I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
.47328
INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY REPORT
ON THE
RED ROCK EAST GRID
SCADDING TOWNSHIP
DISTRICT OF SUDBURY
ONTARIO
FOR
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
Prepared by:
Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd .
L.D.S. Winter, P.Geo.
28 October 2010
____j
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Property Description and Location
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure
and Physiography
Geological Setting
4.1 Regional Geology
4.2 Local and Property Geology
4.3 Mineralization
Work Done
5.1 Induced Polarization Survey
Results
Summary and Conclusions
Recommendations
Personnel
References
Certificate of Qualification
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Table of Geological Formations Stratigraphy of the Huronian Supergroup Table 2:
Table 3:
Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: Figure 7:
Red Rock East Property, Zones of Anomalous Chargeability
LIST OF FIGURES
Location Map Property Map - Claims and Red Rock East Grid Regional Geology Property Area Geology Red Rock East Property Grid Plan of Chargeability Values; n = 2 Plan of Resistivity Values; n = 2
PAGE
3
3
3
5
5
8
8
10
10
11
14
14
15
15
17
6 7
12
2
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1. INTRODUCTION
Trueclaim Exploration Inc. ("Trueclaim" or the "Company") holds a group of
claims in Scadding township, District of Sudbury, Sudbury Mining Division, Ontario
(Figure 1 ). The Property was acquired for its potential to host gold and/or platinum
group metals (PGM) concentrations of economic significance.
The Company carried out line cutting followed by an induced polarization survey
by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd. on the Red Rock East Grid (9.0 km) which is located on
the northwest corner of Ashigami Lake and within claim 4229046. The following report
describes the property, its geological setting and the work carried out on the Red Rock
East grid and the results obtained. The IP survey was done during the period 12
October and 16 October 2010.
2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The Property is located in Scadding Township between Wanapitei and Ashigarni
Lakes approximately 50 km northeast of Sudbury, Ontario at 46°-38'N latitude, 80°-37'W
longitude (UTM co-ordinates Zone 17, 529130mE and 5176250mN (Figure 1 ). The
Property is centred at Concession II and Ill, Lots 5 and 6 of Scadding Township with the
Property being within the Sudbury Mining Division and the District of Sudbury, Ontario.
The work described in this report was carried out on claim 4229046 and the Red
Rock East Grid (Figure 2).
3. ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE. LOCAL RESOURCES,
INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
Access to the Property is by way of the Kukagami Lake road from the
intersection of Ontario Highway 17 approximately 20 km west of the village of Hagar and
30 km east of the City of Sudbury. The Kukagami Lake road crosses the Property 16.8
km north of Highway 17 and from here, a network of old mine roads and trails provide
access to the central part of the Property (Figure 3).
3
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I
SCAD-FIG.t.DWG AUG./08
0 20km
SCALE
/~ /, Wanapitei ~
C,~~ Lake j \ (
\/'J v
FIGURE 1
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC. SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY
RED ROCK EAST GRID LOCATION MAP
October 2010
I I I I I I
5 1
8 ,.., -~~ .
5 16087
i.' I
,p l 3019aif
i
-- 1 i
• I
1----.1111~·----•. ~ . i i
! • I
I 4229047 . r. . . i
I I I I I I I I I I
0
i • 550!~03 i
I
I 5357988 j
I··
5359359
• 4p9046
. ·--
•
"- . ' } ":
··--.
-·'
·----·~ l: Cl
·LOT 5, .0
. 6188
. Lrr ..
FIGURE 2 TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID
CLAIM/GRID MAP
4209055
,_ .,.· (:. ,.
Scale: 1:20 000 October 2010 After Scadding Township Claim Map G-3056
-------------------
LEGEND
FIGURE 3 TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID REGIONAL GEOLOGY
October 2010
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
The Sudbury area has a cold continental climate with an average annual
precipitation in the order of 85 em per year and with the annual temperature being in the
range from +30°C to -40°C. Snow accumulations are generally present for a 5 month
period between November and March with the occasional storm in early April. In
general, the climatic conditions permit exploration work to be carried out at all times
during the year. In some cases, the winter season is more preferable for carrying out
geophysical and drilling work in that it provides access to swampy areas.
The Property is covered with secondary growth of poplar, birch, spruce and alder
which represent second growth following the harvesting of white pine during the early
part of the 201h Century. Forest fires from time to time have also contributed to the
destruction of the pine forest. There is currently little merchanable timber in the area.
Wanapitei Lake, Kukagami Lake and Ashigami Lake all host cottages and private resorts
which are used during both the summer and winter periods for recreational purposes.
Infrastructure and site services for the Property were removed during the
reclamation and remediation programs in the 1980's, however, single phase power and
telephone services follow the Kukagami Lake road to Kukagami Lodge on Kukagami
Lake north of the Property. The city of Sudbury approximately 30 km west of the project
is a well established mining area and can provide all of the services and skilled
personnel required for any type of exploration work and mining facilities that may be
developed on the Property.
The topographic relief of the Property is in the order of 20 m with the general
elevation of the Property being approximately 300 m above mean sea level. For the
most part, the Property is forested with approximately 25% of the area being muskeg.
Approximately 90% of the area is covered by glacial deposits and approximately 10% is
considered to be bedrock exposures which generally occur in an east-west trend
reflecting the general trend of the underlying Huronian sediments.
4
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
4. GEOLOGICAL SETTING
4.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Scadding Property area lies within the Precambrian Canadian Shield of
Northern Ontario, within the Southern Geological Province between the Superior
Geological Province to the north and the Grenville Geological Province to the south.
In summary, three major lithological components are present in the Southern
Province:
• An Archean basement made up of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks,
granitoid intrusives and mafic intrusive rocks,
• Huronian metasedimentary rocks containing minor intercalated mafic volcanic
rocks, overlie the Archean basement and,
• Post-Huronian intrusive rocks including Nipissing diabase sills and post Nipissing
diabase dykes and sills, small felsic intrusive bodies and lamprophyre dykes.
The major geological provinces and structures within the region are outlined in
Table 1 and in Figure 3.
5
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE 1 TABLE OF GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.- SCADDING GOLD PRO .. IECT AREA
Period
Mid-Proterozoic
Mid-Proterozoic
Early Proterozoic
Early Proterozoic
Early Proterozoic
Archean
Province or Complex
Grenville
Keweenawan
Sudbury Igneous Complex and Whitewater Sediments
Nipissing Diabase
Huronian Supergroup
Superior
Dominant Lithology
Variable, highly metamorphosed
Mafic Volcanics
Diorite
Gabbro and Diabase Intrusions
Clastic Sediments
Granite and Meta volcanics
Age Millions of Years (Ma)
1200- 1000
1225
1850
2115
2450-2115
>2500
The Huronian metasedimentary rocks lie unconformably above the Archean
basement. They are part of the Huronian Supergroup, portions of which extend across
the region from Sault Ste. Marie in the west to the Cobalt Area near the Quebec border
in the east. The Huronian sediments are interpreted to have been deposited during a
period of marine transgression from south to north, commencing with sandstones,
conglomerates and argillites with local intercalated mafic volcanics followed by more
mature clastic sediments and marine evaporates. The sediments are thought to have
been deposited from the northwest towards the southeast, with the clastic material
derived from gradual uplift of the foreland to the north. The unconformity with the
basement rocks is sharply defined in some places and at others is represented by
several metres of regolith.
The Huronian Supergroup has been divided into four groups, each containing
several formations (Table 2).
6
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
TABLE 2 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE HURONIAN SUPERGROUP SAULT STE. MARIE - SUDBURY- COBALT REGION
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.- SCADDING GOLD PROJECT AREA
Formation
COBALT GROUP
BAR RIVER FORMATION
GORDON RIVER FORMATION
LORRAIN FORMATION
GOWGANDA FORMATION
QUIRKE LAKE GROUP
SERPENT FORMATION
ESPANOLA FORMATION
BRUCE FORMATION
HOUGH LAKE GROUP
MISSISSAGI FORMATION
PECORS FORMATION
RAMSAY LAKE FORMATION
ELLIOT LAKE GROUP
McKIM FORMATION
MATINENDA FORMATION
LIVINGSTONE CREEK FORMATION
Description
Orthoquartzite, siltstone
Siltstone
Arkose, orthoquartzite
Polymictic Conglomerate, quartzite,
siltstone, argillite
Orthoquartzite
Greywacke, limestone
Limestone, siltstone
Orthoquartzite
Greywacke, argillite, quartzite
Polymictic conglomerate
Greywacke, argillite, quartzite
Polymictic conglomerate
Arkosic quartzite
Feldspathic quartzite and conglomerates
The primary intrusive event affecting the region was the intrusion of the Nipissing
diabase sills and dykes which are dated at 2120 Ma. The sills and dykes have been
folded during the Penokean Orogeny and have been metamorphosed to greenschist
facies. The Nipissing diabase is primarily found as intrusions in the Huronian sediments,
however, they also occur in the underlying Archean rocks.
7
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
The major structural event that deformed the Huronian sediments was the
Penokean Orogeny, which affected the region between about 1850 Ma and 1750 Ma.
The deformation caused by the Penokean Orogeny resulted in folding and thrust faulting
of the Huronian sediments. The Murray fault system and Onaping fault systems are
composed predominantly of strike-slip faults that were formed some time after the
Grenville Orogeny (post 1000 Ma).
4.2 LOCAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The Cobalt, Quirke Lake and Hough Lake groups of the Huronian Supergroup
(Table 2) are exposed south of Wanapitei Lake in a series of northwest to southeast
oriented secondary fold structures which are truncated at the Grenville Front Tectonic
Zone a few kilometres south of the Property. Generally, the stratigraphic sequence
becomes younger in the northeast. Fold structures, including northwest-southeast
trending dykes and sills of the Nipissing suite, are overturned to the southwest and
disrupted by both northwesterly and northeasterly striking faults. Both Huronian
sediments and Nipissing intrusions were regionally metamorphosed under greenschist to
lower amphibolite facies conditions.
The Property is mainly underlain by the Mississagi formation of the Hough Lake
group, the Serpent, Espanola and Bruce formations of the Quirke Lake group, the
Gowganda formation of the Cobalt group and lesser dykes and sills of the Nipissing
intrusive suite (Figure 4). Metasedimentary strata strike approximately west and dip
moderately to steeply north in the area of historical interest. Here, metasediments are
cut by a swarm of relatively narrow mafic dykes, thought to be part of the Nipissing suite,
which strike northwesterly and dip -65° to vertically.
4.3 MINERALIZATION
Gold mineralization occurs with chlorite and iron sulphides in hydrothermal
breccia at various stratigraphic levels and in particular within the Serpent Formation.
The Serpent Formation is thought to be about 450 m thick but the top of the formation is
everywhere an erosion surface. The Serpent Formation is mainly composed of
resistant, buff weathering and massive-looking, siliceous clastic metasediments. Thickly
8
\ ' '
' '
\ lrh', (-3\ ' _,_, ' '· ... _ ....
LEGEND PROTEROZOIC
POST-HURONIAN
' '
_)
',,
Micropegmatite (granophyre).
8 Norite.
D Gabbro.
INTRUSIVE CONTACT
HURONIAN
COBALT GROUP
GOWGANDA FORMATION
,, ,_,
Co_] Conglomerate (lOa); argillite (lOb); quartzite (tOe); limestone (10d); inter· bedded conglomerate, argillite, and quartzite (tOe.
UNCONFORMITY
BRUCE GROUP
MISSISSAGI FORMATION
Quartzite; quarlz·pebble conglomerate, generally radioactive (9a); polymictic conglomerate (9b).
GREAT UNCONFORMITY
PRE-HURONIAN
-- --
I I I I I \
III',
II
I I
- - -
Red Rock East Grid Claim 4229046
- -
FIGURE 4 TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID PROPERTY GEOLOGY
- -
October 2010 Scale: 1:31 680 After Ont. Dept. Mines Map 2009 Maclennan and Scadding Townships
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
bedded, light grey, medium grained, muscovite-plagioclase-quartz, feldspathic quartzite
is the dominant rock type. A more thinly bedded and more argillaceous unit about 30 m
thick and consisting of metagraywacke, metasiltstone and meta-conglomerate occurs at
the basal contact with the Espanola limestone.
Resistant weathering, grey, pink and green breccias in the Central (Intermediate)
Zone show a crude concentric zoning pattern which is related to the intensity of
fracturing and hydrothermal alteration of "Serpent quartzite". Gold mineralization is
mainly contained in highly chloritic shear zones and highly chloritic breccias next to the
shear zones. Chloritic shears in the Central (Intermediate) Zone trend 330°-340°, dip
70° east and form a low angle with respect to the strike of local mafic dykes.
Chloritic wallrocks are coarse, angular, dark green coloured breccias containing
70% chlorite and greater than 5% sulphide minerals (pyrite > pyrrhotite > chalcopyrite >
arsenopyrite). Magnetite, galena and apatite are present as accessory minerals (Martins
et al., 1979). The gold content of dark green breccias containing sulphides was
commonly greater than 0.2 ounces gold per ton.
Pink coloured breccia with stringers and matrix material consisting of coarse
dolomite +grey quartz +/-(chlorite, albite, sulphides) make up an intermediate zone of
alteration. The pink breccias are coloured by ferric iron oxides and contain abundant
albite. Pink breccia contains gold mineralization in proportion to chlorite and sulphide
content. Values in the range 0.04 to 0.10 ounces gold per ton were commonly found in
pink breccia mined underground from the Central (Intermediate) Zone.
An outer zone of alteration is seen as a transition from pink coloured rocks to
light grey coloured, crackle brecciated and net-veined metasediments containing
dispersed rusty weathering spots and patches after sulphides in fractures.
Schandl et al (1994) dated the breccias at 1700 ± 2 Ma using U-Pb
geochronology on hydrothermal monazite found in albitic alteration at the Scadding mine
site. Although no occurrences of dyke material within breccia are documented in the
mines area, the breccia as dated is younger than intrusions of the Nipissing suite. Gold
mineralization in the mine area appears to be one of the youngest events since it is
9
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
associated with chloritic shear zones and chloritic alteration which cut and overprint,
respectively, both the breccia and the dykes.
The extent of hydrothermal breccia at the Scadding Property is unknown but may
be considerable. Known gold mineralization on the Property occurs within an area 500
m square and includes the North, Central, South, New and East-West Zones. The
North, Central (Intermediate) and South Zones are aligned along a northwesterly to
northerly trend similar to a strike of 330°-340° documented for mineralization in the
Central (Intermediate) Zone. Most diamond drilling between 1973 and 1983 was along
this trend.
The tops of the North, South and East-West Zones were mined as shallow, open
pits to depths of 7 m to 9 m. Underground development and mining of the Central
(Intermediate) Zone was within a block of ground 50 m square and 95 m high. About
80% of the total tonnage mined from the Property came from underground.
5. WORKDONE
5.1 INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
A total of 9.0 km of induced polarization readings were taken on the Red Rock
East Grid with an "a" spacing of 25 m and with 6 levels being read (N = 6) (Figure 5).
The IP survey was a time domain pole-dipole survey and it was carried out with a Walcer
9000 transmitter in combination with a Honda 18 HP motor generator and a Scintrex
IPR-12 receiver. The motor generator and transmitter were stationary on the end of the
line being read with the current being transmitted through a wire with an electrode into
the ground for contact. A second wire and electrode (the live electrode) was moved
along the line being surveyed as per the survey protocol. At all times, the transmitter
man, live electrode man and receiver personnel were in radio contact. Ahead of the live
current electrode was a crew of men with electrodes at 25 m intervals. These electrodes
are connected to the receiver where the receiver operator obtains and records the
readings. The data is downloaded from the receiver at the end of the day to a computer
where the resistivity and chargeability are calculated and plotted using pseudosections
and/or maps using Geosoft software.
10
- - - - - - - - -w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 U') 0 Lt) + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0 T"'" T"'" t\1 t\1 (f) (f) -.::1" -.::1" Lt) Lt) _J _J __. __. _J __. __. __. _J __. _J __.
Stations located at 25m intervals with pickets using metal tags.
-w 0 0 + cc _J
-------N ast.
Red Rock East Property
UTM Zone 17T co-ordinates shown in NAD 83 co-ordinates
BL @ LO+OOE; 530350mE, 5168200mN BL @ L6+00E; 530950mE; 5168200mN
FIGURE 5 TRUE CLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID
October 2010 Scale: 1:5000
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
The IP survey was carried out by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd., Massey, Ontario
an experienced geophysical contractor. The survey personnel are listed in Section 9.
The IP was performed between 12 October and 16 October 2010 (inclusive).
6. RESULTS
A total of 9.0 line-km were surveyed during the IP survey with the results for each
pseudosection summarized in Table 3. Pseudosections on lines spaced at 50 m for the
lines from O+OOE to 6+00E are provided in the pockets of the report (13
pseudosections). Figure 6 is a plan map, at n = 2 compiled from the pseudosections
showing the location of and the trends of the main zones of increased chargeability.
Figure 7 is the corresponding resistivity map.
In general the background chargeability values range from <0 mVN to 1 mVN to
5 mVN. Zones of increased chargeabilities range up to a maximum of 35 mVN,
however, most anomalous values are in the 2-10 mVN range i.e., the areas of increased
chargeability are in the order of 2 x to 6 x background.
The areas of increased chargeability appear to occur in two zones. A southern
zone present in the southeast corner of the grid at L6+00E; 1 +25S to beyond 3+00S
extends on a west-northwest trend to L3+00E following which there is a break for about
150 m and then it continues across lines 1 +OOE, 0+50E and O+OOE to the western edge
of the grid. This is a broad zone of increased chargeabilities up to 35 mVN and with low
resistivities. The second zone in the grid occurs from L3+00E to LO+OOE at the northern
ends of the lines. Here the maximum chargeability is 9 and the zone has increased
resistivity values associated with it.
II
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
LINE
O+OOE
0+50E
1+00E
1+50E
2+00E
TABLE 3 RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC. ZONES OF ANOMALOUS CHARGEABILITY
CHARGEABILITY VALUES STATION BACKGROUND ANOMALY
mVN mVN
1+00S to 1 to 4 4 to 8
0+25N
1+00S to 0+65N
<0 to 3 3 to 5
2+00N to 2+35N (end of line)
<0 to 3 3 to 5
1+75S to <0 to 3 3 to 6
0+25N
1+75N to end of line at 2+30N
<0 to 3 3 to 9
2+80S <0 to 1 1 to 5
at end of line
1+00S to 2+00S
<0 to 1 1 to 2
1 +60N to 2+35N (end of line)
<0 to 1 1 to 9
2+80S <0 to 2 2 to 5
at end of line
2+00S to 1+30S
<0 to 2 2 to 5
COMMENTS
Approximately 125 m wide, weak chargeability zone with central core of higher chargeability. Associated resistivity increase. Apparent dip to south.
Broad, weak chargeability zone (approximately 165m) with central core at O+OON of increased chargeability. Associated higher resistivity.
Weak, broad zone below n = 2 with associated higher resistivity.
Weak, broad chargeability zone approximately 200 m wide with apparent slope to north and with apparent south dipping internal zones. Associated higher resistivity.
Weak to moderate broad chargeability zone with associated higher resistivity.
Zone at end of line with associated low resistivity.
Broad, weak chargeability zone with dip to north with associated low resistivity.
Broad, weak to moderate chargeability zone with associated high resistivity.
Zone at end of line with associated low resistivity.
70 m wide, weak chargeability zone with apparent dip to north and mixed resistivity.
12
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
2+50E
3+00E
3+50E
4+00E
4+50E
5+00E
5+50E
6+00E
0+80N to 2+1 ON (end of line)
2+40S to 1+20S
0+ ?ON to 2+30N at end of line
2+25S (at end of line) to
0+90S
1 +1 ON to 2+30N at end of line
2+30S to 0+60S
2+00N to 2+30N at end of line
2+50S to 0+40S
2+40S to 1+00S
2+60S at end of line to
0+60S
2+60S at end of line to
1+50S
2+60S at end of line to
1+60S
1+70S to 0+10N
Broad, weak to moderate <0 to 2 2 to 8 chargeability zone with
associated high resistivity.
Broad, wide to moderate
0 to 3 3 to 8 chargeability zone below n = 3 (about 50 m depth) with associated low resistivity.
Broad, weak chargeability <0 to 3 3 to 6 zone with associated high
resistivity.
Broad, weak to moderate
<0 to 4 4 to 10 chargeability zone with strongest values to south at 2+00S.
Weak, broad chargeability <0 to 4 4 to 5 zone with associated higher
resistivity values.
Broad, weak to moderate chargeability zone with two
<0 to 4 4 to 27 south-dipping zones of high chargeability values with associated weak resistivity.
Weak chargeability zone at <0 to 4 4 to 5 north end of line with high
resistivity.
Broad zone of moderate to <0 to 5 5 to 23 strong chargeability with
associated low resistivity.
Broad zone of moderate to 0 to 5 5 to 26 strong chargeability with
associated low resistivity.
Broad zone of moderate to <0 to 5 5 to 30 strong chargeability with
associated low resistivity.
Broad zone of moderate to <0 to 4 4 to 35 strong chargeability with
associated low resistivity.
Broad zone of moderate to <0 to 4 4 to 31 strong chargeability with
associated low resistivity.
Broad, weak chargeability <0 to 3 3 to 6 zone with associated low
resistivity.
13
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.---- -ro __ _ _ _ _ ....:.1.:;..:oo'---------=2o;:..:::o _____ ~3o~o_ 400 ~ -- - - - ,- -· - --
0 o -
~~
0.
g -I
0 0 "':'
g . L .... ~· ---
0 100 200 300 -400
500
500
600 I
··*O
. g
' 600
1
0 0 0
.()
.()
-1
-1
-1 I FULL COL;R SCALE BAR- ~
CHARGEABILITY CONTOURED@ 5
Scale 1 :2500
-----l
%$ 0 2S ~0 75 100 125 150 175 iZiZiiL . - -'
metre.$
FIGURE 6
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC. RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
CALCULATED CHARGEABiliTY Mx 590-820
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The IP survey has identified two zones of increased chargeability values. The
southern zone extends in a west-northwest direction from the southeast part of the grid
(L6+00E) to the western edge of the grid (LO+OOE), however, there is a break in the
zone for about 150 m between 1 +25E and 2+ 75E. The zone is about 200 m wide in the
east and narrows to about 125 m wide to the west. The zone shows low resistivity and
is probably due to the presence of disseminated sulphides(?).
The second or northerly zone is present from L3+50E to LO+OO in the
northwestern part of the grid, trends east-west and extends off the grid to the north.
Chargeability values reach a maximum of 9 mVN and may be due to small amounts of
disseminated sulphides. This zone has associated high resistivity values.
The area of the grid is underlain by conglomerates, argillites and quartzites of the
Gowganda formation. The chargeability anomalies are considered to be due to
disseminated sulphides. If this is the case they may be present as disseminated grains
in the sediments or in cross-cutting structures/shears.
8. RECOMMENDATIONS
The zones of increased chargeability may contain zones of disseminated
sulphides of economic interest. To evaluate this potential a program of prospecting,
geological mapping followed by stripping and sampling in the area of the two IP
anomalies is recommended. Drilling of the zones could follow if the results of the earlier
work are positive.
14
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
9. PERSONNEL
The surveys were carried out by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd., Massey, Ontario
using the following personnel.
Mike Faulkner, Walford, Ontario
Gab Roy, Elliot Lake, Ontario
Mike Whalen, Walford, Ontario
Bronson Ede, Sudbury, Ontario
Andy Desjardins, Espanola, Ontario
Tyler Gagan, Espanola, Ontario
Cliff Moffatt, Sudbury, Ontario
Matt Mandigo, Massey, Ontario
Brent Patrie, Val Therese, Ontario
Jim Patrie, Massey, Ontario.
10. REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
There is a library of the internal reports, maps and drawings for the period 1973 to 1990 held by Paul C. Mclean, South River, Ontario.
Card, K.D. and Pattison, E.F., 1973 Nipissing diabase of the Southern Province, Ontario; in Huronian Stratigraphy and Sedimentation, ed. G.M. Young, Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper Number 12, pp. 7-30.
Collins, W.H., 1913 Geology of a portion of the Sudbury map-area south of Wanapitei Lake, Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada Summary Report.
Collins, W.H., 1914 Wanapitei Sheet, Map 124A; Geological Survey of Canada.
Dressler, B.O., 1980 Geology of the Wanapitei Lake Area, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey, Open File 5287.
Dressler, B.O., 1981 Massey Bay, Ontario Geological Survey Map 2541, Precambrian Geology Series, scale 1 inch to Y2 mile, 1:31680, Geology 1978.
15
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
7. Fairbairn, H.W., 1939 Geology of Ashigami Lake, Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. XLVIII, Part X; 15 pp., including Map 48m, scale 1 inch to Y2 mile, 1:31680.
8. Gates, B.l., 1991 Sudbury Mineral Occurrence Study; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5771, 235 p.
9. Hall, R.D., 2003 Scadding Gold Property at Sudbury, Ontario; for Currie Rose Resources Inc., 37 pp, 3 appendices.
10. Hill, W., 1983 Study of the Scadding Township Ore Reserves for Westfield Minerals Limited by Hill, Goettler de Laporte Limited, 28 p. 1 map.
11. Lapierre, K. and Wood, P.C., 2004 Report on the Scadding Gold Property, Scadding Township, Sudbury Area, Ontario for ~IML Resources Ltd., 51 p., 2 Vol.
12. Martins, J.M, et al., 1979 Mclean-Watt Gold Property; in Gold Deposits of Ontario, Part 2: Part of District of Cochrane, Districts of Muskoka, Nipissing, Parry Sound, Sudbury, Timiskaming and Counties of Southern Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, pp. 111-116.
13. Meyer, W., 1995 Exploration Potential in the Sudbury Area; in Ontario Canada Explore the Opportunities, Mines and Minerals Division, Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, p. 16.
14. Roscoe, S.M., 1969 Huronian Rocks and Uraniferous Conglomerates in the Canadian Shield; Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 68-40.
15. Schandl, E.S., Gorton, M.P and Davis, D.W., 1994 Albitization at 1700 ± 2 Ma in the Sudbury - Wanapitei Lake area, Ontario; implications for deep-seated alkalic magmatism in the Southern Province; Can. J. Earth Sci., vol. 31, pp. 597-607.
16. Thompson, J.E., 1961 Maclennan and Scadding Townships, Ontario Department of Mines Report No. 2; including Map 2009, scale 1 inch to Y2 mile, 1 :31680.
16
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
L.D.S. Winter
1849 Oriole Drive, Sudbury, ON P3E 2W5 (705) 560-6967
(705) 560-6997 (fax) email: [email protected]
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR
I, Lionel Donald Stewart Winter, P. Geo. do hereby certify that:
1. I am currently an independent consulting geologist.
2. I graduated with a degree in Mining Engineering (B.A.Sc.) from the University of Toronto in 1957. In addition, I have obtained a Master of Science (Applied) (M.Sc. App.) from McGill University, Montreal, QC.
3. I am a Life Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, a Life Member of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada and a Registered Geoscientist in Ontario and British Columbia (P.Geo.).
4. I have worked as a geologist for a total of 52 years since my graduation from university.
5. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 ("1\1143-1 01 ") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in N I 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of Nl 43-101.
6. I am the author responsible for the preparation of the Induced Polarization Survey Report titled "Induced Polarization (IP) Survey Report on the Red Rock East Grid, Scadding Township, District of Sudbury, Ontario" and dated 28 October 2010 (the ''Technical Report").
Dated this 281h Day of October 2010
L.D.S. Winter
17
4 :j-3.5
3
C ho rgeubillty 1i' !O: I
n ;
r·.: ~
Colculoted Resisfvity , ,
r:=2
r::.s
······~
Geoso1t Software for the Earth Sciences
2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1 +00 N t.. t. (,
..
!> (!}:
Cclculoled Re~tl~.,g~obilily Ohm .. r:1
45000 6.5
40000 6
5.5 .35000
5 30000 ~.::.
25000
20000 3.5
3 15000
2 s 10000 7
·SOO·:l I. 5
2+00 N Chorgeobitity
"::. (
~ ',: ~'
0·.
::=~-
:--, (
Co<ClJioled Resistivity
Pseudo Section Plot O+OOE
Pole-Dipole Array
a na a
Pant-leg Filter
----{!)-I '
' /
""/ plot point
/
Logarithpiif Contours' .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
INTERPRETATION
• Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
D Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
0 Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
,. Low resistivity nature.
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125
metres
a"'25m
150
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/1 0/201 0 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
Chorg€ommlif.l~ted Resistivity Ohm•m
J s
3
2 :l' 20GOO ~----~ // ----- ~- ~ I SOOO , ~--- ---- -------l.S .--~ ~
1 J.i 1 ooooJL------------- -------------
c.s soool ~----~·----~--~----~---L----~---L----~---L----~---L----L----L--~----~--~-----L--~-----L--~-----L---- [: 2•00 s 1 +00 s
r : ~r:
2+00 1\1 Cnorgeobi!i;y
C horgeobi,i ty
r 4
••= S
r;=t:> . •/
2-+00 s 1+00 s 0-tOO N 1 ~oo N 2+00 N 3•00 N Calculated Resistiv:ty ='iller
Cclculoted Resistivity ,-r •l
0-,~ .. ITI
n=? ~~t~~
:·=3 < 3~>.·1 ?n~s
r~. ·1 14 !~ I
r=3 ~ ~~~~ >(f.Y.4
.~ . (. ~%~
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
Pseudo Section Plot 0+50E
Pole-Dipole Array
na a
Pant-leg Filter
' . . ":;./
plot point
Log arith.ln ~ Contours' .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...
• D
0
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature •
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 75 100 125 ...,.._.
metres
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
150
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
1---------------------------- .... - . -- ----·--------------1 Date: 16/10/2010
Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
r: 2
-o
-2- ·2
2+0C S l+Oo s o~oo N 1+co N 2~oo N 3+00 N Chorgea bil i :y r:,,e•
Cnorgec bi! ;ty - = !
r=:i
2'1'00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N HOO i\1 2t00 1\1 3~·00 N Calculated Res:stivity 7750:.:
Colc:.;laled Resistivity "" 1 • .... ·
·'=?. ~·~~:o.g 11='..! ~~9~9
~~ij~~! ,·:11
i 66~Q t')=~ <C' I!
12()(;.(; 1'1- ~· ~~39
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
Pseudo Section Plot 1+00E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na a _______,
Pant-leg ---(i)---: r'l Filter l .. /
,. . / a:; 26m " plot point
Logarith(nif Contours' .5, 2, 3. 5, 7.5, 10, ...
• [J
0
26
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polari:tation without marked resistivity decrease.
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 126
metres
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
150
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/1 0/201 0 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
Chorg€4lill:rihiJJYJied Resistiv ity Colculoled Re~MWg~cbili\y Qhrro•m
40000· .-~---.----.-----r----r----.----.----.-----r----r----,-Oh(n 'fm
.----.----~--~----~----.----.----.----.----~--~----.-~ocoo 9
Chorgeot:ility
35000
JOCOO·
2!>000
20000
1500-:J
I OOCOoj
sooo-l
• 'tl t
.... ~ o:rl.
···~
I . ~1!1
Calculated Resistivity 0 ,. ,
... ···~
Geosott Software for the Earth Sciences
·35000 8
30000
2!>000
--- 2000-:J
t"~ 10000
5000
-2 ------- -----:::;;=--==-=-c.::-------- ------:><==--~ - - -::::...<, ____ ... -----~-------_/
2+00 s '! +00 5 0+00 N 1 +-00 N 2~ 00 N J+OO N Chorgeobility .. '
., ... !
2+00 s 1 +00 s 0+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 1 +00 N Colcu:o ted Resis~ :vity 8770 99{:i_; : 15~(:-
,,.2
lli~ l\~ ~ ~~s . .. ~~ •6 , .• !.
~' · ·t
Pseudo Section Plot 1+50E
Pole-Dipole Array ll na a
Pant-leg ~ r>-1 Filter ' /
/
• * * * e / a =2Sm
plot point
Logarith!n~ Contours· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 o ....
• 0
0
25
INTERPRETA"riON Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease .
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 0 25 75 100 125
ml!tres
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
150
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/101201 0 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORAriON LTD.
Chorg®olbiltild)l)lec Resistivity
6-or,m•m
45000]
40000
35000i
300001
2SOOOi ~--·"" 20000~ "
:~::~j .. ---~------':==----1 -~
5000-· '-'
2+00 s 1+00 s f~l:~! . ~ -. l.l:J -0 .2~ 1 :.: . S!i :·. ' 3 ~ 1;\ 0 7~ ! 0 . ~25 o .~-~
C'-1orgeobility n=
,. <
r:.j
r 4
r:=!)
··=t.
2+00 s 1+00 s Fi!t to r 12 1:. 7/tW t::b60 J l !:.:lG 1!1!00 14100 ll i :JO 1C7(";C 997{)
Colculoted Resistivity ('! J !
Q'•)r'"" • ·:~
··=~·
n=-J
·~=1
,.,.,~
·'l- f:
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
Qf00 N HOO N o . .sse -0. ~~'~ · o./.e·· -c:. :o5 -0.20 i .. 2f· :.:'. o.~ :..' .Cf• -".c.~ J tlf;
0-<00 1\' 1.,.00 N g:r::-:.> lCi'OO ::~3(:0 1350:) ':0.300 75.~0 f~IC :t.s:-o ·.)8:-JO 1-i~:lQ
2+00 N <4.6!' ~~· te li.ftR
2+00 N ~ .:040:.1 1 '6C~J 223C:)
Calcu<ated Re£Sltivg51ability
(j
Ohm•rr. 450GO
40000
35000
30000
25000
2COOO
15000
10COC
5000 --I
5 . "'6 r · :c• C hargeobi lily
r=1
' 7 6 1 .,
'I=:'· ~
~ ·t- ' Q
'"l- 5 -~ -1 1'1 =6
. ;
1C·!=?~f.l : ; !!~' Colculotecl Resisliv:\y
."l" ·. On:-n• rr~
'l=~ ~4 ~t~ 19iS1 1'\=-.:. 14 '/l
12T n · li l ~u I'\=~
'7 1 Zs~ <: ... ~~ ~~i':l
~3 ··~& :;:;sg
Pseudo Section Plot 2+00E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na a
Pant-leg Filter .. "' ,.
/ .., plot point
/ /
Logarittun~ Contours· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5. 1 o ....
INTERPRETATION
• Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
CJ Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
0 Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125
met~11
a=26m
150
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
Chorg€1!1lllrililtYJlec ~esistivity Ohrn•rn
Co lculoled Re:lltlt&•g~obil i ly Ohm•m
200001 18000
16000
:::::j· I 10000
8000
20000 ~5 ~ ! 16000 :i
~-------i 4 . 5 16000
4
---- 14000 -3 5
5.5
4.5
3.5
1200(1 .3
1()000 . ? 5
8000 I .5
2 = 2
I.S
6000]1
4000 L.~-----L----~----L----L----~----J----~----~----~--~~--_J [6000
4000 c 5
2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2•00 N ' iu ~· 2 0:, 7.5f. ?.6i~ ' it '
Chorgeobil ity Chargee bi lity r:=! ~.·.: .
:.=1
f,=<
r::.:;
2.,.00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1 +CO N 2+00 N .3.,.00 N b~)~ 57?0 595C 7).~0 ~631) S:)?.:) ss:;.:; icsvc ; ~.,~r. l '·~o;;. ~f..,oo · 8-:}~0 H~5(:·C ,76co:. l.~~'1~ , : ..... , Calculated Resi slivit y
Ca'culaled Resistivity
, .•.. ' ?gQ;·; •) -; :~ hN1
~ 1 44
r-:4 ;~5r as•" t"l' 5 g13t
?.~ :~;
'1=€ Zi~~
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
Pseudo Section Plot 2+50E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na a ______,
Pant-leg ~ rw-I Filter ' /
' • • ' ' '\;< /
a=25m plot point
Logarith.pl~ Contour~· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...
INTERPRETATION
• Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
[) Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
0 Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
T Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1:2500 .25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
metn!S
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORAriON LTD.
Chorgecttxil~tly>ted Resistivity
6
3
2
0
Ohm•m 24000·
22000
20000
18000
16000·
i4000
12COO
____ / ~:~~~JL 1000] ; -- -c:._:=.:·_--__ -_._. __ ......._ _ ___,
:?.~oo s l+OO s
Chorgeooil i~y n .. ·
n=2
n:..~
n=4
--~
-=&
/.+00 s 1+00 5 f"';1 .. -:·
Co:cu!cled Resistivi1y ··=,
'l'-'
n- e
GeoGoft Software for the Earth Sciences
0+00 N 1 +00 N 2+00 N .3+00 N Chorgeobi(;(y :; . 3a 3 7S z. 72
L 1""1
~.
O+OG N 1+00 N 2+00 N ;uio:.> i; 9<'..0 ,o;oo Colculoled Resistivity
·t=2 ~~-~&5 1 6~=· ~1.
n · 3 14•U<J
!'1:.4 ~~~~~ ~~· 5
"\:0~ Q<
4 r25
(\·· 6 ~m
Pseudo Section Plot 3+00E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na a
Pant-leg Filter
• * * *
*
, .,_,
, , /
plot point
logarithm~ ContourS' .5, 2. 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...
• c
0
25
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 125
metres
•"'25m
150
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
ChorgwllriWtlYJled Resistivity
16]
16-
14-
l:l
10
8
Chorgeo :.ility
O~m•rn
20000]
18000 '
16000~ 14000i
10000 120001 1
eOOG I
6000-1
400Ci 2UOO----'
.;.cs
1":='
r - S
r i ~cr
Colculoted Resistivity ,.. 1
GaO$ oft Software for the Earth Sciences
-------- ·--------
2+00 s 1+00 s Q-100 N 7.51 8 6 , .. 3 ' 1.6
2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N !;58(: 977C
1-tOO N 2+00 N
1 +00 N 2+00 N 1 .. /IJO 1 f-4{~0 ·-B70C
Colculoted Re5;tlw\!J!obility Oilm•m
20000
16000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
[4000
2000
.3+00 [\j
r ='
r=~
3.,.DG N
16
·14
12
10
e 6
L4
[~
Cnorgeobility
Calculated Resistivi1y Oh•':"l•r:-
n .-/ 2~~~~
r·=~ f~~: 1~P,y~
r=~ '~~ ~ n :.,!) i~*s
~~~~ n-6 '-' ... "'
Pseudo Section Plot 3+50E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na 8
Pant-leg Filter ••
.. * ' ' ,
' , ' , '\;;
plot point
Logarithfnic Contours' 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...
INTERPRETATION
• Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
IJ Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
0 Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivaty signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 so 75 100 125 150
metres
TRUE CLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
ChorgeollriliJ:IJzded Resis1vily
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0hr1•r.1
160001
l40aC~
12000
laOOa
8C00-
6000L
:::: -· ---k===-----r::===-;--
2+00 s
n=Q
2-+00 s Calculated Resislivily ",
r=7
n='-
( - 5
n= b
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
- ----------- ----··-------
Calculated Re£ilitg,obiiity Ohm•m
IGaOO
14000
120GO
IOOOC
8000
··6000
··------ 4aOO
":2
10
8
6
2
0
'-----'----'----..L----'----'-----'----'L---'----'-----'-----'-----'-----'--.-··· -'-·. - - 2000 -2
1+00 s 0+00 N 1·'00 N 2--0C N 3+00 N Cho rgeo bildy
r 1
.... J
? '· e
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2-tOO N .3+00 l\1 L ! 8 (J .)560 .)65r. <~7DO 969·0 !060C Calculated Resistivity
r=··
n=-2
Pseudo Section Plot 4+00E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na a
Pant-leg Filter •• .. ,.
• • * •
' ' /
' / ' / , plot point
Logarith.(llif Contour!· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5. 10, ...
• [J
0
,
25
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease •
Poorly defined f>Oiarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 tOO 125
metres
a=26m
150
TRUE CLAIM EXPLORATION INC. INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
Chorg€1[]))Jril~~ted .~esistivi<y On,., .. m
9000---.----.----,----,,-----,----,-
aooo.l -----~---~
:::.:j -~ SOOO· ~
20]
::J
40;)0 ·----~----
Co~culoted Re~ili,g~obility O~rr.·m . 9000
/\/8000 -----../ 7000
6000
5000
~4000
r2C 118 -16
14
8
6
j ~--- /
3000 -------- ------/""/""- ------- "
2000 --~==~====~~==c=~=i~~ ----~--~-----L----L----L----~--~----~--~-----L----L---tJ·:JCO 2 --· 2000 c
2700 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N f !!:; t l S 8 18 .3 ··c IS . i l ::, ,,!. 1< !0.3 '/. E<l I. "6 !::· 9t. b . f. l ~. 7(, ~. ~' ~. 7? 3.37 :'.•P3 '~ .<S 1.53 0 8~> 1) .977 n. ~~ -~;:; . . Jt t11te· Chorseobility
Chc: rgeobility !1:. ··= i r= L r· ~. /
\~ ' v :-=3 ('::'; l :,O ~ c ~
(I ::C4. r; ·4 :> i
r,-3 r .. e, ~ t
'-' 6 · =& "
2-+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1-tOO N 2-+00 N r::P.r 1250 2:?=-J 2 '"!0 2?.20 2180 2570 ;!.::90 5:.Sf1C JS~O 3•'C :;y,~ r. ';?.!J{) ~l'l() ~030 5210 '/; ·UO 6~~9·:) 7500 e.t..sc !>5W ·i.s:.t:..: Bbf.O riaer CobJio<ed Resistivity
Colcvloleei Resistivity !'1.-:1 r ... I 0!111'1'"(~~
{)!;~,.,. :l
:1=7 ":1 ~gf~ ,-,.::.) !\ J
f ~~6 ~~~~ ~.:-! ... ·:1
n o 4 :·o:-i
~*~~ 11=5 ·lo\2· 'l-= ~1 ~2h r~~
•l=6 \.441:.:8 ;-.... (:. L h ...
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
Pseudo Section Plot 4+50E
Pant-leg Filter
• •
Pole-Dipole Array ,__a_ ·- ___ ...;n:..:a:.__ ___ ....::a:..__.
' '
/
/
'\-:/ plot point
a=25m
Logarith{nif Contours' .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...
INTERPRETATION • Strong increase in polarization
accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Cl Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
0 Poorly defined f.Oiarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
metres
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16110/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LrD.
Chorg&Dixil~}!lled Resistivity OhrY;c rn
::!0001 1
10000
II
8000
25
20
15-
10 6000
5 4000
Colcu loled ReSJtllril.,gjlo bili ty Ohm•m
' . [ 12000
~-~.__ ~--------~ "oOOOO
~ --------------.......____~_____./ 8000
~ ------------ ~---------------- ~6000
~30
25
20
-15
-· ~-------- I~ ------- ---- 4000
-----~---~--- ~- ------------------ ---- J 2000 _ _.__ __ _,_ __ .__ _ _J ___L_ ·.coo _:] 2CCO~
··~oo I
0
-5
2"'"00 s i +00 s 0+00 N 2~ . i 2~ . .3 2'~2 22.: 16.7 7.18 4 ~ 3.?3 :.71
Chorgeobiliiy r.:..·
., . j
2+00 s 1 +00 s 0 ... 00 N ' :!~-:· 18SO 2~;'1..: 2 ;•:.::
CoicJiotecJ Resistivity n= >
(\,. .)
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
1 +00 N 2+00 N .3+00 N 0. 67 -0 . i56 · .2.) ' i l!er
·"= i
n- ?
-~oo N 2+00 t-J 3+00 N 9650 'C:SV~ i09:JO lC2CC
f'=?
r.=}
(':d
:,=~
:.s ,. r.
Chcrgeobility
~~ · ~ ~ 1 ; 0 0
Colc,Jiolec Resistivity
" /~9,~ .. Rli~ 2 ,,~ 286 11 ·1(.
g~3~ ~~1~ ~~g~
Pseudo Section Plot S+OOE
Pole-Dipole Array
na a
Pant-leg Filter ••
' ' / 'too
/ /
plot point
/
Logarith.rnif Contours· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...
• 0
0
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 25 0
-----25 50 75 100 125
metres
a=26m
150 I
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.
C1org&lxiitiJII.)llted Resistivity Ohm• m
Calculated Re:fititi'fgS!obility Ohm•m
::j :::::JF =-"' 20 8000
:j: : 1 ~ 200j -----oj _ ,-
12000 -JO
-----,......_ ,......__ --------------------
10000 75
aoor. 20
6000 i 5
f•ooo 10
2000 5
0 -0
2+CO S i+OO S 0+00 N 1 +00 N 2t-00 N 3+00 N ' ::("( Chorgeobiiity
Chorgecbi:i ty " 1
..,.,;-
.... ~
... ~ ,, .. .;
2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 1C3Cn 9ooo
.)+00 N , ;11 , . Co 1c u 1o:ed Resist ivity Fi:lt t 1 ~ 90C
CoiC\Jioted Resistivity • 1 0-:"'"' · m
.... , "1=- i
'sm •·3 "'I eli ,~ ., .. -:, ~ ~~
~-~J 11 .. (; < I
Geosoft Software tor the Earth Sciences
Pseudo Section Plot 5+50E
Pole-Dipole Array
a na
Pant-leg Filter *. • • •
" " ' " ' / 't:: plot point
Logarith.{n k: Contours· 1.5. 2. 3, 5, 7.5. 10 ... .
•
D
c
INTERPRETA.riON Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease .
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature •
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 25 50 75 100 126 150
metres
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC .
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:
DAN PA"rRIE EXPLORATION l TO.
Cho rg&DII:.CI:Ub:9J\eo Resistivity
20
It>
1C-
Ohm• m
lOCOOj 9 000
8000
'! COO
6000
!\O:JO I 4000
~-~ ~
\ / --- -------~ ----~------
'-. '">C-------// ~------
------------- ----------
---- '~
Colculoted Res:i~~~obil i\y Ollm•m
20
. ===!f10000 ---- 9000 -------------------- eooo
-7000 I o
rOM sooo 10
4000
5
---- ------ -------c==:=;- L_ __ _l ____ ~-----~--~----~--~~-----~··-----=~-------~~--~----L----L----
t JCOO ---- -· - --~ 1000 1000 0
JOOC I ~:~~] 0
2+00 s I : lt'f 199 ?J. O ?LI :~(
Chorgeobili1y
~-'
1"1-:0
2r00 S
Calculated Resistivi ty o~m • IT•
n·2
··~
~-6
Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences
1 +OC S 0+00 N
1 +00 s 0+00 N "·l'LU .:.aJo 1:~o
1•00 N '.76 • .i'S ' . 6~
1 +00 N 6.}90
'.~9 · .i--3 3+00 "'
Chorgeobility
r:•C
... -., ( :(:
2+00 N 3+00 N S7CO SJ' ~ F " cr >8~C 7)90 Co lc ~' l o ted Resis tivity
Oh-·.,.,r
' 1
'l~l · · J
r: - 4 1~~ ·~t}
· · ) ;!•
r•b 1~4~
Pseudo Section Plot 6+00E
Pole-Dipole Array
II na a
Pant-leg ~ r>-1 Filter \ , -- /
' - - ' ' - • 'e ,
ac 25m
* * plot point
Logaritl\(n~ Contour$· .5, 2, 3. 5. 7.5, 10 ....
• 0
0
25
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarizat ion accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
Poorfy defined polarization Increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 12~
metres
TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.
150
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY
Date: 16/1 0/201 0 Interpretation:
DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.