52
Affective Teaching Does emotion have a place in classroom learning?

Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Affective Teaching

Does emotion have a place in classroom

learning?

Page 2: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

1What this paper is all

about…

Page 3: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

The Story of the “Angry Principal/Teacher”

• A very common experience

Page 4: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

What is worse than an “angry teacher”?

• The Emotionless Teacher (The Putin Method)

Page 5: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

What does educational thinkers say?

• The key to successful teaching is to become a caring teacher

• (e.g., Berliner, 1995; Bracey, 1991; Brookover, 1981; Brown, 1971; Deutsch, 1949; Flanders, 1970; Glasser, 1969; Glidewell, 1976; Hentoff, 1966; Johnson & Johnson, 1991; Kohl, 1969; Kozol, 1967; Krishnan, 2006; Lightfoot, 1983; Lippitt & Gold, 1959; McMillan, 1980; Nyquist & Hawes, 1972; Purkey, 1983; Rogers, 1969; Schmuck & Schmuk, 1974, 1976; Silverstein, 1994; Thelen, 1960, Withall, 1949a, 1949b, 1977).

Page 6: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

In other words…

to be somewhat Mother Theresa-like in the

classroom

Page 7: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

What does some teachers say?

Hi Roy,My sister and I were discussing whether

teachers being “caring” is essential to learning. For instance, should teachers be personable to their students? She did not feel that it was necessity for a teacher to indicate care for his/her students, so long as the teacher provided the knowledge needed, and the inspiration to keep learning.

:-) janelle (not her real name)

Page 8: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

What does some teachers say?

• “If a teacher shows too much care towards students…students will take advantage of the teacher.”

---A lecturer

• “A caring teacher will ultimately see the sole of their students shoes.”

---A high school teacher

Page 9: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

What does some teachers say?

• “The best thing is to keep a straight face. Don’t show any emotion. It will make you vulnerable. It will make you lose control over your classroom.

---A Middle School Teacher

Page 10: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

In other words…

to be somewhat Putin-like in the classroom

Page 11: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

So…what is the Big Question here?

Should I become a

caring teacher or

not?

Page 12: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Or in other words…

Should a teacher be Putin-like OR Mother Theresa-

like?

Page 13: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

2Methodology &

Procedures

Page 14: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Primary Data• Reflective-Participant-Observation

reports compiled by the researcher.• Consisted of anecdotal records of the

experiences of both the teacher/researcher and the students in a period of 2 years.

Page 15: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Participants• Sophomore, junior and senior

students in the Education/Psychology Department at Mission College.

• Students came from a variety of backgrounds and represented different nationalities.

• Students differ in general English proficiency and overall academic achievement

Page 16: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Design

teacher students

Programs, treatment & intervention based on Affective teaching principles

Page 17: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Data Collection• Students’ academic achievement

and feedback are recorded• Feedback obtained are in verbal and

non verbal form. This include blog comments at researcher’s website.

• Level and frequency of participation, performance in exams are noted.

Page 18: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Data AnalysisThe researcher engaged in content

analysis by looking at emerging themes and patterns from narrative field notes that were collected and collated during the two years time period. These themes and patterns were then coded and categorized to be presented as findings of the study.

Page 19: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

3Results & Findings

Page 20: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

2 Major Findings• The study enumerate the 14 most

effective ways to implement Affective Teaching.

• The study enumerate the experiences of students across areas of functioning in the classroom.

Page 21: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 1: 14 Most Effective Ways to Implement Affective Teaching

1. Encourage 2 ways communication2. Empower students for self-

leadership3. Implement cooperative learning

strategies

Page 22: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 1: 14 Most Effective Ways to Implement Affective Teaching

4. Use Engaging Teaching Methods.5. Build mastery.

Page 23: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 1: 14 Most Effective Ways to Implement Affective Teaching

6. Use performance based tools to grade students.

7. Create anxiety free conversations.

Page 24: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 1: 14 Most Effective Ways to Implement Affective Teaching

8. Be passionate and enthusiastic.9. Communicate high and realistic

expectations.10. Build friendship.

Page 25: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 1: 14 Most Effective Ways to Implement Affective Teaching

11. Use a blend of democratic-permissive discipline approach.

12. Don’t force learning.

Page 26: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 1: 14 Most Effective Ways to Implement Affective Teaching

13. Admit mistakes and amend things when you know you are wrong.

14. Use and encourage Creativity.

Page 27: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 2: Enumeration of Students Experience &

Performance1. Students are more cohesive in the

classroom.2. They experience personal and

collective satisfaction.3. They developed a sense of direction

to fulfill academic and non academic goals.

Page 28: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 2: Enumeration of Students Experience &

Performance4. Frictions were reduced.5. Students progressed academically.6. Students developed a sense of

control.7. Learning became exciting,

interesting & progressive.

Page 29: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 2: Enumeration of Students Experience &

Performance8. Critical and creative thinking skills

were developed and enhanced.9. Confidence was built.10. A trusting relationship between

students and teacher developed.

Page 30: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 2: Enumeration of Students Experience &

Performance11. Students became responsible for

their own learning.12. Boredom was removed. Motivation

for learning increased.13. Students became more inspired

and focused about their future.

Page 31: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Finding 2: Enumeration of Students Experience &

Performance14. Students actively participated in

class. 15. Students imitate the affective

teaching practice of the teacher.16. Students change their attitude

towards teaching and learning.

Page 32: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

In the light of these findings…

Page 33: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Let’s go back to our original question

Should a teacher be Putin-like OR Mother Theresa-

like?

Page 34: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

The answer is…

Page 35: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

x

Page 36: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

4Discussion

Page 37: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

1. Affective Teaching is a practical working model.

Affective teaching helps create caring classrooms that facilitates the development of self-esteem and satisfaction of fundamental motives.

(Fraser & Fisher, 1982; Walberg, 1979)

Page 38: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

2. Mastery and Interpersonal Power leads to Positive

Feelings and involvement in schools.

(Argyris, 1976; Benham, 1980; Bowman, et al., 1999; Brookhart, 1997; Brookhart & DeVoge, 1999; Calonico & Calonico, 1972; Chen, et al., 1999; Dorman, 1996; Duck, 1986; Fyans; 1980; Howes, 2000; Pulvers & Diekhoff, 1999; Schmuck & Schmuck, 1992).

Page 39: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

3. Affective Teaching entails 2 education practice

• Teachers must care enough to ensure maximum learning in students.

• Teachers must have the right orientation towards learning and teaching. He must be Learning centered as opposed to other centers.

Page 40: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

4. Affective Teaching calls for brain research based practice

• To be learning centered, a teacher must take account of the way the brain works and learns.

Page 41: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

5Recommendatio

ns

Page 42: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

1. Change Attitude

(Di Martino & Zan, 2003; Hannel, 2005; Kouladis, 1987;

McDermott, 1991; Moreira, 1993; Nemser-Feinman &

Floden, 1986).

Page 43: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

2. Find Good Role Models

Tiberghien (1993)

Page 44: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

3. Expose teachers to relevant media

Literature, films & lectures

Page 45: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

4. Join or Create a support group

Page 46: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

The Story of the Caring Principal/Teacher

• Dr. Art Ong-Jumsai • Chief Administrator of the Satya Sai School, Lopburi, Thailand

Page 47: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

6Last

words…

Page 48: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

I have started a website to create awareness on the need for Affective

Teaching

Page 49: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

A place where teachers can learn from each other

Page 50: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Join the discussion at my

blog…

www.affectiveteaching.com

Page 51: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

Books on Affective Teaching are available at our booth

Page 52: Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method

AcknowledgmentMany thanks to the students in the

Psychology/Education Department at Mission College (2003 – 2005 batches) for cooperating to make this research a success. Your patience, dedication, and

willingness to learn and grow have given birth to ideas that would change and revolutionize the face of education

in this part of the world.