Download pdf - Portfolio - Derek Magee

Derek MageeP: 612.718.3421 E: [email protected] A: Buffalo, MN

DEsigN Portfolio

Derek Magee

2

P: 612.718.3421 E: [email protected] A: Buffalo, MN

3

coNtENts

BEyoND frEEwAysthesis Project at tulane, spring 2012

growiNg locAl NolAwith tulane city center, fall 2012

thE vErticAl strEEtwinning competition Entry, spring 2011

grEENwAy stAircAsEwith tree trust as crew leader, summer 2011

BUs stoP / KiosKwith tulane A-week as team leader, fall 2009

4

10

12

16

17

Downtown transportation Plan, Minneapolis

4

site Plan

Aerial view (opposite)

Possible interventions (opposite)

Derek MageeP: 612.718.3421 E: [email protected] A: Buffalo, MN

BEyoND frEEwAys

During my fifth year of architecture school at Tulane, I spent the fall semester researching urban freeways and in the spring crafted a proposal for possible freeway removal in downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Much of my focus was on researching existing transit plans for Minneapolis and trying to use my proposal as a way to enhance present and future transit networks. The plan on the contents page shows existing freeways terminating when they reach the downtown grid, where mobility can be supported by public transit, bicycles, or walking. The former right-of-way occupied by the freeways would be occupied by a new transit line and new development linking downtown to surrounding neighborhoods.

Zooming in, he plan to the left shows a specific “zone of interchange” between the incoming freeways from the west (394) and north (94), and the proposed transit loop and bike-share stations serving downtown. Essentially the proposal shows an underground transit station in the former right-of-way of an urban freeway, with new mixed-use development happening at-grade. The renderings on the following pages give an idea of the spaces that would be created by this development. Diagrams, sketches, and model photos supplement the other drawings to show my thought process.

Additional images include sample spreads from my final thesis manual, which documents both research and design work, and my final presentation boards, which were the result of the spring semester.

thesis Project at tulane University, spring 2012Advisor: cordula roser-gray

5

Avoid

Mediate

remove

Modify (Add transit)

hide / cap

composite

Derek Magee

6

08 Beyond Freeways: Transitions to a Livable Infrastructure

began to make an appearance in urban centers. In order to see just how drastically our cities have been altered to fit the car, it is only necessary to observe satellite photos of any number of American downtowns. Surface parking and vertical garages dominate even our most ‘dense’ and ‘concentrated’ portions of our cities.

It has become evident that this automobile-first mentality has run its course. While the automobile currently enjoys much of the prime real estate in our cities and takes clear preference over all other forms of mobility, the remainder of urban life has been pushed to the periphery.

During the process of reshaping our infrastructure and its impact on our cities, efforts towards remediation must be as careful as previous interventions were careless. A vision for quality of life in our cities must exist, and any altercations done on our cities should be measured against a common standard for quality. This is not to say that diverse problems require the same solution, but rather a common framework can guide urban design decisions by defining some key attributes that successful cities share.

William H. Whyte reminds us of the most important attibute of the city, to be “spontaneous and pleasant... where people come together.”4 People come to cites to interact with other people, even if they do not know them. And while Whyte states that cities are declining as centers of manufacturing and employment, they remain centers for social and cultural interaction.

Another urban thinker that has investigated many of the attributes that create desirable cities is Jan Gehl, an architect from Copenhagen, Denmark. Gehl champions what he refers to as the “human dimension” in cities, which is simply a call

4. Whyte. p.26

Slow movement allows for greater interaction and life, fast movement allows for very little.

Figure 7

09Derek Magee 2012 Tulane School of Architecture

for places that are walkable and lively.5

A key portion of Gehl’s idea of the human dimension is simply the idea of slowing people down, which puts him squarely at odds with the goals of urban freeways. When people move slower, they come in contact with both the city and other people longer, which reinforces city life. Urban freeways are the antithesis of this, simply trying to move masses of people in and out without interaction.

Gehl also illustrates the concept of “induced demand,” which is the idea that people change their habits to fit availability, whether that is more lanes for cars or more bus routes. This principle applies to many aspects of urban life; it has been observed that buildings more roadways attracts greater numbers of cars. This has led to the conclusion among many planners that it is not possible to build a way out of congestion, and any expansion of road systems only leads to more traffic.

The construction of the interstate system in America is possibly the best example of this, with the rise of the automobile quickly following its construction. Now we enjoy heavy congestion almost everyday in our cities, due to the induced demand of lanes and lanes of high-speed arterials.

Copenhagen has also observed induced demand, but instead of attracting cars, new bikeways are planned to encourage increased ridership. And to a large degree, it has worked, Copenhagen can boast over 35% of commuters traveling by bicycle (while even the most bike-friendly American cities only achieve about 5%).6

So it seems that induced demand works for both desirable and undesirable elements of traffic. Also, it seems that the 5. Gehl. p.48-50 6 CPH Annual Bike Report. p.19

The realities of congestion that many Americans experience everyday is a result of induced demand - if you build it, they will come.

Figure 8

courtyard view

Preliminary Models


thesis Manual spreads


Olympic Sculpture ParkSeattle, WashingtonWeiss / Manfredi Architects2007Figures 14+15

The High LineNew York, New YorkField Operations2009Figures 19+22

Berlin HauptbahnhofBerlin, GermanySchlaich Bergermann and Partners2006Figures 17+18

Nice Ride MinnesotaTwin Cities, MinnesotaAlta Planning2010Figures 13+16

Bo01Malmo, SwedenKlas Tham2001Figures 11+12

Pedestrain Street NetworkCopenhagen, DenmarkGehl Architects1962Figures 20+21

Inspirations

Figure 15

Figure 14

Figure 13

Figure 12 Figure 11

Figure 16


Principles

Enrich the everyday through enhancmentof necessary infrastructure.

Connect positive elements that are currently fragmented.

Reinvent rather than erase and create from a blank slate.

Maximize positive effects though least possible intervention.

Allow for diversity and spontaneity of use to emerge over time.

Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Figure 20

Figure 21

Figure 22


Figure 28

Figure 26

Figure 27

Figure 29

Metro StationsCopenhagen, DenmarkKHR Architects2002

Copenhagen’s award-winning metro system offers an excellent idea into the implementation of simple, efficient, and stylish transit. Key attributes of this system are the simplicity and consistancy of the design, even when applied to a variety of contexts. The metro station is a kit of parts, and while it can be tweaked to fit certain criteria, it largely remains identical when moving from station to station. This contributes to both a easier understanding for passengers and a stronger design conhesiveness that packages the metro identity into a building asthetic.

The simple sectional strategy to bring daylighting down deep underground is another key attibute of these stations, this is both a sustainble strategy to minimize lighting cost and an effort to make platforms more inviting and safe. Underground never feels claustraphobic, especailly with vertical circulation logically and prominently placed.

Also, these stations never disrupt much on the surface, only existing as public stairs leading down and small skylights that appear almost scuptural in public squares. The unobstrusiveness is excellent, every peice exists for a function, and does not distract for any other purpose.

These stations do not have any additional program built into them, but that mostly is possible because of the richness of the context they plug into. It remains to be seen what is possible for Minneapolis.


System MapFigure 26

Station Plan + SectionFigure 27

Escalator Interior ViewFigure 28

Train + PlatformFigure 29

Sectional ModelFigure 30

Station InteriorFigure 31

Figure 31

Figure 30

station view

final Model

Presentation Board (Next) 7

9

Derek Magee

10

facility Plan (office, Demo Kitchen, classroom) Pavilion Plan

campus Master Plan


11

growiNg locAl NolA

This fall, I assisted in the master-planning and schematic design for an urban farm and food education facility as an employee of the Tulane City Center. As part of a two-person design team, I assisted in the design development of both the master plan and the more detailed facility plans shown to the left.

I also was primarily responsible for the bulk of the digital work done for the project, including drafting in AutoCAD and 3D modeling in Rhino. Originally, the project scope included production of a set of construction documents, but that phase has been pushed back to Fall 2013.

with tulane city center and tiffany lin, fall 2012

Pavilion view

Derek Magee

12

Exterior view

Diagrammatic section, Plans (opposite)

concept Diagram (opposite)


Process / concept sketch


13

thE vErticAl strEEt

Two other design students and I entered the Mock Firms International Skyscraper Competition, run by Chicago Architecture Today, while studying in Copenhagen, Denmark. The competition called for a context - driven, commercial highrise for Stockholm, Sweden, and we used our first hand experience of both Scandinavian cities to drive our design proposal.

The basic concept for the building was to take the rich horizontal infrastructure already found in Stockholm, with walking streets and mass transit, and transform it into a vertical expression. We wanted to create a vertical street (Vertigata in Swedish) to infuse public life into the normally insular, pancaked typology of the skyscraper.

Part of our task was to site our project, which gave us the opportunity to research many different areas of Stockholm. We chose the proposed Horthagen development, an eco-district east of downtown that will be home to 40,000 people by 2030. We sited our tower over the future intersection of transit lines (metro, bus, and tram) in order to take advantage of the life this would inject into the base of the tower. We see our proposal as an extension of Stockholm’s rich portfolio of transportation infrastructure, with public space and large “metrovators” bringing street life up into the entire building.

Winning entry, international collegiate DivisionChicago Architecture Today skyscraper competitionwith Kelton Minor and tiffany carlson, spring 2011

Exterior view

concept Diagram (opposite)

Derek Magee

14

infrastructure concept Diagram

site Plan


15

Exterior view

Physical Model Photos


Derek Magee

16

construction view

construction view

construction view

completed view


17

grEENwAy stAircAsE

During my three years of summer employment with Tree Trust, I worked on a variety of landscaping projects around the Minneapolis area. In my final summer, 2011, I led the construction of the timber staircase pictured to the left.

My role in the project was to lead two teams of at-risk youth through the construction process. In addition to this, I was almost fully responsible for the design of the stairs and all technical decision making on-site.

This staircase is located on the Midtown Greenway in South Minneapolis, one of the busiest bike and pedestrian paths in the country, and leads from the below-grade path up 42 steps to the street level above.

with tree trust as crew leader, summer 2011

BUs stoP / KiosK

Each year, the Tulane School of Architecture organizes a community outreach week for students to participate in a fast-paced design build environment. In 2009, we worked with a neighborhood group to create information kiosks, each of which were sited in different places around the neighborhood.

I helped lead a team of students, pictured to the right, in the design and construction of this kiosk, which was incorporated into a bus stop that was needed on a route through the neighborhood. Our team “won” the informal competition for best executed project during the week, judged by both faculty from our school and members of the community.

with tulane A-week as team leader, fall 2009

rear view

front view

team Photo