INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY REPORT ON THE RED … · INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY REPORT ON THE RED ROCK EAST GRID SCADDING TOWNSHIP DISTRICT OF SUDBURY ONTARIO FOR TRUECLAIM

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I

.47328

INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY REPORT

ON THE

RED ROCK EAST GRID

SCADDING TOWNSHIP

DISTRICT OF SUDBURY

ONTARIO

FOR

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.

Prepared by:

Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd .

L.D.S. Winter, P.Geo.

28 October 2010

____j

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Property Description and Location

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure

and Physiography

Geological Setting

4.1 Regional Geology

4.2 Local and Property Geology

4.3 Mineralization

Work Done

5.1 Induced Polarization Survey

Results

Summary and Conclusions

Recommendations

Personnel

References

Certificate of Qualification

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Table of Geological Formations Stratigraphy of the Huronian Supergroup Table 2:

Table 3:

Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: Figure 7:

Red Rock East Property, Zones of Anomalous Chargeability

LIST OF FIGURES

Location Map Property Map - Claims and Red Rock East Grid Regional Geology Property Area Geology Red Rock East Property Grid Plan of Chargeability Values; n = 2 Plan of Resistivity Values; n = 2

PAGE

3

3

3

5

5

8

8

10

10

11

14

14

15

15

17

6 7

12

2


1. INTRODUCTION

Trueclaim Exploration Inc. ("Trueclaim" or the "Company") holds a group of

claims in Scadding township, District of Sudbury, Sudbury Mining Division, Ontario

(Figure 1 ). The Property was acquired for its potential to host gold and/or platinum

group metals (PGM) concentrations of economic significance.

The Company carried out line cutting followed by an induced polarization survey

by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd. on the Red Rock East Grid (9.0 km) which is located on

the northwest corner of Ashigami Lake and within claim 4229046. The following report

describes the property, its geological setting and the work carried out on the Red Rock

East grid and the results obtained. The IP survey was done during the period 12

October and 16 October 2010.

2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The Property is located in Scadding Township between Wanapitei and Ashigarni

Lakes approximately 50 km northeast of Sudbury, Ontario at 46°-38'N latitude, 80°-37'W

longitude (UTM co-ordinates Zone 17, 529130mE and 5176250mN (Figure 1 ). The

Property is centred at Concession II and Ill, Lots 5 and 6 of Scadding Township with the

Property being within the Sudbury Mining Division and the District of Sudbury, Ontario.

The work described in this report was carried out on claim 4229046 and the Red

Rock East Grid (Figure 2).

3. ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE. LOCAL RESOURCES,

INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

Access to the Property is by way of the Kukagami Lake road from the

intersection of Ontario Highway 17 approximately 20 km west of the village of Hagar and

30 km east of the City of Sudbury. The Kukagami Lake road crosses the Property 16.8

km north of Highway 17 and from here, a network of old mine roads and trails provide

access to the central part of the Property (Figure 3).

3

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I

SCAD-FIG.t.DWG AUG./08

0 20km

SCALE

/~ /, Wanapitei ~

C,~~ Lake j \ (

\/'J v

FIGURE 1

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC. SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY

RED ROCK EAST GRID LOCATION MAP

October 2010

I I I I I I

5 1

8 ,.., -~~ .

5 16087

i.' I

,p l 3019aif

i

-- 1 i

• I

1----.1111~·----•. ~ . i i

! • I

I 4229047 . r. . . i

I I I I I I I I I I

0

i • 550!~03 i

I

I 5357988 j

I··

5359359

• 4p9046

. ·--

•

"- . ' } ":

··--.

-·'

·----·~ l: Cl

·LOT 5, .0

. 6188

. Lrr ..

FIGURE 2 TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.

SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID

CLAIM/GRID MAP

4209055

,_ .,.· (:. ,.

Scale: 1:20 000 October 2010 After Scadding Township Claim Map G-3056

-------------------

LEGEND


SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID REGIONAL GEOLOGY

October 2010


The Sudbury area has a cold continental climate with an average annual

precipitation in the order of 85 em per year and with the annual temperature being in the

range from +30°C to -40°C. Snow accumulations are generally present for a 5 month

period between November and March with the occasional storm in early April. In

general, the climatic conditions permit exploration work to be carried out at all times

during the year. In some cases, the winter season is more preferable for carrying out

geophysical and drilling work in that it provides access to swampy areas.

The Property is covered with secondary growth of poplar, birch, spruce and alder

which represent second growth following the harvesting of white pine during the early

part of the 201h Century. Forest fires from time to time have also contributed to the

destruction of the pine forest. There is currently little merchanable timber in the area.

Wanapitei Lake, Kukagami Lake and Ashigami Lake all host cottages and private resorts

which are used during both the summer and winter periods for recreational purposes.

Infrastructure and site services for the Property were removed during the

reclamation and remediation programs in the 1980's, however, single phase power and

telephone services follow the Kukagami Lake road to Kukagami Lodge on Kukagami

Lake north of the Property. The city of Sudbury approximately 30 km west of the project

is a well established mining area and can provide all of the services and skilled

personnel required for any type of exploration work and mining facilities that may be

developed on the Property.

The topographic relief of the Property is in the order of 20 m with the general

elevation of the Property being approximately 300 m above mean sea level. For the

most part, the Property is forested with approximately 25% of the area being muskeg.

Approximately 90% of the area is covered by glacial deposits and approximately 10% is

considered to be bedrock exposures which generally occur in an east-west trend

reflecting the general trend of the underlying Huronian sediments.

4


4. GEOLOGICAL SETTING

4.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Scadding Property area lies within the Precambrian Canadian Shield of

Northern Ontario, within the Southern Geological Province between the Superior

Geological Province to the north and the Grenville Geological Province to the south.

In summary, three major lithological components are present in the Southern

Province:

• An Archean basement made up of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks,

granitoid intrusives and mafic intrusive rocks,

• Huronian metasedimentary rocks containing minor intercalated mafic volcanic

rocks, overlie the Archean basement and,

• Post-Huronian intrusive rocks including Nipissing diabase sills and post Nipissing

diabase dykes and sills, small felsic intrusive bodies and lamprophyre dykes.

The major geological provinces and structures within the region are outlined in

Table 1 and in Figure 3.

5


TABLE 1 TABLE OF GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.- SCADDING GOLD PRO .. IECT AREA

Period

Mid-Proterozoic

Mid-Proterozoic

Early Proterozoic

Early Proterozoic

Early Proterozoic

Archean

Province or Complex

Grenville

Keweenawan

Sudbury Igneous Complex and Whitewater Sediments

Nipissing Diabase

Huronian Supergroup

Superior

Dominant Lithology

Variable, highly metamorphosed

Mafic Volcanics

Diorite

Gabbro and Diabase Intrusions

Clastic Sediments

Granite and Meta volcanics

Age Millions of Years (Ma)

1200- 1000

1225

1850

2115

2450-2115

>2500

The Huronian metasedimentary rocks lie unconformably above the Archean

basement. They are part of the Huronian Supergroup, portions of which extend across

the region from Sault Ste. Marie in the west to the Cobalt Area near the Quebec border

in the east. The Huronian sediments are interpreted to have been deposited during a

period of marine transgression from south to north, commencing with sandstones,

conglomerates and argillites with local intercalated mafic volcanics followed by more

mature clastic sediments and marine evaporates. The sediments are thought to have

been deposited from the northwest towards the southeast, with the clastic material

derived from gradual uplift of the foreland to the north. The unconformity with the

basement rocks is sharply defined in some places and at others is represented by

several metres of regolith.

The Huronian Supergroup has been divided into four groups, each containing

several formations (Table 2).

6


TABLE 2 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE HURONIAN SUPERGROUP SAULT STE. MARIE - SUDBURY- COBALT REGION

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC.- SCADDING GOLD PROJECT AREA

Formation

COBALT GROUP

BAR RIVER FORMATION

GORDON RIVER FORMATION

LORRAIN FORMATION

GOWGANDA FORMATION

QUIRKE LAKE GROUP

SERPENT FORMATION

ESPANOLA FORMATION

BRUCE FORMATION

HOUGH LAKE GROUP

MISSISSAGI FORMATION

PECORS FORMATION

RAMSAY LAKE FORMATION

ELLIOT LAKE GROUP

McKIM FORMATION

MATINENDA FORMATION

LIVINGSTONE CREEK FORMATION

Description

Orthoquartzite, siltstone

Siltstone

Arkose, orthoquartzite

Polymictic Conglomerate, quartzite,

siltstone, argillite

Orthoquartzite

Greywacke, limestone

Limestone, siltstone

Orthoquartzite

Greywacke, argillite, quartzite

Polymictic conglomerate

Greywacke, argillite, quartzite

Polymictic conglomerate

Arkosic quartzite

Feldspathic quartzite and conglomerates

The primary intrusive event affecting the region was the intrusion of the Nipissing

diabase sills and dykes which are dated at 2120 Ma. The sills and dykes have been

folded during the Penokean Orogeny and have been metamorphosed to greenschist

facies. The Nipissing diabase is primarily found as intrusions in the Huronian sediments,

however, they also occur in the underlying Archean rocks.

7


The major structural event that deformed the Huronian sediments was the

Penokean Orogeny, which affected the region between about 1850 Ma and 1750 Ma.

The deformation caused by the Penokean Orogeny resulted in folding and thrust faulting

of the Huronian sediments. The Murray fault system and Onaping fault systems are

composed predominantly of strike-slip faults that were formed some time after the

Grenville Orogeny (post 1000 Ma).

4.2 LOCAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The Cobalt, Quirke Lake and Hough Lake groups of the Huronian Supergroup

(Table 2) are exposed south of Wanapitei Lake in a series of northwest to southeast

oriented secondary fold structures which are truncated at the Grenville Front Tectonic

Zone a few kilometres south of the Property. Generally, the stratigraphic sequence

becomes younger in the northeast. Fold structures, including northwest-southeast

trending dykes and sills of the Nipissing suite, are overturned to the southwest and

disrupted by both northwesterly and northeasterly striking faults. Both Huronian

sediments and Nipissing intrusions were regionally metamorphosed under greenschist to

lower amphibolite facies conditions.

The Property is mainly underlain by the Mississagi formation of the Hough Lake

group, the Serpent, Espanola and Bruce formations of the Quirke Lake group, the

Gowganda formation of the Cobalt group and lesser dykes and sills of the Nipissing

intrusive suite (Figure 4). Metasedimentary strata strike approximately west and dip

moderately to steeply north in the area of historical interest. Here, metasediments are

cut by a swarm of relatively narrow mafic dykes, thought to be part of the Nipissing suite,

which strike northwesterly and dip -65° to vertically.

4.3 MINERALIZATION

Gold mineralization occurs with chlorite and iron sulphides in hydrothermal

breccia at various stratigraphic levels and in particular within the Serpent Formation.

The Serpent Formation is thought to be about 450 m thick but the top of the formation is

everywhere an erosion surface. The Serpent Formation is mainly composed of

resistant, buff weathering and massive-looking, siliceous clastic metasediments. Thickly

8

\ ' '

' '

\ lrh', (-3\ ' _,_, ' '· ... _ ....

LEGEND PROTEROZOIC

POST-HURONIAN

' '

_)

',,

Micropegmatite (granophyre).

8 Norite.

D Gabbro.

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

HURONIAN

COBALT GROUP

GOWGANDA FORMATION

,, ,_,

Co_] Conglomerate (lOa); argillite (lOb); quartzite (tOe); limestone (10d); inter· bedded conglomerate, argillite, and quartzite (tOe.

UNCONFORMITY

BRUCE GROUP

MISSISSAGI FORMATION

Quartzite; quarlz·pebble conglomerate, generally radioactive (9a); polymictic conglomerate (9b).

GREAT UNCONFORMITY

PRE-HURONIAN

-- --

I I I I I \

III',

II

I I

- - -

Red Rock East Grid Claim 4229046

- -


SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID PROPERTY GEOLOGY

- -

October 2010 Scale: 1:31 680 After Ont. Dept. Mines Map 2009 Maclennan and Scadding Townships


bedded, light grey, medium grained, muscovite-plagioclase-quartz, feldspathic quartzite

is the dominant rock type. A more thinly bedded and more argillaceous unit about 30 m

thick and consisting of metagraywacke, metasiltstone and meta-conglomerate occurs at

the basal contact with the Espanola limestone.

Resistant weathering, grey, pink and green breccias in the Central (Intermediate)

Zone show a crude concentric zoning pattern which is related to the intensity of

fracturing and hydrothermal alteration of "Serpent quartzite". Gold mineralization is

mainly contained in highly chloritic shear zones and highly chloritic breccias next to the

shear zones. Chloritic shears in the Central (Intermediate) Zone trend 330°-340°, dip

70° east and form a low angle with respect to the strike of local mafic dykes.

Chloritic wallrocks are coarse, angular, dark green coloured breccias containing

70% chlorite and greater than 5% sulphide minerals (pyrite > pyrrhotite > chalcopyrite >

arsenopyrite). Magnetite, galena and apatite are present as accessory minerals (Martins

et al., 1979). The gold content of dark green breccias containing sulphides was

commonly greater than 0.2 ounces gold per ton.

Pink coloured breccia with stringers and matrix material consisting of coarse

dolomite +grey quartz +/-(chlorite, albite, sulphides) make up an intermediate zone of

alteration. The pink breccias are coloured by ferric iron oxides and contain abundant

albite. Pink breccia contains gold mineralization in proportion to chlorite and sulphide

content. Values in the range 0.04 to 0.10 ounces gold per ton were commonly found in

pink breccia mined underground from the Central (Intermediate) Zone.

An outer zone of alteration is seen as a transition from pink coloured rocks to

light grey coloured, crackle brecciated and net-veined metasediments containing

dispersed rusty weathering spots and patches after sulphides in fractures.

Schandl et al (1994) dated the breccias at 1700 ± 2 Ma using U-Pb

geochronology on hydrothermal monazite found in albitic alteration at the Scadding mine

site. Although no occurrences of dyke material within breccia are documented in the

mines area, the breccia as dated is younger than intrusions of the Nipissing suite. Gold

mineralization in the mine area appears to be one of the youngest events since it is

9


associated with chloritic shear zones and chloritic alteration which cut and overprint,

respectively, both the breccia and the dykes.

The extent of hydrothermal breccia at the Scadding Property is unknown but may

be considerable. Known gold mineralization on the Property occurs within an area 500

m square and includes the North, Central, South, New and East-West Zones. The

North, Central (Intermediate) and South Zones are aligned along a northwesterly to

northerly trend similar to a strike of 330°-340° documented for mineralization in the

Central (Intermediate) Zone. Most diamond drilling between 1973 and 1983 was along

this trend.

The tops of the North, South and East-West Zones were mined as shallow, open

pits to depths of 7 m to 9 m. Underground development and mining of the Central

(Intermediate) Zone was within a block of ground 50 m square and 95 m high. About

80% of the total tonnage mined from the Property came from underground.

5. WORKDONE

5.1 INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

A total of 9.0 km of induced polarization readings were taken on the Red Rock

East Grid with an "a" spacing of 25 m and with 6 levels being read (N = 6) (Figure 5).

The IP survey was a time domain pole-dipole survey and it was carried out with a Walcer

9000 transmitter in combination with a Honda 18 HP motor generator and a Scintrex

IPR-12 receiver. The motor generator and transmitter were stationary on the end of the

line being read with the current being transmitted through a wire with an electrode into

the ground for contact. A second wire and electrode (the live electrode) was moved

along the line being surveyed as per the survey protocol. At all times, the transmitter

man, live electrode man and receiver personnel were in radio contact. Ahead of the live

current electrode was a crew of men with electrodes at 25 m intervals. These electrodes

are connected to the receiver where the receiver operator obtains and records the

readings. The data is downloaded from the receiver at the end of the day to a computer

where the resistivity and chargeability are calculated and plotted using pseudosections

and/or maps using Geosoft software.

10

- - - - - - - - -w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 Lt) 0 U') 0 Lt) + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0 T"'" T"'" t\1 t\1 (f) (f) -.::1" -.::1" Lt) Lt) _J _J __. __. _J __. __. __. _J __. _J __.

Stations located at 25m intervals with pickets using metal tags.

-w 0 0 + cc _J

-------N ast.

Red Rock East Property

UTM Zone 17T co-ordinates shown in NAD 83 co-ordinates

BL @ LO+OOE; 530350mE, 5168200mN BL @ L6+00E; 530950mE; 5168200mN

FIGURE 5 TRUE CLAIM EXPLORATION INC.

SCADDING GOLD PROPERTY RED ROCK EAST GRID

October 2010 Scale: 1:5000


The IP survey was carried out by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd., Massey, Ontario

an experienced geophysical contractor. The survey personnel are listed in Section 9.

The IP was performed between 12 October and 16 October 2010 (inclusive).

6. RESULTS

A total of 9.0 line-km were surveyed during the IP survey with the results for each

pseudosection summarized in Table 3. Pseudosections on lines spaced at 50 m for the

lines from O+OOE to 6+00E are provided in the pockets of the report (13

pseudosections). Figure 6 is a plan map, at n = 2 compiled from the pseudosections

showing the location of and the trends of the main zones of increased chargeability.

Figure 7 is the corresponding resistivity map.

In general the background chargeability values range from <0 mVN to 1 mVN to

5 mVN. Zones of increased chargeabilities range up to a maximum of 35 mVN,

however, most anomalous values are in the 2-10 mVN range i.e., the areas of increased

chargeability are in the order of 2 x to 6 x background.

The areas of increased chargeability appear to occur in two zones. A southern

zone present in the southeast corner of the grid at L6+00E; 1 +25S to beyond 3+00S

extends on a west-northwest trend to L3+00E following which there is a break for about

150 m and then it continues across lines 1 +OOE, 0+50E and O+OOE to the western edge

of the grid. This is a broad zone of increased chargeabilities up to 35 mVN and with low

resistivities. The second zone in the grid occurs from L3+00E to LO+OOE at the northern

ends of the lines. Here the maximum chargeability is 9 and the zone has increased

resistivity values associated with it.

II


LINE

O+OOE

0+50E

1+00E

1+50E

2+00E

TABLE 3 RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC. ZONES OF ANOMALOUS CHARGEABILITY

CHARGEABILITY VALUES STATION BACKGROUND ANOMALY

mVN mVN

1+00S to 1 to 4 4 to 8

0+25N

1+00S to 0+65N

<0 to 3 3 to 5

2+00N to 2+35N (end of line)

<0 to 3 3 to 5

1+75S to <0 to 3 3 to 6

0+25N

1+75N to end of line at 2+30N

<0 to 3 3 to 9

2+80S <0 to 1 1 to 5

at end of line

1+00S to 2+00S

<0 to 1 1 to 2

1 +60N to 2+35N (end of line)

<0 to 1 1 to 9

2+80S <0 to 2 2 to 5

at end of line

2+00S to 1+30S

<0 to 2 2 to 5

COMMENTS

Approximately 125 m wide, weak chargeability zone with central core of higher chargeability. Associated resistivity increase. Apparent dip to south.

Broad, weak chargeability zone (approximately 165m) with central core at O+OON of increased chargeability. Associated higher resistivity.

Weak, broad zone below n = 2 with associated higher resistivity.

Weak, broad chargeability zone approximately 200 m wide with apparent slope to north and with apparent south dipping internal zones. Associated higher resistivity.

Weak to moderate broad chargeability zone with associated higher resistivity.

Zone at end of line with associated low resistivity.

Broad, weak chargeability zone with dip to north with associated low resistivity.

Broad, weak to moderate chargeability zone with associated high resistivity.

Zone at end of line with associated low resistivity.

70 m wide, weak chargeability zone with apparent dip to north and mixed resistivity.

12


2+50E

3+00E

3+50E

4+00E

4+50E

5+00E

5+50E

6+00E

0+80N to 2+1 ON (end of line)

2+40S to 1+20S

0+ ?ON to 2+30N at end of line

2+25S (at end of line) to

0+90S

1 +1 ON to 2+30N at end of line

2+30S to 0+60S

2+00N to 2+30N at end of line

2+50S to 0+40S

2+40S to 1+00S

2+60S at end of line to

0+60S


1+50S


1+60S

1+70S to 0+10N

Broad, weak to moderate <0 to 2 2 to 8 chargeability zone with

associated high resistivity.

Broad, wide to moderate

0 to 3 3 to 8 chargeability zone below n = 3 (about 50 m depth) with associated low resistivity.

Broad, weak chargeability <0 to 3 3 to 6 zone with associated high

resistivity.

Broad, weak to moderate

<0 to 4 4 to 10 chargeability zone with strongest values to south at 2+00S.

Weak, broad chargeability <0 to 4 4 to 5 zone with associated higher

resistivity values.

Broad, weak to moderate chargeability zone with two

<0 to 4 4 to 27 south-dipping zones of high chargeability values with associated weak resistivity.

Weak chargeability zone at <0 to 4 4 to 5 north end of line with high

resistivity.

Broad zone of moderate to <0 to 5 5 to 23 strong chargeability with

associated low resistivity.

Broad zone of moderate to 0 to 5 5 to 26 strong chargeability with








Broad, weak chargeability <0 to 3 3 to 6 zone with associated low

resistivity.

13


.---- -ro __ _ _ _ _ ....:.1.:;..:oo'---------=2o;:..:::o _____ ~3o~o_ 400 ~ -- - - - ,- -· - --

0 o -

~~

0.

g -I

0 0 "':'

g . L .... ~· ---

0 100 200 300 -400

500

500

600 I

··*O

. g

' 600

1

0 0 0

.()

.()

-1

-1

-1 I FULL COL;R SCALE BAR- ~

CHARGEABILITY CONTOURED@ 5

Scale 1 :2500

-----l

%$ 0 2S ~0 75 100 125 150 175 iZiZiiL . - -'

metre.$

FIGURE 6

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC. RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY

CALCULATED CHARGEABiliTY Mx 590-820

DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LTD.


7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The IP survey has identified two zones of increased chargeability values. The

southern zone extends in a west-northwest direction from the southeast part of the grid

(L6+00E) to the western edge of the grid (LO+OOE), however, there is a break in the

zone for about 150 m between 1 +25E and 2+ 75E. The zone is about 200 m wide in the

east and narrows to about 125 m wide to the west. The zone shows low resistivity and

is probably due to the presence of disseminated sulphides(?).

The second or northerly zone is present from L3+50E to LO+OO in the

northwestern part of the grid, trends east-west and extends off the grid to the north.

Chargeability values reach a maximum of 9 mVN and may be due to small amounts of

disseminated sulphides. This zone has associated high resistivity values.

The area of the grid is underlain by conglomerates, argillites and quartzites of the

Gowganda formation. The chargeability anomalies are considered to be due to

disseminated sulphides. If this is the case they may be present as disseminated grains

in the sediments or in cross-cutting structures/shears.

8. RECOMMENDATIONS

The zones of increased chargeability may contain zones of disseminated

sulphides of economic interest. To evaluate this potential a program of prospecting,

geological mapping followed by stripping and sampling in the area of the two IP

anomalies is recommended. Drilling of the zones could follow if the results of the earlier

work are positive.

14


9. PERSONNEL

The surveys were carried out by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd., Massey, Ontario

using the following personnel.

Mike Faulkner, Walford, Ontario

Gab Roy, Elliot Lake, Ontario

Mike Whalen, Walford, Ontario

Bronson Ede, Sudbury, Ontario

Andy Desjardins, Espanola, Ontario

Tyler Gagan, Espanola, Ontario

Cliff Moffatt, Sudbury, Ontario

Matt Mandigo, Massey, Ontario

Brent Patrie, Val Therese, Ontario

Jim Patrie, Massey, Ontario.

10. REFERENCES

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

There is a library of the internal reports, maps and drawings for the period 1973 to 1990 held by Paul C. Mclean, South River, Ontario.

Card, K.D. and Pattison, E.F., 1973 Nipissing diabase of the Southern Province, Ontario; in Huronian Stratigraphy and Sedimentation, ed. G.M. Young, Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper Number 12, pp. 7-30.

Collins, W.H., 1913 Geology of a portion of the Sudbury map-area south of Wanapitei Lake, Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada Summary Report.

Collins, W.H., 1914 Wanapitei Sheet, Map 124A; Geological Survey of Canada.

Dressler, B.O., 1980 Geology of the Wanapitei Lake Area, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey, Open File 5287.

Dressler, B.O., 1981 Massey Bay, Ontario Geological Survey Map 2541, Precambrian Geology Series, scale 1 inch to Y2 mile, 1:31680, Geology 1978.

15


7. Fairbairn, H.W., 1939 Geology of Ashigami Lake, Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. XLVIII, Part X; 15 pp., including Map 48m, scale 1 inch to Y2 mile, 1:31680.

8. Gates, B.l., 1991 Sudbury Mineral Occurrence Study; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5771, 235 p.

9. Hall, R.D., 2003 Scadding Gold Property at Sudbury, Ontario; for Currie Rose Resources Inc., 37 pp, 3 appendices.

10. Hill, W., 1983 Study of the Scadding Township Ore Reserves for Westfield Minerals Limited by Hill, Goettler de Laporte Limited, 28 p. 1 map.

11. Lapierre, K. and Wood, P.C., 2004 Report on the Scadding Gold Property, Scadding Township, Sudbury Area, Ontario for ~IML Resources Ltd., 51 p., 2 Vol.

12. Martins, J.M, et al., 1979 Mclean-Watt Gold Property; in Gold Deposits of Ontario, Part 2: Part of District of Cochrane, Districts of Muskoka, Nipissing, Parry Sound, Sudbury, Timiskaming and Counties of Southern Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, pp. 111-116.

13. Meyer, W., 1995 Exploration Potential in the Sudbury Area; in Ontario Canada Explore the Opportunities, Mines and Minerals Division, Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, p. 16.

14. Roscoe, S.M., 1969 Huronian Rocks and Uraniferous Conglomerates in the Canadian Shield; Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 68-40.

15. Schandl, E.S., Gorton, M.P and Davis, D.W., 1994 Albitization at 1700 ± 2 Ma in the Sudbury - Wanapitei Lake area, Ontario; implications for deep-seated alkalic magmatism in the Southern Province; Can. J. Earth Sci., vol. 31, pp. 597-607.

16. Thompson, J.E., 1961 Maclennan and Scadding Townships, Ontario Department of Mines Report No. 2; including Map 2009, scale 1 inch to Y2 mile, 1 :31680.

16


L.D.S. Winter

1849 Oriole Drive, Sudbury, ON P3E 2W5 (705) 560-6967

(705) 560-6997 (fax) email: [email protected]

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR

I, Lionel Donald Stewart Winter, P. Geo. do hereby certify that:

1. I am currently an independent consulting geologist.

2. I graduated with a degree in Mining Engineering (B.A.Sc.) from the University of Toronto in 1957. In addition, I have obtained a Master of Science (Applied) (M.Sc. App.) from McGill University, Montreal, QC.

3. I am a Life Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining, a Life Member of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada and a Registered Geoscientist in Ontario and British Columbia (P.Geo.).

4. I have worked as a geologist for a total of 52 years since my graduation from university.

5. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 ("1\1143-1 01 ") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in N I 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of Nl 43-101.

6. I am the author responsible for the preparation of the Induced Polarization Survey Report titled "Induced Polarization (IP) Survey Report on the Red Rock East Grid, Scadding Township, District of Sudbury, Ontario" and dated 28 October 2010 (the ''Technical Report").

Dated this 281h Day of October 2010

L.D.S. Winter

17

4 :j-3.5

3

C ho rgeubillty 1i' !O: I

n ;

r·.: ~

Colculoted Resisfvity , ,

r:=2

r::.s

······~

Geoso1t Software for the Earth Sciences

2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1 +00 N t.. t. (,

..

!> (!}:

Cclculoled Re~tl~.,g~obilily Ohm .. r:1

45000 6.5

40000 6

5.5 .35000

5 30000 ~.::.

25000

20000 3.5

3 15000

2 s 10000 7

·SOO·:l I. 5

2+00 N Chorgeobitity

"::. (

~ ',: ~'

0·.

::=~-

:--, (

Co<ClJioled Resistivity

Pseudo Section Plot O+OOE

Pole-Dipole Array

a na a

Pant-leg Filter

----{!)-I '

' /

""/ plot point

/

Logarithpiif Contours' .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...

INTERPRETATION

• Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.

D Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.

0 Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.

,. Low resistivity nature.

Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125

metres

a"'25m

150


INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY

Date: 16/1 0/201 0 Interpretation:


Chorg€ommlif.l~ted Resistivity Ohm•m

J s

3

2 :l' 20GOO ~----~ // ----- ~- ~ I SOOO , ~--- ---- -------l.S .--~ ~

1 J.i 1 ooooJL------------- -------------

c.s soool ~----~·----~--~----~---L----~---L----~---L----~---L----L----L--~----~--~-----L--~-----L--~-----L---- [: 2•00 s 1 +00 s

r : ~r:

2+00 1\1 Cnorgeobi!i;y

C horgeobi,i ty

r 4

••= S

r;=t:> . •/

2-+00 s 1+00 s 0-tOO N 1 ~oo N 2+00 N 3•00 N Calculated Resistiv:ty ='iller

Cclculoted Resistivity ,-r •l

0-,~ .. ITI

n=? ~~t~~

:·=3 < 3~>.·1 ?n~s

r~. ·1 14 !~ I

r=3 ~ ~~~~ >(f.Y.4

.~ . (. ~%~

Geosoft Software for the Earth Sciences

Pseudo Section Plot 0+50E

Pole-Dipole Array

na a

Pant-leg Filter

' . . ":;./

plot point

Log arith.ln ~ Contours' .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...

• D

0

INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.

Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.

Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.

Low resistivity feature •

Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 75 100 125 ...,.._.

metres


150

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY

1---------------------------- .... - . -- ----·--------------1 Date: 16/10/2010

Interpretation:


r: 2

-o

-2- ·2

2+0C S l+Oo s o~oo N 1+co N 2~oo N 3+00 N Chorgea bil i :y r:,,e•

Cnorgec bi! ;ty - = !

r=:i

2'1'00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N HOO i\1 2t00 1\1 3~·00 N Calculated Res:stivity 7750:.:

Colc:.;laled Resistivity "" 1 • .... ·

·'=?. ~·~~:o.g 11='..! ~~9~9

~~ij~~! ,·:11

i 66~Q t')=~ <C' I!

12()(;.(; 1'1- ~· ~~39



Pole-Dipole Array

a na a _______,

Pant-leg ---(i)---: r'l Filter l .. /

,. . / a:; 26m " plot point

Logarith(nif Contours' .5, 2, 3. 5, 7.5, 10, ...

• [J

0

26


Well defined increase in polari:tation without marked resistivity decrease.


Low resistivity feature.

Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 126

metres


150





Chorg€4lill:rihiJJYJied Resistiv ity Colculoled Re~MWg~cbili\y Qhrro•m

40000· .-~---.----.-----r----r----.----.----.-----r----r----,-Oh(n 'fm

.----.----~--~----~----.----.----.----.----~--~----.-~ocoo 9

Chorgeot:ility

35000

JOCOO·

2!>000

20000

1500-:J

I OOCOoj

sooo-l

• 'tl t

.... ~ o:rl.

···~

I . ~1!1

Calculated Resistivity 0 ,. ,

... ···~

Geosott Software for the Earth Sciences

·35000 8

30000

2!>000

--- 2000-:J

t"~ 10000

5000

-2 ------- -----:::;;=--==-=-c.::-------- ------:><==--~ - - -::::...<, ____ ... -----~-------_/

2+00 s '! +00 5 0+00 N 1 +-00 N 2~ 00 N J+OO N Chorgeobility .. '

., ... !

2+00 s 1 +00 s 0+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 1 +00 N Colcu:o ted Resis~ :vity 8770 99{:i_; : 15~(:-

,,.2

lli~ l\~ ~ ~~s . .. ~~ •6 , .• !.

~' · ·t


Pole-Dipole Array ll na a

Pant-leg ~ r>-1 Filter ' /

/

• * * * e / a =2Sm

plot point

Logarith!n~ Contours· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 o ....

• 0

0

25

INTERPRETA"riON Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.

Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease .



Scale 1 :2500 0 25 75 100 125

ml!tres


150



Date: 16/101201 0 Interpretation:

DAN PATRIE EXPLORAriON LTD.

Chorg®olbiltild)l)lec Resistivity

6-or,m•m

45000]

40000

35000i

300001

2SOOOi ~--·"" 20000~ "

:~::~j .. ---~------':==----1 -~

5000-· '-'

2+00 s 1+00 s f~l:~! . ~ -. l.l:J -0 .2~ 1 :.: . S!i :·. ' 3 ~ 1;\ 0 7~ ! 0 . ~25 o .~-~

C'-1orgeobility n=

,. <

r:.j

r 4

r:=!)

··=t.

2+00 s 1+00 s Fi!t to r 12 1:. 7/tW t::b60 J l !:.:lG 1!1!00 14100 ll i :JO 1C7(";C 997{)

Colculoted Resistivity ('! J !

Q'•)r'"" • ·:~

··=~·

n=-J

·~=1

,.,.,~

·'l- f:


Qf00 N HOO N o . .sse -0. ~~'~ · o./.e·· -c:. :o5 -0.20 i .. 2f· :.:'. o.~ :..' .Cf• -".c.~ J tlf;

0-<00 1\' 1.,.00 N g:r::-:.> lCi'OO ::~3(:0 1350:) ':0.300 75.~0 f~IC :t.s:-o ·.)8:-JO 1-i~:lQ

2+00 N <4.6!' ~~· te li.ftR

2+00 N ~ .:040:.1 1 '6C~J 223C:)

Calcu<ated Re£Sltivg51ability

(j

Ohm•rr. 450GO

40000

35000

30000

25000

2COOO

15000

10COC

5000 --I

5 . "'6 r · :c• C hargeobi lily

r=1

' 7 6 1 .,

'I=:'· ~

~ ·t- ' Q

'"l- 5 -~ -1 1'1 =6

. ;

1C·!=?~f.l : ; !!~' Colculotecl Resisliv:\y

."l" ·. On:-n• rr~

'l=~ ~4 ~t~ 19iS1 1'\=-.:. 14 '/l

12T n · li l ~u I'\=~

'7 1 Zs~ <: ... ~~ ~~i':l

~3 ··~& :;:;sg


Pole-Dipole Array

a na a

Pant-leg Filter .. "' ,.

/ .., plot point

/ /

Logarittun~ Contours· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5. 1 o ....

INTERPRETATION


CJ Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.



Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125

met~11

a=26m

150




Date: 16/10/2010 Interpretation:


Chorg€1!1lllrililtYJlec ~esistivity Ohrn•rn

Co lculoled Re:lltlt&•g~obil i ly Ohm•m

200001 18000

16000

:::::j· I 10000

8000

20000 ~5 ~ ! 16000 :i

~-------i 4 . 5 16000

4

---- 14000 -3 5

5.5

4.5

3.5

1200(1 .3

1()000 . ? 5

8000 I .5

2 = 2

I.S

6000]1

4000 L.~-----L----~----L----L----~----J----~----~----~--~~--_J [6000

4000 c 5

2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2•00 N ' iu ~· 2 0:, 7.5f. ?.6i~ ' it '

Chorgeobil ity Chargee bi lity r:=! ~.·.: .

:.=1

f,=<

r::.:;

2.,.00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1 +CO N 2+00 N .3.,.00 N b~)~ 57?0 595C 7).~0 ~631) S:)?.:) ss:;.:; icsvc ; ~.,~r. l '·~o;;. ~f..,oo · 8-:}~0 H~5(:·C ,76co:. l.~~'1~ , : ..... , Calculated Resi slivit y

Ca'culaled Resistivity

, .•.. ' ?gQ;·; •) -; :~ hN1

~ 1 44

r-:4 ;~5r as•" t"l' 5 g13t

?.~ :~;

'1=€ Zi~~



Pole-Dipole Array

a na a ______,

Pant-leg ~ rw-I Filter ' /

' • • ' ' '\;< /

a=25m plot point

Logarith.pl~ Contour~· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...

INTERPRETATION


[) Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.


T Low resistivity feature.

Scale 1:2500 .25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150

metn!S





DAN PATRIE EXPLORAriON LTD.

Chorgecttxil~tly>ted Resistivity

6

3

2

0

Ohm•m 24000·

22000

20000

18000

16000·

i4000

12COO

____ / ~:~~~JL 1000] ; -- -c:._:=.:·_--__ -_._. __ ......._ _ ___,

:?.~oo s l+OO s

Chorgeooil i~y n .. ·

n=2

n:..~

n=4

--~

-=&

/.+00 s 1+00 5 f"';1 .. -:·

Co:cu!cled Resistivi1y ··=,

'l'-'

n- e

GeoGoft Software for the Earth Sciences

0+00 N 1 +00 N 2+00 N .3+00 N Chorgeobi(;(y :; . 3a 3 7S z. 72

L 1""1

~.

O+OG N 1+00 N 2+00 N ;uio:.> i; 9<'..0 ,o;oo Colculoled Resistivity

·t=2 ~~-~&5 1 6~=· ~1.

n · 3 14•U<J

!'1:.4 ~~~~~ ~~· 5

"\:0~ Q<

4 r25

(\·· 6 ~m


Pole-Dipole Array

a na a

Pant-leg Filter

• * * *

*

, .,_,

, , /

plot point

logarithm~ ContourS' .5, 2. 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...

• c

0

25





Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 125

metres

•"'25m

150






ChorgwllriWtlYJled Resistivity

16]

16-

14-

l:l

10

8

Chorgeo :.ility

O~m•rn

20000]

18000 '

16000~ 14000i

10000 120001 1

eOOG I

6000-1

400Ci 2UOO----'

.;.cs

1":='

r - S

r i ~cr

Colculoted Resistivity ,.. 1

GaO$ oft Software for the Earth Sciences

-------- ·--------

2+00 s 1+00 s Q-100 N 7.51 8 6 , .. 3 ' 1.6

2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N !;58(: 977C

1-tOO N 2+00 N

1 +00 N 2+00 N 1 .. /IJO 1 f-4{~0 ·-B70C

Colculoted Re5;tlw\!J!obility Oilm•m

20000

16000

16000

14000

12000

10000

8000

6000

[4000

2000

.3+00 [\j

r ='

r=~

3.,.DG N

16

·14

12

10

e 6

L4

[~

Cnorgeobility

Calculated Resistivi1y Oh•':"l•r:-

n .-/ 2~~~~

r·=~ f~~: 1~P,y~

r=~ '~~ ~ n :.,!) i~*s

~~~~ n-6 '-' ... "'


Pole-Dipole Array

a na 8

Pant-leg Filter ••

.. * ' ' ,

' , ' , '\;;

plot point

Logarithfnic Contours' 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...

INTERPRETATION


IJ Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.

0 Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivaty signature.


Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 so 75 100 125 150

metres

TRUE CLAIM EXPLORATION INC.





ChorgeollriliJ:IJzded Resis1vily

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0hr1•r.1

160001

l40aC~

12000

laOOa

8C00-

6000L

:::: -· ---k===-----r::===-;--

2+00 s

n=Q

2-+00 s Calculated Resislivily ",

r=7

n='-

( - 5

n= b


- ----------- ----··-------

Calculated Re£ilitg,obiiity Ohm•m

IGaOO

14000

120GO

IOOOC

8000

··6000

··------ 4aOO

":2

10

8

6

2

0

'-----'----'----..L----'----'-----'----'L---'----'-----'-----'-----'-----'--.-··· -'-·. - - 2000 -2

1+00 s 0+00 N 1·'00 N 2--0C N 3+00 N Cho rgeo bildy

r 1

.... J

? '· e

1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2-tOO N .3+00 l\1 L ! 8 (J .)560 .)65r. <~7DO 969·0 !060C Calculated Resistivity

r=··

n=-2


Pole-Dipole Array

a na a

Pant-leg Filter •• .. ,.

• • * •

' ' /

' / ' / , plot point

Logarith.(llif Contour!· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5. 10, ...

• [J

0

,

25


Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease •

Poorly defined f>Oiarization increase with no resistivity signature.


Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 tOO 125

metres

a=26m

150

TRUE CLAIM EXPLORATION INC. INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY




Chorg€1[]))Jril~~ted .~esistivi<y On,., .. m

9000---.----.----,----,,-----,----,-

aooo.l -----~---~

:::.:j -~ SOOO· ~

20]

::J

40;)0 ·----~----

Co~culoted Re~ili,g~obility O~rr.·m . 9000

/\/8000 -----../ 7000

6000

5000

~4000

r2C 118 -16

14

8

6

j ~--- /

3000 -------- ------/""/""- ------- "

2000 --~==~====~~==c=~=i~~ ----~--~-----L----L----L----~--~----~--~-----L----L---tJ·:JCO 2 --· 2000 c

2700 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N f !!:; t l S 8 18 .3 ··c IS . i l ::, ,,!. 1< !0.3 '/. E<l I. "6 !::· 9t. b . f. l ~. 7(, ~. ~' ~. 7? 3.37 :'.•P3 '~ .<S 1.53 0 8~> 1) .977 n. ~~ -~;:; . . Jt t11te· Chorseobility

Chc: rgeobility !1:. ··= i r= L r· ~. /

\~ ' v :-=3 ('::'; l :,O ~ c ~

(I ::C4. r; ·4 :> i

r,-3 r .. e, ~ t

'-' 6 · =& "

2-+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1-tOO N 2-+00 N r::P.r 1250 2:?=-J 2 '"!0 2?.20 2180 2570 ;!.::90 5:.Sf1C JS~O 3•'C :;y,~ r. ';?.!J{) ~l'l() ~030 5210 '/; ·UO 6~~9·:) 7500 e.t..sc !>5W ·i.s:.t:..: Bbf.O riaer CobJio<ed Resistivity

Colcvloleei Resistivity !'1.-:1 r ... I 0!111'1'"(~~

{)!;~,.,. :l

:1=7 ":1 ~gf~ ,-,.::.) !\ J

f ~~6 ~~~~ ~.:-! ... ·:1

n o 4 :·o:-i

~*~~ 11=5 ·lo\2· 'l-= ~1 ~2h r~~

•l=6 \.441:.:8 ;-.... (:. L h ...



Pant-leg Filter

• •

Pole-Dipole Array ,__a_ ·- ___ ...;n:..:a:.__ ___ ....::a:..__.

' '

/

/

'\-:/ plot point

a=25m

Logarith{nif Contours' .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...

INTERPRETATION • Strong increase in polarization

accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.

Cl Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.

0 Poorly defined f.Oiarization increase with no resistivity signature.


Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150

metres


INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY RED ROCK EAST PROPERTY

Date: 16110/2010 Interpretation:

DAN PATRIE EXPLORATION LrD.

Chorg&Dixil~}!lled Resistivity OhrY;c rn

::!0001 1

10000

II

8000

25

20

15-

10 6000

5 4000

Colcu loled ReSJtllril.,gjlo bili ty Ohm•m

' . [ 12000

~-~.__ ~--------~ "oOOOO

~ --------------.......____~_____./ 8000

~ ------------ ~---------------- ~6000

~30

25

20

-15

-· ~-------- I~ ------- ---- 4000

-----~---~--- ~- ------------------ ---- J 2000 _ _.__ __ _,_ __ .__ _ _J ___L_ ·.coo _:] 2CCO~

··~oo I

0

-5

2"'"00 s i +00 s 0+00 N 2~ . i 2~ . .3 2'~2 22.: 16.7 7.18 4 ~ 3.?3 :.71

Chorgeobiliiy r.:..·

., . j

2+00 s 1 +00 s 0 ... 00 N ' :!~-:· 18SO 2~;'1..: 2 ;•:.::

CoicJiotecJ Resistivity n= >

(\,. .)


1 +00 N 2+00 N .3+00 N 0. 67 -0 . i56 · .2.) ' i l!er

·"= i

n- ?

-~oo N 2+00 t-J 3+00 N 9650 'C:SV~ i09:JO lC2CC

f'=?

r.=}

(':d

:,=~

:.s ,. r.

Chcrgeobility

~~ · ~ ~ 1 ; 0 0

Colc,Jiolec Resistivity

" /~9,~ .. Rli~ 2 ,,~ 286 11 ·1(.

g~3~ ~~1~ ~~g~

Pseudo Section Plot S+OOE

Pole-Dipole Array

na a

Pant-leg Filter ••

' ' / 'too

/ /

plot point

/

Logarith.rnif Contours· .5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 1 0, ...

• 0

0





Scale 1 :2500 25 0

-----25 50 75 100 125

metres

a=26m

150 I






C1org&lxiitiJII.)llted Resistivity Ohm• m

Calculated Re:fititi'fgS!obility Ohm•m

::j :::::JF =-"' 20 8000

:j: : 1 ~ 200j -----oj _ ,-

12000 -JO

-----,......_ ,......__ --------------------

10000 75

aoor. 20

6000 i 5

f•ooo 10

2000 5

0 -0

2+CO S i+OO S 0+00 N 1 +00 N 2t-00 N 3+00 N ' ::("( Chorgeobiiity

Chorgecbi:i ty " 1

..,.,;-

.... ~

... ~ ,, .. .;

2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 1C3Cn 9ooo

.)+00 N , ;11 , . Co 1c u 1o:ed Resist ivity Fi:lt t 1 ~ 90C

CoiC\Jioted Resistivity • 1 0-:"'"' · m

.... , "1=- i

'sm •·3 "'I eli ,~ ., .. -:, ~ ~~

~-~J 11 .. (; < I

Geosoft Software tor the Earth Sciences


Pole-Dipole Array

a na

Pant-leg Filter *. • • •

" " ' " ' / 't:: plot point

Logarith.{n k: Contours· 1.5. 2. 3, 5, 7.5. 10 ... .

•

D

c

INTERPRETA.riON Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.

Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease .

Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature •


Scale 1 :2500 25 50 75 100 126 150

metres

TRUECLAIM EXPLORATION INC .




DAN PA"rRIE EXPLORATION l TO.

Cho rg&DII:.CI:Ub:9J\eo Resistivity

20

It>

1C-

Ohm• m

lOCOOj 9 000

8000

'! COO

6000

!\O:JO I 4000

~-~ ~

\ / --- -------~ ----~------

'-. '">C-------// ~------

------------- ----------

---- '~

Colculoted Res:i~~~obil i\y Ollm•m

20

. ===!f10000 ---- 9000 -------------------- eooo

-7000 I o

rOM sooo 10

4000

5

---- ------ -------c==:=;- L_ __ _l ____ ~-----~--~----~--~~-----~··-----=~-------~~--~----L----L----

t JCOO ---- -· - --~ 1000 1000 0

JOOC I ~:~~] 0

2+00 s I : lt'f 199 ?J. O ?LI :~(

Chorgeobili1y

~-'

1"1-:0

2r00 S

Calculated Resistivi ty o~m • IT•

n·2

··~

~-6


1 +OC S 0+00 N

1 +00 s 0+00 N "·l'LU .:.aJo 1:~o

1•00 N '.76 • .i'S ' . 6~

1 +00 N 6.}90

'.~9 · .i--3 3+00 "'

Chorgeobility

r:•C

... -., ( :(:

2+00 N 3+00 N S7CO SJ' ~ F " cr >8~C 7)90 Co lc ~' l o ted Resis tivity

Oh-·.,.,r

' 1

'l~l · · J

r: - 4 1~~ ·~t}

· · ) ;!•

r•b 1~4~


Pole-Dipole Array

II na a

Pant-leg ~ r>-1 Filter \ , -- /

' - - ' ' - • 'e ,

ac 25m

* * plot point

Logaritl\(n~ Contour$· .5, 2, 3. 5. 7.5, 10 ....

• 0

0

25

INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarizat ion accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.


Poorfy defined polarization Increase with no resistivity signature.


Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 12~

metres


150





Documents

INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY REPORT ON THE RED … · INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY REPORT ON THE RED ROCK EAST GRID SCADDING TOWNSHIP DISTRICT OF SUDBURY ONTARIO FOR TRUECLAIM