14
The BadgerCare Plus Evaluation Team Prepared for AcademyHealth, 6/2011

Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

The BadgerCare Plus Evaluation TeamPrepared for AcademyHealth, 6/2011

Page 2: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11
Page 3: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Am I Eligible?Anyone can submit minimal information on their household and receive feedback on whether they might be eligible for health care, nutrition or child care supplements, prescription drug assistance, energy assistance or tax credits.

Apply for Benefits Submit application for BadgerCare Plus, Medicaid, FoodShare, child care and/or the Family Planning Waiver online. However, other steps must be taken for the process to be completed.

Page 4: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11
Page 5: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

ACCESS

Mail-in

Walk-in

Phone

Page 6: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

What % of applications are received through ACCESS? Are there differences in the socio-economic status of those that

use ACCESS versus other methods of application?

Target Efficiency of ACCESS: Is ACCESS more or less likely than other methods to attract applicants who are ultimately determined to be eligible for public insurance?

Application and Eligibility Spillover: Does ACCESS promote greater likelihood of applying to other social programs? What are the rates of eligibility determination among “spillover” applications generated by ACCESS relative to other methods?

Page 7: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

State contractor Deloitte selected a sample of those who applied for Health Insurance from January 2008 to October 2010 through all methods.

UW-PHI limited the sample to BC+ Child and Caretaker applications through November 2009 so we could match to the CARES demographic data we had at the time. CARES is the state’s eligibility system for BadgerCare Plus.

We selected the oldest person listed in the case for individual demographic categories, typically a parent.

Page 8: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Percent of Applications by Method

ACCESSWalk-inMail-inPhone

62%18%

17%

4%

Page 9: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Percent Determined Eligible for BC+ by Method

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Phone Walk-in Mail-in ACCESS

Application method

% d

eter

min

ed e

ligib

le fo

r BC+

87% 83%

77%

69%

Page 10: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

SES by MethodApplication Method by Income

56%

85%

22%5%

18%8%4% 2%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

< 150% FPL >= 150% FPL

ACCESS

Walk-in

Mail-in

Phone

Note: similar pattern emerges when the sample is stratified by other potential markers of vulnerability (primary language, citizenship status, rural status, gender)

Page 11: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Application Spillover by Method

38%

51%

41%

4%

63%

46%

6%

72%

53%

16%

72%

60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

ACCESS Walk-in Mail-in Phone

Jan08-Jun08

Jul08-Dec08

Jan09-Nov09

Application spillover = % of BC+ applicants also applying for FoodShare

Page 12: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Eligible Spillover by Method

42%50%

75%

63%72%

82%72%

72%78%

60%

74%

52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

ACCESS Walk-in Mail-in Phone

Jan08-Jun08

Jul08-Dec08

Jan09-Nov09

Eligible spillover = % of BC+ applicants applying for FoodShare (FS) who are determined eligible for FS

Page 13: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Wisconsin awarded federal Early Innovator grant to be used to expand ACCESS platform for planned private health insurance exchanges

Governor’s proposed biennial budget eliminates county-based walk-in services, instead relying almost exclusively on ACCESS Has generated considerable concern among advocate groups

Currently, ACCESS requires all submitted applications to be reviewed by a caseworker to verify and review information submitted. Cost/benefit analysis?

Page 14: Arm2011 oliver(leininger) 6.14.11

Data, graphs, and some written sections taken from two issue briefs: “The Target Efficiency of Online Medicaid/CHIP Enrollment: An Evaluation of Wisconsin’s ACCESS Internet Portal”- Leininger, Friedsam, Voskuil, DeLeire. Published by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation & “Online Application for Medicaid and BadgerCare: How Efficient Relative to Other Application Venues?”

Thanks to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services for the support.