30
Static stress changes--Coulomb

Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

Static stress changes--Coulomb

Page 2: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

SPRING BRICKWINCH

Force Balance – Brick will not move until:

Force on spring Force resisting motion(its length change x its stiffness) (the weight of the brick x friction on surface)

Modeled after Ross Stein’s Coulomb Training I

Hypothesis: Faults interact by the transfer of stress

EARTHQUAKE! (only if stick-slip)

-Lisa Walsh

Page 3: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

SPRING BRICKWINCH

Modeled after Ross Stein’s Coulomb Training I

BRICKSPRING

• Add another spring & brick• If you start cranking winch, PURPLE will move first. Then tension on spring will move GREEN.

EARTHQUAKE! EARTHQUAKE!

Source fault Receiver fault

= shear stress change + (coefficient of friction x normal stress change)

ΔCFS = Δτs+μ' Δσn

Coulomb stress calculationCoulomb

stress change

+ ΔCFS = closer to failure- ΔCFS = farther from failure

-Lisa Walsh

Page 4: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

Key concepts:•Source faults•Receiver faults•Optimally oriented faults•Assume receiver faults are close to failure•Triggering lag time is a problem

Page 5: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

Change of coulomb stress on faults of specified orientation

Can change spatiallyRemote: Sremote

Induced: Sinduced

Total:Sremote+Sinduced

Can change spatially

Page 6: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

From King et al (BSSA, 1994)

Page 7: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

From King et al (BSSA, 1994)

Page 8: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

From King et al (BSSA, 1994)

Page 9: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

Change of coulomb stress on faults of optimal orientation

Page 10: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Todal et al (JGR, 2005)

Page 11: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Todal et al (JGR, 2005)

Page 12: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Todal et al (JGR, 2005)

Page 13: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Todal et al (JGR, 2005)

Page 14: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

Stress changes are permanent but seismicity is not

from Todal et al (JGR, 2005)

Page 15: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

LosAngelesLosAngeles

Big Bear M = 6.5 (2nd - 3 hrs later)

Big Bear M = 6.5 (2nd - 3 hrs later)

Landers M = 7.3Landers M = 7.3(1(1stst))

First 3 hr of Landers

aftershocks

plotted

First 3 hr of Landers

aftershocks

plottedfrom Stein (Nature, 2003)

1992 - Landers earthquake triggered Big Bear earthquake 3 hrs later!

Stress trigger zone

Stress Shado

w

Page 16: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

LosAngelesLosAngeles

Hector Mine Hector Mine

First 7 yr of

aftershocksplotted

First 7 yr of

aftershocksplotted

…and promotes the M=7.1 Hector Mine shock 7 years later (1999).

from Stein (Nature, 2003)

Page 17: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR, 2004)

Page 18: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR, 2004)

Page 19: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR, 2004)

Page 20: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR, 2004)

Page 21: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR, 2004)

Page 22: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR,

2004)

Page 23: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR,

2004)

Page 24: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

from Lin & Stein (JGR,

2004)

Page 25: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer
Page 26: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer
Page 27: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer
Page 28: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer
Page 29: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer
Page 30: Earthquake Static Stress Transfer

http://quake.usgs.gov/research/deformation/modeling/animations/index.html