1
LIFEFORTHEFAMILIESOFTHEVICTORIANCRIMINALLYINSANE*
JADESHEPHERD
UniversityofLincoln
Runninghead:FAMILIESOFTHEVICTORIANINSANE
Abstract.Thisarticleuseshundredsofletterswrittenbythefamiliesofpatients
committedintoVictorianBroadmoorCriminalLunaticAsylumtoprovidethefirst
sustainedexaminationoftheeffectsofasylumcommittalonpatientsâindividual
familymembers.Itshowsthatdespitewhathistorianshavepreviouslysuggested
theeffectonfamilieswasnotsolely,orevennecessarilyprimarily,economic;ithad
significantemotionaleffects,andaffectedfamilymembersâsenseofselfand
relationshipsoutsidetheasylum.Italsoshowsthatfamilytiesandaffective
relationshipsmatteredagreatdealtoworking-classVictorians.Somefoundnew
waystogivemeaningtotheirrelationshipwith,andthelifeof,theirincarcerated
relative,despitethecoststhisentailed.Bytakinganewapproachâengagingwith
thehistoryofthefamily,shiftingfocusfrompatientstotheirindividualfamily
members,andconsideringfactorsincludingage,class,gender,changeovertime
andlifestageâthisarticledemonstratesthebreadthanddepthoftheeffectsof
asylumcommittal,andindoingsoprovidesnewandsignificantinsightsintothe
historyoftheVictorianasylum.Italsoenrichesthehistoryofthefamilyby
providinganinsightintoworking-classquotidianlives,bonds,andemotions.
SchoolofHistoryandHeritage,UniversityofLincoln,Lincoln,[email protected]*IwouldliketothankJoelMorleyforreadingmultipledraftsofthisarticle,thethreeanonymousreviewersfortheirverykindandgenerousfeedback,andEmmaGriffinforherswiftandhelpfulcommunicationfollowingtheacceptanceofthisarticle.
2
I.
Intheearly1890sMrsCooper,seeminglyfraughtandworn-down,repliedtoa
letterfromherhusbandwhohadbeenincarceratedinBroadmoor,Englandand
Walesâfirstcriminallunaticasylum,fortwenty-fiveyears:
IwassurprisedthatyouwillcontinuewritingasIwishyouwouldnotas
itupsetsmeverymuchandIhopeyouwonâtdosoanymoreâŠItrustyou
willneverwritetomeagainnoranyoneelseasitmakesmeillfromall
thesorrowIhavegonethrough.
AndaskGodtoforgiveyouasIhavehadastrugglingtimeofittheselast
25yearsithasbroughtmedowntoapooroldwomanandyourchildren
havequiteforgotyouandneverthinkanythingofyouandnoonenever
mentionsyourname.
Andasforthechildrentheyareallscatteredaboutthecountrytryingto
getanhonestlivingandhavenothingtoshareandIhavenothing.
Shedeclaredshewasleavingherhomeandâtherewillbenoonetotakeany
morelettersinsoitsnousewriting.â1Onlyfragmentsofthisletterremain;how
sheaddressedherhusbandorendedtheletterisunknown.Nevertheless,whatis
thereisvisceral,reflectingyearsofdistressandhardship.Otherdocumentsin
1BerkshireRecordOffice(BRO),D/H14/D2/2/1/373/6.AllreferencesbeginningD/H14arefromtheBRO;allaretolettersunlessstatedotherwise,withsender/recipientomittedifevidentinthetext.
3
Cooperâscasefilesuggesthisfamilyseveredtieswithhim.Yearslater,when
Cooperwasgravelyill,Broadmoorâsstaffwroteanotetoinformhislovedones.
Theyfailedtolocatethemandânofriendsâwasscribbledonthenote.Suchcases
highlightthelong-termpainandhardshipsomefamiliesexperienceddueto
havingabreadwinner,fatherandhusbandcommittedintoBroadmoor.Such
lettersallowhistorianstoviewasylumsfromthebottom-up,providingaglimpse
atâthehumanandemotionalsideofpatientandfamilylives,anaspectthatis
oftenmissingfromofficialbureaucraticsources.â2Theserare,valuablesources
enablenewandsignificantinsightsintotheVictorianasylum.
The1845AsylumsActrequiredeachcountyinEnglandandWalesto
haveanasylumforitspauperinsane.Scholarsandhistoriansofpsychiatryhave
debatedtheroleandsignificanceoftheVictorianasylum.Muchattentionhas
beenpaidtowhyasylumsemerged,whypatientswereadmittedandhowthey
weretreated,whypatientsweredischarged,andtheexperiencesofthosewho
workedandlivedinsidethem.3Overthelastthirtyyearshistorianshave
respondedtoRoyPorterâscalltowritemedicalhistoryâfrombelowâ,withafocus
onpatients.Doingsohashelpedtodevelopourunderstandingoftheroleand
2LouiseWannell,âPatientsârelativesandpsychiatricdoctors:letterwritingintheYorkRetreat,1875â1910â,SocialHistoryofMedicine,20(2007),pp.297â313atp.299.3JonathanAndrewsandAnneDigby,eds.,Sexandseclusion,classandcustody:perspectivesongenderandclassinthehistoryofBritishandIrishpsychiatry(NewYork,2004);JosephMelling,BillForsytheandRichardAdair,âFamilies,communitiesandthelegalregulationoflunacyinVictorianEngland:assessmentsofcrime,violenceandwelfareinadmissionstotheDevonAsylum,1845â1914â,inPeterBartlettandDavidWright,eds.,Outsidethewallsoftheasylum:thehistoryofcareinthecommunity1750â2000(LondonandNewBrunswick,1999),pp.153â80;AnneDigby,Madness,moralityandmedicine:astudyoftheYorkRetreat1796â1914(CambridgeandNewYork,1985);MichelFoucault,Historyofmadness,trans.byJohnMurphyandJeanKhalfa(LondonandNewYork,2006);LouiseHide,GenderandclassinEnglishasylums,1890â1914(Basingstoke,2014);AndrewScull,Themostsolitaryofafflictions:madnessandsocietyinBritain,1700â1900(NewHavenandLondon,1993);JosephMellingandBillForsythe,Thepoliticsofmadness:thestate,insanityandsocietyinEngland,1846â1914(LondonandNewYork,2006).
4
reachoftheasylum.4Giventhatmanyfamilieswereinvolvedinthecommittalof
insanerelativesintoasylums,itstandstoreasonthatmostpatientshadatleast
onefamilymemberaffectedbytheircommittal.Thereareswathesofthe
populationâthespouses,children,parentsandsiblingsoftheinsane,aswellas
theirfriendsandneighboursâwhoseliveswereaffectedbytheexistenceof
theseinstitutions.YetweknowlittleabouthowpatientsâfamiliesinEnglandand
Waleswereaffectedby,respondedto,andovercamearelativeâsasylum
committal.Workthusremainstobedoneifwearetounderstandthefullimpact
andreachoftheasylum.
Whileexcellentstudiesdoexist,whatweknowaboutpatientsâfamilies
representsthetipoftheiceberg.Weknowthatfamilieswrotetoasylumsto
requestinformationorexpressconcernabouttheirrelativeâswellbeing,toask
aboutanasylumâsprocedures,ortoobtaintheirrelativeâsdischarge.5Yet
historiansâconsiderationsofthesepointsrarelyincludethebroadersocialand
familialcontextofsuchrequestsandconcerns.Historianshaveacknowledged
thatasylumrecordsareusefulforexploringfamilylife,buttheirfocustends
towardsthe(domestic)reasonsindividualsdevelopedinsanity;howfamilies
copedwithcaringforaninsanerelativeathome;familiesârolesinadmissionand
discharge;andfamiliesârelationshipswithasylumdoctors,andtheirrolein
4RoyPorter,âThepatientâsview:doingmedicalhistoryfrombelowâ,TheoryandSociety,14(1985),pp.175â98;AllanBeveridge,'Lifeintheasylum:patients'lettersfromMorningside,1873-1908',HistoryofPsychiatry,9(1998),pp.431-69;AlexandraBacopoulos-ViauandAudeFauvel,âThepatientâsturn.RoyPorterandpsychiatryâstales,thirtyyearsonâ,MedicalHistory,60(2016),pp.1â18;LeonardD.SmithââYourverythankfulinmateâ:discoveringthepatientsofanearlycountylunaticasylumâ,SocialHistoryofMedicine,21(2008),pp.237â52.5CharlotteMackenzie,Psychiatryfortherich:ahistoryofTicehurstPrivateAsylum,1792â1917(LondonandNewYork,1992);AnnaShepherd,Institutionalizingtheinsaneinnineteenth-centuryEngland(Oxon,2014),pp.72-87.
5
shapingmedicalcare.6Whentheimpactonfamiliesisexplicitlyconsideredthe
focustendstowardsthematerialeffectuponthehousehold.7Butfocusingon
economicsdoesnotgofarenough.ItpaintsVictorianfamiliesasprimarily
pragmaticunitsofdomesticeconomicsratherthantheliving,feelingpeoplethat
historiansofthefamilyhaveuncovered.8Moreover,approacheswhichconsider
thehouseholdratherthanitsconstituentsoverlookthefactthateffectswerenot
containedwithinsinglehouseholdsand,moreimportantly,thatdifferentfamily
memberswereaffecteddifferentlyandfounddifferentwaystoovercomethe
lossofarelativetotheasylum.Overlookingthesethingsunderplaysthe
significanceandimpactoftheVictorianasylum,andmisrepresentstheVictorian
working-classfamiliestryingtonavigatelifewithoutaspouse,parent,childor
sibling.9RecentworkonIrishasylumsundertakenbyCatherineCoxandAlice
Maugerprovidessomeevidenceofaffectivefamilialbonds,10andscholars
6CaraDobbing,âThefamilyandinsanity:theexperienceoftheGarlandsAsylum,1862-1910âinCarolBeardmore,CaraDobbingandStevenKing,eds.,FamilylifeinBritain1650-1910(2019,Cham,Switzerland),pp.135-54;MarkFinnane,âAsylums,familiesandthestateâ,HistoryWorkshopJournal,20(1985),pp.134â48;MarjorieLevine-Clark,âDysfunctionaldomesticity:femaleinsanityandfamilyrelationshipsamongtheWestRidingpoorinthemid-nineteenthcenturyâ,JournalofFamilyHistory,25(2000),pp.341â61;Smith,âThankfulâ;Wannell,âPatientsâ;JohnWalton,âCastingoutandbringingbackinVictorianEngland:pauperlunatics,1840-1870â,inWilliamF.Bynum,RoyPorterandMichaelShepherd,eds.,Theanatomyofmadness:essaysinthehistoryofpsychiatry(3vols.,London,1985-88),VII(1985),pp.132-46;DavidWright,âThedischargeofpauperlunaticsfromcountyasylumsinmid-VictorianEngland:thecaseofBuckinghamshire,1853-1872â,inJosephMellingandBillForsythe,eds.,Insanity,institutionsandsociety,1800-1914:asocialhistoryofmadnessincomparativeperspective(LondonandNewYork,1999),pp.93-113atp.94;Idem.âGettingoutoftheasylum:understandingtheconfinementoftheinsaneinthenineteenth-centuryâ,SocialHistoryofMedicine,10(1997),pp.137-55.7CathySmith,âLivingwithinsanity:narrativesofpoverty,pauperismandsicknessinasylumrecords1840-76â,inA.Gestrich,E.HurrenandS.King,eds.PovertyandsicknessinmodernEurope:narrativesofthesickpoor,1780-1938,(London,2012),pp.117-41.8EllenRoss,Loveandtoil:motherhoodinoutcastLondon1870-1918(Oxford,1993);Julie-MarieStrange,FatherhoodandtheBritishWorkingClass1865-1914(Cambridge,2015).9DobbingestablishedwhatproportionofthefirsthundredentriesinGarlandsâvisitorsbookfrom1900-1904werespouses,siblings,orparents,andsuggestedthisrevealedthesignificanceofsiblingbonds.However,asitisunclearwhetheradistinctionwasmadebetweenuniqueandrepeatvisitors,thestatisticalbasisofthisobservationmaybeunreliable.âFamilyâ,pp.143-4.10CatherineCox,NegotiatinginsanityinthesoutheastofIreland,1820-1900(Manchester,2012);AliceMauger,Thecostofinsanityinnineteenth-centuryIreland:public,voluntaryandprivateasylumcare(Basingstoke,2017).
6
workingoncolonialasylumshaveilluminatedhowfamilieswereaffected
emotionally.11CatharineColebornehasusedfamiliesâcorrespondencewith
asylumsinAustralasiatoexaminetherelationshipbetweenthecolonialfamily
andtheasylum,observingthatlettersâaffordusaglimpseofemotional
responsestomanagingmentalbreakdownâandinsightsâintothelivesof
familiesâ.12LikeColeborne,Iusefamiliesâcorrespondencetomovebeyondthe
wallsoftheasylumandunitethehistoriesoftheasylumandthefamily.Idothis
withinthecontextoflate-VictorianEngland,andwithafocusontheday-to-day
livesandexperiencesofthefamiliesofapproximately525patientscommitted
intoBroadmoorbetween1863and1900.
Broadmooropenedin1863inBerkshire.IthousedQueenâspleasure
patients,whohadcommittedacrimeandwerefoundinsanewhentried,and
insaneconvicts,whohadbeenconvictedofacrimeandimprisonedbefore
developinginsanityinprison.13ItspatientscamefromalloverEnglandand
Wales,14andunlikemanypatientsincountyasylumsmostwerealongwayfrom
theirfamilies.15LikeotherVictorianasylumsBroadmoorwasnotan
11CatharineColeborne,âFamilies,patientsandemotions:asylumsfortheinsaneincolonialAustraliaandNewZealand,c.1880â1910â,SocialHistoryofMedicine,19(2006),pp.425â42;Idem.Madnessinthefamily:insanityandinstitutionsintheAustralasiancolonialworld,1860-1914(Basingstoke,2010);Mary-EllenKelm,âWomen,familiesandtheProvincialHospitalfortheInsane,BritishColumbia,1905-1915â,JournalofFamilyHistory,19(1994),pp.177-93;BronwynLabrum,âLookingbeyondtheasylum:genderandtheprocessofcommittalinAuckland,1870â1910â,NewZealandJournalofHistory,26(1992),pp.125â44.12Coleborne,âFamiliesâ,pp.428,434.13ForBroadmoorâspatients,JadeShepherd,ââOneofthebestfathersuntilhewentoutofhismindâ:paternalchild-murder,1864-1900â,JournalofVictorianCulture,18(2013),pp.17-35;Idem.ââIamnotverywellIfeelnearlymadwhenIthinkofyouâ:malejealousy,murderandBroadmoorinlate-VictorianBritainâ,SocialHistoryofMedicine,30(2017),pp.277-98;Idem.ââIamverygladandcheeredwhenIhearthefluteâ:thetreatmentofcriminallunaticsinlate-VictorianBroadmoorâ,MedicalHistory,60(2016),pp.473-91.14SomecamefromScotland,Irelandandthecolonies.15Somecountyasylumpatientswerefarfromhome.CatherineCox,HilaryMarlandandSarahYork,âEmaciated,ExhaustedandExcited:TheBodiesandMindsoftheIrishinNineteenth-CenturyLancashireAsylumsâ,JournalofSocialHistory,46,2(2012),500â24
7
impenetrablewalledfortress.16Bywritingandvisitingfamilieswerealmost
ever-presentwithintheasylum.Usinghundredsofletters,whichsurvivein
patientsâcasefiles,Iexplorethematerialandemotionaleffectshavingarelative
committedintoBroadmoorhadonindividualfamilymembers.Historianshave
lamentedthescarcityofsuchsources,17andhaveextractedlaycommentary
frommedicalcasenotesandphysiciansâcasebooksbut,asJonathanAndrews
highlights,thesereportlayvoicesthroughthebiasedgazeofthephysician.18The
quantity,contentandcontextoftheBroadmoorlettersmakethemanunusually
richandunmediatedsourceforexaminingtheimpactsofasylumcommittalon
families.Wecanreadtheiremotionsandseeglimpsesoftheirday-to-daylives
andactions.QueenâsPleasurepatientsâfamiliesseeminglywrotethemostletters
andarethusthemainfocus,butinsaneconvictpatientsâfamiliesoccasionally
feature.19Whilefewerlettersfromthelatterappeartoexistthisdoesnotmean
theywereuncaring.SomeconvictsweretransferredtoBroadmoorwithouttheir
familiesâknowledge;somedidnothavethesamefamilialnetworksasQueenâs
pleasurepatients;andsuchnetworksâand/ortheinclinationtowritelettersâ
mayhavebeendiminishedbyconstraintsonletterwritingwhileinprison,which
âgreatlyreduced[letters]usefulnesstoanyonegenuinelyseekingtokeepalive
emotionalattachmenttosomeoneoutsideâ.20Thesurvivinglettersrevealthe
practicalsignificanceoffamilymembersârelationshipswiththeirincarcerated
relativesandtheeffectsonfamilies,bothduringarelativeâscommittalandafter
16EssaysinBartlettandWright,eds.,Outside;Coleborne,Madness;Idem.âFamiliesâ.17Dobbing,âFamilyâ.18JonathanAndrews,âCasenotes,casehistories,andthepatientâsexperienceofinsanityatGartnavelRoyalAsylum,Glasgow,inthenineteenthcenturyâ,SocialHistoryofMedicine,11(1998),pp.255â81.19MoreQueenâspleasurepatientsâcasefilescontainedlettersfromfamilymembersandingreaterquantitiesthaninsaneconvictsâfiles.20PhilipPriestley,Victorianprisonlives(London,1999),p.198.
8
theirdischarge.Because84percentofthosecommittedintoBroadmoor
between1863and1900wereworkingclass,thelettersalsoprovideanunusual
windowintoworking-classfamilylife,emotions,andsubjectivities.21Innormal
circumstancesworking-classfamiliesdidnottypicallyexchange(orkeep)
regularletters,22buttheenforcedseparationofcommittalencouragedepistolary
correspondence,andtheoralqualityoftheletterssuggeststhepoorwere
typicallywritingforthemselves.23Bothmaleandfemalefamilymembers,
sometimesfromwithinthesamefamily,wrotetoBroadmoor.Lettersoften
appeartoactassubstitutesforconversationsthatwecanimaginewouldhave
takenplaceinthehomeorinthesuperintendentâsofficehaddistancenot
necessitatedwrittencommunication.Accesstotheoriginalcorrespondenceis,
nevertheless,partial;whyparticularletterswerekeptorduplicatedis
indeterminablebutoftenonlyonesideoftheconversationremains,only
portionsofsomeletterswereretained,andoccasionallylegibilityisanissue.24
Nevertheless,theyareahighlyvaluablequalitativesource.Thepresenceof
patientsârepliestofamilymembersâlettersshowsthatsomereachedtheir
intendedrecipients.Whetherornotthesuperintendentcensoredletterseither
bynotpassingthemonorreadingthemtopatients,theydoshowwhatfamily
memberswantedtocommunicate.Theyareidealforexploringquestionsof
21JadeShepherd,âVictorianmadmen:Broadmoor,masculinityandtheexperiencesofthecriminallyinsane,1863â1900â(unpublishedPhDthesis,QueenMaryUniversityofLondon,2013),pp.59â62.22StevenKing,WritingthelivestheEnglishpoor1750s-1830s(Canada,2019),p.20;PennySummerfield,Historiesoftheself.Personalnarrativesandhistoricalpractice(London,2019),p.23.23InthisrespecttheyresemblethepauperlettersthatKingandLindseyEarner-Byrneexamined.King,Writing,pp.35-37;Earner-Byrne,ââDearfathermyhealthhasbrokendownâ:writinghealthinIrishcharityletters,1922-1940â,SocialHistoryofMedicine,28(2015),pp.849-68atp.852.24Astheasylumdidnotretainalllettersquantitativeanalysishaslimitedutility.
9
familyties,agencyandemotion.25Lettersbetweenfamilymembersandto
Broadmoorâssuperintendentprovideanintimateinsightintofamiliesâemotional
worldsinnineteenth-centuryEngland.Theydisplaylife,emotionsand
relationshipsastheywerelivedinrealtime,ratherthanastheywere
reimaginedinthecomposedautobiographicalaccountshistorianstendtorely
upontoexaminefamilylifeandsubjectivities.26
Thisarticleoffersthefirstsustainedexaminationoftheeffectsofasylum
committalonpatientsâindividualfamilymembers.Byshiftingfocusfromthe
effectsonpatientstotheeffectsonfamilies,andbytakinganewapproachâ
engagingwiththehistoryofthefamily,andfocusingonindividualfamily
members,consideringfactorsincludingage,class,gender,changeovertimeand
stageinlifecycleâthisarticleexaminesthereachandsignificanceoftheasylum
furtherbeyonditswalls.Ittellsanimportant,untoldnarrativefromthe
perspectiveoffamilymembersandopensnewinsightsintothehistoriesofthe
asylumandfamilylifeinthelatenineteenthcentury.Inthefirsthalfofthearticle
itisshownthateffectsofasylumcommittalonfamilieswerenotsolelyoreven
primarilyeconomic.Itaffectedtheirrelationshipsoutsideoftheasylum,and
theirsenseofself;oneâsroleinthefamilyâplayedanimportantpartintheâŠ
formulationofpersonalidentityâ,27andthelossofarelativetoBroadmoorforced
somefamilymemberstoreconfiguretheirrole.Nevertheless,despitethe
25Summerfield,Histories,p.28.26JoanneBailey(Begiato),âMasculinityandfatherhoodinEnglandc.1760-1830â,inJohnH.ArnoldandSeanBrady,eds.,Whatismasculinity?historicaldynamicsfromantiquitytothecontemporaryworld(NewYork,2011),pp.167-86;Idem.ParentinginEngland,1760-1830:emotion,identity,andgeneration(Oxford,2012);MeganDoolittle,âFatherhoodandfamilyshame:masculinity,welfareandtheworkhouseinlatenineteenth-centuryEnglandâ,inLucyDelap,BenGriffinandAbigailWills,eds.,ThepoliticsofdomesticauthorityinBritainsince1800(Basingstoke,2009),pp.84-108;EmmaGriffin,âTheemotionsofmotherhood:love,cultureandpovertyinVictorianBritainâ,AmericanHistoricalReview,123(2018),pp.60-85.27Bailey(Begiato),Parenting,p.143.
10
materialandemotionalhardshipssomefamilymembersfacedandthe
challengesposedtotheirday-to-livesandidentities,thesecondhalfofthearticle
showsthatfamilytiesandaffectiverelationshipsmatteredagreatdealto
working-classVictorians.Somefoundnewwaystogivemeaningtotheir
relationshipwiththeirincarceratedrelativedespitethedistancebetweenthem,
andtheysoughttogivemeaningâviatheirwordsandactionsâtotheirrelativeâs
lifedespitethehardshipstheircommittalintoBroadmoorhadcaused.Yetthis
continuedattachmenthadfurthercostsforfamilies.Wherefamilialsolidarity
persistedtheasylumhadlong-lastingandfar-reachingeffects,includingbeing
policedbytheasylumaslongastheirrelativelived,eveniftheywere
discharged.
II.
CommittalintoBroadmooroftenresultedinlongdistance,long-termseparation
betweenfamiliesandtheirincarceratedrelatives.Between1863and1900just9
percentofmalepatientsand25percentoffemalepatientswerereleasedfrom
theasylum.40percentofmaleand36percentoffemalepatientsdiedthere,
and38percentofmalepatientsand30percentoffemalepatientswere
transferredtotheirlocalcountyasylum28Howmanywerelaterreleasedfrom
theirlocalasylumisunknown.Theimmediateeffectsoflosingarelativeto
Broadmoorwereburdensome,butthelong-termimpactswereoften
devastating.Theeffectswerecontingentupon,andevolvedover,thecourseof
thelifecycle.Somefamilymembersovercamethedifficultiestheyfaced,but
othersdidnot,andhereweseetheinfluencegender,class,age,andrelationship
28Shepherd,âVictorianMadmenâ,p.123.
11
withtheirincarceratedrelativeandothershadonindividualsâabilityto
withstandhavingarelativeinstitutionalisedfarfromhome.
MostpatientsenteredBroadmoorduringtheprimeoftheirlives,between
theirmid-twentiesandearly-fortieswhentheentirefamilywasdependenton
menâsearnings,andwomenâsdomesticwork,includingchildcare[Tables1and
2].29Manyfamiliesthusfoundtheabsenceofaspouse,parent,orchildboth
financiallyandemotionallydifficult.
Table1.TheagesofmencommittedintoBroadmoorasapercentageofthepopulation.
Table2.TheagesofwomencommittedintoBroadmoorasapercentageofBroadmoorâsfemalepopulation.
29VictorBaileyidentifiesthisageasprimeoflife,âThisrashactâ:suicideacrossthelifecycleintheVictoriancity(Stanford,1998),p.186.
Ages1864-1867
1868-1872
1873-1877
1878-1882
1883-1887
1888-1892
1893-1897
1898-1900
Under18 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.8 1.6 1.318-27 16.8 27.5 21.5 18.8 20.7 15.5 17.5 17.528-37 29.0 33.5 39.9 39.3 32.4 29.2 35.0 33.838-47 22.0 22.7 25.2 19.4 18.6 29.9 26.8 21.348-57 15.4 10.9 6.7 14.1 17.0 17.4 10.9 10.058-67 6.8 3.9 3.7 7.3 8.0 5.3 6.6 12.568-77 1.9 0.3 1.8 1.0 2.7 1.1 1.6 3.878-87 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0Unknown 7.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ages1863-1867
1868-1872
1873-1877
1878-1882
1883-1887
1888-1892
1893-1897
1898-1900
Under18 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.018-27 27.0 25.0 25.5 21.1 26.8 15.6 24.6 25.028-37 29.1 37.5 34.5 35.5 35.2 34.4 38.5 20.838-47 25.0 27.8 34.5 31.6 29.6 34.4 21.5 29.248-57 8.8 6.9 5.5 7.9 5.6 10.9 10.8 12.558-67 2.7 1.4 0.0 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.1 8.368-77 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.278-87 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Unknown 7.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0
12
Bothhusbandsandwiveswerethrustintothedualroleofhomemakerand
providerandeachstruggled.Familyhistorianshaveshownhowinstrumental
womenweretotheVictorianhome;theywerewageearners,homemakersand
carers.30Yetfemalepatientsâfamiliesrarelysoughttoretrievemoney.One
familysoughtmoneyfortheirrelativeâsyoungdaughterbutperhapsonly
becausethechildâsfatherwasabsent.31Itisunsurprising,givenhowcentral
managingthehomeandcaringforchildrenwastoworking-classwives,thatthe
lossofahomemakerandmotherconcernedfamilies.Onepatientâsmotherasked
thesuperintendent:âdoyouthinkshewilleverbeabletomanageherfamily
anymore?â32ManyâdistressedâhusbandstoldBroadmoorâssuperintendentthey
wereâveryanxiousâtohavetheirwivesâhomeagainâ.33Someworriedthattheir
wiveswerenotseeingtheirchildrenenough.BridgetHartâshusbandcouldnot
affordtotakehisfivechildrentoBroadmoorandaskedthesuperintendent
whethershecouldbetransferredtotheirlocalasylumsoâthatshecouldseeher
childrenoftenâ.34Buthusbandsalsomissedtheircompanion.Theirlettersmake
theirloveandattachmentclear;AnnieInghamâshusbandlongedtomaintain
correspondencewithhiswife.35Thatthelossoffemalerelativeswasfeltinsuch
waysdemonstratesthestrengthofaffectivebonds.Whiletheirincomewould
notalwaysstretchtocoverthereturntrainfaretoBroadmoor,patientsâ
husbandswerenotordinarilythrustintopovertyasaresultoftheirwifeâs
committal.InhisstudyofVictoriansuicideVictorBaileyarguesthatthelossofa30EllenRoss,Love;ElizabethRoberts,Awomanâsplace:anoralhistoryofworking-classwomen1890-1940(Oxford,1984),p.136;JaneLewis,âTheworking-classmotherandstateintervention,1870-1918â,inJaneLewis,ed.,Labourandlove:womenâsexperienceofhomeandfamily(NewYork:1986),pp.99-120atp.107.31D/H14/D2/2/2/175/53,tosuperintendent.32D/H14/D2/2/2/178/5.33D/H14/D2/2/2/183/7;D/H14/D2/2/2/164/7;D/H14/D2/2/2/398/14.34D/H14/D2/2/2/184/6.35D/H14/D2/2/2/183/4,tosuperintendent.
13
spousedisruptedmenâsdomesticlivesmorethanwomenâs.36Anabsentwifewas
challengingforhusbands,andcertainlycausedemotionaldistress,butalthough
somemovedawaytowork,sometimesabroad,37andothersstartednew
families,38husbandswereseeminglymorewillingand(financially)ableto
preservetheirhomethanpatientsâwives.Theirabilitytoremainabreadwinner,
particularlybyrelyingupontheirsistersorsisters-in-lawtohelpcarefortheir
children,meanttheyhadlessneedtoreformulatetheirownroleinthefamily,or
thefamilystructure,thanpatientswives,whocorrespondencesuggestssuffered
more.
Inthelatenineteenthcenturybeingahusbandandfathermeantleading
andexertingauthorityoverthehousehold,andprovidingfinancially.Their
husbandsâabsenceforcedsomepatientsâwivestoreformulatetheiridentitiesby
assumingtheseresponsibilities.Insomeordinaryworking-classhouseholds
âmothersmadeapointoftheirhusbandsâauthorityâ;fatherswereâjudgeand
arbitersofrewardsandpunishments.â39Patientsâwivescouldhardlythreaten
âyouwaittillyourfathergetshomeâ,butsomedidrequesttheirincarcerated
husbandsperformanaspectoftheirpaternaldutybyexertingauthorityand
influenceovertheir(olderandgenerallymale)children.JosephReddingâswife
wrotetohimregardingtheirson:
Icanassureyouhehasbeenaverygreatdealoftroubleeversincehewas
15yearsoldâŠifonlyhewouldkeepfromhatefuldrinkâŠIthinkyouhad
36Bailey,Rash,pp.234-235.37D/H14/D2/2/2/183.38D/H14/D2/2/2/101.39HelenRogers,ââFirstinthehouseâ:daughtersonworking-classfathersandfatherhoodâinTrevBroughtonandHelenRogers,eds.,Genderandfatherhoodinthenineteenthcentury(Basingstoke,2007),pp.126â37atp.128.
14
betterwritetohimperhapsitwilldohimgoodforweareallvery
frightenedofhim.40
Inconjunctionwithrecentstudiesonfatherhood,suchcorrespondenceindicates
thatworking-classfatherswereunderstoodtobemorethanproviders,theirloss
feltinnon-materialways.41
Nevertheless,moneywasaconcern.Whatmanywivesneededfromtheir
husbandswasmoneytosupportthemselvesandtheirchildren.42Somesurvived
withouttheirhusbandâswagesorphysicalpresence.Onecontinuedher
husbandâsrope-makingbusiness,andothersclaimedtheirpensionsorsavings.43
Butsuchcaseswererarebecausemostmalepatientsdidnothavethesethings.
Financialsurvivalwaseasierforwiveswithfewornodependentchildren,or
witholderchildrenwhocouldcontributetothehouseholdeconomy.44Butmost
wiveswerelefttocareandprovidefortheiryoungchildrenalone,with
devastatingconsequences.Lowwagesandseasonalworkdisproportionately
affectedwomen,soevenifwomenwereinorfoundworktheirearningswould
nothavematchedtheirhusbands,45andemploymentwouldnotnecessarilyhave
significantlyreducedtheiranxieties:theystillhadhomestomaintainand
childrentocarefor.Thelimitedagencyworking-classwivespossessed,andin
40D/H14/D2/2/1/1102/71.41EssaysinBroughtonandRogers,eds.,Gender;EleanorGordonandGwynethNair,âDomesticfathersandtheVictorianparentalroleâ,WomenâsHistoryReview,15(2006),pp.551-9;VickyHolmes,InbedwiththeVictorians:thelife-cycleofworking-classmarriage(Basingstoke,2017),p.104;Julie-MarieStrange,âFatherhood,providingandattachmentinlate-VictorianandEdwardianworking-classfamiliesâ,HistoricalJournal,55(2012),pp.1007-27.42Ross,Love;Strange,Fatherhood,p.51.43D/H14/D2/2/1/905/18;D/H14/D2/2/1/887/5-17;D/H14/D2/2/1/811.44AnnaDavin,Growinguppoor:home,schoolandstreetinLondon,1870-1914(London,1996).45CarlChinn,Theyworkedalltheirlives:womenoftheurbanpoorinEngland,1880-1939(Manchester,1988),pp.86-8.
15
particulartheirinabilitytoliveindependentlyoftheirhusbands,46meanttheloss
ofahusbandwasinmanywaysmoretraumaticthanthelossofawife.
Numerousâanxiousâandâdesolateâwivesbeggedthesuperintendentfortheir
husbandâsreleasebecausetheyfearedstarvationandpoverty,asalsohappened
followingthedeathorprolongedun-orunderemploymentofabreadwinner.47
Tosurvive,somesoughtpoorreliefortookinlodgers.48Othershadlittlechoice
buttodismantletheirhomes.Someconsideredsellingtheirbelongings,but
othersremarriedorco-habited.49PatientArthurLudlowâswifehadan
illegitimatechild,andhissisterinformedhimâ[yourwife]considerssheis
utterlyfreefromyouandtendsdoingthebestforherselfandchildren.â50Some
wivesmadeharddecisions.Unabletosupportalloftheirchildren,RobertJonesâ
wifesenttheirten-year-olddaughtertoahomeforWaifsandStraysbecauseit
wasdeemedâbestfor[the]childasshewillhavetrainingaswellas[the]
comfortsofagoodhomeâwhichhermothercouldnotprovide.51PatientJoseph
Mallonâswifewasâveryanxiousâaboutherhusbandwhoâwasalwaysgoodand
dutifultomebeingaproviderto3helplesschildrenâ.52Afterthesuperintendent
explainedthatherhusbandâsreleasewasnotimminent,Mallonâswifetoldhim
thattheâoneshillingandsixpenceandoneloafofbreadâherlocalparishgave
herwasinadequate.SheaskedwhetherBroadmoorhadaschoolforpatientsâ
46Nineteenth-centurysocietyâassumedfemaledependencyâtobethenorm.Lewis,âworking-classwifeâ,p.106.47D/H14/D2/2/1/799/4and11;D/H14/D2/2/1/1689;D/H14/D2/2/1/1085/26;D/H14/D2/2/1/599/4.JoannaBourke,Working-classculturesinBritain1890-1960(London,1994),pp.71-81;Julie-MarieStrange,Death,griefandpovertyinBritain,1870-1914(Cambridge,2005),p.194;Strange,Fatherhood,p.56.48D/H14/D2/2/1/830/8,tosuperintendent;D/H14/D2/2/1/1102/33.Womenoftenusedlodgerstosupplementtheirincome,Roberts,Womanâs,p.141.49Forexample,D/H14/D2/2/1/829;D/H14/D2/2/1/900/9.50D/H14/D2/2/1310.51D/H14/D2/2/1/1680,tosuperintendent.52D/H14/D2/2/1/599/4,tosuperintendent.
16
childrenbecauseâIamnotabletosupportthemâŠIthinktheywouldbebetterin
aschoolIwastoldtherewasaschoolnowopenforthem.âHerepliedthatthere
wasânosuchschoolâ;whathappenedtothechildrenisunknown.53Mallonâswife
waslikelythinkingofschoolsforconvictsâchildren.54Otherpatientsâwivessent
theirchildrentosuchschoolsandbecausetheyweregenderedthissometimes
meantseparatingsiblings.55Thesecasessuggestthatunlikesomepatientsâ
husbands,andunlikewasthecaseinsomeareas,notallwomenhadaccessto
familialorcommunitysupportnetworkswithinwhichâauxiliaryparentsââ
relativesandneighboursâoperated.56Toavoidtheworkhousetheyhadto
choose;theycouldnotbebothbreadwinnerandhomemaker.Somefamilies
relocatedwhichexplainsthelackofkinship.Thestigmaofhavingacriminal
lunaticforarelativeâandtheshameattachedtobothcriminalityandinsanityâ
mighthaveledtosomefamiliesbeingshunnedbytheircommunitiesor
discouragedthemfromaskingforhelp.Unlikeordinaryasylumpatientswho
weresometimessecretlyadmittedbytheirfamilies,57Queenâspleasurepatients
wererarelysenttoBroadmoorwithouttheirneighboursâknowledge;press
coverageoftheircrimeandtrial,orbeingcalledtothewitnessstand,madesure
ofthat.
53D/H14/D2/2/1/599/6.ThePoorLawGuardiansrecognisedthatthisalone,themaximummostreceived,wasbarelyenoughtokeepfamiliesfromtheworkhouse.GingerFrost,Victorianchildhoods(London,2009),p.124.54From1866onwardsâdestitutechildrenofaservingprisonerâcouldbeadmittedintoindustrialschools.BarryGodfrey,PamelaCox,HeatherShoreandZoeAlker,Youngcriminallives:lifecoursesandlifechancesfrom1850(Oxford,2017),p.30.55D/H14/D2/2/1936a.56Ross,Love,p.156.Peoplewhostruggledexpectedfamilymemberstohelp,King,Writing,pp.75-81.57Somefamiliesrequestedprivacywhencommittingrelativesintoasylums.AkihitoSuzuki,Madnessathome:thepsychiatrist,thepatientandthefamilyinEngland,1820-1860(California,2006),p.121.
17
Patientsâparentswerebothgrief-strickenandthreatenedbythelossofa
malewageearner.Whilsttheymighthaveinitiallymanagedfinancially,long-
termdetentionwasmorelikelytohavenoticeablematerialeffectsontheirlives.
Financingoldagewasapressingconcernfortheagingworkingclass,forwhom
reducedemploymentopportunitiesensuredthespectreoftheworkhouse
loomedlarge.58Withoutstatepensions,manydependedupontheirwage-
earningchildren.59OnepatientâsfathertoldBroadmoorâssuperintendent:âIam
âŠgettingoldandifIcouldonlyobtainhislibertyhewouldbeofgreatassistance
tome.â60However,anddespitethematerialhardshipssomefeared,whilesome
patientsâspouseshadlittlechoicebuttoreframetheirroleinthefamily,patientsâ
parentsmighthaveachievedarenewedsenseofpurpose.Inordinarylife,some
agingmenandwomenstruggledwiththeirlossofparentalidentityastheir
childrenbecameindependent.61Effortstoassisttheirnow-dependentadultchild
mayhaveprovidedpatientsâparentstheopportunitytocontinue(orresume)
theirparentalrole.Sometriedtoinfluencetheirchildâsexperienceat
Broadmoor,toprovidereassurance,andpromisedtocareforthemifreleased.62
PatientMaryDysonâsfathertoldherthatherhusbandhadstartedanewfamily,
andinapowerfulstatementofattachmentheremindedherthatshewasnot
alone:âYouhaveagoodmotherandagoodfatherâŠyouhavefourbrothersand
58AkihitoSuzuki,âLunacyandlabouringmen:narrativesofmalevulnerabilityinmid-VictorianLondonâ,inRobertaBivinsandJohnV.Pickstone,eds.,Medicine,madnessandsocialhistory,essaysinhonourofRoyPorter(Basingstoke,2007),pp.118-28.59PatThane,OldageinEnglishhistory:pastexperience,presentissues(Oxford,2000),p.297.60D/H14/D2/2/1/1092/15.Also,D/H14/D2/2/1/900/5.Theexpectationthatchildrenmighthelpagingparentsisalsoevidentincaseswherepatientsâadultchildrenofferedtheirhomestothem.D/H14/D2/2/1/1085/21and23-28,tosuperintendent.Elderlymenfoundthemselvesunemployedandintheworkhousesoonerthanwomen.Davin,Growing,p.25.61Bailey,Rash,p.211.62D/H14/D2/2/1/900/4,topatientBall;D/H14/D2/2/1/900/5,tosuperintendent.Manyparentswereinalmostconstantcontactwiththesuperintendent.D/H14/D2/2/1/1068/22-56;D/H14/D2/2/1/901/5-25.
18
twosistersâ.HereassuredhisâDearDaughterâ,âifyougetyourlibertymyselfand
yourbrotherhasahomeandagoodoneforyouaslongasweliveâ.63Fathersof
sonsdemonstratedtheirattachmentintraditionalways,promisingtoprovide
workorvocationalinstructionuponrelease,muchastheymighthavedone
whentheywereonthecuspofadulthood.64Ofcourse,meetingtheneedsof
grownchildreninfantilizedbyinsanitymayhavebeenanadditionalstressfor
parentsfacingtheâmyriadlossesâofoldageâearnings,physicalability,andtheir
spouse.65
Establishinghowpatientsâyoungchildrenfeltaboutlosingaparenttothe
asylumisdifficult.66Youngchildrenâsguardiansoftencommunicatedmessages
fromthemtotheirincarceratedrelative:âgoodnightkissesâandwishes,anda
HappyChristmasandNewYear.67Thedifficultyofcajolingyoungchildreninto
verbalisingmessagesmighthaveencouragedtheauthortoembellishwiththe
aimofimprovingarelativeâsmorale.Certainly,someyoungchildrendidnot
appeartounderstandwhathadhappened,ortheimportanceoftheirwellwishes
ornewsoftheirwellbeingtotheirdetainedparent.MaryAnnDanielsâyoung
daughterwasbeingcaredforbyhermotherwhosentDanielsaphotograph(a
âlikenessâ)ofher.Whetherinadditiontovisiting,ortocompensateforan
inabilitytodoso,theprovisionofthiskeepsakecanbereadasanactofcare,
intendedtocomfortandreassure,yetthechildâsenergycausedaneedfor
63D/H14/D2/2/2/101/12.64D/H14/D2/2/1/974/3,tosuperintendent;ClaudiaNelson,FamilytiesinVictorianEngland(London,2007),p.91.65Bailey,Rash,p.212.66ToaccessVictorianchildrenâsexperienceshistorianshaveusedtrialtranscripts,officialdocuments,autobiographies,fictionand,whenpossible,letters.EssaysinJaneEvaBaxterandMeredithA.B.Ellis,eds.,Nineteenthcenturychildhoodsininterdisciplinaryperspective(Oxford,2018).67D/H14/D2/2/2/184/9,tosuperintendent;D/H14/D2/2/1/1076/11,toGeorgeVarschagen;D/H14/D2/2/1/925/7,Christmascard.
19
writtenreassurance:âyoumustnotthinkanythingaboutthatblackthatisupon
oneofhereyesbecauseshewoodnotsitstillâŠwecouldnotgethertositstill.â68
Olderchildrenweremoreconsciousofaparentâsabsence,especiallyat
particularpointsintheyearincludingChristmasandbirthdays.69
WecanassumethatforsomehavingaparentdetainedatBroadmoorwas
devastatingandconfusing,shakinganysemblanceofstabilityornormality.For
somethisbeganthemomenttheirparentcommittedacrime;somelostasibling
orparent;sometestifiedattheirparentâstrial.70Aparentâscommittalinto
Broadmoordisruptedachildâshomelife;notonlywas(atleast)oneparent
absent,butstepparents,stepsiblings,orhalf-siblingssometimesappeared.Some
childrenweresentawayfromhome,oraffectedbythepovertyandstarvation
fearedorfeltwithintheirhome.Thisalsohademotionalconsequences.Inher
studyofVictorianworking-classautobiographies,Julie-MarieStrangeobserved
thatâsomechildrenwereundoubtedlycontemptuousinadulthoodoffathers
whohadnotdoneenoughtosupportfamilies.â71ThisappearsintheBroadmoor
correspondence,too.Astheyaged,andperhapshavinghadtimetoreflectupon
theirchildhood,someolderchildrencriticizedtheirfatherforleavingtheir
motherdestitute.Manyyearsafterhewasconfined,Dodwellsentnumerous
lettershomeaccusinghiswifeofinfidelity.72LikeotherVictorianchildrenwho
retrospectivelyviewedtheirpoorandhard-workingmothersasâself-sacrificingâ
68D/H14/D2/2/2/175/22.Grandparentshadalonghistoryofprovidingâsubstituteparentingâ.Bailey(Begiato),Parenting,p.204.69D/H14/D2/2/1/936a/204;D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/28.70Shepherd,âBestâ.71Strange,Fatherhood,p.80.72D/H14/D2/2/1/936c.
20
andâheroicâ,hiseldestson,Henry,defendedhismotherandwhilstdoingso
highlightedDodwellâsfailureasafathertoprovide:73
motherhasbehavedinawaythatwouldbeamodeltoanotherwoman
leftwithafamilyoffouryoungchildren,owingthelast16yearsofherlife
hasbeenoneofanxietyandmisery,andtimesscarcelynotknowing
wherethenextmealwastocome.74
Somechild-parentrelationshipsweremaintainedthrough
correspondence,evolvingaschildrenaged.Asalsooccurredinordinary
circumstances,whenchildrenbecamelessreliantuponparentsforprovision
theyinsteadsoughtadvice.75Sonsinparticulardetailedtheirdailystrugglesto
theirfathers,perhapshopingtoreceivesomeguidance.76Othersonsrejected
theirfatherâsattemptstoguidethem.DodwellwrotetoHenryatwork,relating
hisgrievancesandadvisinghimtochangeemployment.Henryresponded:âI
thinkItoldyouoncebeforethattherewerenolettersallowedinthestores,but
withinthislastweekIhavereceivedtwonotes,whichIthankyoufornearly
gettingmedischargedâ.Hecontinued,âIdonâtwishtoreceiveanymoreworrying
lettersâŠneitheramIgoingtobetalkedoverbyanyonetodowhatIdonotwish
todoâ.77Suchattemptstodenyfatherstheopportunitytofulfilltheirpaternal
rolewerenotnecessarilytheresultofhardfeelingscausedbytheir
incarceration,butmirrortensionsbetweenordinaryVictorianfathersandtheir
sons.78
73Davin,Growing,p.26;Griffin,âEmotionsâ.74D/H14/D2/2/1/936c/104,toDodwell.75Strange,Fatherhood,p.41.76D/H14/D2/2/1/765/23.77D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/166.78Nelson,Family,p.93.
21
Somefamiliesweredeterminedtoprotectchildrenfromthetraumaof
visitingorhearingfromtheirrelative,butthiscouldresultinfamilytension.
PatientAnnieInghamâsseven-year-oldsonwastoldshehaddied,discovering
thetruthten-yearslater.79Wecanonlyimaginethesubsequenttensionbetween
himandhisfatherwhohadkeptthesecret.Inothercases,thetensioncausedby
effortstoprotectchildrenisexplicit.Bytheirownaccounts,Dodwellâschildren
missedhimterriblywhentheywereyoung,butDodwellâsdaughterlater
confessedtoherfatherthattheirmotherhadencouragedthemnottowrite,80
andtheirmotheraskedthesuperintendenttosendlettersintendedforthe
childrentoherbecauseâtheyprovetobeofdisadvantagetotheyoungpeople.â81
Dodwellâscaseisunusualbecauseitwasassumedthathischildrenwerebetter
offwithouthim.ThechaplainandmasteratEmmanuelHospitalexplainedhis
concernstoBroadmoorâssuperintendent,echoingthemessageofReligiousTract
Societystoriesinwhichabsentorinadequatefathersneededreplacingwithan
appropriatemalerolemodel:82
Ihavedonemybesttobenefithischildren...Ifearthatifheweresetfree,
itcouldbeoflittlegoodtohischildren.Hewouldremovehiseldestboy
fromherewhereheisgettingausefuleducation,goodfoodandevery
possiblecare,andhisotherchildrenfromtheirplaceofshelter.
Heexpressedhisfearsclearly:âIthinkthefirstthingistoprotectthispoorfamily
fromtheâŠutter[devastation]thatwouldensueifthefatherweresetfree.â83The
79D/H14/D2/2/2/183/33,tosuperintendent.80D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/28.81D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/195.82StephanieOlsen,âTheauthorityofmotherhoodinquestion:fatherhoodandthemoraleducationofchildreninEngland,c.1870â1900â,WomenâsHistoryReview,18(2009),pp.765-80atp.772.83D/H14/D2/2/1/936a/209-10.
22
confusionanddistressthatresultedfromhavinganincarceratedparent,andthe
subsequenteffortsoffamilyandfriendstoprotectchildren,appearedtoinspire
withinsomechildren(whowerecomingofageandperhapslongingtoexercise
someindependence)adesiretodemonstratetheirfilialduty,anotiongrounded
inscripture:thehonouringofoneâsmotherandfather.Unlikesomepatientsâ
spouseswhoreconfiguredtheiridentitiesorassumednewrolesinorderto
survive,patientsâyoungchildrenretainedtheiridentitiesasdutifulchildren.
Dodwellâsyoungestson,Edward,ranawayfromschooltovisithisfather,
perhapsinfluencedbyhisfatherâsnumerouslettersdemandingheandhis
siblingsremainâfaithfulâtohim.84Assomechildrenagedanevolutioninthe
child-parentrelationshipisevidentintheircorrespondence(orlackof).Edward
stoppedwritingtoandvisitinghisfather,buthisbrother,Henry,despitethe
angrylettershehadpreviouslysenttohisfather,continuedtocorrespondwith
himandBroadmoorâssuperintendents.Asheaged,Henryindulgedhisfatherâs
quirksanddemands,expressingcompassionandpityforafatherhecameto
perceiveasâfragileâratherthanfailing.85Itisclearthathavingaparentat
Broadmoor,asituationakintohavinganeglectfulorabsentfather,didnot
alwaysstrainparent-childrelationshipsbeyondrepair.AnthonyOwstonâssons
wereveryyoungwhenhemurderedtheirmotherandwassenttoBroadmoor,
buttheyremainedaconstantandsupportivepresenceinhislifeuntilhis
death.86ThisresearchsupportswhatStrangefoundinherexaminationof
autobiographies:âwhenprovidingfaltered,father-childdynamicsmightcome
understrainbut,inlongview,couldsurviveandbecomemanifestinalternative84Hevisitedhimthirty-fivetimesinFebruary1885.D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/67,memorandum;forexample,D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/47,lettertoâundutifulâdaughter.85StrangedevelopstheideaofaâfragileâfatherinFatherhood,pp.49-81.86D/H14/D2/2/1/963.
23
ways.â87Moreover,thatcorrespondenceallowsustoseethisinrealtime
confirmsthatthisisnotaneffectofrose-tintedautobiographicalwriting,but
evidenceofresilientparent-childbonds.
HavingarelativecommittedintoBroadmoorhadeffectsthatspreadfar
beyondtheasylumwallsandintothewiderfamilyandcommunity.Duringthe
nineteenthcenturysomepoorfamilieslivedincloseproximitytooneanother
andprovidedmutualsupport.88Thishelpedtorelievetheburdenonsome
familieswho,withoutaccesstoformalorcharitablesupportnetworksforthe
familiesoftheinsane,unitedtosupportandprotecteachotherfinanciallyand
emotionally.Effortstoprotectthosedirectlyaffecteddrewothersinto
correspondencewiththeasylum.Onepatientâsbrotherbeggedthe
superintendenttoreleasehissisterbecausehewasconcernedabouttheir
âdisparingâmother,89andafriendofapatientâswifeâawarethatshewas
âsometimessubjecttoviolenthystericalfitsââaskedthesuperintendentto
preventâthepoorwomanmuchmiseryâbydissuadingherfromvisiting
Broadmoor.90Somefamilymemberstriedtosurviveandmoveforwardintheir
ownway:thefatherwhotoldhissonhismotherwasdead;themotherwhotried
tostopherchildrenfromcommunicatingwiththeirfather;thespouseswho
remarried;theworrieddaughter-in-lawwhosecretlybeggedthesuperintendent
torejectherhusbandâspetitionforthereleaseofhisfather.91Buteachofthese
methodsofsurvivalpotentiallycarriedfurtherdamagingconsequences:tension,
87Strange,Fatherhood,p.81.88Thane,Oldage,p.299;D.CooperandM.Donald,âHouseholdsandâhiddenâkininearly-nineteenthcenturyEnglandâ:fourcasestudiesinsuburbanExeter,1821-1861â,ContinuityandChange,10(1995),pp.257-78.89D/H14/D2/2/2/175/48.90D/H14/D2/2/1/918/16.91D/H14/D2/2/1/1076/18.
24
conflictandsecrecywithinthehome.Correspondencerevealsstrugglesbetween
familymembersthatmightnothaveordinarilyexisted.PatientCharlesCornishâs
wifewasadmonishedbyherâpig-headedoldmother-in-lawâwhoâreproaches
herwithneglectâbecauseshewasreluctanttovisitherhusband.92Suchcases
werenotunusual,93andpatientsbecamethesubjectoftensionbetweenmarital
andbloodrelationswhich,innormalcircumstances,theymighthavemediated.
Theprecedingdiscussionshowslosingawageearnerorhomemakerhad
significanteffectsonthefamily,notonlypotentiallycausingpovertybutalsothe
temporaryorpermanentreconfigurationofthefamily,relianceuponkinship
networkstomaintainthefamilyâshealthandintegrity,andshapingfamilial
relationships.Importantly,itdemonstratesthatwhoenteredtheasylum
mattered:theeffectsonandconcernsoffamilymembersdependedontheir
relationshipwiththepatient.Forspouses,genderandclassaffectedthe
significanceoftheimpacts,butanindividualâslifestageandabilitytoaccess
supportnetworkswerealsoimportant.Unsurprisingly,thosewithlimited
agencyfelttheimpactsoflosingarelativetoBroadmoorthemost.Somewives
andparentsnotonlyfelteffectsimmediately,butalsoforfeitedtheirimagined
financiallysecurefuturebecausethatexpectationwaspremiseduponprovision
bytheirspouseorchild.Wivesalsofacedthegreatestchallengetotheirsenseof
self,particularlyiftheyhadtodismantletheirhome,allowotherstocarefor
theirchildren,orassumeanunexpectedrole.Thismayexplainwhymarriage
appearstohavebeenthemostfragilebond,whilebloodkinshipprovedmore
resilient.Examiningtangible,structuraleffectsonpatientsâfamiliesalsoreveals
92D/H14/D2/2/1/918/16-17,tosuperintendent.93D/H14/D2/2/1/1254/56,medicalreport.
25
theemotionalimpacts.Whilefamilymembersresponseswerecomplexand
oftencontradictory,changingovertimeandinrelationtotheirownlifestage,
theysuggesttheimportanceandresilienceoffamilialties.Cuttingacrossthe
differencesinexperienceisthewaythatfamilymembersexpressedtheirloss:
theywereâbereavedâ,âheartbrokenâandâanxiousâ.94Butirrespectiveofthe
heartacheandhardshipstheirrelativeâsincarcerationhadcaused,somefamilies
wereunwillingtoabandonthemtoBroadmoor.
III.
Familiesâanger,fearandsadnessathowtheirliveshadturnedoutandloveand
affectiontowardstherelativewhohadcausedthosefeelingswerenotmutually
exclusive.Thissectionexaminesfamiliesâwordsandactions,includingvisiting,
toshowhowsomeunitedtosupportoneanotherandtodemonstratetheir
continuedattachmenttotheirrelative.
Letterwritingwasanimportantmeansbywhichfamiliescommunicated
withrelativesinasylums.Inanefforttokeepthempartofthehome,theyshared
excitingandmundanefamilynews,soughtadvice,consoledrelativeswhenthey
wereillorscared,admonishedthemiftheymisbehaved,andcommunicated
theiraffectionexplicitlyintheirsalutations.95Familymembersplacedemotional
valueontheirletters,whichcouldlessentheemotionalifnotphysicaldistance
betweenthem.Uponhearingthathisfatherwasâverydepressedandrestlessin
94D/H14/D2/2/1/901/4-5;D/H14/D2/2/2/174/20;D/H14/D2/2/2/173/5;D/H14/D2/2/1/1102/58;D/H14/D2/2/1/791/6,alltosuperintendent.95D/H14/D2/2/1/936a/241,toDodwell;D/H14/D2/2/2/101/7,toDyson;D/H14/D2/2/1/569/2,toJones.NumerousfamilymembersreferredtotheirâDearârelative.Itwasnotmerelyaformalitybut,asDavidFitzpatricknotedinhisstudyofIrishandAustralianmigrantletters,wasusedtoassureâthereaderthatfamilialsolidaritywasintactâ.Oceansofconsolation:personalaccountsofIrishmigrationtoAustralia(Cork,1994).p.22.
26
mindâAnthonyOwstonâssontoldthesuperintendent:âIamwritingtomyfather
andtrustthatthelettermaybehandedtohimasIthinkthataletterfromhome
maybeofgreatvaluetohimatthepresentcrisis.â96Hedescribedanotherletter
tohisfatherasâcheeringâ.97Letterswerenotsimplycheeringplatitudes,
however,butsincere,intimatecommunicationbetweenandaboutrelatives.
Somefamilymemberssenttheirrelativeupbeat,comfortingletterswhilst
simultaneouslywritinganxiety-riddenletterstothesuperintendent,suggesting
aclearawarenessofaudienceandtheperformativityinvolvedinwriting.One
patientâsmotherbeggedthesuperintendenttoâtakepityonherpooraged
motherâŠIcannotexpressmyhartfeltgriefâŠrelievemeofthisdistressand
restoremydaughtertomeagainorIwillbringmygrayhareandsorrowtothe
graveâ.98Althoughclearlyfeelingwretched,thismotherstillencouragedher
daughtertoâkeepyourspiritsupâ.99ForsomefamilymembersBroadmoorâs
superintendentbecameaconfidant;100theysharedtheirtroublesandsome
confessedtheywerekeepingconcernsorcircumstancesfromtheirrelatives,a
situationakintowhatDavidGerbercalledanâepistolarymasquerade.â101Given
thattheyomittedbadnewsorworriesorembellishedthefamilyâswellbeingto
protecttheirrelative,however,thisshouldbereadasanactofcareandlove.102
Letterstothesuperintendenthighlighttheexistenceofanxietiesshared
byfamilymembersaroundtheworld;theysoughtreassurancethatrelatives
96D/H12/D2/2/1/963/18.97D/H14/D2/2/1/963/31.98D/H14/D2/2/1/175/51.99D/H14/D2/2/2/175/11.100Thishappenedelsewhere.Wannell,âPatientsâ,pp.307-8;Smith,âThankfulâ,pp.239-42.101DavidGerber,âEpistolarymasquerades:actsofdeceivingandwithholdinginimmigrantlettersâ,inBruceElliot,DavidGerberandSuzanneSinke,eds.,Lettersacrossborders:theepistolarypracticeofinternationalmigrants(London,2006),pp.144-57.102AsMichaelRopersuggestedofsoldiersomittingdangerintheirletterstotheirmothers,Thesecretbattle.EmotionalsurvivalintheGreatWar(Manchester,2009),pp.63-8.
27
wereeating,healthyandwelltreated,particularlyiftheyhadnotheardfrom
them.103Familieswhoreceivedârationalâandâsaneâlettersfromrelatives
struggledtounderstandoraccepttheirmedicaldiagnosis.104Othersaskedabout
theirrelativeâsillnessorchancesofrelease.105Requestsforinformationsuggest
concernandattachment,asdorequestsforthesuperintendentâsassistance.
Someaskedhimtodosomethingontheirbehalf,forinstancecompassionately
deliveringsadnewstoarelative.106Othersaskediftheycouldsenditemsâ
photographs,musicalinstrumentsandclothingâtohelptheirrelativemakea
homeforthemselves.107Regardlessofhowmuchtheycared,familymembersâ
letterstothesuperintendentwereâsupplicationsâ;theysoughtactionbut
ârecognisedthediscretionarypoweroftherecipient.â108Supplicationstomedical
mencontainedanemotionalperformance,anditisfruitfultoseethem,like
Coleborne,asaâtheatreofemotionsâ.109Thesuperintendentâspowerincentivized
familymemberâsexpressionsoftheiremotionalandpracticalneedforhis
assistance.Attentivenesstothisdynamicrevealsfamilymemberâsattemptsto
exerciseagencyandthattheyunderstoodtheiragencyascircumscribedbythe
powerofthesuperintendent.Suchemotionalperformancesalsoillustratethe
strengthoftheirfamilialattachment,explicitlyinwhatwasrevealedtothe
superintendent,andimplicitly,inthedecisiontocommunicatethattheymissed
103D/H14/D2/2/1/1116;D/H14/D2/2/1/905/12;D/H14/D2/2/1/836/6.Wannell,âPatientsâ;Coleborne,âFamiliesâ.104D/H14/D2/2/1/175/45,tosuperintendent.Also,D/H14/D2/2/1/1092/15;D/H14/D2/2/1/901/10.Thishappenedelsewhere.Coleborne,Madness,p.82;Walsh,âLunaticâ.105AsOonaghWalshfound,âLunaticandcriminalalliancesinnineteenth-centuryIrelandâ,inBartlettandWright,eds.,Outside,pp.132-52atp.145.106D/H14/D2/2/2/178/7;D/H14/D2/2/2/212/16;D/H14/D2/2/1/975/13;D/H14/D1/2/1/936b/208;D/H14/D2/2/1/975/13.107D/H14/D2/2/1/918/3.108AndreasWurgler,âVoicesfromamongsttheâSilentMassesâ:humblepetitionsandsocialconflictsinearlymoderncentralEuropeâinL.-H.vanVoss,ed.,Petitionsinsocialhistory(Cambridge,2001),pp.11-34,inKing,Writingp.49.109Coleborne,âFamiliesâ,p.437.
28
andcaredfortheirrelativewithoutburdeningthemwiththeirownheartache
anddifficulties.
Somefamiliesperformedtheirattachmentbyvisitingasylums,yetfew
historianshaveexplicitlyconsideredwhatthisrevealsaboutfamilylifeand
emotions.Visitinginstitutions,asJonathanReinarzandGrahamMooneywrite,
offeredsupporttopatientsandâprovidedanintimatelinktoafamiliarworld
thatistemporarily,orevenpermanently,outofreach.â110Ofcoursefamilies
visitedBroadmoortoreassurerelativestheyhadnotbeenforgotten.Patient
WilliamLloydâsfatherwasdesperatetoknowifhissonrememberedthathis
motherandbrothershadvisitedhim,andaskedthesuperintendenttoâpleaselet
himknowâŠthatsomeoneelsewillcomesoonâ.111Inanotesuggestingfamiliesâ
actionsweremonitored,thesuperintendenttoldtheHomeOfficethatone
patientâswifeâhasallalongbeenmostkindandattentivetoherhusbandinevery
wayandsherentedahouseinthisneighbourhoodsothatsheshouldbeableto
comeandseehimfrequently.â112Butvisitingalsobenefittedfamilies.Unlikeat
ordinaryasylumswherefamiliesmighthaveencounteredtheasylumupontheir
relativeâsadmission,thefamiliesofBroadmoorâspatientsmightonlyhaveread
abouttheasyluminthepress,whichsometimesprintedsensationalimagesofits
âFrankensteinâ-likepatients.113Visitingmayhaverelievedfearsaboutwho
relativesâwerelivingalongside,andenabledfamiliestowitnessthekindnessand
respect(theyhoped)relativesreceived.114Italsohelpedtoeaseemotional
110GrahamMooneyandJonathanReinarz,âHospitalandasylumvisitinginhistoricalperspective:themesandissuesâ,inMooneyandReinarz,eds.,Permeablewalls:historicalperspectivesonhospitalanasylumvisiting(Amsterdam,2009),pp.7-30atp.9.111D/H14/D2/2/1/761/5.112D/H14/D2/2/1/1254/56.113âAvisittotheCriminalLunaticAsylumâ,TheTimes,13Jan.1865,p.10.114Somerelativesexpressedreliefthattheyhadencounteredtheirrelativeinagoodcondition.
29
distressbytemporarilyreunitingfamilies.
Aselsewherethough,manyfoundtheprospectandtheactofvisiting
emotionallytesting.Theymighthave(orhavefeared)adistressingencounter
witharelativewhomtheyfoundinaworseconditionthanexpected,orreceive
abusefromapreviouslylovingrelative.115Theasylumâsvisitorâsroom
sometimesbecameasiteofdomestictension.Dodwellâsdaughterleftthe
visitorâsroomâintearsâafterhescoldedherforquestioninghim.116Onepatient
enteredthevisitorâsroomandâembracedthechildren,buthemotionedwithhis
handforhiswifetokeepbackâandtoldher,âyoubeastkeepback,orIwillfloor
youâ.Shetoldthesupervisingattendant,âIwillgoitonlyirritateshimmybeing
hereâ.117Thatsomefamilymembersvisiteddespitethepracticalandemotional
challengesitposedindicatesthestrengthoftheirattachmentandthe
significancetheyplacedupontheact.Thedevotionofonepatientâshusbandis
evidencedbyhisvisits.Thesuperintendentrecorded,âwhenherhusbandvisited
her,andspenttheportionsofthreedayswithher,sherefusedtospeakto
him.â118Despitehiswifeâssilence,hereturnedtositwithhereverydayforthree
days.Wecannotknowwhyhereturned,butunlikeotherrelativeswhoaskedthe
superintendentwhethervisitingwasworthwhile(wouldthepatientrecognize
them?wouldtheyspeaktothem?),thishusbandappearsunconcernedwithsuch
matters.Ofcourse,hemighthavehopedhiswifewouldtalktohim,butwhen
115FrederickCrawleyâssisterâwasgrievedtofindhimsolowandillâ,D/H14/D2/2/1/698/7,tosuperintendent;D/H14/D2/2/1/761/5;CatharineColeborne,âChallenginginstitutionalhegemony:familyvisitorstohospitalsfortheinsaneinAustraliaandNewZealand,1880s-1890sâ,inMooneyandReinarz,eds.,Permeable,pp.289â308atp.301;GeoffreyReaume,Remembranceofpatientspast:patientlifeatTorontohospitalfortheinsane,1870-1940(Oxford,2000,p.189.116D/H14/D2/2/1/936c/51,attendantâsnote.117D/H14/D2/2/1/1256/14,attendantâsnote.118WilliamOrange,ReportsofthesuperintendentandchaplainofBroadmoorCriminalLunaticAsylumfortheyear1875(London,1876),p.44.
30
facedwiththepossibilitythateachdaywouldbethesame,hewouldseemingly
rathersitwithherinsilencethannotatall.Wedonothaveaccesstohis
conversationswiththesuperintendentormedicalofficers,wedonotknowwhat
words,ifany,hespoketohiswife.Thereisnoexplicitrecordofemotioninthis
case;therearenoreferencestosadness,angerorfear,asinsomeotheraccounts.
Thisdoesnotmeanthehusbanddidnotfeelthemofcourse,andifotherfamily
membersâaccountsofvisitingareconsidereditispossiblethatratherthan
takingsolacefrombeinginhiswifeâspresencehefoundhisvisitsheartbreaking.
Somepatientsâcasefilescontainvisitorâsslipsdetailingwhovisitedand
when.Theydonotallhavethem,anditmightbeassumedthatpatientsâreceived
novisitorsandwere,assomepatientsâcomplainedandfeared,andassome
historianshavededuced,âabandonedâbytheirfamilies.119Certainlynotall
familieswerewillingtovisitarelativewhosecrimeandasylumcommittalhad
causedthemmisery,120buttheexistenceoffew,nooradwindlingnumberof
visitorsâslipsisnotnecessarilyevidenceofdesertion.Notonlymightsomehave
beenlostintherecord-keepingprocess,butexaminingcorrespondencetothe
superintendentrevealsvariousreasonswhyfamiliescouldnotorwouldnot
visit,significantlyaddingtoourunderstandingsofthereachandimpactofthe
asylumwhilstsimultaneouslyhighlightingaffectivefamilialrelationships.There
aretheexpectedpracticalreasons;itrequiredmoneyandtime,bothofwhich
manyfamilieslacked,tomakethe(oftenlong)journeytoBroadmoor.121Joseph
Reddingâswifecouldnotvisitforâtworeasons.IhavenothadthemeansasIwas
119D/H14/D2/2/1/936b/57,toattendant;D/H14/D2/2/1/936c/10,fromDodwelltoson.Reaume,Remembrance,p.196.120D/H14/D2/2/1/1310,medicalreport.121LetterstosuperintendentinD/H14/D2/2/1/969/8;D/H14/D2/2/1/1230/2;D/H14/D2/2/1/918/9.
31
leftwithsixchildrenandmyselftoprovidefor.Ihavealsobeensufferingwith
changeoflife.ThereasbeenmanyobsticlesinmywaywhichIhavenotwanted
totroublehimwith.â122TheneedtohidetroublesformedpartofReddingâs
justification;similartoomissionsinletters,notvisitingwasframedasanactof
care.Practicalbarrierscouldbeinsurmountable,butemotionalbarrierscouldbe
too.Somefamilymemberstriedtopre-empt(andavoid)emotionallydifficult
visits.Manyworriedthattheirrelativehadlosttheirsenseofself,andthe
potentialheartbreakofencounteringsomeonetheydidnotrecognizedeterred
somefromvisiting.123Othersresistedvisitingbecausetheydreadedsaying
goodbye.Followinghisfatherâsdeathonemantoldthesuperintendent:
Thankingyouverymuchforlettingmeknow.Ifeelitverymuchindeedas
wehavebeenthinkingofcomingtoseehimallthewinterâŠbutitseems
wearetoolateandIfeelnowIcanâtseehimaliveitisnousetoseehim
buried...IonlywishIhadcomebeforebutIdreadedthepartingso
much.124
Itwasnotalwaysthevisititselfthatfamiliesdisliked,butthenearinevitabilityof
travellinghome,alone,attheendoftheday.125
IV.
Somefamilymemberspetitionedfortheirrelativeâsrelease,seekingtoreduce
thematerialandemotionalburdenswritingtoorvisitingBroadmoor(orthe
inabilitytodoso)hadcaused.Butdoingsoandtherealitiesoffamilylifepost-
122D/H14/D2/2/1/1102/70.123D/H14/D2/2/2/183/9,tosuperintendent.124D/H14/D2/2/1/659/9.125D/H14/D2/2/1/1705.
32
dischargesometimescausedfurtherheartache,andfurthercurtailedfamiliesâ
agency.
Applyingforreleasewasabureaucratic,time-consumingprocess.
PatientsâfamiliespetitionedtheHomeOffice,whichrequestedamedicalreport
andthesuperintendentâsopinion.Thisexposedthefamilytoscrutinyand
judgment,anditwasusuallyunsuccessful.Thatmanyfamiliesdiditanyway,
sometimesoftenandovermanyyears,suggeststhestrengthoftheir
attachment.126Correspondencerevealsvariousreasonswhyfamilieswanteda
relativehome.Lookingatotherasylums,historianshavearguedthateconomic
concernsdrovefamiliesâpetitions,butthismisrepresentsthecomplexityof
familiesâlivesandfeelings.127Whilepovertymotivatedsomepetitionsto
Broadmoor,economicconcernswerenotalwaysthedrivingoronlyfactor.
Familieswantedrelativeshomebecausetheylovedandmissedthemandâdid
notlikeâthethoughtofthemdyingatBroadmoor;moreovertheyofferedto
financiallysupporttheirrelativeuponrelease.128Additionally,thesemotivations
arenotmutuallyexclusiveandstrongemotionalattachmentspersisteddespite
financialhardship.
Successfulpetitionsusuallyresultedinaconditionaldischarge,which
legallyobligatedthepetitioningfamilymembertocarefortheirrelativeandto
reportchangesintheirmentalandphysicalconditiontotheHomeOfficeandto
Broadmoorindefinitely.Evenifpatientsexhibitedâsaneâtraits,includingthe
126Notallfamilieshadroomforawageearner,carer,orparentwhoseroleinthehomewasrenderedvoidbytheircommittalintoBroadmoor,andsomerefusedtocareforthemshouldtheybereleased.Spaceconstraintspreventthisbeingunpackedhere.127Smith,âLivingâ;Smith,âThankfulâ,pp.246-8.FamiliesoftheIrishinsanehighlightedtheirfinancialburdens.Mauger,Cost,pp.74and100.128Forexamplecases:D/H14/D2/2/1/976/39;D/H14/D2/2/1/1085;D/H14/D2/2/1/974/3;D/H14/D2/2/1/366;D/H14/D2/2/1/1076;D/H14/D2/2/1/186;D/H14/D2/2/1/999/15.
33
abilitytoworkandself-control,theirdischargecouldberefused,129becausethe
superintendentwasunconvincedaboutthepetitioningfamilymemberâs
characterorabilitytocareforandsupervisetheirrelative.Applicationswere
thusastageuponwhichfamilymembersperformedtheiremotionsandtheir
lives.Clearlyawareoftheexpectationsplaceduponthem,somedescribedtheir
homes,supportivefamilynetworks,theiremploymentandrelativefinancial
stability.130Justaspatientsâmighthaveperformedtheirrecoveriesinaneffortto
securerelease,andasColebornenotes,familymembersmightalsohave
performedtohelpsecurethereleaseofarelativetheyneededathome.131
Petitionsemphasizedfamilialbonds,particularlythe(alleged)willingness
offemalefamilymembers,especiallysistersandsisters-in-law,tocarefor
dischargedrelatives.132Women,seenasthemoralcornerstoneoffamiliallife,133
typicallyboretheresponsibilityforfamilialcareinVictoriansociety,134with
sistersexpectedtoassumeaparentalroleifrequired.135Whentryingtosecure
thereleaseofhisbrother-in-law,JohnMelloremphasizedthestrengthofsibling
bondstothesuperintendent:
mygoodwifehissisterbeinglikeamothertohimâŠhasapowerof
controloverhimthatmakesmehavenodoubtâŠifheisreleasedandsent
129Shepherd,âVerygladâ,p.476.130D/H14/D2/2/1/1102/58,tosuperintendent;D/H14/D2/2/1/714/7,tosuperintendent.131Coleborne,âFamiliesâ,p.438.132D/H14/D2/2/1/186/26,tosuperintendent.133LĂ©onoreDavidoff,Thickerthanwater:siblingsandtheirrelations,1780-1920(Oxford,2012),p.131.134DavidWright,âFamilialcareofâidiotâchildreninVictorianEnglandâ,inHordonandSmith,eds.,Thelocusofcare:families,communities,institutions,andtheprovisionofwelfaresinceantiquity(London,1998),pp.176-97atpp.182-3.135Nelson,Family,pp.110-11;Frost,Victorian,p.18.
34
herehewillbesafeandcaredforinamannerthatwillenablehimto
becomeausefulmemberofsociety.136
Otherfamiliesofferedtomakespaceforandcarefortheirrelativeintheiroften
alreadyover-crowdedhomes.137Itistellingthatsomefamilieswerewillingand
abletoopentheirhomestoarelativewhosecrimeandcommittalhadcaused
themsuffering,butsomewereevenpreparedtowelcomeunrelatedcriminal
lunatics.Oneformerpatientâshusband,perhapsrecognisingthatitwould
increasethehappinessofhisdischargedwife,offeredahomeandfinancial
supporttoapatientshehadbefriendedinBroadmoorandheldâasisterlyregardâ
towards.138Suchevidencefurtherchallengestheassumptionthatfamiliesonly
soughtthereleaseofrelativeswhocouldcontributetotherunningofthe
household,andhighlightsthestrengthofemotionalbonds.
Strongfamilialbondsalonewouldnotpersuadethesuperintendentto
recommenddischarge.Unlikeatotherasylums,Broadmoorâspatientsâfamilies
couldnotsimplydemandtheirreleaseandexpectapositiveoutcome.139
Petitionsweredeniedbecausefamiliesâhomesorincomesweredeemedunable
toaccommodateorsupportanothermember,140becausefamilymembersdrank
orwereunemployed,orbecausethesuperintendentdoubtedtheycould
superviseandcontrolthepatientiftheyrelapsed.141Thosewithlowlevelsof
agencyâwomen,theelderlyandthepoorânotonlyfelttheeffectofarelativeâs
incarcerationmostkeenlybutwerealsolesslikelytobedeemedableguardians.
136D/H14/D2/2/1/1284/28.Also,D/H14/D2//2/1/714/7.137Forexample,D/H14/D2/2/1/976/39;D/H14/D2/2/1/1085;D/H14/D2/2/1/974/3;D/H14/D2/2/1/366;D/H14/D2/2/1/1076;D/H14/D2/2/1/186;D/H14/D2/2/1/999/15.138D/H14/D2/2/2/107/5-6139Wright,âDischargeâ,p.98.140D/H14/D2/2/1/1738,frompoliceconstabletosuperintendent.141D/H14/D2/2/1/388/11;WilliamOrange,ReportsoftheSuperintendentandChaplainofBroadmoorCriminalLunaticAsylumfortheYear1885(London,1886),p.6.
35
Forsome,arelativeâsreturnhomewasandremained(asfarasthe
recordssuggest)ajoyousoccasion.Asatotherasylums,formerpatientsand
theirfamilieswrotetoBroadmoorâssuperintendentdescribingtheirdelight,
reliefandgratitude,anddetailingtheirsuccessfultransitionbackintosociety.142
Somereunionsdidnotquelltheanguish,fear,sadnessandgriefsomefamily
membersfeltduringtheirrelativeâsinstitutionalization,evenifitwassomething
theyhadlongedfor.Somefounditdifficulttocareforandsupervisetheir
relative,particularlyalongsideworking,maintainingahousehold,orparenting.
Ifrelativeswereamenablepost-release,andiffamilieshadsomefinancial
independence,minordifficulties,includinglossofspacewithinthehome,could
bemanaged.Fivemonthsafterhissisterâsreleaseonemaninformedthe
superintendentthatshewasnolongerâresidingwithusâ.Heandotherrelatives
hadâfurnishedheranicelittlehomeatherownchoiceâŠasitismoreconvenient
forus.â143Butsomefamilieswereunabletocope,particularlyiftheirrelative
becameviolentorintemperate.144Insuchcasesfamilymembershadlittlechoice
buttoinformthesuperintendent,knowingtheirrelativewouldberecommitted.
Suchcases,canthough,indicatestrongemotionalbonds.Despitethehavoctheir
relativeâsrelapseintointemperancewroughtupontheirhomes,MaryAnn
MellorâshusbandâwhosewifehadpawnedtheirbelongingsâandMatthew
CookâssisterâwhohadlentCookmoneyhecouldnotrepayâbothwaitedfour
monthsbeforeinformingthesuperintendent,hopingtheywouldrecoverat
142Forexamplethefollowingletterstosuperintendent,D/H14/D2/2/1/905/33;D/H14/D2/2/366/177;D/H14/D2/2/1/975/2;D/H14/D2/2/2/107/5;D/H14/D2/2/2/100/25;D/H14/D2/2/2/398/41;D/H14/D2/2/2/164/19-20.Smith,âThankfulâ,p.248.143D/H14/D2/2/2174/35.144LucyThompsonâsbrotherrequestedhercommittalaftersheattackedhimandhiswife,D/H14/D2/2/2/105.Similarly,D/H14/D2/2/1/1705.
36
home.145EventhenCookâssisterwrotetothesuperintendentwithâheartfelt
sorrowâ.146Unlikeatordinaryasylumsfamiliesplayednoroleintheirrelativeâs
initialadmissionintoBroadmoor,butlikeatordinaryasylumssomefamilies
decidedto(re)commitonlyafteraprolongedperiodofdistress,whentheycould
nolongermanagetheirrelativeathome.147Thissuggests,asStevenTaylornotes
inhisstudyofchildinsanity,thatfamilieshadâstrongemotionalbondsâwith
theirillrelativesâandwereeagertopreservethese.â148
Examiningpetitioning,dischargeandpost-asylumlife,demonstratesthe
extenttowhichpersistentobservationrenderedfamiliesbothvictimsandquasi-
patientsofasystemdesignedtoconfine,controlandrehabilitatecriminal
lunatics.Foucauldianapproachestothehistoryofpsychiatrypositionasylumsas
instrumentsofsocialcontrol,focusingonthesurveillanceandre-modellingof
patientsintoideal(bourgeois)membersofsociety.149Scholarshavehighlighted
theâlonghistoryofsurveillanceâoutsideoftheinstitution,andthatfamilies
policed,watchedandcontrolledinsanerelativeswithinthehome,sometimes
beforetheirasylumcommittal.150Thispolicingwassupplementedand
encouragedbydoctorsenteringthedomesticsphere,andbyneighbourswhose
curiosityandgossipingledsomefamiliestohidetheirillrelative.151Theroleof
Englishcountyasylums(andthustheState)inpolicingpatientsâfamiliesduring
145D/H14/D2/2/2/146/6-7;D/H14/D2/2/1/1013.146D/H14/D2/2/1/1013.147Historiansagreethatfamiliesâviewedasylumsasalastresort.Forexample,HilaryMarland,âAthomewithpuerperalmania:thedomestictreatmentoftheinsanityofchildbirthinthenineteenthcenturyâ,inBartlettandWright,eds.,Outside,pp.45-65;Suzuki,Madness;Wright,âDischargeâ.148StevenTaylor,ââShewasfrightenedwhilepregnantbyamonkeyatthezooâ:constructingthementally-imperfectchildinnineteenth-centuryEnglandâ,SocialHistoryofMedicine,30(2017),pp.748-766atp.765.149Foucault,History,p.485.150PeterBartlettandDavidWright,âCommunitycareanditsantecedentsâ,inBartlettandWright,eds.,Outside,pp.1-8,13.151Marland,âAthomeâ;Suzuki,Madness.
37
andaftertheirrelativeâsasylumstayisrarelyexamined.Broadmoorextended
thesurveillancetypicallyassociatedwithinsideinstitutionstothefamilyandthe
familyhomebothbeforeandafterpatientsâdischarge.Familiesâactionsand
healthwereobservedtodeterminewhethertheirrelativeshouldbedischarged.
Iftheywere,thepriceofreleasewasacceptingtherolesofactorandsubjectin
continuedsurveillance.Familieshadtopoliceandreporttheirrelativeâs
behaviour,orthepolicewouldenquire.152TheDischargedPrisonerâsAidSociety
watchedsomeformerpatientsandtheirfamiliesandreportedtheirbehaviourto
Broadmoor.153Formerpatientswatchedtheirfamilymembers,too;some
reportedtheirmisdeedstothesuperintendent,particularlyiftheywantedto
moveoutoftheirhome.154Familiesâagencywasthuslimitedbytheirrelativeâs
committalandfurthercurtailedbytheirrelease.Familiesâremainedsupervised
andinlimboaslongastheirrelativelived,andforaslongastheyremained
committedtothemeveniftheywereeventuallydischarged;thiswasnotloston
someoftheirfriends:âIcanâthelpbutwishingthatthepoorfellowmaydie,forit
seemssuchawretchedlifeforthepoorlittlewomantogoonhopingagainst
hope.â155Forfamilymemberswhowishedtoremainincontactwiththeir
relative,anysemblanceofagencywouldonlyreturnupontheirrelativeâsdeath.
V.
TheextensionofthefamilyandfamilialsupportintoBroadmoorlastedoverthe
courseofsomepatientsâlives.Whentheirrelativesweredying,somefamilies
152D/H14/D2/2/1/1705.153D/H14/D2/2/2/105.154D/H14/D2/2/2/105/16.D/H14/D2/2/1/1565155D/H14/D2/2/1/918/7,tosuperintendent.
38
wereshockedandsaddened,especiallyiftheywereunabletovisittheasylum.156
Someappearedfearful,particularlyiftheyhadstrongreligiousfaith.Perhapsin
anefforttosupportthemontheirfinaljourney,suchfamilymembersbeseeched
theirrelativestoatonebeforeitwastoolate.157Aswellasrelyingontangible
supportnetworks,somefoundsolaceintheprospectofanafterlife.Onedying
patientâsbrotheraskedthesuperintendent:
toconveytomybrothermyeverbestandmostaffectionatelovetohim
forhistruehappinessinthisworldtocometobehappyforever&ever
throughourLordandSaviourJesusChristthisismyeverearnestprayer
totheLordJesusonhisbehalfthatifIdonotseehimanymoreinthis
world,thatIdohopetomeethiminheaven,wherepartingwillbeno
more.158
FamiliesâletterstoBroadmoorduringandaftertheirrelativeâsfinal
illnesssuggeststrongfamilialbonds.Thebereavedsometimesexpressedsorrow
andregret,particularlyiftheyhadbeenunabletovisittheirrelativewhilstthey
werealive,andespeciallyiftheyhadbeenabsentattheirdeath.159InVictorian
societywitnessingarelativeâsdeathprovidedasenseofcontroland(itwas
hoped)thecomfortofknowingtheirfinalhourswerepainless.160Family
membersunabletobeattheirdyingrelativeâsside,orthoseinformedofa
suddendeath,soughtcomfort;theyaskedthesuperintendentabouttheirfinal
156Familymemberswereinvitedtovisitandstaywiththeirdyingrelative.RulesfortheguidanceoftheofficersofBroadmoorCriminalLunaticAsylum(London,1863).157D/H14/D2/2/1/973/5,toThornley.158D/H14/D2/2/1/605/5.159D/H14/D2/2/1/739/11,tosuperintendent.160Strange,Death,p.50.
39
days,presumablyseekingreassurancetheywerenotaloneorinpain.161Some
familymembersmighthavebeenindifferenttoarelativeâsdeath,particularlyif
theirrelationshiphadbeenfraught,yetevenwhenrelationshipshadbeen
fractioussorrowstillmaterialized.WhenDodwelldiedin1900hehadnotseen
hisdaughtersorseenorheardfromhispreviouslydutifulsonEdwardformany
years.UntilhisdeathDodwellâsrelationshipwithhisfamilyseemedirreparable,
yethissonHenryâsfinallettertothesuperintendentdescribedhisloveand
sorrow,anddeclared,âIshalleverdeeplyregretmyabsencefromhissideatthe
last.â162PerhapstryingtoconsoleHenry,thesuperintendentrepliedthathewas
theonlypersonDodwellhadwishedtoseebeforehisdeathbuthehadnot
knownwhereatelegrammightreachhimintime.163Manybereavedfamily
members,includingHenry,alsoexpressedrelief;theendofrelativesââpainand
sorrowâwasaâgreatblessingâ.164Giventheemotionalandfinancialburdens
patientsâfamiliescarried,arelativeâsdeathreleasedallinvolved.Familiesno
longerhadtoworryaboutvisitingorwriting,orabouttheirrelativeâshealthor
treatment,andtheywerenolongerpoliced.Itmightalsohaveeasedanyfamilial
tensionoutsideofBroadmoor.
MostpatientswhodiedatBroadmoorwereburiedtherebecauseitcost
familiesnothing.Someregrettedthis.IsobelTaylortoldthesuperintendent:âI
should[have]liked[myaunt]tohavebeenburiedatArmitageBridgeChurch,
butIfinditwillbeexpensiveandIhavemyagedfathertolive[with]mehaving
161D/H14/D2/2/2/183/67;D/H14/D2/2/1/743/6;D/H14/D2/2/1/743;D/H14/D2/2/1/964/15.162D/H14/D2/2/1/936c/216.163D/H14/D2/2/1/936c/217.164D/H14/D2/2/2/178/36;D/H14/D2/2/1/973/9;D/H14/D2/2/1/1075/14;D/H14/D2/2/1/569/12;D/H14/D2/2/2/178/36;D/H14/D2/2/2/1075/14;D/H14/D2/2/2/183/67,alltosuperintendent.
40
onlylatelylostmymother.165LikeotherVictorianwomen,Taylorhadassumed
thedutyofcaringforherelderlyfather;thecostoffulfillingherfilialduty
preventedherdoingasshewishedforheraunt.Manyfamilymembers,including
Taylor,alsoregrettedtheirinabilitytoattendtheirrelativeâsfuneral;thecost
anddistanceremainedtoogreat.166WhileusualVictorianburialsites
ârepresentedalocusforexpressionsofgriefandcommemorationthroughthe
installationofheadstones,giftsofflowers,andvisitstothegraveâ,167
Broadmoorâswascomparativelyaustere.Butempty,unadornedgravesides
representednotalifeunlovedorforgotten,butthehardshipsand
insurmountableresponsibilitiesfacedbytheworkingfamiliesoftheVictorian
criminallyinsane.AlthoughBroadmoorâsburialspaceundoubtedlyreceived
fewermournersthanatypicalVictoriancemetery,somefamilymemberswere
abletovisittogrieveandremember.168Followingarelativeâsfuneralsome
familiescontinuedtodemonstratetheirlove.AnthonyOwstonâssonssent
wreathstobeplaceduponhisgraveeachChristmas,Easterandonthe
anniversaryofhisdeath,prolongingtheiremotionalconnectionwiththeasylum
wheretheirfatherhadspentthemajorityoftheirlives.169
Somefamiliesrejectedaprivateburialbecausetheybelievedthatafter
yearsofincarcerationBroadmoorwastheirrelativeâsrightfulrestingplace.170
OthersseizedtheopportunitytoarrangeafuneralawayfromBroadmoor.
GeorgeThomasPettwas,hiswifetoldthesuperintendent,âlaidtorestwhereI165D/H14/D2/2/2/2/183/67.166D/H14/D2/2/1/400;D/H14/D2/2/2/166/10;D/H14/D2/2/1/740/28;D/H14/D2/2/1/996/29-30;D/H14/D2/2/1/659/12;D/H14/D2/2/1/964/15;D/H14/D2/2/1/996/29-30;D/H14/D2/2/1/760/38,23;D/H14/D2/2/2/178/30.167Strange,Death,p.192.168Somefamilymembersthankedthesuperintendentfortheservice.D/H14/D2/2/1/918/22-23.169D/H14/D2/2/1/963/48-52,tosuperintendent.170D/H14/D2/2/2/178/30,tosuperintendent.
41
knowhelongedtobewithourlittlegirlLillian.â171Dodwellwasburiedin
WokingCemetery,âfarfromthatplacethathassocruellyheldhimforover22
longyearsfromthosethatlovedhimsodearly.â172Afteryearsoftryingand
failingtoliberatetheirlovedone,exercisingthepowertoremovetheirbody
fromBroadmoorwasonewayfamiliesdemonstratedtheirloveandattachment.
Italsomeantthattheycouldfinallyfulfilltheir(oftenyearsâold)promise,
withouttheagreementoftheHomeOfficeandtheasylumâssuperintendent,to
bringtheirrelativehome.
VI.
TheBroadmoorarchiveisarepositoryoflove,sorrow,andhope,alivewith
storiesofloss,poverty,desperationandkinship.Analysisoffamiliesâ
correspondencetotheasylumhasenabledthefirstin-depthexaminationofthe
effectsofasylumcommittalonindividualfamilymembers.Thefindings
demonstratethevalueofconsideringthelives,experiencesandsubjective
identitiesofindividualfamilymembers,focusingontheirwordsandactionsâ
andsometimestheirsilenceâandpayingcloseattentiontofactorsincluding
class,lifestage(andage)and,incasesoflong-termcommittal,changeovertime.
Thisarticledemonstratesthatasylumsaffectedpatientsâfamiliesinmorevaried
andcomplexwaysthanhaspreviouslybeenacknowledged.Weseethefinancial
andemotionaldistresscaused,especiallytowives,howindividualidentities
werechallengedandreconfigured,andthecurtailmentofindividualsâ(often
alreadylimited)agency,notleastbecausetheasylumobservedthem,too.But
171D/H14/D2/2/1/1689.172D/H14/D2/2/1/936c/216,tosuperintendent.
42
kinshipalsoprovedresilient;despitethesedifficultiesfamilymembersstroveto
maintainrelationshipswith,andtocarefor,theirrelativeduringandaftertheir
incarceration.Crucially,weseetheirmotivationswerenotlimitedto,oreven
primarily,financial,butwereshapedbyadesiretopreservefamilialbonds,even
ifincircumscribedform.Evidently,somefamiliestriedandmanagedtogive
meaningtorelationshipsalteredbytheasylum.TheBroadmoorcorrespondence
demonstratesfamiliesâpresencewithintheasylumbutalsohighlightstheneed
formorenuancedreadingsoftheirabsence:itdidnotnecessarilymean
abandonment,butpoverty,love,fearandsadness.
Thesignificanceandresilienceofaffectivefamilybondsforpatientsâ
familymembersfoundhereshowsthattofullyunderstandhowtheimpactsof
committalreverberatedbeyondtheasylumâswallswemustre-evaluateother
collectionsofcorrespondencewithacloserengagementwiththehistoryofthe
family.Doingsowillallowexistingassumptionsaboutthe(mostsignificant)
effectsonfamiliestobereviewed,andwillfurtherilluminatetheeffectsof
asylumcommittalonconceptionsoftheselfandthefamily.Althoughoutsidethe
scopeofthisarticle,comparinghowfamiliesindifferentregionsappearedto
copewithlosingarelativetotheasylummayrevealtheroleregionalsocialand
culturaldifferences,andlocalizedunderstandingsofkinship,playedinfamiliesâ
abilitytowithstandthecommittalofarelative,andshedfurtherlightonthe
historyofthefamily.Historiansmustcontinuetolookbeyondtheasylumâswalls.
Onlywhenweunderstandthebroadersocialimpactsof(long-term,long-
distance)asylumcommittalwillwestarttounderstandthefullextentoftherole
andsignificanceoftheVictorianasylum.