Mediterra South Community Development District 2300 Glades Road, Suite 410WBoca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone: (561) 571-0010●Fax: (561) 571-0013Toll-free: (877) 276-0889
January 14, 2016
Board of Supervisors
Mediterra South Community Development District
Dear Board Members:
A Regular Meeting of the Mediterra South Community Development District’s Board of Supervisors will
be held on Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 11:00 a.m., at The Club at Mediterra, 15755 Corso
Meditera Circle, Naples, Florida 34110. The agenda is as follows:
1. Call to Order/Roll Call
2. Public Comments [3 minutes per person]
3. Presentation: Preliminary Assessment and Options for Wildfire Reduction
4. Update: Directors and Officers Coverage with Aggregate of $10M
5. Approval of October 21, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes
Action Items
6. Other Business
7. Staff Reports
A. Attorney
B. Engineer
C. Manager
i. Approval of Unaudited Financial Statements as of November 30, 2015
ii. NEXT MEETING DATE: May 18, 2016 at 11:30 A.M.
8. Supervisors’ Requests
9. Adjournment
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 464-7114.
Sincerely,
Chesley E. Adams, Jr.
District Manager
ATTENDEES:
Please identify yourself each
time you speak to facilitate
accurate transcription of
meeting minutes.
FOR RESIDENTS TO ‘LISTEN IN’ TO THE BOARD MEETING
CALL IN NUMBER: 1-888-632-3382
CONFERENCE ID: SOUTH
PROGRAM TITLE: MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING
FOR BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF TO ATTEND BY TELEPHONE:
CALL-IN NUMBER WILL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF MEETING
MINUTES OF MEETING 1
MEDITERRA SOUTH 2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 3
4
A Regular Meeting of the Mediterra South Community Development District’s Board of 5
Supervisors was held on Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 11:00 a.m., at The Club at 6
Mediterra, 15755 Corso Mediterra Circle, Naples, Florida 34110. 7
8
Present and constituting a quorum were: 9 10
Ken Nails Chair 11
Bill Rowe Vice Chair 12
Ken Tarr Assistant Secretary 13
Mike Bishko (via telephone) Assistant Secretary 14
Dallas Luby Assistant Secretary 15
16
Also present were: 17 18
Chuck Adams District Manager 19
Cleo Crismond Assistant Regional Manager 20
Dave Robson District Engineer 21
Jonathan Johnson (via telephone) District Counsel 22
Alyssa Wilson Hopping Green & Sams 23
Greg Pick MCA General Manager 24
Frank Godshall Mediterra North Chair 25
Robert Greenberg Resident & MCA Board Member 26
Linda Bobris Resident 27
Rita Sokol Resident 28
Colleen Kvetko Resident 29
Jerry Kumin Resident 30
Rosi Gaul Resident 31
32
33
FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Call to Order/Roll Call 34 35
Mr. Nails called the meeting to order at 11:10 a.m., and noted, for the record, that 36
Supervisors Nails, Rowe, Tarr and Luby were present, in person. Supervisor Bishko was 37
attending via telephone. 38
39
SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Comments [3 minutes per person] 40
41
Ms. Linda Bobris, a resident, stated: 42
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
2
“Dear Members of the Mediterra CDD Board, 43
There are issues related to the public relations image of the community, 44
the distress caused to members of the community and cruelty to the 45
animals involved. The focus of these remarks regards the issues related to 46
the agreement under discussion as others have addressed the foregoing 47
concerns. 48
Parties to the Contract prior performance: 49
The Mediterra Community Association (MCA) has acknowledged it killed 50
15 deer in violation of the terms of a prior agreement with the CDD 51
Districts. That agreement expired in August of 2014. The CDD District 52
took no action in this regard to stop the unauthorized killing of the deer. 53
Both parties were in violation of their duties. The MCA for not abiding 54
by and managing to it’s authorizations and the CDD Districts for not 55
intervening and ensuring that there was proper oversight, contractual 56
authorization and communication regarding the deer killing activity. This 57
is indicative of a lack of control and inattention to proper contract 58
management. 59
Over-population of deer: 60
The agreement under review refers to deer overpopulation. No evidence 61
exists that this is the case. There is an unwillingness on the part of the 62
MCA to use qualified resources expert in deer management to assess the 63
situation in Mediterra and advise on best practices. These resources have 64
been forwarded to the MCA and CDD without action on their part. The 65
CDD needs to balance their position to include non lethal means of 66
managing deer. This is not a consideration of either the MCA or this 67
agreement. This agreement focuses on culling. 68
The consequences noted in the Recitals such as collision with cars and 69
diseased transmission are moot points. These consequences are either 70
unproven, not present or biased by views of deer management data from 71
outside of Florida. In any event, these risks will exist regardless of the 72
number of deer on CDD property. Even if just 1 Deer. 73
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
3
Third Party Contractor: 74
The CDD Districts cannot absolve themselves of their legislated duties 75
by deferring to the MCA who in turn further defer to a Contractor. That 76
moves control 2 steps from the legislated source. The MCA is a non 77
public body and not organized under the same legal construct or 78
responsibilities as the CDD. Further the contractor the MCA intends to 79
hire to do the culling has no direct responsibility to the CDD. The 80
Rejoinder agreement that is referenced to in this agreement asks that the 81
contractor be bound by this agreement. That deflects responsibility from 82
the MCA to the contractor. The CDD will not know if that contractor 83
agreement was signed with full knowledge by the contractor of the legal 84
and liability taken on. Further the contractor may modify or otherwise 85
disqualify the rejoinder agreement. The CDD Districts will not know if 86
the Rejoinder was signed for convenience, without due diligence by the 87
contractor or under pressure to get the contract work. The Rejoinder 88
deflects responsibility of this agreement to the Contractor. It effectively 89
renders this agreement meaningless. The Contractor is actually 90
executing the deer culling. 91
If a contract such as this is to be executed it should be between the 92
Contractor and the CDD and not deflected to an intervening party like the 93
MCA. 94
Insurance indemnification: 95
There are terms in the contract stating that the parties hold each other 96
harmless for damages and that liability insurance is a requirement. We 97
have already seen that the MCA did not abide by the first agreement and 98
that the CDD did not take correction action or was otherwise aware of the 99
infractions. The CDD has no way of controlling or auditing the actions 100
of the MCA, its’ staff and its’ contractors. The MCA can withhold 101
information and be non-communicative. Such actions would never be 102
transparent. Given that the agreement is a 10 year term there is high risk 103
in such an arrangement. 104
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
4
Despite the insurance and indemnification the CDD is not relieved of its’ 105
responsibilities to be the primary party for deer management. In the event 106
of an insurance claim the carrier will look closely at the control 107
weaknessses in this contract and take action accordingly. 108
If it is determined that the CDD willfully and knowingly put itself in a 109
position where it lacked control and oversight the protection afforded by 110
insurance may not materialize. The same applies to the MCA. This 111
agreement can be construed in such a willful action and thereby deemed 112
reckless. 113
There is no mention of insurance to protect the residents, of Mediterra, 114
their children or pets or other persons present on the Mediterra property 115
who may suffer harm due to the actions of the Contractor. The amount of 116
insurance in the agreement is not adequate to cover such open ended 117
risks. These risks could potentially cause death. Further the Contractor 118
himself is at risk if mistaken for an intruder by a resident. 119
Notice of Hunting: 120
The 24 Hour notice of intent to hunt is not adequate even between the 121
CDD and MCA. The CDD and/or MCA need to inform and remind 122
residents well in advance of hunting to mitigate risk of harm or injury. 123
There is no mention in the contract of providing this information to the 124
residents. This places the liability for damages on the MCA and CDD as 125
they are the parties that enable the hunting to occur. 126
Federal Conservation Law: 127
There are Federal laws related to conservation, protection of endangered 128
species and protection of plants that are missing from this agreement. 129
They apply in addition to the Florida statutes. They need to be referenced, 130
addressed and documented in the agreement. There are potential 131
limitations to what can occur inside a fully enclosed area like Mediterra. 132
Internal Revenue Service and Tax Reporting: 133
The agreement references that there is no employment relationship 134
between the MCA, the CDD Districts and the Contractor. That does not 135
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
5
nor can it legally negate the need to comply with Federal tax laws related 136
to deemed income. Tax accounting and reporting needs to be explicitly 137
called out as a requirement and validated by the CDD for compliance. 138
With respect to taxation, the Contractor derives a taxable benefit by virtue 139
of the value of the deer meat and hides and body parts taken. These have 140
a cash value in kind. The Deer are the assets of the District. They have a 141
value in kind and need to be accounted for as a taxable income to the 142
hunter. This requires filing of the related tax documents and notices of 143
benefit regardless of the employment wording in the agreement. This is 144
Federally mandated and cannot be negated by the terms of employment or 145
lack thereof noted in the agreement. 146
As the Deer belong to the CDD and not the MCA the contractual 147
relationship and tax reporting rests with the CDD and not the MCA. If 148
the CDD does not follow IRS guidance they are in violation of tax laws 149
and so is the Contractor. The MCA’s only responsibility relates to paying 150
the contractor. The tax recording for the payment is handled using 151
relevant tax protocol depending on his status and an incorporated 152
business, LLC or individual. 153
Summary: 154
The agreement under consideration has multiple deficiencies and will 155
expose the CDD, the MCA, the Contractor, Mediterra Residents and 156
third parties to undo risk. It does not take a balanced view of wildlife 157
management. The CDD and MCA appear intent on killing Deer as the 158
ultimate solution. They have been advised on but are not using 159
professional resources to study, manage and protect the Deer and their 160
environment. The CDD and MCA appear to want to rush into this 161
agreement despite the risks, irreversible wildlife eradication and image 162
damage to the community inherent in doing so. 163
This is a bad agreement that appears hastily and poorly architected, 164
without adequate governance or thought and lacking in auditability. It 165
should not be adopted. 166
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
6
I enter my comments on the agreement deficiencies into the public 167
record.” 168
Mr. Jerry Kumin, a resident, stated: 169
“We both have the same goals for Mediterra - to establish us as the 170
premiere community in Naples and the USA. Being designated Audubon 171
sanctioned we cherish wildlife. Most residents bought here to enjoy the 172
plethora and diversity of animals. Where are all our deer? Do you see 173
any? CDD is under FL statute 190 and 190.012 establishes your role to 174
“manage and preserve wildlife”. YOUR DUTY IS PRESERVATION. The 175
MCA responsibility is for homeowner benefits only, has no experience 176
with wildlife and hired a hunter for killing deer prior to a report by a 177
licensed wildlife management expert to report the size and health of the 178
herd and provide advice. How can you assign this responsibility to the 179
MCA when they killed with expired license, has not provided to the CDDs 180
a written report of numbers killed, size documentation with photos, 181
documentation of disposition of venison and carcass. This behavior 182
degrades the value of living in Mediterra. In contradistinction we could 183
be a sample community for wildlife preservation and involve Fla. 184
University wildlife section with student involvement for expert advice. 185
Mediterra would be a model for others. I want to ask each supervisor 186
member why the CDD does not perform the state mandated intent instead 187
of assigning this to the MCA? 188
Have you reviewed all public MCA docs and located the word wildlife? 189
Mr. Kumin reported that Mr. Stephen Wilson reported, at the MCA meeting, that he 190
spoke with a Florida University Professor of Wildlife who offered to evaluate the deer and 191
educate his students on wildlife control. Mr. Kumin requested that each Board Member state 192
why the CDD should not be responsible for the deer. Mr. Nails noted that the Board was not 193
responding to questions, at this time. 194
Ms. Rita Sokol, a resident, read the following statement from Mr. Gary Loser, a resident: 195
“Dear Mediterra CDD Board Members: 196
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
7
I ask that this Board of Supervisors not enter into a License Agreement 197
with the Mediterra Community Association providing the MCA access to 198
CDD lands to hunt deer. That is all the MCA wants to do -- hunt the deer 199
-- not manage it by doing other things in addition to culling. 200
I ask that this Board of Supervisors take responsibility for managing the 201
deer herd itself, instead of delegating this important responsibility to the 202
MCA, which has no expertise in managing a deer herd. 203
This Board can continue to use the Wrathell Hunt firm for District 204
Management and Wrathell Hunt can hire a company engaged in deer 205
management for support as it is needed. Mr. Stephen Wilson of the MCA 206
Board can provide this Board with the names of qualified deer 207
management companies. I believe he proposed an option of working with 208
the University of Florida where a professor will involve students majoring 209
in wildlife management. Involving college students in this will help make 210
Mediterra seem a more desirable community to live in. 211
Many things need to be addressed to maintain a healthy deer herd in 212
Mediterra. Just killing the deer is not the answer. There are additional 213
ways to manage the size of the deer herd and keep it healthy. A deer 214
management company can help do this; the MCA can’t. 215
The Florida Legislature in the CDD statute has essentially said that CDD 216
Boards are the best way to manage the health and size of a deer herd on 217
CDD lands. That is why the statute says (FYI – it is statute 190.012(1)(f)) 218
the CDDs have authority to oversee “conservation areas, mitigation 219
areas, and wildlife habitat, including the maintenance of any…animal 220
species.” 221
I ask you to please not delegate maintenance of our deer herd to the MCA. 222
Instead pass a resolution that Wrathell Hunt and a deer management 223
company will do what’s best for Mediterra. 224
Thank you, Gary Loser” 225
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
8
Ms. Colleen Kvetko, a resident, agreed with the previous opinions and believed it is the 226
CDD’s responsibility to undertake wildlife management. She felt that she is paying for the MCA 227
to kill deer. Ms. Kvetko expressed the following opinions: 228
Residents received no communication from the MCA on their plans to kill 229
Mediterra’s deer. 230
The MCA mentioned that 80 hours was dedicated to this issue but residents spent 231
more than 80 hours of research, which does not make the MCA experts. 232
The MCA must use experts for Whitetail Deer from the University of Florida, 233
Florida Fish and Wildlife (FWC) and The Conservancy to manage and count the 234
herd appropriately. 235
The MCA admitted that their license expired in 2014; therefore, killing the deer 236
was illegal. 237
The MCA is on a mission to kill Mediterra’s deer, yet they do not know how large 238
the herd is and what options are available. 239
The MCA must use the Florida stats on Whitetail Deer. 240
No other community performs deer culling in Lee or Collier County. 241
The MCA does not outline their expectations in the agreement. 242
Ms. Kvetko requested that the Board not execute the agreement until further research was 243
completed. 244
Ms. Kvetko provided a letter from Mr. Angel Ewing, a resident. 245
Ms. Bobris submitted a picture of a boar trap and asked why there was boar trapping. 246
Mr. Adams explained that the MCA requested permission to set traps because boars caused 247
damage. Mr. Nails asked if the Board authorized the traps. Mr. Adams advised Mr. Pick to set 248
the traps a couple of months ago. 249
Mr. Frank Godshall, Chair of Mediterra North CDD Board, noticed three or four deer, 250
last Friday night, at the end of Terrazza, in the large hedge area. He attended the last MCA 251
meeting and heard the controversy but felt that the MCA presentation on deer management was 252
excellent, despite a number of opposing views. Mr. Godshall weighed both sides and believed 253
that the MCA has the right approach. At last week’s Mediterra North CDD meeting, Mr. Robert 254
Greenberg, MCA Board Member, spoke on behalf of the MCA Board, in favor of the agreement 255
and, although residents were not in favor, the Mediterra North CDD Board approved the license 256
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
9
agreement. Mr. Godshall voiced his opinion that the Mediterra South CDD Board will arrive at 257
the same decision, once the pros and cons were weighed. 258
Mr. Robert Greenberg, a resident and MCA Board, who owns a home in Mediterra North 259
and lives in Mediterra South, described several occasions where deer attempted to enter his 260
home. Twice, a family member hit a deer with their vehicle because there was no active deer 261
management program; he was tired of hearing that he acted illegally and all he wanted was to kill 262
deer. 263
Mr. Greenberg provided the following reasons for approving the license agreement: 264
1. Uncontrolled growth in an enclosed limited environment. The herd size is 265
estimated between 120 and 150 and an unchecked herd increases between 266
20 and 40% each year, depending upon the range size, health of the herd 267
and quality of food available. The average annual home range size for 268
open habitats for adult females is approximately one square mile and two-269
and-a-half square miles for yearlings and adult males. The preserve area 270
within both CDDs is 278 acres. 271
2. Natural enemies of deer are non-existent in Mediterra. 272
Regarding residents who moved to Mediterra for the deer, Mr. Greenberg noted that none 273
of the literature for Mediterra shows deer as a selling point. Mediterra was intended to be a high 274
end gated community with a preserve. 275
3. Both CDDs are not staffed or equipped to coordinate a deer management 276
program. Deer move between the two CDDs, they disregard boundaries 277
and do not know human boundaries. Neither CDD have shown an interest 278
in undertaking a deer management program. 279
4. The MCA is the logical administrative and logistical entity whose sole 280
role is to preserve, enhance and maintain the community as a whole, 281
without any single special interest. It is best equipped on a daily and long-282
term basis to implement a proper deer management program. 283
Mr. Greenberg noted that the MCA works with both CDDs and The Club. The Club does 284
not want deer destroying golf course greens. 285
5. Neglecting to undertake sound deer management practices, it will lead to a 286
malnourished diseased herd, increase the likelihood of deer moving to 287
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
10
populated areas in Mediterra, destroy property, increase the risk of vehicle 288
accidents and increase the risk of transmission of airborne diseases. 289
6. The 278 acre west side preserve, which the CDD is legally bound to 290
oversee, will be permanently damaged by too many foraging deer. Each 291
adult deer consumes approximately 3% of their body weight or four 292
pounds of vegetation per day. Severe over-browsing alters plants, species, 293
composition, distribution and abundance and reduces undergrowth 294
diversity, due to the inability of seedlings to re-establish themselves. 295
Their feces will ultimately contaminate CDD water features. 296
7. Degradation of the preserve by over population will endanger other 297
animals that depend on the same habitat, such as fox, rabbit, opossum, 298
armadillo and squirrel. 299
8. While land management practices can influence deer production, the 300
CDDs do not perform any land management practices to influence the 301
deer habitat. 302
9. The most effective and only economical practical method of deer herd 303
management is regulated hunting. Through regulated hunting, an 304
adequate number of animals can be removed from growing herd 305
populations each year. This will keep the deer herd in balance with the 306
habitat and achieve what is known as optimal carrying capacity for a 307
stable and healthy deer population, as well as protect the habitat they live 308
in. 309
10. None of the alternatives to control hunting are workable, cost effective or 310
practical. Doing nothing is simply not a solution. Contraception and 311
sterilization poses the following problems: Cost, logistics, abate 312
distribution, dosage and control, as well as, ingestion of the bait by non-313
target wildlife. Permitting is required by FWC, as well as Lee and Collier 314
counties. There is a time delay, which is unknown and the permitting 315
process may not be successful. Research failed to reveal any such effort 316
anywhere in Florida regarding permitting and implementation. Trap and 317
transfer efforts have proven to be labor intensive and costly, almost $1,000 318
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
11
an animal. In addition, the mortality rates of relocated deer are between 319
50% and 85%. Reintroducing natural predators is not an option, for the 320
obvious reasons. 321
11. Mediterra North approved the agreement. 322
Mr. Greenberg acknowledged that the expired license was an honest mistake, due to an 323
administrative error. The culling was halted when it was brought to the MCA’s attention; the 324
MCA broke the agreement but not the law. 325
Mr. Greenberg proposed the following: 326
Assess the deer population by hiring a deer census company or a wildlife 327
management specialist to perform an accurate census this year. Tomorrow, 328
proposals will be presented to the MCA Board. 329
Perform another census, after the next fawning period, in the spring of 2016, and 330
each year, thereafter. 331
Be open and transparent by reporting to both CDDs and residents and educating 332
residents. 333
No deer hunting until the next hunting season and only by bow and arrow and 334
crossbow. Firearms are prohibited in Mediterra and in Lee and Collier Counties. 335
Mr. Greenberg explained that the goal of deer management is to have a healthy herd, in 336
balance with its habitat that does not interfere with the rights of the community and other uses of 337
the land surrounding the preserve. 338
Mr. Greenberg’s position was fact driven, devoid of emotion; he hoped that residents 339
would assist in crafting a quality deer management program. 340
Mr. Nails asked what happens if a hunter wounds a deer but does not kill it. Mr. 341
Greenberg indicated that the hunter must follow the deer and kill it, preferably with a knife. 342
Mr. Tarr recalled that the MCA started discussing the deer problem several years ago and 343
thanked Mr. Greenberg for his time and effort. In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Adams 344
indicated that Management was never involved in any wildlife species management program and 345
deferred to District Counsel regarding an indemnification provision. 346
Mr. Tarr requested that the MCA maintain insurance through the term of the agreement. 347
Mr. Greenberg will provide insurance certificates and noted that the MCA indemnified both 348
CDDs against property damage and public liability, through the MCA’s insurance provider; 349
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
12
however, the hunter must carry general liability insurance. Mr. Nails noted that the agreement 350
includes a provision for any insurance changes or termination, by either party, upon 30 days 351
written notice. Mr. Greenberg explained that the joinder agreement, attached to the license, 352
requires a hunter to carry insurance. 353
Mr. Tarr asked if the CDD owns the deer. Mr. Greenberg advised that, in the open range, 354
deer do not belong to anyone; however, in a closed range, the state recognized that the owner has 355
the right to control the deer population, provided deer are not hunted without a degradation 356
permit. Mr. Tarr pointed out that, since the CDD does not have enclosed preserves, The Club, 357
MCA and CDDs own the deer. Mr. Greenberg noted that each entity has a claim to the deer. 358
Mr. Tarr surmised that the CDDs own the deer in the closed range. Mr. Greenberg explained 359
that the MCA is the only entity that can overlay all competing interests, such as the CDDs and 360
The Club; the license agreement was simply one more agreement. 361
Mr. Tarr asked about the law for disposal of deer meat. Mr. Greenberg indicated that 362
Florida does not allow the transportation of deer carcasses out of state; it only permits for 363
transportation of the hide. In the past, the hunter was permitted to take deer meat for personal 364
use and proposed that the hunter donate excess meat to a food bank or to the University of 365
Florida. 366
Mr. Tarr asked about the recommended amount of deer, based on CDD acreage. Mr. 367
Greenberg indicated that, based on research, Florida and other southern states are considered 368
“outliers” because of an abundance of vegetation. The number of deer is based on the maximum 369
ecological carrying capacity, meaning, the maximum number supported by a habitat and the 370
optimum carrying capacity. 371
Mr. Nails asked when the first hunt will occur, if the agreement was approved and a deer 372
count was completed. Mr. Greenberg replied next fall. 373
Mr. Luby asked if deer are nocturnal. Mr. Greenberg indicated that deer typically remain 374
in the forest during the day and are frequently out at dusk. 375
Mr. Tarr asked where 15 deer were taken from. Mr. Greenberg did not know. 376
Mr. Bishko was surprised at the extent of Mr. Greenberg’s research and the amount of 377
information compiled and agreed that Mr. Greenberg has the right approach for deer 378
management. 379
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
13
Mr. Bishko voiced concern about deer spreading Lime Disease and a resident’s comment 380
that there was no proof that deer ticks create problems. He believed that many fears are 381
displaced, as culling deer is safe, when a herd is excessive and is supported by the Audubon 382
Society. He favored this agreement and was pleased that Mediterra is taking this approach, 383
through the MCA, which is the best organization to handle it. 384
Consideration of License Agreement By and Between Mediterra North Community 385
Development District, Mediterra South Community Development District, 386
Mediterra Community Association, Inc., for Deer Population Management 387
***This item, previously the Fourth Order of Business, was presented out of order.*** 388
Mr. Adams reported that a revised License Agreement was provided, under separate 389
cover, for the Board’s consideration. Paragraph 5 was adjusted to include the following 390
provision: 391
“C. The MCA shall annually provide the Districts’ representative with 392
copies of all reports and plans related to the deer taking exercises within one 393
week of the adoption or finalization of such reports and plans.” 394
Mr. Adams explained that, as census reports are secured, a plan is formulated for 395
managing the herd and the reports are distributed to the CDDs and posted on each District’s 396
website to address the transparency issue. Mr. Greenberg did not favor posting on the internet, 397
as he was concerned about verbal attacks and noted that the document is considered an MCA 398
document, which is available to any resident. 399
Mr. Bishko asked if the same version of the agreement was approved by the Mediterra 400
North CDD. Mr. Adams replied affirmatively. Mr. Bishko referred to the second “Whereas” 401
and noted that residents were not only receiving benefit but the entire county was, also. 402
Regarding Paragraph 7B, Mr. Bishko pointed out that language was not included to 403
require the MCA to provide copies of renewal notices to both Districts. Mr. Adams indicated 404
that the Districts will receive the initial Certificate of Insurance (COI) and a requirement will be 405
included on the COI to provide 30-day notice of non-renewal or termination. 406
Mr. Tarr noted that the agreement says that the CDDs and MCA want to control 407
overpopulation but overpopulation has not been determined. Mr. Greenberg clarified that the 408
purpose is to prevent overpopulation but voiced his opinion that there is overpopulation; 409
therefore, the agreement should remain, as written. Mr. Bishko agreed, as it was not substantive. 410
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
14
Mr. Johnson advised that the agreement sets out principles but the key parts of the agreement 411
start on Page 2, after the “Now, THEREFORE” language. 412
413
On MOTION by Mr. Bishko and seconded by Mr. Luby, with 414
all in favor, the License Agreement By and Between Mediterra 415
North Community Development District, Mediterra South 416
Community Development District, Mediterra Community 417
Association, Inc., for Deer Population Management, as 418
amended, with the MCA providing their reports and plans, 419
was approved. 420
421
422
THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Consideration of Award of Contract: 423
Lake & Wetland Maintenance 424 425
Ms. Crismond reviewed the memorandum regarding the RFP for lake and wetland 426
maintenance and noted that three contractors submitted proposals. The proposal submitted by 427
the current contractor, LakeMasters Aquatic Weed Control, Inc. (LakeMasters), was 19% above 428
the current contract, due to high chemical and labor costs. There is a higher level in service, due 429
to the manual removal of weeds from littoral shelves, which causes much less damage. 430
In response to Mr. Nails’ question, Ms. Crismond indicated that the Mediterra North 431
CDD Board selected LakeMasters, subject to LakeMasters coming before the Board next year, 432
prior to the Board approving the second year option of the contract. 433
Mr. Tarr recalled that, at a prior meeting, the Board discussed removal of canna lilies on 434
22 lakes, at a cost of $20,000. Mr. Adams noted that the actual cost was approximately $35,000 435
to $39,000, under separate agreement, as this was a one-time event that was not included in the 436
contract. Ms. Crismond requested an updated proposal from LakeMasters, as the prior proposal 437
was submitted several months ago and this exercise was imminent. Mr. Adams recalled that the 438
Board approved the canna lily removal for budget purposes. A Board Member expressed 439
concern about LakeMasters not honoring their price. Mr. Adams explained that, this summer, 440
the canna lilies and all aquatic plants blossomed and he did not want to hold LakeMasters 441
accountable to an estimate submitted in January, as there was a great deal of activity in the lake 442
bank population. Mr. Adams wanted an actual cost, based on positive results, attributable to 443
management of infestations within the littoral plants, using a chemical that killed non-beneficial 444
plants and stunted the growth of the beneficial plants, particularly new seedlings. 445
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
15
Mr. Adams recalled that, for two contract cycles in a row, LakeMasters was approved, 446
contingent upon negotiating a price between the lowest bidder and LakeMasters. He pointed out 447
that the Board was comfortable with LakeMasters but mandated that LakeMasters take a more 448
labor intensive approach to protect beneficial plants. 449
Based on increases in labor and insurance costs, Mr. Adams recommended LakeMasters, 450
as their proposal was in line with the current level of service, which is the level of service 451
preferred by the community. 452
In response to a question, Ms. Crismond indicated that LakeMasters’ performance was 453
better than in prior years and their response time is immediate. 454
Mr. Nails asked why the Mediterra North CDD only approved one year. Mr. Adams 455
explained that there is a statutory limit, on an annual basis. The recommendation is for one year 456
but the Board can measure LakeMasters’ performance and decide whether to proceed with year 457
two. In August, 2016, a proposal for the second year will be provided, along with a Lake Audit 458
and pictures; if the Board decides to go out for bid, Staff will commence the RFP process and 459
provide proposals at the October, 2016 meeting. 460
Mr. Nails recalled that, two years ago, Staff negotiated and LakeMasters decreased their 461
price by 10%. Mr. Adams recalled a reduction of 6% or 7%. Mr. Adams confirmed Mr. Nails’ 462
comment that LakeMasters is losing good people to the construction industry. 463
In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Luby indicated that he received one resident 464
complaint regarding spikerush. Mr. Adams reported an algae blow up in Serata and on the east 465
side, due to the aggressiveness of the removal program. Mr. Tarr asked if it is time for spikerush 466
cutting. Mr. Adams advised that the spikerush reduction program commenced last spring, on the 467
east and west sides of Livingston. The contract now requires spikerush to be sprayed back. 468
469
On MOTION by Mr. Tarr and seconded by Mr. Rowe, with all 470
in favor, the LakeMasters proposal for lake and wetland 471
maintenance services, in a not-to-exceed amount of $151,140, 472
and addressing the second year option in August, 2016, were 473
approved. 474
475
476
477
478
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
16
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Consideration of License Agreement By 479
and Between Mediterra North 480
Community Development District, 481
Mediterra South Community 482
Development District, Mediterra 483
Community Association, Inc. for Deer 484
Population Management 485
486
This item was discussed after the Second Order of Business. 487
488
FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Consideration of Resolution 2016-1, 489
Amending and Restating Resolution 99-490
11, Setting Forth a New Policy of the 491
Mediterra South Community 492
Development District Board of 493
Supervisors With Regard to the Support 494
and Legal Defense of the Board of 495
Supervisors, District Officers, and 496
District Manager and Providing for an 497
Effective Date 498
499
Mr. Nails presented Resolution 2016-1 for the Board’s consideration. This resolution 500
was an amendment to the resolution adopted in 1999. Redlined and final versions were 501
provided. 502
Ms. Wilson explained that Resolution 2016-1 revises the existing policy to provide the 503
following: 504
Updates the Board’s indemnity policy to provide procedures that must be 505
followed to ensure the provision of legal representation for the Board, District 506
officers and District Manager, in accordance with Sections 111.07 and 768.28, 507
Florida Statutes, providing for the defense of any and all civil actions, with the 508
exception of certain cases in which the Board, District officers or the District 509
Manager acted in bad faith, with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting 510
wanton and willful disregard of human rights. 511
Provides for the Board, District officers and District Manager to use an attorney 512
appointed by the Board or an attorney of their choosing and submit bills for 513
reimbursement. 514
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
17
Mr. Tarr asked about paying a retainer, if a Board Member chooses their own attorney. 515
Mr. Adams indicated that it is standard business practice to pay a retainer. Mr. Johnson advised 516
that, to the extent a Supervisor goes outside the scope of their authority or acts in bad faith, with 517
malicious purpose or disregard to human rights, the Supervisor must reimburse the District for 518
funds expended; otherwise, the District will have a claim against the Supervisor for failure to 519
pay. Mr. Tarr questioned if Mr. Johnson had any such cases. Mr. Johnson replied affirmatively. 520
In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Johnson estimated costs of $20,000 in legal fees, 521
depending on the nature of the case. Adopting the resolution does not form the basis of the 522
Board’s obligation to indemnify the Board Member. 523
Referring to Page 3, Paragraph 7, Mr. Tarr pointed out that the resolution states, 524
“determinations shall be made by a unanimous decision of the District’s Board of Supervisors”, 525
which is dissimilar because the Board votes by a majority. Mr. Johnson concurred, noting that 526
this is not a legal requirement and minority Board Members can vote to deny the indemnity of a 527
Board Member. 528
Mr. Johnson explained that this provides a “safety net” for all Supervisors who perform 529
in the manner that is in the best interest of the community, without concern that they may be 530
denied the right to have the best line of defense. 531
532
On MOTION by Mr. Rowe and seconded by Mr. Luby, with 533
all in favor, Resolution 2016-1, Amending and Restating 534
Resolution 99-11, Setting Forth a New Policy of the Mediterra 535
North Community Development District Board of Supervisors 536
With Regard to the Support and Legal Defense of the Board of 537
Supervisors, District Officers, and District Manager and 538
Providing for an Effective Date, was adopted. 539
540
541
SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of September 2, 2015 Public 542
Hearing and Regular Meeting Minutes 543 544
Mr. Nails presented the September 2, 2015 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting Minutes 545
and asked for any additions, deletions or corrections. 546
The following change was made: 547
Line 48: Change “Row” to “Rowe” 548
549
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
18
On MOTION by Mr. Luby and seconded by Mr. Rowe, with 550
all in favor, the September 2, 2015 Public Hearing and Regular 551
Meeting Minutes, as amended, were approved. 552
553
554
Action Items 555
This item was not discussed. 556
557
SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Other Business 558
559
Mr. Nails referred to a picture showing someone cutting the preserve. 560
Mr. Adams received an email from MCA Manager, Mr. Greg Pick, requesting permission 561
to trap wild boar. There is no season for wild boar; they breed constantly and cause excessive 562
property damage. In response to Mr. Nails’ question, Mr. Pick indicated that the enclosures are 563
on Castellano Way. Mr. Adams noted that Castellano Way is in Mediterra North but boar cross 564
boundary lines like deer. Mr. Nails asked if Staff recommended setting traps on Mediterra South 565
property. Mr. Adams confirmed that this is a localized issue. Mr. Pick pointed out that the only 566
boar issue was on the north side, where the golf course was damaged; the landscaping crew 567
foreman noted that several areas of landscaping were damaged by boar. Mr. Adams suggested 568
an ongoing management program. Mr. Rowe asked about a contract with the MCA for boar 569
management. Mr. Adams recommended MCA hiring a boar trapper. 570
Ms. Bobris noticed many beer cans and expressed concern about hunters consuming 571
alcohol in the community. 572
In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Pick indicated that one trap was set but no boars 573
were caught. 574
Ms. Bobris voiced concern about boar trapping becoming a public relations nightmare. 575
Mr. Adams was not concerned, as boar management programs are established all over south 576
Florida. Ms. Bobris pointed out that there was no transparency, as residents were not informed 577
by the MCA or CDDs. Mr. Nails concurred; the Mediterra South Board was not aware of this 578
issue because it occurred in Mediterra North and requested that, in the future, the Board be 579
apprised. 580
Mr. Nails asked what happens with the trapped boar. Mr. Adams indicated that the boar 581
are moved off site and harvested. Mr. Nails preferred an agreement requiring the hunter to carry 582
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
19
insurance. Mr. Adams agreed, wondered if the landscaper’s insurance carrier would cover the 583
landscaper’s deer hunting services and suggested acknowledgement from the carrier. 584
Mr. Adams will coordinate with Staff on an agreement, including insurance coverage, 585
indemnification language and trash removal and provide the agreement at the January meeting. 586
Mr. Nails recommended taking action if there was boar damage on the Collier County 587
side. In order to take action, immediately, Mr. Adams suggested authorizing Staff to prepare an 588
agreement, the Chair to review and execute the agreement with the Board ratifying the 589
agreement at the January meeting. 590
The Board agreed. 591
592
EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Staff Reports 593
594
A. Attorney 595
There being no report, the next item followed. 596
B. Engineer 597
There being nothing additional to report, the next item followed. 598
C. Manager 599
Discussion: Florida CDD Financial Regulatory Due Dates 600
***This item was an addition to the agenda.*** 601
Mr. Adams provided an updated Financial Regulatory Report, at the request of Mr. 602
Bishko. The table was rephrased to say “key activity dates” and included regulatory reporting 603
dates, as well as standard operating programs within the community, starting on October 1, 2015 604
and ending September 30, 2016. In the second column, items designated with standard operating 605
policy (SOP) are indicators of key programs, such as: 606
Canna lily cut back 607
Lake bank erosion abatement program 608
Interconnecting drainpipe inspection and cleanout 609
Lake Audit Report 610
Mr. Adams will email an updated Financial Regulatory Report to Mr. Bishko. 611
Mr. Tarr requested a column for insurance expiration dates. Mr. Adams will add the 612
column but pointed out that insurance is renewed, each year, on October 1. 613
Discussion: Crime Policy 614
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
20
***This item was an addition to the agenda.*** 615
Mr. Adams reported that the crime policy limit could not be increased to $2 million, as 616
the carrier will only cover up to $1 million. At Mr. Tarr’s suggestion, Mr. Adams recommended 617
revising the Rules of Procedure, so the provision is accurate. Mr. Adams pointed out that two 618
advertisements are required for the rule change process; a notice of intent of the rule change and 619
the Public Hearing, which can be advertised for the January meeting. 620
Mr. Tarr wondered why the carrier will not increase the coverage from $1 million to $2 621
million, since Wrathell, Hunt & Associates, LLC (WHA) is a reputable company. Mr. Nails 622
wanted a higher limit and suggested seeking a different insurance carrier or pushing the current 623
insurance company to seek secondary markets. Mr. Adams will speak to the insurance company. 624
In response to Mr. Nails’ question, Mr. Adams indicated that the aggregate for the 625
director and officer’s (D&O) insurance cannot be doubled and is not available at an additional 626
cost. Mr. Luby suggested increasing the coverage from $5 million to $10 million. Mr. Adams 627
recalled that the Board was comfortable with the per occurrence amount of $5 million. 628
Mr. Adams will obtain pricing for D&O coverage proposals from insurance carriers who 629
will reinsure WHA for $2 million in crime coverage and provide them at the January meeting. 630
Mr. Bishko recalled that the Interlocal Agreement was supposed to be revised to include 631
a provision on mediation. Mr. Adams confirmed that the modified language was included in the 632
agreement, upon signature. Mr. Adams will distribute the final agreement to the Board. 633
i. Approval of Unaudited Financial Statements as of August 31, 2015 634
Mr. Adams presented the Unaudited Financial Statements as of August 31, 2015. 635
636
On MOTION by Mr. Luby and seconded by Mr. Rowe, with 637
all in favor, the Unaudited Financial Statements as of August 638
31, 2015, were approved. 639
640 641
Mr. Tarr questioned the amount of the final payment from The Club for the mediation 642
work. Mr. Adams indicated that an invoice for $22,000 was sent to the South MCA for the 643
restoration and baseline work. Additionally, the District has not received the Consent Order 644
(CO) from SFWMD, even though the settlement was signed three months ago. Mr. Adams 645
surmised that this may be because: 646
A comfort level with the Districts in self reporting 647
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
21
District’s moving rapidly through the preparation and implementation of a 648
restoration plan 649
Recent significant up tick to SFWMD workload 650
In response to a question, Mr. Adams confirmed that the MCA paid the District in 651
September. 652
Ms. Crismond reported that EarthBalance completed several littoral plantings of orange 653
and red canna lily. In a few months, Blue Flag Iris will be planted, which is a winter plant. 654
At Mr. Nails’ request, Ms. Crismond will email a list of lakes. 655
Ms. Crismond reported that the golf course lake bank erosion repairs were delayed 656
because of high water levels. Mr. Tim Hiers, the new golf course Superintendant, will 657
commence with the lake bank repair project, as soon as the water recedes. 658
659
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisors’ Requests 660
661
Mr. Tarr spoke to Mr. Wrathell, several months ago, about what CDDs do to reduce the 662
risk of fires in preserves and how to extinguish fires, as the Fire Department must cross the golf 663
course to reach the preserves. He pondered whether Staff should look into ways to help mitigate 664
the chance of fires in the preserves, such as controlled burns. 665
Mr. Adams explained that a controlled burn, which is performed in coordination with the 666
Fire Department and the Division of Forestry, is the most feasible way to reduce the risk of fire 667
in preserve areas. In Treviso Bay, they prepared a Prescribed Burn Plan and waited for the 668
optimal weather condition, based on the wind direction and humidity level. Mr. Adams did not 669
foresee a controlled burn for Mediterra, due to the placement of houses. Mr. Tarr was interested 670
in having an expert on this subject speak to the Board. 671
Mr. Robson reported that his Environmental Department participated in controlled burns 672
and agreed with Mr. Adams that, due to the proximity of homes to the preserve areas, a 673
prescribed burn for Mediterra is not advised. Mr. Robson explained that a controlled burn cleans 674
out excess vegetation. The District Engineer’s Ecologist will look at the layout of Mediterra and 675
discuss what is feasible at the January meeting. 676
Mr. Bishko asked that meeting materials be distributed to the Board ten days prior to each 677
meeting. Mr. Adams indicated that ten days was never the process; seven days prior was 678
standard. 679
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
22
Mr. Bishko requested draft minutes within 30 days of meetings, as the last set of minutes 680
were distributed late. Mr. Adams confirmed that the draft minutes, in final draft form, were 681
provided on time; the last meeting was September 2, 2015 and the draft minutes were available 682
October 1 or 2. 683
In response to Mr. Bishko’s question, Mr. Adams explained that the call-in information 684
for Board Members and Staff is not provided on each agenda because the agenda is posted on the 685
website and, if included, the public could call in to the interactive call in line. The agenda lists 686
the “listen in” number for residents. Mr. Bishko requested that the call-in information be 687
provided, by email, 24-hours prior to the meeting. 688
Mr. Adams reported that the January meeting is scheduled for January 20, 2016 at 11:00 689
a.m. and noted that the next meeting date will be included on each agenda. 690
Public Comments [3 minutes per person] 691
Public comments resumed. 692
Mr. Kumin reported that he is an Intro-medicine Specialist and research on Lime Disease 693
showed that almost all deer have ticks and the lime organism is part of the tick population. In 694
Whitetail Deer in Florida, it is rare to find a tick with the lime organism but it is not rare in the 695
north. 696
Mr. Bishko disagreed; statistics that he provided Mr. Greenberg showed that Florida had 697
71 confirmed cases of Lime Disease, which is far less than Connecticut, New Jersey or 698
Pennsylvania. 699
Ms. Bobris reported that, according to a study performed by the University of Florida, 700
one documented case of Lime Disease was in northern Florida. 701
Ms. Linda Bobris stated: 702
“What you have now is a (PR) public relations nightmare that will 703
perpetuate itself over the next 10 years. The unauthorized killing of deer was bad 704
enough but the lack of transparency is not excusable. There is no transparency. 705
Residents have always found out after the fact and only by their own 706
investigation. The rules of open government under statute 190 of Florida Law 707
makes all that you say and do a public record. Your secretive behavior and deeds 708
are now part of public record and available for all to hear and read. 709
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
23
You need to be pro-active and educate yourself and your audience as to 710
what the consequences of your actions are on the Mediterra Community. 711
At the last MCA and North CDD meetings it was suggested we take a step 712
back…form a subcommittee under one of the board members to look at the deer 713
issue. Stephen Wilson of London Bay Development had consulted with The 714
University of Florida, Department of Wildlife Ecology to use students from its 715
program to do headcounts, put up cameras to study and learn what we have to do 716
to take care of deer rather than just kill them. May I take this opportunity to 717
publicly thank and recognize this developer who has the best interests of 718
Mediterra at heart. 719
This is our opportunity to enhance and differentiate ourselves from other 720
communities. We must engage other groups such as the Audubon Society, The 721
Conservancy, Florida Fish and Wildlife together with the help of University of 722
Florida who were willing to commit their environmental study to students to this 723
project. This will transfer our image to one of a committed and caring 724
community. We have unique opportunity to use wildlife management to educate 725
and inform not only ourselves but also the public. 726
We could use both the CDD meetings and MCA meetings as a forum for 727
the study of wildlife and the preserves. We could add this to our activity 728
calendar: during season you could bring your guests and grandchildren to 729
lectures by the Audubon, Conservancy, Florida Fish and Wildlife and University 730
of Florida. You can elevate the image of Mediterra to one that cares and studies 731
the habitat of Southwest Florida. 2.7 billion dollars is spent by vacationers to 732
view Florida’s unique habitat and animals. Let us be a leader amongst 733
communities…and rise to the occasion to differentiate ourselves. Many of us 734
bought our homes to live with nature and raise our families in Mediterra’s unique 735
natural habitat. Let us take this opportunity to look forward and use the lands 736
and creatures that we are blessed to live with and which you are mandated to 737
protect. Elevate Mediterra to a community that educates and cares about living 738
with all that nature has provided. 739
The CDD board cannot and must not abdicate its responsibility. 740
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
24
As the Conservancy of Southwest Florida states it is our water, our land, 741
our wildlife, our future. Remember, the welfare of our deer is the welfare of 742
Mediterra. 743
Thank you for listening. Linda Bobris” 744
Mr. Tarr noted that the Board respects everything that Ms. Bobris accomplished but the 745
Board has never been secretive; residents are allowed to call into meetings and the meeting time 746
was changed to earlier in the day, so residents could attend. Mr. Adams, Ms. Crismond and the 747
Board are available. A nature trail through the preserve was discussed and Mr. Hiers has a 748
proposed plan and study. An election will be held next year for open seats and Mr. Tarr 749
encouraged Ms. Bobris to run for a seat and become an active part of the community. Mr. Tarr 750
hoped that the community can move forward in a positive way. 751
Mr. Nails pointed out that the Board is a public body and Board Members cannot speak 752
to one another, outside of a public meeting, about issues; everything is discussed at meetings and 753
all documents are facilitated through Mr. Adams for dissemination to the Board. All documents 754
become a public record. Mr. Nails thanked Ms. Bobris for her presentations. 755
Mr. Adams directed Ms. Bobris to the District’s website. Mr. Tarr pointed out that the 756
website has incorrect officer positions, as he is still listed as Vice Chair. 757
In response to Mr. Bishko’s question, Mr. Rowe reported that, this year, approximately 758
65” of rain was received through yesterday; at this time last year, 49” was received. He 759
reviewed the annual number of inches of rain received over the past five years. 760
761
TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment 762
763
There being nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned. 764
765
On MOTION by Mr. Luby and seconded by Mr. Rowe, with 766
all in favor, the meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m. 767
768
769
770
771
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 772
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
25
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
____________________________ ____________________________ 781
Secretary/Assistant Secretary Chair/Vice Chair 782
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
1
ACTION ITEMS
1. 10/21/15 ACTION/AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Adams will work with Staff on a boar
management agreement, including insurance coverage, indemnification
language and provide at the January meeting for ratification. STATUS:
ONGOING
2. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will email the updated Financial
Regulatory Report to Mr. Bishko. STATUS: ONGOING
3. 10/21/15 ACTION/AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Adams will secure D&O coverage
with an aggregate of $10 million. STATUS: ONGOING
4. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will distribute the final Interlocal
Agreement to the Board. STATUS: ONGOING
5. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Crismond will email a list of the lakes receiving
littoral plantings to the Board. STATUS: ONGOING
6. 10/21/15 ACTION/AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Robson will have his Ecologist look
at the layout of Mediterra and discuss with the Board options for reduction
of wildfire fuel within the CDD preserves, at the January meeting.
STATUS: ONGOING
7. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will provide meeting materials to the
Board seven days prior to each meeting and draft minutes within 30 days
of meetings. STATUS: ONGOING
8. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will provide call-in information by email
24-hours prior to meetings. STATUS: ONGOING
9. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will include the next meeting date on
each agenda. STATUS: ONGOING
10. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Crismond met with Mr. Tim Hiers, the new golf
course Superintendant, and provided him with the golf course lake bank
areas that require repairs; she will follow up with Mr. Hiers regarding the
status of the repairs. STATUS: ONGOING
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
2
COMPLETED ITEMS
1. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to forward copies of the April, 2013
dissemination report to the Board. STATUS: COMPLETED
2. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Crismond will contact the residents with erosion
issues that must be addressed. STATUS: COMPLETED
3. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Bishko requested that proposals for different plants
that would better solve the erosion problem be presented. Mr. Adams
recalled discussion about installing Bacopa and photographs of the plant
will be provided at the January meeting. STATUS: COMPLETED
4. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Johnson to add a specific reference to the statutory
and rule provisions of the Commission on Ethics, F.S. 112.3143, as
discussed, to the Rules of Procedure to Section 2, Paragraph 6, of the
Rules of Procedure. STATUS: COMPLETED
5. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to attach Mr. Tarr’s documents regarding
Mr. Tarr’s opinion of the memorandum that was issued against him.
STATUS: COMPLETED
6. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Staff will continue monitoring the lake maintenance
conditions and notify the Board of any findings. STATUS: ONGOING
7. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will prepare a statement regarding aeration
activities and ask the MCA to e-blast it to the community. At the Board’s
suggestion, Mr. Adams will prepare a CDD communication to the
community reporting on various items. STATUS: COMPLETED
8. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Johnson to provide Mr. Adams with the entire
chain of information between himself and Mr. Tarr, regarding Board
membership in Club and potential conflicts of interest for Board Members,
dissemination to the Board. STATUS: COMPLETED
9. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Regarding establishing a protocol, if Board Members
continue engaging the District Engineer and District Counsel, individually,
Mr. Adams indicated that he will include this as a discussion item on the
next agenda. STATUS: COMPLETED
10. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to verify whether the MCA performed deer
reduction activities. STATUS: COMPLETED
11. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will prepare a “Do’s and Don’t’s in the
Preserves” for inclusion in the newsletter. STATUS: COMPLETED
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
3
COMPLETED ITEMS
12. 05/21/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to draft procedure for reporting violations
to Collier County. STATUS: COMPLETED
13. 05/21/14 ACTION ITEM: District Counsel to amend disclosure agreement, per
discussion at May 21, meeting. STATUS: COMPLETED
14. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to provide Mr. Tarr with a copy of the
insurance policy. STATUS: COMPLETED
15. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: The Reporting of Incidents of Potential Violations
procedure to be adopted by resolution, as modified, at the October
meeting, in order to memorialize the procedure. STATUS:
COMPLETED
16. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to follow up with the MCA to delete the
CDD literature from their website and replace it with a link to the CDD’s
website. STATUS: COMPLETED
17. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to circulate the agreement for lake bank
maintenance, include it in the newsletter and post the newsletter on the
CDD website. STATUS: COMPLETED
18. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Robson to obtain a proposal for Lake #68 to
determine the current depth and compare the current depth to the designed
depth. Ms. Crismond to report the findings to Ms. Lass and the Board.
STATUS: COMPLETED
19. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: District Manager to draft a policy for engagement of
District Counsel and District Engineer, by Board Members, with requests
being made through Management, and dissemination to all Board
Members. STATUS: COMPLETED
20. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to include information discussed by Mr.
Tarr, regarding inspection report and letter from Mr. Radford, as an
attachment to the minutes in which the original report was provided. Per
Mr. Tarr’s request, Ms. Crismond to insert a date on the document.
STATUS: COMPLETED
21. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Regarding the acreage listed in the recent newsletter,
Mr. Adams to adjust the verbiage to state “The District’s jurisdictional
boundaries encompass __” followed by a description of the properties and
facilities that the Districts own, including the lakes and wetlands.
STATUS: COMPLETED
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
4
COMPLETED ITEMS
22. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Management to review trust indenture regarding
arbitrage rebate calculations to ensure there are no specific requirements.
Once the requirement is determined, each year, during budget
deliberations, a recommendation may be made to budget for a report.
STATUS: COMPLETED
23. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Johnson to prepare an interlocal agreement for the
next meeting. STATUS: COMPLETED
24. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Staff to follow up with M.R.I. regarding inspection of
the five main outfall pipes. STATUS: COMPLETED
25. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Staff to provide a “laddered” approach proposal for
additional Directors and Officers (D&O) liability insurance coverage,
between $1 million and $5 million, for the August meeting. STATUS:
COMPLETED
26. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to follow up with Ms. Carlson regarding a
fee reduction and ask if she will be reappointed to the SFWMD sub board.
STATUS: COMPLETED
27. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Management to implement conservation area
restoration plan. STATUS: COMPLETED
28. 09/02/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding the Lake & Wetland Audit comment “All
Audit Check Points answered “No” require Additional
Comments/Information” Mr. Bishko requested that the question “Is there a
CDD or Club owned Aerator/Fountain present?” be reworded as the
answer would always be “No”, if the lake did not have aerators or a
fountain. STATUS: COMPLETED
29. 09/02/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding General Liability Insurance coverage limits,
Mr. Luby wanted to know if the aggregate could be changed and the cost
for coverage with the aggregate amount double the occurrence amount.
Mr. Adams will consult with the insurance agent regarding the premium
cost to change the aggregate amount. STATUS: COMPLETED
30. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Greenberg will provide insurance certificates
through the term of the License Agreement. STATUS: COMPLETED
31. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will revise the officer positions on the
website. STATUS: COMPLETED
MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015
5
COMPLETED ITEMS
32. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding increasing Management’s crime policy from
$1 million to $2 million by the October 1, 2015 renewal date, Mr.
Wrathell will confirm with his insurance carrier; if the Board hears
nothing additional, it can assume that Management obtained the requested
$2 million coverage. STATUS: COMPLETED
33. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding the Florida CDD Financial Regulatory Due
Dates chart, Mr. Bishko wanted a column added identifying the actual or
approximate due dates, with the chart in chronological order for the
District’s fiscal year. Mr. Bishko also requested a similar chart containing
the operational due dates and/or when items are completed or performed,
such as the lake and lake maintenance audits, planting, draft minutes;
items dealing with nonfinancial items. Mr. Adams will prepare those
charts. STATUS: COMPLETED
34. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Prior to the next meeting, Resolution 2015-09 to be
modified by District Counsel, as requested, adding verbiage to other
portions of the resolution to include the District Manager. At the next
meeting, Ms. Cameron will provide the redline version to compare
Resolution 1999-11 with Resolution 2015-09. STATUS: COMPLETED
35. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Going forward, draft minutes, in final draft form, will
be emailed to the Board, automatically. STATUS: COMPLETED
MEDITERRA NORTH & MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2015UNAUDITED
1
GeneralDebt
ServiceASSETS Cash 485,757$ -$ 485,757$ Investments
Federated 102,951 - 102,951 BB&T - cdars 100,782 - 100,782 Revenue A - 118,068 118,068 Reserve A - 885,028 885,028 Prepayment A - 2,216 2,216
Due from other governmentsMediterra North
Debt service - 2012 209 - 209 Mediterra South
General fund 5,417 - 5,417 Debt service - series 1999 48 - 48 Debt service - series 2001 22 - 22 Debt service - series 2003 3,507 - 3,507 Debt service - series 2012 9,166 - 9,166
Due from other fundsMediterra North
General fund - 99,863 99,863 Mediterra South
General fund - 171,015 171,015 Due from clearing fund 1,030 - 1,030
Total assets 708,889$ 1,276,190$ 1,985,079$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESLiabilitiesAccounts payable -$ 9,166$ 9,166$ Due to other governments
Mediterra NorthGeneral fund 5,417 3,577 8,994
Mediterra SouthGeneral fund - 209 209
Due to other fundsMediterra North
Debt service - series 2012 99,863 - 99,863 Mediterra South
Debt service - series 2012 110,248 - 110,248 Debt service - series 2013 60,767 - 60,767
Total liabilities 276,295 12,952 289,247
Fund BalancesRestricted for:
Debt service - 1,263,238 1,263,238 Unassigned 432,594 - 432,594
Total fund balances 432,594 1,263,238 1,695,832 Total liabilities and fund balances 708,889$ 1,276,190$ 1,985,079$
MEDITERRA NORTH & MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
NOVEMBER 30, 2015
TotalGovernmental
Funds
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Governmental Funds
2
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 71,679$ 75,068$ 460,343$ 16%Special assessment: off-roll - 39,179 78,359 50%Interest and miscellaneous 9 19 1,000 2%
Total revenues 71,688 114,266 539,702 21%
EXPENDITURESAdministrativeSupervisors - 1,938 7,751 25%Management 6,375 12,750 76,500 17%Accounting services 2,550 5,100 30,600 17%Audit - - 17,000 0%Legal - - 10,000 0%Field management 1,275 2,550 15,300 17%Engineering - - 10,000 0%Trustee - - 10,000 0%Dissemination agent - - 9,106 0%Arbitrage calculation - - 1,500 0%Assessment roll preparation - - 24,000 0%Telephone 22 43 259 17%Postage 139 139 2,500 6%Insurance - 19,046 12,438 153%Printing and binding 135 269 1,615 17%Legal advertising 677 677 2,500 27%Contingencies 93 187 2,000 9%Annual District filing fee - 350 350 100%Website - - 500 0%
Total administrative 11,266 43,049 233,919 18%
Water managementOther contractual 10,603 10,603 140,000 8%Aquascaping - - 125,000 0%Lake bank stabilization - - 30,000 0%Electricity 659 659 9,000 7%Miscellaneous - - 3,000 0%Capital outlay - aeration - - 50,000 0%
Total water management 11,262 11,262 357,000 3%
MEDITERRA NORTH & MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GENERAL FUNDS 001 & 101FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
3
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
MEDITERRA NORTH & MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GENERAL FUNDS 001 & 101FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser 333 333 9,590 3%Tax collector 1,076 1,162 7,193 16%
Total other fees & charges 1,409 1,495 16,783 9%Total expenditures 23,937 55,806 607,702 9%
Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures 47,751 58,460 (68,000)
Fund balances - beginning 384,843 374,134 448,603 Fund balances - ending 432,594$ 432,594$ 380,603$
4
GeneralFund 101
Debt ServiceSeries 2012Fund 252
TotalGovernmental
FundsASSETSCash 234,065$ -$ 234,065$ Investments
Federated 31,066 - 31,066 Revenue A - 33,859 33,859 Reserve A - 363,758 363,758 Prepayment - 3 3
Due from other governmentsMediterra South
General fund 5,417 - 5,417 Debt service - series 1999 48 - 48 Debt service - series 2001 22 - 22 Debt service - series 2003 3,507 - 3,507 Debt service - series 2012 9,166 - 9,166
Due from other fundsMediterra North
General fund - 99,863 99,863 Due from clearing fund 309 - 309 Total assets 283,600$ 497,483$ 781,083$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESLiabilitiesDue to other governments
Mediterra SouthGeneral fund -$ 209$ 209$
Due to other fundsMediterra North
Debt service - series 2012 99,863 - 99,863 Total liabilities 99,863 209 100,072
Fund balancesRestricted for:
Debt service - 497,274 497,274 Unassigned 183,737 - 183,737
Total fund balances 183,737 497,274 681,011
Total liabilities and fund balances 283,600$ 497,483$ 781,083$
MEDITERRA NORTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
BALANCE SHEET
NOVEMBER 30, 2015GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Governmental Funds
5
CurrentMonth
Yearto Date Budget
% ofBudget
REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 31,645$ 31,645$ 164,547$ 19%Interest and miscellaneous 4 9 304 3%
Total revenues 31,649 31,654 164,851 19%
EXPENDITURESAdministrativeSupervisors - 589 2,355 25%Management 1,937 3,873 23,239 17%Accounting services 775 1,549 9,296 17%Audit - - 5,164 0%Legal - - 3,038 0%Field management 387 775 4,648 17%Engineering - - 3,038 0%Trustee - - 3,038 0%Dissemination agent - - 2,766 0%Arbitrage calculation - - 456 0%Assessment roll preparation - - 7,291 0%Telephone 7 13 79 16%Postage 42 42 759 6%Insurance - 5,784 3,778 153%Printing and binding 41 82 491 17%Legal advertising 206 206 759 27%Contingencies 46 93 608 15%Annual District filing fee - 106 106 100%Website - - 152 0%
Total administrative 3,441 13,112 71,061 18%Water managementContractual services 3,221 3,221 42,529 8%Aquascaping - - 37,972 0%Lake bank stabilization - - 9,113 0%Electricity 200 200 2,734 7%Miscellaneous - - 911 0%Capital outlay - aeration - - 15,189 N/A
Total water management 3,421 3,421 108,448 3%Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser 119 119 3,428 3%Tax collector 385 415 2,571 16%Intergovernmental expense - - - N/A
Total other fees & charges 504 534 5,999 9%Total expenditures 7,366 17,067 185,508 9%
Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures 24,283 14,587 (20,657)
Fund balances - beginning 159,454 169,150 189,888 Fund balances - ending 183,737$ 183,737$ 169,231$
MEDITERRA NORTH
GENERAL FUND 101FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTSTATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
6
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 94,678$ 94,678$ 482,148$ 20%Interest 2 5 - N/A
Total revenues 94,680 94,683 482,148 20%
EXPENSESDebt serviceIntergovermental expenditures
Principal - - 235,000 0%Interest 123,574 123,574 247,148 50%Principal prepayment - - - N/ATotal debt service 123,574 123,574 482,148 26%
Other fees & chargesTax collector 172 172 - N/A
Total other fees & charges 172 172 - N/ATotal expenditures 123,746 123,746 482,148 26%
Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures (29,066) (29,063) -
Fund balances - beginning 526,340 526,337 525,915 Fund balances - ending 497,274$ 497,274$ 525,915$
MEDITERRA NORTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
DEBT SERVICE FUND 252 - SERIES 2012 (REFUNDED 2001 BONDS)FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
7
Mediterra North Community Development District Series 2012 $6,025,000
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I05/01/2015 -$ - -$ -$ 11/01/2015 - - 123,573.75 123,573.7505/01/2016 235,000.00 3.400% 123,573.75 358,573.7511/01/2016 - - 119,578.75 119,578.7505/01/2017 245,000.00 3.600% 119,578.75 364,578.7511/01/2017 - - 115,168.75 115,168.7505/01/2018 255,000.00 3.800% 115,168.75 370,168.7511/01/2018 - - 110,323.75 110,323.7505/01/2019 265,000.00 4.000% 110,323.75 375,323.7511/01/2019 - - 105,023.75 105,023.7505/01/2020 275,000.00 4.200% 105,023.75 380,023.7511/01/2020 - - 99,248.75 99,248.7505/01/2021 290,000.00 4.400% 99,248.75 389,248.7511/01/2021 - - 92,868.75 92,868.7505/01/2022 300,000.00 4.500% 92,868.75 392,868.7511/01/2022 - - 86,118.75 86,118.7505/01/2023 315,000.00 4.650% 86,118.75 401,118.7511/01/2023 - - 78,795.00 78,795.0005/01/2024 330,000.00 5.100% 78,795.00 408,795.0011/01/2024 - - 70,380.00 70,380.0005/01/2025 350,000.00 5.100% 70,380.00 420,380.0011/01/2025 - - 61,455.00 61,455.0005/01/2026 365,000.00 5.100% 61,455.00 426,455.0011/01/2026 - - 52,147.50 52,147.5005/01/2027 385,000.00 5.100% 52,147.50 437,147.5011/01/2027 - - 42,330.00 42,330.0005/01/2028 405,000.00 5.100% 42,330.00 447,330.0011/01/2028 - - 32,002.50 32,002.5005/01/2029 425,000.00 5.100% 32,002.50 457,002.5011/01/2029 - - 21,165.00 21,165.0005/01/2030 450,000.00 5.100% 21,165.00 471,165.0011/01/2030 - - 9,690.00 9,690.0005/01/2031 380,000.00 5.100% 9,690.00 389,690.00
Total $5,270,000.00 - $2,439,740.00 $7,709,740.00
8
General001
Debt ServiceSeries 2012Fund 210
Debt ServiceSeries 2013Fund 204
TotalGovernmental
FundsASSETSCash 251,692$ -$ -$ 251,692$ Investments
Federated 71,885 - - 71,885 BB&T - cdars 100,782 - - 100,782 Revenue A - 63,627 20,582 84,209 Reserve A - 446,270 75,000 521,270 Prepayment - 2,213 - 2,213
Due from other governmentsMediterra North
Debt service - 2012 209 - - 209 Due from other funds
Mediterra SouthGeneral - 110,248 60,767 171,015
Due from clearing fund 721 - - 721 Total assets 425,289$ 622,358$ 156,349$ 1,203,996$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESLiabilitiesAccounts payable -$ 9,166$ -$ 9,166$ Due to other governments
Mediterra NorthGeneral fund 5,417 70 3,507 8,994
Due to other fundsMediterra South
Debt service - series 2012 110,248 - - 110,248 Debt service - series 2013 60,767 - - 60,767
Total liabilities 176,432 9,236 3,507 189,175
Fund balancesRestricted for:
Debt service - 613,122 152,842 765,964 Unassigned 248,857 - - 248,857
Total fund balances 248,857 613,122 152,842 1,014,821
Total liabilities & fund balances 425,289$ 622,358$ 156,349$ 1,203,996$
Governmental Funds
MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
BALANCE SHEETGOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
NOVEMBER 30, 2015
9
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
REVENUESpecial assessment: on roll 40,034$ 43,423$ 295,796$ 15%Special assessment: off-roll - 39,179 78,359 50%Interest and miscellaneous 5 10 696 1%
Total revenues 40,039 82,612 374,851 22%
EXPENDITURESAdministrativeSupervisors - 1,349 5,396 25%Management 4,438 8,877 53,261 17%Accounting 1,775 3,551 21,304 17%Audit - - 11,836 0%Legal - - 6,962 0%Field management 888 1,775 10,652 17%Engineering - - 6,962 0%Trustee - - 6,962 0%Dissemination agent - - 6,340 0%Arbitrage calculation - - 1,044 0%Assessment roll preparation - - 16,709 0%Telephone 15 30 180 17%Postage 97 97 1,741 6%Insurance - 13,262 8,660 153%Printing and binding 94 187 1,124 17%Legal advertising 471 471 1,741 27%Contingencies 47 94 1,392 7%Annual District filing fee - 244 244 100%Website - - 348 0%
Total administrative 7,825 29,937 162,858 18%Water managementContractual services 7,382 7,382 97,471 8%Aquascaping - - 87,028 0%Lake bank stabilization - - 20,887 0%Electricity 459 459 6,266 7%Miscellaneous - - 2,089 0%Capital outlay - aeration - - 34,811 N/A
Total water management 7,841 7,841 248,552 3%
GENERAL FUND 001FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
10
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
GENERAL FUND 001FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser 214 214 6,162 3%Tax collector 691 747 4,622 16%
Total other fees & charges 905 961 10,784 9%Total expenditures 16,571 38,739 422,194 9%
Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures 23,468 43,873 (47,343)
Fund balances - beginning 225,389 204,984 300,808 Fund balances - ending 248,857$ 248,857$ 253,465$
11
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 84,072$ 91,189$ 627,796$ 15%Assessment prepayments - - - N/AInterest 3 7 - N/A
Total revenues 84,075 91,196 627,796 15%
EXPENDITURESDebt servicePrincipal - - 295,000 0%Prepayment B 10,000 10,000 - N/AInterest 154,954 154,954 309,908 50%
Total debt service 164,954 164,954 604,908 27%
Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser - - 13,079 0%Tax collector 1,385 1,503 9,809 15%
Total other fees & charges 1,385 1,503 22,888 7%Total expenditures 166,339 166,457 627,796 27%
Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures (82,264) (75,261) -
Fund balances - beginning 695,386 688,383 667,483 Fund balances - ending 613,122$ 613,122$ 667,483$
MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
DEBT SERVICE FUND 210 - SERIES 2012 (REFUNDED 1999 & 2001 BONDS)FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
12
Mediterra South Community Development District Series 2012 $7,430,000
Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I
05/01/2015 - - - -11/01/2015 - - 154,953.75 154,953.7505/01/2016 295,000.00 3.400% 154,953.75 449,953.7511/01/2016 - - 149,938.75 149,938.7505/01/2017 305,000.00 3.600% 149,938.75 454,938.7511/01/2017 - - 144,448.75 144,448.7505/01/2018 310,000.00 3.800% 144,448.75 454,448.7511/01/2018 - - 138,558.75 138,558.7505/01/2019 325,000.00 4.000% 138,558.75 463,558.7511/01/2019 - - 132,058.75 132,058.7505/01/2020 340,000.00 4.200% 132,058.75 472,058.7511/01/2020 - - 124,918.75 124,918.7505/01/2021 355,000.00 4.400% 124,918.75 479,918.7511/01/2021 - - 117,108.75 117,108.7505/01/2022 370,000.00 4.500% 117,108.75 487,108.7511/01/2022 - - 108,783.75 108,783.7505/01/2023 385,000.00 4.650% 108,783.75 493,783.7511/01/2023 - - 99,832.50 99,832.5005/01/2024 405,000.00 5.100% 99,832.50 504,832.5011/01/2024 - - 89,505.00 89,505.0005/01/2025 430,000.00 5.100% 89,505.00 519,505.0011/01/2025 - - 78,540.00 78,540.0005/01/2026 450,000.00 5.100% 78,540.00 528,540.0011/01/2026 - - 67,065.00 67,065.0005/01/2027 475,000.00 5.100% 67,065.00 542,065.0011/01/2027 - - 54,952.50 54,952.5005/01/2028 500,000.00 5.100% 54,952.50 554,952.5011/01/2028 - - 42,202.50 42,202.5005/01/2029 525,000.00 5.100% 42,202.50 567,202.5011/01/2029 - - 28,815.00 28,815.0005/01/2030 555,000.00 5.100% 28,815.00 583,815.0011/01/2030 - - 14,662.50 14,662.5005/01/2031 575,000.00 5.100% 14,662.50 589,662.50
Total $6,600,000.00 - $3,092,690.00 $9,692,690.00
13
CurrentMonth
Year toDate Budget
% ofBudget
REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 43,122$ 46,773$ 319,781$ 15%Interest 1 2 - N/A
Total revenues 43,123 46,775 319,781 15%
EXPENDITURESDebt servicePrincipal - - 130,000 0%Interest 88,272 88,272 176,544 50%
Total debt service 88,272 88,272 306,544 29%
Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser - - 4,997 0%Tax collector 941 1,021 6,662 15%
Total other fees & charges 941 1,021 11,659 9%Total expenditures 89,213 89,293 318,203 28%
Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures (46,090) (42,518) 1,578
Fund balances - beginning 198,932 195,360 188,398 Fund balances - ending 152,842$ 152,842$ 189,976$
MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
DEBT SERVICE FUND 204 - SERIES 2013 (REFUNDED 2003A BONDS)FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
14
Mediterra South Community Development District Series 2013
Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I
11/01/2015 88,271.88 88,271.8805/01/2016 130,000.00 0.041% 88,271.88 218,271.8811/01/2016 85,590.63 85,590.6305/01/2017 135,000.00 0.041% 85,590.63 220,590.6311/01/2017 82,806.25 82,806.2505/01/2018 145,000.00 0.041% 82,806.25 227,806.2511/01/2018 79,815.63 79,815.6305/01/2019 145,000.00 0.041% 79,815.63 224,815.6311/01/2019 76,825.00 76,825.0005/01/2020 155,000.00 0.041% 76,825.00 231,825.0011/01/2020 73,628.13 73,628.1305/01/2021 160,000.00 0.041% 73,628.13 233,628.1311/01/2021 70,328.13 70,328.1305/01/2022 170,000.00 0.041% 70,328.13 240,328.1311/01/2022 66,821.88 66,821.8805/01/2023 175,000.00 0.041% 66,821.88 241,821.8811/01/2023 63,212.50 63,212.5005/01/2024 180,000.00 0.041% 63,212.50 243,212.5011/01/2024 59,500.00 59,500.0005/01/2025 185,000.00 0.050% 59,500.00 244,500.0011/01/2025 54,875.00 54,875.0005/01/2026 200,000.00 0.050% 54,875.00 254,875.0011/01/2026 49,875.00 49,875.0005/01/2027 210,000.00 0.050% 49,875.00 259,875.0011/01/2027 44,625.00 44,625.0005/01/2028 220,000.00 0.050% 44,625.00 264,625.0011/01/2028 39,125.00 39,125.0005/01/2029 230,000.00 0.050% 39,125.00 269,125.0011/01/2029 33,375.00 33,375.0005/01/2030 245,000.00 0.050% 33,375.00 278,375.0011/01/2030 27,250.00 27,250.0005/01/2031 255,000.00 0.050% 27,250.00 282,250.0011/01/2031 20,875.00 20,875.0005/01/2032 270,000.00 0.050% 20,875.00 290,875.0011/01/2032 14,125.00 14,125.0005/01/2033 285,000.00 0.050% 14,125.00 299,125.0011/01/2033 7,000.00 7,000.0005/01/2034 280,000.00 0.050% 7,000.00 287,000.00
Total $3,775,000.00 - $2,075,850.06 $5,850,850.06
$4,030,000