Transcript
Page 1: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

IIGCE June 5 2014

Dr. Bret Mattes

Page 2: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

The opportunity cost of not developing geothermal in Indonesia is massive. So why has development been allowed to lag…..?

• Average lead time for new projects in Indonesia has been > 12 years

• Fundamental issue – petroleum-scale capital at risk upstream for a utility rate of return downstream

• Is Sarulla the breakthrough project that will give the industry momentum??

• Where does the blame lie – public or private?

Page 3: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

What’s holding us back?

• Demand issues• Accessibility • Resource quality• Pricing• Industry structure• Finance• ??

Page 4: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

Demand• Market is clamoring for base-load electricity• Government has outlined clear electrification and

renewable energy targets; but…• Market is distorted – energy subsidies soak up

almost 20% of annual national budget• Lack of coordination within government• Risks are not shared equitably• Government guarantee is inadequate• No national database• License rules not rigorously enforced

Page 5: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

Accessibility• Extractive mining activity• Cumbersome tender process• IUP commitments that don’t reflect:

– Paucity of data– Delays with PPA– Delays with forestry approvals and other consents

• High drilling costs– Onerous treatment of drilling cuttings

• Land acquisition issues• Limited talent pool• Lack of coordination within government• Exploration Fund is ill-conceived

Page 6: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

Resource

• Inconsistent definition of resources at time of gazettal

• Mix of high/low temperature; deep/shallow• Geography

Page 7: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

Pricing• Bidding requires nominal tariff at COD to be

specified before resource data is available• National cap versus FIT; avoidable cost versus

project-specific B to B outcome• Post-COD escalation reflects inequitable risk

sharing

Page 8: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

Industry Structure

• Single buyer– Also a developer– Can’t choose its suppliers

• Plant versus unit commissioning – encourages irresponsible development strategies

• Coordination across and between levels of government• Who builds/owns/operates connection infrastructure?• Needed: experienced, persistent developers willing to

risk upstream capital• “Fast track” was a rhetorical turn of phrase

Page 9: Geothermal in Indonesia – Developers’ Perspective

THANK YOU


Recommended