Foothill CollegeFoothill College

Projected Fiscal & Staffing Plan

2010-2011

Dr. Shirley TreanorVice President, Educational Resources and Instruction

District Fiscal PlanDistrict Fiscal Plan

District-wide 2010/11 budget used these broad objectives:

Bring the operating revenue & expense into balance for the 10/11 year

Preserve student access & support services as much as possible

Set aside “escrow II” & deferment 1 funds to carry positions to June 2010.

Maintain a “stability fund” to guard against last minute revenue reductions imposed by the state

Anticipate further state revenue reductions in the 11/12 fiscal year – still unknown???

Foothill’s BudgetFoothill’s Budget

85% of our budget is linked to salaries.

Due to prudent spending last year Foothill had a $4.1 mi carry over… $2 mi was undesignated.

Divisions were allowed to keep their B Budget carry over.

B-Budgets were fully restored to their pre 2009-10 allocations

Measure C funding was used for Construction, Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment, and Computers

Continue with conservative spending

Review of the District’s Review of the District’s 6/30/10 Ending Balance6/30/10 Ending Balance

The 6/30/10 ending balance was $36,807,938

Restricted:$9,890,000 District’s budgeted 5% reserves

Designated:$12,777,756 for college and Central Services carryover$ 600,333 for encumbrances carryover$ 2,156,246 for district-wide carryover (negotiated contract items, trustee election costs for 2011, Parcel Tax election costs for 2010, EIS backfill, etc.)$3,432,954 Deferment I and Escrow II

$7,950,649 Net Stability Fund

Plans for Use of Stability Fund Plans for Use of Stability Fund in 2010/11in 2010/11

In December the Board of Trustees determined that all escrow and deferment I positions remaining would be carried into the ongoing funding process.

Waiting to hear from Sacramento re: mid year cuts, etc.

District Income & Expense District Income & Expense ProjectionsProjections

Expected Income (ongoing) $181,156,493

Expenses (ongoing) $182,273,451

District Revenue less Expenses ($1,116,958)

Anticipate that we will have one time funds available in our ending balance to cover deficit.

Major Revenue AssumptionsMajor Revenue Assumptions

Zero COLA

Workload reduction sustained (3.39%) ????Growth 2.21 … would be more like restoration

Potential growth non-resident FTES ≈ $600,000

Deficit factor applied to state apportionment funds (1%)District Enrollment estimated at 36,168 FTES

Assumptions, continuedAssumptions, continued

FHDA 2010/11 Productivity & Enrollment

36,168 total FTES Projection

• FTES from regular on-campus and off-campus programs is budgeted at 35,125 FTES and productivity of 546 ... not sure we’ll make this target.

In addition, Contract Instruction programs at Foothill and Job Corps at De Anza was targeted to generate an additional 1,043 FTES … not sure we’ll make this target?

Chart on Foothill-De Anza Chart on Foothill-De Anza EnrollmentEnrollment

20000

22000

24000

26000

28000

30000

32000

34000

36000

38000

97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07Budget

Total FTES

Nonresident

Resident

Major Variables for ExpenseMajor Variables for Expense& Revenue Projections& Revenue Projections

Legislative had a problem submitting a real balanced state budget to the governor

Property tax deficit factor – still unclear.

Productivity seems to be decreasing due to both Banner & Title V requirements … as well as our targeted decreases in SE, PE and Performing Arts Alliance Program (PAA).

Growth over productivity was our goal this Winter due to low Fall and Summer enrollment numbers.

General Outlook for Fiscal Year General Outlook for Fiscal Year 2011/122011/12

2011/12 is expected to be challenging for the following reasons:

State budget is still not balanced … tuition increases? Categorical cuts remain?

Our medical benefits costs may increase and will be paid with one-time funds in 2010/11 and 2011/12

Enrollment & Productivity uncertainty

Summary on Fiscal PlanSummary on Fiscal Plan

Need to verify Banner and Title V requirements for apportionment collection.

Conservative spending.

Foothill CollegeFoothill College

Staffing Plan

2010-2011

Foothill StaffingFoothill Staffing

Current Staffing (Budgeted)Faculty (FT) 218

Faculty (PT) 241

Classified Staff (FT) 135

Classified Staff (PT) 6

Managers 25

Supervisors 6

Foothill Staffing PlanFoothill Staffing Plan

Escrow 2 and Deferment 1 positions are now in ongoing budget.

Faculty hiring prioritizationBased upon program reviews

PaRC’s recommendations

State’s guiding principle to prioritize Transfer, Basic Skills and Career Programs

Meeting needs of under-represented students

Foothill Staffing PlanFoothill Staffing Plan

Currently recruiting for 11 faculty• Counseling • ESL• Anthropology• Chemistry• Library Director• English• History*• Physics/Engineering* • Mathematics*• Child Development*• Music Technology*

Foothill Staffing PlanFoothill Staffing Plan

Need to meet FON (Full Time Faculty Obligation Number)

Last Year the District just met it’s obligation of 503

If not all positions are hired, we would fall below our new obligation of 518 … therefore, Foothill may be able to hire 4 more Faculty (start date Fall 2011)

New Faculty searches may go up to 15.