53
Comparative Total Syntheses of Strychnine N O O N H H N N O O H H H H MacMillan Group Meeting Nathan Jui July 22, 2009 References: Pre-Volhardt: Bonjoch Chem. Rev. 2000, 3455. Volhardt J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 9324. Martin J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 8003. Bodwell Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 3261. Mori J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 9801. Shibasaki Tetrahedron 2004, 9569. Padwa Org. Lett. 2007, 279. Woodward Tetrahedron, 1963, 247. Magnus J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 8116. Overman J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 5776. Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1993, 7490. Rawal J. Org. Chem. 1994, 2685. Bosch, Bonjoch Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 655. Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1998, 9427. Fukuyama J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 10246. A B C D E F G

Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Comparative total syntheses of strychnine MacMillan Group Meeting July 22, 2009 http://www.princeton.edu/chemistry/macmillan/

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparative Total Syntheses of Strychnine

N

O O

N

H H

N

N

O

O

HH H

HMacMillan Group Meeting

Nathan Jui

July 22, 2009

References: Pre-Volhardt: Bonjoch Chem. Rev. 2000, 3455.

Volhardt J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 9324.

Martin J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 8003.

Bodwell Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 3261.

Mori J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 9801.

Shibasaki Tetrahedron 2004, 9569.

Padwa Org. Lett. 2007, 279.

Woodward Tetrahedron, 1963, 247.

Magnus J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 8116.

Overman J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 5776.

Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1993, 7490.

Rawal J. Org. Chem. 1994, 2685.

Bosch, Bonjoch Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 655.

Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1998, 9427.

Fukuyama J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 10246.

A B

CD

E

FG

Page 2: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

History and Structure of (!)-Strychnine

N

O O

N

H H

! 24 skeletal atoms (C21H22N2O2)

! 7-rings, 6-stereocenters

! Spirocenter (C-7)

! CDE ring system

! Hydroxyethylidine

"For it's molecular size it is the most complex substance known." -Robert Robinson

! Isolated in pure form in 1818 (Pelletier and Caventou)

! Structural Determination in 1947 (Robinson and Leuchs)

! Over 250 publications pertaining to structure

Strychnos nux vomica

! Notorious toxin (lethal dose ~10-50 mg / adult)

! Commonly used rodent poison

! Isolated in pure form in 1818 (Pelletier and Caventou)

! Structural Determination in 1947 (Robinson and Leuchs)

! Over 250 publications pertaining to structure

! Notorious poison (lethal dose ~10-50 mg / adult)

! $20.20 / 10 g (Aldrich), ~1.5 wt% (seeds), ~1% (blossoms)

Page 3: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

History and Structure of (!)-Strychnine

N

O O

N

H H

! 24 skeletal atoms (C21H22N2O2)

! 7-rings, 6-stereocenters

! Spirocenter (C-7)

! CDE ring system

! Hydroxyethylidine

"For it's molecular size it is the most complex substance known." -Robert Robinson

"If we can't make strychnine, we'll take strychnine" -R. B. Woodward

Page 4: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Structural Determination of Strychnine: Degredation Studies

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OH

StrychnineIsostrychnineWeiland-Gumlich

aldehyde

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

Isostrychnine Wieland-Gummlich aldehyde

Woodward Magnus

OvermanKuehne

Kuehne

Stork

Rawal*

Bonjoch/Bosch

Martin

Volhardt

Bodwell

Mori

Shibasaki

Fukuyama

Padwa**

! Degredation studies yielded Isostrychnine and the Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

! Both were later discovered to be natural products, serve as ultimate targets for synthesis

28% yield*

80% yield**

Page 5: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

1818

Strychnine isolated

in pure form

Strctrure determination

complete

1947

1954

Woodward

1800 1900

1992-2007

other 14

Total Syntheses of Strychnine Over Time

1990 2000 2010

Ove

rman

, Kue

hne

Raw

al

Kuehn

e

Bosch

Volha

rdt

Mar

tin

Mor

i, Bod

wel

l, Shi

basa

ki

Fukuy

ama

Padwa

Magnus,

Sto

rk

! Fourteen of the fifteen syntheses were disclosed within the last 17 years (since 1992)

2000

Page 6: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

1818

Strychnine isolated

in pure form

Strctrure determination

complete

1947

1954

Woodward

1800 1900

1992-2007

other 14

Total Syntheses of Strychnine Over Time

1990 2000 2010

Ove

rman

, Kue

hne

Raw

al

Kuehn

e

Bosch

Volha

rdt

Mar

tin

Mor

i, Bod

wel

l, Shi

basa

ki

Fukuy

ama

Padwa

Magnus,

Sto

rk

! Fourteen of the fifteen syntheses were disclosed within the last 17 years (since 1992)

2000

Woodward: 28 steps, 0.00006% yield

Stork: 14 steps, unknown yield (unpublished)

Magnus: 28 steps, 0.03% yield

Overman: 24 steps, 3% yield

Page 7: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman's Retrosynthetic Analysis (1992)

NH

HO O

N

H H

Weiland-Gumlich

aldehyde

! Overman targets Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde via aza-Cope-Mannich

NH

CO2Me

N

H H

OH

N

H

OtBu

O

NR2

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

NO

OtBu

NR2

Reduction

aza-Cope-

Mannich

indoline

formation

N

O O

N

H H

Strychnine

Overman J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 9293.

Page 8: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman's Retrosynthetic Analysis (1992)

NH

HO O

N

H H

Weiland-Gumlich

aldehyde

! Overman targets Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde via aza-Cope-Mannich

NH

CO2Me

N

H H

OH

N

H

OtBu

O

NR2

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

NO

OtBu

NR2

Reduction

aza-Cope-

Mannich

indoline

formation

N

O O

N

H H

StrychnineNR2

OtBu

NR2O

O

NR2

tBuO

OTIPS

NR2

tBuO

OTIPS

SnMe3

I

tBuO

OTIPS

O

OCO2Me

OAc

O

tBuOOEt

O

OAc

OAc

Pd-catalyzed

carbonylative

coupling

enzymatic

resolution

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

Tsuji-

Trost

Page 9: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman: Early Construction of Trans-Hydroxyethylidine Unit

O

OAc

ONa

OtBu

EtO2CO

MeO

Pd2(dba)3, PPh3

(91%, 1:1 dr)OAc

O

EtOO

OtBu

H

2. ClCO2Me (97%)

OAc

OAc

1. EEAC (46%)

NaCNBH3, TiCl4

THF, -78 ˚C

OAc

EtO2C

OtBu

HOHH

anti:syn >20:1

DCC, CuCl

(97%)

PhH, 80 ˚C

OAc

OtBu

H

EtO2C

(91%)

30:1 E:Z

! Enzymatic resolution grants access to enantiopure starting material (>99% ee)

! Anti-selective ketone reduction allows for highly selective formation of E-olefin

3-steps from Cp

Page 10: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman: Stereoselective Ethylidine Construction

OAc

O

EtOO

OtBu

H

97,% anti:syn >20:1

! 7-Membered chelate affords needed rigidity for stereoselective hydride delivery

OAc

EtO

O

O

O

Ti

tBu

OAc

EtO

O

O

O

Ti

tBu

H H

H H

OAc

H

EtO2C H OH

OtBu

OAc

H

EtO2C H OH

OtBu

(1:1 dr)

H

TiCl4+

+

H

Page 11: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman: Stereoselective Ethylidine Construction

OAc

O

EtOO

OtBu

H

! DCC promoted stereospecific dehydration sets olefin geometry

(1:1 dr)

H

+

NaCNBH3, TiCl4

THF, -78 ˚C

(97%)

DCC, CuCl

PhH, 80 ˚C

OAc

HEtO2C

HO

OtBu

NHC6H11N

C6H11

OAc

HEtO2C

HO

OtBu

NHC6H11N

C6H11

OAc

OtBu

H

EtO2C

(91%)

OAc

H

EtO2C H OH

OtBu

OAc

H

EtO2C H OH

OtBu

+

30:1 (E:Z)

Page 12: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman: Building the Key Aza-Cope-Mannich Intermediate

OAc

OtBu

H

EtO2C

! Palladium catalyzed carbonylative aniline coupling forms requisite enone

DIBAL

95%

1. TIPS-Cl

(85%)

2. Jones oxid.

(97%)OH

OtBu

H

OH

OtBu

H

OTIPS

O

OtBu

H

OTIPS

R

L-Selectride

PhNTf2, -78 ˚C

Pd(PPh3)4, Me6Sn2

(80%)

R = OTF

R = SnMe3(79%)

OtBu

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

I

Pd2(dba)3, Ph3As

CO (50 psi), 70 ˚C

(80%)

N

N

NMe

Me

O

NR2

NR2 =

Page 13: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman: Finishing the Key Aza-Cope-Mannich Intermediate

! Palladium catalyzed carbonylative aniline coupling forms requisite enone

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

tBuOOH

Triton B, -15 ˚C

(91%, >30:1 dr)

NR2

OtBu

NHO

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

O

N

N

NMe

Me

O

NR2:

NMe

Bn

MeMe

OH

Triton B:

1. Ph3P=CH2

2. TBAF

3. MSCl, LiCl

4. H2NCOCF3, NaH

(68%)

H

NH

NR2

O

OtBu OtBu

O

CF3

OtBu

O

F3C

1. NaH, PhH, 100 ˚C

2. KOH, EtOH, 60 ˚C

(75%)

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

H

Overman: Finishing the Key Aza-Cope-Mannich Intermediate

! Palladium catalyzed carbonylative aniline coupling forms requisite enone

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

tBuOOH

Triton B, -15 ˚C

(91%, >30:1 dr)

NR2

OtBu

NHO

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

O

N

N

NMe

Me

O

NR2:

NMe

Bn

MeMe

OH

Triton B:

1. Ph3P=CH2

2. TBAF

3. MSCl, LiCl

4. H2NCOCF3, NaH

(68%)

H

NH

NR2

O

OtBu OtBu

O

CF3

OtBu

O

F3C

1. NaH, PhH, 100 ˚C

2. KOH, EtOH, 60 ˚C

(75%)

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

H

Overman: Finishing the Key Aza-Cope-Mannich Intermediate

! Palladium catalyzed carbonylative aniline coupling forms requisite enone

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

tBuOOH

Triton B, -15 ˚C

(91%, >30:1 dr)

NR2

OtBu

NHO

H

OTIPS

O

NR2

O

N

N

NMe

Me

O

NR2:

NMe

Bn

MeMe

OH

Triton B:

1. Ph3P=CH2

2. TBAF

3. MSCl, LiCl

4. H2NCOCF3, NaH

(68%)

H

NH

NR2

O

OtBu OtBu

O

CF3

OtBu

O

F3C

1. NaH, PhH, 100 ˚C

2. KOH, EtOH, 60 ˚C

(75%)

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

H

Page 14: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Overman: Key Aza-Cope-Mannich Cascade Forges Strychnine Core

! Single step constructs BCD ring system in nearly quantitative yield

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

H

(CH2O)n

CH3CN N

HO

NR2

OtBu

N

HO

NR2

OtBu

NO

OtBu

NR2

N

HO

NR2

Na2SO4

80 ˚C

(98%)

MeO CN

O

LDA, -78 ˚C

N

HMeO2C

HO

N

NNMeMe

O

NH

CO2Me

N

H

HCl, MeOH

reflux

tBuO

tBuOOH

Page 15: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization set final stereocenters

Overman: Completion of the Natural Product

N

NH

H

CO2Me

OH

N

NH

H

H

OH

CO2Me H

H+ Zn, H2SO4

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Zn, H2SO4

MeOH, 65 ˚C

NaOMe

MeOHH H

Page 16: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization set final stereocenters

Overman: Completion of the Natural Product

N

NH

H

CO2Me

OH

N

NH

H

H

OH

CO2Me H

H+ Zn, H2SO4

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Zn, H2SO4

MeOH, 65 ˚C

NaOMe

MeOHH H

Page 17: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization set final stereocenters

Overman: Completion of the Natural Product

N

NH

H

CO2Me

OH

N

NH

H

H

OH

CO2Me H

H+ Zn, H2SO4

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Zn, H2SO4

MeOH, 65 ˚C

NaOMe

MeOHH H

Page 18: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

N

N

H CO2Me

OH

H

N

N

H H

OH

CO2Me

NaOMe

68%

(2-steps)

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization set final stereocenters

Overman: Completion of the Natural Product

N

NH

H

CO2Me

OH

N

NH

H

H

OH

CO2Me H

H+ Zn, H2SO4

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Zn, H2SO4

MeOH, 65 ˚C

NaOMe

MeOHH H

Page 19: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

DIBAL

NH

HO O

N

H HCH2Cl2, -90 ˚C

N

O O

N

H HNaOAc, CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, AcOH, 110 ˚C

(75%) (77%)

Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

(!)-Strychnine

24 steps, 3% overall yield

(68%)

DIBAL

NH

HO O

N

H HCH2Cl2, -90 ˚C

N

O O

N

H HNaOAc, CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, AcOH, 110 ˚C

(75%) (77%)

Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

(!)-Strychnine

24 steps, 3% overall yield

(68%)

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization set final stereocenters

Overman: Completion of the Natural Product

N

NH

H

CO2Me

OH

N

NH

H

H

OH

CO2Me H

H+ Zn, H2SO4

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Zn, H2SO4

MeOH, 65 ˚C

NaOMe

MeOHH H

Page 20: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization correctly set final stereocenters

Many Routes Utilize the Same Endgame

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

HO O

N

H H

N

O O

N

H H

NaOAc, CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, AcOH, 110 ˚C

Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

Strychnine

Common Intermediate

1. Zn, H2SO4, or NaBH(OAc)3

2. NaOMe or NaH, MeOH, rt

3. DIBAL, CH2Cl2 or toluene

! 9 Routes go through the Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

! 6 Use the same sequence to set sterochemistry:

*Calculated using Overman's yields.

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

Page 21: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Tandem Mannich-[3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement-Mannich reaction

Kuehne's Plan for Strychnine

N

O O

N

H H

Strychnine

NH

CO2Me

NH

Bn

H

O

OMe

OMe

NH

N

OMe

OMe

Bn

CO2Me

NH

N

OMe

OMe

Bn

CO2Me

NH

NBn

CO2Me

OMe

OMeH

H+

NH

NBn

OMe

OMeCO2Me

H

racemic: Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1993, 7490.

! Tandem Mannich-[3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement-Mannich reaction

Kuehne's Plan for Strychnine

N

O O

N

H H

Strychnine

NH

CO2Me

NH

Bn

H

O

OMe

OMe

NH

N

OMe

OMe

Bn

CO2Me

NH

N

OMe

OMe

Bn

CO2Me

NH

NBn

CO2Me

OMe

OMeH

H+

NH

NBn

OMe

OMeCO2Me

H

racemic: Kuehne Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 395.racemic: Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1993, 7490.

Page 22: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Tryptophan-derived starting material would allow for enantioselective synthesis

Kuehne's Retrosynthetic Analysis of the Common Intermediate

N

O O

N

H H

Strychnine

NHMeO2C

H

O

enantioselective: Kuehne J. Org. Chem. 1998, 9427.

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Common Intermediate

wittig

N-alkylation

NH

CO2Me

NHH

O

X

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

Bn

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

BnMeO2C

CO2Me

NHBn

Me

tandem

reaction

! Tryptophan-derived starting material would allow for enantioselective synthesis

Kuehne's Retrosynthetic Analysis of the Common Intermediate (1998)

N

O O

N

H H

Strychnine

NHMeO2C

H

O

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Common Intermediate

wittig

N-alkylation

NH

CO2Me

NHH

O

X

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

Bn

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

BnMeO2C

CO2Me

NHBn

Me

tandem

reaction

Page 23: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Ester stereocenter allows for complete stereoselectivity (3 new stereocenters)

Kuehne: Diastereoselective Mannich-[3,3]-Mannich Cascade

NH

CO2Me

H

OCO2Me

NHBn

Me

1 equiv. C6H5COOH

(1.2 equiv)

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

BnMeO2C

NH

N

Bn

Me

E

H

CO2Me

NH

NBn

CO2MeMe

NH

NBn

CO2MeMe

Me

NBn

NH

E

NH

NBn

CO2MeH

NH

N

Bn

E

H

E

Me

H

H

5 steps (76% yield)

84% yield, >99% ee, >95% de

Page 24: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! !-Aminonitrile reduction with KBH4 removes the chirality source

Kuehne: Further Elaboration of the Cascade Product

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

BnMeO2C

NH

CO2Me

NH

Me

Bn

NH

CO2Me

NH

CHO

Bn

(66%)

K2OsO4

KIO4

SnBu3 O O

1. n-BuLi, THF, -78 ˚C

2. NCS, Me2S, Et3N, -20 ˚C

(56%)

(62%)

1. NH3, MeOH

2. TFAA, Et3N

3. KBH4, 75 ˚C

NH

CO2Me

NH

O

OH

Bn

3. p-TSA, THF, H2O, rt

Page 25: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! N-Alkylation reaction forms D-ring via ammonium reduction

Kuehne: Completion of the Common Intermediate

NH

CO2Me

NH

O

OH

Bn1. TS2O, DMAP, NEt3

NH

CO2Me

NH

O

OTs

Bn

NH

CO2Me

N

H

O

BnOTs

NH

CO2Me

N

H

O

then MeOH, 60 ˚C

2. H2, Pd/C, MeOH

(91%)

Ts2O

MeOH

H2, Pd/C

Page 26: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! N-Alkylation reaction forms D-ring via ammonium reduction

Kuehne: Completion of the Common Intermediate

NH

CO2Me

NH

O

OH

Bn1. TS2O, DMAP, NEt3

NH

CO2Me

NH

O

OTs

Bn

NH

CO2Me

N

H

O

BnOTs

NH

CO2Me

N

H

O

then MeOH, 60 ˚C

2. H2, Pd/C, MeOH

(91%)

Ts2O

MeOH

H2, Pd/CEtO P

O

OMe

O

EtO

KHMDS, THF NH

CO2Me

N

H CO2Me(64%, 17:1 (E:Z))

2 equiv. BF3•OEt2

3 equiv. DIBAL

-78 ˚C, CH2Cl2

(91%)

NH

CO2Me

N

H OH

Common Intermediate

(!)-Strychnine (19 steps, 3% overall yield)

Page 27: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization correctly set final stereocenters

Many Routes Utilize the Same Endgame

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

HO O

N

H H

N

O O

N

H H

NaOAc, CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, AcOH, 110 ˚C

Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

Strychnine

Common Intermediate

1. Zn, H2SO4, or NaBH(OAc)3

2. NaOMe or NaH, MeOH, rt

3. DIBAL, CH2Cl2 or toluene

! 9 Routes go through the Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

! 6 Use the same sequence to set sterochemistry:

*Calculated using Overman's yields.

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

Page 28: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Bonjoch and Bosch: Retrosynthetic Analysis

! Diastereoselective reductive amination would induce asymmetry, vinylation to set core

N

O O

N

H H

Strychnine

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Common Intermediate

N

H

OTBS

O

NO2

indoline

formation

N

O

NO2

HI OTBS

N

O

NO2

H

Ph

MeH

O

O

NO2

Heck

Bonjoch and Bosch Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 395.

Page 29: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Bonjoch and Bosch: Disapointing Double Reductive Amination

! Preparation of the required vinyl iodide substrate has a rough beginning

N

O

NO2

HCl

N

O

NO2

H

Ph

MeH

O

O

O

HO

O4 steps

49% yield

H

ClH3N

Ph

H

Me

NaCNBH3, IPA

(37%, 8% trans)

NO2

N

O

NO2

H

O

Me

Cl

Cl

O

Cl

Me

135 ˚C, (72%)

1. TMSI, HMDS, -20 ˚C

2. PhSeCl, THF, (70%)

3. O3, CH2Cl2, -78 ˚C

4. IPr2NH, (72%)

O

Me

MeOH, refluxNH

O

NO2

H

Br

I

OTBS

K2CO3, LiI, MeCN

50 ˚C, (74%)

N

O

NO2

HI OTBS

Page 30: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Bonjoch and Bosch: D-Ring Formation via Heck Reaction

! Intramolecular Heck reaction provides desired tetracyclic product in moderate yield

N

O

NO2

HI OTBS

N

H

OTBS

O

NO230 mol% Pd(OAc)2

100 mol% PPh3

NEt3, 90 ˚C

(53%)

N

H

OtBu

O

NR2

Overman Intermediate

Same Sequence

as OvermanN

O O

N

H H

(!)-Strychnine

16 steps, 0.2% yield

Page 31: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

! Iminium reduction / basic epimerization correctly set final stereocenters

Many Routes Utilize the Same Endgame

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

NH

HO O

N

H H

N

O O

N

H H

NaOAc, CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, AcOH, 110 ˚C

Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

Strychnine

Common Intermediate

1. Zn, H2SO4, or NaBH(OAc)3

2. NaOMe or NaH, MeOH, rt

3. DIBAL, CH2Cl2 or toluene

! 9 Routes go through the Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

! 6 Use the same sequence to set sterochemistry:

*Calculated using Overman's yields.

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

Page 32: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Fukuyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 10246.

N

O O

N

H H

(!)-Strychnine

NH

CO2Me

N

H

OH

Common Intermediate

Fukuyama's Approach to (!)-Strychnine

NH

N

CO2Me

N

N

CO2Me

H

Ns

Boc

O

OHN

H

Boc

OH

TBSOOTBS

EE

Pictet-

Spengler

oxidative

cleavage

double

Mitsunobu

HCO2Me

NH

TBSO

O

OTBS

CO2Me

CO2Me

Tsuji-

Trost

! Double Mitsunobu reaction sets up key Diasteroselective Pictet-Spengler reaction

Page 33: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Fukuyama: Intramolecular Pictet-Spengler Sets Strychnine Core

N

N

CO2Me

H

Ns

Boc

O

! Key ring contraction forms CDE ring system as a single diastereomer

N

N

CO2Me

H

Ns

Boc

CHO

CO2Me

NH

N

CO2Me

H CO2MeNH

CO2Me

N

CO2MeH

PhSH, Cs2CO3, MeCN

TFA, Me2S, CH2Cl2

55% (4 steps)

-Ns

-Boc

-Ns:

-Boc:

N

OH

NH

H

E

H

all at 50 ˚C

NH

HOMOM

TBSOOTBS

EE

9 steps from benzoic acid (10%)

7 steps

47% yield

3 steps

(!)-Strychnine (25 steps, 2% yield)

Page 34: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Fukuyama: Intramolecular Pictet-Spengler Sets Strychnine Core

N

N

CO2Me

H

Ns

Boc

O

! Key ring contraction forms CDE ring system as a single diastereomer

N

N

CO2Me

H

Ns

Boc

CHO

CO2Me

NH

N

CO2Me

H CO2MeNH

CO2Me

N

CO2MeH

PhSH, Cs2CO3, MeCN

TFA, Me2S, CH2Cl2

55% (4 steps)

-Ns

-Boc

-Ns:

-Boc:

N

OH

NH

H

E

H

all at 50 ˚C

NH

HOMOM

TBSOOTBS

EE

9 steps from benzoic acid (10%)

7 steps

47% yield

3 steps

(!)-Strychnine (25 steps, 2% yield)

Page 35: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

Page 36: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

(!)-Strychnine

O

CO2Me

CO2MeO

CO2Me

CO2Me

H

30 steps

2% yield

Page 37: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

N

O O

N

H H

(!)-Strychnine

O

CO2Me

CO2MeO

CO2Me

CO2Me

H

30 steps

2% yield

Fukuyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 10246.

(!)-Strychnine

O

CO2Me

CO2MeO

CO2Me

CO2Me

H

30 steps

2% yield

Page 38: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Padwa's Retrosynthetic Analysis

NH

HO O

N

H H

Wieland-Gumlich Aldehyde

N

O

N

H H

OMOMDMB

N

O

N

HAc

OMe

N

Ac

N

O

O Me

enolate

vinylation

Tandem [4+2]

rearrangement

N

O

N

HDMB

I

OMOM

! Key Intramolecular Diels-Alder Fragmentation reaction rapidly sets the ABCE core

Padwa Org. Lett. 2007, 279.

Page 39: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Padwa: Efficient Route to Strychnine Core

N

O

N

HAc

OMe

N

Ac

N

O

O Me

3-steps from acid (55% yield)

cat. MgI2

PhMe, 150 ˚C

(95%)

N

Ac

O

N

O

Ar

HN

Ac

N

O

Ar

HOH

H

H+

! Cascade Diels-Alder-fragmentation-elimination reaction sets CE ring system

Page 40: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Padwa: Elaboration of Cascade Product

N

O

N

HAc

OMe

! 4-Step sequence to take down aminde, deprotect amine, set E-ring stereochemistry

NH

OH

N

H

Me1. NaBH4, MeOH, THF, 0˚C

2. NaOMe, MeOH, rt

3. LiAlH4, THF, reflux

4. NaBH(OAc)3, DCE, -20 ˚C

('65% yield of the major diastereomer')

NH

OH

N

H

Me

1. Pd(OH)2/C, H2 (70%)

2. RBr, K2CO3, DMF (80%)

3. ArCHO, NaBH(OAc)3 (86%)

4. TPAP, NMO (80%)

N

O

N

H

I OMOM

OMeMeO

! Deprotection/ N-alkylation sets the stage for D-ring formation via vinylation reaction

Page 41: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Padwa: The Finishing of Strychnine

! Palladium-catalyzed enolate vinylation reaction finishes skeleton

N

O

N

H

I

DMB

PhOK, Pd(PPh3)4

THF, reflux

(56%)

N

O

N

H H

OMOMDMB

P

O

Ph

Ph

MeO

LDA, THF, 0 ˚C

(72%)

N

N

H H

OMOMDMB

OMe

OMOM

3N HCl, 55 ˚C

(54%) NH

HO O

N

H H

(W-G-A)

N

O O

N

H H

(±)-Strychnine

16 steps

2.4% overall yield

NaOAc, CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, AcOH, 110 ˚C

(80%)

Page 42: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

Page 43: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Rawal's Retrosynthetic Analysis of Isostrychnine

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

OH

IsostrychnineStrychnine

N

O

N

H

Heck

I

OTBS

N-alkylation

N

N

H

N-acylation

CO2MeMeO2C

CO2Me

N

MeO2C CO2Me

N CO2Me

CO2Me

O

MeH

NH2

N CO2Me

! Rawal uses an exo-selective intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction to forge BCE portion early

IMDA

Rawal J. Org. Chem. 1994, 2685.

Page 44: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Rawal: Construction of Early Intermediates

NO2

CN

! 5-step, scaleable synthesis of pyrrolidine starting material

BrBr

Bu4NBr, NaOH

1.

2. DIBAL (-78 ˚C)

(96%)

NO2

H

O BnNH2, TMSCl

NaI (96%)

NO2

N

SiMe3

Bn

I-

NO2

N

I

Bn

SiMe3

NO2

N Bn

NO2

N CO2MeCl OMe HO2CNH2

Pd/C (86%)

NH2

N CO2MeO

79% yield, 25 g scale

Page 45: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Rawal: Quantitative Key Intramolecular Diels-Alder Cycloaddition

! Thermal acyl dienamine [4+2] forges BCE ring system, C-7 spirocenter simultaneously

NH2

N CO2MeO

Me

CO2Me

then ClCO2Me

N

N CO2Me

MeO2C CO2Me

PhMe

185!˚C, 4h

N

N

CO2MeMeO2C

Exo (favored) vs Endo

N

N

CO2Me

CO2MeCO2Me

CO2Me N

MeO2C

N

H

CO2Me

CO2Me

(85%)

(99%), single isomer

Page 46: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Rawal: Completion of the Natural Product via Heck Reaction

! One-pot deprotection/ acylation sequence forges G-ring, Heck reaction for D-ring

N

MeO2C

N

H

CO2Me

CO2Me

TMSI (10 equiv)

CHCl3 reflux N

NH

H

then MeOH, refluxO

(90%)

Br

I OTBS

K2CO3, Acetone

DMF

N

N

H

O

(83%)

I OTBS1. 30 mol% Pd(OAc)2

Bu4NCl, DMF, K2CO3

70 ˚C, 3h

N

O

N

H H

OH

2. HCl, THFIsostrychnine (71%)

13-steps, 10% overall yield

Page 47: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

Page 48: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

N

O

NHAc

CoCp

N

O

NHAc

A

A: CpCo(C2H2)2, C2H2, THF, 46% yield

N

O

NHAc

CoCp

N

O

NHAc

A

A: CpCo(C2H2)2, C2H2, THF, 46% yield

Volhardt Org. Lett. 2000, 2479.

Page 49: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

Mori Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 1934.

N

O

N

H H

OH

Pd-was here

Mori Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 1934.

N

O

N

H H

OH

Pd-was here

Page 50: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Comparing the Syntheses of Strychnine

! Wieland-Gumlich aldehyde routes (9)

1992: Magnus (similar): (±), 28 steps, 0.03% yield

1993: Overman: (!), 24 steps, 3% yield

1998: Kuehne: (!), 19 steps, 3% yield

2001: Martin: (±), 16 step formal, ca 1% yield*

2004: Fukuyama: (!), 25 steps, 2% yield

2000: Bonjoch/ Bosch: (!), 16 steps, 0.2% yield

N

O O

N

H HN

O

N

H H

NH

HO O

N

H H

OHStrychnine

H+ or OH-

base, RONO

Beckmann

(3:1) CH2(CO2H)2

Ac2O, NaOAc

1993: Stork: (±), 14 steps, yield unknown

2002: Shibasaki: (!), 31 steps, 2% yield

2007: Padwa: (±), 16 steps, 2% yield

! Isostrychnine routes (6)

1954: Woodward: (±), 28 steps, 6E-5% yield

1993: Kuehne: (±), 20 steps, 0.6% yield (2%)

1994: Rawal: (±), 14 steps, 3% yield (10%)

2000: Volhardt: (±), 15 steps, 0.3% yield (1%)

2002: Mori: (!), 23 steps, 0.1% yield (0.5%)

2002: Bodwell: (±), 12 step formal, ca 3% yield

Page 51: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Bodwell: Very Concise Formal Synthesis

! Very simple chemistry sets up the key step

Bodwell Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 3261.

NH

NH2 N N

II

sec-butanol, 100 ˚CNH

NH

N

N

I

N

NH

N

N

I

allyl bromide

KOH, DMF, rt

4d, quant. 2d, (91%)

NH

N

N

N

OMe

O

1. 9-BBN, THF, 0 ˚C

2. Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3

THF,reflux, 2d (65%)

NaHMDS, THF

then ClCO2Me

(96%)

Bodwell: Very Concise Formal Synthesis

! Very simple chemistry sets up the key step

Bodwell Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 3261.

NH

NH2 N N

II

sec-butanol, 100 ˚CNH

NH

N

N

I

N

NH

N

N

I

allyl bromide

KOH, DMF, rt

4d, quant. 2d, (91%)

NH

N

N

N

OMe

O

1. 9-BBN, THF, 0 ˚C

2. Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3

THF,reflux, 2d (65%)

NaHMDS, THF

then ClCO2Me

(96%)

Page 52: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Bodwell: Very Concise Formal Synthesis

! Very simple chemistry sets up the key step

Bodwell Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 3261.

NH

NH2 N N

II

sec-butanol, 100 ˚CNH

NH

N

N

I

N

NH

N

N

I

allyl bromide

KOH, DMF, rt

4d, quant. 2d, (91%)

NH

N

N

N

OMe

O

1. 9-BBN, THF, 0 ˚C

2. Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3

THF,reflux, 2d (65%)

NaHMDS, THF

then ClCO2Me

(96%)

Bodwell: Very Concise Formal Synthesis

! Quantitative key intramolecular inverse-demand Diels-Alder reaction

Bodwell Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 3261.

N

N

N

N

OMe

O

N

N

H

CO2Me

diethylaniline

217 ˚C, 1h

quant.N

N

H

CO2Me

NaBH4, TFA

PhH, 12 h

quant.

H

1. PDC, CH2Cl2, rt, 3 d (30%)

2. TMSI, CHCl3, 60 ˚C, (93%) N

NH

H

H

O

15.8% overall

8 steps

(±)-Strychnine ca 12 steps, 2.6% yield

Page 53: Comparative total syntheses of strychnine

Selected Total Syntheses of Strychnine

(±)-Isostrychnine

13-steps, 10% overall yield

(!)-Strychnine

27-steps, 3% overall yield

(!)-Strychnine

25-steps, 2% overall yield

(±)-Strychnine

16-steps, 2% overall yield

Overman (1993) Rawal (1994)

Fukuyama (2004) Padwa (2007)

(±)-Isostrychnine

13-steps, 10% overall yield

(!)-Strychnine

24-steps, 3% overall yield

(!)-Strychnine

19-steps, 3% overall yield

(±)-Strychnine

16-steps, 2% overall yield

Overman (1993) Rawal (1994) Kuehne (1998) Padwa (2007)