Educational Master Plan Data
Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC)May 28, 2015
E. KuoFH IR&P
• Review EMP process• Review internal and external scan data
– Data about students– Data about community – This is overview data—at the 30,000 ft level
Overview
2
There is an Educational Master Plan website!http://foothill.edu/president/parc/esmp.php
3
Ed Master Plan TimelineIdentify scope of work
Secure consultants
EMP Steering Committee
Community Interviews
Online input
Campus interviews (including prep)
Town Hall (including organization)
Webinar (including prep)
Environmental scan review (Including prep)
All-day retreat (including prep)
Feedback period
Finalize institutional goals
Draft with institutional goals
Opening day
Review draft (shared governance feedback)
Editing
Submit for board approval
11/1 12/16 1/30 3/16 4/30 6/14 7/29 9/12 10/27 12/11
18
144
287
28
9
37
9
35
23
13
10
21
81
137
42
44
7
Internal Scan
4
How many students do we serve?
5
In Fall 2014
In Fall 2010
13,000
15,000
11,000
How many students do we serve?
6
In Fall 2014
In Fall 2010
13,000
15,000
11,000
Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]
How many students do we serve?
7
In Fall 2014
In Fall 2010
13,000
15,000
11,000
17,000
18,000
19,000
How many students do we serve?
8
In Fall 2014
In Fall 2010
13,000
15,000
11,000
17,000
18,000
19,000
Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]
• Declining trend in headcount and FTES • Impact of repeatability
Enrollment
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15*0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
Foothill CollegeFall Headcount Enrollment and Fiscal Year FTES
Headcount FTES
Note: 2014-15 FTES is estimated based on P1 report..
FHDA IR&P, ODA
Online Course Enrollment
10
What does the trend line suggest?Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query]
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Foothill CollegeOnline Enrollment
Fall Quarters 2010 to 2014
• Increasing trend of full-time enrollment
Enrollment
2010 2011 2012 2013 20140%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Foothill CollegeFall Enrollment by Full-Time and Part-Time Status
Full-time Part-time
FHDA IR&P, ODS
• Increasing African Americans and Latino/as• F1 headcount increase by 27% (F10 to F14)
Enrollment
African American
Asian Filipino/PI Latino/a Native American
White Other/Unk0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Foothill CollegeFall Headcount by Ethnicity
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Note: Multi-Ethnic was only reported in 2009 and 2010 and is included in Other/Unk for consistency.
CCCCO Datamart
International Students
13
China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea represent top five—795 in Fall 2014
946
1,117 1,1311,203
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall2013 Fall 2014
Foothill CollegeInternational Students with F1 Visa Status
Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Open Doors]
Are they successful?
14
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014
Foothill CollegeCourse Success by Instructional Method
Not online Online
Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query]
What’s the success gap between online and not online courses?
In Fall 2014: 9%In Fall 2010: 18%
15
Are they successful?What’s the course success gap by ethnicity?
In Fall 2014: 21%
In Fall 2010: 17%
Where is the greatest gap?
Asians and African Americans
Graduation
16
162
363
574
496535
459
579 592 602
708
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2009-10 2010-11 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
Foothill College Certificates and Degrees Awarded
Certificate Associate Degree
Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Program Review/Degrees]
• Asians earn more certificates compared to others• Whites earn more degrees compared to others
Graduation
African American
Asian/F/PI Hispanic White Native American
Other/Unkn
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
8
261
61
167
137
20
204
132
317
530
Foothill College2013-14 Certificates and Degrees by Ethnicity
Certificate Degree
CCCCO Datamart
• CSU and UC transfers suggest increasing trend, but leveling off? Comparisons to other colleges?
Transfer
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-140
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Foothill CollegeTransfers to Four-Year Institutions
UC CSU ISP/OoS
CCCCO Datamart, UCOP, CSU Analytics
• UC system– Davis, Los Angeles, San Diego
• CSU system– San Jose, San Francisco, East Bay
• In-state privates– University of San Francisco, Santa Clara University,
University of Southern California• Out-of-State
– Carnegie Mellon, New York University, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Arizona State University, Cornell University Endowed Colleges
Top Transfer Destinations
What’s your
guess?
19
CCCCO Datamart, UCOP, CSU Analytics
Let’s have a conversation!
• Seven sessions (April 13, 2015)• Train for a supportive workforce
– For high-tech industry and related businesses– Small business development
• Professional development for students– Soft Skills (key for workforce)– Internships
• Increase collaboration/partnerships• Role of lifelong education
Community Interviews
• 25 sessions and 129 participants – April 28 & 29, 2015
• One webinar– May 6, 2015
• Top themes:– College Collaboration– Student Services– Planning– Equity and Diversity
Campus Interviews
22
23
• Asking for feedback about Foothill strengths, areas for improvement, future goals– April 27, 2015 to May 8, 2015
• 124 respondents– 103 students (83%)– 1 Administrator (1%)– 9 Classified staff (7%)– 7 Full-time faculty (6%)– 4 Part-time faculty (3%)
Online Input
24
• Foothill strengths#1: Affordability (51%)#2: Teaching #3: Transfer function #4: Instructional programs #5: Commitment to students #6: Curriculum #7: Online education
Online Input
25
• Foothill areas for improvement#1: Instructional programs (29%)#2: Campus Communication #2: Career/Workforce prep/enhancement#4: Community relations/partners#5: Shared governance #6: Use of technology
Online Input
26
• Foothill initiatives and goals#1: Improve outcomes among all students (38%)#2: Improve opportunities for professional dev.#3: Improve agility to address changing
employment and economic conditions #4: Supporting instruction and services to
traditionally underserved #5: Expand outreach/recruitment including to
traditionally underserved #6: Increase sense of community involvement/engagement
Online Input
27
External Scan
28
Are our students representative?
2%
34%
25%
0%
37%
6%
34%
24%
1%
35%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
African American Asian/Filipino/PI Latino/a Native American White
Foothill CollegeSanta Clara County Adult Population and
Foothill Students by Ethnicity
2014 Santa Clara Population Foothill Fall 2014 HeadcountM
Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]CA Dept of Finance [P-3 report]
29
• Income gap (median household)– Silicon Valley: $94,534– California: $61,320
• Housing/rental prices– Median home sale price: $757,585– California median: $397,585– Average rental rate: $2,333/month
• Poverty (per federal poverty thresholds)– Silicon Valley: 11%– 10 Years ago: ~9%– About 25% of total reside in Santa Clara County
Cost of Living
Source: Joint Venture [Silicon Valley Index 2015]Silicon Valley Institute for Regional Studies [Poverty in the San Francisco Bay Area, 2015]
Median household income is based on 2013 figures.2013 Federal poverty thresholds: $11,490 for single household; $23,550 for a family of four
30
Next Steps: Identifying Goals
• The draft goals were identified as part of an all-day meeting (May 13).
• 15 proposed goals will be narrowed down to between 3 to 5.
• Open Forum: Thursday, June 4th, 11 am-noon (Toyon Room)
• Online feedback through June 12th: http://irp.fhda.edu/cgi-bin/rws5.pl?FORM=EMPinput
Proposed Goals and Feedback
32
Questions? Comments?Thanks for your time!