM and heritage• Traditional knowledge systems
Information Needed to Identify Disaster Risks
Macedonia - Zone 3: 10% chance every 50 years of a destructive earthquake.
Delhi’s Seismicity (Seismo‐tectonic Map around Delhi region, (after Sharma 2003) )
Source: Improving the Seismic Resistance of Cultural Heritage Buildings, EU‐India Economic Cross Cultural Programme
24.5
25.5
26.5
27.5
28.5
29.5
30.5
31.5
32.5
74.5 75.5 76.5 77.5 78.5 79.5 80.5 81.5 82.5
Longitude ºE
Latit
ude
ºN
Magnitude < 2 Magnitude 2 to 3 Magnitude 3 to 4 Magnitude 4 to 5 Magnitude 5 to 6 Magnitude > 6 Places
Slide Source: Prof C V R Murthy, IIT Kanpur
Epicenters in and around Delhi Region (100 Years)
Delhi’s Seismicity (cont’d)
Delhi’s HISTORICAL SEISMICITY in brief
Date Magnitude
893 or 894 (Intensity XI, XII) -
15.07.1720 (intensity IX in Delhi) 6.5
01.09.1803 7.0
16.01.1842 5.5
05.03.1842 5.5
26.04.1848 6.0
04.04.1905 8.0
26.02.1906 7.0
14.04.1934 5.0
20.10.1937 6.0
10.10.1956 6.7
27.08.1960 6.0
20.06.1966 Delhi-Gurgaon Border 4.7
15.08.1966 5.6
13.02.1969 5.1
23.03.1984 5.1
Risk Analysis Process
Prioritizing Risks
Writing Disaster Scenarios
• Creative activity to imagine possible disaster scenarios
• Alternative scenarios should be developed• Should be developed based on different types of
likely hazards coming alone or together • Secondary or follow-on hazards should be
considered (e.g. fire after an earthquake)• Should be written as narratives
Planning Areas
• Measures to prevent or mitigate disasters– Ensure actions don’t have negative impact on OUV– Use traditional knowledge systems
• Preparation and response – Planning for the first 72 hours– Roles and responsibilities of team members– Establishing procedures and ensuring emergency
equipment• Recovery and rehabilitation
– Assessing damage – Planning for short and long term recovery– Reviewing the planning and response
Conserving Culture, Promoting Diversity
www.iccrom.org