Upload
quarker
View
120
Download
8
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Designing an Online Curriculum ~ What can go wrong. Includes addressing the problem with a hesitant instructor & adding interactivity to a static curriculum.
Citation preview
Group 4 - Elements of Online Curriculum & Programs: What Can Go Wrong In A Government Setting
Presented By: Cynthia V. Anderson M.A. ~ Caitlin Crossman B.S.
EDTC 5840 Designing an Online Curriculum
Your Face-to Face Facility & Manual
Can Be ProblematicInstructor ReadinessStatic Online Curriculum
Moving To An Online Environment
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
2
~Stay Calm~Addressing The Problem of Instructor Readiness/ Static Online Curriculum
Overview of Presentation• Presenter Credentials & Message• Stay Calm ~ Teacher Hesitancy in Embracing Online Learning Presenter: Caitlin Crossman
• Stay Calm ~ Transforming your current static curriculum to interactive experiences. It’s easier than you think! Presenter: Cynthia V. Anderson
• Works Cited
3
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Welcome & IntroductionsYour Presenters:
Caitlin Crossman B.S. in Elementary Education; Teacher 4th grade in the Kirkwood School District – St. Louis MO; B.S. Elementary Education
Cynthia V,. Anderson MA Communication Management; MC Nonprofit Management; BA Media Communications; AA Graphic Design – St. Louis, MO
Presenter Introductions
Caitlin Crossmanon “Instructor Readiness”
Cynthia V. Andersonon “Static Curriculum”
4
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Switching Focus On Web-based Interactions From Face-to-face Can Be Problematic.
What Can Go Wrong: A Hesitant Instructor
Human factors• Instructor’s knowledge of
course materials• Instructor’s prompt
communication with students• Instructor’s constructive
feedback on student work• Instructor’s timely feedback on
student work
Design factors•Course content based on learning outcomes•Useful learning materials•Clear guidelines and rubrics•Assignment examples
Factors of Success in ANY Learning Environment
9
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Switching Focus On Web-based Interactions From Face-to-face Can Be Problematic.
What Can Go Wrong: A Hesitant Instructor
Technical factors• Online distribution of materials• Useful multimedia• Discussion board feature• Timely technical
assistance/support• User-friendly course delivery
system
Factors of Success in an Online Learning Environment
6
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Switching Focus On Web-based Interactions From Face-to-face Can Be Problematic.
Solution: Follow Current Best Practices and Tackle
New Practices in Steps
• Seek out training
• Consider functionality
• Consider accessibility
• Determine the Level of Lowest Common Technology
Embracing the Technical Aspects- Step 1: AssessingAvailable Technologies
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
7
Switching Focus On Web-based Interactions From Face-to-face Can Be Problematic.
Solution: Follow Current Best Practices and Tackle
New Practices in Steps
• Develop rubrics
• Collect past student submissions for exemplars
• Consider transforming old class content
Embracing the Technical Aspects- Step 2: Determine Learning Outcomes
8
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Switching Focus On Web-based Interactions From Face-to-face Can Be Problematic.
What Can Go Wrong: A Static Online Curriculum
Solution: Interactivity
• Has a major impact on the quality of online distance learning programs (Muirhead, 2001)
• The Most Difficult Aspect = Building In Interaction
• The Most Important Aspect = Building In Interaction
Builds a sense of community
Exposes students to a variety of learning resources
Students are more actively engaged in the learning process (Brown, 2001).
9
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Stay Calm ~ Transforming your Static Curriculum to Interactive Experiences. It’s easier than you think!
Problem: Static Curriculum 3 Types of interaction strategies for success
• Learner-to-Content interacting with the content
• Learner-to-Instructor motivating the student to learn
• Learner-to-Learner student interactions with peers Moore (1993)
10
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Learner - Content Interaction
Intellectually Interacting With Content = Changes in the learner mind (Worcester Polytechnic Institute)
•Understandings•Perspectives•Cognitive Structure
Benefit To The Student•1 format does not meet all learning styles
•A variety of formats eliminates monotony
11
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Learner - Content Interaction
Intellectually Interacting With Content = Changes in the learner mind
•Understandings•Perspectives•Cognitive Structure
Provide Resource Links to online resources
Benefit To The StudentAllows students to explore the topic in more depth
12
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Learner – Instructor Interaction
Stimulates & Motivates•Conversational language creates a welcoming atmosphere…
•Reinforces understandings•Provides feedback•Example Walk through expectations with a recorded video via:
Enhanced Syllabus
13
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Learner – Learner Interaction A sense of A Community = Valuable Resource
Student Introductions
Students become joint problem solvers as a community
Group Work
14
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Our Hope, is that through our joint efforts we have presented information that will lead to student:
SatisfactionRetention Increased Learning
~ A quote from Dr. Michael Simonson ~15
Thank You!
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Michael Simonson, Ph.D.
“Ingenuity might be required to use some of these techniques at a distance, but the end result offers opportunities to broaden and invigorate the educational experience for both the learner and the instructor!”
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
16
http://www.fgse.nova.edu/itde/faculty/simonson/ppt/interaction.ppt
Works CitedBaghdadi, Ziad D. (2011). Best practices in online education: Online instructors, courses, and administrators. Turksih Online Journal of Distance Education, 12, 109-117.
Brown, R. E. (2001, September). The process of community-building in distance learning courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Retrieved October, 2014.
Lee, Joohi. (2014). An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 111-132.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 12-24). London: Routlege.
Muirhead, B. (2001). Interactivity research studies. Educational Technology & Society, 4(3). Retrieved June 20, 2005.
Simonson, M. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc
Worcester Polytechnic Institute. (n.d.). Incorporating Interaction Into Your Distance Learning Course. Retrieved October 2014, from Academic Technology Center: http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/ATC/Collaboratory/Teaching/interaction.html
17
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
Image Credits
Copyright © 2014 Anderson & Crossman
18
http://www.pinterest.com/pin/176344141631923220/
http://www.iconarchive.com/show/mega-pack-2-icons-by-ncrow/Format-Factory-icon.html
http://amhistory.si.edu/polio/images/icons/explore.gifhttp://pmg-sb.halfoffdeals.com/images/secondary/133415.jpg
https://worldclassroom.webster.edu/courses/1183154/pages/introductory-video-what-to-expect?module_item_id=10115209 & photo complements of cva
Complements of CVA
(http://blogs.skype.com/2014/04/28/skype-loves-bringing-groups-together-with-free-group-video-calling
Permission granted for presentation use
http://www.nova.edu/~simsmich/index.htm
Thank You & Well Wishes from Group 4!
Presenters: Cynthia Anderson & Jessica Crossman
EDTC 5840 Designing an Online Curriculum