Upload
frost-sullivan
View
2.121
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This briefing will discuss financial benchmarking in the investment banking industry and provide an outlook for 2014. - Understand financial performances of investment banks in different regions of the globe - Discover financial performance by revenue range/size of the banks - Explore opportunities and identify banks that are excelling in a challenging environment - Identify top performers and opportunities for investment - Gain an outlook for 2014 Listen On Demand: https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/5562/93385
Citation preview
Financial Assessment of Global Investment Financial Assessment of Global Investment Banking IndustryBanking Industry
Conservatism, stability and lower returns Conservatism, stability and lower returns –– the new norm for the industry?the new norm for the industry?
NC95-F1December 5, 2013
Contents
S No Section
1. Introduction
2. Key Market Statistics of the Global Investment Banking Industry
3. Ratio Analysis by Geography
4. Ratio Analysis by Revenue Range
NC95-F1 2
4. Ratio Analysis by Revenue Range
5. Top Performers in the Global Investment Banking Industry
6. Outlook and Conclusion
7. The Frost & Sullivan Story
Objectives of the Study
Key study objectives include:
To analyse companies in the Investment Banking industry based on key financial metrics
To identify key performance drivers and restraints
NC95-F1 3
To identify the best performers in the industry
To identify, compare and assess regions/countries that are current and potential hubs of investment banking activity
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Scope of the Study (Continued)
38
2025303540
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Middle East and Africa –55 companies
19
8 9
6
1
0
5
10
15
20
Above 2 billion
500 million - 2
billion
200 - 500 million
50 - 200 million
Below 50 million
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Average Revenue Range (2007 – 2012)
38
16
3
14
6
05
10152025303540
Above 2 billion
500 million - 2
billion
200 - 500 million
50 - 200 million
Below 50 million
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Average Revenue Range (2007 – 2012)
4439
25
40
53
30
40
50
60
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Europe – 77 companies
Asia Pacific – 201 companies
North America – 43 companies
NC95-F1 4
10
2 2 3
05
101520
Above 2 billion
500 million - 2
billion
200 - 500 million
50 - 200 million
Below 50 million
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Average Revenue Range (2007 – 2012)
55 companies
7
15
01
2
02468
10121416
Above 2 billion
500 million - 2
billion
200 - 500 million
50 - 200 million
Below 50 million
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Average Revenue Range (2007 – 2012)
Latin America and Caribbean – 25 companies0
10
20
30
Above 2 billion
500 million - 2
billion
200 - 500 million
50 - 200 million
Below 50 million
No
. o
f co
mp
an
ies
Average Revenue Range (2007 – 2012)
Total of 401 companies analyzed aftershortlisting from 2500 Investment banks.Study period – FY 2007 to H1 2013
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Estim
ate
s
0.00
250.00
500.00
750.00
1,000.00
1,250.00
1,500.00
1,750.00
2,000.00
2,250.00
Rev
en
ue in
US
D b
illio
n
H2 - 1034.92
H1 – 1033.55
Investment Banking Industry: Market Size (in USD Billion) , Global, 2007 – 2014E
2068.471996.861893.64
1823.18
1612.481445.74
1700.03
Estim
ate
s
2116.66
Global Market Size
Expected growth Estimate – 2.3%
NC95-F1 5
0.002007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year
Africa and the Middle East Latin America and the Caribbean Asia Pacific Europe North America
Source: Capital IQ, Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Region CAGR
Global 3.3%
North America 5.9%
Europe -3.4%
Asia Pacific 10.3%
Africa and the Middle East -1.3%
Latin America and the Caribbean 4.4%
Market Growth (2007 – 2012)
Region 2007 2012 2013 2014E
North America 25.7 29.2 29.8 30.0
Europe 40.3 28.9 28.9 28.7
Asia Pacific 22.6 31.4 32.0 31.8
Latin America and the Caribbean 5.8 6.1 4.8 4.9
Africa and the Middle East 5.6 4.5 4.5 4.6
Market Share by Region
Dri
vers
1–2 Years 2–5 Years 5–7 Years
Focus on core strengths
Investment Banking Industry: Key Market Drivers, Global, 2014–2020
Sustainable business model
Conservatism in risk management procedures
Market Drivers
Drivers
NC95-F1 6
Mark
et
Dri
vers
Increased integration
Focus on core strengths
Finding new pockets of growth
Increased customer focus
Impact: High Medium Low Tenure: 1-2 Years: Short Term, 2-5 Years: Medium Term, 5-7 Years: Long Term
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Restr
ain
ts
1–2 Years 2–5 Years 5–7 Years
Mandatory higher capital base
Investment Banking Industry: Key Market Restraints, Global, 2014–2020
Deteriorating performance
Stagnant or flat line growth
Market Restraints
Restraints
NC95-F1 7
Mark
et
Restr
ain
ts
Investor confidence and brand image of investment
banks
Mandatory higher capital base
Regulations from multiple authorities
New technology
Impact: High Medium Low Tenure: 1-2 Years: Short Term, 2-5 Years: Medium Term, 5-7 Years: Long Term
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Driv
ers
Driv
ers
Scope for inorganic growth through
business integration and consolidation to result in increased
synergies
Deleveraging and increase in capital base to make the
industry more stable
Declining costs due to increase in operating
efficiency by downsizing or improvement in process
3
2
The drivers and restraints are those that impact financial management and risk management objective in the investment banking industry. Drivers are those that would lead the industry to better financial and risk management or be a value driver. Restraints are those that would negatively impact the financial management or be a cost driver.
Market Financial Attractiveness
NC95-F1 8
Re
stra
ints
Re
stra
ints
Increasing regulatory compliance costs
Declining Return on Equity
1
3
1
2
Low industry growth
The size of the arrow denotes the impact of the parameter on a scale of 1 to 3.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Ratio Analysis by Geography
Investment Banking Industry: Relative Financial Assessment by Geography, Global, FY2012
40
60
80
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t
North America
Africa and the Middle East
Latin America and the Caribbean
No growth but sustained profits
High growth with increasing competition
High returns
Low returns
Medium returns
Returns to investor
Greater Profitability with
NC95-F1 9
-20
0
20
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t
Financial Management
Asia Pacific
EuropeNegative profits with no growth
Increasing profits at the cost of high risk
Profitability with less risk
The graph is indicative of relative risk and profitability across different regions. The size of the bubble is indicative of size of the market as a percentage of the global market size.
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Snapshot – Ratio Analysis by Revenue Range
Revenue Range Profitability Ratios Cost Ratios Debt RatiosCapital Ratios
Leverage Ratio
Liquidity Ratio
Above $2.00 billion
Declining ROE,Increasing net margin
Decreasing cost margins
High debt ratios
Low capital ratio (Basel III requirement)
Very high Low liquidity
$500.0 million -Declining but high ROE relative to the industry, Decreasing cost Medium debt
Adequate capital ratio to suffice Basel
Adequate Low liquidity
Investment Banking Industry: Trend Analysis of Ratios by Revenue Range, Global, 2007 – H1 2013
NC95-F1 10
$500.0 million -$2.00 billion
relative to the industry, Return on Assets close to 1.0 percent.
Decreasing cost margins
Medium debt ratios
suffice Basel III requirements
Adequate leverage
Low liquidity
200.0 million –500.0 million
ROE declining at a higher pace, declining net margins
High cost margins
Low debt ratios
High capital ratio
Low leverage
High liquidity
$50.0 million -$200.0 million
High return on assets, declining ROE
High cost margins
Low debt ratios
High capital ratio
Low leverage
High liquidity
Below $50.0 million
High return on assets, declining ROE
High cost margins
Low debt ratios
High capital ratio
Low leverage
High liquidity
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Investment Banking Industry: Top 100 Investment Banks (Financial vs Risk Management), Global, FY2012
Global Top Performers - Financial Management versus Risk Management
380
480
580
Sco
re
Top performers are those that areable to strike a balance betweenprofitability and risk management.Quadrant 1 – High Profit, Low RiskQuadrant 2 – High Profit , High RiskQuadrant 3 – Low Profit , High RiskQuadrant 4 – Low Profit, Low Risk
14
Top 25
NC95-F1 11
-20
80
180
280
- 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t S
co
re
Financial Management Score
High profitability compensates for risk management
14
23
Bottom 25
Note: Please refer Glossary for complete list of names for the tickers used. Analysis based on FY 2012 financials. Source: Capital IQ, Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Global Top Performers - Financial Management versus Risk Management
Legend key
NC95-F1 12
Legend key
Investment Banking Industry: Financial Vs Risk Management, North America, FY2012
Regional Top Performers - Financial Management versus Risk Management
OTCPK:SFNS
NasdaqGS:FBRC
NYSE:RCAP
NasdaqGS:LPLAOTCPK:ZGCO
NYSE:JMP
NYSE:GHL
NYSE:EVR
NYSE:PJC
NasdaqGS:BGCPAMEX:ICH
380
480
580
Sco
re
Top performers are those that areable to strike a balance betweenprofitability and risk management.Quadrant 1 – Profit with Low RiskQuadrant 2 – Profit with High RiskQuadrant 3 – No Profit with High RiskQuadrant 4 – No Profit with Low Risk
14
10 out of 43 banks analyzed recorded losses in 2012. Most have a high risk profile.
Among Top 20 performers in North America with medium to low risk
NC95-F1 13
NYSE:JPM
NYSE:WFC
NasdaqGS:INTL
NYSE:BAC
NYSE:RJF
NYSE:AMTD
NYSE:GHL
NYSE:GS
NYSE:C
TSX:GMP
NYSE:FXCM
NYSE:KCG
TSX:RY
NYSE:USB
NYSE:SF
NYSE:MS
TSX:BNS
TSX:TDTSX:BMO
TSX:NA
NYSE:SCHW
NYSE:CMA
AMEX:ICH
NYSE:GFIG
NasdaqGS:GLCH
AMEX:LTS
NYSE:OPYNYSE:ITG
TSX:CFNYSE:SWS
OTCPK:GTAX
NasdaqGS:ETFC
-20
80
180
280
(800.00) (600.00) (400.00) (200.00) - 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1,000.00
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t S
co
re
Financial Management Score
14
23
Note: Please refer Glossary for complete list of names for the tickers used. Analysis based on FY 2012 financials. Source: Capital IQ, Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Most risky banks
Most profitable banks / top performers despite high risk
High risk, no profits
NasdaqGS:LPLA
BVC:SOCBOLIVAR
SHSE:600030
TSE:8591
KOSE:A006800
NYSE:RJF
KOSE:A003540
240
280
320
360
400
440
Sco
re
Top performers are those that are ableto strike a balance between profitabilityand risk management.Quadrant 1 – High Profit with Low RiskQuadrant 2 – High Profit with High RiskQuadrant 3 – Low Profit with High RiskQuadrant 4 – Low Profit with Low Risk
Good Risk managers
Investment Banking Industry: Financial Vs Risk Management, Banks in Revenue Range of Above $2.00 billion (Top 50), FY2012
Top Performers by Revenue Range - Financial Management versus Risk Management
14
75 percent of North America banks (14 banks out of 19 in theanalysis) are in the top 50 list in this category in comparison toonly 10 percent (4 out of 38) in Europe.
Majority of the investment bankswith revenues above $2.00 billionfeature in Quadrant 3 which ischaracteristic of high risk due tohigher leverage, high debt capitaland low capital ratio.Top most performers are banks inQuadrant 2 and 4.
NC95-F1 14
NYSE:JPMNYSE:WFC
SEHK:939
NasdaqGS:INTL
SEHK:3988
NYSE:BAC
MICEX:SBER
NYSE:AMTD
BOVESPA:ITSA4
NYSE:GS
NYSE:C
LSE:HSBA
JKSE:BBRI
SASE:1120
TSEC:2881
ENXTPA:BNP
BVC:GRUPOAVAL
BOVESPA:BBDC4
JKSE:BBCA
JKSE:BMRI
SEHK:3328
TSX:RY
IBSE:HALKB
SHSE:600036
SHSE:600016
NYSE:USB
SGX:O39
JSE:FSR
IBSE:GARAN
SHSE:601166
ASX:CBA
IBSE:AKBNK SET:SCB
WSE:PKOSET:KBANK
-40
0
40
80
120
160
200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Ris
k M
an
ag
em
en
t S
co
re
Financial Management Score
23
Note: Please refer Glossary for complete list of names for the tickers used. Analysis based on FY 2012 financials. Source: Capital IQ, Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Most profitable banks despite high risk
Outlook
Increase capital base Increasing costs Cost cutting measures
Ind
ustry
Ou
tloo
kIn
du
str
y O
utl
oo
k
NC95-F1 15
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Adapting to technologyRestructuring business
modelsOperating efficiency
Re-pricing mechanisms De risking balance sheets Rebuilding brand image
Ind
ustry
Ou
tloo
kIn
du
str
y O
utl
oo
k
Conclusion
Investment banking revenue growth is expected to remain stagnant over the next year 2014.
Size is no longer an advantage in the investment banking industry
Investment banks would develop strategies to maintain performance levels and capture greater marketshare in a flat line growth industry.
1
2
3
Five Big Conclusions
NC95-F1 16
share in a flat line growth industry.
Asian and American investment banks
Moving towards risk – return tradeoff
3
4
5
Source: Frost & Sullivan analysis.
Next Steps
Develop Your Visionary and Innovative SkillsGrowth Partnership Service Share your growth thought leadership and ideas or
join our GIL Global Community
NC95-F1 17
Join our GIL Community NewsletterKeep abreast of innovative growth opportunities
Phone: 1-877-GOFROST (463-7678) Email: [email protected]
Your Feedback is Important to Us
Growth Forecasts?
Competitive Structure?
What would you like to see from Frost & Sullivan?
NC95-F1 18
Emerging Trends?
Strategic Recommendations?
Other?
Please inform us by “Rating” this presentation.
Follow Frost & Sullivan on Facebook, LinkedIn, SlideShare, and Twitter
http://www.facebook.com/FrostandSullivan
http://www.linkedin.com/companies/4506
NC95-F1 19
http://twitter.com/frost_sullivan
http://www.linkedin.com/companies/4506
http://www.slideshare.net/FrostandSullivan
For Additional Information
Jeannette Garcia
Corporate Communications
Business Financial Services
+1-210-477-8427
Sheetal Kothari
Research Analyst
Business Financial Services
+91-44-6160 6666 Ext. 4045
NC95-F1 20
Shrikanth S
Industry Manager
Business Financial Services
+91-44-66814043
Lori Salazar- Strubhart
Sales Director- North America
Business Financial Services
+1- 210.247.2448