12
Case Study on Chemical Industries BY: Anish Jain (I056) Aditi Goyal (I057) Prakhar Bhargava (I058) Shreya Galundia (I059) Tushar Gautam (I060)

Final operations management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Final operations management

Case Study on

Chemical Industries

BY:Anish Jain (I056)Aditi Goyal (I057)Prakhar Bhargava (I058)Shreya Galundia (I059)Tushar Gautam (I060)

Page 2: Final operations management

• Founded: 1969• Founder: Dr. Karsanbhai Patel• Products: Consumer products (Soap, Detergents, Salt etc)

Industrial products (Soda Ash, Linear Alkyl Benzene, Sulfuric Acid etc.)• Plants:

• Porbandar (Gujarat)• Bhavnagar • Mehsana• Rajkot • Ahmedabad

Page 3: Final operations management

Porbandar Plant

SODA ASH plantInvestment of Rs. 1140 CroresCapacity is 650,000 TPAEnergy efficient technology from AKZO,

NetherlandsOnly plant in world with full Distributed

Control SystemIndian Chemical Manufacturers

Association(ICMA) award for water management practice in chemical industry

Page 4: Final operations management

Layout

Only one product is madeUses Product LayoutSequence of activitiesEfficiency is moreActivities are done in a sequenceMass production is doneStorage space is less Inflexible manufacturing

Page 5: Final operations management

Tata Chemicals Limited

• Founded: 1939 • Founder: J.R.D. Tata• Products: Chemicals, Fertilizers & Crop Nutrition• Plants:

–Mithapur (Gujrat)– Babrala (UP)– Nanded (Maharashtra)– Haldia (West Bengal)

Page 6: Final operations management

Mithapur Plant

• Location: Mithapur, Gujrat• Products:

– Chemicals: Soda ash, Chloro – Caustic Group, Marine Chemicals, Cement

– Consumer Products: Salt, cooking Soda

• Plant info:– Installed Capacity: 8,75,000 tpa– Largest Producers: Synthetic Soda Ash– 5 Star Rating from the British Safety Council

Page 7: Final operations management

Mithapur Plants – Early Days

• Used Process Layout– Why ?

• Demand: not Stable• Volume: Low• High Flexibility• Workers: Varied Skills

• Need to Change the Layout– Addition of new Products– Addition of new Product Line– Efficiency: Low

Page 8: Final operations management

Mithapur Plant - Today

• Uses Product Layout–Why ?• Demand: Stable• Volume: High• High Efficiency•Workers: Limited Skills

Page 9: Final operations management

Comparison

•Mission:TATA CHEMICALS: Serving society through scienceNIRMA: Providing value for money to customers

•Operation Strategy:TATA CHEMICALS: Moved from Top Down perspective to

Market led perspectiveNIRMA: Moved from Top Down to Bottom Up approach

Page 10: Final operations management

•Organization Type:TATA CHEMICALS: Externally Neutral & Externally SupportiveNIRMA: Internally Neutral & Internally Supportive

• Capacity: Tata Chemicals (Mithapur): 875,000 tpa Nirma : 650,000 tpa

Comparison

Page 11: Final operations management

Competitive Priorities

• Cost• Quality• Flexibility

Page 12: Final operations management