MEDITERRA SOUTHmediterracdds.net/_assets/documents/fy-2016/2016-01-20-MSCDD... · Mediterra South Community Development District 2300 Glades Road, ... 29 Colleen Kvetko Resident 30

MEDITERRA SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DISTRICT

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

January 20, 2016

Mediterra South Community Development District 2300 Glades Road, Suite 410WBoca Raton, Florida 33431

Phone: (561) 571-0010●Fax: (561) 571-0013Toll-free: (877) 276-0889

January 14, 2016

Board of Supervisors

Mediterra South Community Development District

Dear Board Members:

A Regular Meeting of the Mediterra South Community Development District’s Board of Supervisors will

be held on Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 11:00 a.m., at The Club at Mediterra, 15755 Corso

Meditera Circle, Naples, Florida 34110. The agenda is as follows:

1. Call to Order/Roll Call

2. Public Comments [3 minutes per person]

3. Presentation: Preliminary Assessment and Options for Wildfire Reduction

4. Update: Directors and Officers Coverage with Aggregate of $10M

5. Approval of October 21, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes

Action Items

6. Other Business

7. Staff Reports

A. Attorney

B. Engineer

C. Manager

i. Approval of Unaudited Financial Statements as of November 30, 2015

ii. NEXT MEETING DATE: May 18, 2016 at 11:30 A.M.

8. Supervisors’ Requests

9. Adjournment

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (239) 464-7114.

Sincerely,

Chesley E. Adams, Jr.

District Manager

ATTENDEES:

Please identify yourself each

time you speak to facilitate

accurate transcription of

meeting minutes.

FOR RESIDENTS TO ‘LISTEN IN’ TO THE BOARD MEETING

CALL IN NUMBER: 1-888-632-3382

CONFERENCE ID: SOUTH

PROGRAM TITLE: MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING

FOR BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF TO ATTEND BY TELEPHONE:

CALL-IN NUMBER WILL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF MEETING

MINUTES OF MEETING 1

MEDITERRA SOUTH 2

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 3

4

A Regular Meeting of the Mediterra South Community Development District’s Board of 5

Supervisors was held on Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 11:00 a.m., at The Club at 6

Mediterra, 15755 Corso Mediterra Circle, Naples, Florida 34110. 7

8

Present and constituting a quorum were: 9 10

Ken Nails Chair 11

Bill Rowe Vice Chair 12

Ken Tarr Assistant Secretary 13

Mike Bishko (via telephone) Assistant Secretary 14

Dallas Luby Assistant Secretary 15

16

Also present were: 17 18

Chuck Adams District Manager 19

Cleo Crismond Assistant Regional Manager 20

Dave Robson District Engineer 21

Jonathan Johnson (via telephone) District Counsel 22

Alyssa Wilson Hopping Green & Sams 23

Greg Pick MCA General Manager 24

Frank Godshall Mediterra North Chair 25

Robert Greenberg Resident & MCA Board Member 26

Linda Bobris Resident 27

Rita Sokol Resident 28

Colleen Kvetko Resident 29

Jerry Kumin Resident 30

Rosi Gaul Resident 31

32

33

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Call to Order/Roll Call 34 35

Mr. Nails called the meeting to order at 11:10 a.m., and noted, for the record, that 36

Supervisors Nails, Rowe, Tarr and Luby were present, in person. Supervisor Bishko was 37

attending via telephone. 38

39

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Comments [3 minutes per person] 40

41

Ms. Linda Bobris, a resident, stated: 42

MEDITERRA SOUTH CDD October 21, 2015

2

“Dear Members of the Mediterra CDD Board, 43

There are issues related to the public relations image of the community, 44

the distress caused to members of the community and cruelty to the 45

animals involved. The focus of these remarks regards the issues related to 46

the agreement under discussion as others have addressed the foregoing 47

concerns. 48

Parties to the Contract prior performance: 49

The Mediterra Community Association (MCA) has acknowledged it killed 50

15 deer in violation of the terms of a prior agreement with the CDD 51

Districts. That agreement expired in August of 2014. The CDD District 52

took no action in this regard to stop the unauthorized killing of the deer. 53

Both parties were in violation of their duties. The MCA for not abiding 54

by and managing to it’s authorizations and the CDD Districts for not 55

intervening and ensuring that there was proper oversight, contractual 56

authorization and communication regarding the deer killing activity. This 57

is indicative of a lack of control and inattention to proper contract 58

management. 59

Over-population of deer: 60

The agreement under review refers to deer overpopulation. No evidence 61

exists that this is the case. There is an unwillingness on the part of the 62

MCA to use qualified resources expert in deer management to assess the 63

situation in Mediterra and advise on best practices. These resources have 64

been forwarded to the MCA and CDD without action on their part. The 65

CDD needs to balance their position to include non lethal means of 66

managing deer. This is not a consideration of either the MCA or this 67

agreement. This agreement focuses on culling. 68

The consequences noted in the Recitals such as collision with cars and 69

diseased transmission are moot points. These consequences are either 70

unproven, not present or biased by views of deer management data from 71

outside of Florida. In any event, these risks will exist regardless of the 72

number of deer on CDD property. Even if just 1 Deer. 73


3

Third Party Contractor: 74

The CDD Districts cannot absolve themselves of their legislated duties 75

by deferring to the MCA who in turn further defer to a Contractor. That 76

moves control 2 steps from the legislated source. The MCA is a non 77

public body and not organized under the same legal construct or 78

responsibilities as the CDD. Further the contractor the MCA intends to 79

hire to do the culling has no direct responsibility to the CDD. The 80

Rejoinder agreement that is referenced to in this agreement asks that the 81

contractor be bound by this agreement. That deflects responsibility from 82

the MCA to the contractor. The CDD will not know if that contractor 83

agreement was signed with full knowledge by the contractor of the legal 84

and liability taken on. Further the contractor may modify or otherwise 85

disqualify the rejoinder agreement. The CDD Districts will not know if 86

the Rejoinder was signed for convenience, without due diligence by the 87

contractor or under pressure to get the contract work. The Rejoinder 88

deflects responsibility of this agreement to the Contractor. It effectively 89

renders this agreement meaningless. The Contractor is actually 90

executing the deer culling. 91

If a contract such as this is to be executed it should be between the 92

Contractor and the CDD and not deflected to an intervening party like the 93

MCA. 94

Insurance indemnification: 95

There are terms in the contract stating that the parties hold each other 96

harmless for damages and that liability insurance is a requirement. We 97

have already seen that the MCA did not abide by the first agreement and 98

that the CDD did not take correction action or was otherwise aware of the 99

infractions. The CDD has no way of controlling or auditing the actions 100

of the MCA, its’ staff and its’ contractors. The MCA can withhold 101

information and be non-communicative. Such actions would never be 102

transparent. Given that the agreement is a 10 year term there is high risk 103

in such an arrangement. 104


4

Despite the insurance and indemnification the CDD is not relieved of its’ 105

responsibilities to be the primary party for deer management. In the event 106

of an insurance claim the carrier will look closely at the control 107

weaknessses in this contract and take action accordingly. 108

If it is determined that the CDD willfully and knowingly put itself in a 109

position where it lacked control and oversight the protection afforded by 110

insurance may not materialize. The same applies to the MCA. This 111

agreement can be construed in such a willful action and thereby deemed 112

reckless. 113

There is no mention of insurance to protect the residents, of Mediterra, 114

their children or pets or other persons present on the Mediterra property 115

who may suffer harm due to the actions of the Contractor. The amount of 116

insurance in the agreement is not adequate to cover such open ended 117

risks. These risks could potentially cause death. Further the Contractor 118

himself is at risk if mistaken for an intruder by a resident. 119

Notice of Hunting: 120

The 24 Hour notice of intent to hunt is not adequate even between the 121

CDD and MCA. The CDD and/or MCA need to inform and remind 122

residents well in advance of hunting to mitigate risk of harm or injury. 123

There is no mention in the contract of providing this information to the 124

residents. This places the liability for damages on the MCA and CDD as 125

they are the parties that enable the hunting to occur. 126

Federal Conservation Law: 127

There are Federal laws related to conservation, protection of endangered 128

species and protection of plants that are missing from this agreement. 129

They apply in addition to the Florida statutes. They need to be referenced, 130

addressed and documented in the agreement. There are potential 131

limitations to what can occur inside a fully enclosed area like Mediterra. 132

Internal Revenue Service and Tax Reporting: 133

The agreement references that there is no employment relationship 134

between the MCA, the CDD Districts and the Contractor. That does not 135


5

nor can it legally negate the need to comply with Federal tax laws related 136

to deemed income. Tax accounting and reporting needs to be explicitly 137

called out as a requirement and validated by the CDD for compliance. 138

With respect to taxation, the Contractor derives a taxable benefit by virtue 139

of the value of the deer meat and hides and body parts taken. These have 140

a cash value in kind. The Deer are the assets of the District. They have a 141

value in kind and need to be accounted for as a taxable income to the 142

hunter. This requires filing of the related tax documents and notices of 143

benefit regardless of the employment wording in the agreement. This is 144

Federally mandated and cannot be negated by the terms of employment or 145

lack thereof noted in the agreement. 146

As the Deer belong to the CDD and not the MCA the contractual 147

relationship and tax reporting rests with the CDD and not the MCA. If 148

the CDD does not follow IRS guidance they are in violation of tax laws 149

and so is the Contractor. The MCA’s only responsibility relates to paying 150

the contractor. The tax recording for the payment is handled using 151

relevant tax protocol depending on his status and an incorporated 152

business, LLC or individual. 153

Summary: 154

The agreement under consideration has multiple deficiencies and will 155

expose the CDD, the MCA, the Contractor, Mediterra Residents and 156

third parties to undo risk. It does not take a balanced view of wildlife 157

management. The CDD and MCA appear intent on killing Deer as the 158

ultimate solution. They have been advised on but are not using 159

professional resources to study, manage and protect the Deer and their 160

environment. The CDD and MCA appear to want to rush into this 161

agreement despite the risks, irreversible wildlife eradication and image 162

damage to the community inherent in doing so. 163

This is a bad agreement that appears hastily and poorly architected, 164

without adequate governance or thought and lacking in auditability. It 165

should not be adopted. 166


6

I enter my comments on the agreement deficiencies into the public 167

record.” 168

Mr. Jerry Kumin, a resident, stated: 169

“We both have the same goals for Mediterra - to establish us as the 170

premiere community in Naples and the USA. Being designated Audubon 171

sanctioned we cherish wildlife. Most residents bought here to enjoy the 172

plethora and diversity of animals. Where are all our deer? Do you see 173

any? CDD is under FL statute 190 and 190.012 establishes your role to 174

“manage and preserve wildlife”. YOUR DUTY IS PRESERVATION. The 175

MCA responsibility is for homeowner benefits only, has no experience 176

with wildlife and hired a hunter for killing deer prior to a report by a 177

licensed wildlife management expert to report the size and health of the 178

herd and provide advice. How can you assign this responsibility to the 179

MCA when they killed with expired license, has not provided to the CDDs 180

a written report of numbers killed, size documentation with photos, 181

documentation of disposition of venison and carcass. This behavior 182

degrades the value of living in Mediterra. In contradistinction we could 183

be a sample community for wildlife preservation and involve Fla. 184

University wildlife section with student involvement for expert advice. 185

Mediterra would be a model for others. I want to ask each supervisor 186

member why the CDD does not perform the state mandated intent instead 187

of assigning this to the MCA? 188

Have you reviewed all public MCA docs and located the word wildlife? 189

Mr. Kumin reported that Mr. Stephen Wilson reported, at the MCA meeting, that he 190

spoke with a Florida University Professor of Wildlife who offered to evaluate the deer and 191

educate his students on wildlife control. Mr. Kumin requested that each Board Member state 192

why the CDD should not be responsible for the deer. Mr. Nails noted that the Board was not 193

responding to questions, at this time. 194

Ms. Rita Sokol, a resident, read the following statement from Mr. Gary Loser, a resident: 195

“Dear Mediterra CDD Board Members: 196


7

I ask that this Board of Supervisors not enter into a License Agreement 197

with the Mediterra Community Association providing the MCA access to 198

CDD lands to hunt deer. That is all the MCA wants to do -- hunt the deer 199

-- not manage it by doing other things in addition to culling. 200

I ask that this Board of Supervisors take responsibility for managing the 201

deer herd itself, instead of delegating this important responsibility to the 202

MCA, which has no expertise in managing a deer herd. 203

This Board can continue to use the Wrathell Hunt firm for District 204

Management and Wrathell Hunt can hire a company engaged in deer 205

management for support as it is needed. Mr. Stephen Wilson of the MCA 206

Board can provide this Board with the names of qualified deer 207

management companies. I believe he proposed an option of working with 208

the University of Florida where a professor will involve students majoring 209

in wildlife management. Involving college students in this will help make 210

Mediterra seem a more desirable community to live in. 211

Many things need to be addressed to maintain a healthy deer herd in 212

Mediterra. Just killing the deer is not the answer. There are additional 213

ways to manage the size of the deer herd and keep it healthy. A deer 214

management company can help do this; the MCA can’t. 215

The Florida Legislature in the CDD statute has essentially said that CDD 216

Boards are the best way to manage the health and size of a deer herd on 217

CDD lands. That is why the statute says (FYI – it is statute 190.012(1)(f)) 218

the CDDs have authority to oversee “conservation areas, mitigation 219

areas, and wildlife habitat, including the maintenance of any…animal 220

species.” 221

I ask you to please not delegate maintenance of our deer herd to the MCA. 222

Instead pass a resolution that Wrathell Hunt and a deer management 223

company will do what’s best for Mediterra. 224

Thank you, Gary Loser” 225


8

Ms. Colleen Kvetko, a resident, agreed with the previous opinions and believed it is the 226

CDD’s responsibility to undertake wildlife management. She felt that she is paying for the MCA 227

to kill deer. Ms. Kvetko expressed the following opinions: 228

Residents received no communication from the MCA on their plans to kill 229

Mediterra’s deer. 230

The MCA mentioned that 80 hours was dedicated to this issue but residents spent 231

more than 80 hours of research, which does not make the MCA experts. 232

The MCA must use experts for Whitetail Deer from the University of Florida, 233

Florida Fish and Wildlife (FWC) and The Conservancy to manage and count the 234

herd appropriately. 235

The MCA admitted that their license expired in 2014; therefore, killing the deer 236

was illegal. 237

The MCA is on a mission to kill Mediterra’s deer, yet they do not know how large 238

the herd is and what options are available. 239

The MCA must use the Florida stats on Whitetail Deer. 240

No other community performs deer culling in Lee or Collier County. 241

The MCA does not outline their expectations in the agreement. 242

Ms. Kvetko requested that the Board not execute the agreement until further research was 243

completed. 244

Ms. Kvetko provided a letter from Mr. Angel Ewing, a resident. 245

Ms. Bobris submitted a picture of a boar trap and asked why there was boar trapping. 246

Mr. Adams explained that the MCA requested permission to set traps because boars caused 247

damage. Mr. Nails asked if the Board authorized the traps. Mr. Adams advised Mr. Pick to set 248

the traps a couple of months ago. 249

Mr. Frank Godshall, Chair of Mediterra North CDD Board, noticed three or four deer, 250

last Friday night, at the end of Terrazza, in the large hedge area. He attended the last MCA 251

meeting and heard the controversy but felt that the MCA presentation on deer management was 252

excellent, despite a number of opposing views. Mr. Godshall weighed both sides and believed 253

that the MCA has the right approach. At last week’s Mediterra North CDD meeting, Mr. Robert 254

Greenberg, MCA Board Member, spoke on behalf of the MCA Board, in favor of the agreement 255

and, although residents were not in favor, the Mediterra North CDD Board approved the license 256


9

agreement. Mr. Godshall voiced his opinion that the Mediterra South CDD Board will arrive at 257

the same decision, once the pros and cons were weighed. 258

Mr. Robert Greenberg, a resident and MCA Board, who owns a home in Mediterra North 259

and lives in Mediterra South, described several occasions where deer attempted to enter his 260

home. Twice, a family member hit a deer with their vehicle because there was no active deer 261

management program; he was tired of hearing that he acted illegally and all he wanted was to kill 262

deer. 263

Mr. Greenberg provided the following reasons for approving the license agreement: 264

1. Uncontrolled growth in an enclosed limited environment. The herd size is 265

estimated between 120 and 150 and an unchecked herd increases between 266

20 and 40% each year, depending upon the range size, health of the herd 267

and quality of food available. The average annual home range size for 268

open habitats for adult females is approximately one square mile and two-269

and-a-half square miles for yearlings and adult males. The preserve area 270

within both CDDs is 278 acres. 271

2. Natural enemies of deer are non-existent in Mediterra. 272

Regarding residents who moved to Mediterra for the deer, Mr. Greenberg noted that none 273

of the literature for Mediterra shows deer as a selling point. Mediterra was intended to be a high 274

end gated community with a preserve. 275

3. Both CDDs are not staffed or equipped to coordinate a deer management 276

program. Deer move between the two CDDs, they disregard boundaries 277

and do not know human boundaries. Neither CDD have shown an interest 278

in undertaking a deer management program. 279

4. The MCA is the logical administrative and logistical entity whose sole 280

role is to preserve, enhance and maintain the community as a whole, 281

without any single special interest. It is best equipped on a daily and long-282

term basis to implement a proper deer management program. 283

Mr. Greenberg noted that the MCA works with both CDDs and The Club. The Club does 284

not want deer destroying golf course greens. 285

5. Neglecting to undertake sound deer management practices, it will lead to a 286

malnourished diseased herd, increase the likelihood of deer moving to 287


10

populated areas in Mediterra, destroy property, increase the risk of vehicle 288

accidents and increase the risk of transmission of airborne diseases. 289

6. The 278 acre west side preserve, which the CDD is legally bound to 290

oversee, will be permanently damaged by too many foraging deer. Each 291

adult deer consumes approximately 3% of their body weight or four 292

pounds of vegetation per day. Severe over-browsing alters plants, species, 293

composition, distribution and abundance and reduces undergrowth 294

diversity, due to the inability of seedlings to re-establish themselves. 295

Their feces will ultimately contaminate CDD water features. 296

7. Degradation of the preserve by over population will endanger other 297

animals that depend on the same habitat, such as fox, rabbit, opossum, 298

armadillo and squirrel. 299

8. While land management practices can influence deer production, the 300

CDDs do not perform any land management practices to influence the 301

deer habitat. 302

9. The most effective and only economical practical method of deer herd 303

management is regulated hunting. Through regulated hunting, an 304

adequate number of animals can be removed from growing herd 305

populations each year. This will keep the deer herd in balance with the 306

habitat and achieve what is known as optimal carrying capacity for a 307

stable and healthy deer population, as well as protect the habitat they live 308

in. 309

10. None of the alternatives to control hunting are workable, cost effective or 310

practical. Doing nothing is simply not a solution. Contraception and 311

sterilization poses the following problems: Cost, logistics, abate 312

distribution, dosage and control, as well as, ingestion of the bait by non-313

target wildlife. Permitting is required by FWC, as well as Lee and Collier 314

counties. There is a time delay, which is unknown and the permitting 315

process may not be successful. Research failed to reveal any such effort 316

anywhere in Florida regarding permitting and implementation. Trap and 317

transfer efforts have proven to be labor intensive and costly, almost $1,000 318


11

an animal. In addition, the mortality rates of relocated deer are between 319

50% and 85%. Reintroducing natural predators is not an option, for the 320

obvious reasons. 321

11. Mediterra North approved the agreement. 322

Mr. Greenberg acknowledged that the expired license was an honest mistake, due to an 323

administrative error. The culling was halted when it was brought to the MCA’s attention; the 324

MCA broke the agreement but not the law. 325

Mr. Greenberg proposed the following: 326

Assess the deer population by hiring a deer census company or a wildlife 327

management specialist to perform an accurate census this year. Tomorrow, 328

proposals will be presented to the MCA Board. 329

Perform another census, after the next fawning period, in the spring of 2016, and 330

each year, thereafter. 331

Be open and transparent by reporting to both CDDs and residents and educating 332

residents. 333

No deer hunting until the next hunting season and only by bow and arrow and 334

crossbow. Firearms are prohibited in Mediterra and in Lee and Collier Counties. 335

Mr. Greenberg explained that the goal of deer management is to have a healthy herd, in 336

balance with its habitat that does not interfere with the rights of the community and other uses of 337

the land surrounding the preserve. 338

Mr. Greenberg’s position was fact driven, devoid of emotion; he hoped that residents 339

would assist in crafting a quality deer management program. 340

Mr. Nails asked what happens if a hunter wounds a deer but does not kill it. Mr. 341

Greenberg indicated that the hunter must follow the deer and kill it, preferably with a knife. 342

Mr. Tarr recalled that the MCA started discussing the deer problem several years ago and 343

thanked Mr. Greenberg for his time and effort. In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Adams 344

indicated that Management was never involved in any wildlife species management program and 345

deferred to District Counsel regarding an indemnification provision. 346

Mr. Tarr requested that the MCA maintain insurance through the term of the agreement. 347

Mr. Greenberg will provide insurance certificates and noted that the MCA indemnified both 348

CDDs against property damage and public liability, through the MCA’s insurance provider; 349


12

however, the hunter must carry general liability insurance. Mr. Nails noted that the agreement 350

includes a provision for any insurance changes or termination, by either party, upon 30 days 351

written notice. Mr. Greenberg explained that the joinder agreement, attached to the license, 352

requires a hunter to carry insurance. 353

Mr. Tarr asked if the CDD owns the deer. Mr. Greenberg advised that, in the open range, 354

deer do not belong to anyone; however, in a closed range, the state recognized that the owner has 355

the right to control the deer population, provided deer are not hunted without a degradation 356

permit. Mr. Tarr pointed out that, since the CDD does not have enclosed preserves, The Club, 357

MCA and CDDs own the deer. Mr. Greenberg noted that each entity has a claim to the deer. 358

Mr. Tarr surmised that the CDDs own the deer in the closed range. Mr. Greenberg explained 359

that the MCA is the only entity that can overlay all competing interests, such as the CDDs and 360

The Club; the license agreement was simply one more agreement. 361

Mr. Tarr asked about the law for disposal of deer meat. Mr. Greenberg indicated that 362

Florida does not allow the transportation of deer carcasses out of state; it only permits for 363

transportation of the hide. In the past, the hunter was permitted to take deer meat for personal 364

use and proposed that the hunter donate excess meat to a food bank or to the University of 365

Florida. 366

Mr. Tarr asked about the recommended amount of deer, based on CDD acreage. Mr. 367

Greenberg indicated that, based on research, Florida and other southern states are considered 368

“outliers” because of an abundance of vegetation. The number of deer is based on the maximum 369

ecological carrying capacity, meaning, the maximum number supported by a habitat and the 370

optimum carrying capacity. 371

Mr. Nails asked when the first hunt will occur, if the agreement was approved and a deer 372

count was completed. Mr. Greenberg replied next fall. 373

Mr. Luby asked if deer are nocturnal. Mr. Greenberg indicated that deer typically remain 374

in the forest during the day and are frequently out at dusk. 375

Mr. Tarr asked where 15 deer were taken from. Mr. Greenberg did not know. 376

Mr. Bishko was surprised at the extent of Mr. Greenberg’s research and the amount of 377

information compiled and agreed that Mr. Greenberg has the right approach for deer 378

management. 379


13

Mr. Bishko voiced concern about deer spreading Lime Disease and a resident’s comment 380

that there was no proof that deer ticks create problems. He believed that many fears are 381

displaced, as culling deer is safe, when a herd is excessive and is supported by the Audubon 382

Society. He favored this agreement and was pleased that Mediterra is taking this approach, 383

through the MCA, which is the best organization to handle it. 384

Consideration of License Agreement By and Between Mediterra North Community 385

Development District, Mediterra South Community Development District, 386

Mediterra Community Association, Inc., for Deer Population Management 387

***This item, previously the Fourth Order of Business, was presented out of order.*** 388

Mr. Adams reported that a revised License Agreement was provided, under separate 389

cover, for the Board’s consideration. Paragraph 5 was adjusted to include the following 390

provision: 391

“C. The MCA shall annually provide the Districts’ representative with 392

copies of all reports and plans related to the deer taking exercises within one 393

week of the adoption or finalization of such reports and plans.” 394

Mr. Adams explained that, as census reports are secured, a plan is formulated for 395

managing the herd and the reports are distributed to the CDDs and posted on each District’s 396

website to address the transparency issue. Mr. Greenberg did not favor posting on the internet, 397

as he was concerned about verbal attacks and noted that the document is considered an MCA 398

document, which is available to any resident. 399

Mr. Bishko asked if the same version of the agreement was approved by the Mediterra 400

North CDD. Mr. Adams replied affirmatively. Mr. Bishko referred to the second “Whereas” 401

and noted that residents were not only receiving benefit but the entire county was, also. 402

Regarding Paragraph 7B, Mr. Bishko pointed out that language was not included to 403

require the MCA to provide copies of renewal notices to both Districts. Mr. Adams indicated 404

that the Districts will receive the initial Certificate of Insurance (COI) and a requirement will be 405

included on the COI to provide 30-day notice of non-renewal or termination. 406

Mr. Tarr noted that the agreement says that the CDDs and MCA want to control 407

overpopulation but overpopulation has not been determined. Mr. Greenberg clarified that the 408

purpose is to prevent overpopulation but voiced his opinion that there is overpopulation; 409

therefore, the agreement should remain, as written. Mr. Bishko agreed, as it was not substantive. 410


14

Mr. Johnson advised that the agreement sets out principles but the key parts of the agreement 411

start on Page 2, after the “Now, THEREFORE” language. 412

413

On MOTION by Mr. Bishko and seconded by Mr. Luby, with 414

all in favor, the License Agreement By and Between Mediterra 415

North Community Development District, Mediterra South 416

Community Development District, Mediterra Community 417

Association, Inc., for Deer Population Management, as 418

amended, with the MCA providing their reports and plans, 419

was approved. 420

421

422

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Consideration of Award of Contract: 423

Lake & Wetland Maintenance 424 425

Ms. Crismond reviewed the memorandum regarding the RFP for lake and wetland 426

maintenance and noted that three contractors submitted proposals. The proposal submitted by 427

the current contractor, LakeMasters Aquatic Weed Control, Inc. (LakeMasters), was 19% above 428

the current contract, due to high chemical and labor costs. There is a higher level in service, due 429

to the manual removal of weeds from littoral shelves, which causes much less damage. 430

In response to Mr. Nails’ question, Ms. Crismond indicated that the Mediterra North 431

CDD Board selected LakeMasters, subject to LakeMasters coming before the Board next year, 432

prior to the Board approving the second year option of the contract. 433

Mr. Tarr recalled that, at a prior meeting, the Board discussed removal of canna lilies on 434

22 lakes, at a cost of $20,000. Mr. Adams noted that the actual cost was approximately $35,000 435

to $39,000, under separate agreement, as this was a one-time event that was not included in the 436

contract. Ms. Crismond requested an updated proposal from LakeMasters, as the prior proposal 437

was submitted several months ago and this exercise was imminent. Mr. Adams recalled that the 438

Board approved the canna lily removal for budget purposes. A Board Member expressed 439

concern about LakeMasters not honoring their price. Mr. Adams explained that, this summer, 440

the canna lilies and all aquatic plants blossomed and he did not want to hold LakeMasters 441

accountable to an estimate submitted in January, as there was a great deal of activity in the lake 442

bank population. Mr. Adams wanted an actual cost, based on positive results, attributable to 443

management of infestations within the littoral plants, using a chemical that killed non-beneficial 444

plants and stunted the growth of the beneficial plants, particularly new seedlings. 445


15

Mr. Adams recalled that, for two contract cycles in a row, LakeMasters was approved, 446

contingent upon negotiating a price between the lowest bidder and LakeMasters. He pointed out 447

that the Board was comfortable with LakeMasters but mandated that LakeMasters take a more 448

labor intensive approach to protect beneficial plants. 449

Based on increases in labor and insurance costs, Mr. Adams recommended LakeMasters, 450

as their proposal was in line with the current level of service, which is the level of service 451

preferred by the community. 452

In response to a question, Ms. Crismond indicated that LakeMasters’ performance was 453

better than in prior years and their response time is immediate. 454

Mr. Nails asked why the Mediterra North CDD only approved one year. Mr. Adams 455

explained that there is a statutory limit, on an annual basis. The recommendation is for one year 456

but the Board can measure LakeMasters’ performance and decide whether to proceed with year 457

two. In August, 2016, a proposal for the second year will be provided, along with a Lake Audit 458

and pictures; if the Board decides to go out for bid, Staff will commence the RFP process and 459

provide proposals at the October, 2016 meeting. 460

Mr. Nails recalled that, two years ago, Staff negotiated and LakeMasters decreased their 461

price by 10%. Mr. Adams recalled a reduction of 6% or 7%. Mr. Adams confirmed Mr. Nails’ 462

comment that LakeMasters is losing good people to the construction industry. 463

In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Luby indicated that he received one resident 464

complaint regarding spikerush. Mr. Adams reported an algae blow up in Serata and on the east 465

side, due to the aggressiveness of the removal program. Mr. Tarr asked if it is time for spikerush 466

cutting. Mr. Adams advised that the spikerush reduction program commenced last spring, on the 467

east and west sides of Livingston. The contract now requires spikerush to be sprayed back. 468

469

On MOTION by Mr. Tarr and seconded by Mr. Rowe, with all 470

in favor, the LakeMasters proposal for lake and wetland 471

maintenance services, in a not-to-exceed amount of $151,140, 472

and addressing the second year option in August, 2016, were 473

approved. 474

475

476

477

478


16

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Consideration of License Agreement By 479

and Between Mediterra North 480

Community Development District, 481

Mediterra South Community 482

Development District, Mediterra 483

Community Association, Inc. for Deer 484

Population Management 485

486

This item was discussed after the Second Order of Business. 487

488

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Consideration of Resolution 2016-1, 489

Amending and Restating Resolution 99-490

11, Setting Forth a New Policy of the 491

Mediterra South Community 492

Development District Board of 493

Supervisors With Regard to the Support 494

and Legal Defense of the Board of 495

Supervisors, District Officers, and 496

District Manager and Providing for an 497

Effective Date 498

499

Mr. Nails presented Resolution 2016-1 for the Board’s consideration. This resolution 500

was an amendment to the resolution adopted in 1999. Redlined and final versions were 501

provided. 502

Ms. Wilson explained that Resolution 2016-1 revises the existing policy to provide the 503

following: 504

Updates the Board’s indemnity policy to provide procedures that must be 505

followed to ensure the provision of legal representation for the Board, District 506

officers and District Manager, in accordance with Sections 111.07 and 768.28, 507

Florida Statutes, providing for the defense of any and all civil actions, with the 508

exception of certain cases in which the Board, District officers or the District 509

Manager acted in bad faith, with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting 510

wanton and willful disregard of human rights. 511

Provides for the Board, District officers and District Manager to use an attorney 512

appointed by the Board or an attorney of their choosing and submit bills for 513

reimbursement. 514


17

Mr. Tarr asked about paying a retainer, if a Board Member chooses their own attorney. 515

Mr. Adams indicated that it is standard business practice to pay a retainer. Mr. Johnson advised 516

that, to the extent a Supervisor goes outside the scope of their authority or acts in bad faith, with 517

malicious purpose or disregard to human rights, the Supervisor must reimburse the District for 518

funds expended; otherwise, the District will have a claim against the Supervisor for failure to 519

pay. Mr. Tarr questioned if Mr. Johnson had any such cases. Mr. Johnson replied affirmatively. 520

In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Johnson estimated costs of $20,000 in legal fees, 521

depending on the nature of the case. Adopting the resolution does not form the basis of the 522

Board’s obligation to indemnify the Board Member. 523

Referring to Page 3, Paragraph 7, Mr. Tarr pointed out that the resolution states, 524

“determinations shall be made by a unanimous decision of the District’s Board of Supervisors”, 525

which is dissimilar because the Board votes by a majority. Mr. Johnson concurred, noting that 526

this is not a legal requirement and minority Board Members can vote to deny the indemnity of a 527

Board Member. 528

Mr. Johnson explained that this provides a “safety net” for all Supervisors who perform 529

in the manner that is in the best interest of the community, without concern that they may be 530

denied the right to have the best line of defense. 531

532

On MOTION by Mr. Rowe and seconded by Mr. Luby, with 533

all in favor, Resolution 2016-1, Amending and Restating 534

Resolution 99-11, Setting Forth a New Policy of the Mediterra 535

North Community Development District Board of Supervisors 536

With Regard to the Support and Legal Defense of the Board of 537

Supervisors, District Officers, and District Manager and 538

Providing for an Effective Date, was adopted. 539

540

541

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of September 2, 2015 Public 542

Hearing and Regular Meeting Minutes 543 544

Mr. Nails presented the September 2, 2015 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting Minutes 545

and asked for any additions, deletions or corrections. 546

The following change was made: 547

Line 48: Change “Row” to “Rowe” 548

549


18

On MOTION by Mr. Luby and seconded by Mr. Rowe, with 550

all in favor, the September 2, 2015 Public Hearing and Regular 551

Meeting Minutes, as amended, were approved. 552

553

554

Action Items 555

This item was not discussed. 556

557

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Other Business 558

559

Mr. Nails referred to a picture showing someone cutting the preserve. 560

Mr. Adams received an email from MCA Manager, Mr. Greg Pick, requesting permission 561

to trap wild boar. There is no season for wild boar; they breed constantly and cause excessive 562

property damage. In response to Mr. Nails’ question, Mr. Pick indicated that the enclosures are 563

on Castellano Way. Mr. Adams noted that Castellano Way is in Mediterra North but boar cross 564

boundary lines like deer. Mr. Nails asked if Staff recommended setting traps on Mediterra South 565

property. Mr. Adams confirmed that this is a localized issue. Mr. Pick pointed out that the only 566

boar issue was on the north side, where the golf course was damaged; the landscaping crew 567

foreman noted that several areas of landscaping were damaged by boar. Mr. Adams suggested 568

an ongoing management program. Mr. Rowe asked about a contract with the MCA for boar 569

management. Mr. Adams recommended MCA hiring a boar trapper. 570

Ms. Bobris noticed many beer cans and expressed concern about hunters consuming 571

alcohol in the community. 572

In response to Mr. Tarr’s question, Mr. Pick indicated that one trap was set but no boars 573

were caught. 574

Ms. Bobris voiced concern about boar trapping becoming a public relations nightmare. 575

Mr. Adams was not concerned, as boar management programs are established all over south 576

Florida. Ms. Bobris pointed out that there was no transparency, as residents were not informed 577

by the MCA or CDDs. Mr. Nails concurred; the Mediterra South Board was not aware of this 578

issue because it occurred in Mediterra North and requested that, in the future, the Board be 579

apprised. 580

Mr. Nails asked what happens with the trapped boar. Mr. Adams indicated that the boar 581

are moved off site and harvested. Mr. Nails preferred an agreement requiring the hunter to carry 582


19

insurance. Mr. Adams agreed, wondered if the landscaper’s insurance carrier would cover the 583

landscaper’s deer hunting services and suggested acknowledgement from the carrier. 584

Mr. Adams will coordinate with Staff on an agreement, including insurance coverage, 585

indemnification language and trash removal and provide the agreement at the January meeting. 586

Mr. Nails recommended taking action if there was boar damage on the Collier County 587

side. In order to take action, immediately, Mr. Adams suggested authorizing Staff to prepare an 588

agreement, the Chair to review and execute the agreement with the Board ratifying the 589

agreement at the January meeting. 590

The Board agreed. 591

592

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Staff Reports 593

594

A. Attorney 595

There being no report, the next item followed. 596

B. Engineer 597

There being nothing additional to report, the next item followed. 598

C. Manager 599

Discussion: Florida CDD Financial Regulatory Due Dates 600

***This item was an addition to the agenda.*** 601

Mr. Adams provided an updated Financial Regulatory Report, at the request of Mr. 602

Bishko. The table was rephrased to say “key activity dates” and included regulatory reporting 603

dates, as well as standard operating programs within the community, starting on October 1, 2015 604

and ending September 30, 2016. In the second column, items designated with standard operating 605

policy (SOP) are indicators of key programs, such as: 606

Canna lily cut back 607

Lake bank erosion abatement program 608

Interconnecting drainpipe inspection and cleanout 609

Lake Audit Report 610

Mr. Adams will email an updated Financial Regulatory Report to Mr. Bishko. 611

Mr. Tarr requested a column for insurance expiration dates. Mr. Adams will add the 612

column but pointed out that insurance is renewed, each year, on October 1. 613

Discussion: Crime Policy 614


20

***This item was an addition to the agenda.*** 615

Mr. Adams reported that the crime policy limit could not be increased to $2 million, as 616

the carrier will only cover up to $1 million. At Mr. Tarr’s suggestion, Mr. Adams recommended 617

revising the Rules of Procedure, so the provision is accurate. Mr. Adams pointed out that two 618

advertisements are required for the rule change process; a notice of intent of the rule change and 619

the Public Hearing, which can be advertised for the January meeting. 620

Mr. Tarr wondered why the carrier will not increase the coverage from $1 million to $2 621

million, since Wrathell, Hunt & Associates, LLC (WHA) is a reputable company. Mr. Nails 622

wanted a higher limit and suggested seeking a different insurance carrier or pushing the current 623

insurance company to seek secondary markets. Mr. Adams will speak to the insurance company. 624

In response to Mr. Nails’ question, Mr. Adams indicated that the aggregate for the 625

director and officer’s (D&O) insurance cannot be doubled and is not available at an additional 626

cost. Mr. Luby suggested increasing the coverage from $5 million to $10 million. Mr. Adams 627

recalled that the Board was comfortable with the per occurrence amount of $5 million. 628

Mr. Adams will obtain pricing for D&O coverage proposals from insurance carriers who 629

will reinsure WHA for $2 million in crime coverage and provide them at the January meeting. 630

Mr. Bishko recalled that the Interlocal Agreement was supposed to be revised to include 631

a provision on mediation. Mr. Adams confirmed that the modified language was included in the 632

agreement, upon signature. Mr. Adams will distribute the final agreement to the Board. 633

i. Approval of Unaudited Financial Statements as of August 31, 2015 634

Mr. Adams presented the Unaudited Financial Statements as of August 31, 2015. 635

636


all in favor, the Unaudited Financial Statements as of August 638

31, 2015, were approved. 639

640 641

Mr. Tarr questioned the amount of the final payment from The Club for the mediation 642

work. Mr. Adams indicated that an invoice for $22,000 was sent to the South MCA for the 643

restoration and baseline work. Additionally, the District has not received the Consent Order 644

(CO) from SFWMD, even though the settlement was signed three months ago. Mr. Adams 645

surmised that this may be because: 646

A comfort level with the Districts in self reporting 647


21

District’s moving rapidly through the preparation and implementation of a 648

restoration plan 649

Recent significant up tick to SFWMD workload 650

In response to a question, Mr. Adams confirmed that the MCA paid the District in 651

September. 652

Ms. Crismond reported that EarthBalance completed several littoral plantings of orange 653

and red canna lily. In a few months, Blue Flag Iris will be planted, which is a winter plant. 654

At Mr. Nails’ request, Ms. Crismond will email a list of lakes. 655

Ms. Crismond reported that the golf course lake bank erosion repairs were delayed 656

because of high water levels. Mr. Tim Hiers, the new golf course Superintendant, will 657

commence with the lake bank repair project, as soon as the water recedes. 658

659

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisors’ Requests 660

661

Mr. Tarr spoke to Mr. Wrathell, several months ago, about what CDDs do to reduce the 662

risk of fires in preserves and how to extinguish fires, as the Fire Department must cross the golf 663

course to reach the preserves. He pondered whether Staff should look into ways to help mitigate 664

the chance of fires in the preserves, such as controlled burns. 665

Mr. Adams explained that a controlled burn, which is performed in coordination with the 666

Fire Department and the Division of Forestry, is the most feasible way to reduce the risk of fire 667

in preserve areas. In Treviso Bay, they prepared a Prescribed Burn Plan and waited for the 668

optimal weather condition, based on the wind direction and humidity level. Mr. Adams did not 669

foresee a controlled burn for Mediterra, due to the placement of houses. Mr. Tarr was interested 670

in having an expert on this subject speak to the Board. 671

Mr. Robson reported that his Environmental Department participated in controlled burns 672

and agreed with Mr. Adams that, due to the proximity of homes to the preserve areas, a 673

prescribed burn for Mediterra is not advised. Mr. Robson explained that a controlled burn cleans 674

out excess vegetation. The District Engineer’s Ecologist will look at the layout of Mediterra and 675

discuss what is feasible at the January meeting. 676

Mr. Bishko asked that meeting materials be distributed to the Board ten days prior to each 677

meeting. Mr. Adams indicated that ten days was never the process; seven days prior was 678

standard. 679


22

Mr. Bishko requested draft minutes within 30 days of meetings, as the last set of minutes 680

were distributed late. Mr. Adams confirmed that the draft minutes, in final draft form, were 681

provided on time; the last meeting was September 2, 2015 and the draft minutes were available 682

October 1 or 2. 683

In response to Mr. Bishko’s question, Mr. Adams explained that the call-in information 684

for Board Members and Staff is not provided on each agenda because the agenda is posted on the 685

website and, if included, the public could call in to the interactive call in line. The agenda lists 686

the “listen in” number for residents. Mr. Bishko requested that the call-in information be 687

provided, by email, 24-hours prior to the meeting. 688

Mr. Adams reported that the January meeting is scheduled for January 20, 2016 at 11:00 689

a.m. and noted that the next meeting date will be included on each agenda. 690

Public Comments [3 minutes per person] 691

Public comments resumed. 692

Mr. Kumin reported that he is an Intro-medicine Specialist and research on Lime Disease 693

showed that almost all deer have ticks and the lime organism is part of the tick population. In 694

Whitetail Deer in Florida, it is rare to find a tick with the lime organism but it is not rare in the 695

north. 696

Mr. Bishko disagreed; statistics that he provided Mr. Greenberg showed that Florida had 697

71 confirmed cases of Lime Disease, which is far less than Connecticut, New Jersey or 698

Pennsylvania. 699

Ms. Bobris reported that, according to a study performed by the University of Florida, 700

one documented case of Lime Disease was in northern Florida. 701

Ms. Linda Bobris stated: 702

“What you have now is a (PR) public relations nightmare that will 703

perpetuate itself over the next 10 years. The unauthorized killing of deer was bad 704

enough but the lack of transparency is not excusable. There is no transparency. 705

Residents have always found out after the fact and only by their own 706

investigation. The rules of open government under statute 190 of Florida Law 707

makes all that you say and do a public record. Your secretive behavior and deeds 708

are now part of public record and available for all to hear and read. 709


23

You need to be pro-active and educate yourself and your audience as to 710

what the consequences of your actions are on the Mediterra Community. 711

At the last MCA and North CDD meetings it was suggested we take a step 712

back…form a subcommittee under one of the board members to look at the deer 713

issue. Stephen Wilson of London Bay Development had consulted with The 714

University of Florida, Department of Wildlife Ecology to use students from its 715

program to do headcounts, put up cameras to study and learn what we have to do 716

to take care of deer rather than just kill them. May I take this opportunity to 717

publicly thank and recognize this developer who has the best interests of 718

Mediterra at heart. 719

This is our opportunity to enhance and differentiate ourselves from other 720

communities. We must engage other groups such as the Audubon Society, The 721

Conservancy, Florida Fish and Wildlife together with the help of University of 722

Florida who were willing to commit their environmental study to students to this 723

project. This will transfer our image to one of a committed and caring 724

community. We have unique opportunity to use wildlife management to educate 725

and inform not only ourselves but also the public. 726

We could use both the CDD meetings and MCA meetings as a forum for 727

the study of wildlife and the preserves. We could add this to our activity 728

calendar: during season you could bring your guests and grandchildren to 729

lectures by the Audubon, Conservancy, Florida Fish and Wildlife and University 730

of Florida. You can elevate the image of Mediterra to one that cares and studies 731

the habitat of Southwest Florida. 2.7 billion dollars is spent by vacationers to 732

view Florida’s unique habitat and animals. Let us be a leader amongst 733

communities…and rise to the occasion to differentiate ourselves. Many of us 734

bought our homes to live with nature and raise our families in Mediterra’s unique 735

natural habitat. Let us take this opportunity to look forward and use the lands 736

and creatures that we are blessed to live with and which you are mandated to 737

protect. Elevate Mediterra to a community that educates and cares about living 738

with all that nature has provided. 739

The CDD board cannot and must not abdicate its responsibility. 740


24

As the Conservancy of Southwest Florida states it is our water, our land, 741

our wildlife, our future. Remember, the welfare of our deer is the welfare of 742

Mediterra. 743

Thank you for listening. Linda Bobris” 744

Mr. Tarr noted that the Board respects everything that Ms. Bobris accomplished but the 745

Board has never been secretive; residents are allowed to call into meetings and the meeting time 746

was changed to earlier in the day, so residents could attend. Mr. Adams, Ms. Crismond and the 747

Board are available. A nature trail through the preserve was discussed and Mr. Hiers has a 748

proposed plan and study. An election will be held next year for open seats and Mr. Tarr 749

encouraged Ms. Bobris to run for a seat and become an active part of the community. Mr. Tarr 750

hoped that the community can move forward in a positive way. 751

Mr. Nails pointed out that the Board is a public body and Board Members cannot speak 752

to one another, outside of a public meeting, about issues; everything is discussed at meetings and 753

all documents are facilitated through Mr. Adams for dissemination to the Board. All documents 754

become a public record. Mr. Nails thanked Ms. Bobris for her presentations. 755

Mr. Adams directed Ms. Bobris to the District’s website. Mr. Tarr pointed out that the 756

website has incorrect officer positions, as he is still listed as Vice Chair. 757

In response to Mr. Bishko’s question, Mr. Rowe reported that, this year, approximately 758

65” of rain was received through yesterday; at this time last year, 49” was received. He 759

reviewed the annual number of inches of rain received over the past five years. 760

761

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment 762

763

There being nothing further to discuss, the meeting adjourned. 764

765


all in favor, the meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m. 767

768

769

770

771

[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 772


25

773

774

775

776

777

778

779

780

____________________________ ____________________________ 781

Secretary/Assistant Secretary Chair/Vice Chair 782


1

ACTION ITEMS

1. 10/21/15 ACTION/AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Adams will work with Staff on a boar

management agreement, including insurance coverage, indemnification

language and provide at the January meeting for ratification. STATUS:

ONGOING

2. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will email the updated Financial

Regulatory Report to Mr. Bishko. STATUS: ONGOING

3. 10/21/15 ACTION/AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Adams will secure D&O coverage

with an aggregate of $10 million. STATUS: ONGOING

4. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will distribute the final Interlocal

Agreement to the Board. STATUS: ONGOING

5. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Crismond will email a list of the lakes receiving

littoral plantings to the Board. STATUS: ONGOING

6. 10/21/15 ACTION/AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Robson will have his Ecologist look

at the layout of Mediterra and discuss with the Board options for reduction

of wildfire fuel within the CDD preserves, at the January meeting.

STATUS: ONGOING

7. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will provide meeting materials to the

Board seven days prior to each meeting and draft minutes within 30 days

of meetings. STATUS: ONGOING

8. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will provide call-in information by email

24-hours prior to meetings. STATUS: ONGOING

9. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will include the next meeting date on

each agenda. STATUS: ONGOING

10. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Crismond met with Mr. Tim Hiers, the new golf

course Superintendant, and provided him with the golf course lake bank

areas that require repairs; she will follow up with Mr. Hiers regarding the

status of the repairs. STATUS: ONGOING


2

COMPLETED ITEMS

1. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to forward copies of the April, 2013

dissemination report to the Board. STATUS: COMPLETED

2. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Ms. Crismond will contact the residents with erosion

issues that must be addressed. STATUS: COMPLETED

3. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Bishko requested that proposals for different plants

that would better solve the erosion problem be presented. Mr. Adams

recalled discussion about installing Bacopa and photographs of the plant

will be provided at the January meeting. STATUS: COMPLETED

4. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Johnson to add a specific reference to the statutory

and rule provisions of the Commission on Ethics, F.S. 112.3143, as

discussed, to the Rules of Procedure to Section 2, Paragraph 6, of the

Rules of Procedure. STATUS: COMPLETED

5. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to attach Mr. Tarr’s documents regarding

Mr. Tarr’s opinion of the memorandum that was issued against him.

STATUS: COMPLETED

6. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Staff will continue monitoring the lake maintenance

conditions and notify the Board of any findings. STATUS: ONGOING

7. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will prepare a statement regarding aeration

activities and ask the MCA to e-blast it to the community. At the Board’s

suggestion, Mr. Adams will prepare a CDD communication to the

community reporting on various items. STATUS: COMPLETED

8. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Johnson to provide Mr. Adams with the entire

chain of information between himself and Mr. Tarr, regarding Board

membership in Club and potential conflicts of interest for Board Members,

dissemination to the Board. STATUS: COMPLETED

9. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Regarding establishing a protocol, if Board Members

continue engaging the District Engineer and District Counsel, individually,

Mr. Adams indicated that he will include this as a discussion item on the

next agenda. STATUS: COMPLETED

10. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to verify whether the MCA performed deer

reduction activities. STATUS: COMPLETED

11. 01/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams will prepare a “Do’s and Don’t’s in the

Preserves” for inclusion in the newsletter. STATUS: COMPLETED


3

COMPLETED ITEMS

12. 05/21/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to draft procedure for reporting violations

to Collier County. STATUS: COMPLETED

13. 05/21/14 ACTION ITEM: District Counsel to amend disclosure agreement, per

discussion at May 21, meeting. STATUS: COMPLETED

14. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to provide Mr. Tarr with a copy of the

insurance policy. STATUS: COMPLETED

15. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: The Reporting of Incidents of Potential Violations

procedure to be adopted by resolution, as modified, at the October

meeting, in order to memorialize the procedure. STATUS:

COMPLETED

16. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to follow up with the MCA to delete the

CDD literature from their website and replace it with a link to the CDD’s

website. STATUS: COMPLETED

17. 09/04/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to circulate the agreement for lake bank

maintenance, include it in the newsletter and post the newsletter on the

CDD website. STATUS: COMPLETED

18. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Robson to obtain a proposal for Lake #68 to

determine the current depth and compare the current depth to the designed

depth. Ms. Crismond to report the findings to Ms. Lass and the Board.

STATUS: COMPLETED

19. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: District Manager to draft a policy for engagement of

District Counsel and District Engineer, by Board Members, with requests

being made through Management, and dissemination to all Board

Members. STATUS: COMPLETED

20. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to include information discussed by Mr.

Tarr, regarding inspection report and letter from Mr. Radford, as an

attachment to the minutes in which the original report was provided. Per

Mr. Tarr’s request, Ms. Crismond to insert a date on the document.

STATUS: COMPLETED

21. 10/15/14 ACTION ITEM: Regarding the acreage listed in the recent newsletter,

Mr. Adams to adjust the verbiage to state “The District’s jurisdictional

boundaries encompass __” followed by a description of the properties and

facilities that the Districts own, including the lakes and wetlands.

STATUS: COMPLETED


4

COMPLETED ITEMS

22. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Management to review trust indenture regarding

arbitrage rebate calculations to ensure there are no specific requirements.

Once the requirement is determined, each year, during budget

deliberations, a recommendation may be made to budget for a report.

STATUS: COMPLETED

23. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Johnson to prepare an interlocal agreement for the

next meeting. STATUS: COMPLETED

24. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Staff to follow up with M.R.I. regarding inspection of

the five main outfall pipes. STATUS: COMPLETED

25. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Staff to provide a “laddered” approach proposal for

additional Directors and Officers (D&O) liability insurance coverage,

between $1 million and $5 million, for the August meeting. STATUS:

COMPLETED

26. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Adams to follow up with Ms. Carlson regarding a

fee reduction and ask if she will be reappointed to the SFWMD sub board.

STATUS: COMPLETED

27. 05/20/15 ACTION ITEM: Management to implement conservation area

restoration plan. STATUS: COMPLETED

28. 09/02/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding the Lake & Wetland Audit comment “All

Audit Check Points answered “No” require Additional

Comments/Information” Mr. Bishko requested that the question “Is there a

CDD or Club owned Aerator/Fountain present?” be reworded as the

answer would always be “No”, if the lake did not have aerators or a

fountain. STATUS: COMPLETED

29. 09/02/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding General Liability Insurance coverage limits,

Mr. Luby wanted to know if the aggregate could be changed and the cost

for coverage with the aggregate amount double the occurrence amount.

Mr. Adams will consult with the insurance agent regarding the premium

cost to change the aggregate amount. STATUS: COMPLETED

30. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Mr. Greenberg will provide insurance certificates

through the term of the License Agreement. STATUS: COMPLETED

31. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Management will revise the officer positions on the

website. STATUS: COMPLETED


5

COMPLETED ITEMS

32. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding increasing Management’s crime policy from

$1 million to $2 million by the October 1, 2015 renewal date, Mr.

Wrathell will confirm with his insurance carrier; if the Board hears

nothing additional, it can assume that Management obtained the requested

$2 million coverage. STATUS: COMPLETED

33. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Regarding the Florida CDD Financial Regulatory Due

Dates chart, Mr. Bishko wanted a column added identifying the actual or

approximate due dates, with the chart in chronological order for the

District’s fiscal year. Mr. Bishko also requested a similar chart containing

the operational due dates and/or when items are completed or performed,

such as the lake and lake maintenance audits, planting, draft minutes;

items dealing with nonfinancial items. Mr. Adams will prepare those

charts. STATUS: COMPLETED

34. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Prior to the next meeting, Resolution 2015-09 to be

modified by District Counsel, as requested, adding verbiage to other

portions of the resolution to include the District Manager. At the next

meeting, Ms. Cameron will provide the redline version to compare

Resolution 1999-11 with Resolution 2015-09. STATUS: COMPLETED

35. 10/21/15 ACTION ITEM: Going forward, draft minutes, in final draft form, will

be emailed to the Board, automatically. STATUS: COMPLETED

MEDITERRA NORTH & MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOVEMBER 30, 2015UNAUDITED

1

GeneralDebt

ServiceASSETS Cash 485,757$ -$ 485,757$ Investments

Federated 102,951 - 102,951 BB&T - cdars 100,782 - 100,782 Revenue A - 118,068 118,068 Reserve A - 885,028 885,028 Prepayment A - 2,216 2,216

Due from other governmentsMediterra North

Debt service - 2012 209 - 209 Mediterra South

General fund 5,417 - 5,417 Debt service - series 1999 48 - 48 Debt service - series 2001 22 - 22 Debt service - series 2003 3,507 - 3,507 Debt service - series 2012 9,166 - 9,166

Due from other fundsMediterra North

General fund - 99,863 99,863 Mediterra South

General fund - 171,015 171,015 Due from clearing fund 1,030 - 1,030

Total assets 708,889$ 1,276,190$ 1,985,079$

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESLiabilitiesAccounts payable -$ 9,166$ 9,166$ Due to other governments

Mediterra NorthGeneral fund 5,417 3,577 8,994

Mediterra SouthGeneral fund - 209 209

Due to other fundsMediterra North

Debt service - series 2012 99,863 - 99,863 Mediterra South

Debt service - series 2012 110,248 - 110,248 Debt service - series 2013 60,767 - 60,767

Total liabilities 276,295 12,952 289,247

Fund BalancesRestricted for:

Debt service - 1,263,238 1,263,238 Unassigned 432,594 - 432,594

Total fund balances 432,594 1,263,238 1,695,832 Total liabilities and fund balances 708,889$ 1,276,190$ 1,985,079$


COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

NOVEMBER 30, 2015

TotalGovernmental

Funds

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Governmental Funds

2

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget

REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 71,679$ 75,068$ 460,343$ 16%Special assessment: off-roll - 39,179 78,359 50%Interest and miscellaneous 9 19 1,000 2%

Total revenues 71,688 114,266 539,702 21%

EXPENDITURESAdministrativeSupervisors - 1,938 7,751 25%Management 6,375 12,750 76,500 17%Accounting services 2,550 5,100 30,600 17%Audit - - 17,000 0%Legal - - 10,000 0%Field management 1,275 2,550 15,300 17%Engineering - - 10,000 0%Trustee - - 10,000 0%Dissemination agent - - 9,106 0%Arbitrage calculation - - 1,500 0%Assessment roll preparation - - 24,000 0%Telephone 22 43 259 17%Postage 139 139 2,500 6%Insurance - 19,046 12,438 153%Printing and binding 135 269 1,615 17%Legal advertising 677 677 2,500 27%Contingencies 93 187 2,000 9%Annual District filing fee - 350 350 100%Website - - 500 0%

Total administrative 11,266 43,049 233,919 18%

Water managementOther contractual 10,603 10,603 140,000 8%Aquascaping - - 125,000 0%Lake bank stabilization - - 30,000 0%Electricity 659 659 9,000 7%Miscellaneous - - 3,000 0%Capital outlay - aeration - - 50,000 0%

Total water management 11,262 11,262 357,000 3%


COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

GENERAL FUNDS 001 & 101FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015

3

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget


COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

GENERAL FUNDS 001 & 101FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015

Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser 333 333 9,590 3%Tax collector 1,076 1,162 7,193 16%

Total other fees & charges 1,409 1,495 16,783 9%Total expenditures 23,937 55,806 607,702 9%

Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures 47,751 58,460 (68,000)

Fund balances - beginning 384,843 374,134 448,603 Fund balances - ending 432,594$ 432,594$ 380,603$

4

GeneralFund 101

Debt ServiceSeries 2012Fund 252

TotalGovernmental

FundsASSETSCash 234,065$ -$ 234,065$ Investments

Federated 31,066 - 31,066 Revenue A - 33,859 33,859 Reserve A - 363,758 363,758 Prepayment - 3 3

Due from other governmentsMediterra South

General fund 5,417 - 5,417 Debt service - series 1999 48 - 48 Debt service - series 2001 22 - 22 Debt service - series 2003 3,507 - 3,507 Debt service - series 2012 9,166 - 9,166

Due from other fundsMediterra North

General fund - 99,863 99,863 Due from clearing fund 309 - 309 Total assets 283,600$ 497,483$ 781,083$

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESLiabilitiesDue to other governments

Mediterra SouthGeneral fund -$ 209$ 209$

Due to other fundsMediterra North

Debt service - series 2012 99,863 - 99,863 Total liabilities 99,863 209 100,072

Fund balancesRestricted for:

Debt service - 497,274 497,274 Unassigned 183,737 - 183,737

Total fund balances 183,737 497,274 681,011

Total liabilities and fund balances 283,600$ 497,483$ 781,083$

MEDITERRA NORTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

BALANCE SHEET

NOVEMBER 30, 2015GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Governmental Funds

5

CurrentMonth

Yearto Date Budget

% ofBudget

REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 31,645$ 31,645$ 164,547$ 19%Interest and miscellaneous 4 9 304 3%

Total revenues 31,649 31,654 164,851 19%

EXPENDITURESAdministrativeSupervisors - 589 2,355 25%Management 1,937 3,873 23,239 17%Accounting services 775 1,549 9,296 17%Audit - - 5,164 0%Legal - - 3,038 0%Field management 387 775 4,648 17%Engineering - - 3,038 0%Trustee - - 3,038 0%Dissemination agent - - 2,766 0%Arbitrage calculation - - 456 0%Assessment roll preparation - - 7,291 0%Telephone 7 13 79 16%Postage 42 42 759 6%Insurance - 5,784 3,778 153%Printing and binding 41 82 491 17%Legal advertising 206 206 759 27%Contingencies 46 93 608 15%Annual District filing fee - 106 106 100%Website - - 152 0%

Total administrative 3,441 13,112 71,061 18%Water managementContractual services 3,221 3,221 42,529 8%Aquascaping - - 37,972 0%Lake bank stabilization - - 9,113 0%Electricity 200 200 2,734 7%Miscellaneous - - 911 0%Capital outlay - aeration - - 15,189 N/A

Total water management 3,421 3,421 108,448 3%Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser 119 119 3,428 3%Tax collector 385 415 2,571 16%Intergovernmental expense - - - N/A

Total other fees & charges 504 534 5,999 9%Total expenditures 7,366 17,067 185,508 9%



MEDITERRA NORTH

GENERAL FUND 101FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTSTATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,

AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

6

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget

REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 94,678$ 94,678$ 482,148$ 20%Interest 2 5 - N/A

Total revenues 94,680 94,683 482,148 20%

EXPENSESDebt serviceIntergovermental expenditures

Principal - - 235,000 0%Interest 123,574 123,574 247,148 50%Principal prepayment - - - N/ATotal debt service 123,574 123,574 482,148 26%

Other fees & chargesTax collector 172 172 - N/A

Total other fees & charges 172 172 - N/ATotal expenditures 123,746 123,746 482,148 26%

Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures (29,066) (29,063) -


MEDITERRA NORTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

STATEMENT OF REVENUES , EXPENDITURES,AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

DEBT SERVICE FUND 252 - SERIES 2012 (REFUNDED 2001 BONDS)FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015

7

Mediterra North Community Development District Series 2012 $6,025,000

Debt Service Schedule

Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I05/01/2015 -$ - -$ -$ 11/01/2015 - - 123,573.75 123,573.7505/01/2016 235,000.00 3.400% 123,573.75 358,573.7511/01/2016 - - 119,578.75 119,578.7505/01/2017 245,000.00 3.600% 119,578.75 364,578.7511/01/2017 - - 115,168.75 115,168.7505/01/2018 255,000.00 3.800% 115,168.75 370,168.7511/01/2018 - - 110,323.75 110,323.7505/01/2019 265,000.00 4.000% 110,323.75 375,323.7511/01/2019 - - 105,023.75 105,023.7505/01/2020 275,000.00 4.200% 105,023.75 380,023.7511/01/2020 - - 99,248.75 99,248.7505/01/2021 290,000.00 4.400% 99,248.75 389,248.7511/01/2021 - - 92,868.75 92,868.7505/01/2022 300,000.00 4.500% 92,868.75 392,868.7511/01/2022 - - 86,118.75 86,118.7505/01/2023 315,000.00 4.650% 86,118.75 401,118.7511/01/2023 - - 78,795.00 78,795.0005/01/2024 330,000.00 5.100% 78,795.00 408,795.0011/01/2024 - - 70,380.00 70,380.0005/01/2025 350,000.00 5.100% 70,380.00 420,380.0011/01/2025 - - 61,455.00 61,455.0005/01/2026 365,000.00 5.100% 61,455.00 426,455.0011/01/2026 - - 52,147.50 52,147.5005/01/2027 385,000.00 5.100% 52,147.50 437,147.5011/01/2027 - - 42,330.00 42,330.0005/01/2028 405,000.00 5.100% 42,330.00 447,330.0011/01/2028 - - 32,002.50 32,002.5005/01/2029 425,000.00 5.100% 32,002.50 457,002.5011/01/2029 - - 21,165.00 21,165.0005/01/2030 450,000.00 5.100% 21,165.00 471,165.0011/01/2030 - - 9,690.00 9,690.0005/01/2031 380,000.00 5.100% 9,690.00 389,690.00

Total $5,270,000.00 - $2,439,740.00 $7,709,740.00

8

General001



TotalGovernmental

FundsASSETSCash 251,692$ -$ -$ 251,692$ Investments

Federated 71,885 - - 71,885 BB&T - cdars 100,782 - - 100,782 Revenue A - 63,627 20,582 84,209 Reserve A - 446,270 75,000 521,270 Prepayment - 2,213 - 2,213

Due from other governmentsMediterra North

Debt service - 2012 209 - - 209 Due from other funds

Mediterra SouthGeneral - 110,248 60,767 171,015

Due from clearing fund 721 - - 721 Total assets 425,289$ 622,358$ 156,349$ 1,203,996$

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCESLiabilitiesAccounts payable -$ 9,166$ -$ 9,166$ Due to other governments

Mediterra NorthGeneral fund 5,417 70 3,507 8,994

Due to other fundsMediterra South

Debt service - series 2012 110,248 - - 110,248 Debt service - series 2013 60,767 - - 60,767

Total liabilities 176,432 9,236 3,507 189,175

Fund balancesRestricted for:

Debt service - 613,122 152,842 765,964 Unassigned 248,857 - - 248,857

Total fund balances 248,857 613,122 152,842 1,014,821

Total liabilities & fund balances 425,289$ 622,358$ 156,349$ 1,203,996$

Governmental Funds

MEDITERRA SOUTHCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

BALANCE SHEETGOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

NOVEMBER 30, 2015

9

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget

REVENUESpecial assessment: on roll 40,034$ 43,423$ 295,796$ 15%Special assessment: off-roll - 39,179 78,359 50%Interest and miscellaneous 5 10 696 1%

Total revenues 40,039 82,612 374,851 22%

EXPENDITURESAdministrativeSupervisors - 1,349 5,396 25%Management 4,438 8,877 53,261 17%Accounting 1,775 3,551 21,304 17%Audit - - 11,836 0%Legal - - 6,962 0%Field management 888 1,775 10,652 17%Engineering - - 6,962 0%Trustee - - 6,962 0%Dissemination agent - - 6,340 0%Arbitrage calculation - - 1,044 0%Assessment roll preparation - - 16,709 0%Telephone 15 30 180 17%Postage 97 97 1,741 6%Insurance - 13,262 8,660 153%Printing and binding 94 187 1,124 17%Legal advertising 471 471 1,741 27%Contingencies 47 94 1,392 7%Annual District filing fee - 244 244 100%Website - - 348 0%

Total administrative 7,825 29,937 162,858 18%Water managementContractual services 7,382 7,382 97,471 8%Aquascaping - - 87,028 0%Lake bank stabilization - - 20,887 0%Electricity 459 459 6,266 7%Miscellaneous - - 2,089 0%Capital outlay - aeration - - 34,811 N/A

Total water management 7,841 7,841 248,552 3%




10

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget




Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser 214 214 6,162 3%Tax collector 691 747 4,622 16%

Total other fees & charges 905 961 10,784 9%Total expenditures 16,571 38,739 422,194 9%



11

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget

REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 84,072$ 91,189$ 627,796$ 15%Assessment prepayments - - - N/AInterest 3 7 - N/A

Total revenues 84,075 91,196 627,796 15%

EXPENDITURESDebt servicePrincipal - - 295,000 0%Prepayment B 10,000 10,000 - N/AInterest 154,954 154,954 309,908 50%

Total debt service 164,954 164,954 604,908 27%

Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser - - 13,079 0%Tax collector 1,385 1,503 9,809 15%

Total other fees & charges 1,385 1,503 22,888 7%Total expenditures 166,339 166,457 627,796 27%

Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures (82,264) (75,261) -




DEBT SERVICE FUND 210 - SERIES 2012 (REFUNDED 1999 & 2001 BONDS)FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015

12

Mediterra South Community Development District Series 2012 $7,430,000

Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I

05/01/2015 - - - -11/01/2015 - - 154,953.75 154,953.7505/01/2016 295,000.00 3.400% 154,953.75 449,953.7511/01/2016 - - 149,938.75 149,938.7505/01/2017 305,000.00 3.600% 149,938.75 454,938.7511/01/2017 - - 144,448.75 144,448.7505/01/2018 310,000.00 3.800% 144,448.75 454,448.7511/01/2018 - - 138,558.75 138,558.7505/01/2019 325,000.00 4.000% 138,558.75 463,558.7511/01/2019 - - 132,058.75 132,058.7505/01/2020 340,000.00 4.200% 132,058.75 472,058.7511/01/2020 - - 124,918.75 124,918.7505/01/2021 355,000.00 4.400% 124,918.75 479,918.7511/01/2021 - - 117,108.75 117,108.7505/01/2022 370,000.00 4.500% 117,108.75 487,108.7511/01/2022 - - 108,783.75 108,783.7505/01/2023 385,000.00 4.650% 108,783.75 493,783.7511/01/2023 - - 99,832.50 99,832.5005/01/2024 405,000.00 5.100% 99,832.50 504,832.5011/01/2024 - - 89,505.00 89,505.0005/01/2025 430,000.00 5.100% 89,505.00 519,505.0011/01/2025 - - 78,540.00 78,540.0005/01/2026 450,000.00 5.100% 78,540.00 528,540.0011/01/2026 - - 67,065.00 67,065.0005/01/2027 475,000.00 5.100% 67,065.00 542,065.0011/01/2027 - - 54,952.50 54,952.5005/01/2028 500,000.00 5.100% 54,952.50 554,952.5011/01/2028 - - 42,202.50 42,202.5005/01/2029 525,000.00 5.100% 42,202.50 567,202.5011/01/2029 - - 28,815.00 28,815.0005/01/2030 555,000.00 5.100% 28,815.00 583,815.0011/01/2030 - - 14,662.50 14,662.5005/01/2031 575,000.00 5.100% 14,662.50 589,662.50

Total $6,600,000.00 - $3,092,690.00 $9,692,690.00

13

CurrentMonth

Year toDate Budget

% ofBudget

REVENUESSpecial assessment: on roll 43,122$ 46,773$ 319,781$ 15%Interest 1 2 - N/A

Total revenues 43,123 46,775 319,781 15%

EXPENDITURESDebt servicePrincipal - - 130,000 0%Interest 88,272 88,272 176,544 50%

Total debt service 88,272 88,272 306,544 29%

Other fees & chargesProperty appraiser - - 4,997 0%Tax collector 941 1,021 6,662 15%

Total other fees & charges 941 1,021 11,659 9%Total expenditures 89,213 89,293 318,203 28%

Excess/(deficiency) of revenuesover/(under) expenditures (46,090) (42,518) 1,578




DEBT SERVICE FUND 204 - SERIES 2013 (REFUNDED 2003A BONDS)FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015

14

Mediterra South Community Development District Series 2013

Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I

11/01/2015 88,271.88 88,271.8805/01/2016 130,000.00 0.041% 88,271.88 218,271.8811/01/2016 85,590.63 85,590.6305/01/2017 135,000.00 0.041% 85,590.63 220,590.6311/01/2017 82,806.25 82,806.2505/01/2018 145,000.00 0.041% 82,806.25 227,806.2511/01/2018 79,815.63 79,815.6305/01/2019 145,000.00 0.041% 79,815.63 224,815.6311/01/2019 76,825.00 76,825.0005/01/2020 155,000.00 0.041% 76,825.00 231,825.0011/01/2020 73,628.13 73,628.1305/01/2021 160,000.00 0.041% 73,628.13 233,628.1311/01/2021 70,328.13 70,328.1305/01/2022 170,000.00 0.041% 70,328.13 240,328.1311/01/2022 66,821.88 66,821.8805/01/2023 175,000.00 0.041% 66,821.88 241,821.8811/01/2023 63,212.50 63,212.5005/01/2024 180,000.00 0.041% 63,212.50 243,212.5011/01/2024 59,500.00 59,500.0005/01/2025 185,000.00 0.050% 59,500.00 244,500.0011/01/2025 54,875.00 54,875.0005/01/2026 200,000.00 0.050% 54,875.00 254,875.0011/01/2026 49,875.00 49,875.0005/01/2027 210,000.00 0.050% 49,875.00 259,875.0011/01/2027 44,625.00 44,625.0005/01/2028 220,000.00 0.050% 44,625.00 264,625.0011/01/2028 39,125.00 39,125.0005/01/2029 230,000.00 0.050% 39,125.00 269,125.0011/01/2029 33,375.00 33,375.0005/01/2030 245,000.00 0.050% 33,375.00 278,375.0011/01/2030 27,250.00 27,250.0005/01/2031 255,000.00 0.050% 27,250.00 282,250.0011/01/2031 20,875.00 20,875.0005/01/2032 270,000.00 0.050% 20,875.00 290,875.0011/01/2032 14,125.00 14,125.0005/01/2033 285,000.00 0.050% 14,125.00 299,125.0011/01/2033 7,000.00 7,000.0005/01/2034 280,000.00 0.050% 7,000.00 287,000.00

Total $3,775,000.00 - $2,075,850.06 $5,850,850.06

$4,030,000

Documents

MEDITERRA SOUTHmediterracdds.net/_assets/documents/fy-2016/2016-01-20-MSCDD... · Mediterra South Community Development District 2300 Glades Road, ... 29 Colleen Kvetko Resident 30